DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft EIR/EIS – November 2007 IV-73 Assumptions and Methods for Assessing Impacts Section 4.4.1 Environmental Consequences 4.4 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft EIR/EIS – November 2007 IV-73 Assumptions and Methods for Assessing Impacts Section 4.4.1 Environmental Consequences 4.4 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES Section 4.3 Environmental Setting 4.3 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Situated within the westernmost extent of the Sierra Nevada Foothills, the park’s landscape consists of two reservoirs—Folsom Lake and Lake Natoma—surrounded by rolling oak- studded foothills, upland plateaus and deep river canyons carved by the North and South forks of the American River system. The waters of Folsom Lake and Lake Natoma comprise approximately 70 percent of the total park area. Generally, the reservoirs are surrounded by a relatively narrow, and frequently steep, band of upland area. The Unit represents a significant resource within the region. As a visual and scenic resource, the Unit’s many miles of shoreline coupled with hilly topography create a wealth of viewing conditions and opportunities, including panoramic views and distinctive landscape and built features. The Unit supports nine major vegetation communities typical of the lower foothills of California’s Central Valley that provide habitat for a diverse mix of terrestrial and aquatic fauna, including several special status species. The Unit is rich in history spanning more than 4000 years and includes at least 229 archaeological sites. Refer to Chapter 2.0, Existing Conditions, of this Plan for a description of the existing project area environment, significant resource values, and the local and regional vicinity. A description of the Affected Environment is provided in the discussion of each environmental topic area. Folsom Lake State Recreation Area & Folsom Powerhouse State Historic Park IV. Environmental Analysis General Plan/Resource Management Plan Vol. 2, Draft EIR/EIS – November 2007 IV-73 Assumptions and Methods for Assessing Impacts Section 4.4.1 Environmental Consequences 4.4 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES 4.4.1 Assumptions and Methods for Assessing Impacts The purpose of the EIS/EIR is to identify impacts of the Plan that have the potential for significance and will require more detailed analysis when specific management plans and area development plans are prepared. Impact analyses and conclusions are based on interdisciplinary team knowledge of resources of the project area, reviews of existing literature, and information provided by experts in Reclamation, State Parks and other agencies. Any impacts described in this section are based on the conceptual plan of the project alternatives under consideration and the date and information used for projecting impacts per the existing conditions described in Chapter 2. Under NEPA, the significance of an impact is determined considering the context in which the impact would occur and the intensity of the action. Significance, therefore, will vary depending upon the setting of the proposed action (40 CFR 1508.27[a]). According to the CEQA Guidelines Section 15382, a significant impact on the environment refers to a “substantial, or potentially substantial adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project, including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise, and objects of historical or aesthetic significance.” Significant environmental impacts may be associated with visitor use, facility construction, or rehabilitation, or development projects, and adverse impacts can range from negative visual impacts to degradation of water quality to the disturbance or loss of cultural and natural resources. Under CEQA, an EIR is required to determine whether impacts of each alternative are significant, and if so, whether identified mitigation measures would reduce those impacts to “less than significant” levels. Therefore, “thresholds” or criteria have been developed to describe levels of impact. Thresholds are standards used to determine if an activity or project will cause or potentially cause, a substantial adverse physical change (significant impact). If the project or activity could exceed a threshold, the impact is considered to be potentially significant. In order to streamline the environmental analysis and in light of the programmatic and general nature of the General Plan/Resource Management Plan, the environmental consequences associated with implementing the project alternatives (Preferred Alternative, Alternative 3, and Alternative 4) and the No Project Alternative are summarized for each topic area using an impact matrix. The impact matrix identifies the potential effects (high, moderate, low, no impact) by alternative relative to the Parkwide Goals and Guidelines (by IV. Environmental Analysis Folsom Lake State Recreation Area & Folsom Powerhouse State Historic Park Vol. 2, Draft EIR/EIS – November 2007 General Plan/Resource Management Plan IV-74 Assumptions and Methods for Assessing Impacts Section 4.4.1 Environmental Consequences resource) and Specific Area Goals and Concepts (by management zone). These tables are intended to qualitatively describe the potential effects as a stand-alone evaluation. Additional narrative is provided only for impacts that were identified as “high” or “moderate.” Impacts that are considered “high” or “moderate” are evaluated using the CEQA Significance Criteria. The high, moderate, low, and no impact designations are further defined as follows: x High – Implementation of the project alternative is expected to result in significant, adverse impacts that could or could not be mitigated. Impacts from new or expanded facilities in previously undisturbed areas and/or sensitive areas would generally be considered high. A significant increase in development in those areas that have been previously disturbed would also be considered a high impact. x Moderate – Implementation of the project alternative could result in potential significant, adverse impacts. But these impacts can be mitigated to a level below significance. Impacts from new or expanded facilities in areas that have been previously disturbed will generally be considered moderate. x Low – Impacts from implementation of the project alternative are expected to be negligible. x No Impact – No impacts are expected as a result of project implementation. Where potentially significant impacts are noted, the EIS/EIR identifies “mitigation measures.” If appropriate mitigation can reduce the impact to below the threshold, the impact is then considered less than significant. “Mitigation” is defined as an action or actions that will: x Avoid a given impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action; x Minimize a given impact by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation; x Rectify a given impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the impacted environment; x Reduce or eliminate a given impact over time through preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action; or x Compensate for a given impact by replacing or enhancing substitute resources or environments (CEQA Guidelines Section 15370). Folsom Lake State Recreation Area & Folsom Powerhouse State Historic Park IV. Environmental Analysis General Plan/Resource Management Plan Vol. 2, Draft EIR/EIS – November 2007 IV-75 Assumptions and Methods for Assessing Impacts Section 4.4.1 Environmental Consequences As discussed above, this Plan is a first tier EIS/EIR and, as such, the description of proposed development, program impacts, and associated mitigation are general in nature. As additional management plans, area development plans, or specific projects are proposed or developed, they will be subject to further environmental review; project-specific mitigation measures will be developed and implemented at that time. IV. Environmental Analysis Folsom Lake State Recreation Area & Folsom Powerhouse State Historic Park Vol. 2, Draft EIR/EIS – November 2007 General Plan/Resource Management Plan IV-76 Environmental Effects Found Not To Be Significant Section 4.4.2 Environmental Consequences 4.4.2 Environmental Effects Found Not to be Significant As required by NEPA/CEQA, this section presents discussions related to environmental effects found not to be significant, as identified in the Initial Study prepared for the project. As these issues were found not to be significant, they are not further evaluated in this EIS/EIR but are identified and briefly discussed in this section. If the Plan is amended in the future or conditions change, these effects will have to be re-evaluated to ensure that they are still deemed not to be significant. 4.4.2.1 Agricultural Resources Implementation of the Plan would not convert farmland to nonagricultural use. The project area is not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency. Thus, the proposed Plan would not have a substantial adverse effect on agricultural resources. 4.4.2.2 Environmental Justice The objectives of Executive Order (EO) 12898, Environmental Justice include identification of disproportionately high and adverse health and environmental effects on minority populations and low-income populations that could be caused by a proposed federal action. Accompanying EO 12898 was a Presidential Transmittal Memorandum that referenced existing federal statutes and regulations, including NEPA to be used in conjunction with the EO. The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) issued Guidance Under NEPA in December 1997 (CEQ 1997). Minority populations include all persons identified by the U.S. Census of Population and Housing to be of Hispanic origin, regardless of race, and all persons not of Hispanic origin other than White. Income
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Folsom50booklet 1 5/10/2006, 10:22 AM This Booklet Was Printed in Cooperation With
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Mid-Pacific Region Folsom50Booklet 1 5/10/2006, 10:22 AM This booklet was printed in cooperation with Folsom50Booklet 2 5/10/2006, 10:22 AM U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Mid-Pacific Region Folsom50Booklet 3 5/10/2006, 10:22 AM Dedication I am pleased to offer my congratulations as Folsom Dam celebrates its 50th Anniversary. For half a century, through drought and flood, Folsom Dam has managed American River flows for the benefit of people, farms, industry, and the environment. Since its completion in 1956, it has effectively controlled flooding. Even several months before its final William E. Rinne completion, Folsom Dam prevented flood Acting Commissioner damage when a major tropical storm Bureau of Reclamation triggered rapid snowmelt. The dam impounded so much runoff that Folsom Lake filled in one week rather than the one year anticipated by engineers. It is estimated that this magnificent dam has prevented more than $5 billion in flood damage to downstream agricultural and urban areas, a testament to the foresight of the men and women who envisioned and built it. Today, Folsom Dam provides 500,000 acre-feet of water for irrigation and urban uses annually. It plays an important role in fisheries enhancement and water quality improvement in the San Francisco Bay-Delta. The dam also provides clean, renewable electricity. In 2005, it produced more than 690 million kilowatt hours. As a recreational facility, Folsom Lake is one of the most visited recreation areas operated by the California Department of Parks and Recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • 3A.12 Parks and Recreation - Land
    3A.12 PARKS AND RECREATION - LAND The two local roadway connections from the Folsom Heights property off-site into El Dorado Hills would not generate direct increases in population that could result in additional demand for parkland facilities in El Dorado County. Therefore, the “Affected Environment” does not contain a discussion of conditions in El Dorado County related to parks and recreation. 3A.12.1 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT REGIONAL ENVIRONMENT Folsom Lake Folsom Lake State Recreation Area (SRA), located approximately 5 miles north of the SPA, serves the greater Sacramento area for recreation in the form of camping, hiking, biking, boating, and other outdoor recreation activities. The lake also hosts bass fishing tournaments that frequently draw fishermen from throughout the state. California State Parks manages the Folsom Lake SRA, which includes Folsom Lake and the surrounding facilities. The lake features approximately 75 miles of shoreline and 80 miles of trails that provide opportunities for hiking, horseback riding, nature studies, camping, and picnicking. There are seven major recreation areas with facilities located around the lake. The Folsom Lake SRA, including Folsom Lake, is one of the most heavily used recreational facilities in the California State Park system, with 2 to 3 million visitor days per year. Approximately 75% of the annual visitations to the Folsom Lake SRA occur during the spring and summer, and many (85%) of the Folsom Lake SRA activities are water dependent. The Lake Natoma sub-unit of the Folsom Lake SRA is located adjacent to the City of Folsom, between Hazel Avenue and Folsom Dam, upstream from the Sacramento County-operated portion of the American River Parkway.
    [Show full text]
  • Folsom City Council Staff Re Ort
    Folsom City Council Staff Re ort MEETING DATE: 5/12/2020 AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar SUBJECT: Resolution No. I 0434- A Resolution Approving the Preliminary Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge II/Reflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs FROM: Parks and Recreation Department RECOMMENDATION I CITY COUNCIL ACTION Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No.10434- A Resolution Approving the Preliminary Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge II/Reflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No.
    [Show full text]
  • Mining's Toxic Legacy
    Mining’s Toxic Legacy An Initiative to Address Mining Toxins in the Sierra Nevada Acknowledgements _____________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The Sierra Fund would like to thank Dr. Carrie Monohan, contributing author of this report, and Kyle Leach, lead technical advisor. Thanks as well to Dr. William M. Murphy, Dr. Dave Brown, and Professor Becky Damazo, RN, of California State University, Chico for their research into the human and environmental impacts of mining toxins, and to the graduate students who assisted them: Lowren C. McAmis and Melinda Montano, Gina Grayson, James Guichard, and Yvette Irons. Thanks to Malaika Bishop and Roberto Garcia for their hard work to engage community partners in this effort, and Terry Lowe and Anna Reynolds Trabucco for their editorial expertise. For production of this report we recognize Elizabeth “Izzy” Martin of The Sierra Fund for conceiving of and coordinating the overall Initiative and writing substantial portions of the document, Kerry Morse for editing, and Emily Rivenes for design and formatting. Many others were vital to the development of the report, especially the members of our Gold Ribbon Panel and our Government Science and Policy Advisors. We also thank the Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment and The Abandoned Mine Alliance who provided funding to pay for a portion of the expenses in printing this report. Special thanks to Rebecca Solnit, whose article “Winged Mercury and
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 6-3. California's Water Infrastructure Network
    DA 17 DA 67 DA 68 DA 22 DA 29 DA 39 DA 40 DA 41 DA 46 N. FORK N. & M. TUOLOMNE YUBA RIVER FORKS CHERRY CREEK, RIVER Figure 6-3. California's Water Infrastructure ELEANOR CREEK AMERICAN M & S FORK RIVER YUBA RIVER New Bullards Hetch Hetchy Res Bar Reservoir GREENHORN O'Shaughnessy Dam Network Configuration for CALVIN (1 of 2) SR- S. FORK NBB CREEK & BEAR DA 32 SR- D17 AMERICAN RIVER HHR DA 42 DA 43 DA 44 RIVER STANISLAUS SR- LL- C27 RIVER & 45 Camp Far West Reservoir DRAFT Folsom Englebright C31 Lake DA 25 DA 27 Canyon Tunnel FEATHER Lake 7 SR- CALAVERAS New RIVER SR-EL CFW SR-8 RIVER Melones Lower Cherry Creek MERCED MOKELUMNE Reservoir SR-10 Aqueduct ACCRETION CAMP C44 RIVER FAR WEST TO DEER CREEK C28 FRENCH DRY RIVER CREEK WHEATLAND GAGE FRESNO New Hogan Lake Oroville DA 70 D67 SAN COSUMNES Lake RIVER SR- 0 SR-6 C308 SR- JOAQUIN Accretion: NHL C29 RIVER 81 CHOWCHILLA American River RIVER New Don Lake McClure Folsom to Fair D9 DRY Pardee Pedro SR- New Exchequer RIVER Oaks Reservoir 20 CREEK Reservoir Dam SR- Hensley Lake DA 14 Tulloch Reservoir SR- C33 Lake Natoma PR Hidden Dam Nimbus Dam TR Millerton Lake SR-52 Friant Dam C23 KELLY RIDGE Accretion: Eastside Eastman Lake Bypass Accretion: Accretion: Buchanan Dam C24 Yuba Urban DA 59 Camanche Melones to D16 Upper Merced D64 SR- C37 Reservoir C40 2 SR-18 Goodwin River 53 D62 SR- La Grange Dam 2 CR Goodwin Reservoir D66 Folsom South Canal Mokelumne River Aqueduct Accretion: 2 D64 depletion: Upper C17 D65 Losses D85 C39 Goodwin to 3 Merced River 3 3a D63 DEPLETION mouth C31 2 C25 C31 D37
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B ~ HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN and DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES~
    Appendix B ~ HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES~ Appendix B Visual Resources B.01 VISUAL RESOURCES B.01.01 Regional he Folsom Historic District is located in the central-western portion of the City of Folsom, at T the western edge of the Sierra Nevada foothills. The surrounding region to the east includes primarily grassy rolling hills dotted with oak trees. Elevations increase to 500 ft. above mean sea level (msl) within 10 miles of the Historic District. To the west is the mostly urbanized Sacramento metropolitan area, with elevations near 100 ft. msl. Northeast of the Historic District, Folsom Dam and Folsom Lake are prominent visual features. The lake and surrounding shoreline are part of the Folsom Lake State Recreation Area (FLSRA), which offers opportunities to view the lake and the dam. Folsom Prison, including a broad buffer area of open grassland~ and the FolsomEity'Park lie between the Historic District and Folsom Lake. Southeast of the Historic District is a residential and modern commercial zone, while the area directly south includes land scheduled for development which in 1995 was vegetated by grassland, oak woodland, and a narrow riparian strip along Willow Creek. The west and north boundaries of the Historic District are formed by the Lake Natoma section of the American River. The American River, Lake Natoma, and Folsom Lake contribute significantly to the overall visual character of the Folsom area. Much of this lake/river complex is surrounded by the open space of the FLSRA with a fairly intact greenbelt of lush riparian vegetation and unique bedrock outcroppings that lend, a distinct natural quality to the urban landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Folsom City Council Staff Ort
    Folsom City Council Staff ort MEETING DATE: slrv202l AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10625 - A Resolution Approving the Preliminary Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble fudge, Cobble Hills Ridge IllReflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs F'ROM: Parks and Recreation Department RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 10625 - A Resolution Approving the Preliminary Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 202I-2022 American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge IllReflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the River Report
    Lower American River State of the River Report Water Forum 660 J Street, Suite 260 Sacramento, CA 95814 1 April 2005 Lower American River The Water Forum is a diverse group of business and agricultural leaders, citizens groups, environmentalists, water managers, and local governments in the Sacramento Region that have joined to fulfill two co-equal objectives: • Provide a reliable and safe water supply for the region’s economic health and planned development to the year 2030; and • Preserve the fishery, wildlife, recreational, and aesthetic values of the lower American River. In 2000, Water Forum members approved a comprehensive Water Forum Agreement, consisting of integrated actions necessary to provide a regional solution to potential water shortages, environmental degradation, groundwater contamination, threats to groundwater reliability, and limits to economic prosperity. The Water Forum Agreement allows the region to meet its needs in a balanced way through implementation of seven elements. The seven elements of the Water Forum Agreement are: 1) increased surface water diversions, 2) actions to meet customers’ needs while reducing diversion impacts in drier years, 3) an improved pattern of fishery flow releases from Folsom Reservoir, 4) lower American River Habitat Management Element, 5) water conservation, 6) groundwater management, and 7) the Water Forum Successor Effort (WFSE). The WFSE was created to implement the seven elements of the Water Forum Agreement over the next 30 years. Additional information can be found on the Water Forum’s web site at: www.waterforum.org. Water Forum 660 J Street, Suite 260 Sacramento, CA 95814 April 2005 2 Lower American River State of the River Report 3 Letter to Readers Dear Reader, This is the first lower American River State of the River Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C ~HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN and DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES~
    Appendix C ~HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES~ Appendix C Environmental Resources he Folsom Historic District encompasses both developed lands and open space areas. These T existing undeveloped areas support most of the important natural environmental resources in the project area. The open space is concentrated primarily along the south bank of Lake Natoma within the Lake Natoma Unit of the Folsom Lake State Recreation Area (FLSRA). Within the Historic District boundaries, the FLSRA consists of federally owned land and state-owned lands that contain dredge tailings. These lands are managed by the California Department of Parks and Recreation. The City's intent is to continue its policy of cooperation with the California Department of Parks and Recreation. This cooperation may include joint development of trails, parking, and other facilities consistent with the missions of both agencies as well as communication and problem-solving on topics of mutual concern. Most of the central portion of the Historic District is developed urban land, but small areas support small amounts of the same communities· found on the state-managed lands. The City values the trees and other landscaping installed im the .developed, area for their contribution to the natural · environment as well as to the attractiveness and comfort of the District. The following sections discuss environmental resources that occur throughout the Historic. District. C.O 1 GEOLOGY he City of Folsom is located offthe·east·margin,of the··SacramentoValley-at the·base of.the T central Sierra Nevada foothills. Within the Historic District, elevations vary from approximately 130 ft. above mean sea level (msl) to 320 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FOLSOM POWERHOUSE NO. 1 1895 National Historic Mechanical
    THE FOLSOM POWERHOUSE NO. 1 1895 National Historic Mechanical Engineering Landmark The American Society of Mechanical Engineers September 12, 1976 FACTUAL DATA ON AMERICAN RIVER DIVISION The American River Division, a part of the Central Valley Project, provides water for irrigation, municipal and industrial use, hydroelectric power, recreation, and flood control through a system of dams, canals, and powerplants. The Division includes Folsom and Sly Park Units, both in operation, and Auburn-Folsom South Unit in construction stage. FOLSOM UNIT consists of Folsom Dam, Lake, AUBURN-FOLSOM SOUTH UNIT, authorized in and Powerplant, Nimbus Dam, Lake Natoma, and 1986, will provide agricultural and municipal and Nimbus Powerplant on the American River. The industrial water supplies for Placer, El Dorado, Folsom Unit was added to the Central Valley Project Sacramento, and San Joaquin Counties, together with by Congressional authorization in 1949. hydroelectric power, flood control, fish protection, and new recreational facilities. Principal features of the Unit will be Auburn Dam, Powerplant and Reservoir, FOLSOM DAM AND FOLSOM LAKE. Folsom Dam, the Folsom South Canal, and Sugar Pine and County below a drainage area of 1,875 square miles, was Line Dams and Reservoirs. constructed by the Corps of Engineers and upon completion was transferred to the Bureau of AUBURN DAM presently under construction will Reclamation for coordinated operation as an integral be a 700-foot-high, concrete thin arch structure, with part of the Central Valley Project. The dam has a a crest length of 4,000 feet. The dam will create the concrete main river section with a height of 340 feet 2.4 million acre-foot Auburn Reservoir.
    [Show full text]
  • U N S U U S E U R a C S
    (Live Oak Blvd) Incline Village- Colusa Ran StHwy 99 Washoe S Crystal Bay ( Tahoe R t H Lake i Kings v w Vista e y r Beach 8 StH R w 9 y d 2 Lake Wildwood 0 Grass Valley ) WASHOE Colusa S t H LYON w Dayton y S 20 0 7 tR te y 2 0 Dollar w S to tH ac en S r a m Point StRte 174 R ( C ive r Penn Valley olfax Marlette 0 Hwy) 2 Lake y w YUBA 108th Congress of the United States tH S NEVADA Tierra Marys- Williams Sutter Buena Yuba ville StHwy 20 Rollins Reservoir CARSON CITY City Beale Sunnyside- Carson Col AFB Alta Tahoe City Sierra Sugar Pine Reservoir Carson City S t Hwy Linda Stewart Com 9 4 French Meadows 4 y Stewart Com 5 South Reservoir w H Yuba City Beale t Lake Indian StHwy 99 Olivehurst S AFB Colfax Tahoe Hills Hell Hole Reservoir COLUSA Stewart Com Johnson S t Hwy 6 Lane 5 5 Lake of Camp Far the Pines Arbuckle West Reservoir S t H Wheatland w y 395 70 Foresthill SUTTER Zephyr Cove- S t Round Hill Village H Meadow w Stateline Loon y S Vista 8 tH Lake 9 w y 6 Minden 5 ( S t DOUGLAS R Kingsbury d DISTRICT 65 Gardnerville ) 2 South Lake Tahoe StHwy 45 PLACER North Auburn Georgetown Feather River Stumpy S Dresslerville Col (L t wy 193 Meadows Lake Fallen a H H 80 tH u w St wy S etown r y 1 rg R d ) Leaf Lake e 9 l 9 o A 3 e Gardnerville 9 e G l ( v l e i ) USAF Global v Auburn Ranchos e Communication s Receiver o Byp Union Valley h R StHwy 113 g Reservoir u o l S o t K n Lincoln ni e ght s L m Mud Lake an a Lower Roseville 50 din r g c Echo Lake R a id Byp StHw S y 4 ge Blvd) Centro (El 70 StHwy 9 Ice House C Co ut Loomis ( loma Rd) Reservoir
    [Show full text]
  • Folsom Lake State Recreation Area 7755 Folsom-Auburn Road Folsom, CA 95630 (916) 988-0205
    Our Mission The mission of California State Parks is to provide for the health, inspiration and Folsom Lake education of the people of California by helping olsom Lake’s to preserve the state’s extraordinary biological F State Recreation Area diversity, protecting its most valued natural and cultural resources, and creating opportunities miles of shoreline and for high-quality outdoor recreation. waterside trails attract millions of boaters, equestrians, cyclists, California State Parks supports equal access. and hikers each year. Prior to arrival, visitors with disabilities who need assistance should contact the park at (916) 988-0205. If you need this publication in an alternate format, contact [email protected]. CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 For information call: (800) 777-0369 (916) 653-6995, outside the U.S. 711, TTY relay service www.parks.ca.gov Folsom Lake State Recreation Area 7755 Folsom-Auburn Road Folsom, CA 95630 (916) 988-0205 © 2008 California State Parks (Rev. 2016) F olsom Lake State willow, redbud, tule, milkweed, sedge grass, Recreation Area offers and native grapevines. PLANTS AND WILDLIFE scenic panoramas After the 1848 gold discovery, most of Blue oaks, interior live of open grasslands, the Nisenan lands were given away as oaks, foothill pines, and rolling hills, the Sierra Spanish land grants. The native people annual grasses dot the Nevada, Sacramento were overwhelmed by the loss of their food open woodlands. In the Valley, and the Bay sources and by diseases like smallpox. The spring, blooming wildflowers Area’s Mount Diablo. Nisenan people were nearly decimated, include Indian paintbrush, Folsom Lake State but today their descendants live in nearby Scenic views larkspur, lupine, brodiaea, fiddleneck, Recreation Area communities or on reservations.
    [Show full text]