Natural Resource Condition Assessment: Cape Lookout National Seashore

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Natural Resource Condition Assessment: Cape Lookout National Seashore National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Natural Resource Condition Assessment Cape Lookout National Seashore Natural Resource Report NPS/SECN/NRR—2017/1434 ON THE COVER Foal season begins at Cape Lookout. National Park Service photo. Natural Resource Condition Assessment Cape Lookout National Seashore Natural Resource Report NPS/SECN/NRR—2017/1434 JoAnn M. Burkholder, Elle H. Allen, Carol A. Kinder, and Stacie Flood North Carolina State University Center for Applied Aquatic Ecology 620 Hutton Street, Suite 104 Raleigh, N.C. 27606 May 2017 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado i The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review, which was provided by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data. The level and extent of peer review was based on the importance of report content or its potentially controversial or precedent- setting nature. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This report is available in digital format from the Southeast Coast Network website, the Natural Resource Condition Assessment website, and the Natural Resource Publications Management website. To receive this report in a format that is optimized to be accessible using screen readers for the visually or cognitively impaired, please email [email protected]. Please cite this publication as: Burkholder, J. M., E. H. Allen, C. A. Kinder, and S. Flood. 2017. Natural resource condition assessment: Cape Lookout National Seashore. Natural Resource Report NPS/SECN/NRR— 2017/1434. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS 623/138142, May 2017 ii Contents Page Figures.................................................................................................................................................. vii Tables ..................................................................................................................................................xiii Appendices ........................................................................................................................................xxiii Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... xxv Overall Report Card of Natural Resource Conditions in Cape Lookout National Seashore as of 2014 .......................................................................................................................................... xxix Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................. xxxi Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................xxxiii 1. NRCA Background Information ........................................................................................................ 1 2. Introduction and Resource Setting ..................................................................................................... 5 2.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 5 2.1.1. Park History, Enabling Legislation, and Examples of Other Legislation and Actions Affecting CALO Natural Resources ............................................................................ 8 2.1.2. Geographic Setting ........................................................................................................ 13 2.1.3. Visitation and Demographics ........................................................................................ 14 2.2. Natural Resources .................................................................................................................. 15 2.2.1. Land Use in the Watershed of the Albemarle-Pamlico Estuarine Complex ................. 15 2.2.2. Natural Resource Descriptions ...................................................................................... 18 2.3. Resource Stewardship ......................................................................................................... 194 2.3.1. Management Directives and Planning Guidance......................................................... 194 2.3.2. Synopsis of Stressors to Cape Lookout Natural Resources ......................................... 202 3. Study Scoping and Design ............................................................................................................. 207 3.1. Preliminary Scoping ............................................................................................................ 207 3.2. Study Design ....................................................................................................................... 210 3.2.1. Data Sources ................................................................................................................ 210 4. Indicators to Assess Natural Resource Conditions ........................................................................ 213 4.1. Adjacent Human Population and Visitors to the Seashore .................................................. 213 4.1.1. Human Population in the Area .................................................................................... 213 4.1.2. Visitation ..................................................................................................................... 217 iii Contents (continued) Page 4.2. Land Use/Land Cover—Shackleford Banks ....................................................................... 220 4.3. Air Quality ........................................................................................................................... 222 4.4. Soundscape .......................................................................................................................... 226 4.5. Lightscape............................................................................................................................ 228 4.6. Geology ............................................................................................................................... 230 4.7. Surface Water ...................................................................................................................... 234 4.7.1. Surface Water Quality ................................................................................................. 234 4.7.2. Surficial Sediment Quality .......................................................................................... 236 4.7.3. Fish Tissue Quality ...................................................................................................... 241 4.8. Groundwater ........................................................................................................................ 243 4.8.1. Groundwater Supply .................................................................................................... 243 4.8.2. Groundwater Quality ................................................................................................... 245 4.9. Biological Resources ........................................................................................................... 247 4.9.1. Vascular Plant Communities ....................................................................................... 247 4.9.2. Estuarine Benthic Macroinvertebrates ........................................................................ 249 4.9.3. Fish .............................................................................................................................. 251 4.9.4. Herpetofauna ............................................................................................................... 252 4.9.5. Birds ............................................................................................................................ 255 4.9.6. Mammals ..................................................................................................................... 259 4.9.7. Species of Special Concern
Recommended publications
  • Foundation Document Overview, Cape Lookout National Seashore
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Overview Cape Lookout National Seashore North Carolina Contact Information For more information about the Cape Lookout National Seashore Foundation Document, contact: Park Headquarters at [email protected] or www.nps.gov/calo or write to: Superintendent, Cape Lookout National Seashore, 131 Charles St., Harkers Island, NC 28531 Purpose Significance Significance statements express why Cape Lookout National Seashore resources and values are important enough to merit national park unit designation. Statements of significance describe why an area is important within a global, national, regional, and systemwide context. These statements are linked THE PURPOSE OF CAPE to the purpose of the park unit, and are supported by data, LOOKOUT NATIONAL research, and consensus. Significance statements describe SEASHORE is to preserve the the distinctive nature of the park and inform management outstanding natural, cultural, and decisions, focusing efforts on preserving and protecting the most important resources and values of the park unit. recreational resources and values • Cape Lookout National Seashore, 56 miles of barrier islands of a dynamic, intact, natural off the North Carolina coast, is an outstanding example barrier island system, where of a dynamic, intact, natural barrier island system, where ecological processes dominate. ecological processes dominate. • Cape Lookout National Seashore is one of the few remaining locations on the Atlantic coast where visitors can experience and recreate in a primarily undeveloped, remote barrier island environment, which can be reached only by boat. • Cape Lookout National Seashore preserves a diversity of coastal habitats, which support aquatic and terrestrial plant and animal life, including several protected species, such as piping plovers, American oystercatchers, sea turtles, black skimmers, terns, and seabeach amaranth.
    [Show full text]
  • HORSES, KENTUCKY DERBY (1875-2019) Kentucky Derby
    HORSES, KENTUCKY DERBY (1875-2019) Kentucky Derby Winners, Alphabetically (1875-2019) HORSE YEAR HORSE YEAR Affirmed 1978 Kauai King 1966 Agile 1905 Kingman 1891 Alan-a-Dale 1902 Lawrin 1938 Always Dreaming 2017 Leonatus 1883 Alysheba 1987 Lieut. Gibson 1900 American Pharoah 2015 Lil E. Tee 1992 Animal Kingdom 2011 Lookout 1893 Apollo (g) 1882 Lord Murphy 1879 Aristides 1875 Lucky Debonair 1965 Assault 1946 Macbeth II (g) 1888 Azra 1892 Majestic Prince 1969 Baden-Baden 1877 Manuel 1899 Barbaro 2006 Meridian 1911 Behave Yourself 1921 Middleground 1950 Ben Ali 1886 Mine That Bird 2009 Ben Brush 1896 Monarchos 2001 Big Brown 2008 Montrose 1887 Black Gold 1924 Morvich 1922 Bold Forbes 1976 Needles 1956 Bold Venture 1936 Northern Dancer-CAN 1964 Brokers Tip 1933 Nyquist 2016 Bubbling Over 1926 Old Rosebud (g) 1914 Buchanan 1884 Omaha 1935 Burgoo King 1932 Omar Khayyam-GB 1917 California Chrome 2014 Orb 2013 Cannonade 1974 Paul Jones (g) 1920 Canonero II 1971 Pensive 1944 Carry Back 1961 Pink Star 1907 Cavalcade 1934 Plaudit 1898 Chant 1894 Pleasant Colony 1981 Charismatic 1999 Ponder 1949 Chateaugay 1963 Proud Clarion 1967 Citation 1948 Real Quiet 1998 Clyde Van Dusen (g) 1929 Regret (f) 1915 Count Fleet 1943 Reigh Count 1928 Count Turf 1951 Riley 1890 Country House 2019 Riva Ridge 1972 Dark Star 1953 Sea Hero 1993 Day Star 1878 Seattle Slew 1977 Decidedly 1962 Secretariat 1973 Determine 1954 Shut Out 1942 Donau 1910 Silver Charm 1997 Donerail 1913 Sir Barton 1919 Dust Commander 1970 Sir Huon 1906 Elwood 1904 Smarty Jones 2004 Exterminator
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (2012)
    FGDC-STD-018-2012 Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard Marine and Coastal Spatial Data Subcommittee Federal Geographic Data Committee June, 2012 Federal Geographic Data Committee FGDC-STD-018-2012 Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard, June 2012 ______________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS PAGE 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Need ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Scope ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Application ............................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Relationship to Previous FGDC Standards .............................................................. 4 1.6 Development Procedures ......................................................................................... 5 1.7 Guiding Principles ................................................................................................... 7 1.7.1 Build a Scientifically Sound Ecological Classification .................................... 7 1.7.2 Meet the Needs of a Wide Range of Users ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT of ENVIRONMENT and NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Water Quality Environmental Sciences Section
    NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Water Quality Environmental Sciences Section April 2005 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables...........................................................................................................................................3 List of Figures..........................................................................................................................................3 OVERVIEW.............................................................................................................................................4 WHITE OAK RIVER SUBBASIN 01........................................................................................................8 Description .................................................................................................................................8 Overview of Water Quality .........................................................................................................9 Benthos Assessment .................................................................................................................9 WHITE OAK RIVER SUBBASIN 02......................................................................................................11 Description ...............................................................................................................................11 Overview of Water Quality .......................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • No One Knows for Sure When the First Europeans Looked Upon Carteret's Barrier Islands
    Graves and Shackleford No one knows for sure when the first Europeans looked upon Carteret’s barrier islands. However, an Italian explorer named Giovanni da Verrazzano left what most consider to be the first written description of Core Banks. Sailing northeast from Cape Fear his party of explorers reached the area of Carteret County in 1524. He tried to send a party ashore but the wave action along the beach made this impossible. However, a single sailor did reach the shore where he was greeted by natives who carried him a distance from the surf. The frightened man is reported to have screamed in dismay at this turn of events. He became even more upset when he saw them prepare a large fire. But as soon as he recovered his strength these natives let him return to Verrazzano’s ships. Over the years, from Verrazzano’s report until English settlement in the late 1600s, the Indians reported that there were several shipwrecks along the coast and that some Europeans (probably Spanish) did make it to safety where they lived with the Indians. In 1713 an estimated seven thousand acres, all of Core and Shackleford Banks, was given by the English to a man named John Porter. He held the land only a few years and in 1723 sold it to Enoch Ward and John Shackleford. Known as the Sea Banks, this narrow piece of land stretching from Beaufort Inlet northeastward to Ocracoke Inlet was divided between Shackleford and Ward. Ward got the area north of Cape Lookout, known today as Core Banks while Shackleford gave his name to the area southwest of Lookout to Beaufort Inlet, Shackleford Banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Classification and Nomenclature by Norbert Leist and Andrea Jonitz Prof
    ISTA Purity Seminar 15. June 2009 Zürich TlTools for seed identifi cati on species classification and nomenclature by Norbert Leist and Andrea Jonitz Prof. Dr. Norbert Leist Dr. Andrea Jonitz Brahmsstr.25 LTZ Augustenberg 76669 Bad Schönborn Neßlerstr.23 Germany 76227 Karlsruhe [email protected] Germany [email protected] Aquilegia vulgaris, Variation Variation • Variation is everywhere in biological systems. Natural variation at the population level is usualy not continuous, but occurs in discrete units or taxa. Easily the most important taxonomic level is the species because it is often the smallest clearly recognizable and discrete set of populations. • Understanding how species form and how to recognize them have been major challenges to systematists. The variation in one population becomes interrupted, the way to a split into two species strong hairy nearly glabrous Variation on species • Sources of variation: MttiMutation Recombination Independent assortment of the chromosomes Random genetic drift Selection Conservation of species characteristics avoiding gene flow Isolating barriers: temporal (seasonal, diurnal) habitat (wet, dry; calceous, silicious) floral (structural, behavioral eg. adaptations for pollinators) reproductive mode (self fertilisation, agamospery) incompatibility (pollen, seeds) hybrid inviability hybrid floral isolation hybrid sterility hybrid break down Iris germanica Iris sibirica Isolation by habitat Definition of „species“ is not easy A species is the smallest aggregation of populations
    [Show full text]
  • An Historical Overviw of the Beaufort Inlet Cape Lookout Area of North
    by June 21, 1982 You can stand on Cape Point at Hatteras on a stormy day and watch two oceans come together in an awesome display of savage fury; for there at the Point the northbound Gulf Stream and the cold currents coming down from the Arctic run head- on into each other, tossing their spumy spray a hundred feet or better into the air and dropping sand and shells and sea life at the point of impact. Thus is formed the dreaded Diamond Shoals, its fang-like shifting sand bars pushing seaward to snare the unwary mariner. Seafaring men call it the Graveyard of the Atlantic. Actually, the Graveyard extends along the whole of the North Carolina coast, northward past Chicamacomico, Bodie Island, and Nags Head to Currituck Beach, and southward in gently curving arcs to the points of Cape Lookout and Cape Fear. The bareribbed skeletons of countless ships are buried there; some covered only by water, with a lone spar or funnel or rusting winch showing above the surface; others burrowed deep in the sands, their final resting place known only to the men who went down with them. From the days of the earliest New World explorations, mariners have known the Graveyard of the Atlantic, have held it in understandable awe, yet have persisted in risking their vessels and their lives in its treacherous waters. Actually, they had no choice in the matter, for a combination of currents, winds, geography, and economics have conspired to force many of them to sail along the North Carolina coast if they wanted to sail at all!¹ Thus begins David Stick’s Graveyard of the Atlantic (1952), a thoroughly researched, comprehensive, and finely-crafted history of shipwrecks along the entire coast of North Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Document Cape Lookout National Seashore North Carolina October 2012 Foundation Document
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Cape Lookout National Seashore North Carolina October 2012 Foundation Document To Nags Head OCRACOKE Natural areas within Water depths 12 Cape Lookout NS Ocracoke D Lighthouse N y Maritime forest 0-6 feet Ranger station Drinking water r A r L e S (0-2 meters) I F r Picnic area Parking e Cape Hatteras Beach and More than 6 feet g Permit required n (more than 2meters) e National grassland s Picnic shelter Showers s HYDE COUNTY a Seashore P Marshland CARTERET COUNTY E Restrooms Sanitary disposal station Beacon I K O C A North Rock R Tidal flat Toll ferry Lodging Gas station C Shell Castle O Life-Saving Service Station (Historic) PORTSMOUTH VILLAGE (Historic) Casey Ocracoke Open seasonally Island Inlet Babb-Dixon Cemetery There are no roads within Some land within the park National Ocean Survey Methodist Church the national seashore; a remains private property; charts are indispensable Community Cemetery 4-wheel-drive vehicle is please respect the owner's for safe navigation in Schoolhouse highly recommended for rights. these waters. driving on the beach. Sheep Island Tidal flats may flood quickly at high tide— depending upon winds North 0 5 Kilometers and seasons. ) y r y r r e 0 5 Miles F r e e PORTSMOUTH FLATS F t a t e S l c a i n i h l e o r V a C h t r o N ( PAMLICO SOUND PAMLICO COUNTY Mullet Shoal CARTERET COUNTY Pilontary Islands Wainwright I Shell Island Harbor Island Chain Shot Island Cricket Hog Island Island Cedar Island y r Point of Grass a d C n eda
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions in Cape Lookout National Seashore North Carolina
    Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions in Cape Lookout National Seashore North Carolina Michael A. Mallin Virginia L. Johnson Matthew R. McIver Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2004/322 United States Department of the Interior • National Park Service The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the national park system. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 ii Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions in Cape Lookout National Seashore, North Carolina Michael A. Mallin, Virginia L. Johnson, Matthew R. McIver Center for Marine Science University of North Carolina at Wilmington Wilmington, N.C. 28403 http://www.uncw.edu/cmsr/aquaticecology/laboratory This work was accomplished under Task Order J2380 03 0238 of Cooperative Agreement H5000 02 0433 of the South Florida / Caribbean Cooperative Ecosystems Study Support Unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Permitting Activity 01/01/2020 Thru 8/2/2020 Date of Report: 08/03/2020 L-BUILD ONLY - Grouped by Type Then Subtype Page 1 of 228
    Permitting Activity 01/01/2020 Thru 8/2/2020 Date of Report: 08/03/2020 L-BUILD ONLY - Grouped by Type then Subtype Page 1 of 228 Issued App. Permit Sq- Total Fees Date Status Number Sub Type Type Valuation Feet Contractor Owner Address Total Fees Due Commercial Permits: Addition Permits: LB2000140 Addition Commercial $30,000.00 518 L&L CONSTRUCTION SERVICESBANNERMAN LLC CROSSINGS II6668 LLC Thomasville Rd $287.46 $0.00 3/12/20 Issued LB2000383 Addition Commercial $95,000.00 2800 COMMERCIAL REPAIR & RENOVATIONSWESTON TRAWICK INC. INC 5392 Tower Rd $1,954.57 $0.00 5/7/20 Issued LB2000386 Addition Commercial $17,000.00 748 ADVANCED AWNING & DESIGN,JNC REALTY LLC ENTERPRISES6800 INC Thomasville Rd, Ste 106 $412.88 $0.00 4/20/20 Issued Addition Totals: 3 $142,000.00 $2,654.91 $0.00 Alteration Permits: LB1801185 Alteration Commercial $12,000.00 BETACOM INCORPORATEDTALL TIMBERS RESEARCH, 4000INC County Rd 12 $224.17 $0.00 2/10/20 Issued LB1802065 Alteration Commercial $40,000.00 4021 HILL DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT,NGUYEN LOAN LLC T 4979 Blountstown Hwy $3,917.67 $0.00 3/11/20 Issued LB1900627 Alteration Commercial $75,000.00 THE DEEB COMPANIES CAMELLIA OAKS LLC 4330 Terebinth Trl $2,377.76 $0.00 5/5/20 Certificate of Occupancy LB1901330 Alteration Commercial $250,000.00 SOUTHEAST INDUSTRIAL RENTALCOLE CS AND TALLAHASSEE CLEANING FL INC 4067LLC Lagniappe Way $3,090.38 $0.00 2/3/20 Issued LB1901550 Alteration Commercial $200,000.00 WSD ENGINEERING GLOBAL SIGNAL ACQUISITIONS2008 IV Mckee LLC Rd $2,548.65 $0.00 6/9/20 Issued LB1901889 Alteration Commercial $56,050.00 1120 TAYLOR CONSTRUCTION &3219 RENOVATION TALLAHASSEE LLC 3219 N Monroe St $1,981.57 $0.00 2/17/20 Issued LB1902034 Alteration Commercial $20,632.00 2008 CHAPMAN CANOPY INCORPORATEDRIVERS RD EXPRESS #15 LLC6330 Crawfordville Rd $1,827.13 $0.00 2/5/20 Issued LB1902154 Alteration Commercial $20,000.00 SAC WIRELESS LLC CROWN CASTLE USA 1478 Capital Cir NW $568.64 $0.00 2/26/20 Issued LB1902168 Alteration Commercial $400,000.00 OLIVER SPERRY RENOVATIONLEON AND COUNTY CONSTRUCTION,1583 INC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Saratoga Special Friday, September 2, 2016 Here&There
    Year 16 • No. 31 Friday, September 2, 2016 T he aratoga Saratoga’s Daily Newspaper on Thoroughbred Racing since 2001 Roller Girl Coasted cruises home in P.G. Johnson Tod Marks Tod MADE YOU LOOK WINS WITH ANTICIPATION • WHO MADE YOUR PICNIC TABLE? • ENTRIES & RESULTS 2 THE SARATOGA SPECIAL FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 2016 here&there... at Saratoga BY THE NUMBERS 6: Training runs on the 5-mile trail at the Saratoga Spa State Park for The Special’s Joe Clancy and Tom Law in August in preparation for Saturday’s Run for the Horses 5K. Depending on how you look at it, they’re probably over the top, they might bounce or they could need a race. And rabbits won’t help them. Lots: Of slots available in Saturday’s Run for the Horses 5K at Saratoga Spa State Park. Check out at www.trfinc.org/event/5k for more information. 19: Cases of empty Corona bottles stacked outside a dorm room Wednes- day morning. 2:30: Time writer Dave Grening’s alarm clock went off Wednesday morning so he could get to Saratoga from home and still see morning training. LICENSE PLATES OF THE DAY SHAVINGS: New York. EASYGOER: New York. NAMES OF THE DAY Bermuda Triangle, 10th race. The 3-year-old gelding is by Stormy Atlantic. Crackerjack Jones, ninth race. Chester and Mary Broman’s 6-year-old, who runs in the Evan Shipman Stakes, is by Smarty Jones out of Confidently. Two Pump, eighth race. The 5-year-old mare is by Second In Command out Connie Bush of Lite My Pumpkin.
    [Show full text]
  • Address Index Book 2020-2021
    MODESTO AREA SCHOOLS K-12 ADDRESS INDEX BOOK JULY 1, 2020 – JUNE 30, 2021 Published by: Modesto City Schools Duane Wolterstorff, Senior Director Business Services Cyndi Campbell, Planning Analyst Business Services – Planning 209-492-1685 EVERY STUDENT MATTERS, EVERY MOMENT COUNTS 1ST ST 700 899 Franklin Mark Twain Modesto 1ST (Empire) ST 4700 5299 Empire Glick Johansen 2ND ST 600 999 Franklin Mark Twain Modesto 2nd (Empire) ST 4800 4844 Empire Glick Johansen 3RD ST 600 1099 Franklin Mark Twain Modesto 3RD (Empire) ST 1000 5099 Empire Glick Johansen 3RD (Empire) ST 4700 4999 Empire Glick Johansen 4TH ST 400 1199 Franklin Mark Twain Modesto 5TH ST 400 1199 Franklin Mark Twain Modesto 6TH ST 100 1299 Franklin Mark Twain Modesto N 7TH ST 100 1399 Franklin Mark Twain Modesto S 7TH ST 400 1498 Even Tuolumne Hanshaw Johansen S 7TH ST 401 1499 Odd Shackelford Hanshaw Downey 8TH ST 600 1699 Franklin Mark Twain Modesto 9TH ST 100 898 Even Wilson La Loma Johansen 9TH ST 101 1699 Odd Franklin Mark Twain Modesto 9TH ST 900 1698 Enslen Roosevelt Davis N 9TH ST 100 298 Even Enslen Roosevelt Davis N 9TH ST 101 1239 Odd Martone Roosevelt Davis N 9TH ST 300 598 Even Enslen Roosevelt Davis Page 1 of 236 N 9TH ST 600 1598 Even Garrison Roosevelt Davis N 9TH ST 1241 1599 Odd Hart-Ransom Hart-Ransom Modesto S 9TH ST 400 1499 Tuolumne Hanshaw Johansen Page 2 of 236 1 10TH ST 100 899 Wilson La Loma Johansen 10TH ST 900 1599 Enslen Roosevelt Davis 11TH ST 100 899 Wilson La Loma Johansen 11TH ST 900 1499 Enslen Roosevelt Davis 12TH ST 100 899 Wilson La Loma Johansen
    [Show full text]