World Political Science Review 2014; 10(2): 385–423 Marc Bühlmann*, Adrian Vatter, Oliver Dlabac and Hans-Peter Schaub Liberal and Radical Democracies: The Swiss Cantons Compared Abstract: This article examines the widespread hypothesis that German-speak- ing Swiss cantons exhibit radical-democratic characteristics, while the Latin cantons possess stronger liberal-representative democratic profiles. Empirical and multi-dimensional measuring of the quality of democracy in the cantons shows that this hypothesis does not do the complexity of cantonal democracy justice. Today’s position of the cantons along the axes of liberal and radical democracy is best explained with reference to the strong liberal and democratic constitutional movements within the cantons during the middle of the 19th century. Keywords: measuring the quality of democracy; liberal democracy; radical democracy; Switzerland; path dependence (Erblast hypothesis). DOI 10.1515/wpsr-2014-0017 1 Introduction A key concern of empirical research on democracy is to assess and compare different types of political regimes. Measuring democracy plays a prominent role. Its origins lie in the works of Lipset (1959) and Dahl (1956) and have been continued and developed in numerous other studies (for a summary see: Lauth 2004; Pickel and Pickel 2006). The existing empirical works distinguish them- selves noticeably in that they focus almost exclusively on the national level while the subnational level is practically ignored. This gap in the research *Corresponding author: Marc Bühlmann, Institute of Political Science, University of Bern, Switzerland, e-mail:
[email protected] Adrian Vatter and Hans-Peter Schaub: Institute of Political Science, University of Bern, Switzerland Oliver Dlabac: Department of Political Science, University of Zurich, Switzerland 386 Marc Bühlmann et al.