Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan

Background: A directive from the Department for Transport requires that each local authority produces a Local Cycling & Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP) aimed at improving the Active Travel modes of cycling and walking for journeys to work, schools, shops, healthcare facilities and public transport hubs such as train stations.

Projects in the plan can then be considered for central government funding; however, just because a project is in the plan it doesn’t guarantee that it will funded; but if isn't in, it definitely won’t happen!

CCC members have been advising the experienced consultants who drafted the Plan over the last six months on the specific needs of the residents of .

For a copy of the CWaC report see Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan summary document (PDF, 19MB)

The CWaC plan splits the Borough into five separate areas, i.e.Chester City, and Neston, & , and and a matrix at the and of the report categorises each separate plan as either Short Medium or long term deliverability.

Plans for Chester

The four projects in Chester include mixed infrastructure including two way light segregated cycle track, traffic calming, public realm improvements and inner ring road walking improvements. Route Timeframe for delivery C1 City Centre - North East Medium = up to 5 yrs; C2 City Centre - South West Medium = up to 5 yrs; C3 Handbridge and Curzon Park Short = up to 3 yrs C4 Lache and Chester Business Park Short = up to 3 yrs

The LCWIP identifies the following improvements to cycle routes in Chester:

 A new link between the Millennium Cycleway and Chester Railway Station.  Improvements along A56 Road corridor.  Improved links between Railway station, city centre and wider city cycle network.  Improved links between Lache, Westminster Park and Chester Business Park and new housing development on road.  General improvements to lighting, signing and safety for wider cycle network.  Longer term options for improvements on Grosvenor Bridge.

Chester Cycling Campaign – discussion document related to the CWaC LCWIP consultation Jan 2020 Page 1

Chester Cycling Campaign – discussion document related to the CWaC LCWIP consultation Jan 2020 Page 2

Greenway Access and Hoole Road

At the desire line prioritisation stage, Hoole Road Corridor emerged as the top priority for Chester, however, it was confirmed that a multi modal corridor study is soon to be progressed by CW&C. In light of this, the prioritised desire line for Chester was to/from Chester Station and the City Centre and onwards broadly southwest to Chester Business Park.

The inclusion of a new link from the Greenway at the back of West St would provide residents in , Newton, Kingsway and a direct link to the station, this new link could emerge onto Hoole Way via a new access close to the bridge or via the Ermine Road Junction. The preferred connection should be explored as part of carrying forward LCWIP schemes to detailed design development where factors such as land availability/ownership will be considered.

The Hoole Road Study will need to consider a range of options to improve active travel at the existing railway bridge pinch point for example a new bridge.

Investigation will also be required as part of further LCWIP design work and the Hoole Road corridor study into the Hoole Road/Ermine Road junction for prioritisation of movement for Non-Motorised Users (NMU).

From Hoole Way the LCWIP recommendations include the implementation of a ramp to as opposed to steps to access Chester Station.

Chester Station and City Road

The route to Chester Station from Westminster Road and Charterhall Drive is recommended to be formalised and promoted. The LCWIP recommendations also support cycle priority change to the traffic lights on Westminster Road/Station Approach railway bridge.

The route to and from Chester Station platform cycle parking via Queens Road, the Station Long Term Car Park and via the Carriage Shed from One City Place is supported as a proposal to be explored further as part of the LCWIP.

From Chester Station access to the city centre is via City Road with dedicated cycle lanes recommended. The LCWIP proposals include a recommendation for a new ramp access down to the canal side and on to Russell St. The alternative route from Chester Station via quiet roads, i.e. via St and Egerton St is also included in the LCWIP recommendations.

Whilst this route is less direct than City Road, it provides level access to the canal currently, uses home zone streets, and also provides links to Chester Bus Station.

The LCWIP proposals continue Canal Side and along Russell Street, crossing onto Dee Lane to The Groves and over the Old Dee Bridge.

Chester Cycling Campaign – discussion document related to the CWaC LCWIP consultation Jan 2020 Page 3

It is recommended that the LCWIP route continues on Castle Drive to Grosvenor Road. It is understood that Dee Lane is not completely flat, however this is not seen as a significant barrier to NMU’s. The Grosvenor Bridge crossing as discussed below provides an alternative route.

River Crossing

It is acknowledged that there is an existing railway crossing providing connectivity over the River Dee to the racecourse, however, this is not step free, and therefore is not currently in line with the objectives and aspirations of the CW&C’s LCWIP.

It is recommended that as a longer-term solution further engineering design work including a review of previous assessments of this is undertaken to understand the viability of making this bridge step-free and fully accessible to desirable widths for all users.

Grosvenor Bridge is the most direct route along this corridor and, whilst width is constrained, in the short and medium-term the LCWIP recommends walking and cycling improvements on this route.

It is recommended that this section should be explored as being a 20mph zone to make the route more user-friendly/safer for Non-Motorised Users. It is recommended that the pavement could be upgraded and designed to at least minimum if not desirable footway widths of 2.5m. An advisory cycle lane could be indicated on the carriageway alongside additional signage. A parallel cycle and walking crossing providing clear priority for these users is recommended across the A483 Grosvenor Road to facilitate movement onto Nuns Road or Castle Drive.

In the long term, pending further traffic modelling as and when alternative longer- term measures are in place to enhance traffic capacity on the wider network, there is an option to explore priority to NMU’s.

Options include changing the carriageway surfacing over the bridge to different textured and coloured material, to enable cycle traffic and motor traffic to share the carriageway more comfortably. The vehicular central road markings could also be removed. In addition, long term, the LCWIP supports the full assignment of Grosvenor Bridge to NMU’s, based on the delivery of an outer ring road or other major scheme proposals which would remove this route being a strategic route for motorised vehicles.

The LCWIP recommends that the policy of Queens Park Bridge being pedestrian only is reviewed to consider cyclist use, as this inexpensive change would deliver an NMU crossing of the River Dee.

Handbridge, Lache, Wrexham Road and Chester Business Park

The LCWIP recommendations extend via Handbridge and along Overleigh Road to up to High St. The proposals follow Old Wrexham Road joining Chester Cycling Campaign – discussion document related to the CWaC LCWIP consultation Jan 2020 Page 4

Wrexham Road into Chester Business Park. The LCWIP recommendations link Lache Lane from Wrexham Road and join Hough Green.

The route from Handbridge across Edgar’s Field, past Nowhere House and up past the Cemetery is recommended to have improvements including lighting. Wrexham Road is proposed to have segregated cycle ways providing better access to Kings School and ultimately the Business Park.

NMU priority traffic light controlled crossings at the Business Park roundabout and future residential development are recommended.

The LCWIP notes the commitment as part of the Wrexham Road residential development to deliver a continuous 3m wide footway/cycleway along Wrexham Road within the development frontage, replacing the existing footway and formalising provision for the Chester Purple Cycle Route, to be delivered as part of Section 278 agreements for highway works.

In addition, there will be provision of new signalised pedestrian/ cycle crossing facilities at the Heronsway North and Kings School junctions, to be delivered as part of Section 278 agreements for highway works. There will also be signing and lining improvements for existing Purple and Gold Cycle Routes, to be delivered as part of Section 278 agreements for highway works.

It is recommended that further work should consider and explore the upgrade of Dukes Drive as a traffic free route. The LCWIP recommendations from Hough Green to Saltney include an on-road segregated cycle lane with a parallel cycle and walking crossing across A483 to avoid the Overleigh Roundabout.

The LCWIP acknowledges that improvements in the Lache area are not currently fixed to one route, instead proposals are for a 20mph zone with traffic calming. In addition, a route with NMU improvements would provide a direct route connecting Lache Lane with Wrexham Road and access to the forthcoming housing development. This would lead directly to the Business Park and also give good access to the upgraded Wrexham Road cycleway.

Chester cycling proposals are illustrated in Figure 2-1 above.

The CWaC link to the plan is : http://inside.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/get_involved/consultations/local_cycling _and_walking_infrastructure_plan_consultation

Chester Cycling Campaign – discussion document related to the CWaC LCWIP consultation Jan 2020 Page 5

The Consultation:

The public consultation is your chance to voice your opinion on the plan prior to its finalisation and adoption in Spring 2020.

It is particularly important that pupils attending high schools and primary schools (and their parents), say what they think about the proposals if they would like to see safer car free travel options to their schools.

Now to the Questionnaire......

The link to the survey is https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/LCWIPConsultation

The questions relevant to residents who live in the Chester area are: No’s. 1, 2, 7, 8, 14, 15, 17, 18 & 19-27.

Please take time to let the Council know your views on the current proposals and be as specific as possible, especially if you wish to describe a location which you think is unsafe.

We have provided examples of the type of comment which Chester Cycle Campaign will be making in its response and we appreciate that you may or may not agree with them.

Q. 2 To what extent do you agree or disagree with these priority improvements?

This is an example of a comment that CCC may make.

“Yes – partly agree. We agree that each of these improvements need to be made.

However as CWAC has declared a Climate Emergency the timescale of up to 5 years to complete them is far too long.”

Are there any additional priorities or improvements that you feel should be included for Chester? If so, please tell us in the box below.

This is an example of a comment that CCC may make.

“Yes.

A high quality shared use link between , Huntington and new housing at Camp should also be developed across the river Dee to connect both with the Chester Business Park and also to Handbridge (Catholic High School, FE college, University buildings ) and onward into the City Centre.

Chester Cycling Campaign – discussion document related to the CWaC LCWIP consultation Jan 2020 Page 6

This would provide a safe, attractive and direct route from these areas and help relieve motor traffic pressure into the Business Park from the A55 from residents on the East side of Chester.”

Q. 7. Thinking about all the key priorities for cycling routes across the borough etc…

This is an example of a comment that CCC might suggest...

“We strongly support any improvements that can be implemented in Chester that facilitate safer river crossings for cyclists, especially by those who are less confident road users. This especially applies to Grosvenor Bridge. This would be achieved by a re-allocation existing highway space to non motorised users combined with a radical strategic plan as to how the direction of traffic flow for key entrance/exit routes or motor vehicles to the city can be redefined ”

Walking proposals for Chester

The LCWIP identifies the following improvements to key walking routes in Chester:

 New shared use link between the Millennium Cycleway and the railway station.  Improved crossing points on the inner ring-road including Fountains Roundabout, City Bars and Hoole Road Roundabout.  Extending the core pedestrian area and public realm improvements within the City Centre.  Improving pedestrian safety by widening pavements.  Longer term opportunities to improve routes over the River Dee.

Q.8 To what extent do you agree or disagree with these priority improvements for Chester ?

This is an example of a comment that CCC may make.

“We would support a new link from the Millennium Cycleway to the railway station as part of the objective of improving the quality of the route across Hoole Bridge for both pedestrians and cyclists.”

General views on walking route improvements

Q.14. Thinking about all the key priorities for walking routes across the borough etc….

This is an example of a comment that CCC may make.

“Better signage for walkers would encourage more foot journeys for visitors (or perhaps students or newer residents of the city) to negotiate the City more effectively. This often would be applicable to cyclists.” Chester Cycling Campaign – discussion document related to the CWaC LCWIP consultation Jan 2020 Page 7

Q. 17. Listed below are measures the Council could put in place to encourage…..

This is an example of a comment that CCC may make.

 Improved road safety and traffic calming

 More areas covered by 20 mph zones

 Other “More infrastructure should be designed by those who regularly use a bicycle for transport rather than vehicle users who do not cycle and have little awareness of the road environment for non motorised users. There are too many examples in the past of infrastructure implementations that have demonstrated lack of insight as to how they will be used by cycles”

Q. 18. Do you have any further comments you would like to make about………

This is an example of a comment that CCC may make.

“Publish information to every household showing how much Active Travel helps reduce pollution, the use of fossil fuel as well as improving health & wellbeing and referencing networks/routes that could be used or are due for improvement.”

Q. 19-27. These are questions about either you or the group (if any) you represent.

What we would like you to do

Please complete the online survey focussing on the questions relevant to Chester, as the more we can demonstrate that the local community is behind this plan the better chance we will have of attracting funding in the future. https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/LCWIPConsultation

If there are any comments you would wish us to take on board then please email the CCC t [email protected]

Chester Cycling Campaign – discussion document related to the CWaC LCWIP consultation Jan 2020 Page 8