Stationary Direct Methanol Fuel Cells Using Pure Methanol
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Stationary Direct Methanol Fuel Cells Using Pure Methanol PI and presenter: Xianglin Li / University of Kansas Co-PI: Gang Wu/ University at Buffalo Co-PI: Jun Li / Kansas State University Co-PI: Shawn Litster / Carnegie Mellon University Date: April 29, 2019 2019 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Review Project ID # FC317 This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information Overview Timeline Barriers Addressed • Project Start Date: 10/01/2018 • High platinum group metals • BP1: 10/1/2018 - 12/31/2019 (PGM) catalyst loading • BP2: 1/1/2020 - 12/31/2020 • Catalyst poisoning by methanol • BP3: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2021 • High fuel crossover • Effective Project Start Date: 01/03/2019 • Project End Date: 12/31/2021 Partners Budget PI : Xianglin Li • Total Project Budget: $ 1,249,449 University of Kansas (KU) • Recipient Share: $ 250,050 • Federal Share: $ 999,399 Co-PI: Gang Wu • Planned funding for University at Buffalo (UB) Budget Period 1: $ 469,489 Co-PI: Jun Li • Total DOE Funds Spent*: $ 13,283.93 Kansas State University (KSU) * As of 3/1/2019 Co-PI: Shawn Litster Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) 2 Relevance/Impact • Objectives: The goal of this collaborative research is to develop stationary direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) using pure methanol as the fuel. • Three critical challenges from material to system levels: (1) Reduce noble catalyst loading and cost; (2) Enhance cathode tolerance of methanol poisoning; (3) Decrease methanol crossover. • End of the Project Goal: The MEA and prototype delivered at the end of the project (50 cm2 MEA) will produce peak power density of ≥ 300 mW/cm2 with total loading of ≤ 3 mgPGM/cm2. • 1st BP target (10/1/2018 - 12/31/2019): The fuel cell prototype to be delivered at the first year (25 cm2 MEA) will meet the milestone of ≥ 250 mW/cm2 with 4 mgPGM/cm2. 3 Approach This research integrates complementary institutional expertise on • Platinum group metals free (PGM-free) cathode catalyst (UB); • Supported anode catalysts (KSU); • Electrode fabrication, characterization, and optimization (CMU); • Multi-phase mass transfer (KU): to (1) Reduce noble catalyst loading and cost; (2) Enhance cathode tolerance of methanol poisoning; (3) Decrease methanol crossover. The technical progress made by the H2 fuel cell R&D greatly benefit this project: • The fabrication of advanced catalyst support materials; • The design and development of PGM-free catalysts; • The capability of electrode characterization and fabrication; • The understanding of liquid-vapor mass transfer in porous electrodes. 4 Approach The planned milestones and Go/No-Go decisions for FY19 (the quarters areMilestone counted Description starting from Jan 01, 2019)Status Develop a testing platform to control fuel cell temperature, fuel and 100% cathode flow rates, and relative humidity (KU). Develop a system to sputter completion PtRu onto VACNFs and evaluate catalytic activities using RDE (KSU). Q1 Develop a system to synthesize PGM-free cathode catalysts and evaluate catalytic activities using RDE (UB). Set up the sample preparation system, MicroCT facility, and data processing platform. (CMU) The fuel cell with commercial MEAs achieves about 125 mW/cm2 peak 50% power density with >3.0 M methanol solution (KU). Reconstruct nano-CT completion Q2 images of commercial electrodes (CMU). Establish correlation of RDE activity of pre-screened catalysts and MEA performance for DMFC (UB). Synthesize catalyst with E1/2>0.80 V using dilute methanol solution (UB). 20% Synthesize PtRu catalyst on VACNFs and evaluate its anodic MOR catalytic completion activity in dilute methanol solution (KSU). Incorporate customized anode Q3 and cathode catalysts into electrodes and generate nano-CT images of electrodes (CMU). The fuel cell with customized MEAs achieves a peak power of 175 mW/cm2 with >3.0 M methanol solutions (KU&CMU). Go/No-GO Single cells with customized MEAs achieve a peak power of ≥ 10% Q4 2 2 250 mW/cm with ≤4 mgPGM/cm using >3.0 M methanol solution. completion 5 This project was not reviewed last year Accomplishments and Progress – Anode Catalyst Support 50 nm NH3, o C2H2 600-800 C Carbon Nanofibers 20 nm DC-biased Plasma Enhanced Depending upon growth conditions, CVD (PECVD) cone angles can vary between 5-30o. & Bare AvCarbEP40T PECVD Growth of Vertically PECVD Growth of VACNT (0.2 mm thick, 13 wt%PTFE) Aligned Carbon Nanofiber on AvCarbAvCarb P50 (VACNT) on AvCarbEP40T after 30 min. after 30 min. Initial VACNF growth was successful on several carbon cloth/paper with and without PTFE treatment. 6 This project was not reviewed last year Accomplishments and Progress – Cathode Catalysts Fe-based PGM-free ORR catalysts Fe-based PGM-free ORR catalysts show excellent methanol tolerance. 7 This project was not reviewed last year Accomplishments and Progress – Cathode Catalysts Surfactants N N N N N N Pyrolysis N N N N N N N N HO N N Co-based PGM-free ORR catalysts High-performance PGM-free and Fe-free catalysts show enhanced performance and stability Mn-based PGM-free ORR catalysts 8 This project was not reviewed last year Accomplishments and Progress – Electrode Characterization Xradia UltraXRM-L200 nano-CT Schematic representation of nano-CT •Two levels of resolution- (a) 50 nm resolution (16 nm pixels) for a 16 µm field of view & (b) 150 nm resolution (65 nm pixels) for a 65 µm field of view; •Conventional absorption contrast imaging mode at 8 keV to generate the contrast by the X-ray absorptivity of the sample (a function the local atomic number and density) •Zernike phase contrast mode to enhance imaging of low-contrast, soft materials (e.g., carbon and organic materials) with low Z. The research team has a unique Nano-CT to measure the detailed pore-scale structures of fuel cell electrodes. 9 This project was not reviewed last year Accomplishments and Progress – Electrode Characterization • Prior development of PGM-free cathodes Nano-CT: 3D Mapping of Cs+ stained Ionomer with Fe-MOF PGM-free catalyst in Poor CMU’s FC171 project infiltration • Optimized particle size and ionomer and thick films with integration for repeatable, high air 40 nm performance • Applying CMU’s PGM-free cathode design 10 μm principles to DMFC cathode requirements 40 nm, I/C 1 60 nm, I/C 0.6 1 100 nm Air Cathode catalyst 0.8 Performance 400 nm 0.6 0.4 MEA 1 free Voltage (V) - MEA 2 0.2 MEA 3 20 µm HFR 100 nm, I/C 0.6 600 nm, I/C 0.6 0 Highly uniform Thicker Nafion 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 distributions for >80 nm films with 600 nm o 80 C, Air/H2, 1.5 atm, 100% RH Current Density (A/cm2) Primary particle size and ionomer loading should consider trade-offs between activity, conductivity, and mass transport. 10 This project was not reviewed last year Accomplishments and Progress – Fuel and Water Management 2 2 Methanol Channel 5 cm commercial MEAs, Methanol Channel 5 cm commercial MEAs, Fuel Management 80oC 80oC MEA MEA no fuel management layer AN: Fuel Management Layer no water management layer Air Channel no water management layer Air Channel 0.7 120 0.7 100 1M 90 0.6 ) 2M 0.6 ) 100 2 3M 80 2 0.5 0.5 80 70 0.4 0.4 60 60 50 0.3 0.3 Voltag (V) (V) Voltag 40 Voltag (V) (V) Voltag 40 0.2 0.2 30 0.25M Powr density (mW/cm 20 Powr density (mW/cm 0.1 0.5M 20 0.1 10 1M 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 100 200 300 400 0 100 200 300 400 Current Density (mA/cm2) Current Density (mA/cm2) Commercial electrodes 1/C ml/min MeOH, 0.2 l/min Air 1 ml/min MeOH, 0.2 l/min Air AN: micro porous layer on Carbon Cloth The fuel management is critical for the high-performance operation of fuel cells with concentrated methanol solutions 11 This project was not reviewed last year Accomplishments and Progress – Fuel and Water Management Computational domains Methanol concentration O concentration of the fuel cell model 2 The fuel cell models can help understand the liquid- vapor two-phase flow within the MEA. 12 Collaboration and Coordination Sub: Jun Li Anode catalyst on Kansas State University vertically aligned carbon Anode Catalyst nanofibers with ultralow PGM loading. Sub: Gang Wu Cathode catalyst: highly methanol-tolerant and University at Buffalo low-cost PGM-free catalysts. Cathode PGM-free Catalyst CL/MPL Sub: Shawn Litster Electrode fabrication, Carnegie Mellon University characterization and Electrode characterization optimization using high- resolution X-ray CT imaging and simulation. w Prime: Xianglin Li System integration and Methanol Channel H2O, A prototype development. Fuel Management Layer ↑RA University of Kansas ṁH2O Fuel and water ↑ the water back flow! ↓RMem management to H2O H2O ṁH2O Water Barrier Layer enable DMFCs using ↑R Air Channel C pure methanol. wH2O, C 13 Remaining Challenges and Barriers Challenge: • Performance of customized non-PGM catalysts and anode catalyst supports. • Production scale-up of customized catalysts and catalyst supports for 25 cm2 and 50 cm2 MEAs; • Fuel management of fuel cells running with highly concentrated methanol solutions or pure methanol. • Development of accelerated stress test (AST) procedures for DMFC. Planned Resolution: • Select, design and synthesize catalysts and catalyst support materials based on successful progress made by hydrogen fuel cells research. • Explore different methods for catalyst deposition: sputtering, microwave- assisted synthesis, atomic layer deposition, etc. • Understand pore-scale liquid-vapor two-phase transfer assisted by advanced imaging technologies (micro- and nano-CT) and model simulations. • Develop DMFC’s AST by modifying established AST protocols for hydrogen fuel