DOCSLIB.ORG

Pacific Ocean Bering Sea Arctic Ocean 4 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pacific Ocean Bering Sea Arctic Ocean 4 3 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 03Ð4188 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES Magnitude and frequency of peak streamflowsÑPLATE 1 Curran, J.H., and others, 2003, Estimating the magnitude and frequency of peak streamflows for ungaged sites on streams in Alaska and conterminous basins in Canada Arctic B a r ro w 15 798 700 Ocean 15304700 0 40 80 120 160 MILES 15056210 Beaufort Sea 15056200 15304650 15056560 15056100 Skagway 0 40 80 120 160 200 KILOMETERS Klukwan 15041000 Haines 15896000 15896700 15048000 L 15049900 15041100 y n 15918200 n Cana 15052000 15999900 15052800 15041200 15057500 15054500 RUSSIA l 15039900 15044000 15052500 15040000 7 15053800 15036000 15054000 15034000 15910200 15109000 Juneau 15910000 15050000 15038000 15031000 15908000 Icy Str 15101490 River ait Stephen 15906000 Hoonah 15101500 Colville Elfin Cove 15024640 15108250 s P 15108000 assa 15904900 Pelican Tenakee A Springs ound 15106940 g R S e 1C5ha1th0am6960 15102000 C 15388948 15388944 oss 15107000 2 15024690 T Cr I C 15747000 15106980 15388950 15106920 S Angoon t r 15028300 15388960 ait 15024695 C B r o o k s R a n g e 15026000 I Sound 15087585 R C 15564868 1 L 15564872 River 15024800 15024700 15100000 k Kake E 15564875 c 15087545 15015590 15389000 eri 15087570 15024750 15564877 d Kupreanof Petersburg 15087690 15098000 re 15389500 Sitka F 15087250 15008000 Canada 15088000 Wrangell 15744500 15744000 15564879 Alaska Hyder 15743850 15087590 cupine 15022000 15564885 or 15564884 P 15010000 15564887 15094000 Point Baker Port Protection 15080000 15086900 15078000 15076000 15453481 Yukon 15093400 15086600 CoffmaCnla Cove 15070000 rence Str River Port Alexander 15081490 15074000 Edna Bay 15068000 Thorne Bay 15012000 15453610 15453500 15081497 a 15067900 15442500 15081500 it 15060000 15564900 Christian 15085800 15072000 Sound 15081580 15059500 15011500 15457800 15438500 Kasaan 15439800 Klawock Ketchikan 15637000 15457700 Hollis Saxman 15712000 15468000 15519000 15520000 15085700 Craig 15085600 15085100 15668100 15519200 15635000 15541650 15530000 15356000 5 15058000 15668200 Metlakatla 15541600 15081890 Bering Sea 15535000 Hydaburg 15633000 oyukuk 15541800 15490000 15367500 15624998 15625000 K 15514000 15493000 15365000 15621000 15619000 Fairbanks 15511000 15344000 15355000 15305700 15083500 15564600 15493500 15305412 Nome 15585000 15485500 15348000 15305695 15484000 15305590 15564800 River 15305698 EXPLANATION 15305582 15515500 15480000 ance 15514500 15476400 Glacier ice 15565200 15305950 15476300 Dixon Entr 15518250 T 15478000 15305620 15518200 anana 15305920 Norton 15305650 15518350 15518080 15476000 15305670 15518000 15478500 15476200 15305900 15305420 15478499 15471500 15305450 15476050 15471000 Sound e 15516200 River 15305390 Palmer 15516050 15515800 15478093 15476049 15470000 15305406 15284000 6 15516000 15305400 Wasilla g 15478040 15305360 15478050 15469900 Yukon 15294350 15291200 15473950 Big Lake 15478010 n 15515900 15305300 15281000 15198500 15473600 on 15291000 15291100 e r 15305350 Knik 15280000 15303660 a v 15470300 15277410 River i 15199000 uk R 15470330 River 15305260 Eklutna 15303600 15200280 Y 15303700 R 15292392 Knik Arm 15277200 15292000 15291500 15200270 15470340 15305540 15277100 15292400 r 15200000 15305100 15201000 15276000 e 15292700 15201900 4 p 15294025 15282400 15565447 p Anchorage 15274300 15292800 15202000 15305500 River a 15293700 15201100 o 15274000 15273900 15293000 15206000 15305000 C 15208100 15305050 15294100 15294005 15304950 15305250 15304000 15208200 Liard k 15294300 15290000 15208000 15120000 15281500 Susitna 15294450 15294010 15211700 Tyonek 15283500 15282000 15305030 15290200 15285000 15211900 Whitehorse Tu 15272530 s 15209000 15120500 15305150 rn again Arm 15212000 15304520 15212500 15209100 15304855 15272550 Hope River a 15304850 15305200 15227500 15213400 15304750 15271900 15267900 Anchorage 15212800 15271000 okwim l 15120720 Whittier 15304800 Kusk 15294500 15304600 Inlet 15272280 15236200 15219000 15120600 15270400 15304293 15304298 15219100 15269500 A 15216000 15195000 15304200 Nikiski 15251800 15024400 Salamatof 15129500 15024300 15266500 Moose Pass enai 15237400 15258000 15254000 Kenai 15024500 15246000 K 2 Cooper Landing 15024200 15248000 15250000 Soldotna 15266300 15024600 15260000 15302000 15300000 Peninsula 15244000 15237360 Cook Kasilof Kenai 15243950 15300200 Juneau 15024670 15242000 4 15303000 Tu 15238000 15302500 stumena PLak eninsula Gulf of Alaska 15024684 15303011 Clam Gulch 15300500 Seward 15303010 British e 15303150 15302900 1 15238600 15241600 15297900 Ninilchik Columbia 15240500 e EXPLANATION Nikolaevsk 15239050 15240000 Anchor Point g 15296000 1 Streamflow analysis region boundary 15239900 15239500 15239000 15297475 and region number Kachemak Gulf of n 15297200 15239800 Homer a 15295600 15565447 Alaska Streamflow-gaging station and number, R peak flow analysis Coast 15238820 3 EXPLANATION Mountains Seldovia Glacier ice Nanwalek Port Graham 3 Road Bristol Bay Portlock 0 10 20 30 40 MILES 0 10 20 30 40 50 KILOMETERS n Hecate Str t i a e u A l 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 MILES ait Pacific Ocean 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 KILOMETERS MAP SHOWING STREAMFLOW ANALYSIS REGIONS AND LOCATIONS OF STREAMFLOW-GAGING AND PARTIAL-RECORD STATIONS FOR WHICH PEAK-STREAMFLOW STATISTICS WERE COMPUTED, ALASKA AND CONTERMINOUS BASINS IN CANADA By Janet H. Curran, David F. Meyer, and Gary D. Tasker 2003.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Recent Declines in Warming and Vegetation Greening Trends Over Pan-Arctic Tundra
    Remote Sens. 2013, 5, 4229-4254; doi:10.3390/rs5094229 OPEN ACCESS Remote Sensing ISSN 2072-4292 www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing Article Recent Declines in Warming and Vegetation Greening Trends over Pan-Arctic Tundra Uma S. Bhatt 1,*, Donald A. Walker 2, Martha K. Raynolds 2, Peter A. Bieniek 1,3, Howard E. Epstein 4, Josefino C. Comiso 5, Jorge E. Pinzon 6, Compton J. Tucker 6 and Igor V. Polyakov 3 1 Geophysical Institute, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, College of Natural Science and Mathematics, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 903 Koyukuk Dr., Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Institute of Arctic Biology, Department of Biology and Wildlife, College of Natural Science and Mathematics, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, P.O. Box 757000, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA; E-Mails: [email protected] (D.A.W.); [email protected] (M.K.R.) 3 International Arctic Research Center, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, College of Natural Science and Mathematics, 930 Koyukuk Dr., Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, 291 McCormick Rd., Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 5 Cryospheric Sciences Branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 614.1, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 6 Biospheric Science Branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 614.1, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA; E-Mails: [email protected] (J.E.P.); [email protected] (C.J.T.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-907-474-2662; Fax: +1-907-474-2473.
    [Show full text]
  • Flow of Pacific Water in the Western Chukchi
    Deep-Sea Research I 105 (2015) 53–73 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Deep-Sea Research I journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/dsri Flow of pacific water in the western Chukchi Sea: Results from the 2009 RUSALCA expedition Maria N. Pisareva a,n, Robert S. Pickart b, M.A. Spall b, C. Nobre b, D.J. Torres b, G.W.K. Moore c, Terry E. Whitledge d a P.P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, 36, Nakhimovski Prospect, Moscow 117997, Russia b Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA c Department of Physics, University of Toronto, 60 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A7, Canada d University of Alaska Fairbanks, 505 South Chandalar Drive, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA article info abstract Article history: The distribution of water masses and their circulation on the western Chukchi Sea shelf are investigated Received 10 March 2015 using shipboard data from the 2009 Russian-American Long Term Census of the Arctic (RUSALCA) pro- Received in revised form gram. Eleven hydrographic/velocity transects were occupied during September of that year, including a 25 August 2015 number of sections in the vicinity of Wrangel Island and Herald canyon, an area with historically few Accepted 25 August 2015 measurements. We focus on four water masses: Alaskan coastal water (ACW), summer Bering Sea water Available online 31 August 2015 (BSW), Siberian coastal water (SCW), and remnant Pacific winter water (RWW). In some respects the Keywords: spatial distributions of these water masses were similar to the patterns found in the historical World Arctic Ocean Ocean Database, but there were significant differences.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Northern Bering-Chukchi Sea
    12/18:&LME&FACTSHEET&SERIES& NORTHERN BERING- CHUKCHI SEA LME tic LMEs Arc NORTHERN'BERING+CHUKCHI'SEA'LME'MAP 18 of Map Russia Bering Strait Alaska Russia LME Canada Iceland Central Arctic Ocean 12 "1 ARCTIC LMEs Large&! Marine& Ecosystems& (LMEs)& are& defined& as& regions& of& work&of&the&ArcMc&Council&in&developing&and&promoMng&the& ocean& space& of& 200,000& km²& or& greater,& that& encompass& Ecosystem& ApproacH& to& management& of& the& ArcMc& marine& coastal& areas& from& river& basins& and& estuaries& to& the& outer& environment.& margins& of& a& conMnental& sHelf& or& the& seaward& extent& of& a& predominant&coastal&current.&LMEs&are&defined&by&ecological& Joint'EA'Expert'group' criteria,&including&bathymetry,&HydrograpHy,&producMvity,&and& PAME& establisHed& an& Ecosystem& ApproacH& to& Management& tropically& linked& populaMons.& PAME& developed& a& map& expert& group& in& 2011& with& the& parMcipaMon& of& other& ArcMc& delineaMng&17&ArcMc&Large&Marine&Ecosystems&(ArcMc&LME's)& Council&working&groups&(AMAP,&CAFF&and&SDWG).&THis&joint& in&the&marine&waters&of&the&ArcMc&and&adjacent&seas&in&2006.& Ecosystem&ApproacH&Expert&Group&(EAYEG)&Has&developed&a& In&a&consultaMve&process&including&agencies&of&ArcMc&Council& framework& for& EA& implementaMon& wHere& the& first& step& is& member&states&and&other&ArcMc&Council&working&groups,&the& idenMficaMon& of& the& ecosystem& to& be& managed.& IdenMfying& ArcMc& LME& map& was& revised& in& 2012&to&include&18&ArcMc& the&ArcMc&LMEs&represents&this&first&step. LMEs.& THis& is& the& current&
    [Show full text]
  • Origin of Marginal Basins of the NW Pacific and Their Plate Tectonic
    Earth-Science Reviews 130 (2014) 154–196 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth-Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Origin of marginal basins of the NW Pacificandtheirplate tectonic reconstructions Junyuan Xu a,⁎, Zvi Ben-Avraham b,TomKeltyc, Ho-Shing Yu d a Department of Petroleum Geology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China. b Department of Geophysics and Planetary Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv 69978, Israel c Department of Geological Sciences, California State University, Long Beach, CA 90840, USA d Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan article info abstract Article history: Geometry of basins can indicate their tectonic origin whether they are small or large. The basins of Bohai Gulf, Received 4 March 2013 South China Sea, East China Sea, Japan Sea, Andaman Sea, Okhotsk Sea and Bering Sea have typical geometry Accepted 3 October 2013 of dextral pull-apart. The Java, Makassar, Celebes and Sulu Seas basins together with grabens in Borneo also com- Available online 16 October 2013 prise a local dextral, transform-margin type basin system similar to the central and southern parts of the Shanxi Basin in geometry. The overall configuration of the Philippine Sea resembles a typical sinistral transpressional Keywords: “pop-up” structure. These marginal basins except the Philippine Sea basin generally have similar (or compatible) Marginal basins of the NW Pacific Dextral pull-apart rift history in the Cenozoic, but there do be some differences in the rifting history between major basins or their Sinistral transpressional pop-up sub-basins due to local differences in tectonic settings. Rifting kinematics of each of these marginal basins can be Uplift of Tibetan Plateau explained by dextral pull-apart or transtension.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Report Card 2018 Effects of Persistent Arctic Warming Continue to Mount
    Arctic Report Card 2018 Effects of persistent Arctic warming continue to mount 2018 Headlines 2018 Headlines Video Executive Summary Effects of persistent Arctic warming continue Contacts to mount Vital Signs Surface Air Temperature Continued warming of the Arctic atmosphere Terrestrial Snow Cover and ocean are driving broad change in the Greenland Ice Sheet environmental system in predicted and, also, Sea Ice unexpected ways. New emerging threats Sea Surface Temperature are taking form and highlighting the level of Arctic Ocean Primary uncertainty in the breadth of environmental Productivity change that is to come. Tundra Greenness Other Indicators River Discharge Highlights Lake Ice • Surface air temperatures in the Arctic continued to warm at twice the rate relative to the rest of the globe. Arc- Migratory Tundra Caribou tic air temperatures for the past five years (2014-18) have exceeded all previous records since 1900. and Wild Reindeer • In the terrestrial system, atmospheric warming continued to drive broad, long-term trends in declining Frostbites terrestrial snow cover, melting of theGreenland Ice Sheet and lake ice, increasing summertime Arcticriver discharge, and the expansion and greening of Arctic tundravegetation . Clarity and Clouds • Despite increase of vegetation available for grazing, herd populations of caribou and wild reindeer across the Harmful Algal Blooms in the Arctic tundra have declined by nearly 50% over the last two decades. Arctic • In 2018 Arcticsea ice remained younger, thinner, and covered less area than in the past. The 12 lowest extents in Microplastics in the Marine the satellite record have occurred in the last 12 years. Realms of the Arctic • Pan-Arctic observations suggest a long-term decline in coastal landfast sea ice since measurements began in the Landfast Sea Ice in a 1970s, affecting this important platform for hunting, traveling, and coastal protection for local communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Saving the World's Natural Wonders from Climate Change
    Saving the world's natural wonders from climate change HOW WWF FIELD WORK DEFENDS NATURE AND PEOPLE FROM CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS WWF Briefing Paper EMBARGOED FOR THURSDAY 5 April 2007, 11.30 CET IPCC Working Group 2 is finalising its report showing how climate change is and will be affecting the different regions of the planet. WWF, with its conservation programmes in over 90 countries, is witnessing some of these impacts already. In the following document, we provide short overviews on ten of the places where we work and what we are doing there to build defenses against the effects of climate change. The regions presented are: ►Great Barrier Reef and other coral reefs around the world ►A desert drying out – Chihuahua (Mexico and USA) ►Turtles in the Caribbean ►The oldest Climate Witness Alive: Valdivian temperate rainforests (Chile) ►Tigers and People in the Indian Sunderbans ►China: Upper Yangtze ►The Amazon ►The fate of the wild salmon - Bering Sea and Pacific North- East/Alsaka, USA ►Melting Glaciers in the Himalayas ►East African Coastal Forests ►East Africa Marine SPOKESPEOPLE: Dr Lara Hansen, Chief Scientist, WWF’s Global Climate Change Programme Hans Verolme, Director, WWF Climate Change Programme MEDIA CONTACTS: Brian Thomson, WWF International, +41 79 477 3553, [email protected]. Martin Hiller, WWF Global Climate Change Programme, +41 79 347 2256, [email protected]. From 6 April 10 a.m. CET, find a detailed map on IPCC messages for over a hundred countries and regions at www.panda.org/climate/ipcc . Find stories and a map of WWF Climate Witnesses at www.panda.org/climatewitness Saving Nature’s Jewels from Climate Change - WWF Briefing Paper - 5 April 2007 1 BLEACHED AND DEAD? Around the Equator from the South Pacific to the Caribbean Sea WHAT? Contact: Coral reefs are home to 25% of all marine life, but comprise just 0.25% of all the ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Bering Sea: Ecosystem and Climate Change
    Northern Bering Sea and Bering Strait Ecosystem and Climate Change George Riggs, NASA Bering Sea Elders Group is an association of elders appointed by 39 participating tribes from the Kuskokwim Bay to the Bering Strait. Our mission is to speak and work together as one voice to protect and respect our traditional ways of life, the ocean web of life that supports the resources we rely on, and our children’s future. The Elders Group serves as a messenger to our children, tribal councils, and government decision-makers. Editing and production: Thomas Van Pelt / Transboundary Ecologic LLC Design: Eric Cline / TerraGraphica Mapping and imagery: Hunter Hadaway / Center for Environmental Visualization Front cover inset photos, left to right: James Barker, Andrew Trites, Jeff Wasley, Amelia Brower / NOAA Andrew Trites Introduction The cold, rich waters of the northern Bering Sea and Bering Strait form the foundation of One of the largest culture, food security, and economy for coastal Yupik and Inupiaq peoples, who have relied marine migrations on on the abundant marine resources of this region for thousands of years. Cultural practices associated with hunting and fishing bind people to the sea, and tie families and communities Earth moves through together through the passing of knowledge from one generation to the next. Alongside ongoing the northern Bering traditional uses are small-scale commercial fisheries for salmon, crab, herring, and halibut, which Sea and Bering are a vital component of regional employment and the cash economy. The seafloor and waters of this region are extraordinarily productive, and support a globally-significant diversity and abundance Strait each spring to of marine mammals, seabirds, and other ocean life.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10 Adjacent Seas of the Pacific Ocean Although The
    Chapter 10 Adjacent seas of the Pacific Ocean Although the adjacent seas of the Pacific Ocean do not impact much on the hydrography of the oceanic basins, they cover a substantial part of its area and deserve separate discussion. All are located along the western rim of the Pacific Ocean. From the point of view of the global oceanic circulation, the most important adjacent sea is the region on either side of the equator between the islands of the Indonesian archipelago. This region is the only mediterranean sea of the Pacific Ocean and is called the Australasian Mediterranean Sea. Its influence on the hydrography of the world ocean is far greater in the Indian than in the Pacific Ocean, and a detailed discussion of this important sea is therefore postponed to Chapter 13. The remaining adjacent seas can be grouped into deep basins with and without large shelf areas, and shallow seas that form part of the continental shelf. The Japan, Coral and Tasman Seas are deep basins without large shelf areas. The circulation and hydrography of the Coral and Tasman Seas are closely related to the situation in the western South Pacific Ocean and were already covered in the last two chapters; so only the Japan Sea will be discussed here. The Bering Sea, the Sea of Okhotsk, and the South China Sea are also deep basins but include large shelf areas as well. The East China Sea and Yellow Sea are shallow, forming part of the continental shelf of Asia. Other continental shelf seas belonging to the Pacific Ocean are the Gulf of Thailand and the Java Sea in South-East Asia and the Timor and Arafura Seas with the Gulf of Carpentaria on the Australian shelf.
    [Show full text]
  • XIV-46 Gulf of Alaska: LME #2
    XIV North East Pacific 617 XIV-46 Gulf of Alaska: LME #2 M.C. Aquarone and S. Adams The Gulf of Alaska LME lies off the southern coast of Alaska and the western coast of Canada. It is separated from the East Bering Sea LME by the Alaska Peninsula. The cold Subarctic Current, as it bifurcates towards the south, serves as the boundary between the Gulf of Alaska and the California Current LME. For a description of the Gulf of Alaska’s major currents, see www.pmel.noaa.gov/np/. The LME has a sub-Arctic climate and is subject to interannual and interdecadal climate variations (Brodeur et al. 1999). The area of this LME is about 1.5 million km², of which 1.50% is protected, and includes 0.52% of the world’s sea mounts (as defined in Sea Around Us 2007 and Kitchingman et al. 2007). There are 14 estuaries and river systems, including the Stikine River, Copper River, and Chatham Sound (Skeena River). A book chapter pertaining to this LME is by Brodeur et al. (1999). I. Productivity The Gulf of Alaska LME is considered a Class II, moderately productive ecosystem (150- 300 gCm-2yr-1). The LME’s cold, nutrient-rich waters support a biologically diverse ecosystem. Large-scale atmospheric and oceanographic conditions affect the productivity of this LME. Changes in zooplankton biomass have been observed in both the Gulf of Alaska LME and the adjacent California Current LME. These biomass changes appear to be inversely related to each other (Brodeur et al. 1999). A well-documented climatic regime shift occurring in the late 1970s caused the Alaska gyre to be centred more to the east (Lagerloef 1995, Anderson & Piatt 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Sea of Japan” Came Into Gradual Use and Acceptance in Europe from the 18Th Century
    The name “Sea of Japan” came into gradual use and acceptance in Europe from the 18th century. Sea of Japan More than 97% of maps used throughout the world display only the name “Sea of Japan”. Methods Used for Designating Geographical Names t is likely that the name “Sea of Japan” came to be Sea” (separated from the Indian Ocean by the Andaman generally accepted because of one geographical factor : Islands), the “Gulf of California” (separated from the this sea area is separated from the Northern Pacific southeastern part of the Northern Pacific Ocean by the by the Japanese Archipelago. California Peninsula), the “Irish Sea” (separated from the northeastern part of the North Atlantic Ocean by Ireland) As described above, western explorers explored this sea area and so on. (See Fig. 3.) from the late 18th century to the early 19th century and clarified the topographical features of the Sea of Japan. One of According to Kawai, the “East Sea” name advocated by them, Adam J. Krusenstern, wrote in his diary of the voyage, ROK is based upon another method of naming, a method “People also call this sea area the Sea of Korea, but because that names a sea area based upon a direction from a specific only a small part of this sea touches the Korean coast, it is country or region toward that sea area. Examples include the better to name it the Sea of Japan.” “North Sea” and the “East China Sea.” However, according to Kawai, a comparison of the naming methods used for the In fact, this sea area is surrounded by the Japanese “East Sea” and for the “Sea of Japan” shows that while the Archipelago in the eastern and the southern parts, and by the “East Sea” is a subjective name as viewed from the Asian Continent in its northern and western parts.
    [Show full text]
  • May 8, 2019 SUMMARY of SUBJECT MATTER TO
    Peter A. DeFazio Sam Graves Chairman Ranking Member Katherine W. Dedrick Paul J. Sass Staff Director Republican Staff Director May 8, 2019 SUMMARY OF SUBJECT MATTER TO: Members, Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation FROM: Staff, Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation RE: Hearing on “The Cost of Doing Nothing: Maritime Infrastructure Vulnerabilities in an Emerging Arctic.” _____________________________________________________________________________ PURPOSE The Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation will hold a hearing entitled “The Cost of Doing Nothing: Maritime Infrastructure Vulnerabilities in an Emerging Arctic” on Wednesday, May 8, 2019, at 2:00 p.m., in 2167 Rayburn House Office Building to examine the findings and recommendations of the recent report by the U.S. Committee on the Marine Transportation System (CMTS) entitled “Revising Near-Term Recommendations to the Prioritize Needs in the U.S. Arctic.” The Subcommittee will hear testimony from the U.S. Coast Guard (Coast Guard or Service), the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and experts on Arctic infrastructure. BACKGROUND The United States is an Arctic Nation. The U.S. Arctic, as defined in statute,1 encompasses U.S. territory north of the Arctic Circle with over 46,600 miles (75,000 km) of shoreline in Alaska, including the Aleutian Islands.2 Three Arctic seas – the Bering, the Chukchi, and the Beaufort – border Alaska; the U.S. Arctic Exclusive Economic Zone contains 568,000 square nautical miles (SNM), of which less than half is considered by NOAA to be “navigationally significant.” NOAA has designated 38,000 SNM of the navigationally significant areas as Arctic survey priority locations, 1 The Arctic Research and Policy Act of 1984, as amended (Public Law 98-373); The Arctic region is the area north of the Arctic Circle, North Latitude 66.5622°.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermohaline Structure and Water Masses in the Bering Sea
    Dynamics of the Bering Sea • 1999 61 CHAPTER 3 Thermohaline Structure and Water Masses in the Bering Sea Vladimir A. Luchin, Vladimir A. Menovshchikov, and Vladimir M. Lavrentiev Far Eastern Regional Hydrometeorological Research Institute (FERHI), Vladivostok, Russia Ronald K. Reed Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, Seattle, Washington Abstract Data from 35,700 hydrographic stations were grouped in areas of 1° lati- tude and 2° longitude and monthly, seasonal, and annual means calculat- ed. We examined temperature, salinity, and water masses of the Bering Sea, studying their vertical structure, temporal variability, and features of their spatial and temporal distribution. We also considered data from coastal observations, information on the meteorological regime, and river out- flow. Previous Investigations The first summaries of hydrographic research in the Bering Sea date from the previous century (Tanner 1890, Rathburn 1894). They contained gen- eral information about the temperature and salinity of the water. From 1906 to 1929, deepwater hydrographic work was not conducted; it was renewed only in the 1930s. Observations obtained during these years served as the basis for the work of Ratmanov (1937), who gave the first presentation of the distribution of temperature and salinity in the sea and the origins of the Anadyr and Olyutorsk cold zones. He also noted the interaction of waters from the northern part of the Pacific Ocean and the Bering Sea. The shallow-water regime of the northern and eastern parts of the sea were studied by Goodman et al. (1942). They used data from expeditions in 1937 and 1938. Leonov (1947, 1960) extended the research in the Ber- ing Sea to the start of the 1950s.
    [Show full text]