DOCSLIB.ORG

Hart Databook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hart Databook Hart Databook EMTAS About EMTAS Summary EMTAS Summary Information Ethnicity and Language EAL Language - Hampshire Summary - Pupils for whom English is an Additional Language (EAL) Summary by District and Academic Year EAL Graph Language - Hampshire Summary - Pupils for whom English is an Additional Language (EAL) Summary by District and Academic Year Lang Top 15 Language - Hart and Hampshire Summary - Pupils for whom English is an Additional Language (EAL) Top 15 Ethnicity Summary Ethnicity - Hart and Hampshire Summary - Pupils for whom English is an Additional Language (EAL) Summary by Ethnicity and Academic Year Ethnicity by District Ethnicity - Hampshire Summary - Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) pupils including those of Traveller Heritage Summary by District and Academic Year Ethnicity by District Graph Ethnicity - Hampshire Summary - Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) pupils including those of Traveller Heritage Bar Graph by District and Academic Year FSM & BME by Ethnicity Ethnicity - Hart and Hampshire Summary - Free School Meal (FSM) pupils who are also Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) pupils including those of Traveller Heritage Summary by Ethnicity and Academic Year FSM & BME by District Ethnicity - Hampshire Summary - Free School Meal (FSM) pupils who are also Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) pupils including those of Traveller Heritage Summary by District and Academic Year EMTAS New Arrival Referrals EMTAS Referrals EMTAS Referrals - Hart and Hampshire Summary - Pupils for whom English is an Additional Language (EAL) Summary by Language and Academic Year Index Hampshire Ethnic Minority and Traveller Achievement Service Data Information Booklet for Hart 2020 About EMTAS Removing barriers and inequalities in attainment and achievement is a priority for all schools. Working alongside Head Teachers and using our expert advice, guidance and training, we can support schools to close the performance gap and improve educational outcomes for children and young people from Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) and Traveller groups, including those learning English as an additional language (EAL). All our work is underpinned by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) particularly Articles 22, 29 and 30, and is supported by continuous professional development and enhanced DBS (Disclosing and Barring) checks. Core services we offer: • Baseline assessment (Profile Report) for children and young people at point of transfer into their new UK school. • Where appropriate, in-class support for children and young people for whom English is an additional language. • A full range of services to improve access, engagement and participation of Traveller children, young people and parents/carers. • Advice and training for teachers, senior leadership teams, EAL Co-ordinators, GRT Co-ordinators, Governors, Teaching Assistants and Office staff on all aspects of pedagogy, practice and provision for children at various stages of learning English as an additional language and their families. • OFSTED guidance, advice and training on closing gaps between the performance of Black and Minority Ethnic children, including Gypsy, Roma and Traveller children, and others. • EMTAS Specialist Teacher advice and support to develop and embed best practice. • Guidance on the delivery of the Hampshire Young Interpreter Scheme® and/or New Arrival Ambassador Scheme. • Resources: loan of books, dictionaries, Persona Dolls and artefacts. • Training: teachers, support staff and governors. • Phone line services for parents and practitioners in key languages. • Access to the EMTAS EAL/SEN and Traveller advice phone line services. • EMTAS e-learning modules. • Termly network meetings. • EAL Excellence Award • GRT Excellence Award Article 30 United Nation Convention on the Rights of the Child Every child has the right to learn and use the language, customs and religion of their family whether or not these are shared by the majority of the people in the country where they live. EMTAS EMTAS Summary Information According to the Spring 2020 School Census, 8% of Hampshire’s Black, Minority Ethnic and Traveller children were in Hart schools (taken from the ‘Ethnicity District’ tab). This equates to 2035 children in 2020, compared with 1934 in 2019, though the percentage has remained the same at 8% for both census years. Additionally, 6.8% of Hampshire’s EAL (English as an Additional Language) learners were in Hart which is equivalent to 739 children (729, 7.1% the previous year, 2019). In the academic year 2019-20 a total of 502 children were referred to Hampshire’s Ethnic Minority and Traveller Achievement Service. Of these, 28 children were referred by schools in the Hart district, compared with 54 in 2018- 19, due at least in part to the impact of the pandemic. The vast majority of referrals to EMTAS from schools in Hart were for children new to English. In the case of Traveller children, they were mainly new entrants to the school. Academic results for BME and Traveller groups are collected, analysed and reported on by Hampshire EMTAS annually. A summary analysis comparing the attainment and progress of BME and ‘Hampshire All’ is carried out in addition to more detailed analysis of attainment within individual groups and is made available separately. This data booklet shows demographic information for children from BME and Traveller backgrounds in Hart compared with the Hampshire All cohort. It captures a range of other information such as the percentage of children eligible for Free School Meals (FSM) and the changing profile of the district in terms of languages and ethnic groups. Within EMTAS, we recognise that different districts of Hampshire will have different needs according to the ethnic minority and Traveller profile of pupils, parents and communities. All data that have been used are correct at the time of writing but may later be subject to minor changes as new Census information is published. Dates and sources are acknowledged. In some cases, numbers within ethnic groups are very small. To maintain confidentiality, values of 5 or less are represented as <6 in accordance with DfE Statistical Policy Statement on Confidentiality (April 2013) Please note that where numbers are small, although they may suggest a pattern it is impossible to draw any firm conclusions. Therefore such data should be used with caution. Please get in touch with EMTAS should you have any questions or queries. We can be reached in the following ways: By phone: Office hours: 8.30am to 5pm, Monday to Thursday and 8.30am to 4.30pm, Friday (Term time only) 03707 794222 By e-mail: [email protected] Alternatively, please visit our website: www.hants.gov.uk/emtas Summary Language - Hampshire Summary - Pupils for whom English is an Additional Language (EAL) Summary by District and Academic Year Hart ranks sixth in terms of numbers of pupils with EAL in Hampshire. The number of pupils for whom English is an additional language in Hart has remained broadly similar over the last three census years with a small percentage decrease from 2019-20. 2020 2019 2018 Percentage Percentage Number of Number of Number of change from change from HIAS District Pupils % of All EAL Pupils % of All EAL Pupils % of All EAL 2019 to 2020 2018 to 2019 Basingstoke & Deane 2323 21.6% 2204 21.4% 2402 21.7% 0.2% -0.3% East Hampshire 593 5.5% 586 5.7% 659 5.9% -0.2% -0.2% Eastleigh 1073 9.9% 1030 10.0% 1066 9.6% -0.1% 0.4% Fareham 518 4.8% 466 4.5% 526 4.7% 0.3% -0.2% Gosport 406 3.7% 392 3.8% 438 3.9% -0.1% -0.1% Hart 739 6.8% 729 7.1% 785 7.1% -0.3% 0.0% Havant 697 6.4% 684 6.7% 675 6.1% -0.3% 0.6% New Forest 707 6.5% 693 6.7% 743 6.7% -0.2% 0.0% Rushmoor 1786 16.6% 1642 16.0% 1841 16.6% 0.6% -0.6% Test Valley 1082 10.0% 1029 10.0% 1086 9.8% 0.0% 0.2% Winchester 822 7.6% 813 7.9% 872 7.9% -0.3% 0.0% EAL 10746 100.0% 10268 100.0% 11093 100.0% ** Data are from HCC Spring 2020 School Census - 12/03/2020 Notes: EAL pupils are those not in English (ENG), Believed to be English (ENB), British Sign Language (BSL), Information Not Obtained (NOBT), Refused (REF) and Classification Pending (ZZZ) Includes pupils in all Hampshire Primary, Secondary and Special schools (including Academies) Excludes Education Centres and pupils placed out of County Hampshire data sourced from the 2018, 2019 and 2020 Spring School Censuses EAL Language - Hampshire Summary - Pupils for whom English is an Additional Language (EAL) Summary by District and Academic Year ** Data are from HCC Spring 2020 School Census - 12/03/2020 Number of EAL Pupils 3000 ` 2500 2000 1500 2020 2019 1000 2018 500 0 Notes: • EAL pupls are those not in English (ENG), Believed to be English (ENB), British Sign Language (BSL), Information Not Obtained (NOBT), Refused (REF) and Classifcation Pending (ZZZ) • Ethnic Group and language(s) spoken are defined by parents and/or pupils (if over the age of 11) • Includes all Hampshire part time and full time pupils with a single registration (or main registration if dual registered) • Hampshire data sourced from the Spring School Censuses • EAL figures produced by DaIT Universal Team only include pupils of a compulsory school age (ie 5 and over) EAL Graph Language - Hart and Hampshire Summary - Pupils for whom English is an Additional Language (EAL) Top 15 Census languages have been fairly consistent since 2018. Polish has vyed with Nepali as the top language in Hart since 2018, overtaking Nepali for the first time in 2019. These two languages represent just over 17% of the total EAL population of Hart. Language data are collected termly; ethnicity data are collected in the Spring Term only. Accurate recording of pupils’ home/first languages enables better targeting of additional resources.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Progress Summary
    CLIMATE EMERGENCY PROGRESS CHECKLIST - 10 December 2019 NB. This is work in progress! We have almost certainly missed some actions. Please contact [email protected] with any news or updates. County/Authority Council Status County/Authority Council Status Brighton & Hove BRIGHTON & HOVE CITY COUNCIL DECLARED Dec 2018 KENT COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed May 2019 WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed - April 2019 Ashford Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 Adur Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Canterbury City Council DECLARED July 2019 Arun District Council DECLARED Nov 2019 Dartford Borough Council DECLARED Oct 2019 Chichester City Council DECLARED June 2019 Dover District Council Campaign in progress West Sussex Chichester District Council DECLARED July 2019 Folkestone and Hythe District Council DECLARED July 2019 Crawley Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Gravesham Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Kent Horsham District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Maidstone Borough Council DECLARED April 2019 Mid Sussex District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Medway Council DECLARED April 2019 Worthing Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Sevenoaks District Council Motion Passed - Nov 2019 EAST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL DECLARED Oct 2019 Swale Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Eastbourne Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Thanet District Council DECLARED July 2019 Hastings Borough Council DECLARED Dec 2018 Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 East Sussex Lewes District Council DECLARED July 2019 Tunbridge
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Market Partnership for Hart District Council, Rushmoor Borough
    Housing Market Partnership for the administrative areas of Hart, Rushmoor and Surrey Heath Terms of Reference (Version 3) Purpose 1. To ensure the Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessments are robust and credible in that they will deliver the core outputs and follow the process checklist as appended 2. To receive and consider reports from commissioned consultants (where appropriate) and feedback from the wider stakeholder group 3. To share and pool information and intelligence, including relevant contextual intelligence and policy information on housing land availability, housing market and financial data 4. To support core members in the analysis and interpretation of the assessment data 5. To consider the implications of the assessments, including signing off the assessment reports, core outputs and agreeing follow up action 6. To agree a process by which the SHLAA findings can be regularly reviewed Membership At its outset, the membership will comprise representatives from the following bodies: Hart District Council Rushmoor Borough Council Surrey Heath Borough Council Berkeley Homes Barton Willmore Mitchell and Partners Gregory Gray Associates Annington Property Ltd Barratt Southern Counties Mitchell and Partners Re-Format Architects Sentinel HA Accent Peerless First Wessex Housing Lovell Partnerships The Rund Partnership Rippon Development Services MGA Planning Rio Homes and Estates These are the organisations that attended either the first meeting, the second meeting, or both. Other key stakeholders1 can join the partnership should they wish to do so by contacting either Hart District Council, Rushmoor Borough Council, or Surrey Heath Borough Council. New members will be invited as necessary to ensure that the housing market area is represented with at least one house builder and preferably with other key stakeholders such as local property and planning agents, Registered Social Landlords and key landowners.
    [Show full text]
  • Nexus June 2021
    N E W S F R O M T H E H A M P S H I R E C V S NETWORK Action Nexus Hampshire VOLUME 8, ISSUE 6 18 JUNE 2021 Basingstoke Voluntary Action BVA Celebrating Volunteers Communities First Wessex BVA had a blast spearheading their Volunteers’ Week campaign, celebrating the contribution Gosport Voluntary volunteers have made to the local community. Action They called out to their members to nominate Hart Voluntary people who deserve a token of appreciation and Action received over 100 responses back regarding One volunteers who deserve to be recognised Community for their excellent work. Rushmoor BVA’s token of appreciation Voluntary scheme involved bringing partners Services together, which included liaising with the Unity mayor’s office to pull together personalised letters of appreciation, as well as the Basingstoke Loddon Rotary, to Page 2 help deliver these letters and tokens of Hart’s Green Garden appreciation to households across the Gosport’s Cultural borough. Working in conjunction with Consortium these partners meant that BVA’s scheme Page 3 was a great success – every volunteer that was nominated received both their token and letter. £2,00 Lottery winner in Gosport Traditionally, BVA celebrates Volunteers’ Week in the form of an afternoon tea, but due to restrictions this time around, they had to think outside Addressing volunteer resilience in Test the box. Reaching out to the community meant that they managed to get just Valley under 100 volunteers nominated from a wide variety of good causes. Rushmoor’s Grub The BVA Team thought that it would be a good idea to share how so Hub many others got involved throughout Volunteers’ Week, by showcasing a Page 4 fantastic range of photos and good news stories across their social media.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authorities Involved in LAD2, Organised Into County Area Consortia for the Purpose of the Scheme
    Local Authorities involved in LAD2, organised into county area consortia for the purpose of the scheme. Bedfordshire Bedford Borough Central Bedfordshire Luton Borough Milton Keynes Berkshire Bracknell Forest Reading Slough West Berkshire Windsor & Maidenhead Wokingham Buckinghamshire Buckinghamshire Council Cambridge Cambridge City East Cambridgeshire District Fenland District Council Huntingdonshire District Peterborough City Council South Cambridgeshire District East Sussex Eastbourne Borough Hastings Borough Lewes District Rother District Council Wealden District Council Essex Basildon Braintree Brentwood Borough Council Castle Point Chelmsford Colchester Epping Forest Harlow Maldon Rochford Southend on Sea Tendring Thurrock Uttlesford District Hampshire Basingstoke & Deane Borough Council East Hampshire District Council Hart District Council Rushmoor Borough Council Test Valley Borough Council Winchester City Council Hertfordshire Broxbourne Borough Dacorum Borough East Herts District Council Hertsmere Borough North Hertfordshire District St Albans City & District Stevenage Borough Three Rivers District Watford Borough Welwyn Hatfield Borough Kent Ashford Borough Council Canterbury City Council Dartford Borough Council Dover District Council Folkestone & Hythe District Council Gravesham Borough Council Maidstone Borough Council Medway Council Sevenoaks District Council Swale Borough Council Thanet District Council Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council Tunbridge Wells Borough Council London Barking & Dagenham Bexley Bromley Camden City
    [Show full text]
  • Hart District Council Hart Local Plan Strategy and Sites 2016-2032
    Hart District Council Hart Local Plan Strategy and Sites 2016-2032 - Examination 3/12/18 Matter 4: Question raised regarding where people living in the new settlement will come from? 1. During the Matter 4 discussion the inspector posed the question “Where will the people come from that will live in the new settlement?” 2. The attached paper provides an analysis on UK Domestic in-Migration to Hart District for Year to end July 2017. 3. We assume the question has been posed because the Plan meets OAHN without the new settlement, and so if a new settlement comes forward within the Plan period, it is relevant to consider the impact on in-migration? 4. If this is the reasoning behind the question, then one must take into account the front- loaded nature of the trajectory. In the first half of the plan period anticipated delivery in Hart will exceed OAHN, by virtue of committed developments. If one assumes that housing provided over and above OAHN will draw additional people into the HMA from other areas, then one can assume that is what will happen in the first half of the Plan period. 5. In the second half of the Plan period, the trajectory falls short of the annualised level of OAHN with the implication that Hart District will then export people to other HMAs, unless housing supply is boosted; the preferred means of which is the new settlement. 6. If a new settlement DPD is found sound, it will set the principle of development and the detailed policy framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Violent Crime and Public Disorder in Hampshire, UK (2009)
    SUMMARY Reducing violent crime and disorder in Hampshire UK Scanning Since 2004, increases in alcohol related public place violent crime and disorder in the UK were a matter for public disquiet. There were serious effects upon the economy and in public confidence. In 2006, an agreement was made between HM Government, Hampshire County Council, Hampshire Constabulary and partners to achieve more demanding performance targets. They agreed to ‘stretch’ the existing target for the year 2009, to 25.3% lower than the 2004/5 crime level. A financial incentive was at the heart of the agreement. In 2007, a Co-ordinator was appointed to assist three Hampshire Constabulary, Operational Command Units (those in the County area) to achieve their target. The Co-ordinator had developed a methodology to make problem solving routine. Analysis Progress had been made between 2006/7.The identified problem and responses were reviewed. Reductions had been achieved through enforcement and education; further analysis indicated potential challenges to continued progress using these tactics. Areas of work and locality were identified. Further analysis found 10% of streets where violent crime occurred hosted 54% of that crime. Seventy-two streets represented 17% of crime where crime levels exceeded fifty in a year. This provided the best opportunities for success by tackling the issues in certain streets. Secondary analysis highlighted sixteen issues that could act against ensuring problem solving success. Response A strategy was developed to address the issues and get a routine problem solving approach embedded into management response, as well as police and partnership practice to tackle long term and rising problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening up Costs of Strategic Sites
    Further documentation for SSDC CIL examiner Mike Fox As per Mike Fox’s request, I attach below a table of ‘opening up’ costs for strategic sites (200 units+) collated by Savills from HBF member developers in relation to other CIL examinations around the country. The Scheme Enabling & Abnormal works are broadly in line with the range of £17k-£23k per plot identified in the Harman report (bearing in mind that document was published 4 years ago and, as has been evidenced, build costs have risen since that time). It is our view that a cost of this type should be included in CIL viability tests for all the SUE’s. Number Region Local Authority Affordable Net: to £ per unit Gross Scheme Scheme Total Enabling & Mitigation Site Abnormals (S. 106) Works 200 - 500 units 1 YH East Riding of Yorkshire 25% 68% £18,112 £808 £18,920 2 NE Northumberland 30% 66% £7,824 £2,100 £9,924 3 YH Barnsley 0% 82% £15,422 £3,339 £18,761 4 SW Exeter City Council 53% 82% £22,302 £6,854 £29,156 5 SW South Hams District Council 25% 71% £16,738 £5,225 £21,963 6 NW Telford & Wrekin 25% 52% £15,238 £2,865 £18,103 7 NE North Tyneside 25% 77% £8,765 £8,888 £17,653 8 NW Tameside 0% 91% £3,616 £1,500 £5,116 9 YH Wakefield 30% - £13,827 £7,657 £21,484 10 WM Wychavon 7% 75% £25,823 £3,288 £29,111 11 NE Redcar and Cleveland 15% 73% £6,170 £4,021 £10,191 12 NW Cheshire East 16% 87% £3,232 £2,210 £5,442 13 NW Telford & Wrekin 15% 84% £18,264 £7,289 £25,553 14 SE Basingstoke & Deane 40% 62% £17,571 £18,606 £36,177 15 NW Preston City Council 30% 68% £21,269 £2,398 £23,667 16 EE Babergh
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Summary 250520
    CLIMATE EMERGENCY PROGRESS CHECKLIST - 25 May 2020 NB. This is work in progress! We have almost certainly missed some actions. Please contact [email protected] with any news or updates. County/Authority Council Status County/Authority Council Status Brighton & Hove BRIGHTON & HOVE CITY COUNCIL DECLARED Dec 2018 KENT COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed May 2019 WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed - April 2019 Ashford Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 Adur Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Canterbury City Council DECLARED July 2019 Arun District Council DECLARED Nov 2019 Dartford Borough Council DECLARED Oct 2019 Chichester City Council DECLARED June 2019 Dover District Council DECLARED Jan 2020 West Sussex Chichester District Council DECLARED July 2019 Folkestone and Hythe District Council DECLARED July 2019 Crawley Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Gravesham Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Kent Horsham District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Maidstone Borough Council DECLARED April 2019 Mid Sussex District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Medway Council DECLARED April 2019 Worthing Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Sevenoaks District Council Motion Passed - Nov 2019 EAST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL DECLARED Oct 2019 Swale Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Eastbourne Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Thanet District Council DECLARED July 2019 Hastings Borough Council DECLARED Dec 2018 Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 East Sussex Lewes District Council DECLARED July 2019 Tunbridge Wells
    [Show full text]
  • Hampshire Homelessness Referral Protocol
    Hampshire Homelessness Referral Protocol !DIBasingstoke wand Deane t HtiW3 hire DJSTRTCT mUNCIL EASTLEIGH BOROUGH COUNCIL FAREHAM HOUSING CITYSOUTHAMPTON COUNCIL Working in partnership .£ift:\__GOSPORT - Borough Council Portsmouth II CITY COUNCIL UANewForesto1srR1cr COUNCIL BOROUGHHavant COUNCIL 1 u1, /� JSLEo1/ -.......... ' W I G H T .........../ C O U N C I L 1 Hampshire Homelessness Referral Protocol Hampshire Homelessness Referral Protocol I 1 Aims of protocol The Homelessness Reduction Act 2017 calls for new referral and joint working arrangements between housing authorities and other public sector authorities in the prevention and relief of homelessness. This protocol sets out how local authorities within Hampshire and public authorities operating in the local areas will work together to prevent homelessness and the procedures to be followed in making referrals of individuals identified as being homeless or at risk of homelessness. I 2 Background The Homelessness Reduction Act 2017 came into force on 3 April 2018 and significantly reformed homelessness legislation by placing duties on local authorities to intervene at earlier stages to prevent homelessness in their areas. It requires housing authorities to provide homelessness services to all those affected, not just those who have 'priority need'. These include: 1. (a) an enhanced prevention duty extending the period a household is threatened with homelessness from 28 days to 56 days, meaning that housing authorities are required to work with people to prevent homelessness at an earlier stage; and 2. (b) a new duty for those who are already homeless so that housing authorities will support households for 56 days to relieve their homelessness by helping them to secure accommodation.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Comperhensive Plan
    Bracknell Forest Council Duty to Co-operate Framework February 2016 Contents 1 Introduction.............................................................................................................. 2 1.1 The Duty to Co-operate .................................................................................... 2 1.2 Purpose of this Framework ............................................................................... 4 1.3 Consultation ..................................................................................................... 4 2 Strategic Matters for Co-operation ........................................................................... 5 2.1 Homes, Jobs and Commercial Development .................................................... 5 2.1.1 Housing Including Gypsies and Travellers ................................................. 5 2.1.2 Economic Growth and Jobs ....................................................................... 6 2.1.3 Retail and Town Centres ........................................................................... 6 2.2 Provision of infrastructure ................................................................................. 7 2.2.1 Strategic Transport .................................................................................... 7 2.2.2 Utilities ...................................................................................................... 7 2.2.3 Community Facilities Including Health and Education................................ 8 2.2.4 Flood Risk Infrastructure ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Material: the Status of Pet Rabbit Breeding and Online Sales in the UK: a Glimpse Into an Otherwise Elusive Industry
    Supplementary Material: The Status of Pet Rabbit Breeding and Online Sales in the UK: A Glimpse into an Otherwise Elusive Industry Emma Gosling 1 *, Jorge A. Vázquez-Diosdado 2 and Naomi D. Harvey 2, 1 University of Winchester, Winchester, Hampshire, SO22 4NR; [email protected] (E.G) 2 School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, The University of Nottingham, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK; [email protected] (N.D.H.); [email protected] (J.A.V-D) * Correspondence: [email protected] Supplementary Table S1. Freedom of information (FOI) request key dates Council Name 1st FOI Sent 1st Response 2nd FOI Sent 2nd Received Response Received Boston Borough Council 12.05.2017 17.05.2017 25.05.2018 30.05.2018 Erewash Borough Council 12.05.2017 17.05.2017 25.05.2018 21.06.2018 Devon County Council 12.05.2017 16.05.2017 - - Broadland District 12.05.2017 12.06.2017 25.05.2018 04.06.2018 Council Hart District Council 12.05.2017 17.05.2017 25.05.2018 05.06.2018 Cherwell District Council 12.05.2017 25.05.2018 06.06.2018 Aberdeen City Council 12.05.2017 22.05.2017 25.05.2018 22.06.2018 Chelmsford Borough 12.05.2017 12.06.2017 25.05.2018 21.06.2018 Council Eden District Council 12.05.2017 17.05.2017 25.05.2018 30.05.2018 Harborough District 12.05.2017 22.05.2017 25.05.2018 29.05.2018 Council Caerphilly County 12.05.2017 09.06.2017 25.05.2018 31.05.2018 Borough Council Havant Borough Council 12.05.2017 16.05.2017 25.05.2018 25.05.2018 Aylesbury Vale District 12.05.2017 18.05.2017 25.05.2018 16.06.2018 Council Clackmannashire
    [Show full text]
  • Pwc Solent Authorities
    www.pwc.co.uk Final Solent Authorities Devolution and the future of local government Confidential November 2016 Devolution and the future of local government in the Solent Final Contents Important notice .......................................................................................................................... 1 Executive summary..................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 11 1.1. Purpose of this report 11 1.2. Hampshire and the Isle of Wight 11 1.3. Solent authorities 13 1.4. Local Economies 14 1.5. Local government in Hampshire and the Isle of Wight 17 1.6. The recent evolution of local government 19 1.7. The case for change and the Solent Devolution Deal 23 1.8. The path to devolution 24 2. Unitary authority options ...................................................................................................... 27 2.1. The unitary authority options considered 27 2.2. Status quo (baseline) 28 2.3. Three unitary authorities 28 2.4. Five unitary authorities 29 2.5. Commentary 30 3. Providing value for money and delivering positive outcomes ............................................... 31 3.1. Approach 31 3.2. Baseline 31 3.3. Disaggregation of County Council income and expenditure 33 3.4. Economy and efficiency 34 3.5. Summary Results 35 3.6. Payback period 37 3.7. Council tax harmonisation 38 3.8. Summary and conclusions from value for money and cost of transition analysis 38 4. Strong local leadership and accountability........................................................................... 40 4.1. Local government reform and the opportunity to strengthen leadership and accountability 40 4.2. Clarifying accountability 40 4.3. Ensuring simplicity 46 4.4. A Mayoral combined authority 46 4.5. Summary and conclusions 46 Devolution and the future of local government in the Solent Final 5.
    [Show full text]