DOCSLIB.ORG

Egyptology in the Periphery Valdemar Schmidt and the Making of Egyptology in Denmark 1872–1925

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Egyptology in the Periphery Valdemar Schmidt and the Making of Egyptology in Denmark 1872–1925 Lunds Universitet Historiska Institutionen HISS33 Examiner: Yvonne Maria Werner Supervisor: David Larsson Heidenblad Seminary: 2019-09-27, kl. 13.15–15.00, LUX:B429 Egyptology in the Periphery Valdemar Schmidt and the making of Egyptology in Denmark 1872–1925 Andreas Alm Abstract Egyptology in the 19th and early 20th centuries developed simultaneously with increased imperial presence in Egypt by the European imperial powers, which would have influence on how the discipline was practised. The history of Egyptology has for this reason primarily focused on the big four – Great Britain, France, Germany and USA – and on Egypt itself. The aim of this study is to examine how Egyptology was established and practised in a non- imperial Scandinavian country – Denmark. Through the agency of Valdemar Schmidt, the initiator of the Egyptology at the University of Copenhagen, I ask the following 3 questions; (1) How did Valdemar Schmidt practise Egyptology? (2) What was his working relation to Egypt and the rest of Europe? (3) Are there any changes over time, and if so, what were they? Several results can be shown. First, I argue that Schmidt, as the first academic Egyptologist in Denmark, was profoundly influenced by prehistoric archaeology and comparative linguistics, both with Danish roots in the first half of the 19th century. This affected his scientific views in that he believed in using a quantity of sources, even those which many would regard as trivial in order to reconstruct the past. This focus on the small and trivial has previously been attributed to William Matthew Flinders Petrie at least 15 years after Schmidt, and it has been proposed he had done so as for practical purposes as it was easier to take smaller objects out of Egypt and distribute between the subscribers. I argue, in the case of Schmidt, that the way he practised Egyptology was in many ways unpractical and costly, indicating he was more shaped by the scientific ideals of the national context he worked in. I show how most of the primary and secondary sources needed for his practise were not found in Denmark but were spread in several collections and libraries all over the world. Schmidt spent a large part of his career travelling to museums and studying museum objects to acquire knowledge which he later would communicate to a Danish audience through his many public lectures. I also argue his museum studies should be regarded as fieldwork as he was on a time constrain and tried to make the most of the time he had by, for example, travel at night and never eating anything during the museums opening hours. In the case of Egyptology, I show how Denmark could be considered belonging to a European periphery. It was hard to get access to books and materials needed. Much of Schmidt´s practise therefore aimed to upheave this sense of periphery and create a milieu in Denmark where Egyptology could be studied. I also argue that Schmidt initially did not consider Egypt itself central to his practise compared to several European museums. This would eventually change as he got involved in the antiquities trade around 1890. The outbreak of the World War I affected his practise inasmuch he was cut off from access to the European museums and libraries that he needed for his studies. From this I argue Danish Egyptology relied on access to Europe to be able to function. World War I also broke down the ideals of scientific universalism in the warring countries, but as an Egyptologist from a neutral country, Schmidt still regarded international cooperation crucial and expected everything to turn back to normal as soon as the war was over. Finally, I show how Egyptology in Denmark was not a financially rewarding career. Even with state support, Schmidt had to spend much of his own money on the acquisition of source material and publishing. Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose of Study ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Research Questions ............................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Theoretical framework – The practise of Egyptology ............................................................................... 3 1.4 Method and sources ............................................................................................................................... 6 1.4.1 Translation ...................................................................................................................................... 8 1.5 Disposition and demarcation .................................................................................................................. 9 1.6 State of the field ................................................................................................................................... 10 1.7 History of Egyptology ............................................................................................................................ 16 1.7.2 Short introduction to Valdemar Schmidt ........................................................................................ 19 2.1 The Foundations of Danish Egyptology (1872 – 1882) ............................................................................... 20 2.2 Trivial objects and comparative archaeology ......................................................................................... 21 2.3 Museum studies, publishing and International cooperation ................................................................... 28 2.4 The universal historian .......................................................................................................................... 35 2.5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................ 38 3.1 The Golden Age (1882 – 1914) .................................................................................................................. 40 3.2 The manifold educator .......................................................................................................................... 40 3.2.1 Unwrapping the mummy ............................................................................................................... 42 3.3 Fieldwork in the museums..................................................................................................................... 47 3.4 The scholar and the Museum – Involvement with Glyptoteket ............................................................... 56 3.5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................ 61 4.1 Egyptology disrupted (1914 – 1925) ......................................................................................................... 63 4.2 Magnum Opus ...................................................................................................................................... 63 4.3 The War and its aftermath .................................................................................................................... 69 4.4 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................ 80 5.1 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................ 81 5.1.1 Further research ........................................................................................................................... 84 6.1 References................................................................................................................................................ 85 6.1.1 Books and articles by Valdemar Schmidt ............................................................................................ 85 6.1.2 Letters ............................................................................................................................................... 85 6.1.3 Newspaper articles ............................................................................................................................ 87 6.1.4 Secondary Literature .......................................................................................................................... 88 6.1.5 Front cover ........................................................................................................................................ 92 1. Introduction Today most people have some sort of concept of ancient Egypt. Thinking of it might bring images of pyramids, mummies, and sphinxes to mind. Yet this has not always been the case. The study of ancient Egypt through the scholarly discipline of Egyptology has a history in and of itself, and the interest in the results achieved by Egyptologists took off in the second half of the 19th century. Ancient Egypt and Egyptians got tied into all kinds of discussions about race, science, history and religion in the 19th and 20th centuries in a way which perhaps many modern historians have not always fully appreciated. As historian David Gange pointed out “almost every major figure of the second half of the nineteenth century, from Gladstone to Darwin,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Catalogue of Place Names in Northern East Greenland
    Catalogue of place names in northern East Greenland In this section all officially approved, and many Greenlandic names are spelt according to the unapproved, names are listed, together with explana- modern Greenland orthography (spelling reform tions where known. Approved names are listed in 1973), with cross-references from the old-style normal type or bold type, whereas unapproved spelling still to be found on many published maps. names are always given in italics. Names of ships are Prospectors place names used only in confidential given in small CAPITALS. Individual name entries are company reports are not found in this volume. In listed in Danish alphabetical order, such that names general, only selected unapproved names introduced beginning with the Danish letters Æ, Ø and Å come by scientific or climbing expeditions are included. after Z. This means that Danish names beginning Incomplete documentation of climbing activities with Å or Aa (e.g. Aage Bertelsen Gletscher, Aage de by expeditions claiming ‘first ascents’ on Milne Land Lemos Dal, Åkerblom Ø, Ålborg Fjord etc) are found and in nunatak regions such as Dronning Louise towards the end of this catalogue. Å replaced aa in Land, has led to a decision to exclude them. Many Danish spelling for most purposes in 1948, but aa is recent expeditions to Dronning Louise Land, and commonly retained in personal names, and is option- other nunatak areas, have gained access to their al in some Danish town names (e.g. Ålborg or Aalborg region of interest using Twin Otter aircraft, such that are both correct). However, Greenlandic names be - the remaining ‘climb’ to the summits of some peaks ginning with aa following the spelling reform dating may be as little as a few hundred metres; this raises from 1973 (a long vowel sound rather than short) are the question of what constitutes an ‘ascent’? treated as two consecutive ‘a’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Life-Forms of Terrestrial 'Flowering Plants
    ACTA PHYTOGEOGRAPHICA SUECICA EDIDJT SVENSKA VAXTGEOGRAFISKA SALLSKAPET m:1 LIFE-FORMS OF TERRESTRIAL ' FLOWERING PLANTS I BY G. EINAR Du RIETZ UPPSALA 1931 ALMQVIST & WIKSELLS BOKTRYCKERI AB ' ACTA PHYTOGEOGRAPHICA SUECICA. III. LIFE-FORMS OF TERRESTRIAL FLOWERING PLANTS BY G. EINAR DU RIETZ PRINTED WITH CONTRIBUTION FH.OM LA :\GMAN S KA I{ U LTU HFON DEN UPPSALA 193 1 ALMQVIST & WIKSELLS BOK'l'RYCKERI-A.-B. Preface. This work is the result of studies carried out during the last twelve years. The field-studies have been made partly in various parts of Scandinavia (Sweden and Norway), partly during a year's work in New Zealand and .Australia in 1926-1927 as well as during shorter visits to various parts of Central and Western Europe, North America, and Java. The material collected in the field has been worked up in the Plant-Biological Institution of Upsala Uni­ versity. The rich life-form collections of this institution have also been utilized as much as possible. I wish to express my deep gratitude to all those frien�s in various countries who have supported my work in one way or another - they are too many to be enumerated here. l have tried to bring the names of the plants mentioned as much as possible into accordance with the following generally known :florjstic handbooks : For Scandinavia Ho LMBERG 1922-1926, and, for the groups not treated there, LIND- 1\IAN 1926, for Central Europe HEGI 1908--1931, for the eastern part of North .America RoBINSON and FF.RNALD 1908, for Java KooR DERS 191 1-1912, for N�w South Wales MooRE and BE T C H E 1893, for the rest of Australia BENTHAM 1863- 1878, and for New Zealand CHEESEMAN 1925.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Wilhelm Lund: O Auge Das Suas Investigações Científicas E a Razão Para O Término Das Pesquisas Pedro Ernesto De Luna Filho
    Peter Wilhelm Lund: o auge das suas investigações científicas e a razão para o término das pesquisas Pedro Ernesto de Luna Filho To cite this version: Pedro Ernesto de Luna Filho. Peter Wilhelm Lund: o auge das suas investigações científicas e a razão para o término das pesquisas. History. Universidade de São Paulo, 2007. Portuguese. tel-00289537 HAL Id: tel-00289537 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00289537 Submitted on 21 Jun 2008 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO FACULDADE DE FILOSOFIA, LETRAS E CIÊNCIAS HUMANAS DEPARTAMENTO DE HISTÓRIA PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM HISTÓRIA SOCIAL PETER WILHELM LUND: O AUGE DAS SUAS INVESTIGAÇÕES CIENTÍFICAS E A RAZÃO PARA O TÉRMINO DAS SUAS PESQUISAS Pedro Ernesto de Luna Filho Tese apresentada ao Programa de Pós- Graduação em História Social, do Departamento de História da Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas da Universidade de São Paulo, para obtenção do título de Doutor em História. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Shozo Motoyama São Paulo 2007 2 UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO FACULDADE DE FILOSOFIA, LETRAS E CIÊNCIAS HUMANAS DEPARTAMENTO DE HISTÓRIA PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM HISTÓRIA SOCIAL PETER WILHELM LUND: O AUGE DAS SUAS INVESTIGAÇÕES CIENTÍFICAS E A RAZÃO PARA O TÉRMINO DAS SUAS PESQUISAS Pedro Ernesto de Luna Filho São Paulo 2007 3 4 AGRADECIMENTOS Como muitas teses de doutoramento, este trabalho já teve várias formas, questionamentos e direcionamentos até assumir sua forma final.
    [Show full text]
  • Darwin and the Divine Experiment Religious Responses to Darwin in Denmark 1859Á1909
    Studia Theologica 63 (2009), pp. 140Á161 Darwin and the divine experiment Religious responses to Darwin in Denmark 1859Á1909 Niels Henrik Gregersen and Peter C. Kjærgaard In Denmark Darwin’s theory of evolution was known early on and viewed with respect, but did not make immediate scientific converts. In the 1870s, when Darwinism was promoted by free thinkers, public debates began to flourish, but religious reactions were remarkably few and mostly undramatic. Since natural theology was not assumed by Lutheran theologians, the issue of design vs. chance was not prevalent. Discussions focused rather on scripture and the general challenge of naturalism, and if Darwin’s name was included, the concern was human uniqueness and the social consequences of Darwinism. Religious responses thus targeted the materialism of semi-popular Darwinism more than the substance of Darwin’s theory. Around 1900, however, many aspects of Darwin’s theory were accepted. At that time, however, leading biologists found that Darwin’s theory needed to be complemented by a Lamarckian emphasis on environment and adaptation. Theologians who were prepared to rethink Christianity in the light of evolution usually followed this trend. Darwin was domesticated, and brought home to the Danish public as part of the common cultural canon. In this article we analyze varieties of religious responses to Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution in Denmark. How did theologians and revivalist groups react to Darwin’s On the Origin of Species from its publication in 1859 up to 1909, when Darwin’s 100th birthday was Downloaded By: [Det Kgl Bibl Natl bibl og Kbh Univ bibl] At: 08:47 2 February 2010 celebrated? In what sense did the Danish situation differ from that of other countries, for example England? And how did the domestic religious traditions influence the Danish reception of Darwin? As recent scholarship has shown, context is essential when it comes to the reception of Darwin’s theory.1 In England Darwin’s work appeared in the religious climate of Victorian Anglicanism.
    [Show full text]
  • Biologismer Jes Fabricius Møller
    Biologismer Jes Fabricius Møller To cite this version: Jes Fabricius Møller. Biologismer. Other [q-bio.OT]. University of Copenhagen, 2003. Danish. tel- 00271548 HAL Id: tel-00271548 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00271548 Submitted on 9 Apr 2008 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Biologismer naturvidenskab og politik ca. 1850-1930 ph.d.-afhandling af Jes Fabricius Møller under vejledning af professor dr.phil. Inga Floto Det humanistiske Fakultet, Københavns Universitet 2002 1 Indholdsfortegnelse Indledning s. 4 Guds død og videnskabens sejr s. 9 Ateisme og sækularisering s. 9 Hegel – Ranke – Renan s. 10 Nietzsche s. 15 Fire betydninger af Guds død s. 19 Videnskabens sejr s. 23 Ekskurs om Franz Howitz s. 33 Politik og videnskab – videnskab og politik s. 41 Eksemplet medicin s. 41 Eksemplet biologi og socialdarwinisme s. 52 Ekskurs om C.J. Kayser s. 60 Metafor-fortolkning som læsestrategi s. 64 Den organiske metafor i det 19. århundrede s. 74 Den konservative tolkning s. 75 Fichtes nationalisme s. 77 Den sene enevældes opbrud s. 79 Liberalisme og hygiejnen s. 83 Den reale analogi s. 85 Evolution og organisme – sociologiens afhængighed af biologien s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Academy and Biological Sciences
    The Academy and the Biological Sciences The Academy has played a major role in promot­ ing research projects in the humanities and applied physics. Its influence on biological research has been less direct. By electing the Board of Directors of the Carlsberg Foundation, it has, however, influenced the biological sciences in a decisive way. Up to the Second World War the development of biochemistry in Denmark was more or less synonymous with the research carried out at the Carlsberg Laboratory. Also, genetics and cell biology in this country owe a great deal to that laboratory. The Laboratory consists of two sections, a Department of Chemistry and a Department of Physiology, which happen to have had men of great talent as leaders. The Foundation chooses from among its own Board members three natural scientists who, together with two adjunct mem­ bers, consitute the Board of Trustees of the Carls­ berg Laboratory. Although connected with a large industrial enterprise, research in the Carlsberg Laboratories has largely been of a basic and fun­ damental nature; but applied research has also been carried out. All the heads of departments of the Carlsberg Laboratory throughout its existence have been members of the Academy. There are two periods in which biological 55 research has flourished in Denmark, these being the second half of the 17th century and, some 300 years later, in the present century. ANATOMISTS The first period of biological research in Denmark, which occurred before the founding of the Academy but should nevertheless be mentioned, was dominated by the scholars Thomas Bartho­ lin (1616-1680) and Niels Stensen (Nicolaus Steno) (1638—1686).
    [Show full text]
  • Historyof Sciences
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Crossref CMYK RGB Tribute to Christian Theodor Vaupell Hist. Geo Space Sci., 3, 143–150, 2012 History of www.hist-geo-space-sci.net/3/143/2012/ Geo- and Space doi:10.5194/hgss-3-143-2012 © Author(s) 2012. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Access Open Sciences Advances in Science & Research Open Access Proceedings Christian Theodor Vaupell, a Danish 19th centuryDrinking Water Drinking Water naturalist and a pioneering developer of the QuaternaryEngineering and Science Engineering and Science Open Access Access Open Discussions geoscience 1 2 Discussions J. K. Nielsen and S. Helama Earth System Earth System 1 Statoil ASA, Development and Production Norway, Field Development, P.O. Box 273, 7501 Stjørdal, Science Norway Science 2Finnish Forest Research Institute, Northern Regional Unit, P.O. Box 16, 96301 Rovaniemi, Finland Open Access Open Correspondence to: J. K. Nielsen ([email protected]) Access Open Data Data Received: 29 June 2012 – Revised: 6 August 2012 – Accepted: 20 August 2012 – Published: 5 September 2012 Discussions Abstract. Christian Theodor Vaupell (1821–1862) was a Danish scholar with pioneering investigations partic- ularly on the late Quaternary development of bog forests, but also microscopy of plant anatomy andSocial vegetative Social reproduction. His studies contributed to the early scientific thinking of the Quaternary environmental changes. Open Access Open Geography Open Access Open Geography Before his academic efforts, he had already survived the war between Prussia and Denmark albeit he became severely wounded and his left arm was amputated. The drama of his academic efforts, on the other hand, lies in the more or less suspicious dispute of his first doctoral thesis and his dismissal from the academic world during the following years.
    [Show full text]
  • En Historie Om Foranderlighed EVOLUTIONSTEORIEN I DANMARK 1860-80
    En historie om foranderlighed EVOLUTIONSTEORIEN I DANMARK 1860-80 AF HEIDI FUNDER Naturen omkring os forandrer sig – det har den har altid gjort, og det vil den altid gøre.1 Det slog Charles Darwin (1809-1882) fast med udgi- velsen af The Origin of Species i 1859, hvori han viste, at naturen var gen- stand for evolution. Evolution er en dynamisk, kontinuerlig proces, der som noget nyt, beskrevet af Darwin, var forårsaget af naturlig udvælgel- se blandt de relativt bedst egnede organismer. Naturen er altså foran- derlig og dens slutpunkt er endnu ukendt.2 Det samme er som bekendt tilfældet med historien og vores forståel- se af den. Dette gælder ikke mindst historien om Darwins værk og dets indflydelse. Mange kender en halvkvædet vise om, at denne Darwin mente, at mennesket var en abe, og det var vist var noget værre noget. Det skabte røre blandt videnskabsmændene. Det skabte grobund for alles kamp mod alle. Og det skabte konflikt, især med den kristne kirke og dens præster. Hvordan kunne den kristne skabelsesberetning fore- nes med, at vi alle nedstammede fra enkelte encellede organismer? Og 1 Indledningsvis vil jeg gerne benytte lejligheden til at takke forskellige personer for deres uvurderlige hjælp og interesse under udarbejdelsen af denne artikel, samt mit be- slægtede speciale: Darwins evolutionsteori blandt danske naturvidenskabsmænd 1860-80 af Heidi Juul-Hansen, 2001: ph.d. stipendiat Jes Fabricius Møller, Københavns Universitet, Professor Niels Henrik Gregersen, Aarhus Universitet, Adjunkt Peter C. Kjærgaard, Aar- hus Universitet, Lektor Birgitte Holten og Michael Sterll, Københavns Universitet, for deres hjælp og interesse især i forbindelse med arbejdet P.V Lund, samt endelig de ansat- te ved Zoologisk Museums arkiv Anne Marie Tværmoes og Hanne Espersen.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd Thesis from the Shadows out of Time
    UNIVERSITY OF COPENH AGEN FACULTY OF SCIENCE PhD Thesis Kasper Lykke Hansen From the Shadows out of Time A comparison and assessment of the fossil collections of P.W. Lund and V. Lausen based on historical archives and bone analysis. Additionally, thoughts and guidelines about future avenues for their usage are proposed. Supervisors: Tom Gilbert & Morten Meldgaard This thesis was submitted to the PhD School of Science, University of Copenhagen, 31 January 2019 Name of department: The Natural History Museum of Denmark Author(s): Kasper Lykke Hansen Title and subtitle: From the Shadows out of Time Topic description: A comparison and assessment of the fossil collections of P.W. Lund and V. Lausen based on historical archives and bone analysis. Additionally, thoughts and guidelines about future avenues for their usage are proposed. Supervisors: Tom Gilbert & Morten Meldgaard Submitted on: 31 January 2019 Word count: 32,400 Cover: V. Lausen and P.W. Lund (Photo: KLH, SNM) 1 Abstract English Two large South American subfossil vertebrate collections are housed in the Natural History Museum of Denmark, the P.W. Lund Collection and the V. Lausen Collection. Both were collected in the 19th century. Today they are kept in a storage facility and are very rarely accessed or studied. Many other European natural history museums keep similar collections. By examining the personal histories behind the collectors as well as reviewing and comparing the two collections, suggestions for their future use are proposed. Data has been collected from museum archives, letters, interviews and newspapers. Fossil material has been identified through morphological analysis. Both collections show a potential for deeper scientific investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • Darwinism Comes to Denmark the Early Danish Reception of Charles Darwin's Origin of Species
    Peter C. Kjaergaard and Niels Henrik Gregersen Darwinism comes to Denmark The Early Danish Reception of Charles Darwin's Origin of Species anes were not waiting for Darwin. Naturalists, liberals, intellectuals, atheist, radicals and social reformers were £ S all doing well without him - even after the publication of the Origin of Species. Eventually, however, Darwinism was incorporated in the various scientific, intellectual, cultural and political contexts, adjusted to fill the needs of their protagonists. But it did not happen overnight. Recent studies in the history of science suggest that a grand narrative of the reception of Darwinism cannot be maintained. People behaved differently in different contexts for different reasons. The Danish case is no exception. The first copy of Charles Darwin's the Origin of Species arrived in Denmark on January 1st 1860 in professor of zoology Japetus Steenstrup's study. Darwin had borrowed the collection of barnacles from the Zoology Museum in Copen­ hagen with the help of Steenstrup. As a compliment Darwin sent him a signed copy of the Origin. Steenstrup acknowledged Darwin as an important fellow naturalist, but like many of his colleagues at the University of Copenhagen he never accepted evolutionary theory. The initial scientific reaction to Darwin's work on evolution by means of natural selection was respectful, but made few converts. In the early 1870s the literary critic Georg Brandes started promoting Darwin's ideas as part of his liberal ideology and soon Darwinism became the mark of a new generation of intellectuals. Both the Steenstrup circle and the Brandes circle held Darwin in high esteem, but made completely different attributions to his theory.
    [Show full text]
  • GC Oeder's Conflict with Linnaeus and The
    G.C. Oeder's conflict with Linnaeus and the implementation of taxonomic and nomenclatural ideas in the monumantal Flora Danica project Friis, Ib Published in: Gardens' Bulletin, Singapore Publication date: 2019 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Friis, I. (2019). G.C. Oeder's conflict with Linnaeus and the implementation of taxonomic and nomenclatural ideas in the monumantal Flora Danica project. Gardens' Bulletin, Singapore, 71((Supplement 2), 53-85. https://www.nparks.gov.sg/sbg/research/publications/gardens-bulletin-singapore/-/media/sbg/gardens- bulletin/gbs_71_s2_y2019/71_s2_07_y2019_v71s2_gbs_pg53.pdf Download date: 29. sep.. 2021 Gardens’ Bulletin Singapore 71(Suppl. 2):53-85. 2019 53 doi: 10.26492/gbs71(suppl. 2).2019-07 G.C. Oeder’s conflict with Linnaeus and the implementation of taxonomic and nomenclatural ideas in the monumental Flora Danica project (1761–1883) I. Friis Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK–2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. [email protected] ABSTRACT. Hitherto unpublished parts of the history of the Icones … Florae Danicae (1761–1883), one of the largest illustrated botanical works published, are analysed; it covered the entire flora of the double monarchy of Denmark–Norway, Schleswig and Holstein and the North Atlantic dependencies. A study of the little noticed taxonomic and nomenclatural principles behind the Icones is presented. G.C. Oeder, founder of the project, approved the ideas of Buffon and Haller and rejected Linnaean binary nomenclature because of its lack of stability of genera. In the Icones …, Oeder cited all names used for each plant in chronological order, with the binary Linnaean name last, to which principle Linnaeus reacted.
    [Show full text]