The Security Situation for Central Asia: Afghanistan, Water, and Uzbek Stability

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Security Situation for Central Asia: Afghanistan, Water, and Uzbek Stability University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 2-1-2011 The Security Situation for Central Asia: Afghanistan, Water, and Uzbek Stability Carleton Wesley Becks University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the Asian Studies Commons, and the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Becks, Carleton Wesley, "The Security Situation for Central Asia: Afghanistan, Water, and Uzbek Stability" (2011). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 61. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/61 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. THE SECURITY SITUATION FOR CENTRAL ASIA: AFGHANISTAN, WATER, AND UZBEK STABILITY ___________ A Thesis Presented to The Dean and Faculty of the Josef Korbel School of International Studies University of Denver ____________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in International Security ___________________ by Carleton Wesley Becks February 2011 Advisor: Jonathan Adelman Author: Carleton Wesley Becks Title: THE SECURITY SITUATION FOR CENTRAL ASIA: AFGHANISTAN, WATER, AND UZBEK STABILITY Advisor: Jonathan Adelman Degree Date: February 2011 ABSTRACT Central Asia has emerged on the global stage after spending decades in isolation. As developing nations, most of Central Asia possesses the resources to spur rapid development. Things would seem to be in the region’s favor. There are, however, a few events that could derail the region. Afghanistan is on the periphery of the region and presents a series of difficult dilemmas such as creating a functioning government from a country that has been at war for nearly 30 years, the problem of the insurgency in the south, and narcotics trafficking. Water is scarce in the region, the leaders cannot agree on a water sharing treaty, and the downstream and upstream nations have different water usage needs and patterns. Lastly, Uzbekistan presents some challenges due to its centrality in the region, clan infighting, the unresolved issue of succession, and the tenuous stability in the country. ii Table of Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 2. Afghanistan ...................................................................................................... 7 a. Afghan History 1978-2001 ................................................................... 8 b. Pakistani Puzzle ................................................................................. 16 c. The Effect of Narcotics Trafficking .................................................. 22 d. Afghan Scenario ................................................................................. 26 e. Afghan Recommendations ................................................................ 32 3. Implications of Water ................................................................................... 36 a. Soviet Era Water Policy .................................................................... 38 b. Post-Independence Water Policy ...................................................... 40 c. The politics of water in Central Asia ................................................ 42 d. Central Asian water scenario ............................................................ 47 e. Water recommendations ................................................................... 53 4. Uzbekistan’s effect on stability ..................................................................... 56 a. The Uzbek President’s role ............................................................... 57 b. The role of clans ................................................................................. 58 c. The clans vs. Karimov ....................................................................... 60 d. The issue of succession ....................................................................... 62 e. Uzbek succession scenario …………………………………………. 64 f. Uzbek recommendations ...................................................................67 5. Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 68 Bibliography ......................................................................................................... 76 Endnotes ................................................................................................................ 78 iii Table of Figures Figure 1. Map of Afghanistan .............................................................................. 6 Figure 2. Map of South Asia ............................................................................... 15 Figure 3. Map of Amu Darya and Syr Darya Rivers ........................................ 35 Figure 4. Map of Uzbekistan ............................................................................... 55 iv Acknowledgment The author wishes to thank several people. I would like to thank my parents, for their love and support during the time it has taken to me to graduate. I would like to thank Chanelle J. Howe, PhD; for her patience and encouragement throughout this time. I would also like to thank Susan Rivera. She was very helpful in answering my seemingly unceasing procedural questions. Last but not least, I would like to thank Professor Jonathan Adelman for his help and being a sounding board for my myriad of questions. v Introduction “Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland; who rules the Heartland commands the World-Island; who rules the world-island controls the world.” 1 This theory has unknowingly been put into practice for centuries, and in no area is this truer than Central Asia. This region has passed through countless hands since the Mongols’ arrival in the 13 th and 14 th centuries. It is only now coming into its own as a distinct region since the end of the Cold War, and specifically in the context of post-September 11. The emergence of powerful neighbors bordering the region has only intensified Central Asia’s importance. Central Asia 2 has taken on an increased global profile lately, due primarily to the abundant natural resources in the region and the subsequent scramble by a myriad of nations for them. In what has been termed the New Great Game, countries including China, India, and the United States are trying to curry favor within the region to gain access to those resources. There is another explanation why the Central Asian republics figure so prominently on the global stage, their proximity to Afghanistan. The entire region’s security is not as substantially affected by Afghanistan; the burden is shouldered Page 1 primarily by Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. Turmoil in either country could have a spillover effect, causing significant internal instability for the rest of Central Asia. Unrest in Uzbekistan makes the rest of the region vulnerable due to its centrality, while Tajikistan’s porous borders allow easy transit and access to other countries. My thesis will have three parts in examining a question: the effect that Afghanistan, water scarcity and the conflict that could ensue, and Uzbekistan’s stability will have on the region. The short term effect of Afghanistan on the greater region will be relatively easy to recognize but the longer term effects will be more difficult to analyze. On the other hand, viable water is a necessity so the long term effects are very visible; however, the short term effects are not as easily quantifiable. Lastly, Uzbekistan’s ability to change the security dynamic within the region is a very abstract notion at the present. It is largely hypothetical but one that needs to be examined. Recommendations will be given for each area of concern and various scenarios will be constructed. The instability in Afghanistan is well known. The US and the international community are working to establish a functioning government, which has its own set of complications. There are times when the goals of the international community, NATO, and the US seem markedly different. There are disputes between the Pashtuns and other ethnic groups and within the larger Pashtun groupings themselves. There is also the Page 2 problem that Afghanistan has been in conflict for the better part of three decades. It does not have the necessary human capital to construct a functioning government. The country is starting over, for all intents and purposes. That is only the beginning. There are various non-state military formations (NMF) 3 operating freely within Afghanistan, which indicates a limit on central authority. The Afghan government is not strong enough to enjoy unfettered control of its sovereign territory. There are historical examples that show this may be a hallmark of Afghan governance. The central government historically had an alliance of sorts with the rural elite. Then there is the issue of narcotics trafficking taking place within Afghanistan, valued at $2.8 billion dollars per year 4. That is one of two economically viable industries left in the country; with the other being “a global arms market 5”. Related to the trafficking, are the problems related to poverty, like illiteracy and high levels of unemployment. To put narcotics’ value into perspective, the 2009 GDP of Afghanistan
Recommended publications
  • Leadership Transition in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan Implications for Policy and Stability in Central Asia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2007-09 Leadership transition in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan implications for policy and stability in Central Asia Smith, Shane A. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/3204 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS LEADERSHIP TRANSITION IN KAZAKHSTAN AND UZBEKISTAN: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND STABILITY IN CENTRAL ASIA by Shane A. Smith September 2007 Thesis Advisor: Thomas H. Johnson Second Reader: James A. Russell Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED September 2007 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Leadership Transition in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan: 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Implications for Policy and Stability in Central Asia 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Rights in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan
    University of Central Florida STARS Honors Undergraduate Theses UCF Theses and Dissertations 2016 A Comparative Study: Women's Rights in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan Megan A. Ginn University of Central Florida Part of the Comparative Politics Commons, Domestic and Intimate Partner Violence Commons, International Relations Commons, and the Politics and Social Change Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the UCF Theses and Dissertations at STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Undergraduate Theses by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Ginn, Megan A., "A Comparative Study: Women's Rights in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan" (2016). Honors Undergraduate Theses. 67. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses/67 A COMPARATIVE STUDY: WOMEN’S RIGHTS IN KAZAKHSTAN, UZBEKISTAN, AND TAJIKISTAN by MEGAN A. GINN A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors in the Major Program in Political Science in the College of Sciences and in the Burnett Honors College at the University of Central Florida Orlando, FL Spring Term, 2016 Thesis Chair: Dr. Houman Sadri Abstract After 1991 five countries emerged out of the fall of the Soviet Union to create a new region: Central Asia. No longer dominated by Soviet rule these countries fought to overcome barriers to independence and struggled to be seen by the international community as developed countries. However, these countries were far from developed and had to pay the high cost of human rights to get what they desired.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia
    U.S. ONLINE TRAINING FOR OSCE, INCLUDING REACT Module 6. Central Asia This module introduces you to central Asia and the OSCE’s work in: • Kazakhstan • Turkmenistan • Uzbekistan • Kyrgyzstan • Tajikistan 1 Table of Contents Overview. 3 Central Asia. 4 States before the Soviet period. 7 International organizations. 9 Caspian Oil. 10 Getting the oil out. 12 Over-fishing and pollution. 14 Water. 15 Kazakhstan. 18 Geography. 19 People. 20 Government. 21 Before Russian rule. 22 Under Russian and Soviet rule. 23 From Perestroika to independence. 25 Domestic politics. 26 Ethnic relations. 31 Internal security. 32 Foreign relations. 33 Kazakhstan culture. 40 Turkmenistan. 42 Geography. 43 People. 44 Government. 45 Basic geography. 46 Historical background. 47 Domestic politics. 48 Ethnic relations. 53 Foreign relations. 54 Turkmenistan culture. 58 Uzbekistan. 63 Geography. 64 People. 65 Government. 66 Basic geography. 67 Historical background. 68 The Muslim civilization of Bukhara and Samarkand. 69 The Turko-Persian civilization. 70 Under Russian and Soviet rule. 71 Perestroika and independence. 72 Domestic politics. 73 Economics and politics. 77 Islam and politics. 78 MODULE 6. Central Asia 2 Ethnic relations. 80 Foreign relations. 81 Uzbekistan culture. 85 Kyrgyzstan. 89 Geography. 90 People. 91 Government. 92 Basic geography. 93 Historical background. 94 The Osh conflict and the ‘Silk Revolution’. 95 Ethnic relations. 96 Domestic politics. 97 Foreign relations. 106 Culture. 111 Tajikistan. 116 Geography. 117 People. 118 Government. 119 Four regions of Tajikistan. 120 Historical background. 121 The civil war. 122 Nature of the war. 124 Negotiations and the peace process. 125 Politics, economics and foreign affairs. 130 Domestic politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Uzbekistan's Media Be Relied Upon To
    UMIDA NIYAZOVA LYNN SCHWEISFURTH Can Uzbekistan’s Media be Relied Upon to Scrutinize the Safe Return of Gulnara Karimova’s Assets? Can Uzbekistan’s Media be Relied Upon to Scrutinize the Safe Return of Gulnara Karimova’s Assets? Umida Niyazova and Lynn Schweisfurth1 The return of Gulnara Karimova’s misappropriated assets to Uzbekistan presents an opportunity to restore faith in the rule of law and confirm societal victims’ right to compensation which benefits the communities they were stolen from. However, persisting constraints on Uzbek civil society and a self- censoring media, tightly overseen by the authorities, pose a serious risk to adequate scrutiny of how the assets will be managed and disbursed. Introduction The return of Gulnara Karimova’s stolen assets to Uzbekistan, their management and disbursement, is dependent on two key issues: transparency and accountability. The government of Uzbekistan is set to receive over $1 billion USD which the former President’s daughter had received in bribe payments. Who will manage and disburse these funds? What will the funds be spent on? And who will decide how to spend them? The role of independent media in following this process will be crucial in ensuring that these assets ultimately benefit Uzbek citizens and do not fall victim to repeated misappropriation or mismanagement. The freedom of the media in Uzbekistan, however, comes with a number of caveats which seriously call into question their ability to monitor the process and hold the government accountable. 1 Umida Niyazova is the founder and director of Uzbek Forum for Human Rights. Lynn Schweisfurth is a consultant at Uzbek Forum for Human Rights: https://www.uzbekforum.org/ Shavkat Mirziyoyev’s program of reforms has certainly improved Uzbekistan’s media landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Tyranny Has a Witness Human Rights Watch Annual Report 2012 Human Rights Watch 2012 Annualreport
    TYRANNY HAS A WITNESS HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH ANNUAL REPORT 2012 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL 2012 WATCH RIGHTS HUMAN JUSTICE HRW.org HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH ANNUAL REPORT | 2012 Inclusive of the organization’s work and reflective of its supporters from July 1, 2011 to December 31, 2012. This year’s annual report is dedicated to Cynthia Brown: colleague, friend and mentor at Human Rights Watch for more than 30 years, who passed away in 2013. At Human Rights Watch, Cynthia was our first program director, our Chile-based researcher, a talented writer and editor, a visionary in creating the Women’s Rights Division, and above all else, a passionate advocate for human rights. For Cynthia, human rights violations were not abstract; she never lost sight of the actual human beings who were suffering. We are grateful to her for pioneering rights reporting, advocacy and justice strategies we use every single day. Michael J. Burlingame, Project Director Zoe Maddox, Copy Writer/Editor Ivan Cheung, Copy Coordinator Women, widowed by the 2006-2008 clashes between insurgent Ivy Shen, Creative Coordinator forces and the Kenyan government, bond in the aftermath of Damiano Design Inc., Graphic Design their husbands’ forced disappearances and deaths. Human Rights Watch successfully pressed the United States Senate to condition US military assistance to Kenya upon investigations into alleged Kenyan military crimes. © 2011 Brent Stirton/Reportage by Getty Images for Human Rights Watch 350 FIFTH AVENUE, 34TH FLOOR New YOrk, NY 10118-3299 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WELCOME | LETTER 01 DEAR FRIENDS, 2012 was a watershed year for victims seeking justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Uzbekistan: President's Daughter Takes Another Step Toward 'Throne' by Gulnoza Saidazimova
    Uzbekistan: President's Daughter Takes Another Step Toward 'Throne' By Gulnoza Saidazimova Gulnara Karimova, future president of Uzbekistan? (ITAR-TASS) Gulnara Karimova has long been seen as a leading candidate to succeed her father, Uzbek President Islam Karimov. So it comes as little surprise that her appointment on February 1 to head a new department for cultural affairs within the Foreign Ministry is widely regarded as a bid to ensure that she eventually assumes the Uzbek "throne." "The rumors that Gulnara Karimov will become a regional governor or a Tashkent city mayor have been around for a long time. The reason was that if Islam Karimov saw his daughter as his heiress, Gulnara was supposed to gain managerial experience," says Toshpulat Yuldoshev, an independent analyst in Tashkent. "I think Gulnara Karimova's appointment as a deputy foreign minister means that Karimov is preparing her to become president one day, although I think Karimov, if he lives long enough, would not like to give up power to anybody," he adds. Karimova, 35, is a Harvard graduate who holds a doctorate in political science from Tashkent University, and also black belt in karate. Karimova has already had several positions within the government -- including as an adviser to the foreign minister and a special envoy at the Uzbek Embassy in Moscow. Business Interests But Karimova, one of the wealthiest people in Uzbekistan, is known mostly for her business activities. She reportedly controls the country's oil and gas industries, as well as its telecom and construction sectors. Her business empire is believed to extend to Moscow, Dubai, and Geneva.
    [Show full text]
  • Uzbekistan 2017 Human Rights Report
    UZBEKISTAN 2017 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Uzbekistan is a constitutional republic with a political system dominated by President Shavkat Mirziyoyev and his supporters. On December 4, 2016, former prime minister Shavkat Mirziyoyev won the presidential elections with 88 percent of the vote. The Organization for Security and Cooperation’s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (OSCE/ODHIR), in its final election observation report, noted, “the campaign lacked competitiveness and voters were not presented with a genuine choice of political alternatives,” with OSCE/ODIHR observers “citing serious irregularities inconsistent with national legislation and OSCE commitments, including proxy voting and indications of ballot box stuffing.” At the same time, the report also identified positive changes, such as the election’s increased transparency, service to voters with disabilities, and unfettered access for more than 500 international observers. Parliamentary elections took place in December 2014. According to the OSCE’s observer mission, those elections did not meet international commitments or standards. Civilian authorities generally maintained effective control over the security forces, but security services permeated civilian structures, and their interaction was opaque, making it difficult to define the scope and limits of civilian authority. The most significant human rights issues included torture and abuse of detainees by security forces, arbitrary arrest, and incommunicado and prolonged detention. Prison conditions
    [Show full text]
  • Nations in Transit 2015 Executive Summary
    Uzbekistan by Sarah Kendzior Capital: Tashkent Population: 30.7 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$5,840 Source: The data above are drawn from the World Bank’s World Development Indicators 2015. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Electoral Process 6.75 6.75 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Civil Society 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Independent Media 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 National Democratic Governance 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Local Democratic Governance 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 Judicial Framework and Independence 6.75 6.75 6.75 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Corruption 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 Democracy Score 6.82 6.82 6.86 6.89 6.93 6.93 6.93 6.93 6.93 6.93 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
    [Show full text]
  • Uzbekistan by Sarah Kendzior
    Uzbekistan by Sarah Kendzior Capital: Tashkent Population: 29.3 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$3,420 Source: The data above are drawn from the World Bank’s World Development Indicators 2013. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Electoral Process 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Civil Society 6.50 6.50 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Independent Media 6.75 6.75 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Governance* 6.25 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a National Democratic Governance n/a 6.50 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Local Democratic Governance n/a 6.25 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 Judicial Framework and Independence 6.50 6.25 6.75 6.75 6.75 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Corruption 6.00 6.00 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 Democracy Score 6.46 6.43 6.82 6.82 6.86 6.89 6.93 6.93 6.93 6.93 * Starting with the 2005 edition, Freedom House introduced separate analysis and ratings for national democratic governance and local democratic governance to provide readers with more detailed and nuanced analysis of these two important subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Uzbekistan by Sarah Kendzior
    Uzbekistan by Sarah Kendzior Capital: Tashkent Population: 29.8 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$5,340 Source: The data above are drawn from the World Bank’s World Development Indicators 2014. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Electoral Process 6.75 6.75 6.75 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Civil Society 6.50 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Independent Media 6.75 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 National Democratic Governance 6.50 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Local Democratic Governance 6.25 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 Judicial Framework and Independence 6.25 6.75 6.75 6.75 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Corruption 6.00 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 Democracy Score 6.43 6.82 6.82 6.86 6.89 6.93 6.93 6.93 6.93 6.93 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Group Systematic Country Diagnostic for Uzbekistan
    Human Rights Watch Submission: World Bank Group Systematic Country Diagnostic for Uzbekistan August 2015 Human Rights Watch welcomes the opportunity to participate in the consultation process on the (WBG) Systematic Country Diagnostic (SCD) for Uzbekistan. Human Rights Watch urges the WBG to include in the SCD a frank analysis of appalling human rights record, which presents a serious obstacle to achieving the of ending extreme poverty and promoting inclusive development in Uzbekistan. While the challenges the country faces to achieve sustainable development, it gives insufficient attention to human rights concerns that pose serious development risks. The SCD should correct this omission and develop strategies that take into account specific human rights concerns that would likely affect ed prosperity. Human Rights Watch strongly encourages the WBG to address the following issues, including by highlighting them as challenges to sustainable development in the SCD, incorporating them into its policy dialogues with the government, and taking necessary measures to ensure they are addressed in proposed and ongoing WBG projects: The need to ensure community participation in identifying and shaping development priorities, including by addressing ongoing restrictions affecting civil society and the media and taking all necessary steps to ensure that people affected by WBG projects have the opportunity to participate in the development of such projects without reprisal. velopment goals, including torture in detention, lack of accountability for past human rights abuses, forced sterilization of women and entrenched discrimination, including on the basis of religion, sexual orientation or gender identity. The need to elimin widespread use of forced labor, including children, in the cotton sector.1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Telesystems PJSC Reaches $850 Million Resolutions with DOJ and SEC Over FCPA Violations
    March 12, 2019 Mobile TeleSystems PJSC Reaches $850 Million Resolutions with DOJ and SEC Over FCPA Violations In the latest dramatic chapter of the long-running bribery saga that has pervaded the telecommunications sector in Uzbekistan, on March 6 and 7, 2019, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced settlements with Mobile TeleSystems PJSC (“MTS”), Russia’s largest telecommunications provider, involving violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”). The resolutions, which include penalties, forfeiture, and disgorgement totaling $850 million, relate to a similar scheme to bribe Uzbek officials to obtain and retain business in Uzbekistan that led to the $795– million resolutions in 2016 with VimpelCom Limited, a Netherlands-based telecommunications company, and the $965–million resolutions in 2017 with Telia Company AB, a telecommunications company based in Sweden.1 The DOJ also unsealed charges of conspiracy to commit money laundering against Gulnara Karimova, the eldest daughter of Islam Karimov, the deceased former president of Uzbekistan, and FCPA and money laundering conspiracy charges against Bekhzod Akhmedov, the former general director of Uzdunrobita LLC (“Uzdunrobita”), a telecommunications operator in Uzbekistan and an MTS subsidiary.2 Karimova and Akhmedov featured prominently, but were not mentioned by name, in the prior resolutions involving VimpelCom and Telia.3 According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, combined the amounts paid to Karimova amount to the “largest bribe payment ever received by [an] individual defendant” in an FCPA case.4 Specifically, the DOJ filed a two-count criminal information in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York charging MTS, a foreign “issuer” within the meaning of the FCPA, with conspiracy to violate the FCPA and violations of the books and records and internal controls provisions of 1 See Paul, Weiss Client Memorandum, “VimpelCom Agrees to Landmark $795 Million FCPA Resolution” (Feb.
    [Show full text]