DOCSLIB.ORG

Histories of Hating

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Histories of Hating Edinburgh Research Explorer Histories of Hating Citation for published version: Shepherd, T, Harvey, A, Jordan, T, Srauy, S & Miltner, K 2015, 'Histories of Hating', Social Media and Society, vol. 1, no. 2, 2056305115603997, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603997 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1177/2056305115603997 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Social Media and Society General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 27. Sep. 2021 SMSXXX10.1177/2056305115603997Social Media + SocietyShepherd et al. 603997research-article2015 SI: Culture Digitally Social Media + Society July-December 2015: 1 –10 Histories of Hating © The Author(s) 2015 DOI: 10.1177/2056305115603997 sms.sagepub.com Tamara Shepherd1, Alison Harvey2, Tim Jordan3, Sam Srauy4 and Kate Miltner5 Abstract This roundtable discussion presents a dialogue between digital culture scholars on the seemingly increased presence of hating and hate speech online. Revolving primarily around the recent #GamerGate campaign of intensely misogynistic discourse aimed at women in video games, the discussion suggests that the current moment for hate online needs to be situated historically. From the perspective of intersecting cultural histories of hate speech, discrimination, and networked communication, we interrogate the ontological specificity of online hating before going on to explore potential responses to the harmful consequences of hateful speech. Finally, a research agenda for furthering the historical understandings of contemporary online hating is suggested in order to address the urgent need for scholarly interventions into the exclusionary cultures of networked media. Keywords digital culture, hate speech, regulation, affordances, trolling, #GamerGate Introduction: A Moment for Hate Given the context of vitriolic online misogyny so starkly 2010). Here, special emphasis is placed on the ontological illustrated in the ongoing #GamerGate campaign, it seems status of social media as the primary mode through which that iterations of hate speech have become endemic to much hate is currently expressed. For example, viewing online online discourse. Earlier, more optimistic pronouncements hate as a kind of performance invites analysis of how such of the Internet’s ability to offer spaces for productive and performative acts interface with the temporal and spatial democratic interactivity seem at best naive in what can be affordances of social media. Part of this entails historical framed as the current ascendancy of online hate. This is interrogation of the “social” in social media, where the com- reflected in the string of prosecutions since 2012 for online munity norms of different sites interact with more top-down hate speech in the United Kingdom that reflect distinct legis- modes of governance—as in laws that are being formulated lative frameworks being developed for online as opposed to differently in specific national jurisdictions and in individual offline speech (Rustin, 2014). While we may be experienc- website terms and conditions. Governance of hate thus hap- ing something of a “moment” for hate speech online, taking pens in the intersections between policy and community, and a more historical perspective to networked communication these intersections themselves develop over time and accord- shows that this kind of online hate, including a wide range of ing to specific spatial arrangements. The processes underly- behaviors from flaming to trolling to cyberbullying, may ing online hate point toward a set of complex issues at the also be characteristic and perhaps constitutive of online cul- ture (Jane, 2014b). In looking for precedents of online hate speech in earlier 1University of Calgary, Canada 2 Internet spaces as well as mediated communication more University of Leicester, UK 3University of Sussex, UK generally, we point toward longstanding issues of exclusion 4Oakland University, USA and inequality in public speech. To trace the shifting borders 5USC Annenberg School of Communication and Journalism, USA of inclusion and exclusion that subtend the ebbs and flows of Corresponding Author: particular moments for hate discourses in specific political Tamara Shepherd, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW Calgary, contexts offers an inroad into thinking historically about the AB, Canada, T2N 1N4. affordances of various online spaces as platforms (Gillespie, Email: [email protected] Creative Commons CC-BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). 2 Social Media + Society center of any normative discussion of regulation and inter- In 1978, the proponent of the now well-known “finger” vention, including the boundaries of free speech, asymme- command (that would allow users to identify who else was on tries between more powerful and more marginalized actors, a particular computer system) was vigorously attacked by the meanings and implications of visibility, and the dynamics other online users for proposing something that they felt between online and offline hate. transgressed the open nature of the Internet. Also in 1978, off This roundtable-style discussion article examines such of what we now know as the Internet but still via networked topics through a series of prompting questions, answers to CMC through bulletin board systems, someone published a which are organized dialogically to put ideas into conversa- “guide to flaming on BBS.” Similarly off-Internet but through tion with each other and build up a collaborative analytical computer networks, the trolling group the “Meowers,” who approach to a complex problem. Growing from previous frequented Usenet, helped invent the practice of “crap-flood- face-to-face discussions at Culture Digitally’s London meet- ing” (posting so much irrelevant material to a forum that users ing in June 2013, the article allows for an extended consider- are unable to use the forum for its stated topic). By the 2000s, ation of online hate as historical process, with a view toward diverse inflammatory groups began to emerge according with setting up a conceptual framework for future research. To the Internet’s spread as a mass medium, from sites like that end, throughout the discussion, we engage with episte- SomethingAwful to groups with campaigns like the Gay mological questions of where to position ourselves as Niggers Association of America (which included some mem- researchers in contentious spaces: how we should define bers who became famous for being trolls, such as Weev). online hate; how we should document a sprawling and From here, a progression can be constructed that leads into to uneven set of histories, contextually differing practices, the rise of sites like 4chan and the infamous/b/random board, speech acts, and norms; how to develop methodologies and and then to some of the trolling and “lulz” roots of Anonymous, theoretical orientations that connect micro, meso, and macro and finally to the present day, in which hate online appears in levels of analysis; how to articulate normative and interven- episodes of misogyny like #GamerGate or the trolling of tionist concerns; and what is the best way to work with com- memorial sites in the United Kingdom that has led to arrests munities and within spaces where hate speech pervades. and the jailing of trolls. The point of suggesting that hate, trolling, and flaming Histories and Ontologies of Hate online have been present as long as we have had CMC is not to diminish it or dismiss attention to it. It is rather to ask, how Online should we best approach hate online and what is specific to The conversation began by establishing a foundation on online hating? I offer two brief suggestions for starting to which to theorize online hate, articulating the historical prec- answer such questions in relation to evidence and online edents for the communicative practices characterizing communication. #GamerGate, and contextualizing hate and harassment It is important to develop detailed examinations of how within the earliest computer-mediated communication (CMC) hate works online to grasp it, or we miss such things as the controversies. meaning of “lulz” in online political activism. An exemplar here is Whitney Phillips’ work, which focuses on trolls who Tim Jordan target online memorial sites—on the face of it, conducting some of the most offensive online insults imaginable in target- Is hate more prevalent in Internet- and computer-mediated ing those mourning a
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Online Harassment: a Legislative Solution
    \\jciprod01\productn\H\HLL\54-2\HLL205.txt unknown Seq: 1 11-MAY-17 15:55 ONLINE HARASSMENT: A LEGISLATIVE SOLUTION EMMA MARSHAK* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .......................................... 501 II. WHY IS ONLINE HARASSMENT A PROBLEM?................ 504 R a. The Scope of the Problem ............................ 504 R b. Economic Impact .................................... 507 R i. Lost Business Opportunities ...................... 507 R ii. Swatting ........................................ 510 R iii. Doxxing ........................................ 511 R III. CURRENT LAW .......................................... 512 R a. Divergent State Law ................................. 512 R b. Elements of the Law ................................. 514 R IV. LAW ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATIVE PROBLEMS ........ 515 R a. Police Training ...................................... 515 R b. Investigative Resources .............................. 519 R c. Prosecutorial Jurisdiction ............................ 520 R V. SOLUTION ............................................... 521 R a. Proposed Legislation ................................ 521 R b. National Evidence Laboratory ........................ 526 R c. Training Materials ................................... 526 R VI. CONCLUSION ............................................ 528 R VII. APPENDIX ............................................... 530 R I. INTRODUCTION A journalist publishes an article; rape threats follow in the comments.1 An art curator has a conversation with a visitor to her gallery;
    [Show full text]
  • NARAL Ep5 V04 20200623.Mp3
    NARAL_Ep5_v04_20200623.mp3 Jess McIntosh [00:00:00] This limited series podcast is based on the book, "The Lie that Binds" by NARAL Pro-Choice America president Ilyse Hogue with Ellie Langford. Each episode builds on the history terminology and figureheads established in the last. So we strongly recommend that you start from episode one before jumping ahead. Brianna Wu [00:00:18] The truth is, GamerGate is less of an event and more of a playbook to use against someone you don't like. Jess McIntosh [00:00:26] This is Brianna Wu, co-founder of independent videogame studio Giant SpaceKat. Brianna Wu [00:00:32] This is the GamerGate playbook. Find someone you want to shut up. Go to their entire life. Go through all their social media posts. Investigate them and find something to attack them with. And then get an army of people online to scream from the hills about this fact which may or may not be true and destroyed their reputation. The idea is to make the cost of speaking out so high that it's easier to just remain silent. Jess McIntosh [00:00:59] The GamerGate controversy started in August 2014. Brianna Wu [00:01:01] All through 2014 my women colleagues were being basically bullied out of the industry. Jess McIntosh [00:01:09] It was set off after game developer Zoe Quinn was falsely accused by their ex-boyfriend of sleeping with a videogame journalist to garner positive reviews for their company's new game. This led to an avalanche of rape threats, doxing and death threats against Quinn, as well as women who criticized sexism in the game industry in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Progressive Massachusetts 2020 Congressional Endorsement Questionnaire
    PROGRESSIVE MASSACHUSETTS 2020 CONGRESSIONAL ENDORSEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE Candidate: Brianna Wu Office Sought: US House Representative, MA-08 Party: Democratic Website: www.briannawuforcongress.com Twitter: @BriannaWu Facebook: Facebook.com/developerbriannawu/ Email questions to [email protected]. CONFIDENTIAL SECTION 2 I. About You 1. Why are you running for office? And what will your top 3 priority pieces of legislation if elected? BW: After the election of Donald Trump, I realized I could not simply hope for a future course correction. I had to step up and do all I could to make sure it happened. Trump's election was a turning point in our society. Racism, discrimination, and the suppression of human rights seemed to become legitimized. Then, I started to look to my own congressman for leadership. I found that my congressman and my opponent, Rep. Stephen Lynch, first ran for the Massachusetts state legislature because he wanted to keep the LGBTQ community out of the Boston St. Patrick's Day parade. He promoted a ""gay panic"" legal defense for hate crimes. He voted for the Iraq War and against Obamacare. And, to say he has flip-flopped on choice would be generous. To me, his record is unacceptable and out-of-touch with Democratic values. I am running for this office because the status-quo is simply not working. We are running out of time to address the existential threats to our country and our world. We need universal healthcare, a Green New Deal, tuition-free public college, comprehensive immigration reform, universal gun safety, money out of politics, and a guarantee of LGBTQ and women's rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociotechnical Security As an Analytic Framework
    Entanglements and Exploits: Sociotechnical Security as an Analytic Framework Data & Society Research Institute Columbia University Matt Goerzen, ​ ​Elizabeth Anne Watkins, ​ Open Technology Fund Research Fellow Gabrielle Lim, ​ Abstract Unfortunately, platform-linked violence like the incidents in The rise of social media platforms has produced novel Christchurch and San Diego are not uncommon and are security threats and vulnerabilities. Malicious actors can unlikely to subside in the near future. Other forms of now exploit entanglements of once disparate technical and problematic and potentially dangerous content also social systems to target exposed communities. These proliferate. False and misleading content distributed on exploits pose a challenge to legacy security frameworks Whatsapp in India led to the murders of over two dozen drawn from technical and state-based conceptions of people in 2018 (Goel et al., 2018). The genocide of the referent objects and bounded information systems. In this Rohyinga in Myanmar was partially incited by the military paper we propose a new framework of analysis to meet this through disinformation and false accounts on Facebook challenge, Sociotechnical Security (STsec), which (Mozur, 2018). Facebook usage may also correlate with acknowledges how the interplay between actors produces higher rates of anti-refugee attacks in Germany (Müller and emergent threats to participant communities. This Schwarz 2018). Meanwhile, targeted harassment has been exploratory paper offers an overview of sociotechnical linked to self-censorship and a chilling effect on systems, explains why these threats and vulnerabilities internet-based communications (UN Office of the High require us to expand our understanding of security with Commissioner, 2017). Amnesty International in 2018, for regards to participatory technology, and how sociotechnical example, declared Twitter trolling of women a human rights security can be operationalized as a framework for analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Gamergate and Resistance to the Diversification of Gaming Culture
    64 COMMENTARY: GamerGate and resistance to the diversification of gaming culture CHERIE TODD It is reported that there are now over one billion people worldwide who play multimedia video games, and the typical ‘gamer’ stereotype (mid 20s, single, white male) no longer applies (Reilly, 2015). Games are growing increasingly more pervasive as well as more social, and are now available any time on multiple platforms (PC, Xbox and PlayStation) and devices such as smart phones and iPads. Within less than a decade, video games have gone from being a niche area of entertainment for a few, to a mass medium that appeals to people of all ages and genders. Research continues to show an increase in the number of women who are now gaming, with the genders almost reaching parity. These statistics, however, tend to focus on gaming as a whole, and ignore gender splits within particular games and/or countries, where in many online games women are often a minority. As a result of this gender imbalance, the culture of games continues to be heavily influenced by highly masculinist discourse. There is an increasing diversification of gaming culture that is occurring due to the growing popularity of games. While many perceive this to be a positive step, there are some who are resistant to these fundamental shifts and who do not want the culture of games to change. Users of the hashtag #GamerGate have been the most vocal in their resistance to these changes. In 2014 reports of GamerGate activities started to circulate more widely, becoming a topical issue in the USA where news outlets began to describe the emergence of a ‘culture war’ over the diversification of gaming culture.
    [Show full text]
  • It's About Ethics in Games Journalism? Gamergaters and Geek
    SMSXXX10.1177/2056305116672484Social Media + SocietyBraithwaite 672484research-article2016 SI: Making Digital Cultures Social Media + Society October-December 2016: 1 –10 It’s About Ethics in Games Journalism? © The Author(s) 2016 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav Gamergaters and Geek Masculinity DOI: 10.1177/2056305116672484 sms.sagepub.com Andrea Braithwaite Abstract #Gamergate is an online movement ostensibly dedicated to reforming ethics in video games journalism. In practice, it is characterized by viciously sexual and sexist attacks on women in and around gaming communities. #Gamergate is also a site for articulating “Gamergater” as a form of geek masculinity. #Gamergate discussions across social media platforms illustrate how Gamergaters produce and reproduce this gendered identity. Gamergaters perceive themselves as crusaders, under siege from critics they pejoratively refer to as SJWs (social justice warriors). By leveraging social media for concern-trolling about gaming as an innocuous masculine pastime, Gamergaters situate the heterosexual White male as both the typical gamer and the real victim of #Gamergate. #Gamergate is a specific and virulent online node in broader discussions of privilege, difference, and identity politics. Gamergaters are an instructive example of how social media operate as vectors for public discourses about gender, sexual identity, and equality, as well as safe spaces for aggressive and violent misogyny. Keywords Gamergate, gaming cultures, geek masculinity, online harassment, social media At the end of August 2014, many online gaming communities situate themselves as the “real” victims, oppressed by calls erupted into vicious arguments—ostensibly about ethics in for diversity and at risk of losing “their” games to more video game journalism, but more pointedly about gender, inclusive ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Robux Gift Card Free
    ROBUX GIFT CARD FREE how do you get free robux on roblox mobihack net roblox hack The site has been called "worthless" by users such as Brianna Wu, an independent games programmer and activist. She was also specifically referencing the site's lack of any kind of real economy.[10] There have been multiple instances where money and donations were sent to ROBLOX asking for some kind of update on a game which never came to life. She has asked for the company to be more transparent in regards to this situation and stated that she will not give them any more money until they actually deliver something. free roblox accounts with robux that work not banned There are lots of resources where you can find Roblox promo codes and there are also a lot of hacks to help you get free robux. You can find Roblox promo codes in different forums and cheat sites as well. If you do choose to try out the hacks, remember that those websites can be prone to attacks and they might expose your security details which could result in your account being deleted. free robux generator no human verification 2021 In my opinion, the best and most legitimate way to get free roblox robux is to make your own. This can be time-consuming, but you can do everything yourself and make sure that you are not running into any problems. It will take a lot of time to figure out the design and layout of the webpage, but once it is completed you should easily be able to get a lot of traffic from search engines like Google.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Eye, Winter 2017
    WINTER 2017 The Public Eye In this issue: Religious Freedom is a Progressive Value • Birth of the Alt Right • Mobilizing Misogyny • Right Moves: Interview with Jason Stahl editor’s letter BY FREDERICK CLARKSON After the November election, the growing concern among progressives about the “Alt THE PUBLIC EYE Right”—an ideology that draws together White supremacism, misogyny, antisemitism, QUARTERLY and authoritarianism in an irony- and meme-fueled movement—became a sense of emer- gency. Followers of the movement were Sieg Heiling in Washington D.C. hotels, and a spate PUBLISHER Tarso Luís Ramos of attacks against minority groups and people of color were reported across the country. It seemed as though the worst elements of President Trump’s base had emerged en masse to EDITOR mark their victory with virulent displays of intolerance. But as with confronting any threat, Kathryn Joyce effective response first requires understanding it. COVER ART Nansi Guevara In this issue, as well as in a rapidly-expanding list of online-exclusive reports, stories, and LAYOUT profiles, PRA is doing what it does best: digging into the fraught subject of the White na- Gabriel Joffe tionalist Alt Right with meticulous research and broad historical context. This edition of PRINTING The Public Eye includes two full-length features concerning the Alt Right. The first of these Red Sun Press is David Neiwert’s “Birth of the Alt Right” (pg. 4). Neiwert, who with journalist Sarah EDITORIAL BOARD Posner investigated the movement over the course of the presidential race, delves into the Frederick Clarkson • Alex DiBranco deep backstory of how the Alt Right came to be.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the First Workshop on Abusive Language Online
    ACL 2017 The First Workshop on Abusive Language Online Proceedings of the Workshop August 4, 2017 Vancouver, Canada Sponsors Primary Sponsor Malcolm S. Forbes Center for Culture and Media Studies Platinum Sponsors Gold Sponsors Silver Sponsors Bloomberg ii c 2017 The Association for Computational Linguistics Order copies of this and other ACL proceedings from: Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) 209 N. Eighth Street Stroudsburg, PA 18360 USA Tel: +1-570-476-8006 Fax: +1-570-476-0860 [email protected] ISBN 978-1-945626-66-1 iii Introduction We are very pleased to welcome you to the first Workshop on Abusive Language Online (ALW), held at ACL 2017 in Vancouver, Canada. The last few years have seen a surge in abusive behavior online, with governments, social media platforms, and individuals struggling to cope with the consequences and to produce effective methods to combat it. In many cases, online forums, comment sections, and social media interactions have become sites for bullying, scapegoating, and hate speech. These forms of online aggression not only poison the social climate of the online communities that experience it, but can also provoke physical violence and harm. Addressing abusive language necessitates a multidisciplinary approach that requires knowledge from several fields, including, but not limited to: media studies, natural language processing (NLP), psychology, sociology, law, gender studies, communications, and critical race theory. NLP, as a field that directly works with computationally analyzing language, is in a unique position to develop automated methods to analyse, detect, and filter abusive language. By working across disciplinary divides, researchers in all these fields can produce a comprehensive approach to abusive language that blends together computational, social and legal methods.
    [Show full text]
  • The New/ "Alt" Right, Toxic Masculinity, and Violence”
    1 “The New/ "Alt" Right, Toxic Masculinity, and Violence” Paper for presentation at the 2018 conference of the Canadian Political Science Association University of Regina, Saskatchewan **This is a draft. Please do not cite without author permission. John Grant Assistant Professor Department of Political Science King’s University College, Western University [email protected] Fiona MacDonald Associate Professor Department of Political Science University of the Fraser Valley [email protected] Introduction The politics of masculinity are now front and centre in mainstream society to a degree that is unprecedented. Donald Trump’s U.S. presidential campaign and election victory in 2016 were key events in positioning the topic of masculinity publicly in new and unprecedented ways. Much of the media coverage of Trump’s campaign and election victory highlights masculinity as a significant element in analyzing his political successes as well as potential sources of weakness. The Trump campaign has been credited with exposing a “cult of toxic masculinity” (The Telegraph, October 2016) as well as evidencing the need to rebuke and reject the “toxic masculinity” he represents through protest actions like the women’s marches (Cosmopolitan January 2017, The New York Times October 2017). Alongside Trump we are witnessing many other invocations of manhood. Some, such as the “Proud Boys”, reflect a similar kind of toxic masculinity symbolized by Trump—that is, a narrow and constraining understanding of masculinity primarily characterized by dominance, aggression, strength, sexual conquest and the rejection of any traits or behaviors associated with femininity. At the same time, we are witnessing men in politics challenge traditional notions of masculinity.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence Against Women Is Never a Game! Congress Must Ensure That Persons Making Online Threats of Assault, Sexual Violence and Death Are Held Accountable
    Violence against women is never a game! Congress must ensure that persons making online threats of assault, sexual violence and death are held accountable. WE NEED YOUR STORIES!!! #stalkingisnogame October 29, 2014 – please distribute widely! Trigger warning: rape, murder, violence; this alert contains disturbing and offensive language On October 15, feminist critic Anita Sarkeesian, nationally known for her efforts to call out violence against women in online gaming, was forced to cancel a speaking appearance at Utah State University when the school received an anonymous email threatening to carry out "the deadliest shooting in American history”[i] if the event was not cancelled. The email was only one of a long history of online threats and harassment directed at Sarkeesian. She, like other activists against online gender-based violence, has been forced to move out of her home. The FBI only recently took on her case; they, like many other law enforcement agencies, face many barriers to effectively investigating online threats of sexual and physical violence, and often, cyberviolence/online stalking is not a priority. Congress must act to ensure that our laws keep pace with growing online violence and to ensure law enforcement has access to the tools necessary to enforce those laws. We will ask Congress to hold a hearing on cyberviolence/online stalking – we need your stories! Background: Sarkeesian and two female video game developers, Zoe Quinn and Brianna Wu are at the center of “Gamergate”, a culture war within the video game community. A tiny subset of video game fans are attacking people who critique the misogynistic content of many video games; these trolls claim to be policing journalistic ethics by threatening Sarkeesian, Quinn and Wu with rape, torture and death.[ii] The following is just one of many threats aimed at Sarkeesian: “I’m going to kill your parents .
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing Cyber Harassment: an Overview of Hate Crimes in Cyberspace
    Journal of Law, Technology & the Internet · Vol. 6 · 2015 ADDRESSING CYBER HARASSMENT: AN OVERVIEW OF HATE CRIMES IN CYBERSPACE Danielle Keats Citron∗ INTRODUCTION It is an auspicious time to discuss cyber harassment and cyber stalking. When I began writing about cyber harassment in 2007, it was dismissed as a part of the bargain of online life. Although the abuse often involved threats, defamation, and privacy invasions, commentators regarded it as “no big deal.”1 Victims were told to stop “whining” because they chose to blog about controversial topics or to share nude images of themselves with confidantes. Victims were advised to toughen up or go offline.2 The choice was theirs—that was the deal. Since 2007, so much has changed. Cyber harassment’s harms are now part of the national conversation. Perceptions and attitudes have changed,3 thanks in no small part to the work of Cyber Civil Rights Initiative4 (CCRI), End Revenge Porn,5 and Without My Consent,6 advocacy groups devoted to educating the public about online harassment and to spearheading reform. ∗ Lois K. Macht Research Professor & Professor of Law, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law, Senior Fellow, Future of Privacy, Affiliate Scholar, Stanford Center on Internet & Society, Affiliate Fellow, Yale Information Society Project. I am grateful to Co-Dean Michael Scharf, Professor Ray Ku, Stephen Congdon, and the staff of Case Western University’s Journal of Law, Technology, and the Internet who kindly hosted me to talk about my book Hate Crimes in Cyberspace as its first inaugural distinguished speaker. This short piece is adapted from my talk.
    [Show full text]