Bonneville Adoption of the Environmental Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bonneville Adoption of the Environmental Assessment Adopted 09/30/2020 as DOE/EA-2150 By Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville) Bonneville Adoption of the Environmental Assessment Reducing Predation Impacts on At-Risk Fish by California and Steller Sea Lions in the Columbia River Basin National Marine Fisheries Service West Coast Region 1201 Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1100 Portland, OR 97232 August 14, 2020 Cover Sheet Environmental Assessment Reducing Predation Impacts on At-Risk Fish by California and Steller Sea Lions In the Columbia River Basin Proposed Action: Approval with certain conditions of an Application Requesting Authorization to Intentionally Take, by Lethal Methods, California and Steller Sea Lions in the Columbia River Basin Pursuant to Section 120(f) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Responsible Official: Barry A. Thom, Regional Administrator National Marine Fisheries Service West Coast Region 1201 Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1100 Portland, OR 97232 Cooperating Agency: Bonneville Power Administration 905 N.E 11th Avenue Portland, OR 97232 For Further Information: Robert Anderson National Marine Fisheries Service West Coast Region 1201 Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1100 Portland, OR 97232 i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii List of Acronyms List of Acronyms ACC Animal Care Committee AWA Animal Welfare Act BPA Bonneville Power Administration CORPS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CSL California Sea Lions CRITFC Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission DPS Distinct Population Segment EFH Essential Fish Habitat EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act ESU Evolutionarily Significant Unit IACUC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee MMPA Marine Mammal Protection Act NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service NRHP National Register of Historical Places ODFW Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife OSP Optimum Sustainable Population PBR Potential Biological Removal SSL Steller Sea Lions WDFW Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife iii List of Acronyms TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION................................................................ 7 1.1 Bonneville Introduction................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Introduction and Background......................................................................................... 7 1.3 Bonneville Power Administration ................................................................................... 8 1.4 Sea Lion Predation ......................................................................................................10 1.5 Marine Mammal Protection Act Section 120 ...................................................................14 1.6 Marine Mammal Protection Act Section 120(f) ................................................................14 1.7 Proposed Action .........................................................................................................17 1.8 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action.....................................................................18 2. ALTERNATIVES ...............................................................................................................19 2.1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................19 2.1.1 Action Area.............................................................................................................19 2.1.2 MMPA Requirements ...............................................................................................20 2.2 Alternatives................................................................................................................21 2.2.1 Alternative 1 – No Action ..........................................................................................22 2.2.2 Alternative 2 – Lethal and Non-Lethal Removal of Sea Lions...........................................22 2.2.3 Alternative 3 –Lethal and Non-Lethal Removal of Sea Lions and Modified Task Force Recommendations (Proposed Action).......................................................................................28 2.3 Alternatives Considered but Not Analyzed in Detail..........................................................36 3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ...............................................................................................38 3.1 Introduction and Environmental Setting .........................................................................38 3.2 Marine Mammals........................................................................................................42 3.2.1 California Sea Lion (United States Stock) .....................................................................42 3.2.2 Steller Sea Lion (Eastern United States Stock) ..............................................................45 3.2.3 Harbor Seals (Oregon/Washington Coast Stock) ...........................................................46 3.3 Listed Salmonids and Critical Habitat .............................................................................48 3.3.1 Listed Salmonids......................................................................................................48 3.3.2 Designated Critical Habitats ......................................................................................63 3.3.3 Recovery Planning for ESA-Listed Salmonids ................................................................66 3.4 Non-Listed Fish Species ................................................................................................66 3.5 Fish Habitat................................................................................................................68 TOC-3 3.6 Recreation .................................................................................................................68 3.7 Cultural Resources ......................................................................................................70 3.8 Law Enforcement ........................................................................................................73 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ...................................................................................75 4.1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................75 4.2 Marine Mammals........................................................................................................75 4.2.1 Alternative 1 (No Action) ..........................................................................................75 4.2.2 Alternative 2 ...........................................................................................................76 4.2.3 Alternative 3 ..........................................................................................................77 4.3 ESA-Listed Salmonids and Critical Habitat ......................................................................78 ESA-Listed Salmonids..............................................................................................................78 4.3.1 Alternative 1 (No Action) ..........................................................................................78 4.3.2 Alternative 2 ...........................................................................................................79 4.3.3 Alternative 3 ...........................................................................................................80 Designated Critical Habitat ......................................................................................................81 4.4 Non-Listed Fish Species ................................................................................................81 4.5 Fish Habitat................................................................................................................84 4.6 Recreation .................................................................................................................84 4.7 Cultural Resources ......................................................................................................86 4.8 Law Enforcement ........................................................................................................87 5. CUMULATIVE EFFECTS .................................................................................................90 5.1 Climate Change...........................................................................................................90 5.2 Marine Mammals........................................................................................................91 5.3 ESA-Listed and Non-ESA Listed Fish Species ....................................................................92 6.0 AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS CONSULTED .................................................................94 7.0 COORDINATION, CONSULTATION AND COMPLIANCE............................................................96 7.1 National Environmental Policy Act ......................................................................................96 7.2 Endangered Species Act ....................................................................................................96 7.3 Marine Mammal Protection Act Section 120 .......................................................................97 7.4 Marine Mammal Protection Act Section 120(f) ....................................................................97 7.5 National Historic Preservation Act ......................................................................................97
Recommended publications
  • Green Sturgeon French: Esturgeon Vert Finnish: Vihersampi German: Spanish
    1 Proposal II / 16 PROPOSAL FOR INCLUSION OF SPECIES ON THE APPENDICES OF THE CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY SPECIES OF WILD ANIMALS A. PROPOSAL: Inclusion of the following species of Acipenser medirostris in Appendix II of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals: B. PROPONENT: Federal Republic of Germany C. SUPPORTING STATEMENT 1. Taxon 1.1_ Classis: Actinopterygii 1.2 Ordo: Acipenseriformes 1.3 Familia: Acipenseridae 1.4 Species: Acipenser medirostris Ayres, 1854 1.5 Common names: English: Green sturgeon French: Esturgeon vert Finnish: Vihersampi German: Spanish: 2. Biological data 2.1 Distribution Acipenser medirostris is distributed along the Pacific coast of North America from the Aleutian Islands and the Gulf of Alaska to Ensenada, Mexico (Moyle, 1976; Morrow, 1980; Houston, 1988) and is usually found near the mouths estuaries of larger rivers. Presumed spawning populations of Acipenser medirostris presently occur in the Fraser and Skeena Rivers in British Columbia (Canada), in the Rogue River (Oregon, U.S.A.), and in the Klamath, Sacramento and Trinity Rivers (California, U.S.A.) (Houston, 1988; NPSSC, 1993). 2.2 Population Little is known of the status of the Green sturgeon populations and there are no estimates of the total size of the population. In Canadian waters the species is considered to be rare and the adult populations are estimated to be in the low thousands, the estimation based on catch statistics, average weights and comparison to the partly sympatric White sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus (Houston, 1988). In the coastal waters and rivers of the U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Yangtze Sturgeon (Acipenser Dabryanus) - Sturgeons
    Pond Life - Yangtze Sturgeon (Acipenser dabryanus) - Sturgeons http://www.pond-life.me.uk/sturgeon/acipenserdabryanus.php Search Pond Life... Home Sturgeons Koi Other Fish Fish Health Ponds Plants Forums Contents Yangtze Sturgeon (Acipenser dabryanus) Home Sturgeons Acipenseriformes Sturgeon Food & Feeding Sturgeon Care Sheet Sturgeon Guide Sturgeon Species List Adriatic Sturgeon Alabama Sturgeon Amu Darya Sturgeon Amur Sturgeon Atlantic Sturgeon Beluga Sturgeon Chinese Paddlefish Chinese Sturgeon Yangtze Sturgeon (Acipenser dabryanus) photo from the website of CAFS Common Sturgeon (http://zzzy.fishinfo.cn/) Diamond Sturgeon Dwarf Sturgeon by Karen Paul Green Sturgeon Description: The Yangtze Sturgeon (Acipenser dabryanus) has 8-13 dorsal scutes, 26-39 lateral Gulf Sturgeon scutes, 9-13 ventral scutes, 44-57 dorsal fin rays and 25-36 anal fin rays. Colouration ranges from Kaluga Sturgeon dark grey to brown-grey on the back to white on the ventral side. The body is rough because it is Lake Sturgeon covered with small pointed denticles. The four barbels are located closer to the mouth than the end Paddlefish of the snout. The Yangtze Sturgeon can reach 1.3 meters in length and a weight of 16kg. Pallid Sturgeon Persian Sturgeon Sakhalin Sturgeon Ship Sturgeon Shortnose Sturgeon Shovelnose Sturgeon Siberian Sturgeon Stellate Sturgeon Sterlet Syr Darya Sturgeon White Sturgeon Yangtze Sturgeon Sturgeon Videos Koi Other Fish Fish Health Yangtze Sturgeon (Acipenser dabryanus) photo from the website of CAFS Ponds (http://zzzy.fishinfo.cn/) Plants Forums Wild Distribution: Asia; restricted to the upper and middle reaches of the Yangtze River system, Search rarely seen below the Gezhouba Dam. The Yangtze Sturgeon is a potamodromous (freshwater only) species.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Sustainable Use of Wild Sturgeon Populations of the NW Black Sea and Lower Danube River in Romania
    Conservation and sustainable use of wild sturgeon populations of the NW Black Sea and Lower Danube River in Romania Raluca Elena Rogin Marine Coastal Development Submission date: June 2011 Supervisor: Egil Sakshaug, IBI Norwegian University of Science and Technology Department of Biology Abstract Sturgeons belong to one of the oldest families of bony fish in existence, having their first appearance in the fossil records approximately 200 million years ago. Their natural habitats are found in the subtropical, temperate and sub-Arctic rivers, lakes and coastlines of Eurasia and North America. In the Romanian waters, five anadromous species of sturgeon, out of the total 25 species known by science, once migrated from the Black Sea into the Danube for spawning: beluga; Huso huso , Russian sturgeon; Acipenser gueldenstaedtii , stellate sturgeon; A. stellatus , ship sturgeon; A. nudiventris and the European Atlantic sturgeon; A. sturio (Knight, 2009). The NW Black Sea and Lower Danube River sturgeons, like many Acipenserids, were seriously affected by the rapid changes brought by human development. Being one of the finest caviar producers in the world they were intensively harvested for many centuries. Heavy uncontrolled fishing and destruction of habitat led to the collapse of most of the Acipenserids and the total disappearance of the European Atlantic sturgeon (A. sturio ) from the NW Black Sea. Worldwide public attention was focused on sturgeon conservation after their listing in the IUCN Red List of Threatened species in 1996. In 1998, after evaluating their abundance in the wild, CITES also decided to strictly regulate the international trade in all Acipenserids. The paper aims to analyze and review conservation measures that were taken locally, nationally and internationally by humans and the effect they had on one of Europe’s only naturally reproducing sturgeon populations.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH AMERICAN GREEN STURGEON (Acipenser Medirostris) AS an ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES UNDER the ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT
    PETITION TO LIST THE NORTH AMERICAN GREEN STURGEON (Acipenser medirostris) AS AN ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION CENTER CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY WATERKEEPERS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA PETITIONERS JUNE 2001 NOTICE OF PETITION Environmental Protection Information Center P.O. Box 397 Garberville, CA 95542 (707) 923-2931 Contact: Cynthia Elkins Center for Biological Diversity P.O. Box 40090 Berkeley, CA 94704 (510) 841-0812 Contact: Jeff Miller WaterKeepers Northern California Presidio Building 1004 San Francisco, CA 94129 (415) 561.2299 ext. 14 Contact: Jonathan Kaplan Petitioners Environmental Protection Information Center (“EPIC”), Center for Biological Diversity (“CBD”), and WaterKeepers Northern California (“WaterKeepers”) formally request that the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) list the North American green sturgeon (Acipenser medirostris) as an endangered species under the federal Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531-1544. In the alternative, petitioners formally request that NMFS list the North American green sturgeon as a threatened species under the ESA. In either case, petitioners request that green sturgeon critical habitat be designated concurrent with the listing designation. This petition is filed under §553(e) of the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA” - 5 U.S.C. §§ 551-559), §1533(b)(3) of the ESA, and 50 C.F.R. §424.14(b). This petition sets in motion a specific administrative process as defined by §1533(b)(3) and 50 C.F.R. §424.14(b), placing mandatory response requirements on NMFS. Because A. medirostris is an anadromous fish, NMFS has jurisdiction over this petition. A Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) between NMFS and the U.
    [Show full text]
  • Caviar and Conservation
    Caviar and Conservation Status, Management, and Trade of North American Sturgeon and Paddlefish Douglas F.Williamson May 2003 TRAFFIC North America World Wildlife Fund 1250 24th Street NW Washington DC 20037 Visit www.traffic.org for an electronic edition of this report, and for more information about TRAFFIC North America. © 2003 WWF. All rights reserved by World Wildlife Fund, Inc. All material appearing in this publication is copyrighted and may be reproduced with permission. Any reproduction, in full or in part, of this publication must credit TRAFFIC North America. The views of the author expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the TRAFFIC Network, World Wildlife Fund (WWF), or IUCN-The World Conservation Union. The designation of geographical entities in this publication and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The TRAFFIC symbol copyright and Registered Trademark ownership are held by WWF. TRAFFIC is a joint program of WWF and IUCN. Suggested citation: Williamson, D. F. 2003. Caviar and Conservation: Status, Management and Trade of North American Sturgeon and Paddlefish. TRAFFIC North America. Washington D.C.: World Wildlife Fund. Front cover photograph of a lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) by Richard T. Bryant, courtesy of the Tennessee Aquarium. Back cover photograph of a paddlefish (Polyodon spathula) by Richard T. Bryant, courtesy of the Tennessee Aquarium. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface .
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic and Demographic Implications of Aquaculture in White Sturgeon (Acipenser Transmontanus) Conservation
    1733 Genetic and demographic implications of aquaculture in white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) conservation Henriette I. Jager Abstract: This study uses a genetic individual-based model of white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) populations in a river to examine the genetic and demographic trade-offs associated with operating a conservation hatchery. Simula- tion experiments evaluated three management practices: (i) setting quotas to equalize family contributions in an effort to prevent genetic swamping, (ii) an adaptive management scheme that interrupts stocking when introgression exceeds a specified threshold, and (iii) alternative broodstock selection strategies that influence domestication. The first set of simulations, designed to evaluate equalizing the genetic contribution of families, did not show the genetic benefits expected. The second set of simulations showed that simulated adaptive management was not successful in controlling introgression over the long term, especially with uncertain feedback. The third set of simulations compared the effects of three alternative broodstock selection strategies on domestication for hypothetical traits controlling early density-dependent survival. Simulated aquaculture selected for a density-tolerant phenotype when broodstock were taken from a genetically connected population. Using broodstock from an isolated population (i.e., above an upstream barrier or in a different watershed) was more effective at preventing domestication than using wild broodstock from a connected population.
    [Show full text]
  • Seals and Sea Lions in the Columbia River
    Seals and Sea Lions in the Columbia River: An Evaluation and Summary of Research By Deward E. Walker, Jr., Ph.D. WALKER RESEARCH GROUP, LTD. June 2015 Table of Contents I. Introduction and Methodology ................................................................................................ 1 A. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 B. Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 4 II. Pinniped Predation .................................................................................................................. 7 A. Pinniped Ranges ..................................................................................................................... 7 B. Pinniped Increases .................................................................................................................. 7 C. Mitigation Efforts at Bonneville Dam .................................................................................. 13 D. Effects of Pinneped Predation on Tribes .............................................................................. 16 III. Traditional Tribal Uses of Seals and Sea Lions ................................................................. 17 A. The Traditional Presence of Seals and Sea Lions in the Columbia River ............................ 18 B. Tribal Use of Seals and Sea Lions .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sturgeon and Paddlefish Life History and Management: Experts’ Knowledge and Beliefs
    Received: 18 May 2017 | Accepted: 16 June 2017 DOI: 10.1111/jai.13563 STURGEON PAPER Sturgeon and paddlefish life history and management: Experts’ knowledge and beliefs I. Jarić1,2,3 | C. Riepe1,4 | J. Gessner1 1Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany Summary 2Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Although sturgeons and paddlefish represent a highly endangered species group, Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České knowledge regarding their ecology, life history and management and restoration Budějovice, Czech Republic measures still reveals substantial gaps and uncertainties. As such, it was hypothesized 3Institute for Multidisciplinary Research, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, that the information on overall experiences and perspectives of researchers working Serbia in the field would provide a good indication of the state of knowledge, and help iden- 4Thünen-Institute of Baltic Sea Fisheries, Rostock, Germany tify areas for further investigation. To gain in- depth insight into their perspectives on a variety of topics related to sturgeon life history, management and conservation, as Correspondence Ivan Jarić, Biology Centre of the Czech well as opinions on issues characterized by a lack of data, a worldwide online survey Academy of Sciences, Institute of was conducted among scientists specializing in sturgeon and paddlefish research. Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. With a total of 277 respondents, the response rate was good (40.3% of those invited). Email: [email protected]; [email protected] The survey results indicated a high level of uncertainty with regard to various aspects of sturgeon life history, such as spawning migrations, reproduction and senescence. Responses differed largely with the origin and the research focus of the participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Vi Fishery-At-A-Glance: White Sturgeon Scientific Name
    Fishery-at-a-Glance: White Sturgeon Scientific Name: Acipenser transmontanus Range: In saltwater, White Sturgeon range from Ensenada, Mexico northward to the Gulf of Alaska, but tend to spend much of their time in freshwater and estuarine habitats. Habitat: White Sturgeon primarily inhabit estuaries of large rivers. Size (length and weight): White Sturgeon can grow to be greater than 6 meters (20 feet) long and 630 kilograms (1,389 pounds). Life span: The maximum age is unknown, but White Sturgeon may live to be greater than 100 years. Reproduction: White Sturgeon move upstream to lay their eggs in coarse substrates, and reproduction only occurs in large rivers such as the Sacramento River. Females spawn every 2 to 5 years after reaching 12 to 16 years-old, while males spawn every 1 to 2 years after reaching 10 to 12 years-old. In the Sacramento and San Joaquin river systems, spawning success appears related to high outflows during spring. Prey: Young White Sturgeon feed on small crustaceans and aquatic insects. Diet broadens with growth to include a variety of bottom dwelling invertebrates, including primarily clams, crabs and shrimps, but also fish and fish eggs in certain circumstances (e.g., Eulachon, sculpins, lamprey, and spawning Pacific Herring). Predators: Sculpins, Walleye, Smallmouth Bass and Chinook Salmon are known to prey on eggs and juvenile White Sturgeon less than 1 year-old. Sea Lions and some shark species have been observed to prey upon older juvenile and adult White Sturgeon. The armored bony scutes along the body of juveniles and adults probably reduce predation relative to earlier life stages.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sturgeon (Acipenseriformes)
    Vol. 31: 203–210, 2016 ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH Published October 31 doi: 10.3354/esr00767 Endang Species Res OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS REVIEW A global perspective of fragmentation on a declining taxon — the sturgeon (Acipenseriformes) Tim J. Haxton1,*, Tim M. Cano2 1Aquatic Research and Monitoring Section, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 1600 West Bank Dr., Peterborough, ON K9L 0G2, Canada 2Northwest Regional Operations Division, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 173 25th Side Road, Rosslyn, ON P7K 0B9, Canada ABSTRACT: Acipenseriformes (sturgeons and paddlefishes) are considered to be one of the most globally imperiled taxon, with 25 of the 27 species listed by the International Union for the Con- servation of Nature (IUCN). Overharvest, habitat degradation, fragmentation and water quality issues have contributed to their decline worldwide. These stressors have been ameliorated in some areas, but in others they remain a limiting factor to sturgeon. Barriers impeding upstream migrations to natural spawning areas and manifesting alterations to natural flows continue to com- promise sturgeon recruitment and limit natural recovery. Watersheds in the Northern Hemisphere have been categorized as being strongly affected, moderately affected or unaffected based on the degree of fragmentation and water flow regulation. An overlay (i.e. intersect) of the sturgeons’ sta- tus with this watershed categorization revealed that a small area remains in which sturgeon are not considered at risk and where rivers are unaffected in northern Canada. These relatively unperturbed populations provide a much needed opportunity to learn about sturgeon biology, habitat needs and reproductive potential in a natural riverine environment, which may facilitate conservation and recovery efforts in affected watersheds.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Research Report 1936 December 9, 1985
    1 9 3 6 A Partial Bibliography for the Sturgeon Family Acipenseridae · Eric R. Anderson Fisheries Research Report No. 1936 December 9, 1985 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES DIVISION Fisheries Research Report 1936 December 9, 1985 A PARTIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR THE STURGEON FAMILY ACIPENSERIDAE Eric R. Anderson 2 INTRODUCTION Sturgeon are large, primitive fishes that mature late, are long-lived, and occur in both freshwater and marine systems throughout the world. The bibliography presented here consists of 288 references divided into systematics and distribution, biology, management, morphology, physiology, and fish health for 23 species of the genera Acipenser, Huso, Pseudoscaphirhynchus, and Scaphirhvnchus. In the biology section, references are further subdivided into general biology, reproduction, feeding and locomotion, early life history, and age and growth. In the management section, references are subdivided into fishery history, population dynamics, and cultural practices. Within each section references are arranged in alphabetical order by the author's surname. 3 SYSTEMATICS AND DISTRIBUTION Bailey, R. M., and F. B. Cross. 1954. River sturgeons of the American genus Scaphirhynchus: characters, distribution, and synonymy. Paper of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters 39:169-208. Bajkov, A. D. 1955. White sturgeon with seven rows of scutes. California Fish and Game 41:347-348. Cooper, E. L. 1957. What kind of sturgeon is it? Wisconsin Conservation Bulletin 22:31. Eddy, S. 1945. Paddlefish and sturgeon. Geological relics among Minnesota fishes. The Conservation Volunteer 8:29-32. Filippov, G. M. 1976. Some data on the biology of the beluga Huso huso from the south­ eastern part of the Caspian Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Phylogeny of Sturgeons
    Morphological Phylogeny of Sturgeons Biological Classification of Sturgeons and Paddlefishes Kingdom Anamalia Multicellular organism Phylum Chordata Vertebrates Superclass Osteichthyes Bony Fishes Class Actinopterygii Ray-finned fishes Subclass Chondrostei Cartilaginous and ossified bony fish Order Acipenseriformes Sturgeons and Paddlefishes Family Acipenseridae Sturgeons Genus Species Acipenser Huso Pseudoscaphirhynchus Scaphirhynchus Family Polydontidae Paddlefishes Genus Species Polydon Psephurus Currently there are 31 species within the order “Acipenseriformes” which contains two paddlefish species and 29 sturgeon species. Sturgeons and paddlefishes are a unique order of fishes due to their interesting physical and internal morphological characteristics. Polydontidae Acipenseridae Acipenser Huso Scaphirhynchus Pseudoscaphirhynchus Sturgeons and Paddlefishes Acipenseriformes Teleostei Holostei Chondrostei Polypteriformes Birchirs and Reedfishes Ray-Finned Bony Fishes • •Dorsal Finlets Jawed Fishes •Ganoid Scales •Cartilaginous Skeleton Actinopterygii •Rudimentary Lungs •Paired Fins •Heterocercal Tail Osteichthyes Sarcopterygii Sharks, Skates, Rays (Bony Fishes) Lobe-Finned Bony Fishes Chondrichthyes Coelacanth, Lungfishes, tetrapods •Fleshy, Lobed, Paired Fins •Complex Limbs •Enamel Covered Teeth Agnatha •Symmetrical Tail Lamprey, Hagfish •Jawless Fishes •Distinct Notocord •Paired Fins Absent Acipenseriformes likely evolved between the late Jurassic and early Cretaceous geological periods (70 to 170 million years ago). The word “sturgeon”
    [Show full text]