DOCSLIB.ORG

El Sereno Park Improvement Project Draft Environmental Impact Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
El Sereno Park Improvement Project Draft Environmental Impact Report EL SERENO PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Prepared for CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND PARKS Prepared by TERRY A. HAYES ASSOCIATES INC. October 2015 TAHA 2014-035 EL SERENO PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2014031041 Prepared for: CITY OF LOS ANGELES Department of Recreation and Parks 221 North Figueroa Street, Suite 100 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Prepared by: TERRY A. HAYES ASSOCIATES INC. 8522 National Boulevard, Suite 102 Culver City, CA 90232 October 2015 El Sereno Park Improvement Project Table of Contents Draft EIR TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose of this Report ............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Authorization and Focus.......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Lead Agency............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.4 Intended Use of this Draft EIR ................................................................................................ 1-2 1.5 Draft EIR Organization............................................................................................................ 1-2 1.6 Public Review and Comments................................................................................................. 1-2 1.7 Areas of Controversy/Issues to be Resolved ........................................................................... 1-3 2.0 SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Summary of the Proposed Project ........................................................................................... 2-2 2.3 Significant and Unavoidable Impacts...................................................................................... 2-2 2.4 Significant Impacts that can be Mitigated to Less Than Significant ....................................... 2-2 2.5 Less-Than-Significant or No Impact ....................................................................................... 2-2 2.6 Summary of Alternatives......................................................................................................... 2-2 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Project Background ................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Project Objectives.................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 Location and Surrounding Land Uses ..................................................................................... 3-3 3.4 Project Description .................................................................................................................. 3-3 3.5 Construction Schedule and Phasing ............................................................................ 3-3 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Cultural Resources ................................................................................................... 4.1-1 4.2 Noise and Vibration ................................................................................................. 4.2-1 5.0 ALTERNATIVES............................................................................................................................ 5-1 5.1 Project-Level Impacts........................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Alternatives to the Proposed Project .................................................................................... 5-2 6.0 OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS........................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Significant Environmental Effects of the Proposed Project ................................................. 6-1 6.2 Significant Environmental Effects that Cannot be Avoided in the Proposed Project is Implemented......................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.3 Growth Inducing Impacts..................................................................................................... 6-1 6.4 Significant Irreversible Environmental Effects .................................................................... 6-2 6.5 Effects Determined not to be Significant ............................................................................. 6-2 7.0 SOURCES CONSULTED .............................................................................................................. 7-1 7.1 References ............................................................................................................................ 7-1 7.2 Preparers of this EIR ............................................................................................................ 7-1 APPENDICES Appendix A – Notice of Preparation, Initial Study, and NOP Comment Letters Appendix B – Noise Appendix C – Cultural Resources taha 2014-035 ii El Sereno Park Improvement Project Table of Contents Draft EIR TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) Page FIGURES Figure 3-1 Project Site Location Map ....................................................................................................... 3-2 Figure 3-2 Project Site Aerial Map ........................................................................................................... 3-4 Figure 3-3 Project Site Photos................................................................................................................... 3-5 Figure 3-4 Proposed Project Concept Plan................................................................................................ 3-6 Figure 4.2-1 A-Weighted Decibel Scale ................................................................................................... 4.2-2 Figure 4.2-2 Noise Monitoring Locations and Sensitive Receptors.......................................................... 4.2-6 TABLES Table 2-1 Significant of Impacts and Mitigation Measures..................................................................... 2-4 Table 4.1-1 Previous Cultural Resources Studies within Quarter-Mile of the Project Area.................... 4.1-8 Table 4.1-2 Previously Recorded Cultural Resources within Quarter-Mile of the Project Area............. 4.1-9 Table 4.2-1 Guidelines for Noise Compatible Land Use......................................................................... 4.2-4 Table 4.2-2 Vibration Damage Criteria ................................................................................................... 4.2-5 Table 4.2-3 Existing Noise Levels........................................................................................................... 4.2-5 Table 4.2-4 Maximum Noise Levels of Common Construction Machines ............................................. 4.2-9 Table 4.2-5 Typical Construction Noise Levels – Unmitigated............................................................... 4.2-9 Table 4.2-6 Typical Construction Noise Levels – Mitigated................................................................. 4.2-11 taha 2014-035 iii El Sereno Park Improvement Project 1.0 Introduction Draft EIR 1.0 INTRODUCTION This chapter provides an overview of the purpose and focus of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR), a discussion of the intended use of this Draft EIR, a description of the organization of the Draft EIR, and a discussion of the public review process and potential areas of controversy. 1.1 PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT The purpose of an EIR, as defined in Section 15121 (a) of the State Guidelines for the implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 “Guidelines,” is to “inform public agency decision-makers and the public generally of the potential significant environmental effects of a project, identify possible ways to minimize the significant effect, and describe reasonable alternatives to the project.” This document assesses the potential significant environmental impacts, including significant and unavoidable impacts and cumulative impacts, resulting from the El Sereno Park Improvement Project (proposed project). Where there is potential for a significant adverse effect, this report identifies mitigation measures that would either eliminate the impact or reduce the effect to a less-than-significant level. 1.2 AUTHORIZATION AND FOCUS This Draft EIR has been prepared in accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended to date. Specifically, this document evaluates the environmental effects that could result from implementation of the proposed project. The following topic areas are addressed in this Draft EIR: Cultural Resources Noise and Vibration The City of Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks (LADRP) determined through the Initial Study
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chamber Addresses Jobs and the Economy at L.A. City Hall Standing
    Chamber VOICE IN THIS ISSUE: 10 ways the Chamber helped L.A. business this quarter 3 Chamber Southern California Leadership Network grooms leaders 4 Chamber forms new Non Profit Council 6 FALL 2007 • VolumE 6 • issue 4 VOICE A quarterly publication of the Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce Chamber addresses jobs and the economy at L.A. Standing with the City Hall Governor on health care reform The Chamber advocated for issues important to the City of Los Angeles at annual Access L.A. City Hall event he Los early 400 business leaders Garcetti echoed the need for more Angeles gathered for the Los collaboration, mentioning his efforts to Area Angeles Area Chamber make the council more aware of business Chamber of of Commerce’s annual issues through the creation of the Jobs, Commerce Access L.A. City Hall event Business Growth and Tax Reform endorsed Gov. committee. Chick suggested Arnold Schwarzenegger’s the need for a citywide health care reform economic development proposal in September, making it one of the first policy that would help business organizations to businesses grow and plan for come out in support of their future. the plan. Throughout the morning, The proposal includes a Chamber members heard 4 percent payroll fee on REFORMING HEALTH CARE. Chamber Board Chair David Fleming, Latham & Watkins, LLP, and Chamber President & CEO Gary Toebben discuss health care from more than 30 civic employers with 10 or with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger after a Capitol News Conference on Sept. 17. leaders and lawmakers on more employees who do key issues in Los Angeles.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Mayors to Meet with President Barack Obama at the White House on Friday, February 20, 2009
    For Immediate Release: Contact: Elena Temple Wednesday, February 19, 2009 202-309-4906 ([email protected]) Carlos Vogel 202-257-9797 ([email protected]) U.S. MAYORS TO MEET WITH PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA AT THE WHITE HOUSE ON FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2009 Washington, D.C. – The nation’s mayors have been invited by U.S. President Barack Obama and U.S. Vice President Joseph Biden to the White House for a meeting with The Conference of Mayors leadership on the morning of Friday, February 20, 2009. Led by U.S. Conference of Mayors President Miami Mayor Manny Diaz, over 60 mayors will also meet with Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr., Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, Energy Secretary Dr. Steven Chu, Education Secretary Arne Duncan and White House Senior Staff. The mayors meeting with President Obama and Vice President Biden will take place from 10:30 a.m. to 11:15 a.m. in the East Room of the White House and will be OPEN to the press. The mayors will also hold a press availability at the White House at 11:30 a.m. immediately following the meeting (location is TBD). Following the White House meeting, the mayors will gather at the Capitol Hilton in Washington, D.C. for a session with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson, U.S. Department of Energy Weatherization Program Director Gil Sperling, and U.S. Department of Justice COPS Office Acting Director Tim Quinn. This meeting is CLOSED to the press. The nation’s mayors commend President Obama and Congress for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which is in line with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 12Th Grade Curriculum
    THE TOM BRADLEY PROJECT STANDARDS: 12.6.6 Evaluate the rolls of polls, campaign advertising, and controversies over campaign funding. 12.6.6 Analyze trends in voter turnout. COMMON CORE STATE KEY TERMS AND ESSAY QUESTION STANDARDS CONTENT Reading Standards for Literacy in elections History/Social Studies 6-12 How did the election of Tom shared power Bradley in 1973 reflect the local responsibilities and Writing Standard for Literacy in building of racial coalitions in authority History/Social Studies 6-12 voting patterns in the 1970s and Text Types and Purpose the advancement of minority 2. Write informative/explanatory texts, opportunities? including the narration of historical events, scientific procedures/experiments, or technical processes. B. Develop the topic with relevant, well-chosen facts, definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and expamples LESSON OVERVIEW MATERIALS Doc. A LA Times on Voter turnout, May 15, 2003 Day 1 View Module 2 of Tom Bradley video. Doc. B Voter turnout spreadsheet May 15, 2003 (edited) Read Tom Bradley biography. Doc. C Statistics May 15,2003 Day 2 Doc. D Tom Bradley biography Analyze issues related to voter turnout in Doc. E Census, 2000 2013 Los Angeles Mayoral Election and Doc, F1973 Mayoral election connections to the 1973 campaign for Doc .G Interview 1973 Mayor. Doc. H Election Night speech 1989 Day 3 Doc I LA Times Bradley’s first year 1974 Analyze issues in 1973 campaign. Doc. J LA Times Campaign issues 1973 Analyze building of racial coalitions Doc K LA Times articles 1973 among voters. Day 4 Doc. L LA Times campaign issues 1973 Write essay.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Is Not Without Its Advantages
    Sex is not without its advantages Now that the baseball season in town is effectively over, cook up a good local sex scandal or two to divert attention away from these far more serious issues. July 25, 2013 By Allen R. Sanderson As Chicago's homicide rate and Illinois' pension crisis continue to garner national media attention and spiral out of control, our city and state politicians are Nero-like in their responses. We need some bold action, or at least diversion, and soon, or we risk sinking even lower on the political radar screen — we are only fifth in state population and thanks to Toronto, we are now the fifth-largest city in North America. The "flyover" section of our country has a lot to learn from the coasts — and even abroad. Thus I offer this humble suggestion: Now that the baseball season in town is effectively over, cook up a good local sex scandal or two to divert attention away from these far more serious issues. I'm not asking for an Anthony Weiner on any given day. And not even a John Edwards. But can't we at least produce in this city and state someone on the order of Eliot Spitzer or Silvio Berlusconi? I'd even settle for Mark Sanford or David Vitter. Sure, we have had more than our fair share of high-profile felons — former Govs. Rod Blagojevich, George Ryan, Dan Walker, Otto Kerner. But for what? Corruption, racketeering, bribery, fraud. Boring stuff. Where were the sexting emails, prostitutes, strippers, mistresses, photos of a blue dress or the Appalachian Trail? Our about-one-scandal-per-year Chicago aldermen have gotten their three squares a day at the public trough for the mundane: corruption, bribery, tax evasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Federal Role to Work with Communities to Prevent and Respond to Gang Violence: the Gang Abatement and Prevention Act of 2007
    S. HRG. 110–444 EXAMINING THE FEDERAL ROLE TO WORK WITH COMMUNITIES TO PREVENT AND RESPOND TO GANG VIOLENCE: THE GANG ABATEMENT AND PREVENTION ACT OF 2007 HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JUNE 5, 2007 Serial No. J–110–40 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 43–451 PDF WASHINGTON : 2008 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Aug 31 2005 13:25 Aug 04, 2008 Jkt 043451 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\43451.TXT SJUD1 PsN: CMORC COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont, Chairman EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah HERB KOHL, Wisconsin CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California JON KYL, Arizona RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois JOHN CORNYN, Texas BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island TOM COBURN, Oklahoma BRUCE A. COHEN, Chief Counsel and Staff Director MICHAEL O’NEILL, Republican Chief Counsel and Staff Director (II) VerDate Aug 31 2005 13:25 Aug 04, 2008 Jkt 043451 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\43451.TXT SJUD1 PsN: CMORC C O N T E N T S STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Page Feinstein, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • When Mayors Use School Choice As a Reform Strategy
    When Mayors Use School Choice as a Reform Strategy by Kenneth K. Wong Brown University Box 1938, 21 Manning Walk Providence, RI 02912 Phone: 401-863-1486 Email: [email protected] Francis X. Shen Harvard University 1737 Cambridge St. Cambridge, MA 02138 Email: [email protected] Lauren M. Pachucki Vanderbilt University Email: [email protected] Paper prepared for the 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 7- 11, 2006, San Francisco, CA Wong, Shen, & Pachucki Mayors & School Choice Page 1 When Mayors Use School Choice as a Reform Strategy I. INTRODUCTION All political scientists who study education policy start their analysis with a similar premise: “educational reform does not take place in political vacuum.”1 Studies of the politics of school choice have focused primarily on state-level political dynamics (Mintrom 2000, Henig, et. al. 2002, Wong & Shen 2004). This line of research makes sense since the charter school market is initially created and subsequently altered by the state legislature. In this paper, however, we break from this trend and focus our attention on local government and the politics of school choice. Specifically, we examine the relationship between school choice and big city mayors. Our preliminary analysis finds that mayoral positions on school choice is influenced not only the existing legislation governing school choice in their city, but also by their city’s size and racial composition. Although the state legislature writes the charter school or voucher laws, mayors play important roles in the legislative and policy enactment process. At the legislative level, mayors can influence the type of laws that are enacted by working with state legislators and lobbying for more choice options.
    [Show full text]
  • Xxxx Xx, 2010
    September 20, 2010 The Honorable Harry Reid The Honorable Nancy Pelosi Majority Leader Speaker of the House United States Senate U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20515 The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable John A. Boehner Minority Leader Minority Leader United States Senate U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20515 Dear Senator Reid, Senator McConnell, Madam Speaker and Mr. Boehner, As members of Building America’s Future, we write to urge action by the House and Senate on legislation that will create a National Infrastructure Bank to help our cities and states find additional methods of financing for projects of regional and national significance. President Obama reiterated his support for this idea on September 6, 2010 and we applaud that announcement. As you may know, the U.S. Conference of Mayors recently endorsed this concept for its potential to correct the dire state of disrepair in which we find our nation’s infrastructure – our roads, bridges, transit systems, drinking and waste water systems and our broadband network. The House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Select Revenue Measures recently held a hearing during which Governor Ed Rendell (D-PA) and Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa (D-Los Angeles) testified about the need for a new entity to focus our nation’s investment power around key projects of regional and national significance. Congress has failed to pass a six-year transportation bill and, as a result, there is no national vision as to how we will plan for the next decade and more. The economic challenges we still face are all the more reason for us to look to the future and find new ways to create jobs, rebuild our decaying infrastructure, improve our quality of life, increase safety and keep our nation economically competitive.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Datastream
    Twenty-First Century Black Mayors, Non-Majority Black Cities, And the Representation of Black Interests By Ravi Kumar Perry A.B., University of Michigan, 2004 A.M., Brown University, 2006 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science at Brown University Providence, Rhode Island May 2009 © Copyright 2009 by Ravi K. Perry iii This dissertation by Ravi Kumar Perry is accepted in its present form by the Department of Political Science as satisfying the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date_____________ _________________________________ Marion Orr, Ph.D., Advisor Recommended to the Graduate Council Date_____________ _________________________________ James Morone, Ph.D., Reader Date_____________ _________________________________ Wendy Schiller, Ph.D., Reader Date_____________ _________________________________ Darrell West, Ph.D., Reader Approved by the Graduate Council Date_____________ _________________________________ Sheila Bonde, Ph.D., Dean of the Graduate School iv CURRICULUM VITAE Ravi Kumar Perry 144 S. Fitzhugh St. Telephone: (401) 261-7395 Apartment #1 (585) 275-5149 Rochester, NY 14608 Email: [email protected] Education 2005-current Ph.D. (Expected May 2009), Brown University, Political Science Dissertation: “21st Century Black Mayors, Non-Majority Black Cities, and the Representation of Black Interests.” The dissertation is an examination of the conditions under which Black mayors of non-majority Black cities actively pursue policies designed to improve the quality of life of Black residents and examines the implications of two phenomena: demographic changes in many American cities that are steadily reversing the population dynamics that brought about the election of this nation’s first African-American mayors and how the election of a Black mayor is viewed by Black residents with high expectations and as a result as an opportunity to see city government work in their interests and to address inequities.
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICATS MAYORS SUPPORT America Fast Forward
    america’s mayors support America Fast Forward Transportation Bonds George K. Heartwell Neil M. O'Leary Grand Rapids, MI Waterbury, CT Sally Hutton Gerald D. Jennings Albany, NY Richmond, IN Michael Bloomberg Peter Lewis Steve Hogan Elizabeth Tisdahl New York, NY Aurora, CO Evanston, IL Auburn, WA Stephanie A. Miner Jerry DiTullio Syracuse, NY Wheat Ridge, CO Rahm Emanuel Michael D. Bissonnette Ralph Becker Chicago, IL Salt Lake City, UT David C. Hartzell, Jr. Chicopee, MA Clarence, NY David Coss J. Michael Houston Andy Hafen Santa Fe, NM Springfield, IL Jon Mitchell Henderson, NV New Bedford, MA Robert Scott Sioux City, IA Kevin Johnson Sacramento, CA Scott Avedisian Warwick, RI Ed Lee Alberto G. Santos San Francisco, CA Kearny, NJ Antonio Villaraigosa J. Richard Gray Los Angeles, CA Lancaster, PA Rick Gibbs Greg Fischer Stephanie Rawlings-Blake Murrieta, CA Louisville, KY Baltimore, MD Kathleen DeRosa Lioneld Jordan Paul D. Fraim Cathedral City, CA Fayetteville, AR Norfolk, VA Cheryl Cox Scott Smith William Bell Chula Vista, CA Mesa, AZ Durham, NC John Cook Kasim Reed El Paso, TX Atlanta, GA Beth Van Duyne Mitchell Landrieu John Marks Irving, TX New Orleans, LA Tallahasee, FL Raul G. Salinas Sandra Bradbury Laredo, TX Pinellas Park, FL Barrington Russell, Sr. Lauderdale Lakes, FL Full listing on reverse. america’s mayors support America Fast Forward Transportation Bonds Don Plusquellic Akron, OH Karen Weitkunat Fort Collins, CO Maria “Mayita” Melendez Ponce, PR Gerald D. Jennings Albany, NY George K. Heartwell Grand Rapids, MI Charlie Hales Portland, OR Kasim Reed Atlanta, GA Andy Hafen Henderson, NV Bill Gillespie, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Recipient Committee Campaign Statement Cover Page CA 460 FORM (Government Code Sections 84200-84216.5) NAME of FILER I.D
    Recipient Committee Campaign Statement Cover Page CA 460 FORM (Government Code Sections 84200-84216.5) NAME OF FILER I.D. NUMBER Election Date: Statement Period Villaraigosa for Mayor 991904 (Month/Day/Year) from 03/25/2001 04/10/2001 to 04/04/2001 Cover Page 1. Type of Recipient Committee Officeholder, Candidate Controlled Committee 2. Type of Statement Pre-Election Statement 3. Committee Information Committee Name : Villaraigosa for Mayor - 991904 Committee Address : address redacted Los Angeles, CA 90017 (213) 623-9704 Mailing Address (if different) : Fax Number : (213) 623-4619 E-Mail Address : Treasurer Name : Stephen J Kaufman Treasurer Address and Phone Number : address redacted Los Angeles, CA 90017 (213) 623-9704 Assistant Treasurer Name : Assistant Treasurer Address and Phone Number : Treasurer Fax Number : None Treasurer E-Mail Address : None 4. Verification I have used all reasonable diligence and to the best of my knowledge the treasurer has used all reasonable diligence in preparing this statement. I have reviewed the statement and to the best of my knowledge the information contained herein and in the attached schedules is true and complete. I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. *** This document was not electronically signed. The original signed paper copy can be obtained by request. *** Recipient Committee Campaign Statement Cover Page - Part 2 CA 460 FORM (Government Code Sections 84200-84216.5) NAME OF FILER I.D. NUMBER Election Date: Statement
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Californian 24
    AT·H·E~ HISTORICAL TheSout ern SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Californian The Historical Society of Southern California Fall 2012 Volume 24 Number 3 OFFICERS John 0. Pohlmann, Ph.D PRESIDENT Kenneth H. Marcus, Ph.D F1RSTV1CE PRESIDENT Linda Molino, Ph.D SECOND VICE PRESIDENT William J. Barger, Ph.D TREASURER DIRECTORS Greg Fischer Steve Hackel Cecilia Rasmussen Paul Spitzzeri AnnWalnum ADVISORY DIRECTOR Kevin Starr Pat Adler-Ingram, Ph.D ExECVTIVE DIRECTOR ESOUTI-lERN CALIFORNIAN is published quarterly by the Historical Society of Southern California, PHOTO: Charles F. Lummis, 1905 Twelve million flowers to the acre a California non-profit organization (SO I)(c)(3) Haunted by Hundreds of Amiable Ghosts Romualdo Valenzuela NEWSLETTER lAYOLJf We have always expected the Lummis Home were to consult Janice Raney and Dennis Harbach of Pat Adler-Ingram, Ph.D to be haunted by the spirit of Charles Lummis. He the Autry National Center we would simply have to bar Greg Fischer chose every stone, placed it in alignment, mixed every the door. They have identified about 3,000 signatures in Romualdo Valenzuela Julian van Zandweghe batch of concrete, hoisted every rafter, shaped every the guest book in the course of their project to digitize CONTRIBUTORS window and made every door. His remains are sealed and index the entire compilation using the original in the wall along with the ashes of his young son, book that now belongs to the Braun Library. The headquarters of the Historical Society of Amado. Of course he would stick around. They are very generously reporting their Southern California But I rather suspect there are hundreds of findings as they go forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 153 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2007 No. 142 House of Representatives The House met at 12:30 p.m. and was tion, and that’s despite fits and starts now seen is a health care clinic in called to order by the Speaker pro tem- with government health and so forth. Johnson Bayou, where the community pore (Ms. HIRONO). It’s the individuals, local officials, fam- came together to put this in place to f ilies on the ground that made the dif- create access for health care. ference. You know, we all talk about how all DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO This storm also caused unprece- politics is local, but I would submit TEMPORE dented damage to the oil and gas indus- that all health care is local. If we don’t The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- try. Again, individuals working in have access to health care, it doesn’t fore the House the following commu- those companies got our oil and gas in- matter. It doesn’t matter what’s avail- nication from the Speaker: frastructure back up and running in able in Boston, Massachusetts, or in record time, so that we could fuel San Francisco and New York, because WASHINGTON, DC, if the folks down in Johnson Bayou September 24, 2007. America’s energy needs. I hereby appoint the Honorable MAZIE K. At the Federal level, funds have been don’t have access to health care, then HIRONO to act as Speaker pro tempore on appropriated for assistance, but they what good is it? What good is the great this day.
    [Show full text]