DOCSLIB.ORG

Single European Act

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Single European Act Bulletin of the European Communities Supplement 2/86 Single European Act EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Commission This publication is also available in the following languages: ES ISBN 92-825-5966-1 DA ISBN 92-825-5962-9 DE ISBN 92-825-5963-7 GR ISBN 92-825-5964-5 FR ISBN 92-825-5967-X IT ISBN 92-825-5968-8 NL ISBN 92-825-5969-6 PT ISBN 92-825-5970-X Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1986 ISBN 92-825-5965-3 Catalogue number: CB-NF-86-002-EN-C Articles and texts appearing in this publication may be reproduced freely in whole or in part providing their source is mentioned. Printed in Belgium contents Title I Common provisions 7 Title II Provisions amending the Treaties establishing the Euro- pean Communities 8 Title III Provisions on European cooperation in the sphere of foreign policy 18 Title IV General and final provisions 20 Final Act 21 3-4 His Majesty the King of the Belgians, more effectively to protect its common interests and independence, in particular to display the principles Her Majesty the Queen of Denmark, of democracy and compliance with the law arid with The President of the Federal Republic of Germany, human rights to which they. are attached, so that together they may make their own contribution to The President of the Hellenic Republic, the preservation of international peace and security His Majesty the King of Spain, in accordance with the .. undertaking entere.d into by them within the framework of the United Nations The President of the French Republic, Charter, The President of Ireland, Determined to improve the economic and social The President of the Italian Republic, situation by extending common. policies and pur­ His Royal Highness the Grand DUke of Luxem­ suing new objectives, and to ensure a smoother bourg, functioning of the Communities by enabling the institutions to exercise their powers under condi­ Her Majesty the Queen of the Netherlands, tions most in keeping with Community interests, The. President of the Portuguese Republic, Whereas at their Conference in Paris from 19 to 21 Her MajestY the Queen of the United Kingdom of October 1972 the Heads of State or of Government Great Britain and Northern Ireland, approved the objective of the progressive realiza­ tionof economic and monetary union: Moved by the will to continue the work undertaken on the basis of the Treaties establishing the Euro­ Having regard to the Annex to the conclusions of pean Communities and to transform relations as a the Presidency of the European Council in Bremen whole among their States into a European Union, on 6 and 7 July 1978 and the Resolution of the in accordance with the Solemn Declaration of European Council in Brussels on 5 December 1978 Stuttgart of 19 June 1893. on the introduction of the European Monetary System (EMS) and related questions, and noting Resolved to implement this European Union on the that in accordance with that Resolution, the Com­ basis, firstly, of the Communities operating in munity and the Central Banks of the Member States accordance with their own rules and, secondly, of have taken a number of measures intended to European Cooperation among the Signatory States implement monetary cooperation, in the sphere of foreign policy and to invest this union with the necessary means of action, Have decided to adopt this Act and to this end have Determined to work together to promote demo­ designated as their plenipotentiaries: cracy on the basis of the fundamental rights rec­ ognized in the constitutions and laws of the Member States, in the Convention for the Protec­ tion of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms His Majesty the King of the Belgians, and the European Social Charter, notably freedom, equality and social justice, Mr Leo Tindemans, Minister for External Relations; Convinced that the European idea, the results Her Majesty the Queen of Denmark, achieved in the fields of economic integration and Mr Uffe Ellemann-Jensen, political cooperation, and the need for new deve­ Minister for Foreign Affairs; lopments correspond to the wishes of the demo­ cratic peoples of Europe, for whom the European The President of the Federal Republic of Germany, Parliament, elected by universal suffi'age, is an Mr Hans-Dietrich Genscher, indispensable means of expression, Federal Minister for Foreign Affairs; Aware of the responsibility incumbent upon Europe The President of the Hellenic Republic, to aim at speaking ever increasingly with one voice Mr Karoles Papou/ias, and to act with consistency and solidarity in order Minister for Foreign Affairs; S.2/86 s His Majesty the King of Spain, Her Majesty the Queen of the Netherlands, Mr Francisco Fernandez Ordonez. Mr Hans van den Broek, Minister for Foreign Affairs; Minister for Foreign Affairs; The President of the French Republic, The President of the Portuguese Republic, Mr Roland Dumas, Mr Pedro Pires de Miranda, Minister for External Relations; Minister for Foreign Affairs; The President of Ireland, Her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Mr Peter Barry, TD, Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Minister for Foreign Affairs; Mrs Lynda Chalker, Minister of State, Foreign and The President of the Italian· Republic, Commonwealth Office, Mr Giulio Andreotti, Minister for Foreign Affairs; His Royal Highness the Grand Duke of Luxembourg, Who, having exchanged their full powers, found in Mr Robert Goebbels, good and due fonn, have agreed as follows: State Secretary for Foreign Affairs; 6 s. 2/86 TITLE I Article 2 The European Council shall bring together the Heads of State or of Government of the Member Col1)mon provisions States and the President of the Commission of the European Communities. They shall be assisted by the Ministers for Foreign Affairs and by a Member Article I of the Commission. The European Communities and European Politi­ The European Council shall meet at least twice a cal Cooperation shall have as their objective to year. contribute together to malting concrete progress towards European unity. Article 3 The European Communities shall be founded on I. The institutions of the European Communities, the Treaties establishing the European Coal and henceforth designated as referred to hereafter, shall Steel Community, the European Economic Com­ exercise their powers and jurisdiction under the munity, the European Atomic Energy Community conditions and for the purposes provided for by the and on the subsequent Treaties and Acts modifYing Treaties establishing the Communities and by tile or supplementing them. subsequent Treaties and Acts modifYing or supple­ menting them and by the provisions ofTitle·u. Political Cooperation shall be governed by Title III. The provisions of the Title shall confirm and sup­ 2 The institutions and bodies responsible for plement the procedures agreed in the reports of European Political Cooperation shall exercise their Luxembourg ( 1970), Copenhagen (1973), Lon­ powers and jurisdiction under the conditions and don (1981), the Solemn Declaration on European for the purposes laid down in Title III and in the Union ( 1983) and the practices gradually establish­ documents referred to in the third paragraph of ed among the Member States. Article l. s. 2/86 7 TITLE II panially renewed every three years. Retiring mem­ bers shall be eligible for reappointment. Provisions amending 4. That coun shall establish its rules of procedure in agreement with the Court of Justice. Those rules the Treaties establishing shall require the unanimous approval of the Coun­ the European Communities cil.' Anicle 5 Chapter I Article 45 of the ECSC Treaty shall be supplemen­ ted by the following paragraph: Provisions amending the Treaty establishing the European Coal 'The Council may, acting unanimously at the request of the Court of Justice and after consulting the and Steel Community Commission and the European Parliament, amend the provisions of Title III of the Statute. ' · Anic/e 4 The ECSC Treaty shall be supplemented by the Chapter II following provisions: 'Anic/e 32d Provisions amending the Treaty 1. At the request of the Court of Justice and after establishing the European consulting the Commission and the European Par­ Economic Community liament, the Council may, acting unanimously, attach to the Coun ofJustice a court with jurisdiction to hear and determine at first instance, subject to a SECTION I right ofappeal to the Court ofJustice on points oflaw only and in accordance with the conditions laid down Institutional provisions by the Statute, certain classes ofaction or proceeding brought by natural or legal persons. That court shall Anic/e 6 not be competent to hear and determine actions brought by Member States or by Community insti­ 1. A cooperation procedure shall be introduced tutions or questions referred for a preliminary ruling which shall apply to acts based on Anicles 7, 49, under Article 41. 54(2), 56(2), second sentence, 57 with the exception of the second sentence ofparagraph 2 thereof, 100A. 2. The Council, following the procedure laid down 100 B, 118 A, 130 E and 130 Q(2) of the EEC in paragraph 1, shall determine the composition of Treaty. that court and adopt the necessary adjustments and additional provisions to the Statute of the Court of 2. In Article 7, second paragraph of the EEC Justice. Unless the Council decides otherwise, the Treaty the terms 'after consulting the Assembly' provisions of this Treaty relating to the Court of shall be replaced by 'in cooperation with the Euro­ Justice, in particular the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • European Parliament Resolution of 12 December 2013 on Constitutional Problems of a Multitier Governance in the European Union (2012/2078(INI)) (2016/C 468/25)
    C 468/176 EN Official Journal of the European Union 15.12.2016 Thursday 12 December 2013 P7_TA(2013)0598 Constitutional problems of a multitier governance in the EU European Parliament resolution of 12 December 2013 on constitutional problems of a multitier governance in the European Union (2012/2078(INI)) (2016/C 468/25) The European Parliament, — having regard to the Treaty on the European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, — having regard to the Treaty on the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) (1), — having regard to the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union (TSCG) (2), — having regard to the ‘six-pack’ (3), — having regard to the ‘two-pack’ (4), — having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (5), — having regard to its position of 12 September 2013 on the proposal for a Council regulation conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions (6), — having regard to the report of 5 December 2012 of the Presidents of the European Council, the European Commission, the European Central Bank and the Eurogroup entitled ‘Towards a genuine Economic and Monetary Union’ (7), — having regard to the Commission communication of 28 November 2012 entitled ‘A blueprint for a deep and genuine economic
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight Europe Reforming Economic and Monetary Union: Legislation and Treaty Change
    spotlight europe spotlight europe #2017/01 Reforming Economic and Monetary Union: Legislation and Treaty Change This paper examines the legal mechanisms for reforming EMU — EU legislation, amendments to intergovernmental treaties concluded outside EU law, and EU treaty changes. It provides guidance on how to introduce several needed changes to EMU, suggesting that many reforms can be accomplished à traité constant, but that improving the EU institutional system ultimately requires changing the EU treaties. to strengthen the Eurozone economy and its insti- Federico Fabbrini * tutional set-up. This effort acquires a new meaning since it coincides with the likely trigger that month by th e United Kingdom (UK) of negotiations to leave 1. Introduction the ­­EU. Brexit has already prompted soul-searching The reform of Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union wit­­h in the EU and created the need to think anew (EMU) remains on the agenda of the institutions about Europe’s strategic future. The purpose of this and the member states of the European Union (EU). paper is to contribute to this debate, by analyzing the Several high-level institutional reports on deepening legal wa ys and means to reform EMU — on the un- and completing EMU have been published in the last derstanding that the success of the European integra- few years, and the European Commission is expected tion project also depends on the successful resolution to deliver by March 2017 a white paper mapping how of the Euro-crisis and consolidation of EMU. * Full Professor of European Law, School of Law & Government, Dublin City University spotlight europe #2017/01 There are three legal avenues to reform EMU, complet- National leaders have also endorsed the goal of ing and deepening Europe’s architecture of economic stabilizing EMU.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union in Transition: the Treaty of Nice in Effect; Enlargement in Sight; a Constitution in Doubt
    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 27, Issue 2 2003 Article 1 The European Union in Transition: The Treaty of Nice in Effect; Enlargement in Sight; A Constitution in Doubt Roger J. Goebel∗ ∗ Copyright c 2003 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj The European Union in Transition: The Treaty of Nice in Effect; Enlargement in Sight; A Constitution in Doubt Roger J. Goebel Abstract This Article is intended to provide an overview of this transitional moment in the history of the European Union. Initially, the Article will briefly review the background of the Treaty of Nice, and the institutional structure modifications for which it provides, which paves the way for enlargement. Next it will describe the final stages of the enlargement process. Finally, the Article will set out the principal institutional innovations and certain other key aspects of the draft Constitution, the most important issues concerning them, and the current impasse. THE EUROPEAN UNION IN TRANSITION: THE TREATY OF NICE IN EFFECT; ENLARGEMENT IN SIGHT; A CONSTITUTION IN DOUBT Rogerj Goebel* INTRODUCTION Once again the European Union' (the "EU" or the "Union") is in a stage of radical evolution. Since the early 1990's, the EU has anticipated an extraordinary increase in its constituent Member States2 through the absorption of a large number of Central European and Mediterranean nations. Since the late 1990's, the Union has been negotiating the precise terms for their entry with a dozen applicant nations and has been providing cooperative assistance to them to prepare for their accession to the Union and in particular, its principal con- stituent part, the European Community.3 As this enlargement of the Union came more clearly in sight, the political leadership and the present Member States, joined by the Commission, con- * Professor and Director of the Center on European Union Law, Fordham Univer- sity School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Development of European Integration
    FACT SHEETS ON THE EUROPEAN UNION The historical development of European integration PE 618.969 1. The First Treaties.....................................................................................................3 2. Developments up to the Single European Act.........................................................6 3. The Maastricht and Amsterdam Treaties...............................................................10 4. The Treaty of Nice and the Convention on the Future of Europe..........................14 5. The Treaty of Lisbon..............................................................................................18 EN - 18/06/2018 ABOUT THE PUBLICATION This leaflet contains a compilation of Fact Sheets provided by Parliament’s Policy Departments and Economic Governance Support Unit on the relevant policy area. The Fact Sheets are updated regularly and published on the website of the European Parliament: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets ABOUT THE PUBLISHER Author of the publication: European Parliament Department responsible: Unit for Coordination of Editorial and Communication Activities E-mail: [email protected] Manuscript completed in June, 2018 © European Union, 2018 DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice
    [Show full text]
  • The European Parliament and Environmental Legislation: the Case of Chemicals
    European Journal of Political Research 36: 119–154, 1999. 119 © 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. The European Parliament and environmental legislation: The case of chemicals GEORGE TSEBELIS & ANASTASSIOS KALANDRAKIS University of California, Los Angeles, USA Abstract. The paper studies the impact of the EP on legislation on chemical pollutants in- troduced under the Cooperation procedure. A series of formal and informal analyses have predicted from significant impact of the EP, to limited impact (only in the second round) to no impact at all. Through the analysis of Parliamentary debates as well as Commission and Parliamentary committee documents, we are able to assess the significance of different amendments, as well as the degree to which they were introduced in the final decision of the Council. Our analysis indicates first that less than 30% of EP amendments are insignificant, while 15% are important or very important; second, that the probability of acceptance of an amendment is the same regardless of its significance. Further analysis indicates two sources of bias of aggregate EP statistics: several amendments are complementary (deal with the same issue in different places of the legal document), and a series of amendments that are rejected as inadmissible (because they violate the legal basis of the document or the germainess require- ment) are included in subsequent pieces of legislation. We calculate the effect of these biases in our sample, and find that official statistics underestimate Parliamentary influence by more than 6 percentage points (49% instead of 56% in our sample). Finally, we compare a series of observed strategic behaviors of different actors (rapporteurs, committees, floor, Commission) to different expectations generated by the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Guide Euroscepticism
    Information Guide Euroscepticism A guide to information sources on Euroscepticism, with hyperlinks to further sources of information within European Sources Online and on external websites Contents Introduction .................................................................................................. 2 Brief Historical Overview................................................................................. 2 Euro Crisis 2008 ............................................................................................ 3 European Elections 2014 ................................................................................ 5 Euroscepticism in Europe ................................................................................ 8 Eurosceptic organisations ......................................................................... 10 Eurosceptic thinktanks ............................................................................. 10 Transnational Eurosceptic parties and political groups .................................. 11 Eurocritical media ................................................................................... 12 EU Reaction ................................................................................................. 13 Information sources in the ESO database ........................................................ 14 Further information sources on the internet ..................................................... 14 Copyright © 2016 Cardiff EDC. All rights reserved. 1 Cardiff EDC is part of the University Library
    [Show full text]
  • Institutions, Policies and Enlargement of the European Union
    This booklet is published in all the ofiicial EU languages of the European Union: Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, ltalian, Portuguese, Spanish and Swedish. European Commission Directorate-General for Education and Culture Publications Unit, rue de la LoiAffetstraat 200, B-1049 Brussels A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2000 lsBN 92-828-8282-9 O European Communities, 2000 Reproduction is authonsed provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium Pnrrurro oN wHtrE cHLoRtNE-FREE pApER Foreword This publication is an update of the previous edition of 'Glossary: The reform of the European Union in 150 definitions' that was produced in 1997. As indicated by its original title, this glossary was produced in order to help people to gain a better understanding of the challenges facing the European Union at the time of the Intergovemmental Conference that opened in 1996. It was subsequently expanded to cover the fundamentals ofEuropean integration, the operation of the institutions, the policies of the Community and the contributions of the Amsterdam Treaty. The inclusion of the essential aspects of the enlargement process and of Agenda2}O} and, in the future, the results of the Intergovemmental Conference of 2000, confirms the glossary's vocation of follow- ing European current affairs and explaining them to the public. An update of the definitions contained in this publication is available on the SCADPIus site, which can be accessed on the Europa server at the following address : http ://europa.eu.infl scadplus/.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Parliament: Powers
    THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: POWERS Parliament asserts its institutional role in European policy-making by exercising its various functions. Parliament’s participation in the legislative process, its budgetary and control powers, its involvement in treaty revision and its right to intervene before the Court of Justice of the European Union enable it to uphold democratic principles at European level. LEGAL BASIS Articles 223 to 234 and 314 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). OBJECTIVES As an institution representing the citizens of Europe, Parliament forms the democratic basis of the European Union. If the EU is to have democratic legitimacy, Parliament must be fully involved in the EU’s legislative process and exercise political scrutiny over the other EU institutions on behalf of the public. CONSTITUTIONAL-TYPE POWERS AND RATIFICATION POWERS (1.2.4) Since the Single European Act (SEA)[1], all treaties marking the accession of a new Member State and all association treaties have been subject to Parliament’s assent. The SEA also established this procedure for international agreements with important budgetary implications for the Community (replacing the conciliation procedure established in 1975). The Maastricht Treaty introduced it for agreements establishing a specific institutional framework or entailing modifications to an act adopted under the codecision procedure. Parliament must also give its assent to acts relating to the electoral procedure (since the Maastricht Treaty). Since the Amsterdam Treaty, its assent has been required if the Council wants to declare that a clear danger exists of a Member State committing a serious breach of the EU’s fundamental principles, before addressing recommendations to or imposing penalties on that Member State.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Union Shall Respect Cultural Diversity and National Identities' Lisbon's Concessions to Euroscepticism – True Promi
    Student Paper ‘The Union shall respect cultural diversity and national identities’ Lisbon’s concessions to Euroscepticism – true promises or a booby-trap? Irene Aronstein* The Union shall respect the Member States’ cultural and linguistic diversity. – Article 3(3) Lisbon Treaty The Union shall respect (…) their national identity. – Article 4(2) Lisbon Treaty 1. Introduction The Lisbon Treaty states that the Union shall respect cultural diversity and national identity. Although the principles of subsidiarity and conferral are essential in the creation of powers for the Union, some of its institutions seem to express a progressive approach toward the develop- ment of a more centralised political entity, meaning that increasingly more powers would be exercised at the European Union level with less Member State sovereignty and autonomy. One of the first clear attempts to increase Union power was the rejected European Constitution, after which the Lisbon Treaty was created as a normal amendment treaty.1 However, divergent perspectives exist on the nature of the Lisbon Treaty: is it merely an amendment treaty or is it a step towards a ‘new Union’? And, more importantly, how does the Union combine these ideals with the statement that cultural diversity and national identity will be respected? *Irene Aronstein (LL.M.) participated in the Master’s Programme in Legal Research at the Utrecht University School of Law, Economics and Governance, Utrecht (the Netherlands). This contribution is part of a research project based on the 2009 International Legal Research Conference on ‘Euroscepticism and Multiculturalism’. Irene Aronstein was President of this 2009 Conference, to which this Special Issue is devoted.
    [Show full text]
  • European Union Research BOSTON COLLEGE LAW LIBRARY
    LEGAL RESEARCH GUIDE #9 European Union Research BOSTON COLLEGE LAW LIBRARY INTRODUCTION Post-World War II Europe The European Union has its origins in the period following the end of World War II in 1945. Faced with political and economic uncertainty, many nations in western Europe began to consider the possibilities of increased cooperation as a means of improving economic performance and providing increased security. The Organization for European Economic Cooperation was created in 1948 as a multinational agency to assist in the administration of the Marshall Plan for the reconstruction of western Europe. Further multinational cooperation was fostered by the Council of Europe, a consultative organization established in 1949 to promote common action in economic, social, cultural, scientific, legal and administrative matters. Beginnings of a Common Market The evolution of the European Union itself began in 1951 with the Treaty Establishing the European Coal and Steel Community (“ECSC”), 261 UNTS 140 (1951). This treaty provided a “common market” for the coal and steel industries of France, Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg, with regulations for pricing, transportation, competition, employment, and the abolition of subsidies. When the ECSC proved successful, attention focused on the creation of a “common market” for other sectors of the economy and for further economic integration. Ministers of the six ECSC countries negotiated and concluded two treaties, signed at Rome in March, 1957. The Treaty of Rome, 298 UNTS 11 (1957), established the European Economic Community and the EURATOM Treaty, 298 UNTS 167 (1957), created the European Atomic Energy Community. Both of these organizations officially came into existence on January 1, 1958.
    [Show full text]
  • Shifting EU Institutional Reform Into High Gear
    MEMBERS OF THE CEPS HIGH-LEVEL GROUP ON EU INSTITUTIONAL REFORM Danuta Hübner MEP, Chair Tom de Bruijn John Bruton Daniel Gros Malcolm Harbour MEP Karel Lannoo Eva Lichtenberger MEP Stefano Micossi Paolo Ponzano René Repasi Philippe de Schoutheete Gunther Verheugen RAPPORTEURS Sonia Piedra ta Steven Blockmans Shifting EU Institutional Reform into High Gear Centre for European Policy Studies 1 Place du Congrès 1000 Brussels, Belgium Tel : 32(0)2.229.39.11 Report of the CEPS High-Level Group Fax : 32(0)2.219.41.51 E-mail : [email protected] Website : www.ceps.eu CHAIR : Danuta Hübner SHIFTING EU INSTITUTIONAL REFORM INTO HIGH GEAR REPORT OF THE CEPS HIGH-LEVEL GROUP MEMBERS DANUTA HÜBNER MEP, CHAIR TOM DE BRUIJN JOHN BRUTON DANIEL GROS MALCOLM HARBOUR MEP KAREL LANNOO EVA LICHTENBERGER MEP STEFANO MICOSSI PAOLO PONZANO RENÉ REPASI PHILIPPE DE SCHOUTHEETE GÜNTER VERHEUGEN RAPPORTEURS SONIA PIEDRAFITA STEVEN BLOCKMANS CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN POLICY STUDIES BRUSSELS This report is based on discussions in the CEPS High-level Group on EU Institutional Reform. The group met four times between September and December 2013. Participants included MEPs, former members of the Commission and Commission officials, former members of COREPER and the Council and leading scholars on EU law and institutional affairs. A list of members and their organisational affiliation appears in the Annex. The contents of the report reflect the general tone and direction of the discussions, but its recommendations do not necessarily represent a full common position agreed by all members of the High-Level Group, nor do they necessarily represent the views of CEPS or the institutions to which the members belong.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 YEARS of EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT HISTORY and Subjugated
    European Parliament – 50th birthday QA-70-07-089-EN-C series 1958–2008 Th ere is hardly a political system in the modern world that does not have a parliamentary assembly in its institutional ‘toolkit’. Even autocratic or totalitarian BUILDING PARLIAMENT: systems have found a way of creating the illusion of popular expression, albeit tamed 50 YEARS OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT HISTORY and subjugated. Th e parliamentary institution is not in itself a suffi cient condition for granting a democratic licence. Yet the existence of a parliament is a necessary condition of what 1958–2008 we have defi ned since the English, American and French Revolutions as ‘democracy’. Since the start of European integration, the history of the European Parliament has fallen between these two extremes. Europe was not initially created with democracy in mind. Yet Europe today is realistic only if it espouses the canons of democracy. In other words, political realism in our era means building a new utopia, that of a supranational or post-national democracy, while for two centuries the DNA of democracy has been its realisation within the nation-state. Yves Mény President of the European University Institute, Florence BUILDING PARLIAMENT: BUILDING 50 YEARS OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT HISTORY PARLIAMENT EUROPEAN OF YEARS 50 ISBN 978-92-823-2368-7 European Parliament – 50th birthday series Price in Luxembourg (excluding VAT): EUR 25 BUILDING PARLIAMENT: 50 YEARS OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT HISTORY 1958–2008 This work was produced by the European University Institute, Florence, under the direction of Yves Mény, for the European Parliament. Contributors: Introduction, Jean-Marie Palayret; Part One, Luciano Bardi, Nabli Beligh, Cristina Sio Lopez and Olivier Costa (coordinator); Part Two, Pierre Roca, Ann Rasmussen and Paolo Ponzano (coordinator); Part Three, Florence Benoît-Rohmer; Conclusions, Yves Mény.
    [Show full text]