This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from the King’S Research Portal At

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from the King’S Research Portal At This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Dynamical supersymmetry enhancement of black hole horizons Kayani, Usman Tabassam Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 24. Apr. 2021 Dynamical supersymmetry enhancement of black hole horizons Usman Kayani A thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervised by: Dr. Jan Gutowski Department of Mathematics King's College London, UK November 2018 Abstract This thesis is devoted to the study of dynamical symmetry enhancement of black hole horizons in string theory. In particular, we consider supersymmetric horizons in the low energy limit of string theory known as supergravity and we prove the horizon conjecture for a number of supergravity theories. We first give important examples of symmetry enhancement in D = 4 and the mathematical preliminaries required for the analysis. Type IIA supergravity is the low energy limit of D = 10 IIA string theory, but also the dimensional reduction of D = 11 supergravity which itself the low energy limit of M-theory. We prove that Killing horizons in IIA supergravity with compact spatial sections preserve an even number of supersymmetries. By analyzing the global properties of the Killing spinors, we prove that the near-horizon geometries undergo a supersymmetry enhancement. This follows from a set of generalized Lichnerowicz-type theorems we establish, together with an index theory argument. We also show that the symmetry algebra of horizons with non-trivial fluxes includes an sl(2; R) subalgebra. As an intermediate step in the proof, we also demonstrate new Lichnerowicz type theorems for spin bundle connections whose holonomy is contained in a general linear group. We prove the same result for Roman's Massive IIA supergravity. We also consider the near-horizon geometry of supersymmetric extremal black holes in un-gauged and gauged 5-dimensional supergravity, coupled to abelian vector multiplets. We consider important examples in D = 5 such as the BMPV and supersymmetric black ring solution, and investigate the near-horizon geometry to show the enhancement of the symmetry algebra of the Killing vectors. We repeat a similar analysis as above to prove the horizon conjecture. We also investigate the conditions on the geometry of the spatial horizon section S. i Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to express my gratitude to Jan Gutowski for his guidance in my research, and for his patience and understanding. I would also like to thank my PhD mentor, Geoffrey Cantor, who has guided me through the trials and tribulations and Jean Alexandre for all his support in helping me cross the finish line. Finally, I would like to thank my family and friends, especially my parents, for all their support over the years and throughout my education and life. ii \Black holes provide theoreticians with an important theoretical laboratory to test ideas. Conditions within a black hole are so extreme, that by analyzing aspects of black holes we see space and time in an exotic environment, one that has shed important, and sometimes perplexing, new light on their fundamental nature." Brian Greene iii Table of Contents Abstract i Acknowledgements ii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Black holes........................................1 1.1.1 Other solutions: Reisser-Nordstr¨ommetric (1918)..............7 1.1.2 Kerr metric (1963)................................9 1.1.3 The Kerr-Newman geometry (1965)...................... 10 1.1.4 The no-hair theorem............................... 11 1.1.4.1 Higher dimensional black holes.................... 11 1.1.5 The laws of black hole mechanics and entropy................. 12 1.2 Symmetry in physics................................... 14 1.2.1 Noether's theorem................................ 15 1.2.2 Poincar´esymmetry................................ 16 1.3 Quantum gravity..................................... 16 1.3.1 Kaluza-Klein unification and compactification................. 18 1.3.2 Supersymmetry.................................. 19 1.3.3 Super-poincar´esymmetry............................ 20 1.3.4 Superstring theory................................ 21 1.3.4.1 The first superstring revolution.................... 23 1.3.4.2 The second superstring revolution.................. 23 1.4 Supergravity....................................... 25 1.4.1 D = 4;N = 8 supergravity............................ 28 1.4.2 D = 11;N = 1 supergravity........................... 29 1.5 Summary of Research.................................. 31 1.5.1 Plan of Thesis.................................. 35 1.6 Statement of Originality................................. 37 1.7 Publications........................................ 37 2 Killing Horizons and Near-Horizon Geometry 38 2.1 Killing horizons...................................... 38 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS v 2.2 Gaussian null coordinates................................ 40 2.2.1 Extremal horizons................................ 42 2.3 The near-horizon limit.................................. 43 2.3.1 Examples of near-horizon geometries...................... 45 2.3.2 Curvature of the near-horizon geometry.................... 48 2.3.3 The supercovariant derivative.......................... 49 2.4 Field strengths...................................... 50 2.5 The maximum principle................................. 51 2.6 The classical Lichnerowicz theorem........................... 51 3 Supergravity 54 3.1 D = 11 to IIA supergravity............................... 54 3.2 IIA to Roman's massive IIA............................... 58 3.3 D = 11 to D = 5;N = 2 supergravity.......................... 60 3.3.1 Ungauged..................................... 60 3.3.2 Gauged...................................... 64 4 D = 10 IIA Horizons 67 4.1 Horizon fields and KSEs................................. 67 4.1.1 Near-horizon fields................................ 67 4.1.2 Horizon Bianchi identities and field equations................. 68 4.1.3 Integration of KSEs along the lightcone.................... 70 4.1.4 Independent KSEs................................ 72 4.2 Supersymmetry enhancement.............................. 73 4.2.1 Horizon Dirac equations............................. 73 4.2.2 Lichnerowicz type theorems for D(±) ...................... 74 4.2.3 Index theory and supersymmetry enhancement................ 75 4.3 The sl(2; R) symmetry of IIA horizons......................... 76 4.3.1 Construction of η+ from η− Killing spinors.................. 76 4.3.2 Killing vectors.................................. 78 4.3.3 sl(2; R) symmetry of IIA-horizons........................ 79 4.4 The geometry and isometries of S ............................ 80 5 Roman's Massive IIA Supergravity 81 5.1 Horizon fields and KSEs................................. 81 5.1.1 Horizon Bianchi identities and field equations................. 81 5.1.2 Integration of KSEs along lightcone...................... 84 5.1.3 The independent KSEs on S .......................... 86 5.2 Supersymmetry enhancement.............................. 87 5.2.1 Horizon Dirac equations............................. 87 5.2.2 Lichnerowicz type theorems for D (±) ..................... 87 5.2.3 Index theory and supersymmetry enhancement................ 88 TABLE OF CONTENTS vi 5.3 The sl(2; R) symmetry of massive IIA horizons.................... 89 5.3.1 η+ from η− Killing spinors........................... 89 5.3.2 Killing vectors.................................. 90 5.3.3 sl(2; R) symmetry................................ 90 5.4 The geometry and isometries of S ............................ 91 6 D = 5 Supergravity Coupled to Vector Multiplets 92 6.1 Near-horizon geometry of the BMPV black holes and black rings.......... 93 6.2 Horizon fields and KSEs................................. 99 6.2.1 Near-horizon fields................................ 99 6.2.2 Horizon Bianchi indentities and field equations................ 100 6.2.3 Gauge field decomposition............................ 101 6.2.4 Integration of the KSEs along the lightcone.................. 103 6.2.5 The independent KSEs on S .......................... 105 6.3 Supersymmetry enhancement.............................. 106 6.3.1 Horizon Dirac equation............................. 106 6.3.2 Lichnerowicz type theorems for D (±) ...................... 107 6.3.3 Index theory and supersymmetry enhancement...............
Recommended publications
  • Particles-Versus-Strings.Pdf
    Particles vs. strings http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/vs.html In light of the huge amount of propaganda and confusion regarding string theory, it might be useful to consider the relative merits of the descriptions of the fundamental constituents of matter as particles or strings. (More-skeptical reviews can be found in my physics parodies.A more technical analysis can be found at "Warren Siegel's research".) Predictability The main problem in high energy theoretical physics today is predictions, especially for quantum gravity and confinement. An important part of predictability is calculability. There are various levels of calculations possible: 1. Existence: proofs of theorems, answers to yes/no questions 2. Qualitative: "hand-waving" results, answers to multiple choice questions 3. Order of magnitude: dimensional analysis arguments, 10? (but beware hidden numbers, like powers of 4π) 4. Constants: generally low-energy results, like ground-state energies 5. Functions: complete results, like scattering probabilities in terms of energy and angle Any but the last level eventually leads to rejection of the theory, although previous levels are acceptable at early stages, as long as progress is encouraging. It is easy to write down the most general theory consistent with special (and for gravity, general) relativity, quantum mechanics, and field theory, but it is too general: The spectrum of particles must be specified, and more coupling constants and varieties of interaction become available as energy increases. The solutions to this problem go by various names -- "unification", "renormalizability", "finiteness", "universality", etc. -- but they are all just different ways to realize the same goal of predictability.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.3 Self-Dual/Chiral Gauge Theories 23 1.3.1 PST Approach 27
    Durham E-Theses Chiral gauge theories and their applications Berman, David Simon How to cite: Berman, David Simon (1998) Chiral gauge theories and their applications, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/5041/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk Chiral gauge theories and their applications by David Simon Berman A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Mathematics University of Durham South Road Durham DHl 3LE England June 1998 The copyright of this tliesis rests with tlie author. No quotation from it should be published without the written consent of the author and information derived from it should be acknowledged. 3 0 SEP 1998 Preface This thesis summarises work done by the author between October 1994 and April 1998 at the Department of Mathematical Sciences of the University of Durham and at CERN theory division under the supervision of David FairUe.
    [Show full text]
  • STRING THEORY in the TWENTIETH CENTURY John H
    STRING THEORY IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY John H. Schwarz Strings 2016 { August 1, 2016 ABSTRACT String theory has been described as 21st century sci- ence, which was discovered in the 20th century. Most of you are too young to have experienced what happened. Therefore, I think it makes sense to summarize some of the highlights in this opening lecture. Since I only have 25 minutes, this cannot be a com- prehensive history. Important omitted topics include 2d CFT, string field theory, topological string theory, string phenomenology, and contributions to pure mathematics. Even so, I probably have too many slides. 1 1960 { 68: The analytic S matrix The goal was to construct the S matrix that describes hadronic scattering amplitudes by assuming • Unitarity and analyticity of the S matrix • Analyticity in angular momentum and Regge Pole The- ory • The bootstrap conjecture, which developed into Dual- ity (e.g., between s-channel and t-channel resonances) 2 The dual resonance model In 1968 Veneziano found an explicit realization of duality and Regge behavior in the narrow resonance approxima- tion: Γ(−α(s))Γ(−α(t)) A(s; t) = g2 ; Γ(−α(s) − α(t)) 0 α(s) = α(0) + α s: The motivation was phenomenological. Incredibly, this turned out to be a tree amplitude in a string theory! 3 Soon thereafter Virasoro proposed, as an alternative, g2 Γ(−α(s))Γ(−α(t))Γ(−α(u)) T = 2 2 2 ; −α(t)+α(u) −α(s)+α(u) −α(s)+α(t) Γ( 2 )Γ( 2 )Γ( 2 ) which has similar virtues.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth of String Theory
    THE BIRTH OF STRING THEORY String theory is currently the best candidate for a unified theory of all forces and all forms of matter in nature. As such, it has become a focal point for physical and philosophical dis- cussions. This unique book explores the history of the theory’s early stages of development, as told by its main protagonists. The book journeys from the first version of the theory (the so-called Dual Resonance Model) in the late 1960s, as an attempt to describe the physics of strong interactions outside the framework of quantum field theory, to its reinterpretation around the mid-1970s as a quantum theory of gravity unified with the other forces, and its successive developments up to the superstring revolution in 1984. Providing important background information to current debates on the theory, this book is essential reading for students and researchers in physics, as well as for historians and philosophers of science. andrea cappelli is a Director of Research at the Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Florence. His research in theoretical physics deals with exact solutions of quantum field theory in low dimensions and their application to condensed matter and statistical physics. elena castellani is an Associate Professor at the Department of Philosophy, Uni- versity of Florence. Her research work has focussed on such issues as symmetry, physical objects, reductionism and emergence, structuralism and realism. filippo colomo is a Researcher at the Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Florence. His research interests lie in integrable models in statistical mechanics and quantum field theory. paolo di vecchia is a Professor of Theoretical Physics at Nordita, Stockholm, and at the Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth of String Theory
    The Birth of String Theory Edited by Andrea Cappelli INFN, Florence Elena Castellani Department of Philosophy, University of Florence Filippo Colomo INFN, Florence Paolo Di Vecchia The Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen and Nordita, Stockholm Contents Contributors page vii Preface xi Contents of Editors' Chapters xiv Abbreviations and acronyms xviii Photographs of contributors xxi Part I Overview 1 1 Introduction and synopsis 3 2 Rise and fall of the hadronic string Gabriele Veneziano 19 3 Gravity, unification, and the superstring John H. Schwarz 41 4 Early string theory as a challenging case study for philo- sophers Elena Castellani 71 EARLY STRING THEORY 91 Part II The prehistory: the analytic S-matrix 93 5 Introduction to Part II 95 6 Particle theory in the Sixties: from current algebra to the Veneziano amplitude Marco Ademollo 115 7 The path to the Veneziano model Hector R. Rubinstein 134 iii iv Contents 8 Two-component duality and strings Peter G.O. Freund 141 9 Note on the prehistory of string theory Murray Gell-Mann 148 Part III The Dual Resonance Model 151 10 Introduction to Part III 153 11 From the S-matrix to string theory Paolo Di Vecchia 178 12 Reminiscence on the birth of string theory Joel A. Shapiro 204 13 Personal recollections Daniele Amati 219 14 Early string theory at Fermilab and Rutgers Louis Clavelli 221 15 Dual amplitudes in higher dimensions: a personal view Claud Lovelace 227 16 Personal recollections on dual models Renato Musto 232 17 Remembering the `supergroup' collaboration Francesco Nicodemi 239 18 The `3-Reggeon vertex' Stefano Sciuto 246 Part IV The string 251 19 Introduction to Part IV 253 20 From dual models to relativistic strings Peter Goddard 270 21 The first string theory: personal recollections Leonard Susskind 301 22 The string picture of the Veneziano model Holger B.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of String Theory
    THE FRONTIERS COLLECTION Dean Rickles A BRIEF HISTORY OF STRING THEORY From Dual Models to M-Theory 123 THE FRONTIERS COLLECTION Series editors Avshalom C. Elitzur Unit of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bar-Ilan University, 52900, Gières, France e-mail: [email protected] Laura Mersini-Houghton Department of Physics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3255 USA e-mail: [email protected] Maximilian Schlosshauer Department of Physics, University of Portland 5000 North Willamette Boulevard Portland, OR 97203, USA e-mail: [email protected] Mark P. Silverman Department of Physics, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 06106, USA e-mail: [email protected] Jack A. Tuszynski Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada e-mail: [email protected] Rüdiger Vaas Center for Philosophy and Foundations of Science, University of Giessen, 35394, Giessen, Germany e-mail: [email protected] H. Dieter Zeh Gaiberger Straße 38, 69151, Waldhilsbach, Germany e-mail: [email protected] For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/5342 THE FRONTIERS COLLECTION Series editors A. C. Elitzur L. Mersini-Houghton M. Schlosshauer M. P. Silverman J. A. Tuszynski R. Vaas H. D. Zeh The books in this collection are devoted to challenging and open problems at the forefront of modern science, including related philosophical debates. In contrast to typical research monographs, however, they strive to present their topics in a manner accessible also to scientifically literate non-specialists wishing to gain insight into the deeper implications and fascinating questions involved. Taken as a whole, the series reflects the need for a fundamental and interdisciplinary approach to modern science.
    [Show full text]
  • Exact Solutions and Black Hole Stability in Higher Dimensional Supergravity Theories
    Exact Solutions and Black Hole Stability in Higher Dimensional Supergravity Theories by Sean Michael Anton Stotyn A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2012 c Sean Michael Anton Stotyn 2012 ! I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. iii Abstract This thesis examines exact solutions to gauged and ungauged supergravity theories in space-time dimensions D 5 as well as various instabilities of such solutions. ≥ I begin by using two solution generating techniques for five dimensional minimal un- gauged supergravity, the first of which exploits the existence of a Killing spinor to gener- ate supersymmetric solutions, which are time-like fibrations over four dimensional hyper- K¨ahlerbase spaces. I use this technique to construct a supersymmetric solution with the Atiyah-Hitchin metric as the base space. This solution has three independent parameters and possesses mass, angular momentum, electric charge and magnetic charge. Via an anal- ysis of a congruence of null geodesics, I determine that the solution contains a region with naked closed time-like curves. The centre of the space-time is a conically singular pseudo- horizon that repels geodesics, otherwise known as a repulson. The region exterior to the closed time-like curves is outwardly geodesically complete and possesses an asymptotic region free of pathologies provided the angular momentum is chosen appropriately.
    [Show full text]
  • More Space for Unification Kaluza-Klein Theory and Extra Dimensions
    THESIS APPROVED BY g- lq -2-l 2^ø,-* 7. Ðrdl"- Date GintarasK. Duda, Ph.D. Physics Department Chair ll^*L^?.¿¿rut #nutnu,.P.Iürubel, Ph.D. Dave L. Sidebottom, Ph.D. KevinT. FitzGerald, S.J., Ph.D., Ph.D. Interim Dean, Graduate School More Space for Unification Kaluza-Klein Theory and Extra Dimensions By Joseph Nohea Kistner Submitted to the faculty of the Graduate School of Creighton University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Physics Omaha, NE August 13, 2021 Abstract The purpose of this this thesis is to investigate Kaluza-Klein theory, the history of extra dimensions, and provide a tool to those who want to learn about how they are being used today. In doing so, a re-derivation of the bulk of the theory was carried out because much of the original nomenclature and conventions are not common anymore, creating a barrier to those wanting to learn about it. The re-derivation includes Theodore Kaluza’s 1921 paper where he lays out the impetus for expanding the foundations of General Relativity to include an extra dimension of space, and one of Oskar Klein’s 1926 papers that answers the problem of the cylinder condition in Kaluza’s theory. Additional sections are provided to introduce tensor mathematics and Riemann Normal Coordinates, the coordinate system used throughout Kaluza’s derivation. The final chapter describes how extra dimensions are used in theories today and how experiments are being used to search for evidence of them. iii This is dedicated to my loving parents who have always encouraged me to pursue my happiness.
    [Show full text]
  • Dean Rickles a BRIEF HISTORY of STRING THEORY
    THE FRONTIERS COLLECTION Dean Rickles A BRIEF HISTORY OF STRING THEORY From Dual Models to M-Theory 123 THE FRONTIERS COLLECTION Series editors Avshalom C. Elitzur Unit of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bar-Ilan University, 52900, Gières, France e-mail: [email protected] Laura Mersini-Houghton Department of Physics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3255 USA e-mail: [email protected] Maximilian Schlosshauer Department of Physics, University of Portland 5000 North Willamette Boulevard Portland, OR 97203, USA e-mail: [email protected] Mark P. Silverman Department of Physics, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 06106, USA e-mail: [email protected] Jack A. Tuszynski Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada e-mail: [email protected] Rüdiger Vaas Center for Philosophy and Foundations of Science, University of Giessen, 35394, Giessen, Germany e-mail: [email protected] H. Dieter Zeh Gaiberger Straße 38, 69151, Waldhilsbach, Germany e-mail: [email protected] For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/5342 THE FRONTIERS COLLECTION Series editors A. C. Elitzur L. Mersini-Houghton M. Schlosshauer M. P. Silverman J. A. Tuszynski R. Vaas H. D. Zeh The books in this collection are devoted to challenging and open problems at the forefront of modern science, including related philosophical debates. In contrast to typical research monographs, however, they strive to present their topics in a manner accessible also to scientifically literate non-specialists wishing to gain insight into the deeper implications and fascinating questions involved. Taken as a whole, the series reflects the need for a fundamental and interdisciplinary approach to modern science.
    [Show full text]
  • QUIVER GAUGE THEORY and CONFORMALITY at the Tev
    Thank you for the invitation QUIVER GAUGE THEORY AND CONFORMALITY AT THE TeV SCALE Ten Years of AdS/CFT Buenos Aires December 20, 2007 Paul H. Frampton UNC-Chapel Hill OUTLINE 1. Quiver gauge theories. 2. Conformality phenomenology. 3. 4 TeV Unification. 4. Quadratic divergences. 5. Anomaly Cancellation - Conformal U(1)s 6. Dark Matter Candidate. SUMMARY. 2 CONCISE HISTORY OF STRING THEORY Began 1968 with Veneziano model. • 1968-1974 dual resonance models for strong • interactions. Replaced by QCD around 1973. DRM book 1974. Hiatus 1974-1984 1984 Cancellation of hexagon anomaly. • 1985 E(8) E(8) heterotic strong compacti- • fied on Calabi-Yau× manifold gives temporary optimism of TOE. 1985-1997 Discovery of branes, dualities, M • theory. 1997 Maldacena AdS/CFT correspondence • relating 10 dimensional superstring to 4 di- mensional gauge field theory. 1997-present Insights into gauge field theory • including possible new states beyond stan- dard model. String not only as quantum gravity but as powerful tool in nongravita- tional physics. 3 MORE ON STRING DUALITY: Duality: Quite different looking descriptions of the same underlying theory. The difference can be quite striking. For ex- ample, the AdS/CFT correspondence describes duality between a = 4, d = 4 SU(N) GFT and a D = 10 superstring.N Nevertheless, a few non-trivial checks have confirmed this duality. In its most popular version, one takes a Type IIB superstring (closed, chiral) in d = 10 and one compactifies on: (AdS) S5 5 × 4 Perturbative finiteness of = 4 SUSY Yang-Mills theory. N Was proved by Mandelstam, Nucl. Phys. • B213, 149 (1983); P.Howe and K.Stelle, ICL preprint (1983); Phys.Lett.
    [Show full text]
  • In Its Near 40-Year History, String Theory Has Gone from a Theory of Hadrons to a Theory of Everything To, Possibly, a Theory of Nothing
    physicsworld.com Feature: String theory Photolibrary Stringscape In its near 40-year history, string theory has gone from a theory of hadrons to a theory of everything to, possibly, a theory of nothing. Indeed, modern string theory is not even a theory of strings but one of higher-dimensional objects called branes. Matthew Chalmers attempts to disentangle the immense theoretical framework that is string theory, and reveals a world of mind-bending ideas, tangible successes and daunting challenges – most of which, perhaps surprisingly, are rooted in experimental data Problems such as how to cool a 27 km-circumference, philosophy or perhaps even theology. Matthew Chalmers 37 000 tonne ring of superconducting magnets to a tem- But not everybody believes that string theory is is Features Editor of perature of 1.9 K using truck-loads of liquid helium are physics pure and simple. Having enjoyed two decades Physics World not the kind of things that theoretical physicists nor- of being glowingly portrayed as an elegant “theory of mally get excited about. It might therefore come as a everything” that provides a quantum theory of gravity surprise to learn that string theorists – famous lately for and unifies the four forces of nature, string theory has their belief in a theory that allegedly has no connection taken a bit of a bashing in the last year or so. Most of this with reality – kicked off their main conference this year criticism can be traced to the publication of two books: – Strings07 – with an update on the latest progress The Trouble With Physics by Lee Smolin of the Perimeter being made at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at Institute in Canada and Not Even Wrong by Peter Woit CERN, which is due to switch on next May.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Unification in the Heterotic Brane World
    Grand Unification in the Heterotic Brane World Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades (Dr. rer. nat.) der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakult¨at der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universit¨at zu Bonn vorgelegt von Patrick Karl Simon Vaudrevange aus D¨usseldorf Bonn 2008 2 Angefertigt mit Genehmigung der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakult¨at der Universit¨atBonn. Referent: Prof. Dr. Hans-Peter Nilles Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Albrecht Klemm Tag der Promotion: 10. Juli 2008 Diese Dissertation ist auf dem Hochschulschriftenserver der ULB Bonn http://hss.ulb.uni-bonn.de/diss online elektronisch publiziert. Erscheinungsjahr: 2008 2 3 Abstract String theory is known to be one of the most promising candidates for a unified description of all elementary particles and their interactions. Starting from the ten-dimensional heterotic string, we study its compactification on six-dimensional orbifolds. We clarify some impor- tant technical aspects of their construction and introduce new parameters, called generalized discrete torsion. We identify intrinsic new relations between orbifolds with and without (gen- eralized) discrete torsion. Furthermore, we perform a systematic search for MSSM-like models in the context of 6-II orbifolds. Using local GUTs, which naturally appear in the heterotic brane world, we construct about 200 MSSM candidates. We find that intermediate SUSY breaking through hidden sector gaugino condensation is preferred in this set of models. A specific model, the so-called benchmark model, is analyzed in detail addressing questions like the identification of a supersymmetric vacuum with a naturally small µ-term and proton de- cay. Furthermore, as vevs of twisted fields correspond to a resolution of orbifold singularities, we analyze the resolution of 3 singularities in the local and in the compact case.
    [Show full text]