Decentralized Rural Infrastructure and Livelihoods Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Decentralized Rural Infrastructure and Livelihoods Project Environmental Assessment Report Summary Initial Environmental Examination Project Number: 30232 December 2007 NEP: Decentralized Rural Infrastructure and Livelihoods Project Prepared by [Author(s)] [Firm] [City, Country] Prepared by Department of Local Infrastructure Development and Agricultural Roads for the Asian Development Bank (ADB). Prepared for [Executing Agency] [Implementing Agency] TheThe summaryviews expressed initial environmental herein are those examination of the consul is atant document and do notof thenecessarily borrower. represent The views those expressed of ADB’s hereinmembers, do not Board necessarily of Director represens, Management,t those of orADB’s staff, Boardand may of Directors,be preliminary Management, in nature. or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (NEPALI)………………………………………………………..............3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 6 SALIENT FEATURES ................................................................................................................................ 9 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................. 10 1.1 BACKGROUND: ........................................................................................................................... 10 1.2 RELEVANCY OF THE PROPOSAL .................................................................................................. 10 1.3 NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE PROPONENT .................................................................................. 11 1.4 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: ....................................................................................................... 11 1.5 CONSTRUCTION APPROACH ....................................................................................................... 12 1.6 OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................... 12 1.7 METHODOLOGY ADOPTED FOR IEE STUDY: ............................................................................... 12 2. REVIEW OF RELEVANT ACTS, REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES ................................ 16 3. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION ........................................................................... 19 3.1 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT .......................................................................................................... 19 3.2 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT ...................................................................................................... 25 3.3 SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT .................................................................... 27 4. PROJECT ALTERNATIVES: ........................................................................................................ 32 4.1 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES: ........................................................................................................... 32 4.2 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE: ................................................................................................................ 32 4.3 ALTERNATIVE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION APPROACH: ............................................................ 32 4.4 ALTERNATIVE SCHEDULE & PROCESS: ...................................................................................... 33 4.5 ALTERNATIVE RESOURCES: ....................................................................................................... 33 4.6 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVES: ....................................................................................................... 33 5. IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS ............................................................ 34 5.1 BENEFICIAL IMPACTS ................................................................................................................. 34 5.2 ADVERSE IMPACTS ..................................................................................................................... 36 6. MITIGATION MEASURES ............................................................................................................ 40 6.1 BENEFIT AUGMENTATION MEASURES ........................................................................................ 40 6.2 ADVERSE IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES .............................................................................. 41 7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ......................................................................... 46 7.1 INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR ROLES ............................................................................................... 46 7.2 REPORTING AND DOCUMENTATION ............................................................................................ 47 7.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN .................................................................................... 48 7.4 MITIGATION COST ...................................................................................................................... 51 7.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF MITIGATION MEASURES .......................................................................... 52 7.6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ................................................................................................. 52 8.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................... 57 8.1 CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................................. 57 8.2 RECOMMENDATION .................................................................................................................... 57 9. MISCELLANEOUS ......................................................................................................................... 58 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. 1 Project Activities Of The Proposed Dunai - Triveni Road ......................................................... 11 Table 3.1: Types Of Soil Recorded By Survey Team During Field Study ................................................... 20 Table 3.2: Rivers And Kholsi In The Alignment ......................................................................................... 21 Table 3.3 List Of Plant Species Recorded During The Field Survey ......................................................... 26 Table 3.4: Non Timber Forest Product Found In The Road Alignment And Project Area ......................... 26 Table 3.5: Local & Scientific Name Of Some Mammals Found In Project Area........................................ 27 Table 3.6: Local & Scientific Name Of Some Birds Found In Project Area. .............................................. 27 Table 3.7 Population And Households Within Zoi ..................................................................................... 27 Table 3.8: Demographic Information Of The Settlements Within Zoi ........................................................ 28 Table 3.9: Settlement Of The Project Area ................................................................................................. 28 Table 3.10:The Alignment Access To School &Campus ............................................................................. 29 Table 3.11:Health Facility Found Inproject Area ......................................................................................... 29 Table 3.12:Community Organisation And Service Centres Within Zoi ....................................................... 30 Table 3.13:Religious And Cultural Sites Within Zoi ................................................................................... 31 Table 5.1: Evaluation Of Identified Environmental Impacts ....................................................................... 38 Table 7.1 Framework Of Implementing Environmental Management Plan ............................................... 48 Table 7.2. Cost Estimate For Environmental Enhancement And Mitigation Measures .............................. 51 Table 7.3 Environmental Monitoring Cost ................................................................................................. 53 Table 7.4 Framework For Monitoring Environmental Issues ..................................................................... 55 LIST OF FIGURE Figure 7.1 Environmental Management Organization Structure .................................................................. 48 ANNEXES Annex I Terms of Reference for IEE study Annex II Summary of the Consultations & Meetings Annex III Deed of enquiry (muchulka) Annex IV Notices Published & Pasted Annex V Recommendation letters from the concerned VDCs or Municipality Annex VI Photographs, Drawings, Checklists, Questionnaires , Maps etc. Map-1 : Map of Nepal showing sub project district Map-2 : Map of Dolpa district showing Sub project Map-3 : Engineering Geological map of Dunai - Triveni Road sub project Map-4 : Structural map of Dunai - Triveni Road sub project Annex VII List of Persons and institutions consulted. Annex VIII Abstract of cost ABBREVIATIONS ADB Asian Development Bank BG Building Group CDO Chief District Officer Ch Chainage CBO Community Based Organization CEA Country Environmental Analysis CFUG Community Forest Users Group CISC Central Implementation Support Consultants CF Community Forest CITES Convention
Recommended publications
  • Code Under Name Girls Boys Total Girls Boys Total 010290001
    P|D|LL|S G8 G10 Code Under Name Girls Boys Total Girls Boys Total 010290001 Maiwakhola Gaunpalika Patidanda Ma Vi 15 22 37 25 17 42 010360002 Meringden Gaunpalika Singha Devi Adharbhut Vidyalaya 8 2 10 0 0 0 010370001 Mikwakhola Gaunpalika Sanwa Ma V 27 26 53 50 19 69 010160009 Phaktanglung Rural Municipality Saraswati Chyaribook Ma V 28 10 38 33 22 55 010060001 Phungling Nagarpalika Siddhakali Ma V 11 14 25 23 8 31 010320004 Phungling Nagarpalika Bhanu Jana Ma V 88 77 165 120 130 250 010320012 Phungling Nagarpalika Birendra Ma V 19 18 37 18 30 48 010020003 Sidingba Gaunpalika Angepa Adharbhut Vidyalaya 5 6 11 0 0 0 030410009 Deumai Nagarpalika Janta Adharbhut Vidyalaya 19 13 32 0 0 0 030100003 Phakphokthum Gaunpalika Janaki Ma V 13 5 18 23 9 32 030230002 Phakphokthum Gaunpalika Singhadevi Adharbhut Vidyalaya 7 7 14 0 0 0 030230004 Phakphokthum Gaunpalika Jalpa Ma V 17 25 42 25 23 48 030330008 Phakphokthum Gaunpalika Khambang Ma V 5 4 9 1 2 3 030030001 Ilam Municipality Amar Secondary School 26 14 40 62 48 110 030030005 Ilam Municipality Barbote Basic School 9 9 18 0 0 0 030030011 Ilam Municipality Shree Saptamai Gurukul Sanskrit Vidyashram Secondary School 0 17 17 1 12 13 030130001 Ilam Municipality Purna Smarak Secondary School 16 15 31 22 20 42 030150001 Ilam Municipality Adarsha Secondary School 50 60 110 57 41 98 030460003 Ilam Municipality Bal Kanya Ma V 30 20 50 23 17 40 030460006 Ilam Municipality Maheshwor Adharbhut Vidyalaya 12 15 27 0 0 0 030070014 Mai Nagarpalika Kankai Ma V 50 44 94 99 67 166 030190004 Maijogmai Gaunpalika
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study of Kailash Sacred Landscape
    Kailash Sacred Landscape Conservation Initiative Feasability Assessment Report - Nepal Central Department of Botany Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Nepal June 2010 Contributors, Advisors, Consultants Core group contributors • Chaudhary, Ram P., Professor, Central Department of Botany, Tribhuvan University; National Coordinator, KSLCI-Nepal • Shrestha, Krishna K., Head, Central Department of Botany • Jha, Pramod K., Professor, Central Department of Botany • Bhatta, Kuber P., Consultant, Kailash Sacred Landscape Project, Nepal Contributors • Acharya, M., Department of Forest, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation (MFSC) • Bajracharya, B., International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) • Basnet, G., Independent Consultant, Environmental Anthropologist • Basnet, T., Tribhuvan University • Belbase, N., Legal expert • Bhatta, S., Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation • Bhusal, Y. R. Secretary, Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Das, A. N., Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Ghimire, S. K., Tribhuvan University • Joshi, S. P., Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Khanal, S., Independent Contributor • Maharjan, R., Department of Forest • Paudel, K. C., Department of Plant Resources • Rajbhandari, K.R., Expert, Plant Biodiversity • Rimal, S., Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Sah, R.N., Department of Forest • Sharma, K., Department of Hydrology • Shrestha, S. M., Department of Forest • Siwakoti, M., Tribhuvan University • Upadhyaya, M.P., National Agricultural Research Council
    [Show full text]
  • Forests and Watershed Profile of Local Level (744) Structure of Nepal
    Forests and Watershed Profile of Local Level (744) Structure of Nepal Volumes: Volume I : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 1 Volume II : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 2 Volume III : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 3 Volume IV : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 4 Volume V : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 5 Volume VI : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 6 Volume VII : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 7 Government of Nepal Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation Department of Forest Research and Survey Kathmandu July 2017 © Department of Forest Research and Survey, 2017 Any reproduction of this publication in full or in part should mention the title and credit DFRS. Citation: DFRS, 2017. Forests and Watershed Profile of Local Level (744) Structure of Nepal. Department of Forest Research and Survey (DFRS). Kathmandu, Nepal Prepared by: Coordinator : Dr. Deepak Kumar Kharal, DG, DFRS Member : Dr. Prem Poudel, Under-secretary, DSCWM Member : Rabindra Maharjan, Under-secretary, DoF Member : Shiva Khanal, Under-secretary, DFRS Member : Raj Kumar Rimal, AFO, DoF Member Secretary : Amul Kumar Acharya, ARO, DFRS Published by: Department of Forest Research and Survey P. O. Box 3339, Babarmahal Kathmandu, Nepal Tel: 977-1-4233510 Fax: 977-1-4220159 Email: [email protected] Web: www.dfrs.gov.np Cover map: Front cover: Map of Forest Cover of Nepal FOREWORD Forest of Nepal has been a long standing key natural resource supporting nation's economy in many ways. Forests resources have significant contribution to ecosystem balance and livelihood of large portion of population in Nepal. Sustainable management of forest resources is essential to support overall development goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Bon Sanctuary Trek - 35 Days
    PO Box No.: 2721 Samakhusi-29, Kathmandu, Nepal Contact No.: +977-9851133894 Email: [email protected] www.himalayancompanion.com Bon Sanctuary Trek - 35 Days Dolpo is land of Bon, it is locating on the remote and rugged corner of West-Nepal has retained ancient bon culture and tradition still preserved. Dolpo Bon Sanctuary Trek is one of the great experience trek for those who are very keen to know about the Bon religion, how it has intimate connection with Bayul hidden sangrila Dolpo. During this trek you will have an opportunity to visit some very old and some recent Bon monasteries. The entire trip include ten big monasteries which is core focus of this journey and in addition many other old buddhist monasteries with amazing and breath taking hidden landscape, Khas culture, Bhotiya(Dolpopa) culture and wild animals. The major Bon Gonpas that we explore and visit in this trek are; Samling monastery in Vijer, Yungdrung Shugtsal in Barlie, Phuntsokling in Dho Tarap, Yangon Thongroling in Chharka, Thasung Tsoling in Rigmo, Thekchen Rabdiling in Pugmo, Tsallung Sidgyalgon in Karelikanda, Monri Zursum in Khaliban, Yungdrung Dodulling in Kaigaon and Dolpo Yungdrung Bon Tsokling in Dunai. Bon Santuary trek, starts from Juphal and all the way to Dunai, Tichurong, Barbung & Chharka to Dho Tarap then to Saldng to Bhijer, and to Shey Gompa, Phoksundo, Pugmo, Kag valley (Kaaigaon & Hurikot) and ends to Juphal. PO Box No.: 2721 Samakhusi-29, Kathmandu, Nepal Contact No.: +977-9851133894 Email: [email protected] www.himalayancompanion.com PRICE INCLUDES Airport pickup and drop. 3 Nights Hotel Accommodations in Kathmandu.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on the Most Traded Medicinal Plants from the Dolpa District of Nepal
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Toyama Repository STUDIES ON THE MOST TRADED MEDICINAL PLANTS FROM THE DOLPA DISTRICT OF NEPAL Mohan B. Gewali Division of Visiting Professors Institute of Natural Medicine University of Toyama Abstract The traditional uses, major chemical constituents and prominent biological activities of the most traded medicinal plants from Dolpa district of Nepal are described in this article. Cradled on the laps of the central Himalayan range, Nepal (147,181 Km2) is sandwiched between two Asian giants, India on the South and China on the North. Nepal is divided into 14 zones and 75 districts. The Karnali zone, which has a border with Tibet region of China, is made up of five districts. Dolpa district (7,889 km²) is one of them. Dolpa district’s topography starts from the subtropical region (1575 meter) and ends in the nival region (6883 meter) in the trans-Himalayan region. The district has a population of about 29545 with Hindu 60%, Buddhist 40% including 5.5% ancient Bonpo Religion. Major ethnic groups/castes belonging to both Hindu and Buddhist religions include Kshetri, Dangi, Rokaya, Shahi, Buda, Thakuri, Thakulla, Brahmins, Karki, Shrestha, Sherpa and other people of Tibetan origin. The languages spoken are Nepali, Dolpo and Kaike. Dolpo is a variant of the Tibetan language. Kaike is considered indigenous language of Tichurong valley. In the Dolpa district, the traditional Tibetan medical practices are common. The traditional Tibetan practitioners called the Amchis provide the health care service. The Amchis have profound knowledge about the medicinal herbs and the associated healing properties of the medicinal plants found in the Dolpa district.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Climate Change Support Programme
    Final Evaluation Report Laxmi Dutt Bhatta and Dr Shalu Adhikari LAXMI DUTT BHATTA SHALU ADHIKARI, PHD Commissioned by United Nations Development Programme, Nepal Submitted to United Nations Development Programme, Nepal Nepal Climate Change Support Programme Final Evaluation Report 2019 December, 2019 Acknowledgments The evaluation team appreciate and acknowledge the support received from many individuals and institutions for their contribution through time, innovative ideas, information, suggestions and assistance. We are very grateful to Ministry of Forests and Environment (MoFE) /Government of Nepal and DFID Nepal. We appreciate all support received from Dr Bishwa Nath Oli, Dr Sindhu Dhungana, Dr Maheswar Dhakal, Dr Arun P. Bhatta from the Ministry of Forests and Environment and Dr Ram Prasad Lamsal from the Department of Forests and Soil Conservation. We are very grateful to the UNDP Nepal for their support, time and openness during the evaluation process. We sincerely thank Mr Vijaya Singh, Mr Vijay Prasad Kesari, and Mr Dinesh Bista, from UNDP Nepal. Our sincere appreciation to the members of Nepal Climate Change Support Programme (NCCSP), including Mr Anil KC, Mr Manoj Ojha, Ms Rojy Joshi, Ms Shazia Thapa and Mr Hari Narayan Kurmi for their timely support making all documents available, and also logistics for field visits. NCCSP field staff from Dolpa, Mr Shankar Tamata, Bajura, Ms Srijana Regmi and Dang, Ms Deepa Bista for their support and openness during discussions are highly appreciated. Mr Simon Lucas from DFID also deserves our appreciation for his critical feedback during the process. We sincerely appreciate and thank Mayors, deputy Mayors and ward Chairpersons of different Palikas.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Five High Passes
    Five High Passes - Dolpo to Mustang Trek, Nepal An epic Himalayan trek crossing a region little changed by time; towering peaks, ancient villages and five of Nepal's finest 5,000m passes. Group departures See overleaf for departure dates Holiday overview Style Trek Accommodation Hotels, Camping Grade Strenuous Duration 23 days from London to London Trekking / Walking days On trek: 16 days Min/Max group size 5 / 12. Guaranteed to run for 5 Mountain Kingdoms Leader 2021 – John Turner Trip Leader Mountain Kingdoms Leader 2022 - TBC Land only Joining in Kathmandu, Nepal Max altitude 5,700m/18,700ft, Ghami La, Day 17 Private Departures & Tailor Made itineraries available tel: +44 (0)1453 844400 fax: +44 (0)1453 844422 [email protected] www.mountainkingdoms.com Mountain Kingdoms Ltd, 20 Long Street, Wotton-under-Edge, Gloucestershire GL12 7BT UK Managing Director: Steven Berry. Registered in England No. 2118433. VAT No. 496 6511 08 Last updated: 25 May 2021 Departures 2021 Dates: Sat 18 Sep – Sun 10 Oct 2022 Dates: Sat 30 Apr – Sun 22 May Sat 17 Sep – Sun 09 Oct 2023 Dates: Sat 29 Apr – Sun 21 May Sat 16 Sep – Sun 08 Oct Will the trip run? This trip is guaranteed to run for 5 people and for a maximum of 12. In the rare event that we cancel a holiday, we will refund you in full and give you at least 6 weeks warning. Many trips do fill up quickly – we advise you to book early if you want to secure a place(s) on the dates of your choice.
    [Show full text]
  • RAMS) + Performance-Based Contracting (PBC)
    Road Asset Management Systems (RAMS) + Performance-Based Contracting (PBC) Session 1.1: RAMS Introduction Serge Cartier van Dissel February 2021 Agenda Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Road Asset Management System Road Asset Management System Performance Based Contracting (RAMS) (RAMS) (PBC) Session 1.1 Session 2.1 Session 3.1 RAMS RAMS Data Management PBC Introduction & Introduction & Data Analysis Performance Standards Break Break Break Session 1.2 Session 2.2 Session 3.2 RAMS RAMS PBC Inspections & Data Collection Integration Payments Road Asset Management System Any system that is used to collect, manage and analyse road data for road planning and programming purposes Function of a RAMS: Optimizing the level and the allocation of road funding in relation to medium- and long-term results regarding road conditions and road user costs • Define the road network maintenance, rehabilitation and upgrading needs • Based on condition data • Determine the required budget to address those needs • Determine how the available budget is best allocated • To different roads and networks (class, traffic, etc.) • To different treatment types (routine, periodic, rehabilitation, upgrading) • Based on agreed prioritization criteria • Economic (e.g. road user costs, traffic levels) • Social (e.g. population, minimum access) • Predict the impact of that budget allocation • Future road network conditions • Future maintenance and rehabilitation costs • Monitor the road network over time Road Asset Management System • Data collection • Road data (inventory, condition, traffic,
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Suitability Map of Coffea Arabica In: Doramba, RAMECHHAP 85°50'E 85°55'E 86°0'E
    Habitat suitability map of Coffea arabica in: Doramba, RAMECHHAP 85°50'E 85°55'E 86°0'E Lisangkhu Pakhar Legend Gaunpalika Roads KABHREPALANCHOK National Highway Feeder Road Chaurideurali Sailung District Road Gaunpalika Gaunpalika DOLAKHA District Boundary Palikas N ' 5 3 Suitability Index ° 7 2 Moderately Suitable (MS) - 1393 Hectares Suitable (S) - 899 Hectares Melung Highly Suitable (HS) - 26 Hectares Doramba Gaunpalika Gaunpalika RAMECHHAP ² 0 1 2 4 N ' 0 km 3 ° Multi-criteria analysis and elevation, 7 2 Sunapati aspect, slope, landuse, average Gaunpalika annual precipitation and temperature datasets were used in this study to identify suitable areas for coffee Khadadevi cultivation. Gaunpalika May, 2018 Habitat suitability map of Coffea arabica in: Gokulganga, RAMECHHAP 86°10'E 86°15'E 86°20'E 86°25'E Legend Kalinchok Gaunpalika Roads Gaurishankar National Highway Gaunpalika Feeder Road District Road N ' 0 4 District Boundary ° 7 2 Palikas Jiri Nagarpalika Suitability Index Moderately Suitable (MS) Baiteshwor DOLAKHA - 790 Hectares Gaunpalika Suitable (S) - 39 Hectares N ' Highly Suitable (HS) 5 3 - 51 Hectares ° 7 2 SOLUKHUMBU Tamakoshi Gokulganga RAMECHHAP Likhupike Gaunpalika Gaunpalika ² Gaunpalika 0 1.75 3.5 7 km N Multi-criteria analysis and elevation, ' 0 Umakunda aspect, slope, landuse, average 3 ° Gaunpalika 7 annual precipitation and temperature 2 datasets were used in this study to Khijidemba identify suitable areas for coffee Likhu Gaunpalika cultivation. Gaunpalika May, 2018 OKHALDHUNGA Habitat suitability map of Coffea
    [Show full text]
  • Gateway to Eastern Nepal
    A H D First Flight D Experience U B YEARS Issue # 38 November 2019 www.buddhaair.com BIRATNAGARGateway to Eastern Nepal 89 days in the ;'Gb/ >]i7 Jhumke Himalayas g]kfnL gf]6sf Topi l8hfOg/ Waste to Wonderful facebook.com/ buddhaair @airbuddha @buddhaairnepal www.buddhaair.com YEARS Taking Off To 22 Years of Trusted Flying Becoming Nepal's longest operating private domestic airlines would not be possible without you. We would like to take this opportunity to thank our valued passengers, employees, business partners and well wishers. MAKING AIR TRANSPORT AN PROVIDING EMPLOYMENT TO NEPALIS AFFORDABLE REALITY From flying the skies to maintaining the We have invested in technology to make our aircrafts, every journey of your flight is taken services highly efficient, which enable us to care of by our dedicated and trained Nepali reduce airfares. Over 1,526,206 passengers employees. chose to fly with us, out of the total 2,864,759 passengers in the domestic sector this year. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY HELPING FARMERS OF MORANG &SUNSARI ENSURING SAFE FLIGHTS Through our CSR, we have been working to We operate one of the best hangar facility improve paddy yields through mechanization in South Asia. Our hangar includes more and reduce the dependence on imports. infrastructures than other Nepali airlines, Since we started, farmers have shown a lot ensuring every Buddha Air flight to be safe. of enthusiasm on reaping high profits at low investments. Buddha Air BuddhaAir AirBuddha BuddhaAirNepal BuddhaAirPvtLtd Namaste and welcome on board Buddha Air! 11th October will always be a monumental date areas of Nepal and provide even more convenience to for Buddha Air.
    [Show full text]
  • Dolpa Juphal Airport
    DOLPA JUPHAL AIRPORT Brief Description Dolpa (Juphal) Airport is situated at Juphal Municipality of Dolpa District, Karnali Province. The airport serves as the gate way to Shey- Phoksundo National Park where the Phoksundo Lake is the major attraction. The airport also serves for the means of connection to upper Dolpa Trek which is one of the famous destinations for tourists. General Information Name DOLPA Location Indicator VNDP IATA Code DOP Aerodrome Reference Code 1B Aerodrome Reference Point 285909 N/0824909 E Province/District Karnali/Dolpa Distance and Direction from City Three hours walking Distance from District Headquater( Dunai) Elevation 2503 m. /8212 ft. Off: 977-87690429 Tower: 977-87690429 Contact AFS: VNDPYDYX E-mail: [email protected] 16th Feb to 15th Nov 0600LT-1215LT Operation Hours 16th Nov to 15th Feb 0630LT-1215LT Status Operational Year of Start of Operation 1975 Serviceability All Weather Land Approx. 59659.09 m2 Re-fueling Facility Not Available Service AFIS Type of Traffic Permitted Visual Flight Rule (VFR) Type of Aircraft DHC6, L410, Y12 Schedule Operating Airlines Tara Air, Sita Air, Nepal Airlines, Summit Air Schedule Connectivity Nepalgunj, Surkhet RFF Not Available Infrastructure Condition Airside Runway Type of Surface Bituminous Paved (Asphalt Concrete) Runway Dimension 560 m x 20 m Runway Designation 16/34 Parking Capacity Two DHC6 Types Size of Apron 2400 sq.m. Apron Type Asphalt Concrete Airport Facilities Console One Man Position Tower Console with Associated Equipment and Accessories Communication,
    [Show full text]