DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Manitoba Budget Framework

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Manitoba Budget Framework UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA BUDGET FRAMEWORK Release February 2018 UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA BUDGET FRAMEWORK TABLE OF CONTENTS Important Note to Readers ....................................................................................................................................................4 I. University of Manitoba — Quick Facts..........................................................................................................................5 II. Setting the Stage — University Finances.....................................................................................................................6 III. Integrated Planning at the University of Manitoba............................................................................................... 10 A. Strategic Plan ......................................................................................................................................................... 10 B. Research Plan ......................................................................................................................................................... 13 C. International Strategy ......................................................................................................................................... 14 D. Strategic Enrolment Management ................................................................................................................. 16 E. Major Capital Planning ....................................................................................................................................... 17 F. Campus and Space Planning ............................................................................................................................ 18 G. Environmental Sustainability Strategy ......................................................................................................... 19 H. IT Planning .............................................................................................................................................................. 20 I. Campaign Plan ...................................................................................................................................................... 20 J. Unit Level Plans ..................................................................................................................................................... 22 IV. Developing the Budget ................................................................................................................................................... 23 A. Planning Context .................................................................................................................................................. 23 B. Budget and Planning Process Timelines ...................................................................................................... 24 C. Estimates.................................................................................................................................................................. 25 D. Resource Planning................................................................................................................................................ 25 E. Budget Development ......................................................................................................................................... 26 F. Budget Monitoring .............................................................................................................................................. 27 G. 2017/18 Operating Budget ............................................................................................................................... 27 V. Additional Financial Information ................................................................................................................................. 28 A. Fund Categories and Inter-Fund Transfers .................................................................................................. 28 B. Inter-Fund Transfers ............................................................................................................................................. 28 C. General Funds ........................................................................................................................................................ 28 D. Restricted Funds ................................................................................................................................................... 32 VI. Appendixes 1. Critical Infrastructure Renewal Projects 2018/19 ...................................................................................... 37 2. Budget Advisory Committee Membership List ......................................................................................... 38 3. Operating Fund Revenue: 2013 to 2017 ...................................................................................................... 39 4. Operating Fund Expenditure: 2013 to 2017 ............................................................................................... 40 5. A) General Operating Fund Revenues and Expenses: 5 Year Detail Statement ............................. 41 B) Inter-Fund Detail: 5 Year Detail Statement ............................................................................................. 42 6. Comparison of General Operating Expenditures by Function by U15 Universities ..................... 43 7. Operating Income per Enrolment by Province: 2015/16 ....................................................................... 44 8. Change in Provincial Government Funding per Student Enrolment: 2005/06 to 2015/16 ............................................................................................................................................. 45 9. Average Undergraduate University Tuition by Province: 2001/02 to 2017/18 ............................... 46 10. Average Undergraduate Tuition Fee Increases: 2001/02 to 2016/17 ................................................. 47 11. Net Expenditures per FFTE Student by Faculty: 2012/13 to 2016/17 ................................................ 48 12. Net Expenditures per FFTE Student by Faculty: Indexed to 2012/13 ................................................ 49 13. Carryover by Major Function: 2013 to 2017 ................................................................................................ 50 14. Carryover Allocation Funding Category: 2 Year Summary .................................................................... 51 15. Change in Research Fund Revenue: 2013 to 2017 ................................................................................... 54 16. Research Fund Expenses by Purpose: 2013 to 2017 ................................................................................ 55 17. Research Expenses by Faculty: 2016/17 ....................................................................................................... 56 18. Rates of Federal Government Grants to University of Manitoba vs. Research Support Funds: 2007 to 2018 ........................................................................................................................................................... 57 19. Canada Foundation for Innovation and Manitoba Research and Innovation Fund Awards: 2012 to 2017 ........................................................................................................................................................... 58 20. Background on Canada Research Chairs Program ................................................................................... 59 21. Special Funds Net Revenues: 2013 to 2017................................................................................................. 60 22. Capital Asset Fund Revenue by Source: 2016/17 ...................................................................................... 61 23. Capital Acquisitions: 2004 to 2017 ................................................................................................................. 62 24. University Investment Trust Market Values: 2005 to 2017 ..................................................................... 63 25. Selected Statistics ................................................................................................................................................. 64 VII. Glossary of Terms ............................................................................................................................................................... 65 Accessible version of this document available upon request. IMPORTANT NOTE TO READERS The University of Manitoba Budget Framework is presented as a document that supports budget and planning transparency, accountability and communication to the members of the University community. This resource has been developed to ensure the University community has access to the organization’s financial and planning information, including linkages to related and relevant information that assists in our decision-making. In order to enhance clarity, when a term appears in brown bold typeface within the text, the reader will find a definition in the Glossary of Terms. Appendixes and Section links are indicated in bold typeface and underlined. Phrases or words underlined and in grey bold typeface indicate a link external to this document. Clicking on internal links for glossary terms or section references will take you to a corresponding point within
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alberta Hansard
    Province of Alberta The 30th Legislature First Session Alberta Hansard Wednesday morning, December 4, 2019 Day 52 The Honourable Nathan M. Cooper, Speaker Legislative Assembly of Alberta The 30th Legislature First Session Cooper, Hon. Nathan M., Olds-Didsbury-Three Hills (UCP), Speaker Pitt, Angela D., Airdrie-East (UCP), Deputy Speaker and Chair of Committees Milliken, Nicholas, Calgary-Currie (UCP), Deputy Chair of Committees Aheer, Hon. Leela Sharon, Chestermere-Strathmore (UCP) Nally, Hon. Dale, Morinville-St. Albert (UCP) Allard, Tracy L., Grande Prairie (UCP) Neudorf, Nathan T., Lethbridge-East (UCP) Amery, Mickey K., Calgary-Cross (UCP) Nicolaides, Hon. Demetrios, Calgary-Bow (UCP) Armstrong-Homeniuk, Jackie, Nielsen, Christian E., Edmonton-Decore (NDP) Fort Saskatchewan-Vegreville (UCP) Nixon, Hon. Jason, Rimbey-Rocky Mountain House-Sundre Barnes, Drew, Cypress-Medicine Hat (UCP) (UCP), Government House Leader Bilous, Deron, Edmonton-Beverly-Clareview (NDP), Nixon, Jeremy P., Calgary-Klein (UCP) Official Opposition House Leader Notley, Rachel, Edmonton-Strathcona (NDP), Carson, Jonathon, Edmonton-West Henday (NDP) Leader of the Official Opposition Ceci, Joe, Calgary-Buffalo (NDP) Orr, Ronald, Lacombe-Ponoka (UCP) Copping, Hon. Jason C., Calgary-Varsity (UCP) Pancholi, Rakhi, Edmonton-Whitemud (NDP) Dach, Lorne, Edmonton-McClung (NDP) Panda, Hon. Prasad, Calgary-Edgemont (UCP) Dang, Thomas, Edmonton-South (NDP) Phillips, Shannon, Lethbridge-West (NDP) Deol, Jasvir, Edmonton-Meadows (NDP) Pon, Hon. Josephine, Calgary-Beddington (UCP) Dreeshen, Hon. Devin, Innisfail-Sylvan Lake (UCP) Rehn, Pat, Lesser Slave Lake (UCP) Eggen, David, Edmonton-North West (NDP), Reid, Roger W., Livingstone-Macleod (UCP) Official Opposition Whip Renaud, Marie F., St. Albert (NDP) Ellis, Mike, Calgary-West (UCP), Government Whip Rosin, Miranda D., Banff-Kananaskis (UCP) Feehan, Richard, Edmonton-Rutherford (NDP) Rowswell, Garth, Vermilion-Lloydminster-Wainwright (UCP) Fir, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • CFSNL-2019-Budget-Submission.Pdf
    BUDGET 2019 PREPARED BY THE CANADIAN FEDERATION OF STUDENTS OF NEWFOUNDLAND & LABRADOR [email protected] https://cfs-fcee.ca/components/nl/ CANADIAN FEDERATION OF STUDENTS NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR Grenfell Campus Student Union Marine Institute Students’ Union Memorial University of Newfoundland Students’ Union Graduate Students’ Union of the Memorial University of Newfoundland College of the North Atlantic Students’ Union Canadian Federation of Students-NL: 2019 Budget Submission EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Canadian Federation of Students and its predecessor organizations have been the democratic voice of Canada’s university and college students for over eighty years. Today the Federation unites over 500,000 university and college students across Canada, including every one of the over 28,000 students enrolled in public post- secondary institutions in Newfoundland and Labrador. The Federation welcomes the opportunity to provide input on the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s budgetary visions. Provincial budgets reflect the priorities of the government and thus should reflect the priorities of the people of the province. The provincial budget ought to play an essential role in promoting the economic and social prosperity of our province and its people. While there are many areas that can benefit from government investment, there is arguably no higher priority than investing in post-secondary education, and ultimately, our collective future. Newfoundlanders and Labradorians believe that access to post-secondary education is essential to ensuring the future prosperity of the province. Since 1998, successive governments have implemented tuition fee freezes and reductions, reintroduced upfront need-based grants, and eliminated interest rates charged on student loans. These policy decisions once resulted in the province boasting the most accessible system of post-secondary education in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • POLICY PAPER International Students & International Education
    POLICY PAPER International Students & International Education Spring 2020 Prepared by: Shawn Cruz, Vice-President University Affairs Wilfrid Laurier University Students’ Union Emma Evans, Research Coordinator Brock University Students’ Union Matthew Gerrits, Vice-President Education Waterloo Undergraduate Student Association Fayza Ibrahim, Provincial and Federal Affairs Commissioner Waterloo Undergraduate Student Association Brook Snider, Associate Vice-President University Affairs Wilfrid Laurier University Students’ Union Megan Town, Councilor and Director Waterloo Undergraduate Student Association With files from: Ryan Tishcoff, Research & Policy Analyst Ontario Undergraduate Student Alliance ABOUT OUSA OUSA represents the interests of 150,000 professional and undergraduate, full-time and part-time university students at eight student associations across Ontario. Our vision is for an accessible, affordable, accountable, and high quality post-secondary education in Ontario. To achieve this vision, we’ve come together to develop solutions to challenges facing higher education, build broad consensus for our policy options, and lobby government to implement them. The member institutions and home office of the Ontario Undergraduate Student Alliance operate on the ancestral and traditional territories of the Attawandaron (Neutral), Haudenosaunee, Huron-Wendat, Leni-Lunaape, Anishnawbek, and Mississauga peoples. This International Students & International Education Policy Paper by the Ontario Undergraduate Student Alliance is licensed under
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Budget Submission Prepared by the Canadian Federation of Students - Newfoundland and Labrador
    2020 PRE-BUDGET SUBMISSION PREPARED BY THE CANADIAN FEDERATION OF STUDENTS - NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR PRE-BUDGET SUBMISSION 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Canadian Federation of Students and its Accordingly, the Canadian Federation of Students - predec essor organizations have been the democratic Newfoundland and Labrador make the following voice of Canada's university and college students for recommendations for policy changes that will help over e ighty years. Today, the Federation unites over reduce financial barriers accessible post-secondary 500,00 0 university and college students across Canada, education and improve the quality of post-secondary includi ng over 27,000 students enrolled in public post- institutions in the province: SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS second ary institutions in Newfoundland and Labrador. The Fe deration welcomes the opportunity to provide RECOMMENDATION 1: Reinstate the tuition freeze for both domestic input on the Government of Newfoundland and and international students at all public post- Labrador's budgetary visions. secondary institutions in Newfoundland and The provincial budget determines the priorities of the Labrador. government and plays an essential role in promoting the RECOMMENDATION 2: economic and social prosperity of Newfoundland and Reinstate the full need-based grant system in Newfoundland and Labrador. Labrador. Although many areas can benefit from government investment, there can be no higher priority RECOMMENDATION 3: Establish core funding to ensure all rural than investing in our collective future through post- campuses of Memorial University and the College secondary education. In order for Newfoundland and of the North Atlantic have access to an Labrador to build a strong and qualified labour force independent sexual harassment office.
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta Hansard
    Province of Alberta The 30th Legislature First Session Alberta Hansard Tuesday evening, October 29, 2019 Day 35 The Honourable Nathan M. Cooper, Speaker Legislative Assembly of Alberta The 30th Legislature First Session Cooper, Hon. Nathan M., Olds-Didsbury-Three Hills (UCP), Speaker Pitt, Angela D., Airdrie-East (UCP), Deputy Speaker and Chair of Committees Milliken, Nicholas, Calgary-Currie (UCP), Deputy Chair of Committees Aheer, Hon. Leela Sharon, Chestermere-Strathmore (UCP) Nally, Hon. Dale, Morinville-St. Albert (UCP) Allard, Tracy L., Grande Prairie (UCP) Neudorf, Nathan T., Lethbridge-East (UCP) Amery, Mickey K., Calgary-Cross (UCP) Nicolaides, Hon. Demetrios, Calgary-Bow (UCP) Armstrong-Homeniuk, Jackie, Nielsen, Christian E., Edmonton-Decore (NDP) Fort Saskatchewan-Vegreville (UCP) Nixon, Hon. Jason, Rimbey-Rocky Mountain House-Sundre Barnes, Drew, Cypress-Medicine Hat (UCP) (UCP), Government House Leader Bilous, Deron, Edmonton-Beverly-Clareview (NDP), Nixon, Jeremy P., Calgary-Klein (UCP) Official Opposition House Leader Notley, Rachel, Edmonton-Strathcona (NDP), Carson, Jonathon, Edmonton-West Henday (NDP) Leader of the Official Opposition Ceci, Joe, Calgary-Buffalo (NDP) Orr, Ronald, Lacombe-Ponoka (UCP) Copping, Hon. Jason C., Calgary-Varsity (UCP) Pancholi, Rakhi, Edmonton-Whitemud (NDP) Dach, Lorne, Edmonton-McClung (NDP) Panda, Hon. Prasad, Calgary-Edgemont (UCP) Dang, Thomas, Edmonton-South (NDP) Phillips, Shannon, Lethbridge-West (NDP) Deol, Jasvir, Edmonton-Meadows (NDP) Pon, Hon. Josephine, Calgary-Beddington (UCP) Dreeshen, Hon. Devin, Innisfail-Sylvan Lake (UCP) Rehn, Pat, Lesser Slave Lake (UCP) Eggen, David, Edmonton-North West (NDP), Reid, Roger W., Livingstone-Macleod (UCP) Official Opposition Whip Renaud, Marie F., St. Albert (NDP) Ellis, Mike, Calgary-West (UCP), Government Whip Rosin, Miranda D., Banff-Kananaskis (UCP) Feehan, Richard, Edmonton-Rutherford (NDP) Rowswell, Garth, Vermilion-Lloydminster-Wainwright (UCP) Fir, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Self-Interest and Socio-Economic Resources for Youth Protest
    Maple Spring Up Close: The Role of Self-Interest and Socio-Economic Resources for Youth Protest Dietlind Stolle, McGill University Allison Harell, Université du Québec à Montréal Eva Falk Pedersen, McGill University Pascale Dufour, Université de Montréal In the spring of 2012, Quebec witnessed one of the most extended and ongoing strike and protest activities around the issue of tuition hikes. Thousands of Cegep and university students went to the streets, banged on pots or boycotted their courses in order to express their views on the government’s proposed tuition increase. In this study, we examine a unique sample of all university students of Université de Montréal, UQAM, and McGill who responded to our survey. First, how do students who favour the tuition increase differ from those who are against it in terms of financial circumstances, family situation or social relations? Second, which factors lead students to protest on the streets? This paper represents one of the first empirical analyses of student’s views on and actions in the Maple Spring. This paper was prepared for presentation at the Canadian Political Science Association Annual Meeting in Victoria, BC, June 4-6, 2013. We would like to thank Maria Surilas and Kaitlyn Shannon for their excellent research assistance. 1 Introduction Falling levels of youth engagement in the electoral process in Canada and elsewhere has been a subject of both academic and public debate. Past research suggests that electoral forms of political participation such as voting have declined among the younger generations and particularly among disadvantaged youth (Gidengil et al. 2003; Franklin 2004; Dalton 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Projected Financial Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Canadian Universities for the 2020/21 Academic Year
    Catalogue no. 81-595-M ISSN 2563-6251 ISBN 978-0-660-38554-9 Education, learning and training: Research Paper Series Projected Financial Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Canadian Universities for the 2020/21 Academic Year by Christopher Matias, Andrija Popovic and André Lebel Release date: August 18, 2021 How to obtain more information For information about this product or the wide range of services and data available from Statistics Canada, visit our website, www.statcan.gc.ca. You can also contact us by Email at [email protected] Telephone, from Monday to Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., at the following numbers: • Statistical Information Service 1-800-263-1136 • National telecommunications device for the hearing impaired 1-800-363-7629 • Fax line 1-514-283-9350 Depository Services Program • Inquiries line 1-800-635-7943 • Fax line 1-800-565-7757 Standards of service to the public Note of appreciation Statistics Canada is committed to serving its clients in Canada owes the success of its statistical system to a a prompt, reliable and courteous manner. To this end, long-standing partnership between Statistics Canada, the Statistics Canada has developed standards of service citizens of Canada, its businesses, governments and other that its employees observe. To obtain a copy of these institutions. Accurate and timely statistical information service standards, please contact Statistics Canada could not be produced without their continued co-operation toll-free at 1-800-263-1136. The service standards are also and goodwill. published on www.statcan.gc.ca under “Contact us” > “Standards of service to the public”.
    [Show full text]
  • Thawing the Tuition Freeze: the Politics of Policy Change in Comparative Perspective
    Canadian Political Science Review Vol. 9, No. 2, 2015 pp. 79-111 Thawing the Tuition Freeze: The Politics of Policy Change in Comparative Perspective Deanna Rexe Adjunct Professor, Faculty of Education Affiliated Scholar, Center for the Study of Educational Leadership and Policy, Simon Fraser University Email address: [email protected] Abstract: This comparative study of two cases draws upon alternative theories of policy change to explore the dynamics of tuition policy formation in Canada. The research examined five key dimensions in the policy episodes: (a) goals of policy change, (b) the politics of policy formation, (c) policy coalitions and their stability over time, (d) influence of elected officials and non-elected policy actors, and (e) the effects of environmental conditions such as changing public opinion, change in government, and provincial fiscal climate. Analysis revealed important agenda-setting activities, as well as insights into how policy coalitions influence decision-making in this policy arena. Keywords: tuition, comparative policy analysis Resumé: Cette étude comparative de deux cas de changement de politique en matière de droits de scolarité s’appuie sur de nouvelles théories de changement de politique pour explorer la dynamique du changement de politique en matière de droits de scolarité. La recherche portait sur cinq aspects clés des périodes politiques : (a) les objectifs du changement de politique (b) la politique de l’élaboration de la politique (c) les coalitions politiques et leur stabilité au fil des années (d) l’influence des représentants élus et des acteurs politiques non élus (e) les effets des conditions environnementales comme un changement dans l’opinion publique, un changement de gouvernement et le climat fiscal provincial.
    [Show full text]
  • Rfp/Rft-Std Form
    2021-22 Budget Estimate Submitted to: Saskatchewan Ministry of Advanced Education August 24, 2020 Introduction The world has changed in 2020 and COVID-19 has significantly impacted the way we work, learn and teach. Like other educational institutions across the country and around the world, the University of Saskatchewan rapidly shifted to remote program delivery for our students and remote work for our faculty and staff. We are continuing to operate with minimal in-person contact and are maintaining primarily online program delivery for the fall 2020 term. Our foremost priorities continue to be the health and safety of our faculty, staff, students and the broader community, providing a quality educational experience to our students, and contributing innovation and expertise to help our province and our country recover. In many ways, the current global public health crisis has reinforced our mission to be the university the world needs. The COVID-19 pandemic has provided an acute example of the need for the critical work of university research and infrastructure. With support from the provincial and federal governments, the work of our Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization – International Vaccine Centre (VIDO- InterVac) has come into sharp focus, with human vaccine trials on the near horizon. The Canadian Light Source (CLS) has shifted operations to prioritize research that will aid in understanding, treating and preventing the spread of COVID-19. And Merlis Belsher Place has been transformed into a field hospital as part of the Saskatchewan Health Authority’s pandemic response plan. We are proud to be an integral part of Saskatchewan—and Canada’s—pandemic response and recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • SFU Tuition Report
    Table of Contents Summary……….…………………………………………………………………………………3 I. Introduction….….……………………………………………………………………………..4 II. Tuition History at Simon Fraser University…….…………………………………………..5 III. Post-Secondary Funding in British Columbia…….……………………………………...13 IV. Conclusion…….…………………………………………….………………………………17 Notes…….…………………………………………….…………………………………………18 Appendix…….…………………………………………….…………………………………….20 2 | P a g e Summary This March 2019 Tuition Freeze Now! SFU Tuition Report looks at historical trends in tuition and fees for domestic and international, undergraduate and graduate students attending Simon Fraser University (SFU). It shows how different student groups have seen their costs rise over time as well as how the cost ratio between groups has evolved. The affordability and sustainability of these tuition hikes is addressed in detail. In addition, there is a discussion of the broader British Columbia government policy regime with respect to university funding as well as recent trends in the value of operating grants provided to universities in the province, relative to the size of the economy and the number of university-aged youth. The report concludes with suggestions for both the SFU administration and BC government on how to address the serious affordability issues facing students today. Key takeaways include the following: Tuition increases since the 2001-02 academic year have greatly outpaced inflation, to the point where domestic undergraduate as well as graduate tuition and fees have more than doubled, and international undergraduates have seen their costs almost triple. Unlike domestic and graduate students, international undergraduate students have seen no cap on fee increases, with the predictable result of skyrocketing tuition that has set them apart from the other student groups. Graduate students have seen their tuition and fees outpace their costs of living while a primary income source, teaching assistant wages, has failed to keep pace in recent years.
    [Show full text]
  • ONTARIO's NEXT TUITION FRAMEWORK
    ONTARIO’s NEXT TUITION FRAMEWORK Reclaiming cost sustainability for students, families & government PART I OF II WHY IS IT CRUCIAL TO THE FUTURE OF ONTARIO TO LIMIT TUITION INCREASES? executive summary It will not come as a surprise to most readers of assistance in the country and that more than this document that students are asking for a shift doubled the size of the post-secondary system in the in Ontario’s tuition policy. Students’ concerns with past 10 years. This type of change does not bend to tuition are so omnipresent in public debate that convenience; rather, it is conducted when there is a they have almost become synonymous with the clear and present need. very notion of a student movement. This harmful i perception can make it seem like the student When it comes to rising tuition, students believe position on tuition is simple and has not evolved that such a need for change exists. Contrary to over time. In turn, the student movement is popular assumptions, students acknowledge and sometimes viewed as overly idealistic and opposed celebrate Ontario’s world-leading participation rate, in principle to any student-borne costs. which has increased in the context of rising tuition. It is not overall participation rates that we believe It is really too bad, because the student movement create a need for change. Rather, the need stems is far from simple; so too are our concerns around from a variety of short-term conditions and long- tuition increases. term impacts that will make the continuation of the current framework problematic for the future of our Students’ reasoning for collective advocacy is two- province.
    [Show full text]
  • Post- Secondary Education Between 1999 and 2013
    Investing in Manitoba's Future: Post- Secondary Education Between 1999 and 2013 ANDREA D. ROUNCE I. INTRODUCTION: THE POLICY ENVIRONMENT ost-secondary education (PSE) is an important policy area and policy instrument for governments, including the Manitoba 2013 CanLIIDocs 345 P government. A provincial responsibility under section 91 of the Canadian Constitution, PSE is vital for economic development and innovation. It is also key for meeting the educational needs of specific populations, such as Francophone Manitobans (through the Université de Saint-Boniface), Mennonites (through the Canadian Mennonite University), and other religious traditions, thus contributing to societal diversity.1 It is a key component of Manitoba's Northern Development Strategy. It can be part of an immigration/migration strategy; useful for drawing in people from other provinces and countries, providing them connections to the community, and working to keep them in Manitoba.2 Government Author is Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Studies, University of Manitoba. Alana Kernaghan's research assistance was invaluable. The author wishes to thank Alana for her attention to detail and tenacity in finding government documentation. Thank you also to the anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful and extremely helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article. Any remaining errors are my own. 1 Manitoba, Legislative Assembly, Official Report of Debates, 40th Leg, 2nd Sess, Vol 2012b (19 November 2012) (Speech from the Throne) [Speech from the Throne, 2012]. 2 Manitoba, Legislative Assembly, Official Report of Debates, 38th Leg, 5nd Sess, Vol 2007 (4 April 2007) (Manitoba Budget Speech) at 7; Speech from the Throne, 2012, supra note 1.
    [Show full text]