Human Genome Project
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Genomics and Its Impact on Science and Society: the Human Genome Project and Beyond
DOE/SC-0083 Genomics and Its Impact on Science and Society The Human Genome Project and Beyond U.S. Department of Energy Genome Research Programs: genomics.energy.gov A Primer ells are the fundamental working units of every living system. All the instructions Cneeded to direct their activities are contained within the chemical DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid). DNA from all organisms is made up of the same chemical and physical components. The DNA sequence is the particular side-by-side arrangement of bases along the DNA strand (e.g., ATTCCGGA). This order spells out the exact instruc- tions required to create a particular organism with protein complex its own unique traits. The genome is an organism’s complete set of DNA. Genomes vary widely in size: The smallest known genome for a free-living organism (a bac- terium) contains about 600,000 DNA base pairs, while human and mouse genomes have some From Genes to Proteins 3 billion (see p. 3). Except for mature red blood cells, all human cells contain a complete genome. Although genes get a lot of attention, the proteins DNA in each human cell is packaged into 46 chro- perform most life functions and even comprise the mosomes arranged into 23 pairs. Each chromosome is majority of cellular structures. Proteins are large, complex a physically separate molecule of DNA that ranges in molecules made up of chains of small chemical com- length from about 50 million to 250 million base pairs. pounds called amino acids. Chemical properties that A few types of major chromosomal abnormalities, distinguish the 20 different amino acids cause the including missing or extra copies or gross breaks and protein chains to fold up into specific three-dimensional rejoinings (translocations), can be detected by micro- structures that define their particular functions in the cell. -
A High-Stringency Blueprint of the Human Proteome
Providence St. Joseph Health Providence St. Joseph Health Digital Commons Articles, Abstracts, and Reports 10-16-2020 A high-stringency blueprint of the human proteome. Subash Adhikari Edouard C Nice Eric W Deutsch Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, USA. Lydie Lane Gilbert S Omenn See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.psjhealth.org/publications Part of the Genetics and Genomics Commons Recommended Citation Adhikari, Subash; Nice, Edouard C; Deutsch, Eric W; Lane, Lydie; Omenn, Gilbert S; Pennington, Stephen R; Paik, Young-Ki; Overall, Christopher M; Corrales, Fernando J; Cristea, Ileana M; Van Eyk, Jennifer E; Uhlén, Mathias; Lindskog, Cecilia; Chan, Daniel W; Bairoch, Amos; Waddington, James C; Justice, Joshua L; LaBaer, Joshua; Rodriguez, Henry; He, Fuchu; Kostrzewa, Markus; Ping, Peipei; Gundry, Rebekah L; Stewart, Peter; Srivastava, Sanjeeva; Srivastava, Sudhir; Nogueira, Fabio C S; Domont, Gilberto B; Vandenbrouck, Yves; Lam, Maggie P Y; Wennersten, Sara; Vizcaino, Juan Antonio; Wilkins, Marc; Schwenk, Jochen M; Lundberg, Emma; Bandeira, Nuno; Marko-Varga, Gyorgy; Weintraub, Susan T; Pineau, Charles; Kusebauch, Ulrike; Moritz, Robert L; Ahn, Seong Beom; Palmblad, Magnus; Snyder, Michael P; Aebersold, Ruedi; and Baker, Mark S, "A high-stringency blueprint of the human proteome." (2020). Articles, Abstracts, and Reports. 3832. https://digitalcommons.psjhealth.org/publications/3832 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Providence St. Joseph Health -
From the Human Genome Project to Genomic Medicine a Journey to Advance Human Health
From the Human Genome Project to Genomic Medicine A Journey to Advance Human Health Eric Green, M.D., Ph.D. Director, NHGRI The Origin of “Genomics”: 1987 Genomics (1987) “For the newly developing discipline of [genome] mapping/sequencing (including the analysis of the information), we have adopted the term GENOMICS… ‘The Genome Institute’ Office for Human Genome Research 1988-1989 National Center for Human Genome Research 1989-1997 National Human Genome Research Institute 1997-present NHGRI: Circa 1990-2003 Human Genome Project NHGRI Today: Characteristic Features . Relatively young (~28 years) . Relatively small (~1.7% of NIH) . Unusual historical origins (think ‘Human Genome Project’) . Emphasis on ‘Team Science’ (think managed ‘consortia’) . Rapidly disseminating footprint (think ‘genomics’) . Novel societal/bioethics research component (think ‘ELSI’) . Over-achievers for trans-NIH initiatives (think ‘Common Fund’) . Vibrant (and large) Intramural Research Program A Quarter Century of Genomics Human Genome Sequenced for First Time by the Human Genome Project Genomic Medicine An emerging medical discipline that involves using genomic information about an individual as part of their clinical care (e.g., for diagnostic or therapeutic decision- making) and the other implications of that clinical use The Path to Genomic Medicine ? Human Realization of Genome Genomic Project Medicine Nature Nature Base Pairs to Bedside 2003 Heli201x to 1Health A Quarter Century of Genomics Human Genome Sequenced for First Time by the Human Genome Project -
Next-Generation Sequencing
Tinhofer et al. Radiation Oncology (2015) 10:183 DOI 10.1186/s13014-015-0481-x REVIEW Open Access Next-generation sequencing: hype and hope for development of personalized radiation therapy? Ingeborg Tinhofer1,2*, Franziska Niehr1,2, Robert Konschak1,2, Sandra Liebs2, Matthias Munz3, Albrecht Stenzinger4, Wilko Weichert4,5, Ulrich Keilholz6 and Volker Budach1,2 Abstract The introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the field of cancer research has boosted worldwide efforts of genome-wide personalized oncology aiming at identifying predictive biomarkers and novel actionable targets. Despite considerable progress in understanding the molecular biology of distinct cancer entities by the use of this revolutionary technology and despite contemporaneous innovations in drug development, translation of NGS findings into improved concepts for cancer treatment remains a challenge. The aim of this article is to describe shortly the NGS platforms for DNA sequencing and in more detail key achievements and unresolved hurdles. A special focus will be given on potential clinical applications of this innovative technique in the field of radiation oncology. Introduction and Wong et al. [11]. We will instead focus on key achieve- Recent technological advances in DNA sequencing with ments in cancer genetics and potential clinical applications of greater speed and resolution at lower costs has provided this innovative technique in the field of radiation oncology. new insights in cancer genetics. The next-generation se- quencing (NGS) technology is tremendously facilitating the in-depth genome-wide search for genetic alterations The advantages of NGS which might significantly contribute to aggressive and/or Next-generation sequencing has rapidly been evolv- treatment-resistant phenotypes of cancers, thereby es- ing within the last decade [10]. -
Mapping Our Genes—Genome Projects: How Big? How Fast?
Mapping Our Genes—Genome Projects: How Big? How Fast? April 1988 NTIS order #PB88-212402 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Mapping Our Genes-The Genmne Projects.’ How Big, How Fast? OTA-BA-373 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, April 1988). Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 87-619898 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 (order form can be found in the back of this report) Foreword For the past 2 years, scientific and technical journals in biology and medicine have extensively covered a debate about whether and how to determine the function and order of human genes on human chromosomes and when to determine the sequence of molecular building blocks that comprise DNA in those chromosomes. In 1987, these issues rose to become part of the public agenda. The debate involves science, technol- ogy, and politics. Congress is responsible for ‘(writing the rules” of what various Federal agencies do and for funding their work. This report surveys the points made so far in the debate, focusing on those that most directly influence the policy options facing the U.S. Congress, The House Committee on Energy and Commerce requested that OTA undertake the project. The House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, the Senate Com- mittee on Labor and Human Resources, and the Senate Committee on Energy and Natu- ral Resources also asked OTA to address specific points of concern to them. Congres- sional interest focused on several issues: ● how to assess the rationales for conducting human genome projects, ● how to fund human genome projects (at what level and through which mech- anisms), ● how to coordinate the scientific and technical programs of the several Federal agencies and private interests already supporting various genome projects, and ● how to strike a balance regarding the impact of genome projects on international scientific cooperation and international economic competition in biotechnology. -
FY 1982 Submission Provided
DRAFT DOE/FE-0033 Previous No. DOE/ER-0102 ENERGY MATERIALS COORDINATING COMMITTEE (EMACC) Fiscal Year 1982 March 1983 ANNUAL TECHNICAL REPORT U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20545 DRAFT DOE/FE-0033 Previous No. DOE/ER-0102 ENERGY MATERIALS COORDINATING COMMITTEE (EMACC) Fiscal Year 1982 March 1983 ANNUAL TECHNICAL REPORT U.S. Department of Energy TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION ........................................................ 1 Fiscal Year 1982 Activities ....................................... 2 Materials Funding Trends in the Department of Energy .............. 6 PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS ................................................ 11 - Office of Conservation and Renewable Systems .................... 14 * Office of Building Energy Research Development .............. 14 * Energy Conversion and Utilization Technologies .............. 15 * Division of Energy Storage Technology - Electrochemical Storage Branch .............................. 16 * Office of Vehicle and Engine R&D ............................ 17 * Office of Industrial Programs ............................... 18 * Biomass Energy Technology Division - Biological Hydrogen Program .......................................... 18 * Division of Ocean Energy Technology - Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Program ................................. 19 * Office of Solar Energy/Photovoltaics Energy - Technology - Materials Research ........................... 20 * Wind Energy Technology Division - Large Wind Turbine Research and Technology Development ........................ -
CBIT Annual Report 2012
Centre for Bio-Inspired Technology Annual Report 2012 Centre for Bio-Inspired Technology Institute of Biomedical Engineering Imperial College London South Kensington London SW7 2AZ T +44 (0)20 7594 0701 F +44 (0)20 7594 0704 [email protected] www.imperial.ac.uk/bioinspiredtechnology Centre for Bio-Inspired Technology Annual Report 2012 3 Director’s foreword 22 Medical science in the 21st century: a young engineer’s view 4 Founding Sponsor’s foreword 24 Clinical assessment of the 5 People bio-inspired artificial pancreas in 7 News subjects with type 1 diabetes 7 Honours and awards 26 Development of a genetic analysis 8 People and events platform to create innovative and 10 News from the interactive databases combining genotypic Centre’s ‘spin-out’ companies and phenotypic information for genetic detection devices 12 Research funding 29 Chip gallery 13 Research themes 33 Who we are 14 Metabolic technology 35 Academic staff profiles 15 Cardiovascular technology 40 Administrative staff profiles 16 Genetic technology 42 Staff research reports 17 Neural interfaces & neuroprosthetics 56 Research Students’ and 19 Research facilities Assistants’ reports 1 2 Centre for Bio-Inspired Technology | Annual Report 2012 Director’s foreword This Research Report for 2012 describes research institute, our collaborators include the research activities of The Centre for engineers, scientists, medical researchers and clinicians. We include here some brief reports of these Bio-Inspired Technology as it completes colleagues and how their current research has its third year of research. It is a privilege developed from their work in the Centre. to be Director of the Centre and to work One of the prime aims of the Institute of Biomedical with my colleagues at Imperial and Engineering, from which the Centre developed, was to around the world on a range of transfer technology from the laboratory into a innovative projects. -
PROTEOMICS the Human Proteome Takes the Spotlight
RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS PROTEOMICS The human proteome takes the spotlight Two papers report mass spectrometry– big data. “We then thought, include some surpris- based draft maps of the human proteome ‘What is a potentially good ing findings. For example, and provide broadly accessible resources. illustration for the utility Kuster’s team found protein For years, members of the proteomics of such a database?’” says evidence for 430 long inter- community have been trying to garner sup- Kuster. “We very quickly genic noncoding RNAs, port for a large-scale project to exhaustively got to the idea, ‘Why don’t which have been thought map the normal human proteome, including we try to put together the not to be translated into pro- identifying all post-translational modifica- human proteome?’” tein. Pandey’s team refined tions and protein-protein interactions and The two groups took the annotations of 808 genes providing targeted mass spectrometry assays slightly different strategies and also found evidence and antibodies for all human proteins. But a towards this common goal. for the translation of many Nik Spencer/Nature Publishing Group Publishing Nik Spencer/Nature lack of consensus on how to exactly define Pandey’s lab examined 30 noncoding RNAs and pseu- Two groups provide mass the proteome, how to carry out such a mis- normal tissues, including spectrometry evidence for dogenes. sion and whether the technology is ready has adult and fetal tissues, as ~90% of the human proteome. Obtaining evidence for not so far convinced any funding agencies to well as primary hematopoi- the last roughly 10% of pro- fund on such an ambitious project. -
The Moments That Matter Annual Report: July 2012–June 2013 BOARD of TRUSTEES Honorary Board
The MoMenTs ThaT MaTTer annual reporT: July 2012–June 2013 BOARD oF TrusTees honorary BoarD Herb Scannell, Chair* Kate D. Levin, ex officio Peter H. Darrow President, BBc WorldWide america commissioner, neW york city dePartment senior counsel, oF cultural aFFairs cleary gottlieB steen & hamilton, llP Cynthia King Vance, Vice Chair*, Chair† advanced strategies, LLC Anton J. Levy Eduardo G. Mestre managing director, chairman, gloBal advisory, Alexander Kaplen, Vice Chair* general atlantic LLC evercore Partners executive, time Warner Joanne B. Matthews Thomas B. Morgan John S. Rose, Vice Chair† PhilanthroPist senior Partner and managing director, Lulu C. Wang the Boston consulting grouP Bethany Millard ceo, tuPelo caPital management, LLC PhilanthroPist Susan Rebell Solomon, Vice Chair† retired Partner, Richard A. Pace neW YORK puBlIC raDIo senIor sTaFF mercer management consulting executive vice President, Bank oF neW york mellon, retired Laura R. Walker Mayo Stuntz, Vice Chair† President and ceo memBer, Pilot grouP Ellen Polaner Dean Cappello Howard S. Stein, Treasurer Jonelle Procope chieF content oFFicer managing director, gloBal corPorate President and ceo, and senior vice President and investment Bank, citigrouP, retired aPollo theater Foundation Thomas Bartunek Alan G. Weiler, Secretary Jon W. Rotenstreich vice President, PrinciPal, managing Partner, Planning and sPecial ProJects Weiler arnoW management co., inc. rotenstreich Family Partners Thomas Hjelm Laura R. Walker, President and CEO Joshua Sapan chieF digital oFFicer and vice President, neW york PuBlic radio President and ceo, amc netWorks Business develoPment Jean B. Angell Lauren Seikaly Margaret Hunt retired Partner and memBer, Private theater Producer and actress vice President, develoPment client service grouP, Bryan cave Peter Shapiro Noreen O’Loughlin Tom A. -
Next-Generation Sequencing for Cancer Diagnostics: a Practical Perspective
Review Article Next-Generation Sequencing for Cancer Diagnostics: a Practical Perspective Cliff Meldrum,1,4† Maria A Doyle,2† *Richard W Tothill3 1Molecular Pathology, Hunter Area Pathology Service, Newcastle, NSW 2310; 2Bioinformatics and 3Next-generation DNA Sequencing Facility Research Department and 4Pathology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic. 3002, Australia. †These authors contributed equally to this manuscript. *For correspondence: Dr Richard Tothill, [email protected] Abstract Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is arguably one of the most significant technological advances in the biological sciences of the last 30 years. The second generation sequencing platforms have advanced rapidly to the point that several genomes can now be sequenced simultaneously in a single instrument run in under two weeks. Targeted DNA enrichment methods allow even higher genome throughput at a reduced cost per sample. Medical research has embraced the technology and the cancer field is at the forefront of these efforts given the genetic aspects of the disease. World-wide efforts to catalogue mutations in multiple cancer types are underway and this is likely to lead to new discoveries that will be translated to new diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic targets. NGS is now maturing to the point where it is being considered by many laboratories for routine diagnostic use. The sensitivity, speed and reduced cost per sample make it a highly attractive platform compared to other sequencing modalities. Moreover, as we identify more genetic determinants of cancer there is a greater need to adopt multi-gene assays that can quickly and reliably sequence complete genes from individual patient samples. Whilst widespread and routine use of whole genome sequencing is likely to be a few years away, there are immediate opportunities to implement NGS for clinical use. -
US Neutron Facility Development in the Last Half-Century: a Cautionary Tale
Phys. Perspect. Ó 2015 The Author(s). This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com DOI 10.1007/s00016-015-0158-8 Physics in Perspective US Neutron Facility Development in the Last Half-Century: A Cautionary Tale John J. Rush* Large multi-user facilities serve many thousands of researchers in fields from particle physics to fundamental biology. The great expense—up to billions of current-day dollars— and the complexity of such facilities required access to extensive engineering and research infrastructures, most often found at national laboratories and the largest research univer- sities. Although the development of such facilities has been largely successful and the research results unique and often spectacular, the processes for choosing, funding, and locating them were complex and not always productive. In this review, I describe the troubled efforts over the past fifty years to develop neutron research facilities in the United States. During this period, the US has moved from a preeminent position in neutron-based science to a lesser status with respect to Europe. Several major US centers of excellence have been shut down and replaced with more focused capabilities. I compare the US efforts in neutron facilities with parallel developments in Europe and Asia, discuss the reasons for this state of affairs, and make some suggestions to help prevent similar consequences in the future. Key words: neutron research; national laboratories; Department of Energy; National Institute of Standards and Technology; research reactors; spallation neutron sources; Institut Laue-Langevin; National Academy of Sciences. Introduction A major element in the great expansion both of US and international science since the Second World War has been the development of large multi-user facilities to serve many thousands of researchers around the world with applications in almost all fields, ranging from particle physics to fundamental biology. -
Genome Mapping / Human Genome Project
EthxWeb Search Results Search Detail: Result=(((AV.PT.) AND ("15.10"[PC])) OR ((("15.10"[PC]) AND (B.PT.)) AND (@YD > "19991231"))) OR (((("15.10"[PC] ) AND (Y.BL.)) NOT (LETTER.TI.)) AND (@YD > "19991231")) 2=1 : " Documents: 1 281 of 281 Document 1 Lifton, Richard P. Individual genomes on the horizon. [editorial] New England Journal of Medicine 2010 April 1; 362(13): 12351236 Georgetown users check Georgetown Journal Finder for access to full text http://content.nejm.org/content/vol362/issue13/ (link may be outdated) Document 2 Lumley, Thomas; Rice, Kenneth Potential for revealing individuallevel information in genomewide association studies. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2010 February 17; 303(7): 659660 Georgetown users check Georgetown Journal Finder for access to full text http://jama.amaassn.org/content/vol303/issue7/ (link may be outdated) Document 3 Via, Marc; Gignoux, Christopher; Burchard, Esteban González The 1000 Genomes Project: new opportunities for research and social challenges Genome Medicine [electronic] 2010 January 21; 2(1): 3p. Accessed: http://genomemedicine.com [2010 February 24] Georgetown users check Georgetown Journal Finder for access to full text http://genomemedicine.com (link may be outdated) Document 4 Marturano, Antonio When speed truly matters, openness is the answer. Bioethics 2009 September; 23(7): 385393 Abstract: In this paper I analyse the ethical implications of the two main competing methodologies in genomic research. I do not aim to provide another contribution from the mainstream legal and public policy perspective; rather I offer a novel approach in which I analyse and describe the patentandpublish regime (the proprietary regime) led by biologist J.