DOCSLIB.ORG

Interpretation: a Journal of Political Philosophy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interpretation: a Journal of Political Philosophy Interpretation A JOURNAL A OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY Winter 2000-2001 Volume 28 Number 2 119 Lee Ward Rhetoric and Natural Rights in Algernon Sidney's Discourses Concerning Government 147 Ian Donaldson Democratic Theory and the Significance of Walter Kaufmann's Aristotelian Nietzsche Book Reviews 165 Scott R. Hemmenway The Paradox of Political Socrates' Philosophy: Philosophic Trial, by Jacob Howland 173 Harrison Sheppard What, Then, Is Time?, by Eva Brann 181 Susan Orr Philosopher at Work: Essays by Yves R. Simon, edited by Anthony O. Simon Interpretation Editor-in-Chief Hilail Gildin, Dept. of Philosophy, Queens College Executive Editor Leonard Grey General Editors Seth G. Benardete Charles E. Butterworth Hilail Gildin Robert Horwitz (d. 1987) Howard B. White (d. 1974) Consulting Editors Christopher Bruell Joseph Cropsey Ernest L. Fortin John Hallowell (d. 1992) Harry V. Jaffa David Lowenthal Muhsin Mahdi Harvey C. Mansfield Arnaldo Momigliano (d. 1987) Michael Oakeshott (d. 1990) Ellis Sandoz Leo Strauss (d. 1973) Kenneth W. Thompson International Editors Terence E. Marshall Heinrich Meier Editors Wayne Ambler Maurice Auerbach Fred Baumann Amy Bonnette Patrick Coby Elizabeth C de Baca Eastman Thomas S. Engeman Edward J. Erler - Maureen Feder-Marcus Pamela K. Jensen Ken Masugi Will Morrisey Susan Orr Charles T. Rubin Leslie G. Rubin Susan Meld Shell Bradford P. Wilson Martin D. Yaffe Michael P. Zuckert Catherine H. Zuckert Manuscript Editor Lucia B. Prochnow Subscriptions Subscription rates per volume (3 issues): individuals $29 libraries and all other institutions $48 students (four-year limit) $18 Single copies available. Postage outside U.S.: Canada $4.50 extra; elsewhere $5.40 extra by surface mail (8 weeks or longer) or $ 1 1 .00 by air. Payments: in U.S. dollars AND payable by a financial institution located within the U.S.A. (or the U.S. Postal Service). The Journal Welcomes Manuscripts in Political Philosophy as Well as Those in Theology, Literature, and Jurisprudence. contributors should follow The Chicago Manual of Style, 13th or later editions "reference-list" or manuals based on them. Instead of endnotes, the journal uses the (or "author-date") system of notation, described in these manuals, illustrated in cur rent numbers of the journal, and discussed in a sheet available from the Assistant to the Editor (see below). Words from languages not rooted in Latin should be trans literated to English. To ensure impartial judgment, contributors should omit mention of their other publications and put, on the title page only, their name, any affiliation desired, address with postal zip code in full, E-mail address, and telephone number. Please send four clear copies, which will not be returned, and double space the entire text and reference list. Composition by Bytheway Publishing Services Binghamton, NY 13901 U.S.A. Printed by the Sheridan Press Hanover, PA 17331 U.S.A. Inquiries: (Ms.) Joan Walsh, Assistant to the Editor interpretation , Queens College, Flushing, N.Y 1 1367-1597, U.S.A. (718)997-5542 Fax (718) 997-5565 E Mail: interpretation [email protected] Rhetoric and Natural Rights in Algernon Sidney's Discourses Concerning Government Lee Ward Kenyon College Algernon Sidney's Discourses Concerning Government present something of a paradox for the modern reader. On the one hand, they were widely recognized in the eighteenth century as being among the seminal texts of early modern constitutionalism (Montesquieu, 1989, pp. 159-60; Wood, 1972, p. 298; Tren- chard and Gordon, 1995, pp. 188-94, 262-66; Karsten, 1978; Houston, 1991, chap. 6; Adams, 1971, p. 598; Jefferson, 1984, p. 479). On the other hand, until recently Sidney's work suffered from a widespread neglect among scholars of the history of political thought. The Discourses have received only cursory and generally dismissive treatment in the accounts of many notable twentieth- century commentators (e.g., Sabine, 1937, p. 514, and Pocock, 1975, pp. 420- 21). Even Sidney's more enthusiastic commentators criticize the lack of clarity and poor organization of the Discourses (e.g., Fink, 1962, p. 164). Happily, there has been a revival of interest in Sidney over the last two decades. This renewed interest, however, has not produced a consensus regarding the character of Sid ney's political thought. He has been identified variously as a Christian-Aristote lian, a classical republican, a Machiavellian republican, and as an exponent of a hybrid of these strands of thought (Brown, 1984; Fink, 1962; Pangle, 1988, pp. 64-65; Wood, 1972; Sidney, 1996, West's introduction, pp. xxiii-xxv; Nel son, 1993; Scott, 1991; Worden, 1985). While all of these elements are present in the Discourses, in the current debate among Sidney scholars his status as a natural rights thinker has been largely underappreciated (two notable and valu able exceptions are Houston, 1991, and Sullivan, forthcoming). This study will attempt to address this issue. In order to demonstrate Sidney's standing as a modern natural rights thinker we must overcome a central difficulty. The Discourses is a notoriously dense and voluminous book and inasmuch as Sidney offers it as a detailed refutation of the divine right monarchist Robert Filmer, it appears to contain no rhetorical structure or internal design independent of Filmer's unsystematic presentation in Patriarcha. In the course of his refutation of Filmer, Sidney presents and defends positions consistent with Christian-Aristotelianism and classical as well as Machiavellian republicanism. While this situation does invite the cacophony of interpretive voices that we hear in Sidney scholarship today, I argue that Sidney's modern natural rights teaching can be identified by paying careful interpretation, Winter 2000-2001, Vol. 28, No. 2 120 Interpretation the attention to the plan of the book and the movement of the argument in Discourses. complex. he sought to Sidney's rhetorical strategy in this work was First, defend the doctrine of natural liberty against divine right theory. Filmer was a in a highly polemical writer who vigorously opposed and critiqued, typically disjointed and unsystematic fashion, practically every strand of thought in the natural liberty school of the mid-seventeenth century. This diverse body of thought, including Jesuit scholasticism, classical and Machiavellian republican ism, as well as the natural jurisprudence of Hugo Grotius and Thomas Hobbes, was by no means univocal in the specifics of consent theory. The natural liberty school was, however, united in its opposition to divine right and in its support for the general principle of consent. With his critique of Filmer, Sidney sought to locate his own defense of the Whig position in England within the broad spectrum of the loosely aligned natural liberty camp. As such, he defended several theoretical positions, such as those commonly ascribed to him, which were grounded on that doctrine. By this Sidney hoped to demonstrate the nov elty, indeed the perversity, of Filmer's position by showing its hostility to the commonly accepted doctrine of natural liberty central to so many influential strands of thought in seventeenth-century Europe. Sidney's second and more fundamental aim was to use this defense of tradi tional notions of natural liberty in order to introduce, by means of these estab lished and respectable premises, his more radical version of that doctrine: a modem theory of natural rights. Like Locke, Sidney was not insensitive to the potential personal dangers and political disadvantages attached to his argument being publicly associated with the modern natural rights theories of the "justly decried" Hobbes and Spinoza. (For Locke's public disassociation of his work with that of Hobbes and Spinoza, see Locke, 1988, p. 74; and for good discus sions of Locke's famous caution, see Cox, 1960, pp. 1-44; Pangle, 1988, pp. 132-38; Strauss, 1953, pp. 206-9, 220, 246; Zuckert, 1974, pp. 544-64, 1977, pp. 55-66.) In the politically charged climate of Exclusion-era England, Sidney saw the necessity to devise a rhetorical strategy somewhat obscuring the radical character of his rights theory. The plan of the Discourses allowed him to make the case for natural rights in a manner possessing broader political appeal than that of the publicly condemned works of his philosophical kindred spirits Machi avelli, Hobbes and Spinoza. In effect, Sidney turned Filmer's eclectic combat- iveness to his own rhetorical advantage by using this defense of the natural liberty doctrine broadly conceived as a more or less respectable and largely unobjectionable platform for his own more radical position. Sidney guides his reader through carefully calibrated arguments from a moderate antiabsolutist stance to an increasingly populist version of consent theory and natural rights. shall argue that the first two of I the book's three lengthy chapters advance arguments and positions which are modified in Sidney's subsequent discussion. the phase of his of In initial refutation Robert Filmer, Sidney defends two major Rhetoric and Natural Rights in Algernon Sidney 121 alternatives to divine right monarchy: Christian-Aristotelian consent theory and classical republicanism. In the latter portion of the work, however, Sidney modi fies and ultimately rejects these traditional models of political thought in favor of a distinctly modern natural rights teaching paralleling and deeply influenced by Machiavelli, Hobbes and Spinoza. The unfolding and increasingly radical character of Sidney's argument culminates in a defense
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Algernon Sidney on Public Right
    University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review Volume 10 Issue 2 Article 3 1987 Algernon Sidney on Public Right Edward Dumbauld Follow this and additional works at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview Part of the European Law Commons, and the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Edward Dumbauld, Algernon Sidney on Public Right, 10 U. ARK. LITTLE ROCK L. REV. 317 (1988). Available at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview/vol10/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review by an authorized editor of Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ALGERNON SIDNEY ON PUBLIC RIGHT Hon. Edward Dumbauld* In response to criticisms that the Declaration of Independence lacked originality,' its author Thomas Jefferson explained that the political purpose and object of that document was: not to find out new principles, or new arguments, never before thought of, not merely to say things which had never been said before; but to place before mankind the common sense of the sub- ject, in terms so plain and firm as to command their assent, and to justify ourselves in the independent stand we are compelled to take. Neither aiming at originality of principle or sentiment, nor yet cop- ied from any particular and previous writing,' it was intended to be an expression of the American mind, and to give to that expression the proper tone and spirit called for by the occasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Assistant Professor of History, Sam Houston State University
    Benjamin E. Park Assistant Professor of History, Sam Houston State University Mailing Address: Contact Information: Department of History email: [email protected] Box 2239 phone: (505) 573-0509 Sam Houston State University website: benjaminepark.com Huntsville, TX 77341 twitter: @BenjaminEPark EDUCATION 2014 Ph.D., History, University of Cambridge 2011 M.Phil., Political Thought and Intellectual History, University of Cambridge -with distinction 2010 M.Sc., Historical Theology, University of Edinburgh -with distinction 2009 B.A., English and History, Brigham Young University RESEARCH INTERESTS 18th and 19th Century US history, intersections of culture with religion and politics, intellectual history, history of gender, religious studies, slavery and antislavery, Atlantic history. ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2016- Assistant Professor of History, Sam Houston State University HIST 1301: United States History to 1876 HIST 3360: American Religious History HIST 3377: America in Mid-Passage, 1773-1876 HIST 3378: Emergence of Modern America, 1877-1945 HIST 5371: Revolutionary America (Grad Seminar) HIST 5378: American Cultural and Religious History (Grad Seminar) 2014-2016 Kinder Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of History, University of Missouri HIST 1100: United States History to The Civil War HIST 4000: The Age of Jefferson HIST 4004: 18th Century Revolutions: America, France, Haiti HIST 4972: Religion and Politics in American History 2012-2014 Lecturer and Supervisor, Faculty of History, University of Cambridge Paper 22: American History through 1865 PUBLICATIONS Books American Nationalisms: Imagining Union in the Age of Revolutions, 1783-1833 (Cambridge University Press, January 2018). Benjamin Park C.V. Peer-Reviewed Articles “The Angel of Nullification: Imagining Disunion in an Era Before Secession,” Journal of the Early Republic 37:3 (Fall 2017): 507-536.
    [Show full text]
  • The Apology of Sidney: Explaining Martyrdom Michael Marinaccio Coastal Carolina University
    Coastal Carolina University CCU Digital Commons Honors College and Center for Interdisciplinary Honors Theses Studies Spring 5-15-2009 The Apology of Sidney: Explaining Martyrdom Michael Marinaccio Coastal Carolina University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/honors-theses Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Marinaccio, Michael, "The Apology of Sidney: Explaining Martyrdom" (2009). Honors Theses. 149. https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/honors-theses/149 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College and Center for Interdisciplinary Studies at CCU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of CCU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. By these means I am brought to this place. Lord forgive these practices, and avert the evils that threaten the nation from them. TheThe ApologyLord of sanctify Sidney these my Explaining Martyrdom sufferings unto me; and though I fall as By a sacrifice unto idols,Michael Marinaccio suffer not idolatry Political Science to be established in this land. Bless thy people and save them. Defend thy own cause and defend those that defend it. Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Stir up such as areBachelor of Sciencefaint, direct those In the Honors Program at Coastal Carolina University that are willing, Mayconfirm 2009 those that waver, give wisdom and integrity unto all. Order all things so as may most redound unto thine own glory. Grant that I may die glorifying thee for all thy mercies and that at the last thon hast permitted me to be singled out as a witness of thy truth; and even by the confession of my opposes, for that Old Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Jefferson
    WRITING the DECLARATION 0. WRITING the DECLARATION - Story Preface 1. A BOY'S LIFE 2. TREASURES ... LOST and FOUND 3. EARLY INFLUENCES 4. TOM'S MOUNTAIN 5. A WRITER not a SPEAKER 6. WE ARE ALL BORN FREE 7. THE DECLARATION HOUSE 8. SLAVERY and the DECLARATION 9. WRITING the DECLARATION 10. DECLARATION of INDEPENDENCE 11. IMMEDIATE IMPACT 12. TIME WASTES TOO FAST 13. A MAN of CONTRADICTIONS 14. JEFFERSONIAN QUOTES 15. A SPECIAL 4TH OF JULY This image - from a postcard based on the oil-on-canvas painting by Jean Leon Gerome Ferris (1863-1930) - depicts what it may have been like to watch Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson assessing, and editing, Jefferson's draft of the Declaration of Independence. Online, courtesy Library of Congress. As Jefferson created the document which became America's creed, how much time did he spend on his project? Where did he find words like "the pursuit of happiness?" He greatly respected John Locke, whose Second Treatise of Civil Government (see, for example, chapter 2, section 5) addresses mankind's natural rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of property. He thought Discourses Concerning Government (by Algernon Sidney) - which disputes the "natural power" of kings - "is probably the best elementary book of the principles of government." (See Jefferson's December 13, 1804 letter to Mason Weems.) And ... he admired the philosophy of Scotsman Henry Home (Lord Kames) whose book of essays on morality is one of the few which Jefferson personally annotated. Widely read, Jefferson absorbed the concepts of such writers and merged what he found useful with his own thinking.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Virtue, liberty, and justice: `original principles' in Algernon Sidney's political thought exploration of context and intellectual foundations of the discourses concerning government Lenk, Martin How to cite: Lenk, Martin (2002) Virtue, liberty, and justice: `original principles' in Algernon Sidney's political thought exploration of context and intellectual foundations of the discourses concerning government, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4142/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. VIRTUE, LIBERTY, AND JUSTICE: 'ORIGINAL PRINCIPLES' IN ALGERNON SIDNEY'S POLITICAL THOUGHT EXPLORATION OF CONTEXT AND INTELLECTUAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE DISCOURSES CONCERNING GOVERNMENT A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Arts Martin Lenk Centre for Seventeenth-Century Studies Durham University i OCT nm 2002 Martin Lenk, Virtue, Liberty, and Justice: 'Original principles' in Algernon Sidney's political thought.
    [Show full text]
  • English Republicanism
    Cambridge University Press 0521843758 - Commonwealth Principles: Republican Writing of the English Revolution Jonathan Scott Excerpt More information Introduction: English republicanism ...remembring, that we are now put into a better course, upon the Declared Interest of a Free State or Common-weal, I conceived nothing could more highly tend to the propogation of this Interest, and the honour of its Founders, then . that the People . may . understand what Common-weal Principles are, and thereby...learn to be true Common-wealth’s men, and zealous against Monarchick Interest,inall its Appearances and Incroachments whatsoever. Marchamont Nedham, Mercurius Politicus no. 92, March 1652.1 historiography The historiography of English republicanism is largely a creation of the past half-century. Before Zera Fink’s ground-breaking The Classical Republicans (1945), such a general phenomenon had scarcely been identified.2 Attention to English republican thought was largely confined to James Harrington’s The Commonwealth of Oceana (1656), a work intermittently famous since the year of its publication, and by 1950 at the centre of a renowned dispute about early modern English social development.3 Against this background it is not surprising that the most powerful impact of Fink’s work should have been to furnish the most fertile context to date for our understanding 1 Mercurius Politicus no. 92, 4–11 March 1652,pp.1457–8. 2 Fink, Classical Republicans. When, in his Fellowship dissertation on Political Philosophy in England, F. W. Maitland discussed seventeenth-century ideas of liberty and equality, his reconstruction of contemporary partisanship ranged Milton, Harrington, Sidney and Locke against Filmer, Hobbes, Clarendon and Hume.
    [Show full text]
  • THE REMNANT TRUST, INC. the Wisdom of the Ages Athenaeum At
    The Remnant Trust, Inc. The Wisdom of the Ages Athenaeum at The Columbia Club A u g u s t t o D e c e m b e r 2020 Page 1 1 2 August to December 2020 Exhibition Dante Alighieri This work is Dante Alighieri’s poem entitled “The Vision; or, Hell, Purgatory, and Paradise The Vision; or, of Dante Alighieri,” or more commonly known as “The Divine Comedy.” It was translated Hell, Purgatory, by Reverend H. F. Cary. There is no date given for this book on the copyright page, but and Paradise of the date at the end of the preface is January 1814. Alighieri began working on the poem Dante Alighieri around 1308 and completed it in 1320. He wrote “The Divine Comedy” as an allegory rep- 1814 resenting the soul’s journey towards God and absolution. Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso are the three sections of the poem and make up the three destinations that Dante experi- enced. Using symbolism and drawing upon theology and mythology, Alighieri creates a larg- er-than-life story describing his experience of finding God. The popularity of this piece of literature hasn’t dimin- ished throughout the years and is still considered to be the preeminent work in Italian literature and one the great- est works of world literature. #0905 Susan B. Entitled, “An Account of the Proceedings on the Trial of Susan B. Anthony on the Charge Anthony of Illegal Voting at the Presidential Election in Nov., 1872, and the Trial of Beverly W. An Account of Jones, Edwin T.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Assistant Professor of History, Sam Houston State University
    Benjamin E. Park Assistant Professor of History, Sam Houston State University Mailing Address: Contact Information: Department of History email: [email protected] Box 2239 phone: (505) 573-0509 Sam Houston State University website: benjaminepark.com Huntsville, TX 77341 twitter: @BenjaminEPark EDUCATION 2014 Ph.D., History, University of Cambridge 2011 M.Phil., Political Thought and Intellectual History, University of Cambridge -with distinction 2010 M.Sc., Historical Theology, University of Edinburgh -with distinction 2009 B.A., English and History, Brigham Young University RESEARCH INTERESTS 18th and 19th Century US history, intersections of culture with religion and politics, intellectual history, history of gender, religious studies, slavery and antislavery, Atlantic history. ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2019- Co-Editor, Mormon Studies Review (University of Illinois Press) Volume 8, January 2021 (in press) Volume 7, January 2020 (Associate Editor, 2013-2019) 2016- Assistant Professor of History, Sam Houston State University Director of Graduate Studies, 2020- Chair, Undergraduate Studies, 2017-2020 2014-2016 Kinder Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of History, University of Missouri 2012-2014 Lecturer and Supervisor, Faculty of History, University of Cambridge PUBLICATIONS Books A Companion to American Religious History, ed. (New York: Wiley-Blackwell, January 2021, in press). Kingdom of Nauvoo: The Rise and Fall of a Religious Empire on the American Frontier (W. W. Norton/Liveright, 2020). • Reviews in The New Yorker, Wall Street Journal, Booklist
    [Show full text]
  • Extended Notes for Toward Democracy
    NOTES TO INTRODUCTION 1 EXTENDED NOTES FOR TOWARD DEMOCRACY Note to Readers The following notes, prepared with the help of Abigail Modaff of Harvard University, contain fuller documentation for James T. Kloppenberg, Toward Democracy: The Struggle for Self-Rule in European and American Thought, published by Oxford University Press in June, 2016. Page references within these notes refer to the print version of the book. As is indicated on p. 711 of that edition, many of the notes in this document contain a greater range of references and commentary than are available in the book. Readers will, however, find that a few of the notes that are followed by an asterisk in the print version do not differ from the notes in this document; those asterisks will be removed, and typographical errors corrected, in later printings of Toward Democracy. Introduction 1. See the UNESCO report edited by Richard McKeon, Democracy in a World of Tensions (Chicago, 1951), 522. Influential assessments of the universality of democracy at the turn of the twenty-first century include Amartya Sen, “Democracy as a Universal Value,” Journal of Democracy 10 (1999): 3–17; and the widely circulated report by Freedom House, Democracy’s Century: A Survey of Political Change in the Twentieth Century (New York, 1999), which reported that the number of democratic nations had mushroomed from a mere handful in 1900 to over 60 percent by the end of the century. Although those nations contained less than 40 percent of the world’s population, the report confidently predicted that the further expansion of democracy, now praised if not NOTES TO INTRODUCTION 2 yet practiced everywhere, was only a matter of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Algernon Sidney Between Modern Natural Rights and Machiavellian Republicanism
    Algernon Sidney between Modern Natural Rights and Machiavellian Republicanism Algernon Sidney between Modern Natural Rights and Machiavellian Republicanism By Luís Falcão Translation by Ana Nicolino Algernon Sidney between Modern Natural Rights and Machiavellian Republicanism By Luís Falcão This book first published 2020 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2020 by Luís Falcão All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-5800-2 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-5800-7 This publication is the translation of the first edition, published in Portuguese (FALCÃO, Luís. Algeron Sidney: um pensador republicano do século XVII. Niterói: EdUFF, 2019) It is not necessary to say any thing concerning the person of the author. —John Toland, Preface to the Discourses Concerning Government, London, 1698 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ................................................................................... ix Abbreviations and Clarification on the Main Works Used ...................... xiii Preface ...................................................................................................... xv Presentation ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Patriarchy, Primogeniture and Prescription: Algernon Sidney's
    Scott, Jonathan. "Patriarchy, Primogeniture and Prescription: Algernon Sidney’s Discourses Concerning Government (1698)." Patriarchal Moments: Reading Patriarchal Texts. Ed. Cesare Cuttica. Ed. Gaby Mahlberg. : Bloomsbury Academic, 2016. 73–80. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 3 Oct. 2021. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781472589163.ch-010>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 3 October 2021, 10:28 UTC. Copyright © Cesare Cuttica, Gaby Mahlberg and the Contributors 2016. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 9 Patriarchy, Primogeniture and Prescription: Algernon Sidney’s Discourses Concerning Government (1698) Jonathan Scott CHAPTER ONE SECTION 8: There is no natural propensity in Man or Beast to Monarchy. I see no reason to believe that God did approve the government of one over many, because he created but one; but to the contrary, in as much as he did endow him, and those that came from him, as well the youngest as the eldest line, with understanding to provide for themselves, and by the invention of arts and sciences, to be beneficial to each other; he shewed, that they ought to make use of that understanding in forming governments according to their own convenience, and such occasions as should arise, as well as in other matters; and it might as well be inferr’d, that it is unlawful for us to build, clothe, arm, defend, or nourish ourselves, otherwise than as our first parents did, before, or soon after the Flood, as to take from us the liberty of instituting governments that were not known to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Niccolò Machiavelli. a Paradoxical Success
    Niccolò Machiavelli. A Paradoxical Success Robert Black Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527) is history’s most startling and influential political commentator. The Prince is the world’s most famous (and infamous) work of political theory. 1 The Discourses on Livy are the cornerstone of modern republican thought. 2 Mandragola is the greatest play written in the Italian language.3 The Florentine Histories constituted the first successful neo- classical humanist history in Italian rather than Latin.4 In Machiavelli’s day, Aristotle was the most famous political thinker; in our time, it is Machiavelli.5 In the sixteenth century, more than two hundred printed editions of his writings were published, a further hundred in the next century, and in the eighteenth more than a hundred and seventy.6 Just as today Freud and Marx are universal common currency, so was Machiavelli during the Renaissance.7 In the first century after his death he had his advocates (for example Jean Bodin, who ‘praised him as an exemplary reader of history’,8 and Francis Bacon, who argued ‘that Machiavelli proposed a new intellectual instrument or weapon well adapted to (...) politics’9) but for the most part he was known as the wicked ‘Machiavel’, the godless champion of evil. 10 Machiavelli’s champions praised his realistic vision of politics, whereas his critics condemned his amoral separation of politics from ethics. 1 Niccolò Machiavelli, Il principe, G. Inglese ed. (Turin 2013). 2 Niccolò Machiavelli, Discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito Livio, F. Bausi ed. (Rome 2001). 3 Niccolò Machiavelli, La Mandragola. Storia e filologia, P.
    [Show full text]