Newsletter 2019 May.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Newsletter 2019 May.Pdf THE OWL FOUNDATION NEWS 4117 21st Street, R.R. 1, Vineland Station, Ontario L0R 2E0 905-562-5986 Charitable Registration Number 12431-5094-RR0001 www.theowlfoundation.ca May 2019 A memorial service was held in May for one of our founders, Kay McKeever, who died April 4. (If you didn't receive the obituary from us, it can be found by internet search on Kay's name.) At the memorial several speakers kindly shared their stories about her, and we saw photos from her life. Kay retired from managing the Foundation ten years ago. We carry on the work that Kay and Larry started. Within restrictions of our government permits, we continue to help unreleasable wild owls in our care to enrich their own lives, and contribute to their kind, as parents and foster parents of releasable wild owls. We are preparing to release the young hatched and raised here in 2018, consisting of four Great Grey Owls from Fanny and Fred, one from Petra and Scotty, and four Snowy Owls from SassyQ and Yeti. More Great Grey young have been hatched this year by Fanny and Fred, and Petra and Scotty. Great Grey Sonata is incubating again (her eggs last year did not hatch). SassyQ is also incubating eggs. Some residents are fostering (page 2). Some resident owls have died since our last newsletter. In February we lost one of our oldest residents, the Barn Owl called Banjo, who died from an obstructed bowel. Banjo and his mate Soucy (died 2013) came to us in 1999. Banjo and Soucy hatched and raised many young that were released, and the last young from 2004, who are still with us as residents, as we were no longer allowed to release Barn Owls and had to block further breeding. An unreleasable Long- Eared Owl that we had for a year and that had just been approved by the government as a resident, was found dead. Necropsy indicated intestinal cancer. In March we lost the resident Barred Owl called Blink after a long illness. She had been with us since 2012 and had raised orphaned Barred Owls we received. In May a long-term resident Short-eared Owl called St. Kitt died, of causes to be determined. We have added two new residents, a Snowy Owl and a Saw-whet Owl. Our two female Barn Owl siblings have shared an aviary for years, and had occasional conflicts. We renovated an adjacent outdoor aviary to make it suitable for a Barn Owl, so the two are now living in separate quarters. We renovated the north half of the roof of Fanny and Fred's home aviary, as part of our continuing program of repairing and strengthening roofs in old aviaries. The building of the large new 3-unit aviary for resident Barred Owls continued through fall, winter and spring as weather and resources permitted. The coverings of the aviary are nearing completion. Finally, thank you to you, our sponsors. Without your Snowy Owl from Saugeen Shores on-going interest and support we couldn't continue with arrived with a broken wing. our work. "Owl" of us here thank you for giving a 'hoot'. Now in release training. Page 2 Spring = Babies You cannot have a spring newsletter and not talk about cute fuzzy BABIES!!! The Owl Foundation is unique in that we have captive resident wild owls with all the On- tario species represented. We are able to draw upon their mothering instincts to help us raise impressionable young owlets. This year we would like to give a big hoot out to three fabulous Mommies and one super Dad; Big Red, a Great Horned Owl; Pearl, an Eastern Screech Owl; Jenny, a Barred Owl; and Wawa, a Great Horned Owl fos- ter dad. Baby season always starts with Great Horned Owls. They are the first owl spe- cies to nest in Ontario. We had a bit of a delayed start this season and Big Red wasn’t initially keen on the parenting idea when the first orphan arrived. She had not yet gone to nest and laid her own eggs First ophan admission of the year - a Great Horned Owlet (which helps to get her in the mood). We were impressed when she took on one after another, after another...and then one more. Big Red had her wings full at one point with eight little fuzz balls. Usually we try and cap her at six but she didn’t hesitate and seemed unfazed with her large brood of nestlings. Luckily a few were close to branching out so she didn’t have eight owlets all clambering for her attention for very long. In less than a week we were able to take her three oldest and move them in with Wawa. Wawa didn't take long in showing his protec- tive instincts. Pearl our Screech Owl was more easily convinced as she was already in the mood. She was happy with her little addition, quickly taking him under her body. We check in on her owlet more frequently as he came in with a fractured wing. She keeps him so covered that it is hard to even see that he is there. His wing bones are mending but only time will tell if the fracture has affected how the bone will grow and develop. Next to be of assistance is Jenny, who has been with us since 1997, making her over 22 years of age (she was admitted as an adult owl). Over the years she has helped raise 16 Wawa with two branching owlets owlets. However the last time her mothering Page 3 love was required was back in 2012. Orphaned Barred owls are not commonly found. We have had a few fledglings admitted since 2012 but those individuals were not in need of a surro- gate. They were starting their journey to inde- pendence and needed only our release condi- tioning spaces to hone their skills. When we got the call from Shades of Hope Wildlife Refuge in Pefferlaw, Ontario followed by a picture of a day old infant owlet, we were a bit concerned. Jenny had not laid her own eggs since 2016. (It is possible, considering her age, that her reproductive system is no longer active. The lifespan in captivity for Barred Owls may only be up to 30 years. Jupiter, a past resident Barred Owl that arrived as an adult was with us for 25 years. Our little Barred Owlet, like Humpty Dumpty, had had a great fall...of about 40 feet. The per- Pearl in her nesting box with orphan son who found the owlet almost stepped on it while out in the bush. Due to the nest height and location deep in the bush, it made the attempt to put it back up in the tree nearly impossible. The owlet arrived hypothermic. The little guy had to stay inside under heat as we couldn’t be sure that Jenny would enter her nest and care for the owlet. We also wanted to carefully monitor his digestion, the fall could have caused some inter- nal damage. As soon as this little guy was able to start keeping himself warm without the addi- tional heat we placed him in Jenny’s nest box. As his contact calls were not quite loud enough, we used a cell phone to play recorded calls in the box. We hoped to entice Jenny to go investigate. Unfortunately she wasn’t convinced it was her re- sponsibility though she was certainly curious as to why baby calls were coming from her box. By the end of the day, (not to worry, we were feeding the owlet at regular intervals and keeping a close eye) with the cooling night temperatures he was brought back inside. A second attempt was made a few days later. This time there was a big difference in his ability to project his calls, no phone was needed. We placed him back in the nesting box. Just as we were prepared to go up the ladder and feed him inside the nest box, lo and behold, who comes flying out of the box? Jenny! We quickly left the area. We hoped she would return to the box and eureka...success. By end of day, Jenny was in full Mom mode, she was feeding him and keeping Newly hatched Barred Owl, note egg tooth him warm. She just couldn't resist his cuteness. Page 4 Barred Owl Admission Numbers Up The Owl Foundation has been in operation for over 40 years. During this time we have maintained records for the species that have been admitted, their injury details, and their outcomes. This information can be useful in many ways. It can tell us the most common reason for admission within an owl species. We can analyze the numbers and look for patterns. Is one species more at risk than another for specific injury types? Is one group more susceptible to window strikes than another? When comparing admission numbers by species, is there a pattern that is cyclical? Many answers to these questions are simply theories or inferences and more data would be needed but it does make for interesting conversations and can lead to potential future studies. In our May 2018 newsletter we talked about Snowy Owl admissions being unusually high and that Snowy Owl movements into Southern Ontario had become more frequent and less “cyclical”. At the time the article was written we were at 21 Snowy Owl admissions. At the close of 2018 we numbered 32. Adult Barred Owl This past fall, winter and spring we saw an increase in Barred Owl admissions.
Recommended publications
  • Tc & Forward & Owls-I-IX
    USDA Forest Service 1997 General Technical Report NC-190 Biology and Conservation of Owls of the Northern Hemisphere Second International Symposium February 5-9, 1997 Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Editors: James R. Duncan, Zoologist, Manitoba Conservation Data Centre Wildlife Branch, Manitoba Department of Natural Resources Box 24, 200 Saulteaux Crescent Winnipeg, MB CANADA R3J 3W3 <[email protected]> David H. Johnson, Wildlife Ecologist Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, WA, USA 98501-1091 <[email protected]> Thomas H. Nicholls, retired formerly Project Leader and Research Plant Pathologist and Wildlife Biologist USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station 1992 Folwell Avenue St. Paul, MN, USA 55108-6148 <[email protected]> I 2nd Owl Symposium SPONSORS: (Listing of all symposium and publication sponsors, e.g., those donating $$) 1987 International Owl Symposium Fund; Jack Israel Schrieber Memorial Trust c/o Zoological Society of Manitoba; Lady Grayl Fund; Manitoba Hydro; Manitoba Natural Resources; Manitoba Naturalists Society; Manitoba Critical Wildlife Habitat Program; Metro Propane Ltd.; Pine Falls Paper Company; Raptor Research Foundation; Raptor Education Group, Inc.; Raptor Research Center of Boise State University, Boise, Idaho; Repap Manitoba; Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada; USDI Bureau of Land Management; USDI Fish and Wildlife Service; USDA Forest Service, including the North Central Forest Experiment Station; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; The Wildlife Society - Washington Chapter; Wildlife Habitat Canada; Robert Bateman; Lawrence Blus; Nancy Claflin; Richard Clark; James Duncan; Bob Gehlert; Marge Gibson; Mary Houston; Stuart Houston; Edgar Jones; Katherine McKeever; Robert Nero; Glenn Proudfoot; Catherine Rich; Spencer Sealy; Mark Sobchuk; Tom Sproat; Peter Stacey; and Catherine Thexton.
    [Show full text]
  • About Owls By: AV
    All About Owls By: AV 1 Contents 1. Say Hi To Owls_________________________ p. 3 2. Body Parts_____________________________ p. 4-5 3. Getting Hungry__________________________ p.6-7 4. So Many Owls__________________________ p.8-11 5. Where Are They_________________________ p. 12 6. Got To Go, Bye__________________________ p. 13 7. Quiz Zone______________________________ p. 14 8. About The Author________________________ p. 15 9. Glossary_______________________________ p. 16 10. References___________________________ p.17 2 Say Hi To Owls Swoosh! The great grey owl soares overhead seeking for some food. Then swoosh the owl spots a little mouse crawling through the grass and strikes at it. In this book I will teach you all about owls. If you don’t know what an owl is then this book will be good for you. In this book you will learn about their body parts, what they eat, and the types of owls. I hope you enjoy this book. 3 Body Parts Owls have way more body parts than you think. If you look to the right you will see a picture of all their body parts. But some of their most important body parts are their eyes witch help them see in the dark, their huge ears which help them hear very well, and their flexible necks. 4 Great Big Eyes Huge ears Owls have big eyes. For example, if you Owls have huge ears. Teacher fox says, open your mouth into an O shape that is the “if you lift up the feathers you can see the size of an owls eye. Owls can use those eyes back of their eyes through the ear.” That is to see in the dark.
    [Show full text]
  • OWLS and COYOTES
    AT HOME WITH NATURE: eLearning Resource | Suggested for: general audiences, families OWLS and COYOTES The Eastern Coyote The Eastern coyote, common to the Greater Toronto Area, is a hybrid between the Western coyote and Eastern wolf. Adults typically weigh between 10–22 kg, but thick fur makes them appear bigger. They have grey and reddish-brown fur, lighter underparts, a pointed nose with a red-brown top, a grey patch between the eyes, and a bushy, black-tipped tail. Coyote ears are more triangular than a wolf’s. Coyotes are not pack animals, but a mother will stay with her young until they are about one year old. Coyotes communicate with a range of sounds including yaps, whines, barks, and howls. Habitat Eastern coyotes are very adaptable and can survive in both rural and urban habitats. They often build their dens in old woodchuck holes, which they expand to about 30 cm in diameter and about 3 m in depth. Although less common, coyotes also build dens in hollow trees. Diet What is on the menu for coyotes? Check off each food type. Squirrels Frogs Grasshoppers Dog kibble Berries Rats Humans Food compost Garden vegetables Snakes Small birds Deer If you selected everything, except for humans, you are correct! Coyotes are opportunistic feeders that consume a variety of foods including fallen fruit, seeds, crops, and where they can find it pet food and compost. However, their diet is comprised mainly of insects, reptiles, amphibians, and small mammals. Their natural rodent control is beneficial to city dwellers and farmers alike. Preying on small mammals does mean though that our pets are on the menu, so it is important to keep them on leash close to you.
    [Show full text]
  • Owls.1. Newton, I. 2002. Population Limitation in Holarctic Owls. Pp. 3-29
    Owls.1. Newton, I. 2002. Population limitation in Holarctic Owls. Pp. 3-29 in ‘Ecology and conservation of owls’, ed. I. Newton, R. Kavenagh, J. Olsen & I. Taylor. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia. POPULATION LIMITATION IN HOLARCTIC OWLS IAN NEWTON Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Monks Wood, Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire PE28 2LS, United Kingdom. This paper presents an appraisal of research findings on the population dynamics, reproduction and survival of those Holarctic Owl species that feed on cyclically-fluctuating rodents or lagomorphs. In many regions, voles and lemmings fluctuate on an approximate 3–5 year cycle, but peaks occur in different years in different regions, whereas Snowshoe Hares Lepus americanus fluctuate on an approximate 10-year cycle, but peaks tend to be synchronised across the whole of boreal North America. Owls show two main responses to fluctuations in their prey supply. Resident species stay on their territories continuously, but turn to alternative prey when rodents (or lagomorphs) are scarce. They survive and breed less well in low than high rodent (or lagomorph) years. This produces a lag in response, so that years of high owl densities follow years of high prey densities (examples: Barn Owl Tyto alba, Tawny Owl Strix aluco, Ural Owl S. uralensis). In contrast, preyspecific nomadic species can breed in different areas in different years, wherever prey are plentiful. They thus respond more or less immediately by movement to change in prey-supply, so that their local densities can match the local food-supply at the time, with minimum lag (examples: Short-eared Owl: Asio flammeus, Long-eared Owl A.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Report Sex-Specific Diet Analysis of the Eurasian Eagle Owl in Finland
    Ornis Fennica 91:195–200. 2014 Brief report Sex-specific diet analysis of the Eurasian Eagle Owl in Finland Heimo Mikkola* & Risto Tornberg H. Mikkola, Department of Biology, University of Eastern Finland, P.O.Box 1627, FI- 70211 Kuopio, Finland. * Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected] R. Tornberg, Department of Biology, P.O.Box 3000, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Fin- land Received 28 March 2014, accepted 17 June 2014 1. Introduction the smaller male that is mainly responsible for prey deliveries during the breeding season. Based on Birds of prey typically show reversed sexual size specimens found in good condition at the Zoologi- dimorphism (RSD), with females clearly larger cal museum of University of Oulu, Finland, fe- than males, for what purpose has aroused a pleth- male owls from Finland had an average weight of ora of hypothesis to explain it (see Krüger 2005). 2760 g (N = 50), while male weights averaged One of the earliest explanations has been avoid- 2200 g (N = 35). The RSD index of the Eagle Owls ance of competition between the mates (Temeles is 9.8 (calculated as in Amadon (1943) and Earhart 1985). Though avoidance of competition does not & Johnson (1970) by using the cube root of body explain the reversed nature of the sizes of the sexes mass to compare the indices of linear measure- it may be one mechanism to maintain it (Sunde et ments). This is the third highest value of all Euro- al. 2003, Krüger 2005). The Eurasian Eagle Owl pean owls (Mikkola 1982). It seems logical to hy- (Bubo bubo), hereafter termed Eagle Owl, is the pothesize that the heavier females may reduce in- largest owl in the world, a typical top-predator be- traspecific competition for food with males by tak- ing able to kill smaller birds of prey and owls ing larger prey than their smaller mates.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Protocol for the Great Grey Owl Within the Range of the Northwest Forest Plan
    SURVEY PROTOCOL FOR THE GREAT GRAY OWL WITHIN THE RANGE OF THE NORTHWEST FOREST PLAN Version 3.0 January 12, 2004 Prepared for the USDA Forest Service and USDI Bureau of Land Management By Deborah L. Quintana-Coyer-Taxon Leader -USFS Richard P. Gerhardt- Taxon Expert-Sage Science Matthew D. Broyles-Team Member-BLM Jeffrey A. Dillon-Team Member-USFWS Cheryl A. Friesen-Team Member-USFS Steven A. Godwin -Team Member-BLM Shane D. Kamrath-Team Member-USFS And with editorial assistance from Kimberly L. Garvey-USFS Survey Protocol for the Great Grey Owl within the Range of the Northwest Forest Plan 1 Survey Protocol for the Great Grey Owl within the Range of the Northwest Forest Plan Table of Contents Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 I. TRIGGERS FOR SURVEY 7 Trigger Criteria 7 Activities that are not generally habitat-disturbing 7 Activities that are generally habitat-disturbing 7 II. SPECIES DESCRIPTION 8 III. ECOLOGY 9 Range 9 General Ecology 9 Ecological Differences 10 Diet 10 Breeding/Courtship 11 Habitat Use 11 Nest Structure 12 Nesting Habitat 12 Roosting Habitat 14 Foraging Habitat 14 Elevation Use 16 Wintering Habitat 16 Areas Where Pre-Disturbance Surveys are NOT Needed for a Reasonable 16 Assurance of Persistence IV. METHODS 17 Survey Period 17 Pre-Survey Planning 18 Calling Techniques 19 Recommended Equipment Specifications 19 Conducting Surveys 20 Follow-up Surveys 22 Requirements 23 Determining a Known Site 24 Determining Other Observations 24 StatusBaiting or “Mousing” 24 Data Management 25 Training/Qualifications 25 V. APPENDICES 27 Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in the Study of Irruptive Migration
    Advances in the study of irruptive migration Ian Newton1 Newton I. 2006. Advances in the study of irruptive migration. Ardea 94(3): 433–460. This paper discusses the movement patterns of two groups of birds which are generally regarded as irruptive migrants, namely (a) boreal finches and others that depend on fluctuating tree-fruit crops, and (b) owls and others that depend on cyclically fluctuating rodent popula- tions. Both groups specialise on food supplies which, in particular regions, fluctuate more than 100-fold from year to year. However, seed- crops in widely separated regions may fluctuate independently of one another, as may rodent populations, so that poor food supplies in one region may coincide with good supplies in another. If individuals are to have access to rich food supplies every year, they must often move hun- dreds or thousands of kilometres from one breeding area to another. In years of widespread food shortage (or high numbers relative to food supplies) extending over many thousands or millions of square kilome- tres, large numbers of individuals migrate to lower latitudes, as an ‘irruptive migration’. For these reasons, the distribution of the popula- tion, in both summer and winter, varies greatly from year to year. In irruptive migrants, in contrast to regular migrants, site fidelity is poor, and few individuals return to the same breeding areas in succes- sive years (apart from owls in the increase phase of the cycle). Moreover, ring recoveries and radio-tracking confirm that the same indi- viduals can breed in different years in areas separated by hundreds or thousands of kilometres.
    [Show full text]
  • FEATURED PHOTO Great Gray Owls Nesting in Fresno County, California David E
    FEATURED PHOTO Great GRAY OWLS NESTING IN FRESNO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DAVID E. QUADY, 39 The Crescent, Berkeley, California 94708; [email protected] At two meetings in June 1772 of the Royal Society in London, Johann Reinhold Forster described the specimens of birds, fishes, and mammals that Hudson’s Bay Company naturalists had collected and sent to England on their summer 1771 trade ships (Houston et al. 2003). Among them were five birds new to science. Andrew Graham, the factor at Severn River, provided most of these, including a specimen and accompanying notes that enabled Forster (1772) to describe a “fine non-descript [i.e., undescribed] owl,” which he named the Grey Owl, Strix nebulosa. The other four were the birds we now know as the Eskimo Curlew (Numenius borealis), Boreal Chickadee (Poecile hudsonicus), Blackpoll Warbler (Dendroica striata), and White- crowned Sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys). Status and Distribution Two subspecies of the holarctic Great Gray Owl have long been recognized. Strix n. lapponica breeds across Eurasia from northern Scandinavia east through northern Siberia and south to central European Russia, northern Mongolia, northern Manchu- ria, Amurland, and Sakhalin (Holt et al. 1999). In comparison to nebulosa it is slightly smaller in body mass and wing length, slightly paler, and more prominently streaked below (Bull and Duncan 1993). Nominate nebulosa breeds in North America from central Alaska east through the boreal forest of Canada and south locally in the interior to the mountains of north- central Washington, south-central Oregon, California to the southern Sierra Nevada, northern Idaho, western Montana, western Wyoming, southwestern and central Alberta, central Saskatchewan, southern Manitoba, northern Minnesota, northern Wisconsin, northern Michigan (casually), and south-central Ontario (AOU 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Four American Black Bear Patients Recovering at AIWC This Summer by J
    Recovery Review Quarterly Bulletin of the Alberta Institute for Wildlife Conservation Vol. 28 / Issue 3 / Summer 2021 Four American Black Bear Patients Recovering at AIWC this Summer By J. Kaiser AIWC first began rehabilitating black bear cubs in 2002, back when we were known as Rocky View Wildlife Recovery (we changed our name in 2004). AIWC cared for bears until 2010 when the province ceased allowing the rehabilitation of black bear cubs. Then, when the province reinstated black bear cub rehabilitation in 2018, AIWC received our permit in 2019 to continue providing care for black bear cubs in need. Since then, we are proud to report a 100% success rate in our black bear cub rehabilitation program. This spring and summer, AIWC has admitted a record number of black bear cubs, with four patients currently receiving care. The first two patients, twin sisters, were admitted at the end of May from the Grande Cache area after their mother was killed. Upon admission, they were thin and malnourished, but had healthy appetites. They were moved to an outdoor enclosure in early June and enjoy Our orphaned female black bear cub patients exploring and playing on the climbing structures. A third female black bear cub patient originally found in the Fort McMurray area and was brought to AIWC in early June via Alberta Environment and Parks (Fish and Wildlife), also orphaned. Our fourth black bear cub patient was also admitted in early June, after being observed alone with no mother around for several days in an area west of Edmonton. He was thin and dehydrated, but was eating very well from the start.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaja & Mikkola-33-37
    Albinism in the Great Gray Owl (Strix nebulosa) and Other Owls Pentti Alaja and Heimo Mikkola1 Abstract.—An incomplete albino Great Gray Owl (Strix nebulosa) was observed in Vesanto and Kajaani, Finland, 1994-1995. The literature pertaining to albinism in owls indicates that total and incomplete albinism has only been reported in 13 different owl species, the Great Gray Owl being the only species with more than five records. Thus six to seven incomplete albino Great Grays have been recorded since 1980 in Canada, Finland, and the United States. ___________________ It would seem that most animals produce Partial albinism may result from injury, physio- occasional albinos; some species do so quite logical disorder, diet, or circulatory problems. frequently whilst this phenomenon is much This type of albinism is most frequently rarer in others. Although albinism in most observed. It is important to note that white avian families is frequently recorded, we know plumage is not necessarily proof of albinism. of very few abnormally white owls. Thus the motive of this paper is to assemble as complete Adult Snowy Owls (Nyctea scandiaca) are a record as possible of white or light color primarily white, but have their feather color mutations of owls which exist or have been derived from a schemochrome feather structure recorded. which possesses little or no pigment. Light reflects within the feather structure and GENETICS OF ALBINISM produces the white coloration (Holt et al. 1995). Albinism is derived from a recessive gene which ALBINISM IN THE GREAT GRAY OWLS inhibits the enzyme tyrosinase. Tyrosine, an amino acid, synthesizes the melanin that is the An extremely light and large Great Gray Owl basis of many avian colors (Holt et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2016 Year in Review Sam Woods/Tropical Birding Tours
    2016 Year in Review Sam Woods/Tropical Birding Tours (British, living in Quito Ecuador) [email protected] (All Photos were taken by Sam Woods during this year, and are indicated in RED). The year largely featured birds seen while on tour, guiding for Tropical Birding, save for some short, personal trips, (like Yellowstone). I managed to cover 5 continents, 10 countries, and was lucky to get over 1900 birds in doing so, while not aiming for a number! My avian year opened with back-to-back Asian tours… Starting with Sri Lanka in January, on the former “Ceylon”, all island endemics were seen, (34 species), with highlights being exceptional views of the trickiest endemic, Sri Lanka Thrush, a recent split; and a day-roosting, bright ginger Serendib Scops-Owl. Among the non-endemics, a particularly confiding White-naped Woodpecker stood out, as did my very first Sloth Bear! Sri Lanka Thrush Sinharaja, SRI LANKA (January) In February I was fortunate to visit Japan for the first time, covering the main islands of Honshu, Hokkaido, and Kyushu, and also the tiny island of Myakejima while undergoing a short pelagic, which featured the much wanted Short-tailed Albatross. Wintertime Japan is about big and spectacular birds, and my personal highlights were seeing of the largest owls on Earth - Blakiston’s Fish-Owl fishing at night; watching hundreds of Steller’s Sea-Eagles in Rausu Harbour; and an incredible day bookended by vagrants - ghostly white Siberian Crane at the start, and a male Scaly-breasted Merganser at the end. Cranes were an overall memory of Japan, with 6 species seen, including both the regal Red-crowned Crane, and less predictably beautiful White-naped Crane.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Sightings from the Williams Lake Area
    The MUSKRAT EXPRESS JANUARY 15TH, 2015 The newsletter for the: Williams Lake Field Naturalists 1305A Borland Road, Williams Lake BC, V2G 5K5 Membership fees: Family ($30), single ($25) or student ($10) memberships can be mailed to the above address. Please complete the membership and waiver forms available at the Nature Centre (250) 398-8532, [email protected] or the web site below. For more information about the club please contact Fred McMechan at 392-7680 or e-mail [email protected] Williams Lake Field Naturalists Website http://www.williamslakefieldnaturalists.ca Scout Island Nature Centre Website http://www.scoutislandnaturecentre.ca Executive of The Williams Lake Field Naturalists: president Fred McMechan, secretary Ordell Steen, treasurer Katharine VanSpall and directors Nola Daintith, Cathy Koot, Peter Opie, Ray Hornby, Brian Chapman, Don Lawrence and Christie Mayall Editors: Thanks to all of you who have contributed to this edition of the newsletter. Please expect your next edition of the newsletter in late February. If you have comments, suggestions or articles for the Muskrat Express please contact Margaret Waring (398-7724), Jim Sims (296-3638) or e-mail us at [email protected] Wolf Research in the Chilcotin Wednesday, Jan.21 7:00pm Scout Island Nature Centre Info: 398-8532 Join us to hear how Wolf Awareness International researcher Sadie Parr investigates the diet and feeding ecology of these essential top predators. Are wolves responsible for recent cattle, moose and horse declines? How can we best use limited conservation resources to prevent livestock and wildlife predation? Wolf Awareness International is currently engaged in a Wolf Feeding Ecology Study in the Nemiah-Brittany Triangle area, in cooperation with the Xeni Gwet'ín community, Valhalla Wilderness Society and Friends of the Nemaiah Valley, in order to inform planning, management and conservation decisions and to facilitate coexistence between wolves and their human neighbours.
    [Show full text]