DOCSLIB.ORG

EEI's 'Transmission Projects

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EEI's 'Transmission Projects Transmission Projects: At A Glance Prepared by: Edison Electric Institute MARCH 2012 © 2012 by the Edison Electric Institute (EEI). All rights reserved. Published 2012. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system or method, now known or hereinafter invented or adopted, without the express prior written permission of the Edison Electric Institute. Attribution Notice and Disclaimer This work was prepared by the Edison Electric Institute (EEI). When used as a reference, attribution to EEI is requested. EEI, any member of EEI, and any person acting on their behalf (a) does not make any warranty, express or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of the information, advice or recommendations contained in this work, and (b) does not assume and expressly disclaims any liability with respect to the use of, or for damages resulting from the use of any information, advice or recommendations contained in this work. The views and opinions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect those of EEI or any member of EEI. This material and its production, reproduction and distribution by EEI does not imply endorsement of the material. Note: The status of the projects listed in this report was current when submitted to EEI but may have since changed between the time information was initially submitted and date this report was published. Published by: Edison Electric Institute 701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004-2696 Phone: 202-508-5000 Web site: www.eei.org EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This sixth annual publication of EEI’s Transmission Projects: At A Glance report showcases a cross-section of transmission projects that EEI’s members completed, or expected to complete, in 2011, have planned for the next ten years, and highlights EEI members’ continuing focus on needed transmission investment. This report is not a comprehensive compilation of all projects that are being undertaken by EEI’s members, but the sampling of projects described captures a wide variety of project types currently under construction or planned. Investing in Needed Transmission In response to various needs, such as reliability and generator interconnection, investment in our nation’s transmission infrastructure has increased over the past several years. The increasing demands for new transmission and system upgrades will continue to drive transmission investment in the long-term. However, near-term planned transmission investment is impacted by current economic conditions indicated by lower rate of demand growth. Coupled with the recent completion and/or delay of major transmission projects, EEI currently projects a flattening or possible decrease in transmission investment through 2014, as compared to the projected 2012 level. Nevertheless, these projected 2011-2014 figures are significantly higher than the actual 2010 transmission investment level, and are a sign of a continuing increase in transmission investment by EEI’s members. As explained below, the ability of EEI members to make transmission investments that are beneficial to customers is supported by effective Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) policies. EEI member companies’ are also continuing their efforts to modernize the transmission system through individual funding and the use of Smart Grid Investment Grants (“SGIGs”) for certain projects selected by the United States Department of Energy (“DOE”), which augment existing EEI member grid modernization efforts. In addition, there are emerging factors that affect transmission investment, including recent United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) requirements on generation resources. EEI members’ investment in needed transmission is significant and reflects a commitment to reliability, preparation for future customer needs and public policy objectives. From 2001-2010, EEI members invested approximately $77 billion in transmission infrastructure enhancements to meet these needs.1 Over 100 transmission projects are highlighted in this report, totaling approximately $64 billion (nominal dollars) in expected future transmission system improvements from 2011 through 2022. This investment is only a portion of the total transmission investment anticipated through 2022 by EEI’s members. The Value of Transmission It is important to remember that transmission projects provide an array of benefits, including maintaining the high levels of reliable electricity service that customers expect; providing congestion relief, reducing system losses, integrating generation resources; and deploying advanced monitoring systems to enhance EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE iii TRANSMISSION PROJECTS: AT A GLANCE — ExECUTIVE SUMMARY situational awareness, regardless of the initial development intention. At the same time, all transmission projects must be properly integrated with local systems to maintain the paramount objective of reliable operation of the national grid. In accordance with FERC’s 2009-2014 Strategic Plan, transmission projects are developed “through the use of open and transparent processes that include analysis and consideration on a comparable basis of proposed solutions involving any generation, transmission, and demand resource.”2 Policies Supporting Transmission Investment Investment in needed transmission is supported, in part, by several landmark developments in federal and state policies affecting transmission infrastructure. Among these are, notably, the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (“EPAct 2005”) and federal transmission pricing policies being implemented by FERC. In recognition of the benefits of a robust transmission network, the risks of transmission development, and the challenges of raising adequate capital to invest in transmission given other capital requirements, Congress required the adoption of a new transmission pricing policy in EPAct 2005. FERC implemented this mandate in 2006, issuing its transmission incentives rate final rule. Properly balancing the benefits of transmission with the cost to ratepayers, FERC executes its incentives policy with rigorous thresholds and requires detailed demonstrations by applicants as part of the prudency review. This pricing policy is working to assist in sustaining the needed levels of investment in transmission infrastructure improvements, and the deployment of advanced technologies, which, in addition to enhancing reliability and integrating diverse generation, removes barriers to electricity trading between and among regions and markets. The transmission grid is dynamic and ever expanding to better serve electricity customers. As showcased in this report, there is a continued need for transmission investment, which presents risks and challenges that have not diminished. As mentioned above, Congress recognized these risks and challenges. FERC’s balanced and effective incentives policy aids to address these risks and challenges, and regulatory certainty is critical to assure the timely development of needed transmission. There are also new federal developments that may assist in transmission siting, one of the major challenges to expanding, upgrading and modernizing our nation’s transmission network. The DOE and nine other federal agencies, are working together with the goal of improving the overall quality and timeliness of transmission permitting and review by federal agencies.3 These efforts could not come at a more opportune time. A robust transmission system can ensure the reliability of the grid and will assist in the industry’s efforts to comply with new EPA rules, as well as additional state environmental requirements.4 Report Scope In addition to the total transmission system investment included in this year’s report, several sub-categories are broken out and discussed in greater detail: Interstate Transmission Projects, Transmission Supporting the Integration of Renewable Resources, Transmission Projects Required for System Reliability, and Transmission Projects Developed by Multiple Project Partners. Large interstate transmission projects span multiple states and account for approximately 9,500 miles of transmission representing a $42.5 billion (nominal dollars) investment and face significant challenges for siting, permitting, cost allocation and cost recovery. iv EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE TRANSMISSION PROJECTS: AT A GLANCE — ExECUTIVE SUMMARY Transmission projects needed to address the integration of renewable resources that will accommodate the expected off-peak production represent the transmission upgrades of approximately 12,000 miles with an accompanying investment of approximately $47.5 billion (nominal dollars).5 Finally, transmission projects where EEI’s members have partnered with other utilities, including non-EEI members, to leverage their expertise in building needed and beneficial transmission represent a cost of approximately $42 billion (nominal dollars). 1 The historic investment total of approximately $77 billion for the 2001 through 2010 period is in real 2010 dollars. Sources: EEI’s Annual Property & Plant Capital Investment Survey for actual transmission investment and EEI’s Electric Transmission Capital Budget & Forecast Survey for planned transmission investment. 2 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, The Strategic Plan - FY 2009-2014 at 24 (Oct. 2009) available at http://www.ferc.gov/about/strat-docs/FY-09-14- strat-plan-pringt.pdf
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2006 Annual Report on Market Issues and Performance
    Annual Report Market Issues and Performance 2006 Department of Market Monitoring California Independent System Operator Department of Market Monitoring – California ISO April 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 Overview................................................................................................................................................... 1 Total Wholesale Energy and Ancillary Service Costs ..............................................................................3 Market Rule Changes ............................................................................................................................... 4 Increase in Bid Cap for Energy and Ancillary Services........................................................................ 4 Enforcement of Amendment 72 – Load Scheduling Requirement....................................................... 5 System Resource Adequacy Requirements ........................................................................................ 6 Reliability Capacity Service Tariff (RCST) ........................................................................................... 7 Long-term Procurement Plans ............................................................................................................. 9 General Market Conditions..................................................................................................................... 10 Demand
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Planning Study Central California Clean Energy Transmission Project
    Preliminary Planning Study Central California Clean Energy Transmission Project Study Plan Version 1.2 February 29, 2008 Stakeholder Group Study 1 Table of Contents Study Objective...................................................................................................................3 Potential Alternatives ..........................................................................................................3 Alt-1: Status Quo.............................................................................................................3 Alt-2: Central California Clean Transmission Project (C3ETP).....................................3 Alt-3: Same as Alt-2, except building a Midway – E2 Single Circuit Tower Line (SCTL) ............................................................................................................................5 Alt-4: Build a Whirlwind – San Joaquin - E2 500 kV DCTL.........................................5 Alt-5: Build a Midway – E2 230 kV DCTL...................................................................5 Alt-6: Build a new PG&E and SCE Big Creek 230 kV Tie............................................6 Alt-7: Build a Midway – McCall – E2 230 kV DCTL....................................................6 Alt-8: Build a Gates – Gregg 230 kV DCTL ..................................................................6 Alt-9: Raisin City Switching Station...............................................................................7 Alt-10: New Generation..................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of High-Temperature Superconducting Power Technologies on Reliability, Power Transfer Capacity, and Energy Use
    STRENGTHENING THE GRID Effect of High-Temperature Superconducting Power Technologies on Reliability, Power Transfer Capacity, and Energy Use Richard Silberglitt Emile Ettedgui Anders Hove Science and Technology Policy Institute R Prepared for the Department of Energy The research described in this report was conducted by RAND’s Science and Technology Policy Institute for the Department of Energy under contract ENG- 9812731. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Silberglitt, R. S. (Richard S.) Strengthening the grid : effect of high temperature superconducting (HTS) power technologies on reliability, power transfer capacity, and energy use / Richard Silberglitt, Emile Ettedgui, and Anders Hove. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. “MR-1531.” ISBN 0-8330-3173-2 1. Electric power systems—Materials. 2. Electric power systems—Reliability. 3. High temperature superconductors. I. Ettedgui, Emile. II. Hove, Anders. III.Title. TK1005 .S496 2002 621.31—dc21 2002021398 RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND® is a registered trademark. RAND’s pub- lications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. Cover illustration by Stephen Bloodsworth © Copyright 2002 RAND All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from RAND. Published 2002 by RAND 1700 Main Street,
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2017 Commencement Program
    TE TA UN S E ST TH AT I F E V A O O E L F A DITAT DEUS N A E R R S I O Z T S O A N Z E I A R I T G R Y A 1912 1885 ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY COMMENCEMENT AND CONVOCATION PROGRAM Fall 2017 December 11-13, 2017 THE NATIONAL ANTHEM THE STAR-SPANGLED BANNER O say can you see, by the dawn’s early light, What so proudly we hailed at the twilight’s last gleaming? Whose broad stripes and bright stars through the perilous fight O’er the ramparts we watched, were so gallantly streaming? And the rockets’ red glare, the bombs bursting in air Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there. O say does that Star-Spangled Banner yet wave O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave? ALMA MATER ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY Where the bold saguaros Raise their arms on high, Praying strength for brave tomorrows From the western sky; Where eternal mountains Kneel at sunset’s gate, Here we hail thee, Alma Mater, Arizona State. —Hopkins-Dresskell MAROON AND GOLD Fight, Devils down the field Fight with your might and don’t ever yield Long may our colors outshine all others Echo from the buttes, Give em’ hell Devils! Cheer, cheer for A-S-U! Fight for the old Maroon For it’s Hail! Hail! The gang’s all here And it’s onward to victory! Students whose names appear in this program have completed degree requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • FIGURE 4.2.4 Midway-Tehachapi 500 Kv Transmission Line
    Development Plan for the Phased Expansion of Electric Power Transmission Facilities in the Tehachapi Wind Resource Area Second Report of the Tehachapi Collaborative Study Group California Public Utilities Commission OII 05-09-005 OII 00-11-001 April 19, 2006 The report was re-printed in 2 volumes or electronic files on May 17, 2006: Volume 1 contains the Second Report; Volume 2 contains all Appendices Second Report of the Tehachapi Collaborative Study Group TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY........................................................................................................................7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................8 CHAPTER 1 ‐ INTRODUCTION .................................................................................16 1.1 Background.......................................................................................................... 16 1.2 The Tehachapi Collaborative Study Group (TCSG) ...................................... 16 1.3 The March 16, 2005 Report ................................................................................ 16 1.4 Start of Second TCSG Study.............................................................................. 17 1.5 Study Plan # 2 ..................................................................................................... 18 CHAPTER 2 ‐ PROCESS TO EVALUATE ALTERNATIVES...................................19 2.1 Introduction........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coordination of Wind and Hydro Power Plant by Using Optimization Technique
    ISSN (Online) : 2319 - 8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347 - 6710 International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization Volume 6, Special Issue 14, August 2017 Two Days National Conference on Modernization in Engineering Science (NCMES 2K17) 23rd-24th March 2017 Organized by Dept. of EEE, Sri Krishna College of Engineering & Technology, Coimbatore 641 008, Tamil Nadu, India Coordination of Wind and Hydro Power Plant by Using Optimization Technique P.Ranjithkumar1, Saravana Prabaakar1 , M.Suganya2, Niranjana B2 UG Scholar, Department of EEE, SKCET, Coimbatore-641008, Tamil Nadu, India1 Assistant Professor, Department of EEE, SKCET, Coimbatore-641008, Tamil Nadu, India2 ABSTRACT: Wind power production experiences new challenges in operation of a power system due to its variability and uncertainty of the wind. The challenges can be met when we introduce a new storage facility which was already available in the existing power system. Existing hydro power plants with larger reservoirs or pumped storage hydro power plants can be used for compensation of this drawback. It is known that wind power is an uncertain energy source compared to hydroelectric generation which is easily scheduled. In this abstract, the method for coordinating wind power plant and hydroelectric power plant is carried out by using Fourier transform technique to measure and control the state of wind and hydro power plants. Hydroelectric generation is employed as a method of energy reserve and compensation for wind power fluctuation in order to provide efficient power supply to benefit wind providers. The Fourier technique, which is generally used for relation of periodic functions like sine and cosine waves, is used here for the purpose of co-ordination.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Application of Phasor Measurement Unit in Smart Grid.Pdf
    PRATIBHA: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, SPIRITUALITY, BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY (IJSSBT), Vol. 1, No.2, FEBRUARY 2013 ISSN (Print) 2277—7261 APPLICATION OF PHASOR MEASUREMENT UNIT IN SMART GRID 1Chandarani Sutar, 2Dr. K. S. Verma 1RRSIMT Amethi (U.P.), 2KNIT Sultapur (U.P.) Email: [email protected], 2 [email protected] , Abstract-A smart Grid uses two way digital for intelligent linkages between the elements of the communication with advanced sensors to collect grid while participating in the decision making that and analyze data for transforming the existing delivers value to the utility and supply and demand electric grid into intelligent, dynamic self- entities connected to it. healing, self optimizing transmission and distribution grid . As critical grid events often II. ADVANTAGES OF SMART GRID require real-time recognition and real time i) Enables active participation by of consumers by response .A smart grid uses IP-based ,open providing choices and incentives to modify standard, intelligent communication to electricity purchasing patterns and behavior. measure real-time events such as congestion ii) Autonomous control actions to enhance ,system stability ,equipment performance, reliability by increasing resiliency against outages and demand response events . component failures and natural disasters actions. Synchrophasor measurement technology is iii) Efficiency enhancement by maximizing asset accurate and real-time monitoring with high utilization. resolution of actual system conditions in wide iv) Resiliency against malicious attacks by virtue area . of better physical and IT security protocols. The proposed methods has been verified, v) Integration of renewable resources including compared and studied using PSAT Software solar, wind, and various types of energy storage.
    [Show full text]
  • PMU)-Like Metering for Behind-The-Meter (BTM) Solar Systems Using Blockchain- Assisted Smart Inverters Preprint Abdullah A
    Secure and Cost-Effective Micro Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU)-Like Metering for Behind-the-Meter (BTM) Solar Systems Using Blockchain- Assisted Smart Inverters Preprint Abdullah A. Hadi,1 Gomanth Bere,1 Taesic Kim,1 Justin J. Ochoa,1 Jianwu Zeng,2 and Gab-Su Seo3 1 Texas A&M University-Kingsville 2 Minnesota State University 3 National Renewable Energy Laboratory Presented at the 2020 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (IEEE APEC) New Orleans, Louisiana March 15–19, 2020 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Conference Paper Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/CP-5D00-75447 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC March 2020 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Secure and Cost-Effective Micro Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU)-Like Metering for Behind-the-Meter (BTM) Solar Systems Using Blockchain- Assisted Smart Inverters Preprint Abdullah A. Hadi,1 Gomanth Bere,1 Taesic Kim,1 Justin J. Ochoa,1 Jianwu Zeng,2 and Gab-Su Seo3 1 Texas A&M University-Kingsville 2 Minnesota State University 3 National Renewable Energy Laboratory Suggested Citation Hadi, Abdullah A., Gomanth Bere, Taesic Kim, Justin J. Ochoa, Jianwu Zeng, and Gab-Su Seo. 2020. Secure and Cost-Effective Micro Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU)-Like Metering for Behind-the-Meter (BTM) Solar Systems Using Blockchain-Assisted Smart Inverters: Preprint. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/CP-5D00- 75447. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/75447.pdf. © 2020 IEEE.
    [Show full text]
  • Synchrophasor Based Islanding & Open Phase Fault Protection In
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 2-24-2020 11:00 AM Synchrophasor Based Islanding & Open phase fault Protection in Distribution Systems Mansour Jalali The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Tarlochan Sidhu The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Electrical and Computer Engineering A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © Mansour Jalali 2020 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Power and Energy Commons, and the Systems and Communications Commons Recommended Citation Jalali, Mansour, "Synchrophasor Based Islanding & Open phase fault Protection in Distribution Systems" (2020). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 6947. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/6947 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract With the rapid growth of renewable energy resources, energy efficiency initiatives, electric vehicles, energy storage, etc., distribution systems are becoming more complex such that conventional protection, control, and measurement infrastructure – typically concentrated at the main substation, with little to no access to information along the feeder – cannot maintain the reliability of the system without some sort of additional protection, control and measurement functionalities. As an example, a dedicated communication channel for carrying the transfer trip signal from the substation to the Point of Common Coupling (PCC) to prevent islanding operation of alternative resources, has been a requirement for many utilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Power Quality Monitoring Through Phasor Measurement Unit Data Interpretation
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Sep 23, 2021 Improved Power Quality Monitoring through Phasor Measurement Unit Data Interpretation Pertl, Michael; Marinelli, Mattia; Bindner, Henrik W. Published in: Proceedings of Power Engineering Conference (UPEC) 2015 Publication date: 2015 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Pertl, M., Marinelli, M., & Bindner, H. W. (2015). Improved Power Quality Monitoring through Phasor Measurement Unit Data Interpretation. In Proceedings of Power Engineering Conference (UPEC) 2015 IEEE. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Improved Power Quality Monitoring through Phasor Measurement Unit Data Interpretation Michael Pertl, Mattia Marinelli, Henrik Bindner Department of Electrical Engineering (Center for Electric Power and Energy) DTU – Technical University of Denmark Contact: [email protected] Abstract- The observability needs in future power systems will renewable generation units such as photovoltaics (PV) are change radically due to the continuing implementation of connected through power electronic devices which can lead renewable energy sources at all voltage levels.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 ENDTF Reliability Assessment Report
    System Resilience Under Extreme Natural Disaster January 8, 2020 System Resilience Under Extreme Natural Disaster Executive Summary The purpose of this assessment is to evaluate the impact of an extreme natural disaster on the reliability of the Bulk Electric System (BES) in the Western Interconnection (WI). Given that the WI experiences extreme disasters somewhat regularly, such as yearly wild fires and occasional extreme earthquakes, this assessment is designed to identify challenges to the resilience of the WI and to help transmission providers plan accordingly. The scope of this assessment includes studying the impact on WI system adequacy and system stability within a Year 10 future in an Extreme Event caused by California wild fires. This case study was inspired by California’s Tucker Wild Fire in July 2019. The assessment used WECC’s 2028 Anchor Data Set (ADS) planning cases to model a Production Cost Model (PCM) analysis using ABB’s GridView software and a Power Flow (PF) Model analysis using GE’s PSLF software. To identify a highly stressed system condition, the assessment started with the ADS 2028 PCM Phase 1 V2.2, and identified August 7, 2028, Hour 20 (08/07/2018 Hr. 20) as the hour when Path 66 (COI) and Path 65 (PDCI) were most heavily loaded, and the danger of fire was highest. The generation dispatch and load for the 08/07/2028 Hr. 20 were extracted from the 2028 ADS PCM Phase 1 V2.2 and used as input for the 2028 Heavy Summer 1 base case to create a PF case for the assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Expected Path 26 Power Flows Under High Load Conditions
    DOCKET 11-IEP-1D DATE DRAFT STAFF PAPER RECD. APR 06 2011 EXPECTED PATH 26 POWER FLOWS UNDER HIGH LOAD CONDITIONS Lynn Marshall, Marc Pryor, David Vidaver Electricity Analysis Office Electricity Supply Assessment Division California Energy Commission DISCLAIMER This paper was prepared by a member of the staff of the California Energy Commission. As such, it does not necessarily represent the MARCH 2011 views of the Energy Commission or the State of California. The Energy CEC‐200‐2011‐003‐SD Commission, the State of California, its employees, contractors, and subcontractors make no warrant, express or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this paper; nor does any party represent that the uses of this information will not infringe upon privately owned rights. This paper has not been approved or disapproved by the California Energy Commission nor has the Commission passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the information in this paper. This paper has not been approved or disapproved by the full Commission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This paper incorporates demand forecasts and related analysis prepared by Tom Gorin and Chris Kavalec of the California Energy Commission Demand Analysis Office. i ii ABSTRACT This paper updates a 2008 staff assessment of electricity flows over Path 26 during heat spells in the summers of 2006 – 2008. Path 26 is a major transmission artery connecting the Northern California portion of the California Independent System Operator (California ISO) Balancing Authority with Southern California. With an accepted north‐to‐south rating of 4,000 megawatts (MW) and a south‐to‐north rating of 3,000 MW, the path allows significant amounts of generation in one zone to be exported to serve load in the other.
    [Show full text]