DOCSLIB.ORG

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, PIANKATANK RIVER, VIRGINIA TABLE of CONTENTS 1.0 Project Purpose and Need

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, PIANKATANK RIVER, VIRGINIA TABLE of CONTENTS 1.0 Project Purpose and Need _______________________________________ FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, PIANKATANK RIVER, VIRGINIA _______________________________________ Prepared by: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Norfolk District Planning and Policy Branch Environmental Analysis March 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this document is to analyze the environmental impacts of the project identified as Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery, Piankatank River, Virginia. This restoration project is located in the lower Piankatank River at its confluence with the Chesapeake Bay. As a component of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Chesapeake Bay Oyster Restoration program, this project is authorized by Section 704(b) of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986, as amended. The ultimate goal of the program is to restore abundant, self-sustaining oyster populations in the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. The objective of this project is to construct new reef habitat and rehabilitate existing reef habitat in the Piankatank River to closely resemble natural conditions, in terms of structure and function, in a technically and economically sound manner. The project area is located in Middlesex and Mathews counties at the mouth of the Piankatank River where it discharges into the Chesapeake Bay proper. The Piankatank River is a medium-sized river located south of the Rappahannock River and north of the York River in the Middle Peninsula region of the Commonwealth of Virginia. The entire project area occurs on subaqueous land owned by the Commonwealth of Virginia and managed by the Virginia Marine Resources Commission (VMRC). The project will consist of the construction of approximately 200 acres of new oyster reef habitat in the Piankatank River between approximately 6-12 feet Mean Low Low Water (MLLW). The reef habitat would be constructed using artificial substrate materials, or a combination of the alternative substrate and shell. Alternative substrate materials used to construct the new oyster reef habitat may include stone, crushed concrete, recycled concrete, shaped concrete structures such as reef ball® type structures, pyramids, modules, and “castles,” and other materials of opportunity. Reefs would be built to an elevation of approximately one foot above existing bottom. As the non-federal sponsor, VMRC, has constructed an estimated 25 acres of new reef habitat and will rehabilitate up to approximately 30 additional acres of existing seed and sanctuary reef habitat through reshelling in the Piankatank River. An Adaptive Management and Monitoring Plan (Appendix A) describes how the results of project-specific monitoring would be used to adaptively manage the project to achieve established goals and objectives. Construction of the project will include temporary, minor impacts to air quality, water quality, the aquatic community, recreation, navigation and the level of noise experienced within the project area. It is predicted that these negative impacts will end once construction has been completed and most environmental parameters within the project area will return to pre- construction conditions. Construction of the project will result in a permanent change from soft-bottom benthic communities to reef structures; this will result in negative impacts to some sessile benthic species. However, the long-term impacts resulting from the project are predicted to be largely beneficial. The reef structures will increase habitat heterogeneity and species diversity, as well as increase the amount of reef habitat within the river. The new reef habitat will increase productivity of the system and create new habitat for prey species, such as crustaceans, mollusks, worms and fish. Hard reef structures will provide shelter and protection for many species of fish and other motile invertebrates. Other positive long-term impacts include enhancement of water quality resulting from increased oyster (and other filter feeding) populations which will have a beneficial impact on all organisms of the Piankatank River and the Chesapeake Bay. This project will be an important step in restoration of the Piankatank River, and is a significant contributor to the achievement of the goals set forth by the Chesapeake Bay 2014 Agreement to “Restore native oyster habitat and populations in 10 tributaries by 2025 and ensure their protection.” The Piankatank River is designated as a Priority tributary for restoration by the Chesapeake Bay Program’s Sustainable Fisheries Goal Implementation Team (GIT). This project also fulfills the directives of Executive Order 13508, Chesapeake Bay Protection and Restoration, signed by President Obama in 2009. ii iii iv FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, PIANKATANK RIVER, VIRGINIA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Project Purpose And Need ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Agency Goal Or Objective ................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Project Authority ................................................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Project Name ....................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Project Location .................................................................................................................................. 2 1.3.1. Restoration Site Selection Methodology..................................................................................... 4 1.4 Related Environmental Documents..................................................................................................... 6 2.0 Alternatives ............................................................................................................................................. 6 2.1 Description Of Alternatives ................................................................................................................ 6 2.1.1 Alternative A ............................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.2 Alternative B ............................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.3 Alternative C ............................................................................................................................... 8 2.1.4 Alternative D .............................................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Issues And Basis Of Choice ................................................................................................................ 9 2.3 Alternatives Eliminated From Detailed Evaluation ............................................................................ 9 2.4 Preferred Alternative ......................................................................................................................... 10 2.5 Monitoring And Adaptive Management ........................................................................................... 11 2.6 Comparison Of Alternatives ............................................................................................................. 11 3.0 Affected Environment ........................................................................................................................... 17 3.1 General Environmental Effects ......................................................................................................... 17 3.1.1 Physical Setting ......................................................................................................................... 17 3.1.2 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................. 17 3.1.3 Water Quality ............................................................................................................................ 18 3.1.4 Climate Change ......................................................................................................................... 20 3.2 Environmental Resources ................................................................................................................. 21 3.2.1 Wildlife Resources .................................................................................................................... 21 3.2.1.1 Benthic Community ...................................................................................................... 21 3.2.1.2 Fish ............................................................................................................................... 22 3.2.1.3 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species ................................................................... 22 3.2.1.4 Invasive Species............................................................................................................ 26 3.2.2 Habitat Resources ..................................................................................................................... 26 3.2.2.1 Oyster Resources .......................................................................................................... 26 3.2.2.2 Essential Fish Habitat ................................................................................................... 29 3.2.2.3 Submerged Aquatic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Turbidity Criterion for the Protection of Coral Reef and Hardbottom Communities
    DRAFT Implementation of the Turbidity Criterion for the Protection of Coral Reef and Hardbottom Communities Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration Florida Department of Environmental Protection October 2020 Contents Section 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose of Document .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background Information ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Proposed Criterion and Rule Language .............................................................................................. 2 1.4 Threatened and Endangered Species Considerations .......................................................................... 5 1.5 Outstanding Florida Waters (OFW) Considerations ........................................................................... 5 1.6 Natural Factors Influencing Background Turbidity Levels ................................................................ 7 Section 2. Implementation in Permitting ..................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Permitting Information ........................................................................................................................ 8 2.2 Establishing Baseline (Pre-project) Levels ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spectacular Summer Decoy Auction Sunday & Monday, July 28 - 29, 2013 Cape Codder Resort and Hotel • Hyannis, MA Phone: (888) 297-2200
    Ted and Judy Harmon present: Spectacular Summer Decoy Auction Sunday & Monday, July 28 - 29, 2013 Cape Codder Resort and Hotel • Hyannis, MA Phone: (888) 297-2200 Preview: Saturday, July 27, 6-9 pm • Sunday, July 28, 9-11 am • Monday, July 29, 8-10 am Sale: Sunday, July 28, 11 am • Monday, July 29, 10 am www.decoysunlimitedinc.net e-mail: [email protected] TERMINOLOGY: XOP - Excellent Original Paint XOC - Excellent Original Condition OP - Original Paint T/U - Touch Up For alternative or phone bidding please call Ted Harmon at (508) 362-2766 For more information contact: Ted Harmon, P.O. Box 206, West Barnstable, MA 02668 • (508) 362-2766 See conditions of sale on back of catalog. 1 Reflections Ted and Judy Harmon It’s been quite a year. There were lots of speed bumps in the road but here I am once again with a number of nice decoys to fit every pocketbook thanks to a lot of help from family, some very good friends and loyal consignors. Due to health problems I was unable to attend the Mid-West Decoy Collector’s Show for the first time in 40 years. Thanks to Bill LaPointe and Jim King for attending the show for me and exhibiting the decoys. There is absolutely no way I could have pulled this together without family and friends. If I may use a baseball analogy, it really came down to the last of the ninth, two outs and the count at three and two before we managed to scratch out a hit and round out the offerings.
    [Show full text]
  • National Primary Drinking Water Regulations
    National Primary Drinking Water Regulations Potential health effects MCL or TT1 Common sources of contaminant in Public Health Contaminant from long-term3 exposure (mg/L)2 drinking water Goal (mg/L)2 above the MCL Nervous system or blood Added to water during sewage/ Acrylamide TT4 problems; increased risk of cancer wastewater treatment zero Eye, liver, kidney, or spleen Runoff from herbicide used on row Alachlor 0.002 problems; anemia; increased risk crops zero of cancer Erosion of natural deposits of certain 15 picocuries Alpha/photon minerals that are radioactive and per Liter Increased risk of cancer emitters may emit a form of radiation known zero (pCi/L) as alpha radiation Discharge from petroleum refineries; Increase in blood cholesterol; Antimony 0.006 fire retardants; ceramics; electronics; decrease in blood sugar 0.006 solder Skin damage or problems with Erosion of natural deposits; runoff Arsenic 0.010 circulatory systems, and may have from orchards; runoff from glass & 0 increased risk of getting cancer electronics production wastes Asbestos 7 million Increased risk of developing Decay of asbestos cement in water (fibers >10 fibers per Liter benign intestinal polyps mains; erosion of natural deposits 7 MFL micrometers) (MFL) Cardiovascular system or Runoff from herbicide used on row Atrazine 0.003 reproductive problems crops 0.003 Discharge of drilling wastes; discharge Barium 2 Increase in blood pressure from metal refineries; erosion 2 of natural deposits Anemia; decrease in blood Discharge from factories; leaching Benzene
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Impacts on Net Primary Production (NPP) And
    Biogeosciences, 13, 5151–5170, 2016 www.biogeosciences.net/13/5151/2016/ doi:10.5194/bg-13-5151-2016 © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Climate change impacts on net primary production (NPP) and export production (EP) regulated by increasing stratification and phytoplankton community structure in the CMIP5 models Weiwei Fu, James T. Randerson, and J. Keith Moore Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, California, 92697, USA Correspondence to: Weiwei Fu ([email protected]) Received: 16 June 2015 – Published in Biogeosciences Discuss.: 12 August 2015 Revised: 10 July 2016 – Accepted: 3 August 2016 – Published: 16 September 2016 Abstract. We examine climate change impacts on net pri- the models. Community structure is represented simply in mary production (NPP) and export production (sinking par- the CMIP5 models, and should be expanded to better cap- ticulate flux; EP) with simulations from nine Earth sys- ture the spatial patterns and climate-driven changes in export tem models (ESMs) performed in the framework of the efficiency. fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). Global NPP and EP are reduced by the end of the century for the intense warming scenario of Representa- tive Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5. Relative to the 1990s, 1 Introduction NPP in the 2090s is reduced by 2–16 % and EP by 7–18 %. The models with the largest increases in stratification (and Ocean net primary production (NPP) and particulate or- largest relative declines in NPP and EP) also show the largest ganic carbon export (EP) are key elements of marine bio- positive biases in stratification for the contemporary period, geochemistry that are vulnerable to ongoing climate change suggesting overestimation of climate change impacts on NPP from rising concentrations of atmospheric CO2 and other and EP.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Turbidity Currents Using Seismic Oceanography Title Page Abstract Introduction 1 2 E
    Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Ocean Sci. Discuss., 8, 1803–1818, 2011 www.ocean-sci-discuss.net/8/1803/2011/ Ocean Science doi:10.5194/osd-8-1803-2011 Discussions OSD © Author(s) 2011. CC Attribution 3.0 License. 8, 1803–1818, 2011 This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Ocean Science (OS). Mapping turbidity Please refer to the corresponding final paper in OS if available. currents using seismic E. A. Vsemirnova and R. W. Hobbs Mapping turbidity currents using seismic oceanography Title Page Abstract Introduction 1 2 E. A. Vsemirnova and R. W. Hobbs Conclusions References 1Geospatial Research Ltd, Department of Earth Sciences, Tables Figures Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK 2Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK J I Received: 25 May 2011 – Accepted: 12 August 2011 – Published: 18 August 2011 J I Correspondence to: R. W. Hobbs ([email protected]) Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. Back Close Full Screen / Esc Printer-friendly Version Interactive Discussion 1803 Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Abstract OSD Using a combination of seismic oceanographic and physical oceanographic data ac- quired across the Faroe-Shetland Channel we present evidence of a turbidity current 8, 1803–1818, 2011 that transports suspended sediment along the western boundary of the Channel. We 5 focus on reflections observed on seismic data close to the sea-bed on the Faroese Mapping turbidity side of the Channel below 900m. Forward modelling based on independent physi- currents using cal oceanographic data show that thermohaline structure does not explain these near seismic sea-bed reflections but they are consistent with optical backscatter data, dry matter concentrations from water samples and from seabed sediment traps.
    [Show full text]
  • New York State Artificial Reef Plan and Generic Environmental Impact
    TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................... vi 1. INTRODUCTION .......................1 2. MANAGEMENT ENVIRONMENT ..................4 2.1. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE. ..............4 2.2. LOCATION. .....................7 2.3. NATURAL RESOURCES. .................7 2.3.1 Physical Characteristics. ..........7 2.3.2 Living Resources. ............. 11 2.4. HUMAN RESOURCES. ................. 14 2.4.1 Fisheries. ................. 14 2.4.2 Archaeological Resources. ......... 17 2.4.3 Sand and Gravel Mining. .......... 18 2.4.4 Marine Disposal of Waste. ......... 18 2.4.5 Navigation. ................ 18 2.5. ARTIFICIAL REEF RESOURCES. ............ 20 3. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES .................. 26 3.1 GOALS ....................... 26 3.2 OBJECTIVES .................... 26 4. POLICY ......................... 28 4.1 PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION .............. 28 4.1.1 Permits. .................. 29 4.1.2 Materials Donations and Acquisitions. ... 31 4.1.3 Citizen Participation. ........... 33 4.1.4 Liability. ................. 35 4.1.5 Intra/Interagency Coordination. ...... 36 4.1.6 Program Costs and Funding. ......... 38 4.1.7 Research. ................. 40 4.2 DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES .............. 44 4.2.1 Siting. .................. 44 4.2.2 Materials. ................. 55 4.2.3 Design. .................. 63 4.3 MANAGEMENT .................... 70 4.3.1 Monitoring. ................ 70 4.3.2 Maintenance. ................ 72 4.3.3 Reefs in the Exclusive Economic Zone. ... 74 4.3.4 Special Management Concerns. ........ 76 4.3.41 Estuarine reefs. ........... 76 4.3.42 Mitigation. ............. 77 4.3.43 Fish aggregating devices. ...... 80 i 4.3.44 User group conflicts. ........ 82 4.3.45 Illegal and destructive practices. .. 85 4.4 PLAN REVIEW .................... 88 5. ACTIONS ........................ 89 5.1 ADMINISTRATION .................. 89 5.2 RESEARCH ..................... 89 5.3 DEVELOPMENT .................... 91 5.4 MANAGEMENT .................... 96 6. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ................. 97 6.1 ECOSYSTEM IMPACTS.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Fishing Guide |
    Texas Commercial Fishing regulations summary 2021 2022 SEPTEMBER 1, 2021 – AUGUST 31, 2022 Subject to updates by Texas Legislature or Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission TEXAS COMMERCIAL FISHING REGULATIONS SUMMARY This publication is a summary of current regulations that govern commercial fishing, meaning any activity involving taking or handling fresh or saltwater aquatic products for pay or for barter, sale or exchange. Recreational fishing regulations can be found at OutdoorAnnual.com or on the mobile app (download available at OutdoorAnnual.com). LIMITED-ENTRY AND BUYBACK PROGRAMS .......................................................................... 3 COMMERCIAL FISHERMAN LICENSE TYPES ........................................................................... 3 COMMERCIAL FISHING BOAT LICENSE TYPES ........................................................................ 6 BAIT DEALER LICENSE TYPES LICENCIAS PARA VENDER CARNADA .................................................................................... 7 WHOLESALE, RETAIL AND OTHER BUSINESS LICENSES AND PERMITS LICENCIAS Y PERMISOS COMERCIALES PARA NEGOCIOS MAYORISTAS Y MINORISTAS .......... 8 NONGAME FRESHWATER FISH (PERMIT) PERMISO PARA PESCADOS NO DEPORTIVOS EN AGUA DULCE ................................................ 12 BUYING AND SELLING AQUATIC PRODUCTS TAKEN FROM PUBLIC WATERS ............................. 13 FRESHWATER FISH ................................................................................................... 13 SALTWATER FISH .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Upwelling As a Source of Nutrients for the Great Barrier Reef Ecosystems: a Solution to Darwin's Question?
    Vol. 8: 257-269, 1982 MARINE ECOLOGY - PROGRESS SERIES Published May 28 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. / I Upwelling as a Source of Nutrients for the Great Barrier Reef Ecosystems: A Solution to Darwin's Question? John C. Andrews and Patrick Gentien Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville 4810, Queensland, Australia ABSTRACT: The Great Barrier Reef shelf ecosystem is examined for nutrient enrichment from within the seasonal thermocline of the adjacent Coral Sea using moored current and temperature recorders and chemical data from a year of hydrology cruises at 3 to 5 wk intervals. The East Australian Current is found to pulsate in strength over the continental slope with a period near 90 d and to pump cold, saline, nutrient rich water up the slope to the shelf break. The nutrients are then pumped inshore in a bottom Ekman layer forced by periodic reversals in the longshore wind component. The period of this cycle is 12 to 25 d in summer (30 d year round average) and the bottom surges have an alternating onshore- offshore speed up to 10 cm S-'. Upwelling intrusions tend to be confined near the bottom and phytoplankton development quickly takes place inshore of the shelf break. There are return surface flows which preserve the mass budget and carry silicate rich Lagoon water offshore while nitrogen rich shelf break water is carried onshore. Upwelling intrusions penetrate across the entire zone of reefs, but rarely into the Lagoon. Nutrition is del~veredout of the shelf thermocline to the living coral of reefs by localised upwelling induced by the reefs.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 21, No. 10 October 2017 You Can’T Buy It
    ABSOLUTELY FREE Vol. 21, No. 10 October 2017 You Can’t Buy It Joseph Erb (Cherokee), Petition, acrylic on canvas, 24 x 36 inches Roy Bonney, Jr., Dogenvsv Degogigielv. Degogikahvsv. Noquu Otsilugi., acrylic on wood panel, 48 x 48 inches Images are from the exhibition Return from Exile: Contemporary Southeastern Indian Art, curated by Tony A. Tiger, Bobby C. Martin, and Jace Weaver, on view through December 8, 2017 at the Fine Art Museum, Fine & Performing Arts Center, Western Carolina University in Cullowhee, NC. The exhibition features more than thirty contemporary Southeastern Native American artists working in a variety of media including painting, drawing, printmaking, basketry, sculpture, and pottery. See the article on page 29. ARTICLE INDEX Advertising Directory This index has active links, just click on the Page number and it will take you to that page. Listed in order in which they appear in the paper. Page 1 - Cover - Western Carolina University in Cullowhee, NC Page 3 - Ella Walton Richardson Fine Art CRAIG NELSON Page 2 - Article Index, Advertising Directory, Contact Info, Links to blogs, and Carolina Arts site Page 4 - Nance Lee Sneddon Page 4 - Editorial Commentary, Corrigan Gallery, Ann Long Fine Art & Fabulon Page 5 - Fabulon Art Page 5 - City of North Charleston, College of Charleston & Charleston Artist Guild Page 6 - Karen Burnette Garner & Halsey-McCallum Studios Page 6 - Angline Smith Fine Art, Ella Walton Richardson Fine Art, Meyer Vogl Gallery & Page 7 - Call for Lowcountry Ceramic Artists, Rhett Thurman, Anglin Smith Fine Art, Life Celebrations October 6th - October 31st, 2017 Folly Beach Arts & Crafts Guild Helena Fox Fine Art, Spencer Art Galleries, The Wells Gallery at the Sanctuary, Page 8 - Meyer Vogl Gallery cont., Edward Dare Gallery , Fabulon cont.
    [Show full text]
  • Oyster Research and Restoration in U.S
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work is a result of research sponsored in part by NOAA Office of Sea Grant, U.S. Department of Commerce. The U.S. Government is authorized to produce and distribute reprints for governmental purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation that may appear hereon. VSG-03-03 http://www. virginia.edu/virginia-sea-grant MSG-UM-SG-TS-2003-01 http://www.mdsg.umd.edu OYSTER RESEARCH AND RESTORATION IN U.S. COASTAL WATERS WORKSHOP PURPOSE AND GOALS The NOAA National Sea Grant College program has made a substantial commitment to research on numerous aspects of the domestic oyster fishery. 1bis commitment represents a long-term, focused effort that has led to greater understanding of the biological, molecular genetic and ecological characteristics of these bivalves and the diseases that now impact them in U.S. coastal waters. The achievements of the Oyster Disease Research Program (ODRP) cover multiple areas, including the development of new tools for disease diagnosis, the successful breeding of disease resistant oyster strains, the development of new models of the interaction of disease and environmental factors and the development of a new understanding of the disease process at the cellular level. The Gulf Oyster Industry Program (GOIP) has extended this research to the Gulf of Mexico fishery and in addition has supported innovative research focused on numerous aspects of pathogens in oysters-including rapid detection and enumeration, new processing methods to ensure public health - while gaining an understanding of the impact ofharmful algal species. A strong, collaborative interaction with industry partners has been a hallmark of this program.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ward Family of Deltaville Combined 28,220 Hours of Service to the Museum Over the Course of the Last St
    Fall 2012 Mission Statement contents The mission of the Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum is to inspire an understanding of and appreciation for the rich maritime Volunteers recognized for service heritage of the Chesapeake Bay and its tidal reaches, together with the artifacts, cultures and connections between this place and its people. Vision Statement The vision of the Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum is to be the premier maritime museum for studying, exhibiting, preserving and celebrating the important history and culture of the largest estuary in the United States, the Chesapeake Bay. Sign up for our e-Newsletter and stay up-to-date on all of the news and events at the Museum. Email [email protected] to be added to our mailing list. Keep up-to-date on Facebook. facebook.com/mymaritimemuseum Follow the Museum’s progress on historic Chesapeake boat 15 9 PHOTO BY DICK COOPER 2023 2313 restoration projects and updates on the (Pictured front row, from left) George MacMillan, Don Goodliffe, Pam White, Connie Robinson, Apprentice For a Day Program. Mary Sue Traynelis, Carol Michelson, Audrey Brown, Molly Anderson, Pat Scott, Paul Ray, Paul Chesapeakeboats.blogspot.com Carroll, Mike Corliss, Ron Lesher, Cliff Stretmater, Jane Hopkinson, Sal Simoncini, Elizabeth A general education forum Simoncini, Annabel Lesher, Irene Cancio, Jim Blakely, Edna Blakely. and valuable resource of stories, links, and information for the curious of minds. FEATURES (Second row, from left) David Robinson, Ann Sweeney, Barbara Reisert, Roger Galvin, John Stumpf, 3 CHAIRMAN’S MESSAGE 12 LIFELINES 15 Bob Petizon, Angus MacInnes, Nick Green, Bill Price, Ed Thieler, Hugh Whitaker, Jerry Friedman.
    [Show full text]
  • Turbulent Convection and High-Frequency Internal Wave Details in 1-M Shallow Waters
    Reference: van Haren, H., 2019. Turbulent convection and high-frequency internal wave details in 1-m shallow waters. Limnol. Oceanogr., 64, 1323-1332. Turbulent convection and high-frequency internal wave details in 1-m shallow waters by Hans van Haren Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ) and Utrecht University, P.O. Box 59, 1790 AB Den Burg, the Netherlands. e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Vertically 0.042-m-spaced moored high-resolution temperature sensors are used for detailed internal wave-turbulence monitoring near Texel North Sea and Wadden Sea beaches on calm summer days. In the maximum 2 m deep waters irregular internal waves are observed supported by the density stratification during day-times’ warming in early summer, outside the breaking zone of <0.2 m surface wind waves. Internal-wave-induced convective overturning near the surface and shear-driven turbulence near the bottom are observed in addition to near-bottom convective overturning due to heating from below. Small turbulent overturns have durations of 5-20 s, close to the surface wave period and about one-third to one-tenth of the shortest internal wave period. The largest turbulence dissipation rates are estimated to be of the same order of magnitude as found above deep-ocean seamounts, while overturning scales are observed 100 times smaller. The turbulence inertial subrange is observed to link between the internal and surface wave spectral bands. Day-time solar heating from above stores large amounts of potential energy into the ocean providing a stable density stratification. In principle, stable stratification reduces mechanical vertical turbulent exchange, although seldom down to the level of molecular diffusion.
    [Show full text]