DOCSLIB.ORG

DEER CREEK WATERSHED TMDL Clarion County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DEER CREEK WATERSHED TMDL Clarion County FINAL DEER CREEK WATERSHED TMDL Clarion County For Acid Mine Drainage Affected Segments Prepared by: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection March 4, 2009 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction................................................................................................................................. 3 Directions to the Deer Creek Watershed .................................................................................... 7 Segments addressed in this TMDL............................................................................................. 8 Clean Water Act Requirements .................................................................................................. 9 Section 303(d) Listing Process ................................................................................................. 10 Basic Steps for Determining a TMDL...................................................................................... 10 Watershed Background............................................................................................................. 11 AMD Methodology................................................................................................................... 12 TMDL Endpoints...................................................................................................................... 14 TMDL Elements (WLA, LA, MOS) ........................................................................................ 15 Allocation Summary................................................................................................................. 15 Recommendations..................................................................................................................... 22 Public Participation................................................................................................................... 25 Future TMDL Modifications .................................................................................................... 26 TABLES Table 1. 303(d) Sub-List................................................................................................................. 3 Table 2. Applicable Water Quality Criteria.................................................................................. 15 Table 3. Deer Creek Watershed Summary Table ......................................................................... 16 Table 4. Waste Load Allocation for permitted Industrial discharge............................................. 22 ATTACHMENTS Attachment A ............................................................................................................................................27 Deer Creek Watershed Map ...................................................................................................................27 Attachment B.............................................................................................................................................29 Method for Addressing Section 303(d) Listings for pH.........................................................................29 Attachment C ............................................................................................................................................32 Method for Calculating Loads from Mine Drainage Treatment Facilities from Surface Mines ............32 Attachment D ............................................................................................................................................37 TMDLs By Segment...............................................................................................................................37 Attachment E.............................................................................................................................................94 Excerpts Justifying Changes Between the 1996, 1998, and 2002 Section 303(d) Lists and Integrated Report/List (2004, 2006) ........................................................................................................................94 Attachment F.............................................................................................................................................97 Water Quality Data Used In TMDL Calculations ..................................................................................97 Attachment G ..........................................................................................................................................109 TMDLs and NPDES Permitting Coordination.....................................................................................109 Attachment H ..........................................................................................................................................112 Comment and Response .......................................................................................................................112 2 TMDL1 Deer Creek Watershed Clarion County, Pennsylvania Introduction This report presents the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) developed for segments in the Deer Creek Watershed (Attachment A). These were done to address the impairments noted on the 1996 Pennsylvania Section 303(d) list of impaired waters, required under the Clean Water Act, and covers one segment on that list and additional segments on later lists/reports. Deer Creek is currently listed for impairments due to metals, pH and siltation. The TMDL addresses the three primary metals associated with acid mine drainage (iron, manganese, aluminum) and pH, the siltation impairments will be addressed in future TMDLs. Table 1. 303(d) Sub-List HUC 05010005; State Water Plan (SWP) Subbasin: 17-B Year Miles Segment ID DEP Stream Name Designated Data Source EPA 305(b) Stream Use Source Cause Code Code 1996 10.6 5375 49407 Deer Creek CWF 303 (d) Resource Metals List Extraction 1998 10.43 5375 49407 Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals Drainage 2000 10.46 5375 49407 Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals Drainage 2002 10.4 5375 49707 Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals Drainage 2004 10.4 5375 49707 Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals Drainage 2006 1.54 6304 Cooper Run CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals, pH 2008 (Old 20040427- Drainage & Siltation 1000-JCB) 2006 10.47 7722 Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals 2008 (Old 5375) Drainage 2006 3.59 4606 Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals, pH 2008 (Old 20030329- Drainage & Siltation 1400-JLG) 2008 0.5 13031 49408 UNT Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals Drainage 2008 1.44 13030 49415 UNT Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals Drainage 2008 0.71 13030 49417 UNT Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals Drainage 2006 1.31 6281 49422 UNT Deer Creek CWF SWMP Land Siltation 2008 (Old 20040420- Development 1100-JCB) 1 Pennsylvania’s 1996, 1998, and 2002 Section 303(d) lists and the 2004 and 2006 Integrated Water Quality Report were approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The 1996 Section 303(d) list provides the basis for measuring progress under the 1997 lawsuit settlement of American Littoral Society and Public Interest Group of Pennsylvania v. EPA. 3 2006 0.07 6286 63326 UNT Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals 2008 (Old 20040421- Drainage 0900-JCB) 2006 1.08 6286 63327 UNT Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals 2008 (Old 20040421- Drainage 0900-JCB) 2006 0.12 6286 63328 UNT Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals 2008 (Old 20040421- Drainage 0900-JCB) 2006 2.9 6820 63331 UNT Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals 2008 (Old 20040702- Drainage 1245-JCB) 2006 0.58 6820 63332 UNT Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals 2008 (Old 20040702- Drainage 1245-JCB) 2006 0.08 6820 63333 UNT Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals 2008 (Old 20040702- Drainage 1245-JCB) 2006 2.18 6820 63334 UNT Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals 2008 (Old 20040702- Drainage 1245-JCB) 2006 1.18 7133 63335 UNT Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine pH 2008 (Old 20040903- Drainage 1145-JCB) 2006 0.73 4606 63336 UNT Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine pH 2008 (Old 20040903- Drainage 1145-JCB) 2006 2.66 4606 63349 UNT Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals, pH 2008 (Old 20030326- Drainage & Siltation 1400-JLG) 2006 0.7 4606 63350 UNT Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals, pH 2008 (Old 20030329- Drainage & Siltation 1400-JLG) 2006 1.21 4606 63351 UNT Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals, pH 2008 (Old 20030329- Drainage & Siltation 1400-JLG) 2006 0.66 4606 63352 UNT Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals, pH 2008 (Old 20030329- Drainage & Siltation 1400-JLG) 2006 0.4 4606 63353 UNT Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals, pH 2008 (Old 20030329- Drainage & Siltation 1400-JLG) 2006 0.62 4606 63354 UNT Deer Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals, pH 2008 (Old 20030329- Drainage & Siltation 1400-JLG) 2006 1.92 6335 Frills Run CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals & 2008 (Old 20040429- Drainage pH 0900-JCB) 2006 3.75 6053 Judith Run CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals, pH 2008 (Old 20031023- Drainage & Siltation 1400-JLG) 2006 0.55 6053 63346 UNT Judith Run CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals, pH 2008 (Old 20031023- Drainage & Siltation 1400-JLG) 2006 1.69 6053 63347 UNT Judith Run CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals, pH 2008 (Old 20031023- Drainage & Siltation 1400-JLG) 2006 1.53 6053 63348 UNT Judith Run CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine Metals, pH 2008 (Old 20031023- Drainage & Siltation 1400-JLG) 2006 1.5 7127 Lauer Run CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine pH 2008 (Old 20040902- Drainage 1030-JCB) 4 2006 3.58 6321 Licking Creek CWF SWMP Abandoned Mine
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Maryland Darter Etheostoma Sellare
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Maryland darter Etheostoma Sellare Introduction The Maryland darter is a small freshwater fish only known from a limited area in Harford County, Maryland. These areas, Swan Creek, Gashey’s Run (a tributary of Swan Creek) and Deer Creek, are part of the larger Susquehanna River drainage basin. Originally discovered in Swan Creek nymphs. Spawning is assumed to species of darters. Electrotrawling is in 1912, the Maryland darter has not occur during late April, based on other the method of towing a net from a boat been seen here since and only small species, but no Maryland darters have with electrodes attached to the net that numbers of individuals have been been observed during reproduction. send small, harmless pulses through found in Gashey’s Run and Deer the water to stir up fish. Electrofishing Creek. A Rare Species efforts in the Susquehanna are Some biologists suspect that the continuing. Due to its scarcity, the Maryland Maryland darter could be hiding darter was federally listed as in the deep, murky waters of the A lack of adequate surveying of endangered in 1967, and critical Susquehanna River. Others worry large rivers in the past due to limited habitat was designated in 1984. The that the decreased darter population technology leaves hope for finding darter is also state listed. The last is evidence that the desirable habitat Maryland darters in this area. The new known sighting of the darter was in for these fish has diminished, possibly studies would likely provide definitive 1988. due to water quality degradation and information on the population status effects of residential development of the Maryland darter and a basis for Characteristics in the watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Subdivisions Colorado C L E a R C R E E K CO
    Fire & Ambulance Districts Park County Subdivisions Colorado C L E A R C R E E K CO. NAME TWP_RNG NAME TWP_RNG R76W R75W R74W R73W ADVENTURE PLACER T9S,R78W ELKHORN RANCHES T10S,R75 R72W ALMA T9S,R78W ELKHORN SUBDIVISION T9S,R76W ALMA BUCKSKIN CREEK AMENDED T9S,R78W ESTATES OF COLORADO T14S,R75W Duck Creek Truesdell Creek Indian Creek ALMA FOREST T9S,R78W ESTATES OF COLORADO 2 AMEND T14S,R75W Yankee Creek Cub Creek ALMA GROSE AND TREWEEK SOUTH T9S,R78W ESTATES OF COLORADO AMENDED T14S,R75W ALMA MERCURY HILL SUB T9S,R78W FAIRPLAY T9S,R77W North Elk Creek ALMA MISC TRACTS T9S,R78W FAIRPLAY BEAVER MEADOWS T9S,R77W ALMA MOYNAHAN ADD SOUTH T9S,R78W FAIRPLAY BRISTLECONE T9S,R77W North Fork Tanglewood Creek ALMA NORTH RHODESIA SOUTH T9S,R78W FAIRPLAY BURGIN ADDITION T9S,R77W ALMA PARK ESTATES T9S,R78W FAIRPLAY BUSINESS PARK T9S,R77W North Elk Creek ALMA PLACER SUBDIVISION T9S,R78W FAIRPLAY BUTTERMILK T9S,R77W 1038 T Francis Creek Church Fork ALMA RHODES 2ND ADDITION T9S,R78W FAIRPLAY CLARK AND BOGUES T9S,R77W Produced by Park County GIS PLATTEPLATTE CANYONCANYON FPDFPD FAIRPLAY COLUMBINE PARK T9S,R77W Scott Gomer Creek ALMA RHODES 3RD ADDITION T9S,R78W June, 2011 Threemile Creek FAIRPLAY GOLD PAN MH VILL T9S,R77W 65 T6S ALMA RHODES ADDITION T9S,R78W Geneva Creek T North Fork South Platte River Elk Creek FAIRPLAY HEIGHTS T9S,R77W Deer Creek ALMA RIVERSIDE T9S,R78W FAIRPLAY JANES ADDITION T9S,R77W Burning Bear Creek T66 ALMA VIDMAR T9S,R78W Camp Creek FAIRPLAY JOHNSON ADDITION T9S,R77W 63 Elk Creek ANGELFIRE T9S,R78W Lamping Creek T 1184 FAIRPLAY
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Wetland Condition on a Watershed Basis in the Mid-Atlantic Region Using Synoptic Land-Cover Maps
    ASSESSING WETLAND CONDITION ON A WATERSHED BASIS IN THE MID-ATLANTIC REGION USING SYNOPTIC LAND-COVER MAPS ROBERT P. BROOKS*, DENICE H. WARDROP, and JOSEPH A. BISHOP Penn State Cooperative Wetlands Center, 302 Walker Building, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 USA (*author for correspondence, phone: 814-863-1596, fax: 814-863-7943, e-mail:[email protected]) Abstract. We developed a series of tools to address three integrated tasks needed to effectively manage wetlands on a watershed basis: inventory, assessment, and restoration. Depending on the objectives of an assessment, availability of resources, and degree of confidence required in the results, there are three levels of effort available to address these three tasks. This paper describes the development and use of synoptic land-cover maps (Level 1) to assess wetland condition for a watershed. The other two levels are a rapid assessment using ground reconnaissance (Level 2) and intensive field assessment (Level 3). To illustrate the application of this method, seven watersheds in Pennsylvania were investigated representing a range of areas (89–777 km2), land uses, and ecoregions found in the Mid-Atlantic Region. Level 1 disturbance scores were based on land cover in 1-km radius circles centered on randomly-selected wetlands in each watershed. On a standardized, 100-point, human-disturbance scale, with 100 being severely degraded and 1 being the most ecologically intact, the range of scores for the seven watersheds was a relatively pristine score of 4 to a moderately degraded score of 66. This entire process can be conducted in a geographic information system (GIS)-capable office with readily available data and without engaging in extensive field investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Votes Loyalsock As PA River of the Year Perkiomen TU Leads
    Winter 2018 Publication of the Pa. Council of Trout Unlimited www.patrout.org Perkiomen TU Students to leads restoration research brookies project on on Route 6 trek By Charlie Charlesworth namesake creek PATU President By Thomas W. Smith Perkiomen Valley TU President In summer 2018, six college students from our PATU 5 Rivers clubs will spend a The Perkiomen Valley Chapter of month trekking across Pennsylvania’s U.S. Trout Unlimited partnered with Sundance Route 6. Their purpose will be to explore, Creek Consulting, the Montgomery do research, collect data and still have time County Conservation District, Penn State do a little bit of fishing in the northern tier’s Master Watershed Stewards and Upper famed brook trout breeding grounds. Perkiomen High School for a stream They will be supported by the PA Fish restoration project on Perkiomen Creek, and Boat Commission, three colleges in- Contributed Photo which was carried out over five days in Volunteers work on a stream restora- cluding Mansfield, Keystone and hopefully See CREEK, page 7 tion project along Perkiomen Creek. See TREK, page 2 Public votes Loyalsock as PA River of the Year By Pennsylvania DCNR Home to legions of paddlers, anglers, and other outdoors enthusiasts in north central Pennsylvania, Loyalsock Creek has been voted the 2018 Pennsylvania River of the Year. The public was invited to vote online, choosing from among five waterways nominated across the state. Results were pariveroftheyear.org Photo See RIVER, page 2 Loyalsock Creek was voted 2018 Pennsylvania River of the Year. IN THIS ISSUE Keystone Coldwater Conference ..........................3 How to become a stream advocate.......................6 Headwaters .............................................................4 Minutes ....................................................................8 Treasurer’s Notes ...................................................5 Chapter Reports ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended-Sediment Loads and Trends Measured at the Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Network Stations for Water Years 2009–2018
    Summary of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended-Sediment Loads and Trends Measured at the Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Network Stations for Water Years 2009–2018 Prepared by Douglas L. Moyer and Joel D. Blomquist, U.S. Geological Survey, March 2, 2020 The Chesapeake Bay nontidal network (NTN) currently consists of 123 stations throughout the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Stations are located near U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) stream-flow gages to permit estimates of nutrient and sediment loadings and trends in the amount of loadings delivered downstream. Routine samples are collected monthly, and 8 additional storm-event samples are also collected to obtain a total of 20 samples per year, representing a range of discharge and loading conditions (Chesapeake Bay Program, 2020). The Chesapeake Bay partnership uses results from this monitoring network to focus restoration strategies and track progress in restoring the Chesapeake Bay. Methods Changes in nitrogen, phosphorus, and suspended-sediment loads in rivers across the Chesapeake Bay watershed have been calculated using monitoring data from 123 NTN stations (Moyer and Langland, 2020). Constituent loads are calculated with at least 5 years of monitoring data, and trends are reported after at least 10 years of data collection. Additional information for each monitoring station is available through the USGS website “Water-Quality Loads and Trends at Nontidal Monitoring Stations in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed” (https://cbrim.er.usgs.gov/). This website provides State, Federal, and local partners as well as the general public ready access to a wide range of data for nutrient and sediment conditions across the Chesapeake Bay watershed. In this summary, results are reported for the 10-year period from 2009 through 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Catchable-Trout Stocking Program Changes by Tom Greene
    2002 Catchable-Trout Stocking Program Changes by Tom Greene photo-Art Michaels Beginning this season, the Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Com- As with past practice, changes for the 2002 season will mission will produce approximately 3.8 million adult trout include the addition of new water areas, some expansions to for distribution in the waters of the Commonwealth. In currently stocked waters, and the removal of several waters comparison with past practice, this figure represents a reduc- from the stocking program. tion of about 1.4 million trout from the 5.2 million or so stocked in 2001. New waters Pennsylvania’s state fish culture stations are currently For the 2002 season, new-water additions consist of three faced with challenges related to both water quantity and water previously stocked waters that return to the stocking program quality. To take prompt action to address these issues, it was as a result of completed dam maintenance repair and a necessary at least temporarily to reduce the number of adult landowner agreement to provide public angling. trout produced in our state hatcheries and stocked in state Cloe Lake, Jefferson County. Following a two-year waters open to free public fishing. period of drawdown for dam maintenance and repairs, this As part of this change, Commis- 25.5-acre lake is expected to be avail- sion fisheries managers have worked able for trout angling for the 2002 closely with law enforcement and season. If the water levels are re- other staff to develop a plan to real- stored according to schedule, the locate the stocking of hatchery trout lake will receive a preseason and an for the 2002 season and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Class a Wild Trout Waters Created: August 16, 2021 Definition of Class
    Class A Wild Trout Waters Created: August 16, 2021 Definition of Class A Waters: Streams that support a population of naturally produced trout of sufficient size and abundance to support a long-term and rewarding sport fishery. Management: Natural reproduction, wild populations with no stocking. Definition of Ownership: Percent Public Ownership: the percent of stream section that is within publicly owned land is listed in this column, publicly owned land consists of state game lands, state forest, state parks, etc. Important Note to Anglers: Many waters in Pennsylvania are on private property, the listing or mapping of waters by the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission DOES NOT guarantee public access. Always obtain permission to fish on private property. Percent Lower Limit Lower Limit Length Public County Water Section Fishery Section Limits Latitude Longitude (miles) Ownership Adams Carbaugh Run 1 Brook Headwaters to Carbaugh Reservoir pool 39.871810 -77.451700 1.50 100 Adams East Branch Antietam Creek 1 Brook Headwaters to Waynesboro Reservoir inlet 39.818420 -77.456300 2.40 100 Adams-Franklin Hayes Run 1 Brook Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 31 Bedford Bear Run 1 Brook Headwaters to Mouth 40.207730 -78.317500 0.77 100 Bedford Ott Town Run 1 Brown Headwaters to Mouth 39.978611 -78.440833 0.60 0 Bedford Potter Creek 2 Brown T 609 bridge to Mouth 40.189160 -78.375700 3.30 0 Bedford Three Springs Run 2 Brown Rt 869 bridge at New Enterprise to Mouth 40.171320 -78.377000 2.00 0 Bedford UNT To Shobers Run (RM 6.50) 2 Brown
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Summary Fishing Summary
    2019PENNSYLVANIA FISHING SUMMARY Summary of Fishing Regulations and Laws MENTORED YOUTH TROUT DAYS March 23 (regional) and April 6 (statewide) WHAT’S NEW FOR 2019 l Changes to Susquehanna and Juniata Bass Regulations–page 11 www.PaBestFishing.com l Addition and Removal to Panfish Enhancement Waters–page 15 PFBC social media and mobile app: l Addition to Catch and Release Lakes Waters–page 15 www.fishandboat.com/socialmedia l Addition to Misc. Special Regulations–page 16 Multi-Year Fishing Licenses–page 5 18 Southeastern Regular Opening Day 2 TROUT OPENERS Counties March 30 AND April 13 for Trout Statewide www.GoneFishingPa.com Go Fishin’ in Franklin County Chambersburg Trout Derby May 4-5, 2019 Area’s #1 Trout Derby ExploreFranklinCountyPA.com Facebook.com/FCVBen | Twitter.com/FCVB 866-646-8060 | 717-552-2977 2 www.fishandboat.com 2019 Pennsylvania Fishing Summary Use the following contacts for answers to your questions or better yet, go onlinePFBC to the PFBC LOCATIONS/TABLE OF CONTENTS website (www.fishandboat.com) for a wealth of information about fishing and boating. FOR MORE INFORMATION: THANK YOU STATE HEADQUARTERS CENTRE REGION OFFICE FISHING LICENSES: for the purchase 1601 Elmerton Avenue 595 East Rolling Ridge Drive Phone: (877) 707-4085 of your fishing P.O. Box 67000 Bellefonte, PA 16823 Harrisburg, PA 17106-7000 Phone: (814) 359-5110 BOAT REGISTRATION/TITLING: Phone: (866) 262-8734 license! Phone: (717) 705-7800 Hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. The mission of the Pennsylvania Hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday PUBLICATIONS: Fish & Boat Commission is to Monday through Friday BOATING SAFETY Phone: (717) 705-7835 protect, conserve, and enhance the PFBC WEBSITE: EDUCATION COURSES Commonwealth’s aquatic resources, www.fishandboat.com Phone: (888) 723-4741 and provide fishing and boating www.fishandboat.com/socialmedia opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Subbasin Survey Year-1
    Susquehanna River Basin Commission Lower Susquehanna River Subbasin Publication 282 Year-1 Survey September 2012 A Water Quality and Biological Assessment April - July 2011 Report by Ellyn Campbell Supervisor, Monitoring and Assessment SRBC • 1721 N. Front St. • Harrisburg, PA 17102-2391 • 717-238-0423 • 717-238-2436 Fax • www.srbc.net 1 Introduction The Susquehanna River Basin Commission (SRBC) conducted a survey of the Lower Susquehanna River Subbasin from April through July 2011. This survey was conducted through SRBC’s Subbasin Survey Program, which is funded in part through the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). This program consists of two-year assessments in each of the six major subbasins (Figure 1) on a rotating schedule. The goals of this Year-1 survey were to collect one-time samples of the macroinvertebrate community, habitat, and water quality at 104 sites in the major tributaries and areas of interest throughout the Lower Susquehanna River Subbasin. The Year-2 survey, which is a more focused, in-depth study of a select area, will follow in late 2013 and be focused on the three major reservoirs comprising the last 45 miles of the Susquehanna River—Lake Clarke, Lake Aldred, and Conowingo Pond. Previous surveys of the Lower Susquehanna River Subbasin were conducted in 1985 (McMorran, 1986), 1996 (Traver, 1997), and 2005 (Buda, 2006). A comparison of the 1996 and 2005 data along with the 2011 results is included in this report. Subbasin survey information is used by SRBC staff and others to: • evaluate the chemical, biological, and habitat conditions of streams in the basin; Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-02-02 010515__2021 Stocking Schedule All.Pdf
    Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission 2021 Trout Stocking Schedule (as of 2/1/2021, visit fishandboat.com/stocking for changes) County Water Sec Stocking Date BRK BRO RB GD Meeting Place Mtg Time Upper Limit Lower Limit Adams Bermudian Creek 2 4/6/2021 X X Fairfield PO - SR 116 10:00 CRANBERRY ROAD BRIDGE (SR1014) Wierman's Mill Road Bridge (SR 1009) Adams Bermudian Creek 2 3/15/2021 X X X York Springs Fire Company Community Center 10:00 CRANBERRY ROAD BRIDGE (SR1014) Wierman's Mill Road Bridge (SR 1009) Adams Bermudian Creek 4 3/15/2021 X X York Springs Fire Company Community Center 10:00 GREENBRIAR ROAD BRIDGE (T-619) SR 94 BRIDGE (SR0094) Adams Conewago Creek 3 4/22/2021 X X Adams Co. National Bank-Arendtsville 10:00 SR0234 BRDG AT ARENDTSVILLE 200 M DNS RUSSELL TAVERN RD BRDG (T-340) Adams Conewago Creek 3 2/27/2021 X X X Adams Co. National Bank-Arendtsville 10:00 SR0234 BRDG AT ARENDTSVILLE 200 M DNS RUSSELL TAVERN RD BRDG (T-340) Adams Conewago Creek 4 4/22/2021 X X X Adams Co. National Bank-Arendtsville 10:00 200 M DNS RUSSEL TAVERN RD BRDG (T-340) RT 34 BRDG (SR0034) Adams Conewago Creek 4 10/6/2021 X X Letterkenny Reservoir 10:00 200 M DNS RUSSEL TAVERN RD BRDG (T-340) RT 34 BRDG (SR0034) Adams Conewago Creek 4 2/27/2021 X X X Adams Co. National Bank-Arendtsville 10:00 200 M DNS RUSSEL TAVERN RD BRDG (T-340) RT 34 BRDG (SR0034) Adams Conewago Creek 5 4/22/2021 X X Adams Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumulative Water Use Availability Study
    ______________________________________________________________________________ Cumulative Water Use and Availability Study for the Susquehanna River Basin Publication No. 303 August 2016 ______________________________________________________________________________ John W. Balay, P.H. Manager, Planning & Operations Zhenxing Zhang, Ph.D., P.E., P.H. Contractor, Water Resources Engineer Jeffrey L. Zimmerman, Jr. GIS Analyst Pierre O. MaCoy, P.G. Hydrogeologist Charles G. Frank Web Application Developer Graham D. Markowitz Hydrologist Can Liu Hydrologist James M. Tierney, New York Commissioner Kenneth P. Lynch, New York Alternate Peter Freehafer, New York Alternate Patrick McDonnell, Pennsylvania Commissioner Kelly Jean Heffner, Pennsylvania Alternate Laura Mohr, Pennsylvania Alternate Ben Grumbles, Maryland Commissioner Saeid Kasraei, Maryland Alternate Virginia Kearney, Maryland Alternate Brig. General William H. Graham, U.S. Commissioner Colonel Edward P. Chamberlayne, U.S. Alternate David J. Leach, U.S. Alternate Amy M. Guise, U.S. Alternate Andrew D. Dehoff, P.E., Executive Director The Susquehanna River Basin Commission (Commission) was created as an independent agency by a federal-interstate compact* among the states of Maryland and New York, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the federal government. In creating the Commission, the Congress and state legislatures formally recognized the water resources of the Susquehanna River Basin as a regional asset vested with local, state, and national interests for which all the parties share responsibility. As the single federal-interstate water resources agency with basin-wide authority, the Commission's goal is to coordinate the planning, conservation, management, utilization, development, and control of basin water resources among the public and private sectors. *Statutory Citations: Federal - Pub. L. 91-575, 84 Stat. 1509 (1970); MD. CODE ANN., ENVIR.
    [Show full text]