A Brief History Concerning Prince George's County, Maryland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Brief History Concerning Prince George's County, Maryland A Brief History concerning Prince George’s County, Maryland by Tammy Loxton Thomas Paone Amanda Rowley December 4, 2008 2 In 1608, Captain John Smith described the landscape of what would become Maryland thus, “All the Country is overgrown with trees.” This land looked like England: “And so it must have seemed to men who carried with then the recollection of England’s green and pleasant land, dotted with fields and pastures, laced with roads and pathways. Only here and there had the native Indians cleared patches for corn and vegetables and built their huts, or wigwams. These Indians proved friendly; when they shortly agreed to quit the area peaceably, leaving their fields and dwellings to the adventurers, Father [Andrew] White exclaimed, ‘The finger of God is in this.’” 1 The Founding of Maryland and Prince George's County Maryland is one of the original thirteen states on the Eastern Seaboard. “Its small size belies the great diversity of its landscapes and of the ways of life that they foster, from the low- lying and water-oriented Eastern Shore and Chesapeake Bay area.” 2 Maryland’s current size is 10,454 square miles and has an estimated population of 5,618,344 people. Much has changed from 1634 when the first permanent settle was established, but diversity in landscape and inhabitants still exists. Prince George’s County, Maryland was founded in 1696. It is located in south-central Maryland on the Potomac River, close to the District of Columbia. It was named for Prince George of Demark, husband to Princess Anne, heir to the English throne. 3 The County’s current size is 486 square miles and has a population of about 774,000 people, being the second most populace county in Maryland.4 1 Aubrey C. Land, Colonial Maryland: A History (Millwood, N.Y: KTO Press, 1981), 10. 2 Encyclopædia Britannica online, s.v. " Maryland." http://search.eb.com/eb/article-9111236 (accessed November 28, 2008). 3 Katharine D. Bryant and Donna L. Schneider, Prince George’s County, Maryland. Images of America (Charleston: Arcadia Publishing, 2000), 7. 4 Encyclopædia Britannica online, s.v. “ Prince George's County.” http://search.eb.com/eb/article-9001160 (accessed November 28, 2008). 3 The story of the founding of Maryland is heavily dependent on the history of the Calvert family. George Calvert was born in 1580 in Yorkshire, England. He graduated from Oxford in 1597 and after a “grand tour” entered government service. He served as a Secretary of State from 1619 to 1625 where upon his conversion to Catholicism, resigned his position and was given the title “Baron of Baltimore” by King James. 5 Due to his new religious persuasion, he could no longer hold public office and thus turned his attention to his investments in the New World including the “Colony and Plantation of Newfoundland” and the Virginia Company. 6 In 1622 he “obtained a patent from the Crown to the whole southeast coast of the island" of Newfoundland, but his attempt to establish a colony there was hindered by the “cold climate and rocky soil.” 7 He asked for a new grant in the Chesapeake area and amid conflict with the Virginia settlers, King Charles I granted the charter in 1632 to establish a “new English colony in honor of Queen Henrietta Maria.” 8 George Calvert died two months before the charter was finalized, so it went to his son and heir, Cecil Calvert, Second Lord Baltimore. Cecil became the Lord Proprietor of Maryland, sole owner of the 6,769,290 acres by this royal patent. 9 Proprietary control stayed in the Calvert family until 1689 when a “rebellion by Protestants overthrew the proprietary officers, leading to an interval of crown rule in the royal colony of Maryland (1692–1715). During that period the Church of England was formally established. In 1715 Maryland once again became a proprietary colony of the Calverts, who had converted to Protestantism.” 10 5 Robert J. Brugger and Maryland Historical Society, Maryland: A Middle Temperament, 1634-1980, Robert G. Merrick ed. (Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press in association with the Maryland Historical Society, 1988), 4. 6 Land, Colonial Maryland , 4. 7 Brugger, Maryland, 4. 8 Brugger, Maryland, 5. 9 Land, Colonial Maryland , 6, 8. 10 Encyclopædia Britannica online, s.v. “Maryland.” http://search.eb.com/eb/article-9111236 (accessed November 28, 2008). 4 Maryland is also a story of religious refuge, tolerance and conflict. Upon George Calvert's conversion to Catholicism in 1625, he refused to take the Oath of Supremacy, the recognition of the “ultimate authority of the king in English ecclesiastical affairs.” 11 His son, Cecil, followed in his father’s footsteps in his religious preference and wanted the settlement of Maryland to be a “climate of religious and political orthodoxy.” England was in much turmoil with the reign of King Charles I and because of this “Puritans and Catholics suffered for failing to conform to the Church of England.” 12 Maryland would be different from Virginia in that it would provide religious asylum. 13 Jesuit missionaries were on the first ships for the Maryland settlement. These missionaries taught the Piscataway nation and baptized their chief, Kittamaquund in 1640. 14 Many religious differences and transitions have existed in Maryland’s history. Its religious culture is varied and strong and continues to be part of its history. Native American Presence in Prince George's County The first settlers to Maryland did not experience the hardships of Jamestown for many lessons had been learned, one being that the colonists and the Indians of the area needed to be on friendly terms. They found this accommodation in the Piscataway tribe: “For twenty years after the Maryland settlers landed they successfully befriended the closest Indian tribes by promising them protection from the Susquenhannocks, who for their part acted as a buffer against their aggressive Iroquois enemies farther north. Both whites and Indians had later examples of the other’s treachery. Even so, good fortune promised to fulfill [Lord] Baltimore’s hope for peace with the Maryland Indians.” 15 There were alliances between several of the native tribes in the area; the Piscataways were “in charge of a loosely knit smattering of tribes that included the 11 Brugger, Maryland, 4. 12 Brugger, Maryland, 5. 13 Brugger, Maryland, 7. 14 Brugger, Maryland, 18 and Land, Colonial Maryland, 41. 5 Anacostan, Mattawoman, Nanjemony, and Portobaco.” 16 The location of where the Piscataway tribe lived from the fourteenth to the seventeenth century is today’s Prince George’s County. 17 John Smith traveled in the region in 1608 and most likely would have come in contact with the Piscataway tribe. There was strife and small warfare between tribes in the area and trading and additional settlement went on between the Indians and the colonists. Historian James Merrell wrote of the integration of the Piscataways: “The history of the Piscataway Indians of Maryland, one tribe that accepted the authority of the English, demonstrates that it was possible for Indians to follow successfully a path that lay between total war and complete capitulation. Heirs to a cultural tradition characterized by stability and stubborn resistance to outside influences, and accustomed to dealing with incursions by other peoples, the Piscataways used their geographic distance from English settlements and the colonists' need for Indian allies and Indian corn to preserve their way of life after the English arrived.” 18 However, the alliance between the Piscataways and the colonists did not always prove beneficial to the Native Americans. Their tolerance of the white man was taken advantage of as the colonists would settle closer and closer to their land. Little was done to protect their land from the encroachment: “The Indian had no notion of private property in land, and, particularly when compensated by a little in the way of trade goods, offered no immediate opposition to white occupation.” 19 This issue was first addressed in 1662 with the creation of a reservation through a land grant to William Calvert and the establishment of Calvert Manor. Some additional measures, including preservation of the Accokeek Creek area, were taken to preserve the hunting 15 Brugger, Maryland, 10. 16 Bryant, 88. 17 Robert L. Stephenson, The Prehistoric People of Accokeek Creek (Accokeek, Md: Alice Ferguson Foundation, 1959), 2. Hereafter cited as Prehistoric People . 18 James H. Merrell, “Cultural Continuity among the Piscataway Indians of Colonial Maryland,” The William and Mary Quarterly 36, no. 4. Third Series (October, 1979): 549. 6 and fishing lands and waterways, but as time went on “the settlers had occupied all the fertile land along the river, forcing the Indians to leave their towns and plantations.” 20 Fighting between tribes and the colonists happened periodically from 1642 to 1685 leading to the destruction of the Susquenhannocks in 1676 and the removal of the Piscataways in 1699 to Virginia. By 1711, the Piscataways no longer existed as a separate tribal community. 21 As a result of this early Native American settlement, the Accokeek Creek site has proven to be a rich and valuable archeological site. Purchased in 1923 by Mrs. Alice L.L. Ferguson, the Accokeek Creek Site “is one of the most important sources of information on the prehistory of the Middle Atlantic Seaboard area.” 22 This site not only documents the presence of the Piscataway tribe, it also gives clues concerning prior occupants. The archeologists and volunteers thought to use stratigraphy to distinguish between the different eras and peoples, but this was not possible because the remains were not preserved in layers, being mixed due to the shallow ground and years of cultivation.
Recommended publications
  • The D.C. Freeway Revolt and the Coming of Metro Sidebar U.S. 50: the Roads Between Annapolis, MD, and Washington, DC
    The D.C. Freeway Revolt and the Coming of Metro Sidebar U.S. 50: The Roads Between Annapolis, MD, and Washington, DC Table of Contents From the Early Days ....................................................................................................................... 2 The Old Stage Road ........................................................................................................................ 2 Central Avenue ............................................................................................................................... 5 Maryland’s Good Roads Movement ............................................................................................... 6 Promoting the National Defense Highway ................................................................................... 11 Battle of the Letters ....................................................................................................................... 15 The Legislature Moves On ............................................................................................................ 19 Lost in the Lowlands ..................................................................................................................... 21 Getting to Construction ................................................................................................................. 24 Moving Forward ........................................................................................................................... 30 Completed ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016
    A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936
    [Show full text]
  • Field Trips Guide Book for Photographers Revised 2008 a Publication of the Northern Virginia Alliance of Camera Clubs
    Field Trips Guide Book for Photographers Revised 2008 A publication of the Northern Virginia Alliance of Camera Clubs Copyright 2008. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced or copied in any manner whatsoever. 1 Preface This field trips guide book has been written by Dave Carter and Ed Funk of the Northern Virginia Photographic Society, NVPS. Both are experienced and successful field trip organizers. Joseph Miller, NVPS, coordinated the printing and production of this guide book. In our view, field trips can provide an excellent opportunity for camera club members to find new subject matter to photograph, and perhaps even more important, to share with others the love of making pictures. Photography, after all, should be enjoyable. The pleasant experience of an outing together with other photographers in a picturesque setting can be stimulating as well as educational. It is difficullt to consistently arrange successful field trips, particularly if the club's membership is small. We hope this guide book will allow camera club members to become more active and involved in field trip activities. There are four camera clubs that make up the Northern Virginia Alliance of Camera Clubs McLean, Manassas-Warrenton, Northern Virginia and Vienna. All of these clubs are located within 45 minutes or less from each other. It is hoped that each club will be receptive to working together to plan and conduct field trip activities. There is an enormous amount of work to properly arrange and organize many field trips, and we encourage the field trips coordinator at each club to maintain close contact with the coordinators at the other clubs in the Alliance and to invite members of other clubs to join in the field trip.
    [Show full text]
  • Bikeway, Trails and Pedestrian Mobility
    THE ROLE OF TRAILS AND COMPLETE STREETS IN ACTIVE LIVING AND HEALTHY LIFE STYLES - A CASE STUDY FROM PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND Fred Shaffer Prince George’s County M-NCPPC Trails have traditionally been thought of as recreation facilities. However, there is growing recognition that trails can also serve as transportation connections and can facilitate healthier and more active lifestyles in both children and adults. Trail from student housing to the Trail from an apartment complex to the University of Maryland West Hyattsville Metro Recent plans and legislation have recognized the importance of promoting walking and biking and incorporating trails into communities and new developments. The Countywide Master Plan of Transportation recommends a countywide network of bicycle, pedestrian, and trail facilities. 2009 Approved Countywide Master Plan of Transportation (MPOT) – included extensive bicycle and pedestrian recommendations: Over 250 projects for trails, bikeways, and sidewalk construction Complete Streets Section and Policies Trail projects that improve access to parks, transit, and other destinations Sidewalk and trail construction through the development review process Identification of Priority Sidewalk Corridors (retrofit projects) The plan recommends a variety of facilities along roads and within open space that can connect to and complement park facilities and trails. These recommended facilities are within dedicated parkland, along utility and transit corridors, along road rights-of-way, and within future development. COMPLETE STREETS – IMPROVE ACCESS TO TRAILS AND ACCOMMODATE ALL MODES No matter how many trails you have, it is still crucial to have sidewalks and bikeways along roads to get people to all the destinations they need to go.
    [Show full text]
  • Mediamix a Quick Take on New Releases
    C M Y K M8 SOURCE 05-27-07 DC EE M8 CMYK M8 Sunday, May 27, 2007 x The Washington Post RoadTrip Go Tribal in Maryland WHERE: Waldorf. StartStartStart hereherehere Learn about Native American WHY: Hiking on tribal grounds, bows for beginners and powwowing with history, beliefs and tribal life PENN. H ST. with live performances outside the Piscataway. 15TH STREET AVE. PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE the National Museum of ST. the American Indian. The 17TH INDEPENDENCE AVE. 1 HOW FAR: About 70 miles from start to finish, or 2 ⁄2 hours by car from 9TH STREET Indian Summer Showcase, an Washington. evening concert series, is held 395 4TH ST. 295 twice a month from June he Piscataway Indian Festival and Pow-Wow is a true family affair. through September (the first Y one is Saturday). Next weekend, about 300 Native Americans from near (Maryland, 395 A W K R Virginia) and far (Central America, Hawaii) will gather at the Amer- A D.C. P 95 . 495 T M ican Indian Cultural Center in Waldorf to catch up as well as dance, sing, eat E 5 4 M and celebrate. In all, nearly 3,000 folks are expected to attend — extended . W . family, indeed. G Hosted by the Cedarville Band of the Piscataway tribe, the 25th annual 1 The Alexandria Archaeology 295 Museum displays stone tools event is a modern, more social take on the private gatherings the Piscata- CAMERON STREET and other artifacts from the way and other Native American tribes have been practicing for ages. “To- aits native peoples who lived in the George Catlin’s portr Alexandria day’s powwows are extensions of the tribal powwows that existed for hun- ve KING Alexandria area between 500 dreds of years,” says Natalie Proctor, tribal chairwoman of the Cedarville documented vanishing Nati ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Kendall W. Gambrill's History of Highland
    History of Highland Kendall W.Gambrill History of Maryland January 19, 1965 here is nothing altogether earth shattering about Highland. T Neither is there any momentous event in its history. The fate of no army was decided by where Josh Disney emptied his chamber pot. No government fell when Mrs. Dentz sang out her hymn on A windy March morning. Yet, the events alluded to and the many Others which, added to them, make the history of Highland are Worthy of being recorded. History is the story of man. The History of Highland is a tale taken from that story. There are two elements to this history. One is the physical Setting, and the other is the people associated with that setting. Highland is located North 39° 11’, West 76° 57’. To the south Lies the Patuxent river. Highland extends several miles north- East of the Patuxent for about three miles along its length. There being no official boundaries, one is left with determining For oneself just where Highland ends and some other community begins. The land is in the gently rolling lower Piedmont. As the most conspicuous topographical feature of the area, The Patuxent river attracted the attention of the first of our Species in the area - the Indians. The Indians gave it the name It now holds. In their tongue the name means “Small Descending Waters”.1 Although these Indians, the Piscataways, lived in Southern Maryland, it is evident that they were familiar with The length of the Patuxent valley by the name they gave to this river.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Access Points Within 50 Miles of Capitol Hill
    Public Access Points within 50 Miles of Capitol Hill Public Access Point Boat Ramp Fishing Swimming Restrooms Hiking/Trekking Location 2900 Virginia Ave NW, Thompson's Boat Center X X X X Washington, DC 20037 3244 K St NW, Washington, DC Georgetown Waterfront Park X X 20007 George Washington Memorial Theodore Roosevelt Island X X X Pkwy N, Arlington, VA 22209 West Basin Dr SW, Washington, West Potomac Park X X DC 20024 Capital Crescent Trail, Washington Canoe Club X Washington, DC 20007 600 Water St SW, Washington, DC Ganglplank Marina X X X X 20024 George Washington Memorial Columbia Island Marina X X X Parkway, Arlington, VA 22202 99 Potomac Ave. SE. Washington, Diamond Teague Park X X DC 20003 335 Water Street Washington, DC The Yards Park X 20003 Martin Luther King Jr Ave SE, Anacostia Boat House X Washington, DC 20003 700-1000 Water St SW, Washington Marina X X X X Washington, DC 20024 Anacostia Park, Section E Anacostia Marina X X X Washington, DC 20003 2001-2099 1st St SW, Washington, Buzzard's Point Marina X X X DC 20003 2038-2068 2nd St SW, James Creek Marina X X X Washington, DC 20593 Anacostia Dr, Washington, DC Anacostia Park X X X 20019 Heritage Island Trail, Washington, Heritage Island X DC 20002 Kingman Island Trail, Washington, Kingman Island X DC 20002 Mt Vernon Trail, Arlington, VA Gravelly Point X X 22202 George Washington Memorial Roaches Run X X X X Pkwy, Arlington, VA 22202 1550 Anacostia Ave NE, Kenilworth Aquatic Gardens/Park X X X Washington, DC 20019 Capital Crescent Trail, Jack's Boat House X X Washington, DC 20007 Daingerfield Island X X X X 1 Marina Dr, Alexandria, VA 22314 67-101 Dale St, Alexandria, VA Four Mile Run Park/Trail X X X 22305 4601 Annapolis Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Bond Funding
    2016 Bond Bill Funding During the 2016 legislative session, the Maryland General Assembly evaluated 155 bond bill requests that totaled nearly $32.5 million. The Senate and the House each funded $7.5 million in legislative projects; individual bond bills were not acted upon by the legislature. Instead, the General Assembly amended the State Capital Budget Bill (SB 191) to specifically list the projects selected for funding. The chart below indicates the status of those bond bills funded in 2016. The "Total" column on the right indicates the total amount of funding approved for each project. House Bill Senate Bill Amount House Senate Number House Sponsor Number Senate Sponsor Project Title County Requested Initiatives Initiatives Other Total Funding 432 Clippinger 790 Ferguson Baltimore Museum of Industry Statewide 500,000 200,000 200,000 1597 Oaks 1098 Klausmeier Girl Scouts of Central Maryland Urban Program Statewide 250,000 250,000 250,000 and STEM Center 1203 C. Wilson 972 Peters Patriot Point Statewide 500,000 250,000 250,000 500,000 1635 Clippinger 563 Ferguson Port Discovery Children's Museum Statewide 500,000 200,000 300,000 500,000 478 McCray 316 McFadden Ulman Cancer Fund Home for Young Adult Statewide 200,000 200,000 200,000 Cancer Patients and Caregivers 1539 Allegany County 1045 Edwards Friends Aware Facility Allegany 150,000 75,000 75,000 Delegation 1538 Allegany County 1044 Edwards Frostburg Museum Relocation Project Allegany 150,000 50,000 50,000 100,000 Delegation 987 Allegany County 900 Edwards Lefty Grove Statue Allegany
    [Show full text]
  • Gthe Emancipation of Slaves
    The Emancipation of Slaves in Civil-War Maryland: An American Epic Scott Harrison Ness Haverford College Senior History Thesis Spring 2008 Advisors: Emma Lapsansky-Werner and Sharon Ullman Acknowledgements My advisors, Emma Lapsansky-Werner and Sharon Ullman, played integral roles in both the shaping and execution of this thesis. Without their patience and enthusiasm, I would never have made it this far. My parents provided moral support during this yearlong ordeal, without which I would have likely driven myself insane. My father, a former history major himself and knowledgeable about the history of Maryland, provided the initial inspiration to examine this period in the state’s past, and introduced me to the Maryland Historical Society. My mother read every draft before submission and offered constructive feedback and criticism (often deservedly harsh). For this, words cannot express my sincere gratitude. This thesis is lovingly dedicated to my cat Annie. Neither blue nor grey, she is the quintessential lost Marylander who struggled to find a place in the divisive country. 1 Table of Contents Introduction ...………………………………………………...3 Chapter 1 Slavery and Civil War in Maryland: A State Torn …...............................................7 Chapter 2 The Invention of Language ………………...18 Chapter 3 1863: A Turning Point in Maryland Politics ……………………………………...32 Chapter 4 1864: Freedom and Reelection ……………..55 Conclusion …………………………………………………..68 Bibliography ………………………………………………...74 2 Introduction The coming [constitutional and] Presidential [elections are] not…mere [contests] between political parties to determine whose candidate and whose adherents shall exercise power during the next four years. [They are wars] of ideas, [contests] of principles. It is a question of National unity or of dissolution…If the people realize their danger, as we have reason to believe they do, victory will again perch upon the banners of the Union.1 The Baltimore American published this plea for voters to exercise their electoral responsibilities on October 6, 1864.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Regular Session
    HB 942 Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2016 Session FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE First Reader House Bill 942 (Delegate Rosenberg, et al.) Appropriations Creation of a State Debt - Baltimore City - Cylburn Arboretum Carriage House and Nature Museum This bill authorizes the issuance of general obligation (GO) bonds to provide a grant to a recipient for the acquisition, planning, design, construction, expansion, repair, restoration, renovation, reconstruction, or capital equipping of a specified facility. The bill takes effect June 1, 2016. Fiscal Summary State Effect: If adopted in whole or part, this grant will be part of the total GO debt authorization for FY 2017. The Spending Affordability Committee (SAC) recommended a GO debt authorization of $1.055 billion for FY 2017. The Maryland Consolidated Capital Bond Loan (MCCBL) of 2016, referred to as the FY 2017 capital budget, provides GO debt authorizations totaling $993.8 million, which is $56.2 million below the SAC recommendation. As introduced, an additional $8.6 million in prior year authorized GO bonds is to be deauthorized, thus increasing the amount of GO debt included in the MCCBL of 2016 to $1,002.4 million. Local Effect: None, unless the recipient is a local government. Small Business Effect: None. Analysis Current Law/Background: Bond Sales and Debt Service: The State last sold bonds on July 16, 2015, which included $500 million in new money bonds in support of the State’s capital program. Of the $500 million, $450 million was issued as new tax-exempt bonds and $50 million as new taxable bonds. The bonds were sold in separate series, with a combined true interest cost of 2.83%, with an average maturity of 10.3 years for the tax-exempt issuance and 1.35% over 4 years for the taxable issuance.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine Patricia Dockman Anderson, Editor Matthew Hetrick, Associate Editor Christopher T
    Friends of the Press of the Maryland Historical Society The Maryland Historical Society (MdHS) is committed to publishing the fnest new work on Maryland history. In late 2005, the Publications Committee, with the advice and support of the development staf, launched the Friends of the Press, an efort dedicated to raising money used solely for bringing new titles into print. Response has been enthusiastic and generous and we thank you. Our most recent Friends of the Press title, the much-anticipated Betsy Bonaparte has just been released. Your support also allowed us to publish Combat Correspondents: Baltimore Sun Correspondents in World War II and Chesapeake Ferries: A Waterborne Tradition, 1632–2000, welcome complements to the Mary- land Historical Society’s already fne list of publications. Additional stories await your support. We invite you to become a supporter, to follow the path frst laid out with the society’s founding in 1844. Help us fll in the unknown pages of Maryland’s past for future generations. Become, quite literally, an important part of Maryland history. If you would like to make a tax-deductible gif to the Friends of the Press, please direct your gif to Development, Maryland Historical Society, 201 W. Monument Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201. For additional information on MdHS publications, contact Patricia Dockman Anderson, Editor, 410-685-3750 x317, or [email protected]. Maryland Historical Society Founded 1844 Ofcers Robert R. Neall, Chairman Louise Lake Hayman, Vice President Alex. G. Fisher, Vice Chairman Frederick M. Hudson, Vice President Burton K. Kummerow, President Jayne H. Plank, Vice President James W.
    [Show full text]
  • Rustic Roads Functional Master Plan
    Approved and Adopted Rustic Roads Functional Master Plan December 1 996 The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission The Montgomery County Department of Park and Planning 8787 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910-3760 RUSTIC ROADS FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN Abstract Title Approved and Adopted Rustic Roads Functional Master Plan Author The Montgomery County Department of Park and Planning The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Subject Master Plan for the Rustic Roads of Montgomery County Date December 1996 Planning Agency The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 8787 Georgia Avenue Silver Spring, Maryland 20910-3760 Source of Copies The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 8787 Georgia Avenue Silver Spring, Maryland 20910-3760 Number of Pages 258 Abstract This document contains the text, with supporting maps and tables, for the Approved and Adopted Rustic Roads Functional Master Plan of Montgomery County. This document recommends identification and classi­ fication of 66 Rustic Roads, of which 12 are exceptional. In addition, the entire master-planned roadway network included in the Study Area is rec­ ommended for reclassification to a network appropriate for the rural area of Montgomery County. ii APPROVED & ADOPTED December 1996 RUSTIC ROADS FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN Certificate of Approval and Adoption This Amendment to the Master Plan of Highways within Montgomery County, as amended; the Master Plan of Bikeways, 1978, as amended; the Functional Master Plan for the Preservation of Agriculture and Rural Open Space, 1980, as amended; the Boyds Master Plan, 1985, as amended; the Damascus Master Plan, 1985, as amended; the Master Plan for the Potomac Subregion, 1980, as amended; and, the Olney Master Plan, 1980, as amended; has been approved by the Montgomery County Council, sitting as the District Council, by Resolution No.
    [Show full text]