DOCSLIB.ORG

Finding Sources of Fecal Coliform Bacteria in Stormwater Runoff

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Finding Sources of Fecal Coliform Bacteria in Stormwater Runoff Finding sources of fecal coliform bacteria in stormwater runoff David Tomasko, Ph.D. May 12, 2016 Why the concern over bacteria? • Cholera – Tens of millions killed over the centuries – > 100,000 Americans • 11th President, James Polk • Typhoid fever – Jamestown Colony – More deaths than from battle in Civil War Modes of transmission of typhoid (Anonymous 1939) John Snow and the founding of modern epidemiology Located ca. 10’ from abandoned cess pit Two main types of bacteria • Cocci (from Greek for seed) – Round • Single • Chains • More complex arrangements • Bacilli (from Latin for stick) – Rod-shaped • Single • Chains • More complex Total coliform bacteria • Subset of “rod or stick-shaped” bacteria – Pathogenic (disease-causing) – Non-pathogenic • Why such a broad category? – Inability of historical monitoring programs to detect specific pathogenic bacteria (National Research Council [NRC] 2004) • Vibrio cholerae – cholera • Salmonella typhii – typhoid fever • Problems? – Lack of specificity – Lots of false positives • Need for a more refined technique Fecal coliform bacteria • Testing using techniques hopefully more similar to human gastrointestinal tract – Higher incubation temperature • Replicating warm blooded organisms – Bile salts • Produced by liver • Original derivation of 200 colony forming units (cfu) / 100 ml – 18% of “total” coliform bacteria from Ohio River would test positive (NRC 2004) – Prior standard for total colform bacteria (U.S. Federal Water Pollution Control Administration) of 1,000 cfu / 100 ml – 0.18 x 1,000 = 180 – Rounded up to 200 cfu / 100 ml Fecal coliform standard (FAC 62-302) • Class III - monthly average less than of 200 cfu / 100 ml – Based on minimum of 10 samples over 30 days • Nor exceed 400 cfu / 100 ml in 10% of the samples • Nor exceed 800 cfu / 100 ml on any one day • Question – if monthly sampling, and value of 205? – Not in excess of 800 – 100 % of samples, but less than 400 – Not enough samples for 200 – not impaired • Question – if monthly sampling, and value of 405? – Not in excess of 800 – 100 % of samples, and higher than 400 - impaired 341 WBIDs impaired for fecal coliform bacteria 179 WBIDs with TMDLs for fecal coliform bacteria Important considerations • Fecal coliform bacteria are indicators of contamination by pathogenic organisms – Bacteria such as Salmonella sp. (typhoid), E. coli (gastroenteritis), Vibrio sp. (cholera) – Viruses such as enteroviruses, Hepatitis A – Parasites such as Giardia sp., Cryptosporidium sp. • Used for decades as more precise indicator of threat of contamination than total coliform bacteria However… • Fecal coliform bacteria can survive and multiply in sediments to numbers far higher than in original dosage from sewage • (LaLiberte and Grimes 1982, Ksoll et al. 2007) • Klebsiella pneumoniae – Normal constituent of human intestines – But also a natural constituent of soils • (Caplenas and Kanarek 1984) • Fecal coliform bacteria do not have to come from feces, whether human or animal – (Roll and Fujioka 1997) “Fecal” coliform bacteria in the Miami River watershed “Potential sources can include non-human fecal material, decay of vegetation (both native and non-native) and naturally occurring soil bacteria.” (Wagner Creek TMDL; FDEP 2006) Situation in Sunshine Lake • Hypereutrophic lake in Charlotte County • Massive algal bloom of benthic-associated cyanobacteria • Public demand to “do something” led to dredging of lake • Concurrent and ongoing work to determine the source(s) of nutrients that enabled the algal bloom to form – Ambient water – Groundwater sampling – Bottom seepage – Surface water runoff • Nutrient species (nitrogen and phosphorous) • Bacteria as potential indicator of sewage Hypothesis and Findings • If fertilizer a source – Elevated nitrogen and phosphorous, moderate bacteria • If sewage a source – Elevated nitrogen and phosphorous, high bacteria • If combination – both nutrients elevated, bacteria moderate to high • What was found - – Extremely high levels of phosphorous – Average to below average levels of nitrogen – Very high levels of fecal coliform bacteria • (> 1 million cfu / 100 ml) • How to explain findings? Interpretation of findings • Elevated phosphorous from influence of phosphorous-rich soils (adjacent to Bone Valley Formation) • Low nitrogen indicates lack of sewage and/or fertilizer influences • But what about elevated bacteria? – Source Molecular Laboratories (Miami) • Used in FC TMDL for Wagner Creek (FDEP 2006) • 3 locations sampled twice • ESP gene of Bacteroidetes bacteria for humans • Maximum frequencies for humans and dogs (combined) of less than 1% • So where did those bacteria come from, if not from humans or dogs?? Follow up steps • Consistent with guidance from FDEP (2011) – Work with Utilities to determine possibility of wastewater problems – Walk the WBID • Some evidence of dog feces • Locations with bare soils • LOTS of grass clippings Experimental design • Four treatments with three replicates each – 50 grams of dog feces – 50 grams of bare soil – 100 grams of grass clippings – Controls • 12 five-gallon buckets held in an abandoned trailer with no AC or fans • Ambient lake water with added materials • Project done from June to July 2015 • Fecal coliform bacteria sampled (APHA standard methods by NELAC-certified laboratory) on days 0, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 30 Overall set up Dog feces Soil Grass clippings Controls So, what did we find?? Interpretation • Elevated “fecal coliform” bacteria sources – Not from sewage – Not from soils – Less so from dogs • Microbial source testing and Walk the WBID • Although can be a source, obviously – Mostly from grass clippings • Not fecally-contaminated grass clippings Implications for Charlotte County • Sewage not the source of bacteria – No need to “fix” the sewage collection system • Dogs could be a source – Public education • Soils not likely a source • Grass clippings likely a source – Public education – Consistent with existing literature Broader Implications • > 150 TMDLs for fecal coliform bacteria in Florida • > 300 WBIDs “impaired” for fecal coliform bacteria • But… – Fecal coliform bacteria not specific to humans – Not specific to mammals – Not specific to animals, even How much of an issue is non-human sources? • 150,000 to 290,000 cfu / 100 ml in two “events” from White Ibis in Clam Bay, Collier County (Atkins 2012) • Based on average, one bird could cause 120,000 gallons of water to exceed shellfish harvesting limit of 43 cfu / 100 ml • 850 birds could produce enough fecal coliform bacteria (every day) to “impair” the 150 million gallons of Class II waters of Clam Bay • On a larger scale…. Bird-related fecal coliform bacteria loads to Malibu Lagoon, CA (Malibu Creek TMDL; US EPA) 2,000 400 350 1,600 300 1,200 day) / (billion 250 load load 200 800 150 Number of birds observed birdsof Number 100 400 Fecal coliform bacteria bacteria coliform Fecal 50 0 0 Draft revised criteria from FDEP (10/2013) • Class II – – Based on 5 samples per month – Geometric mean not to exceed 35 Enterococci cfu / 100 ml – No more than 10% to exceed 130 Enterococci cfu / 100 ml – Supplements Fecal Coliform Bacteria standard • Class III freshwater – – Based on 5 samples per month – Geometric mean not to exceed 126 E. coli cfu / 100 ml – No more than 10% to exceed 410 E. coli cfu / 100 ml – Replaces Fecal Coliform Bacteria standard • Class III marine – – Based on 5 samples per month – Geometric mean not to exceed 35 Enterococci cfu / 100 ml – No more than 10% to exceed 130 Enterococci cfu / 100 ml – Replaces Fecal Coliform Bacteria standard Have we solved the “false positive” problem? • More on this later… • But…these indicators can also survive and grow associated with decomposing vegetation (like “fecal” coliform bacteria) • (Byappanahalli et al. 2003, Whitman et al. 2003) • Has anyone already switched to these new standards? • What did they find?? Summary from Moore et al. (2007) • Epidemiology studies in 70’s and 80’s show good correlation between enterococcus concentration and bather illness in sewage-impacted water • Partly in response –EPA recommends (1986) enterococcus be used as salt water indicator • In 1999, California required testing recreational waters for Enterococcus (in addition to Fecal Coliform bacteria) • So, fewer false positives?? Moore et al. (2007) What?? While sewage is dominated by “fecal” Enteroccci Urban stormwater runoff is equally influenced from decomposing vegetation Even split in oceanic waters Experience in Southern California • Shift to use of Enterococci as primary indicator of bacterial impairment in 1990s • Resultant 5-fold increase in impairment determinations – 60% of which were exceedances of Enterococci, not Fecal Coliform bacteria • Sewage is itself associated with Enterococci species that are 90% associated with fecal input • Urban runoff can be equally dominated by Enterococci species that are associated with decomposing vegetation • Oceanic bathing waters were influenced equally by fecal material and decomposing vegetation • Even if fecal sources – not proof from humans Potential implications in Florida • Class II waters – potential increased frequency of impairment • Class III freshwater – likely a decreased frequency of impairment • Class III marine – potential increased frequency of impairment • How to respond to “impairment”? – Don’t MODEL it – not enough real data – Walk the WBID – look for potential sources – Where appropriate, source identification • Don’t just assume it’s from humans • Doesn’t have to be from humans to be a problem Questions? [email protected] .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Total and Fecal Coliform Bacteria
    TOTAL AND FECAL COLIFORM BACTERIA The coliform bacteria group consists of several types of bacteria belonging to the family enterobacteriaceae. These mostly harmless bacteria live in soil, water, and the digestive system of animals. Fecal coliform bacteria, which belong to this group, are present in large numbers in the feces and intestinal tracts of humans and other warm-blooded animals, and can enter water bodies from human and animal waste. If a large number of fecal coliform bacteria (over 200 colonies/100 milliliters or 200 cfu/100 ml) are found in water, it is possible that pathogenic (disease- or illness-causing) organisms are also present in the water. Fecal coliform by themselves are usually not pathogenic; they are indicator organisms, which means they may indicate the presence of other pathogenic bacteria. Pathogens are typically present in such small amounts it is impractical monitor them directly. For more information on E. coli and other pathogenic bacteria, see the U.S. FDA Center for Food Safety & Applied Nutrition's "Bad Bug Book" . Swimming in waters with high levels of fecal coliform bacteria increases the chance of developing illness (fever, nausea or stomach cramps) from pathogens entering the body through the mouth, nose, ears, or cuts in the skin. Diseases and illnesses that can be contracted in water with high fecal coliform counts include typhoid fever, hepatitis, gastroenteritis, dysentery and ear infections. Fecal coliform, like other bacteria, can usually be killed by boiling water or by treating it with chlorine. Washing thoroughly with soap after contact with contaminated water can also help prevent infections.
    [Show full text]
  • Fecal Coliform and E. Coli Concentrations in Effluent-Dominated Streams of the Upper Santa Cruz Watershed
    Water 2013, 5, 243-261; doi:10.3390/w5010243 OPEN ACCESS water ISSN 2073-4441 www.mdpi.com/journal/water Article Fecal Coliform and E. coli Concentrations in Effluent-Dominated Streams of the Upper Santa Cruz Watershed Emily C. Sanders, Yongping Yuan * and Ann Pitchford Landscape Ecology Branch, Environmental Sciences Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, 944 East Harmon Avenue, Las Vegas, NV 89119, USA; E-Mails: [email protected] (E.C.S.); [email protected] (A.P.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-702-798-2112; Fax: +1-702-798-2208. Received: 4 January 2013; in revised form: 26 February 2013 / Accepted: 26 February 2013 / Published: 11 March 2013 Abstract: This study assesses the water quality of the Upper Santa Cruz Watershed in southern Arizona in terms of fecal coliform and Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria concentrations discharged as treated effluent and from nonpoint sources into the Santa Cruz River and surrounding tributaries. The objectives were to (1) assess the water quality in the Upper Santa Cruz Watershed in terms of fecal coliform and E. coli by comparing the available data to the water quality criteria established by Arizona, (2) to provide insights into fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) response to the hydrology of the watershed and (3) to identify if point sources or nonpoint sources are the major contributors of FIB in the stream. Assessment of the available wastewater treatment plant treated effluent data and in-stream sampling data indicate that water quality criteria for E.
    [Show full text]
  • Fecal Coliform in Waco's Wetlands Cerin Daniel, Tiffany Du, Wakeelah Crutison Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798
    The Effect of Rainfall on Fecal Coliform in the Lake Waco Wetlands Cerin Daniel, Tiffany Du, Wakeelah Crutison Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798 Abstract: The primary objective of this project was to determine if Lake Waco Wetlands was reducing the amount of fecal coliform as water passed Materials and Methods: through the cells. The hypothesis stated that the amount of fecal Materials: coliform would decrease as the water flowed through the various cells EMB plate, incubator plate, test tubes and lactose broth, petri dish, filter paper, of the wetlands. Water samples were collected from four cells in the indole reagent, crystal violet, iodine, acetone alcohol, Safrinin, microscope wetlands. The Standard Qualitative Analysis of Water was utilized to detect fecal contamination. A series of tests which included the Method: presumptive test, the confirmed test, and the completed test were Collecting Data: Samples were collected with sterile cups. Cell one sample was utilized to determine whether fecal coliform was within the water collected near the water pipe which brings in water from the Bosque River. samples. If fecal coliform was present, a Gram stain identified if the Samples from cell two and cell three were collected near the beginning of the bacteria was E. coli. The results showed the MPN (most probable cell. Cell four sample was collected at the end of the cell. Each location was number of coliform)/ 100 mL declined as the amount of coliform flowed relatively close to the shore and was in a low-movement area. through the wetlands. It was concluded that the natural purification A.
    [Show full text]
  • Coliform Bacteria in Drinking Water Supplies
    WHAT ARE COLIFORMS? TOTAL COLIFORMS, FECAL ARE COLIFORM BACTERIA Coliforms are bacteria that are always COLIFORMS, AND E. COLI HARMFUL? present in the digestive tracts of animals, The most basic test for bacterial Most coliform bacteria do not cause including humans, and are found in their contamination of a water supply is the test disease. However, some rare strains of E. wastes. They are also found in plant and soil for total coliform bacteria. Total coliform coli, particularly the strain 0157:H7, can material. counts give a general indication of the cause serious illness. Recent outbreaks sanitary condition of a water supply. of disease caused by E. coli 0157:H7 have generated much public concern about this “Indicator” A. Total coliforms include bacteria that organism. E. coli 0157:H7 has been found organisms are found in the soil, in water that has been in cattle, chickens, pigs, and sheep. Most of Water pollution caused by fecal influenced by surface water, and in human the reported human cases have been due contamination is a serious problem or animal waste. to eating under cooked hamburger. Cases due to the potential for contracting of E. coli 0157:H7 caused by contaminated B. Fecal coliforms are the group of the diseases from pathogens (disease- drinking water supplies are rare. causing organisms). Frequently, total coliforms that are considered to be concentrations of pathogens from present specifically in the gut and feces fecal contamination are small, and of warm-blooded animals. Because the the number of different possible origins of fecal coliforms are more specific pathogens is large.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Operating Procedures for the Collection of Fecal Coliform Bacteria Samples in On-Site Sewage Systems
    Standard Operating Procedures for the Collection of Fecal Coliform Bacteria Samples in On-Site Sewage Systems Wastewater Management Program, [email protected], 360-236-3330 DOH 337-156 June 2018 For people with disabilities, this document is available on request in other formats. To submit a request, please call 1-800-525-0127 (TDD/TTY call 711) Page 1 1. Purpose and Scope 1.1. This document is the Washington State Department of Health (WSDOH) Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for collecting grab samples directly into sample bottles for the purpose of wastewater sampling and analysis of fecal coliform bacteria. The typical methods for fecal coliform analysis are: Standard Methods (SM) 9222D- a membrane filtration (MF) method and SM9221E the most-probable number (MPN) method. 1.2. This SOP includes the procedures for sample collection by hand with an extension sampler pole from a sampling location in an on-site sewage system. 2. Applicability These procedures are for the proper collection of grab samples for laboratory analysis of fecal coliform. We will collect samples from an on-site sewage system’s wastewater stream. This document is for post-UV disinfection unit effluent sampling locations where a free-falling sample can be easily collected by placing a sample bottle under the flow from the end of an open discharge pipe. With a well-mixed wastewater flow stream and with relatively uniform chemistry, these methods described in the SOP are sufficient to represent the effluent of the UV disinfection unit. 3. Definitions 3.1. Chain of Custody – An unbroken trail of accountability that assures the physical security of samples, data, and records.
    [Show full text]
  • Coliform Bacteria and Drinking Water
    Fact Sheet Coliform Bacteria Revised March 2004 and Drinking Water DOH PUB. #331 181 Public water systems are required to deliver safe and reliable drinking water to their customers 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. If the water supply becomes contaminated, consumers can become seriously ill. Fortunately, many steps are being taken to ensure that the public is provided with safe drinking water. One of the most important steps is to have the water tested for coliform bacteria. Public water systems must test for coliform bacteria regularly. What are coliform bacteria? Coliform bacteria are organisms that are present in the environment and in the feces of all warm-blooded animals and humans. Coliform bacteria will not likely cause illness. However, the presence of coliform bacteria in drinking water indicates that disease-causing organisms (pathogens) may be present in the water system. Most pathogens that can contaminate water supplies come from the feces of humans or animals. Testing drinking water for all possible pathogens is complex, time-consuming, and expensive. It is relatively easy and inexpensive to test for coliform bacteria. If coliform bacteria are found in a water sample, steps are taken to find the source of contamination and restore safe drinking water. There are three different groups of coliform bacteria; each has a different level of risk. Total coliform, fecal coliform, and E. coli Total coliform, fecal coliform, and E. coli are all indicators of drinking water quality. The total coliform group is a large collection of different kinds of bacteria. The fecal coliform group is a sub-group of total coliform and has fewer kinds of bacteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Reduction of Fecal Coliform Bacteria Through the Elimination of Sewage Discharges in West Virginia Streams Kady Rogers University of Kentucky
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Public Health (M.P.H. & College of Public Health Dr.P.H.) 2016 Reduction of Fecal Coliform Bacteria Through the Elimination of Sewage Discharges in West Virginia Streams Kady Rogers University of Kentucky Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits oy u. Recommended Citation Rogers, Kady, "Reduction of Fecal Coliform Bacteria Through the Elimination of Sewage Discharges in West Virginia Streams" (2016). Theses and Dissertations--Public Health (M.P.H. & Dr.P.H.). 79. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cph_etds/79 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Public Health at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Public Health (M.P.H. & Dr.P.H.) by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained and attached hereto needed written permission statements(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine). I hereby grant to The nivU ersity of Kentucky and its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Microbial Quality of Cantaloupe Fruit Produced On
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2017 Evaluation of the Microbial Quality of Cantaloupe Fruit Produced on Raised or Flat Beds Following a Flooding Event Isaack Kikway Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Plant Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Kikway, Isaack, "Evaluation of the Microbial Quality of Cantaloupe Fruit Produced on Raised or Flat Beds Following a Flooding Event" (2017). LSU Master's Theses. 4508. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/4508 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EVALUATION OF THE MICROBIAL QUALITY OF CANTALOUPE FRUIT PRODUCED ON RAISED OR FLAT BEDS FOLLOWING A FLOODING EVENT A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology by Isaack Kikway B.S., University of Eldoret-Kenya, 2013 May 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There were a great number of people who helped make this thesis possible. I would first like to thank my advisor, Dr. Melanie Lewis Ivey for giving me the opportunity to call this project my own. I am forever grateful for her support and patience with me as I tested every possible limit.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacteria in Surface Waters.Pdf
    WD-BB-14 2019 Bacteria in Surface Waters What are Coliform Bacteria? Coliform bacteria are a large assemblage of various species of bacteria that are linked together because of the ease of culturing as a single group. They include both fecal and non-fecal coliform bacterial sources. Fecal coliforms are bacteria that are found naturally in the intestines of warm-blooded animals. Fecal coliforms are sometimes pathogenic, as many are disease-causing species, though non-pathogenic species may be present too. The presence of fecal coliform bacteria may indicate contamination of the waterbody by human and/or animal fecal material. What is Escherichia coli? Escherichia coli, commonly called E. coli, is one of the most common species of fecal coliform bacteria. It is a normal component of the large intestines in humans and other warm-blooded animals, and it’s found in human sewage in high numbers. E. coli is used as an indicator organism for fecal contamination because it is easily cultured. If sewage is present in water, pathogenic or disease-causing organisms may also be present. What are Enterococci? Enterococci are another type of fecal bacteria which are a subgroup of the fecal streptococcus group. Enterococci have the ability to survive in saltwater and therefore are the chosen indicator organism for coastal beaches and shellfish harvesting areas. Why do we measure bacteria? Typhoid and cholera epidemics in the mid-19th century led to the discovery that certain gastro-intestinal diseases of humans are transmitted via water. The disease-causing organisms leave the infected individual via the feces, which can become discharged into surface waters.
    [Show full text]
  • What to Do If Coliform Bacteria Is Present in a Well Water Sample • Don’T Panic
    What to do if Coliform Bacteria is Present In a Well Water Sample • Don’t panic. • Don’t rush into expensive repairs or water treatment. • Don’t drink the water without treating it until you find and fix the problem. Coliform is a large group with many different kinds of 4. The sample was contaminated in the bacteria. Most Coliform bacteria are harmless. collection process. Common problems include: Various types of Coliform live in the soil and even on (a) A hose, aerator screen, filter or other attachment on surfaces in your home, but they do not occur naturally the faucet. (b) Accidentally touching the inside of the in groundwater. If Coliform bacteria (sometimes lid or the top of the bottle. (c) Not running the water 3- reported as Total Coliform) are found in your well 5 minutes before collecting it. Carefully collect another water, it is an indication that disease-causing bacteria sample and retest. Use rubbing alcohol on a clean could get in the same way. paper towel to wipe the faucet before letting the water If any Coliform bacteria are found, the lab does a run for 3-5 minutes. second test to look for the special sub-group of 5. A movable faucet. Sometimes bacteria grow Coliform that live in the guts of mammals and birds. at the swivel point. This is not harmful, but still shows This test is for E. coli or Fecal Coliform. These up in the test. If the sample was from a movable faucet, bacteria indicate that your well water has come into do the test again using another faucet.
    [Show full text]
  • Drinking Water Is One of the Oldest and Most Critical Public Health Efforts
    WATER QUALITY PUBLIC HEALTH ISSUE: Ensuring the quality and availability of drinking water is one of the oldest and most critical public health efforts. The bacterial quality of drinking water is the single most important water quality test as disease-causing organisms are a major health concern. One glass containing just a few microorganisms can cause illness in anyone ingesting the water. In contrast, contamination by chemicals such as petroleum by-products, or a naturally occurring element such as arsenic or radon, usually requires a long period of exposure to cause measurable health risks. The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) Amendments of 1986 and 1996 were designed to ensure safe drinking water for all Americans. States implement the program with technical and financial support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In New Hampshire, the Department of Environmental Services (DES) is the primary agent and lead agency for the SDWA. Populations at higher risk for adverse health effects from contaminated water include children, the elderly, pregnant women, and persons who are immunocompromised from infection with HIV, are undergoing chemotherapy, or have auto-immune illnesses. ROLE OF THE LOCAL HEALTH OFFICER: 1. Testing of water supplies (RSA 485:33): If a health officer suspects, or is made aware of, a public or private water supply that may be contaminated, they may be able to offer suggestions on having the water supply tested. 2. Public notice: When a public water system fails to submit required bacterial samples to DES, the owners are guilty of a violation of the program and must formally notify all consumers (“give public notice”).
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis of Fecal Coliform of Canadarago Lake Tributaries and Outlet
    Water quality monitoring and analysis of fecal coliform of Canadarago Lake tributaries and outlet Tara Perry1 and Marina Brown2 INTRODUCTION Canadarago Lake, in Richfield Springs, NY, has four main tributaries and empties into Oaks Creek. Physical and chemical water sampling on these waterways has historically been conducted to evaluate the state of Canadarago Lake, its tributaries and outlet (Hart et al. 1980; Albright and Waterfield 2012). The purpose of this current effort of tributary monitoring is to recognize any changes that may reflect changes in land use throughout the watershed. One aspect of lake monitoring is fecal coliform analysis in its tributaries and outlet. Fecal coliform are gram negative, non-sporulating, facultative anaerobic, rod-shaped bacteria that are good indicator organisms used to evaluate water quality (APHA 2012). These bacteria are naturally found in the intestines of mammals and birds. Most fecal coliform bacteria are not harmful to humans, though their presence indicates fecal contamination, which may contain disease-causing pathogens. Federal guidelines recommend no fecal coliform be present in drinking water (AWWA 1990), and no more than 200 colony producing units per 100ml of water (CPU/100ml) should be present in recreational waters (APHA 2012). High fecal coliform levels can also be associated with elevated levels of phosphorous and nitrogen due to a common source, such as agricultural manure runoff or poorly maintained wastewater treatment systems. This study is intended to serve as an extension of work conducted by Albright and Waterfield (2012) as part of The State of Canadarago Lake report. Concurrent with this work, other surveys were conducted on these same tributaries to better characterize the quality and communities of each.
    [Show full text]