DOCSLIB.ORG

The Volcanic Geology of Morella Crater, Ganges Cavus and Elaver Vallis, Mars

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Volcanic Geology of Morella Crater, Ganges Cavus and Elaver Vallis, Mars The volcanic geology of Morella Crater, Ganges Cavus and Elaver Vallis, Mars Joseph R. Michalski ( [email protected] ) University of Hong Kong Research Article Keywords: pressurized groundwater, volcanic geology, Morella Crater, Ganges Cavus, Elaver Vallis, Mars Posted Date: February 20th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-198982/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/24 Abstract Mars contains a large number of yet unexplained collapse features, sometimes spatially linked to large outow channels. These pits and cavi are often taken as evidence for collapse due to the release of large volumes of pressurized groundwater. One such feature, Ganges Cavus, is an extremely deep (~ 6 km) collapse structure nested on the southern rim of Morella Crater, a 78-km-diameter impact structure breached on its east side by the Elaver Vallis outow channel. Previous workers have concluded that Ganges Cavus, and other similar collapse features in the Valles Mariners area formed due to catastrophic release of pressurized groundwater that ponded and ultimately owed over the surface. However, in the case of Ganges Cavus and Morella Crater, I show that the groundwater hypothesis cannot adequately explain the geology. The geology of Morella Crater, Ganges Cavus and the surrounding plains including Elaver Vallis is dominantly volcanic. Morella Crater contained a large picritic to komatiitic lava lake (> 3400 km3), which may have spilled through the eastern wall of the basin. Ganges Cavus is a voluminous (> 2100 km3) collapsed caldera. Morella Crater, Ganges Cavus and Elaver Vallis illustrate a volcanic link between structural collapse, formation and potential spillover of a large lake, and erosion and transport, but in this case, the geology is volcanic from source to sink. The geologic puzzle of Morella Crater and Ganges Cavus has important implications for the origins of other collapse structures on Mars and challenges the idea of pressurized groundwater release on Mars. 1. Introduction The surface of Mars exhibits many large, complex collapse features. Since they were rst discovered nearly 50 years ago, multiple hypotheses have been put forward to explain their formation. Many or most of these ideas have a common thread, which is that collapse of the Martian surface occurred due to removal of ground ice or groundwater (Carr, 1987). A connection between surface collapse and ground ice or groundwater is reasonable. Mars is a cold planet with a porous crust where ground ice is predicted to be stable at various depths 2, and in some cases, is directly observed even today 3. Jumbled blocks of disrupted terrain termed “chaos” are spatially linked with outow channels. These channels are seen by some as analogous to glacial outburst oods on Earth that form due to rapid and catastrophic melting of glacial ice, sometimes associated with warming climate and other times associated with subglacial volcanism 4–8. On Mars, potentially contentious elements of the aqueous hypotheses include the existence, rapid release and recharge of vast quantities of groundwater and ground ice 2. The link between ground ice, groundwater and surface collapse on Mars remains enigmatic. On Earth, catastrophic oods are never associated with signicant surface collapse, but are sometimes associated with volcanism 9,10. On Earth, many steep-sided collapse features result from removal of subsurface material physically (e.g mining) or more often chemically (e.g. dissolution, cave formation, karsting, etc.) 11. Though lava tubes exist on Mars 12, they are characterized by pit chains and are much smaller volume Page 2/24 than the collapse features associated with chaos terrain. The formation of caves by dissolution has been previously proposed 6,13, but a more recent picture of the subsurface geology and mineralogy shows rocks susceptible to large-scale dissolution (e.g. carbonates and salts) are not present in large enough thickness or volume to facilitate surface collapse by subsurface dissolution 14. On Mars, many examples of major surface collapse have no association with channels or other evidence for aqueous processes, and likely have volcanic/magmatic origins 15. Yet in some areas of Mars, a temporal and spatial link between jumbled, chaotic terrains and extremely large channel forms is undeniable 16. There may be a causal link between collapse and formation of outow channels, be it volcanism 17 or groundwater release 18. The idea of catastrophic collapse by groundwater release remains widely cited and accepted for Mars, but there are no known examples of an analogous type of large-scale surface collapse caused by groundwater on Earth or other planets. Caldera formation can however form a wide range of complex collapse features of comparable structure, size, depth and surface expression 19. Channels of the scale of Martian outow channels attributable to formation by owing water have not been observed on Earth or other planets. However, some large channels of similar dimensions are observed on the Moon and Venus, where erosion by water is impossible 17. This paper investigates the geology of the Xanthe Terra region, and focuses primarily on the geology of Morella Crater, Ganges Cavus, and the Elaver Vallis outow channel (Fig. 1). Morella Crater is a 70 km- diameter structure that occurs at 308.6E, 9.5S, directly south of Ganges Chasma (Fig. 1). The crater is breached on its east side by Elaver Vallis, a ~ 180 km long suite of outow channels. Previous authors have concluded that Elaver Vallis formed during a megaood sourced from release of pressurized groundwater in Morella Crater 20. This work challenges the idea that Ganges Cavus and other collapse features in the Xanthe Terra region formed by catastrophic release of groundwater and further explores the hypothesis that surface collapse was instead driven by magmatism. 2. Results 2.1. Geomorphology Ganges Cavus is a deep, asymmetric, steep walled pit located on the southern edge of Morella crater (Fig. 1). The southern rim of the cavus has an elevation of 2000 m, which is 1000 m higher than the northern rim of the cavus. The hummocky, irregular oor of the cavus is tilted toward the north where it reaches its greatest depth at -4000 m elevation. A conservative estimate of the current volume of the depression is > 2100 km3. The oor units are composed largely of light-toned, smooth, hummocky deposits, but other parts of the oor contain irregular boulders that span an array of colours in HiRISE false colour data. Thermal inertia values of materials in the lower slopes of the cavus are ~ 500 and values for the hummocky oor deposits are ~ 800, suggesting the presence of rocky material (Fergason et al., 2006). The elevation of the oor of the Ganges Cavus (-4000 m) is approximately the same as the Page 3/24 elevation of the oor of Ganges Chasma, the southern margin of which is located < 10 km from the northern rim of Morella Crater (Fig. 1). The ~ 180 km-long Elaver Vallis outow channel seemingly originates at a breach in the eastern wall of Morella Crater (Figs. 1 and 2a). It consists of two compound channels, a main northern channel and shorter southern channel. In longitudinal cross section, note that the maximum depth of the northern channel is ~ 400 m and the maximum depth of the southern channel is ~ 250 m. However, one critical point that has never been addressed is the fact that a cross section along the channel centre, in both cases, shows that the topographic high point of the channel occurs near the midpoint of the channel along its length. In other words, the elevation of the channel oor of the midpoint of Elaver Vallis is > 250 meters higher than both the origin and terminus of the channel. Elaver Vallis is disrupted by chaos terrain, which composes the topographically higher ground near the midpoint of the channel (Fig. 2). The chaos occurs in multiple distinct patches (Fig. 2), with a total area of approximately 2000 km2 and depths below the surrounding plains of ~ 500 m. The chaos blocks rise to ~ 100–500 m above the oor of the chaos unit. The plains surrounding Elaver Vallis are mapped as Middle to Late Noachian undifferentiated units by Tanaka et al. (2014). Higher resolution views show that they are volcanic plains containing NE-SW trending fractures (Fig. 2). A ~ 11 km-diameter, 700 m-deep irregularly shaped, at-oored depression might be a volcanic vent (See Supplementary Materials). The depth/diameter ratio for this feature is high for any crater, and extremely high for anything but a youthful crater unmodied by erosion (Michalski and Bleacher, 2013). But the depression is likely Hesperian, and therefore it is unlikely to be an impact crater based on morphometrics. Smaller channels are also observed within Morella crater (Fig. 3a). These consist of a few nearly straight (low sinuosity) channels up to ~ 35 m length that ow into Ganges Cavus. The channels occur within gently sloping valleys, but the channels themselves occur in positive relief approximately 5–15 m above the adjacent terrain. 2.2. Surface mineralogy Both thermal infrared emission (THEMIS and TES) and near infrared/short-wave infrared reectance (CRISM and OMEGA) data detect olivine within crater oor deposits (Fig. 3b-c). THEMIS daytime DCS images colour stretched with bands 8, 7, and 5 as R, G, and B, respectively show olivine occurrences as purple 28, and provide a reliable way to map olivine occurrence on Mars in the thermal infrared (Fig. 3b). OMEGA global olivine index maps 29 and CRISM multispectral index maps 26 indicate the presence of olivine in the same locations (Fig. 3c). The OMEGA spectral indices suggest that the olivine is Mg-rich or ne-grained, based on comparison to laboratory spectra.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cross-References ASTEROID IMPACT Definition and Introduction History of Impact Cratering Studies
    18 ASTEROID IMPACT Tedesco, E. F., Noah, P. V., Noah, M., and Price, S. D., 2002. The identification and confirmation of impact structures on supplemental IRAS minor planet survey. The Astronomical Earth were developed: (a) crater morphology, (b) geo- 123 – Journal, , 1056 1085. physical anomalies, (c) evidence for shock metamor- Tholen, D. J., and Barucci, M. A., 1989. Asteroid taxonomy. In Binzel, R. P., Gehrels, T., and Matthews, M. S. (eds.), phism, and (d) the presence of meteorites or geochemical Asteroids II. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, pp. 298–315. evidence for traces of the meteoritic projectile – of which Yeomans, D., and Baalke, R., 2009. Near Earth Object Program. only (c) and (d) can provide confirming evidence. Remote Available from World Wide Web: http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/ sensing, including morphological observations, as well programs. as geophysical studies, cannot provide confirming evi- dence – which requires the study of actual rock samples. Cross-references Impacts influenced the geological and biological evolu- tion of our own planet; the best known example is the link Albedo between the 200-km-diameter Chicxulub impact structure Asteroid Impact Asteroid Impact Mitigation in Mexico and the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. Under- Asteroid Impact Prediction standing impact structures, their formation processes, Torino Scale and their consequences should be of interest not only to Earth and planetary scientists, but also to society in general. ASTEROID IMPACT History of impact cratering studies In the geological sciences, it has only recently been recog- Christian Koeberl nized how important the process of impact cratering is on Natural History Museum, Vienna, Austria a planetary scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Extraordinary Rocks from the Peak Ring of the Chicxulub Impact Crater: P-Wave Velocity, Density, and Porosity Measurements from IODP/ICDP Expedition 364 ∗ G.L
    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 495 (2018) 1–11 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth and Planetary Science Letters www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl Extraordinary rocks from the peak ring of the Chicxulub impact crater: P-wave velocity, density, and porosity measurements from IODP/ICDP Expedition 364 ∗ G.L. Christeson a, , S.P.S. Gulick a,b, J.V. Morgan c, C. Gebhardt d, D.A. Kring e, E. Le Ber f, J. Lofi g, C. Nixon h, M. Poelchau i, A.S.P. Rae c, M. Rebolledo-Vieyra j, U. Riller k, D.R. Schmitt h,1, A. Wittmann l, T.J. Bralower m, E. Chenot n, P. Claeys o, C.S. Cockell p, M.J.L. Coolen q, L. Ferrière r, S. Green s, K. Goto t, H. Jones m, C.M. Lowery a, C. Mellett u, R. Ocampo-Torres v, L. Perez-Cruz w, A.E. Pickersgill x,y, C. Rasmussen z,2, H. Sato aa,3, J. Smit ab, S.M. Tikoo ac, N. Tomioka ad, J. Urrutia-Fucugauchi w, M.T. Whalen ae, L. Xiao af, K.E. Yamaguchi ag,ah a University of Texas Institute for Geophysics, Jackson School of Geosciences, Austin, USA b Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, Austin, USA c Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College, London, UK d Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre of Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany e Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, USA f Department of Geology, University of Leicester, UK g Géosciences Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, France h Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Canada i Department of Geology, University of Freiburg, Germany j SM 312, Mza 7, Chipre 5, Resid.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Mysteries: Landform Pictograms
    Landform Pictograms on Mars Zabel, Castello, & Makaula Page 28 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Journal of STEM Arts, Crafts, and Constructions Mars Mysteries: Volume 3, Number 1, Pages 28-45. Landform Pictograms James Zabel Mathieu Castello and Fiddelis Blessings Makaula University of Northern Iowa Abstract The Journal’s Website: Graphic organizers are a way for teachers to accommodate http://scholarworks.uni.edu/journal-stem-arts/ students with disabilities such as poor memory or emotional disorders. This technique allows organization of thoughts and visual representation of relationships between ideas and Introduction facts. Indeed, poor memory affects students’ reflection and retention of information while emotional disorders can cause Helping students adjust emotions to maintain self- a lack of focus in the classroom. Accommodations for regulated learning and motivation is a key to successful students with these disabilities is important because students with emotional disorders may experience social teaching and academic achievement (Mega, Ronconi, & De isolation, which in turn may negatively affect their levels of Beni, 2014). Pointing to the need for a solution to the problem academic achievement. Twenty high-achieving doctoral of students’ dwindling interest in science as they mature, U.S. students participated in a teaching experience designed to students lose enthusiasm for science in elementary school or introduce gifted students with learning disabilities to using middle school (Greenfield, 1996), while the number of de Bono thinking skills to mediate the possible negative students who continue to pursue science in high school and effects of the disabilities through an arts-integrated project college continues to drop dramatically (Simpson & Oliver, focused on some of the mysteries of the planet Mars.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Mars As a Planet, Possible Life on Mars
    EVOLUTION OF MARS LECTURE 18 NEEP 533 HARRISON H. SCHMITT NASA HST IMAGE N THARSIS HELLAS S ANDESITE OR WEATHERED SOIL DUST DUST DUST BASALT ~100 KM A C B THEMIS THERMAL IMAGING OF SPIRIT LANDING AREA IN GUSEV CRATER A. SPIRIT LANDING ELLIPSE B. CLOSER VIEW OF SPIRIT LANDING ELLIPSE C. NIGHT IR IMAGE: BRIGHT AREAS ARE MORE ROCKY. ARROW POINTS TO ROCKY SLOPE SPIRIT MOVED TO GUSEV CRATER POSSIBLE LAKE BED IN LARGE BASIN A C B THEMIS THERMAL IMAGING OF OPPORTUNITYLANDING AREA IN MERIDIANI PLANUM A. LANDING ELLIPSE ~120 KM LONG) B. CLOSER VIEW OF LANDING ELLIPSE C. NIGHT IR IMAGE: BRIGHT AREAS ARE MORE ROCKY. ARROW POINTS TO ROCKY SLOPE MAJOR STAGES OF MARS’ EVOLUTION 1 BEGINNING 2 MAGMA OCEAN / CONVECTIVE OVERTURN 3A ? ? CRATERED UPLANDS / VERY LARGE BASINS 3B ? CORE FORMATION/GLOBAL MAGNETIC FIELD 3C 4.5 - 1.3 GLOBAL MAFIC VOLCANISM DENSE WATER / CO2 ATMOSPHERE E ? G 3D EROSION / LAKES / NORTHERN OCEAN A T ? ? S 4 LARGE BASINS CATACLYSM ? THARSIS UPLIFT AND VOLCANISM ? 5 NORTHERN HEMISPHERE BASALTIC / ANDESITIC VOLCANISM ? 1.3 - 0.2 SUBSURFACE HYDROSPHERE / CRYOSPHERE 6 ? PRESENT SURFACE CONDITIONS LUNAR 4.6 4.2? 3.8 ? 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 BILLIONS OF YEARS BEFORE PRESENT ITALICS = SNC DATES RED = MAJOR UNCERTAINTY OLYMPUS TOPOGRAPHY OF MONS THARSIS REGION VALLES MARINERIS THARSIS REGION SHADED RELIEF DETAIL MARS GLOBAL SURVEYOR MOLA OLYMPUS MONS VALLES MARINERIS APOLLO MODEL OF MARS EVOLUTION ELYSIUM MONS ANDESITIC THARSIS EVENTS EXTRUSIONS <3.8 B.Y. THARSIS THICKENING ATMOSPHERE: MAFIC UPPER MANTLE WITH CO2, H20 CRYOSPHERE / INCREASING HYDROSPHERE SI AND FE UPWARDS OLIVINE/ NA- PYROXENE ? ANDESITIC CUMULATE INTRUSIONS? OLIVINE ? CUMULATE RELIC PROTO- GARNET / NA-CPX/ CORE ? NA-BIOTITE?/NA- HORNBLENDE/ ? FExNIySz “RUTILE” (TRANSITION? CORE CUMULATES ? ZONE) RELIC MAGNETIC STRIPING THICKENED SOUTHERN ©Harrison H.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Structures and Events – a Nordic Perspective
    107 by Henning Dypvik1, Jüri Plado2, Claus Heinberg3, Eckart Håkansson4, Lauri J. Pesonen5, Birger Schmitz6, and Selen Raiskila5 Impact structures and events – a Nordic perspective 1 Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1047, Blindern, NO 0316 Oslo, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Geology, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, 51014 Tartu, Estonia. 3 Department of Environmental, Social and Spatial Change, Roskilde University, P.O. Box 260, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark. 4 Department of Geography and Geology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen, Denmark. 5 Division of Geophysics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland. 6 Department of Geology, University of Lund, Sölvegatan 12, SE-22362 Lund, Sweden. Impact cratering is one of the fundamental processes in are the main reason that the Nordic countries are generally well- the formation of the Earth and our planetary system, as mapped. reflected, for example in the surfaces of Mars and the Impact craters came into the focus about 20 years ago and the interest among the Nordic communities has increased during recent Moon. The Earth has been covered by a comparable years. The small Kaalijärv structure of Estonia was the first impact number of impact scars, but due to active geological structure to be confirmed in northern Europe (Table 1; Figures 1 and processes, weathering, sea floor spreading etc, the num- 7). First described in 1794 (Rauch), the meteorite origin of the crater ber of preserved and recognized impact craters on the field (presently 9 craters) was proposed much later in 1919 (Kalju- Earth are limited.
    [Show full text]
  • New Clues from Earth's Most Elusive Impact Crater: Evidence of Reidite in Australasian Tektites from Thailand
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321956231 New clues from Earth's most elusive impact crater: Evidence of reidite in Australasian tektites from Thailand Article in Geology · December 2017 DOI: 10.1130/G39711.1 CITATIONS READS 0 64 4 authors, including: Aaron J. Cavosie Timmons Erickson Curtin University Curtin University 100 PUBLICATIONS 2,285 CITATIONS 27 PUBLICATIONS 159 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Aaron J. Cavosie on 16 March 2018. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. New clues from Earth’s most elusive impact crater: Evidence of reidite in Australasian tektites from Thailand Aaron J. Cavosie1, Nicholas E. Timms1, Timmons M. Erickson2, and Christian Koeberl3,4 1The Institute for Geoscience Research (TIGeR), Department of Applied Geology, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia 2Lunar and Planetary Institute, Universities Space Research Association, Houston, Texas 77058, USA 3Natural History Museum, 1010 Vienna, Austria 4Department of Lithospheric Research, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria ABSTRACT in Australasian tektites from Thailand supports a Australasian tektites are enigmatic drops of siliceous impact melt found in an ~8000 × location for the source crater in Southeast Asia. ~13,000 km strewn field over Southeast Asia and Australia, including sites in both the Indian and Pacific oceans. These tektites formed only 790,000 yr ago from an impact crater estimated MUONG NONG–TYPE TEKTITES to be 40–100 km in diameter; yet remarkably, the young and presumably large structure Muong Nong–type tektites (MN-type, or lay- remains undiscovered.
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Evaporite Karst in an Interior Layered Deposit in Juventae
    International Journal of Speleology 46 (2) 181-189 Tampa, FL (USA) May 2017 Available online at scholarcommons.usf.edu/ijs International Journal of Speleology Off icial Journal of Union Internationale de Spéléologie Possible evaporite karst in an interior layered deposit in Juventae Chasma, Mars Davide Baioni* and Mario Tramontana Planetary Geology Research Group, Dipartimento di Scienze Pure e Applicate (DiSPeA), Università degli Studi di Urbino "Carlo Bo", Campus Scientifico Enrico Mattei, 61029 Urbino (PU), Italy Abstract: This paper describes karst landforms observed in an interior layered deposit (ILD) located within Juventae Chasma a trough of the Valles Marineris, a rift system that belongs to the Tharsis region of Mars. The ILD investigated is characterized by spectral signatures of kieserite, an evaporitic mineral present on Earth. A morphologic and morphometric survey of the ILD surface performed on data of the Orbiter High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) highlighted the presence of depressions of various shapes and sizes. These landforms interpreted as dolines resemble similar karst landforms on Earth and in other regions of Mars. The observed karst landforms suggest the presence of liquid water, probably due to ice melting, in the Amazonian age. Keywords: Mars, interior layered deposits, karst, climate change Received 21 Octomber 2016; Revised 18 April 2017; Accepted 19 April 2017 Citation: Baioni D. and Tramontana M., 2017. Possible evaporite karst in an interior layered deposit in Juventae Chasma, Mars. International Journal of Speleology, 46 (2), 181-189. Tampa, FL (USA) ISSN 0392-6672 https://doi.org/10.5038/1827-806X.46.2.2085 INTRODUCTION north of Valles Marineris (Catling et al., 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • The Recognition of Terrestrial Impact Structures
    Bulletin of the Czech Geological Survey, Vol. 77, No. 4, 253–263, 2002 © Czech Geological Survey, ISSN 1210-3527 The recognition of terrestrial impact structures ANN M. THERRIAULT – RICHARD A. F. GRIEVE – MARK PILKINGTON Natural Resources Canada, Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario, KIA 0ES Canada; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The Earth is the most endogenically active of the terrestrial planets and, thus, has retained the poorest sample of impacts that have occurred throughout geological time. The current known sample consists of approximately 160 impact structures or crater fields. Approximately 30% of known impact structures are buried and were initially detected as geophysical anomalies and subsequently drilled to provide geologic samples. The recognition of terrestrial impact structures may, or may not, come from the discovery of an anomalous quasi-circular topographic, geologic or geo- physical feature. In the geologically active terrestrial environment, anomalous quasi-circular features, however, do not automatically equate with an impact origin. Specific samples must be acquired and the occurrence of shock metamorphism, or, in the case of small craters, meteoritic fragments, must be demonstrated before an impact origin can be confirmed. Shock metamorphism is defined by a progressive destruction of the original rock and mineral structure with increasing shock pressure. Peak shock pressures and temperatures produced by an impact event may reach several hundreds of gigaPascals and several thousand degrees Kelvin, which are far outside the range of endogenic metamorphism. In addition, the application of shock- wave pressures is both sudden and brief. Shock metamorphic effects result from high strain rates, well above the rates of norma l tectonic processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicxulub and the Exploration of Large Peak- Ring Impact Craters Through Scientific Drilling
    Chicxulub and the Exploration of Large Peak- Ring Impact Craters through Scientific Drilling David A. Kring, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, Texas 77058, USA; Philippe Claeys, Analytical, Environmental and Geo-Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels 1050, Belgium; Sean P.S. Gulick, Institute for Geophysics and Dept. of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78758, USA; Joanna V. Morgan and Gareth S. Collins, Dept. of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London SW7 2AZ, UK; and the IODP-ICDP Expedition 364 Science Party. ABSTRACT proving the structure had an impact origin. to assess the depth of origin of the peak- The Chicxulub crater is the only well- The buried structure was confirmed by ring rock types and determine how they preserved peak-ring crater on Earth and seismic surveys conducted in 1996 and were deformed during the crater-forming linked, famously, to the K-T or K-Pg mass 2005 to be a large ~180–200-km–diameter event. That information is needed to effec- impact crater with an intact peak ring tively test how peak-ring craters form on extinction event. For the first time, geolo- (Morgan et al., 1997; Gulick et al., 2008). planetary bodies. gists have drilled into the peak ring of that The discovery of the Chicxulub impact The expedition was also designed to crater in the International Ocean structure initially prompted two scientific measure any hydrothermal alteration in Discovery Program and International drilling campaigns. In the mid-1990s, a the peak ring and physical properties of the Continental Scientific Drilling Program series of shallow onshore wells up to 700 m rocks, such as porosity and permeability, (IODP-ICDP) Expedition 364.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Analysis, Layer Thickness Measurements and Mineralogical Investigation of the Large Interior Layered Deposit Within Ganges Chasma, Valles Marineris, Mars
    STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS, LAYER THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS AND MINERALOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE LARGE INTERIOR LAYERED DEPOSIT WITHIN GANGES CHASMA, VALLES MARINERIS, MARS Alicia Hore, BSc. (Hons.) MSc, Earth Sciences Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Faculty of Earth Sciences, Brock University St. Catharines, Ontario © 2015 Abstract The interior layered deposit (ILD) in Ganges Chasma, Valles Marineris, is a 4.25 km high mound that extends approximately 110 km from west to east. The deposition, deformation, and erosion history of the Ganges ILD records aids in identifying the processes that formed and shaped the Chasma. To interpret structural and geomorphic processes acting on the ILD, multiple layer attitudes and layer thickness transects were conducted on the Ganges ILD. Mineralogical data was analyzed to determine correlations between materials and landforms. Layer thickness measurements indicate that the majority of layers are between 0.5 m and 4 m throughout the ILD. Three major benches dominate the Ganges ILD. Layer thicknesses increase at the ILD benches, suggesting that the benches are formed from the gradual thickening of layers. This indicates that the benches are depositional features draping over basement topography. Layer attitudes indicate overall shallow dips generally confined to a North-South direction that locally appear to follow bench topography. Layering is disrupted on a scale of 40 m to 150 m in 12 separate locations throughout the ILD. In all locations, underlying layering is disturbed by overlying folded layers in a trough-like geometry. These features are interpreted to have formed as submarine channels in a lacustrine setting, subsequently infilled by sediments.
    [Show full text]
  • MICROSTRUCTURAL ANALYSIS of SHOCKED APATITE from the PAASSELKÄ IMPACT STRUCTURE, FINLAND Gavin G
    Large Meteorite Impacts VI 2019 (LPI Contrib. No. 2136) 5073.pdf MICROSTRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF SHOCKED APATITE FROM THE PAASSELKÄ IMPACT STRUCTURE, FINLAND Gavin G. Kenny Department of Geosciences, Swedish Museum of Natural History, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden. ([email protected]) Introduction: Apatite, Ca5(PO4)3(F,Cl,OH), is an Given the lack of a single established match unit for almost ubiquitous accessory mineral that forms in ig- apatite, a range of match units were made in the Twist neous, metamorphic, sedimentary, hydrothermal and module of Oxford Instruments’ HKL Channel 5 soft- biological environments on Earth, as well as a range of ware and trialed on the apatite grains from Paasselkä. settings on other planetary bodies. It is widely applied Data for a range of fluorapatite compositions listed in in geochronology and thermochronology [e.g., 1] and the American Mineralogist crystal structure database has been a particularly powerful tool in tracing abun- (AMCSD) came from [13-21]. Apatite is generally dance of, an processes related to, water and other vola- considered to have the space group P63/m) but all hex- tiles in the inner Solar System [e.g., 2]. However, de- agonal space groups were tested here. spite this, we know relatively little about how this min- Results: Imaging: Six of the seven apatite grains eral responds to the extreme temperatures and pres- identified in the sample display granular recrystalliza- sures associated with impact cratering. tion textures on their exteriors (e.g., Fig. 1A). Howev- In recent years, microstructural analysis of minerals er, granular textures are less readily visible on polished such as zircon [e.g., 3-4], monazite [e.g., 5-6] badde- grain interiors and under the petrographic microscope.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies of the Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure— Introduction and Discussion
    Studies of the Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure— Introduction and Discussion By J. Wright Horton, Jr., David S. Powars, and Gregory S. Gohn Chapter A of Studies of the Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure— The USGS-NASA Langley Corehole, Hampton, Virginia, and Related Coreholes and Geophysical Surveys Edited by J. Wright Horton, Jr., David S. Powars, and Gregory S. Gohn Prepared in cooperation with the Hampton Roads Planning District Commission, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, and National Aeronautics and Space Administration Langley Research Center Professional Paper 1688 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey iii Contents Abstract . .A1 Introduction . 1 Previous Work . 3 The Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure . 5 Form and Structure . 5 Character of the Target . 7 Land Surface Features . 7 The USGS-NASA Langley Core . 9 Significant Results . 11 Crystalline Basement Rocks . 11 Impact-Modified and Impact-Generated Sediments . 11 Postimpact Sediments . 13 Water Depths—Impact and Postimpact . 14 Dating the Impact Event . 14 Structural Interpretation of Seismic Data . 15 Interpretation of Audio-Magnetotelluric (AMT) Soundings . 15 Hydrologic Effects and Water-Resources Implications . 16 Conceptual Model . 16 Acknowledgments . 18 References Cited . 18 Appendix A1. Abstracts of Research on the Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure, 2001–2003 . 24 Figures A1. Regional map showing the location of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure, the USGS-NASA Langley corehole at Hampton, Va., and some other coreholes in southeastern Virginia . A2 A2. Map of southeastern Virginia showing locations of recently completed coreholes and geophysical surveys in relation to the Chesapeake Bay impact structure . .4 A3. Satellite image of Chesapeake Bay showing location of the buried impact structure and nearby Mesozoic to Cenozoic tectonic features.
    [Show full text]