DOCSLIB.ORG

ECOVOLUNTEER EXPERIENCE Beavers in Carpathian Mountains

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ECOVOLUNTEER EXPERIENCE Beavers in Carpathian Mountains ECOVOLUNTEER EXPERIENCE Beavers in Carpathian Mountains, Poland 2010 Co-operation: Carpathian Heritage Society Research Society “Castor” Ecovolunteer Program You can freely download this project file and files on other projects from the homepage for this project within the Ecovolunteer website: http://www.ecovolunteer.org/ (or from the national ecovolunteer domains). As it is necessary for participants in this project to be able to communicate in English, this text is provided only in English. The text of this brochure is developed in cooperation with the project staff. Annually, under the supervision of the staff the text is updated. Nevertheless you may experience some changes in the field compared to the brochure text. It is inherent to wildlife research programs that during the operations incidentally changes are necessary because of unexpected results, behaviour by the wildlife, etc. Be prepared for such changes. (Last update: August 2009) __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ European Beavers / Poland – 2010 Page 1 © http://www.ecovolunteer.org Introduction Many animals modify their immediate environments to meet their needs, but among mammals, only beavers rival human beings in the extent to which they change their landscape. Beavers influence mountain streams through building dams and are influential in maintaining water resources and biodiversity. The absence of this natural engineer caused many problems, and contributed to a reduction in the natural capacity of streams to resist damaging flood events. Consequently, a programme to re-establish populations of beavers in the Carpathians commenced in 1992 and Dr. Andrzej Czech and his team have now released 200 beavers. Many of these beavers built dams and canals but, because of hard mountain conditions, some have left the reintroduction sites. To increase the effectiveness of the reintroduction programme it is important to determine existing territories, evaluate new release sites and monitor the effects of beaver activities. During your stay at the project, you will be in south-eastern corner of Poland - Bieszczady Mountains, and Lesser Beskids (Polish: Beskid Niski), close to the borders with Ukraine and Slovakia, and also within Biosphere Reserve Eastern Carpathians, which is the only tri-lateral Biosphere Reserve in the World. The area is well known for its natural beauties and unique animal and plant life. The activities vary, and include: searching for beavers and signs of their activities in mountain streams, assessment of usefulness of different sections of streams for beavers, research on the influence of beavers on ecosystems (hydrology, effects on other species etc.), reintroducing beavers and searching for effects in the field as well as testing non-lethal methods on solving beaver - human conflicts. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ European Beavers / Poland – 2010 Page 2 © http://www.ecovolunteer.org Contents 1. About beavers ...................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Taxonomy and social organisation ............................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. Distribution .................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.3. Appearance .................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 1.4. Vision, hearing and sense of smell .............................................................................................................................................. 6 1.5. Teeth ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 1.6. Locomotion ................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.7. Scent marking glands ................................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.8. Reproduction and longevity .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.9. Foraging ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 9 1.10. Construction work ..................................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.11. Dispersal and territories ........................................................................................................................................................... 11 1.12. Predators and diseases ............................................................................................................................................................ 11 2. Beavers in Poland .............................................................................................................................. 12 3. The study area ................................................................................................................................... 13 3.1. Bieszczady Mountains and Bieszczady National Park .............................................................................................................. 13 3.2. Lesser Beskids and Magura National Park ............................................................................................................................... 15 4. Carpathian Beaver Project ................................................................................................................. 18 4.1. Background ................................................................................................................................................................................ 18 4.2. Staff ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 18 4.3. General goal of the project ......................................................................................................................................................... 19 4.4. Objectives of the project ............................................................................................................................................................. 19 5. How you may help ............................................................................................................................. 20 5.1. Activities and possibilities ........................................................................................................................................................... 21 6. Travel information ............................................................................................................................ 22 6.1. Dates .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 6.2. Duration ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 6.3. Capacity ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 6.4. Price ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 22 6.5. Accommodation .......................................................................................................................................................................... 23 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ European Beavers / Poland – 2010 Page 3 © http://www.ecovolunteer.org 6.6. Transport to Poland & Meeting .................................................................................................................................................. 23 6.7. Insurance .................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 6.8. Medical services ......................................................................................................................................................................... 24 6.9. Conditions for participation ........................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arts in Wild Felid Conservation Programmes in Poland and in the World
    J Vet Res 63, 457-464, 2019 DOI:10.2478/jvetres-2019-0043 REVIEW ARTICLE ARTs in wild felid conservation programmes in Poland and in the world Joanna Kochan1, Wojciech Niżański2, Nei Moreira3, Zalmir Silvino Cubas4, Agnieszka Nowak1, Sylwia Prochowska2, Agnieszka Partyka2, Wiesława Młodawska1, Józef Skotnicki5 1Institute of Veterinary Science, University of Agriculture in Kraków, 30-059 Kraków, Poland 2Department of Reproduction and Clinic of Farm Animals, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-366 Wrocław, Poland 3Federal University of Paraná, Palotina, PR 85950-000, Brazil 4ITAIPU Binacional, Refúgio Biológico Bela Vista, Foz do Iguaçu, PR 85856-970, Brazil 5City Zoological Park and Garden in Kraków Charitable Foundation, 30-232 Kraków, Poland [email protected] Received: January 11, 2019 Accepted: July 2, 2019 Abstract With the exception of the domestic cat, all felid species (Felidae) are currently threatened with extinction in their natural habitat. To develop effective and optimal wild cat conservation programmes with assisted reproductive technology (ART) it is necessary to combine advances from different disciplines of science, starting from the biology of the species, through research into the population and habitat, assisted reproductive technologies, establishment of gene banks, developing bioinformatic systems, and ending with biodiversity and endangered species management. In the last few years knowledge of felid reproduction has expanded considerably thanks to comparative studies utilising the domestic cat as a research model for endangered wild cats. Basic reproductive techniques utilised in both domestic cat breeding and rescuing wild felid populations that are threatened with extinction include semen collection and cryopreservation, artificial insemination, oocyte collection, in vitro maturation, in vitro fertilisation, somatic cloning, and embryo transfer.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Structure and Land Use Change in the Bieszczady Mountains
    Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Geographisches Institut Studienprojekt und Geländepraktikum Karpaten 2014 Veranstaltungsnummer 34042 Seminarleitung Tobias Kümmerle, Jan Knorn, Patrick Culbert Sommersemester 2014 Forest Structure and Land Use Change in the Bieszczady Mountains Projektarbeit als Modulabschlussprüfung (MAP) Abgabe 14. November 2014 Monobachelor Geographie, 6. Fachsemester Beifach Regionalstudien Asien/Afrika Studienprojekt und Geländepraktikum Karpaten 2014 – MAP Table of contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Materials and Methods .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.1. Study area ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Forest classification ............................................................................................................................ 6 2.3. Sampling Design ................................................................................................................................. 6 2.4. Field Methods ..................................................................................................................................... 7 2.5. Data Analysis .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Population in the Slovak Carpathian Mountains
    Monitoring protocol for the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) population in the Slovak Carpathian Mountains A1. Assessment and selection of sites and lynx for live-capture from the Carpathian source population in Slovakia D1. Monitoring the effects of lynx removal for translocations on the source populations Authors: Kubala J. Smolko P. Klinga P. Tám B. & Kropil R. September 2018 Report for the implementation of action A1 and D1 Realized in the frame of action A1: Assessment and selection of sites and lynx for live-capture from the Carpathian source population in Slovakia Authors: Kubala J. Smolko P. Klinga P. Tám B. & Kropil R. Content 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………….5 2. Objectives and attributes……………………………………………………………….7 3. Survey areas…………………………………………………………………………....7 4. Aims and principles of monitoring……………………………………………………11 5. What will be monitored?................................................................................................11 6. Monitoring network…………………………………………………………………...14 7. Passive monitoring: Collecting a chance (opportunistic information)………………..14 8. Active monitoring: Systematic surveys and monitoring system………………………15 8.1. Snow tracking………………………………………………………………………...15 8.2. Opportunistic and standardized collection of samples for genetic analysis…………..16 8.3. Camera trapping………………………………………………………………….......16 8.3.1. Opportunistic camera trapping……………………………………………………17 8.3.2. Deterministic camera trapping………………………………………………….....18 8.4. Captures and GPS/GSM telemetry…………………………………………………...20 9. Survey, monitoring and capture time-frame…………………………………………..22 References…………………………………………………………………………………….23 Foreword The purpose of this protocol is to provide detailed information about the objectives, attributes, sampling design and data management necessary for the implementation of the actions A1 and D1 within the LIFE LYNX - LIFE16 NAT/SI/000634 Together with the protocol on the A2 action in the Romanian Carpathians - Gazzola et al. (2018) it is required by the need to ensure a technical framework for the LIFE Lynx project team.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transformation of the Natural Environment of The
    / !"# 27 THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT OF THE POLISH AND UKRAINIAN BIESZCZADY MOUNTAINS DUE TO TOURISM AND OTHER FORMS OF HUMAN PRESSURE Agnieszka Œwigost Institute of Urban Development, Krakow, Poland Abstract The area of Bieszczady Mountains is the cross-border zone characterized by a great diversity in both policies and a level of economic development between the Polish and Ukrainian part of the region. Therefore, it exhibits a significant variation in the degree, form and character of anthropopres- sure. The main aim of the study is to compare the intensity of transformation of Polish and Ukrainian parts of Bieszczady Mountains and indicate the anthropogenic conditions existing in both countries. Four villages of Bieszczady were analysed – Solina and Wetlina in Poland and Sianki and Volosjanka in Ukraine. The study, conducted using the point scoring evaluation method, showed large variations in the degree of anthropopressure in different localities. The area that has the lowest level of human impact is Po³onina Wetliñska while the largest one occurs in Solina. Wetlina, Sianki and Volosjanka have a similar level of transformation. Research areas located in the Polish part of Bieszczady are exposed to environmental changes primarily related to the development of tourism. In Ukraine, the pressure is observable due to unregulated water and sewage systems, a large accumulation of possessions with a traditional heating and highly developed railway network. Keywords: anthropopressure; tourism; Polish Bieszczady Mountains; Ukrainian Bieszczady Mountains Introduction rently, research in the field of anthropopressure includes also Contemporary transformations of the natural environment the less visible transformation of the environment caused for are the consequences of not only natural alterations but also instance by tourism development.
    [Show full text]
  • POLAND: COUNTRY REPORT to the FAO INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL CONFERENCE on PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES (Leipzig 1996)
    POLAND: COUNTRY REPORT TO THE FAO INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL CONFERENCE ON PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES (Leipzig 1996) Prepared by: Wieslaw Podyma Barbara Janik-Janiec Radzikow, June 1995 POLAND country report 2 Note by FAO This Country Report has been prepared by the national authorities in the context of the preparatory process for the FAO International Technical Conference on Plant Genetic Resources, Leipzig, Germany, 17-23 June 1996. The Report is being made available by FAO as requested by the International Technical Conference. However, the report is solely the responsibility of the national authorities. The information in this report has not been verified by FAO, and the opinions expressed do not necessarily represent the views or policy of FAO. The designations employed and the presentation of the material and maps in this document do not imply the expression of any option whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. POLAND country report 3 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 THE COUNTRY AND ITS AGRICULTURAL SECTOR 6 1.1 THE COUNTRY 6 1.2 AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN POLAND 8 CHAPTER 2 INDIGENOUS PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES 12 2.1 FLORA OF POLAND 12 2.2 FOREST GENETIC RESOURCES 37 2.3 WILD AND CROPS-RELATED SPECIES 38 2.4 LANDRACES AND OLD CULTIVARS 40 CHAPTER 3 CONSERVATION ACTIVITIES 42 3.1 IN SITU PRESERVATION OF GENETIC RESOURCES 42 3.2 EX SITU COLLECTIONS 45 3.2.1 Sample
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Rural Małopolska
    Traditional Rural Małopolska Catalogue TRADITIONAL RURAL MAŁOPOLSKA Małopolska is a region with a rich historical and cultural, extraordinary natural and landscape values and traditional hospitality famous well out of Poland. The uniqueness and multiculturalism affirm the exceptional qualities of the region. The still vibrant folk culture is the strongest expression of the diversity of Małopolska, where each part has its own specific costumes, dialect, customs and traditions. The same folk culture also manifests itself in the architecture, rural buildings, interior design, farm equipment and regional dishes and products. The publication ‘Traditional Rural Małopolska’, which includes offers from 13 farms and agritourism facilities, is an invitation to come to the Małopolska countryside and learn about the most beautiful folk traditions and rituals that have been cultivated in Małopolska for centuries. Hosts of the facilities are enthusiastic, exceptional and open-minded people, who know and nurture the history and traditions of their ‘Little Homelands’, willingly spend their time with their guests, showing them local monuments, folklore and customs. We look forward to seeing you! FARMS PARTICIPATING IN THE PROGRAMME “TRADITIONAL RURAL MAŁOPOLSKA” 1 ”PSZCZÓŁKI” – Niezwojowice .................................................................................................................................................... 6-7 2 ”GOŚCINA u BABCI” – Zalipie ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Wildlife and Traffic in the Carpathians
    Wildlife and Traffic in the Carpathians Guidelines how to minimize the impact of transport infrastructure development on nature in the Carpathian countries Wildlife and Traffic in the Carpathians Guidelines how to minimize the impact of transport infrastructure development on nature in the Carpathian countries Part of Output 3.2 Planning Toolkit TRANSGREEN Project “Integrated Transport and Green Infrastructure Planning in the Danube-Carpathian Region for the Benefit of People and Nature” Danube Transnational Programme, DTP1-187-3.1 April 2019 Project co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) www.interreg-danube.eu/transgreen Authors Václav Hlaváč (Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, Member of the Carpathian Convention Work- ing Group for Sustainable Transport, co-author of “COST 341 Habitat Fragmentation due to Trans- portation Infrastructure, Wildlife and Traffic, A European Handbook for Identifying Conflicts and Designing Solutions” and “On the permeability of roads for wildlife: a handbook, 2002”) Petr Anděl (Consultant, EVERNIA s.r.o. Liberec, Czech Republic, co-author of “On the permeability of roads for wildlife: a handbook, 2002”) Jitka Matoušová (Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic) Ivo Dostál (Transport Research Centre, Czech Republic) Martin Strnad (Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, specialist in ecological connectivity) Contributors Andriy-Taras Bashta (Biologist, Institute of Ecology of the Carpathians, National Academy of Science in Ukraine) Katarína Gáliková (National
    [Show full text]
  • The Carpathian Mountains: a Refuge for Wildlife and a “Paradise” for the People of Slovakia by Ted Bailey
    Refuge Notebook • Vol. 7, No. 30 • August 5, 2005 The Carpathian Mountains: A refuge for wildlife and a “paradise” for the people of Slovakia by Ted Bailey Although the fireweed was in bloom and brown half the size of state of Kentucky. It is also a relatively bears, wolves, lynx roamed the surrounding forests; new country having gained its most recent indepen- we were not hiking on the Kenai Peninsula or even in dence a mere twelve years ago after the collapse of Alaska. Despite the similarities we were thousands of the Soviet Union. And Slovakia joined the European miles away in Central Europe’s Carpathian Mountains Union in 2004 only a year ago. The huge, stark, tall and in eastern Slovakia. My wife, daughter and I had trav- gray housing complexes built in the country’s largest eled here in July to find four little villages where my cities of Bratislava and Kosice during the communist grandparents lived over a hundred years ago before era contrasted with the beautifully restored old city they emigrated at a young age to America in search centers where Gothic cathedrals and old palaces are of a better life. We eventually found the villages as attractions for visitors. we traveled by car throughout the eastern regions of One day we hiked a trail into the Slovensky Raj, Slovakia known as Spis and Zemplin. Spis is a moun- one of nine national parks and fourteen protected na- tainous region that borders the southern boundary of ture territories in Slovakia. The park was the first pro- Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Bond Report on the Use of Proceeds Green​ Bond​ Report​ On​ The​ Use​ Of​ Proceeds
    GREEN BOND REPORT ON THE USE OF PROCEEDS Poland’s 8-year EUR Green Bond maturing on August 7, 2026 February 2019 Contents Introduction Green Bond details Use of Proceeds Use of Proceeds in detail COP24 in Katowice Erratum to the Green Bond Report on the Use of Proceeds published in December 2017 2 Introduction In December 2016, the Republic of Poland issued its inaugural Green Bond, which, at the same time, was the first sovereign Green Bond in the history. That successful transaction was aimed at financing or refinancing environmen- tal expenditures and hence, fighting the climate change. Many times the Ministry of Finance’s officials stated that Poland wanted to be a repeat issuer on this innovative market. It stressed that it wanted to be an inherent part of a broader pro-environmental community. In response to that, in February 2018, Poland decided to issue Green Bonds for the second time. This time bigger transaction translated into even higher value of green projects to be financed. This report provides details for the Use of Proceeds of the second issuance. It also contains estimation of CO2 avoided as a result of expenditures on Renewa- ble Energy Sector from both Green Bond issues (issued in December 2016 and February 2018). PIOTR NOWAK, UNDERSECRETARY OF STATE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE ”After launching the first issue we focused on allocation of proceeds, but, as time went by, we started to think about the second issue of that type. For sure, we didn’t and still don’t want to be only an occasional issuer on this important market.
    [Show full text]
  • Bieszczady Earthworm Conference
    BIESZCZADY EARTHWORM CONFERENCE University of Rzeszow, Poland University of Central Lancashire, UK Bieszczady National Park Ustrzyki Górne, 3 - 4. 09. 2018 1 Contents 1.0 Introduction. – p.3 2.0 Conference Programme. – p.7 3.0 Abstracts of Presentations and Posters. – p.9 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION Bieszczady is a mountain range that runs from the extreme south-east of Poland through Ukraine and Slovakia. It forms the western part of the Eastern Beskids (Beskidy Wschodnie), and is more generally part of the Outer Eastern Carpathians. The mountain range is situated between the Łupków Pass (640 m) and the Vyshkovskyi Pass (933 m). Frequently Bieszczady refers only to the Western Bieszczady or even only to the part of the range lying within Poland. The highest peak of Bieszczady is Mt. Pikuy (1405 m) in Ukraine. The highest peak of the Polish part is Tarnica (1346 m). History Settled in prehistoric times, the south-eastern Poland region that is now Bieszczady was overrun in pre-Roman times by various tribes, including the Celts, Goths and Vandals (Przeworsk culture and Puchov culture). After the fall of the Roman Empire, of which most of south-eastern Poland was part (all parts below the river San) of Hungarians and West Slavs invaded the area. The region subsequently became part of the Great Moravian state. Upon the invasion of the Hungarian tribes into the heart of the Great Moravian Empire around 899, the Lendians of the area declared their allegiance to the Hungarians. The region then became a site of contention between Poland, Kievan Rus and Hungary starting in at least the 9th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Charcoal in Alluvium of Mountain Streams in the Bieszczady Mountains (Polish Carpathians) As a Carrier of Information on the Local Palaeoenvironment
    GEOCHRONOMETRIA DOI 10.2478/s13386-013-0155-0 Available online at www.springerlink.com CHARCOAL IN ALLUVIUM OF MOUNTAIN STREAMS IN THE BIESZCZADY MOUNTAINS (POLISH CARPATHIANS) AS A CARRIER OF INFORMATION ON THE LOCAL PALAEOENVIRONMENT JÓZEF KUKULAK Institute of Geography, Pedagogical University, 2 Podchorążych Str., 30-084 Cracow, Poland Received 2 September 2013 Accepted 20 January 2014 Abstract: Fragments of charcoal are present in floodplain alluvium of the San and Strwiąż rivers in the Polish part of the Bieszczady Mountains, Polish East Carpathians. They occur as single clasts or in lenses in the basal part of fine-grained alluvium, together with unburnt wood debris, or in the mid- dle part of the vertical sequence of the floodplain alluvium. 14 samples of charcoal from the upper courses of the San (ca. 50 km) and the Strwiąż (ca. 10 km) were dated with radiocarbon. The ob- tained dates fall mainly in the 15th through 19th century interval; only one sample is markedly older (9th–10th century). Taxonomic composition of the charcoal source wood was also studied and com- pared with that of coeval forests. Correlation of the charcoal age with the history of economic devel- opment of the studied region indicates that charcoal is of anthropogenic origin: older charcoal from intense slash-and-burn deforestation, while younger charcoal was produced by local industries. Keywords: charcoal, alluvium, slash-and-burn agriculture, Bieszczady Mountains. 1. INTRODUCTION Mineral components of fire debris include baked clay (from burned forests or meadows, from clay daub on ovens Charcoal is one of components of debris left by fires or cellar walls), as well as ceramic, glassy or metallic sin- which involved wood.
    [Show full text]
  • Malacocenoses of Five Beech Forests in Poland
    Vol. 13(4): 181–188 MALACOCENOSES OF FIVE BEECH FORESTS IN POLAND KRYSTYNA SZYBIAK,MA£GORZATA LEŒNIEWSKA Department of General Zoology, Institute of Environmental Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Fredry 10, 61-701 Poznañ, Poland (e-mail: [email protected]) ABSTRACT: Eighty species of terrestrial gastropods were found in five beech forests in Poland: in two forests of W. Pomeranian Lakeland 36 species, in Wielkopolska 30 species, in Carpathian beech forests of the Pieniny Mts 49 species and in the Beskid Niski Mts 26 species. The mean density in the beech forests in the Pieniny, Beskid Niski, Wielkopolska, acid and rich beechwood of W. Pomeranian Lakeland was 185, 86, 36, 36 and 10 indiv. m-2, respectively. Dominant species in the Pieniny and Beskid Niski were Aegopinella pura (Alder), Carychium tridentatum (Risso), and in the lowland forests Discus rotundatus (O.F. Müller) and Aegopinella nitidula (Draparnaud). European elements and forest species dominated in such habitats. Montane beech for- ests showed a higher species diversity compared to lowland forests. The Carpathian beech forest in the Pieniny Mts had the highest mean density, number of species and species diversity. Aegopinella pura, Vitrea crystallina (O.F. Müller), Discus rotundatus and Cochlodina laminata (Montagu) can be regarded as indicator species of beech forests. KEY WORDS: terrestrial gastropods, beech forests, W. Pomeranian Lakeland, Wielkopolska, Pieniny, Beskid Niski, Poland INTRODUCTION The structure of malacocenoses of beech forests in BIAK 2000, 2002, SZYBIAK et al. 2005a, b) (Fig. 1). The various regions of Poland was studied in 1985–2002. aim of this paper was to analyse the species diversity They included the forests of W.
    [Show full text]