The "Dog-Man": Race, Sex, Species, and Lineage in Coetzee's "Disgrace" Author(s): Deirdre Coleman Source: Twentieth Century Literature, Vol. 55, No. 4, Darwin and Literary Studies (winter 2009), pp. 597-617 Published by: Hofstra University Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25733433 Accessed: 11-08-2016 23:45 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. Hofstra University, Duke University Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Twentieth Century Literature This content downloaded from 165.123.34.86 on Thu, 11 Aug 2016 23:45:28 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms m The "Dog-Man": Race, Sex, Species, and Lineage in Coetzee's Disgrace Deirdre Coleman In J. M. Coetzee's most recent novel, Summertime, Sophie Denoel, one of the characters interviewed for a Active posthumous biography of Coetzee, comments that the author took a "rather abstract, rather anthropological attitude" toward black South Africa. She continues: "He had no feeling for black South Africans. They might be his fellow citizens but they were not his countrymen ... at the back of his mind they continued to be they as opposed to us" (232; italics in original).1 Sophie's description of the fictional Coetzee's "anthropological attitude" recalls the figure of David Lurie in Disgrace, puzzling over his daughter's African neighbor, Petrus.