Characterization of Uranium Redox State in Organic-Rich Eocene Sediments
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
1 Characterization of uranium redox state in organic-rich Eocene sediments 2 3 Susan A Cumberland1,2,3, Barbara Etschmann2, Joël Brugger2, Grant Douglas4, Katy Evans5, 4 Louise Fisher6, Peter Kappen3, John W. Moreau1 5 1 School of Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3100, Australia 6 2 School of Earth, Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, Clayton 3800, Victoria, 7 Australia 8 3 ANSTO Australian Synchrotron, 800 Blackburn Road, Clayton 3168, Victoria, Australia 9 4 CSIRO Land and Water, Floreat, Western Australia, Australia 10 5 Western Australian School of Mines, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, 11 Australia 12 6 CSIRO Mineral Resources, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia 13 14 Abstract 15 The presence of organic matter (OM) has a profound impact on uranium (U) redox cycling, 16 either limiting or promoting the mobility of U via binding, reduction, or complexation. To 17 understand the interactions between OM and U, we characterised U oxidation state and 18 speciation in nine OM-rich sediment cores (18 samples), plus a lignite sample from the 19 Mulga Rock polymetallic deposit in Western Australia. Uranium was unevenly dispersed 20 within the analysed samples with 84% of the total U occurring in samples containing 21 >21 wt. % OM. Analyses of U speciation, including x-ray absorption spectroscopy and 22 bicarbonate extractions, revealed that U existed predominately (~71%) as U(VI), despite the 23 low pH (4.5) and nominally reducing conditions within the sediments. Furthermore, low 1 24 extractability by water, but high extractability by a bi-carbonate solution, indicated a strong 25 association of U with particulate OM. The unexpectedly high proportion of U(VI) relative to 26 U(IV) within the OM-rich sediments implies that OM itself does not readily reduce U, and 27 the reduction of U is not a requirement for immobilising uranium in OM-rich deposits. The 28 fact that OM can play a significant role in limiting the mobility and reduction of U(VI) in 29 sediments is important for both U-mining and remediation. 30 Keywords: Mulga Rock, uranium, mobility, organic matter, oxidation state, x-ray 31 absorption spectroscopy. 32 Highlights 33 84% of U in Mulga Rock OM-bearing sediments occurred within the OM-richest 34 samples (>21% total organic carbon; 9 of 18 samples). 35 71% of U was present in the U(VI) oxidation state. 36 Higher proportions of U occur as U(VI) in mature OM-rich sediments than previously 37 thought. 38 OM strongly complexes U(VI), limiting its mobility and reactivity. 39 U reduction processes are not ubiquitous within OM-rich sediments. 40 1 Introduction 41 The mobility of uranium (U) in natural environments is controlled by its oxidation state and VI 2+ 42 solubility, with the uranyl ion (U O2 ) generally more soluble than U(IV). Ligands such as 2- - 3- 2- 43 CO3 , OH , PO4 and SO4 can either increase (via formation of stable aqueous complexes) 44 or decrease (via formation of insoluble minerals) U mobility (Cumberland et al., 2016). 45 Uranium mobility is also influenced by organic matter (OM) in both dissolved and 46 colloidal/particulate forms (Wood, 1996; Cumberland et al., 2016). Depending on pH, 2 47 dissolved OM such as humic and fulvic acids can bind U, facilitate its transportation, and 48 prevent its sorption to mineral surfaces (Luo and Gu, 2008; Zhao et al., 2012; Tinnacher et 49 al., 2013). In contrast, particulate or solid phase OM can adsorb and accumulate U, resulting 50 in the formation of OM-rich sedimentary U deposits (Greenwood et al., 2013; Cumberland 51 et al., 2016). While considerable information exists on U mobility in inorganic systems 52 (Grenthe et al., 2004), datasets for organic-rich systems are comparatively deficient (Bargar 53 et al., 2013). The complex molecular-scale associations of U and OM, and the impact of OM 54 on U mobility/immobilisation, are still being unravelled (Bargar et al., 2013). These 55 knowledge gaps limit development of in situ mining technologies (Zammit et al., 2014), as 56 well as environmental management and remediation strategies for U mining sites. 57 Recent studies have been directed towards understanding U mobility in OM-rich modern 58 sediments, including the pathways through which U potentially accumulates (Tokunaga et 59 al., 2005; Law et al., 2011). Peat, for example, can concentrate U by up to factor of 10,000 60 from groundwater containing ppb level U concentrations (e.g. (Idiz et al., 1986; Read et al., 61 1993; Owen and Otton, 1995; Lidman et al., 2012)). Bryan et al. (2012) and Warwick et al. 62 (2005) identified U sorption to carboxylic and phenolic functional groups on insoluble 63 humics and fulvics as the likely scavenging mechanism. Furthermore, U accumulation in 64 peat and other OM-rich environments is commonly conceptualised as involving initial U(VI) 65 adsorption followed by reduction to U(IV), with the latter process resulting in long-term U 66 immobilisation (Spirakis, 1996). A suite of factors may facilitate U reduction in sediments, 2+ 67 including increased temperature (Nakashima 1992), electron donors such as H2S or Fe , and 68 direct enzymatic reduction (Newsome et al., 2014; Campbell et al., 2015). Mineral surfaces 69 (e.g., pyrite; Fe-Ti-oxides) and insoluble OM may also play roles in reduction of sorbed U(VI), 3 70 catalysing rate-limiting reaction steps by facilitating electron transfer from underlying 71 material or co-adsorbates (Renock et al., 2013; Latta et al., 2014). Most U in fossil economic 72 U deposits, including OM-rich types (Min et al., 2000; Deditius et al., 2008), has been 73 assumed to be associated with U(IV)-minerals, such as coffinite, or other non-crystalline 74 forms (Bhattacharyya et al., 2017). Interestingly, synchrotron X-ray absorption spectroscopy 75 (XAS) data have revealed the presence of both U(IV) and U(VI) in some OM-rich U deposits, 76 with U(IV) constituting of 35-68% of total U (Mikutta et al., 2016). Regenspurg et al. (2010) 77 found a mixture of U(VI) and U(IV) in alpine soils from the Dischma Valley (Switzerland), 78 based on combined carbonate extractions and data from X-ray Absorption Near Edge 79 Structure (XANES) analyses. These results point to U(VI) being an important component of 80 U bound to OM surfaces. From these recent findings, a picture is emerging for U-OM 81 association in modern sediments that emphasizes the complexity and variability of U redox 82 state and chemical speciation (Mikutta et al., 2016; Bone et al., 2017). 83 Synchrotron x-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) provides a suitable analytical technique for 84 obtaining U-oxidation state and speciation in OM-rich sediments, since it is sensitive to both 85 ‘invisible’ (e.g., colloidal; adsorbed; associated with OM, typically sub > 10 nm) and mineral- 86 bound U (Denecke et al., 1998a; Denecke et al., 1998b; Mikutta et al., 2016; Bhattacharyya 87 et al., 2017). XAS can be applied to samples with a complex composition and containing a 88 wide range of U concentrations (from a few ppm to wt.%). Here our objective was to 89 characterise the physical and chemical nature of U within an OM-rich Eocene sedimentary U 90 deposit, Mulga Rock (Western Australia), in order to determine the relative abundance and 91 origins of observed U(IV) or U(VI). Our results inform strategies for sustainable mining 4 92 (subsurface extraction) or environmental remediation of U in OM-rich sedimentary or 93 aqueous environments. 94 2 Geological setting and core sampling 95 The Mulga Rock (MR) U deposit is located near Kalgoorlie (Western Australia; Figure 1), 96 hosted within a series of paleochannels and lacustrine beds formed during the Eocene (56- 97 34 Ma), now buried to shallow depths (30 to 50 m). According to the petrographic analyses 98 of Jaraula et al. (2015), MR sediments contain a mixture of particulate and non-particulate 99 OM consisting of woody (lignite) material combined with aquatic algal and bacterial 100 biomass, consistent with accumulation from a combination of forested, wetland and 101 lacustrine environments. Over time, the OM layers and deeper sediments became anoxic, 102 with considerable evidence for microbial production of authigenic minerals, most 103 prominently Fe-sulphides. Uranium accumulation likely resulted from groundwater flow 104 through permeable sandstones within palaeochannels, and scavenging of the carried U 105 (present day average 8 µg L-1 U in local groundwater) by OM-rich layers (Douglas et al., 106 2011; Jaraula et al., 2015). U-Pb isotope systematics and U-Th disequilibria studies suggest 107 that U and the associated metals originated from local lamproitic or carbonatitic sources 108 (Douglas et al., 2011; Jaraula et al., 2015). 5 109 110 111 Figure 1. Map of Mulga Rock, deposit sites, core locations and detail from core 5613 112 showing lithology, oxidation state and radioactivity (obtained from down-hole gamma log 113 counts (Vimy, 2014)). See also SI Table 1 for locations. 114 To date, four orebodies with potential U resources have been delineated at MR: 115 Ambassador, Emperor, Princess and Shogun (Figure 1). Ambassador, discovered in 1979, has 116 been the main subject of industry and academic investigations, with resources estimated at 117 13,000 tonnes U (Douglas et al., 1993; Douglas et al., 2011). The most recent orebody, 118 Princess, was discovered in March 2012. The wider MR deposit is estimated to contain -1 119 66.5 MT of ore at 520 mg kg U3O8 (Vimy, 2016c). The geological setting and close 120 association of U with OM-rich sediments at MR make it an excellent site for studying the 121 nature of U in ore-grade OM-rich environments.