Highway-Affecting Landslides of The
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Neogene-Quaternary Tectonics and Volcanism of Southern Jackson Hole, Wyoming and Southeastern Idaho
Lageson and others -- Neogene-Quaternary Tectonics and Volcanism 115 Neogene-Quaternary Tectonics and Volcanism of Southern Jackson Hole, Wyoming and Southeastern Idaho David R. Lageson Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717 David C. Adams Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717 Lisa Morgan U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, MS-966, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225 Kenneth L. Pierce U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, MS-980, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225 Robert B. Smith Department of Geology and Geophysics, 717 W.C. Browning Building, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 INTRODUCTION This field trip guide focuses on the region south of the Snake volcanic rocks of the Snake River Plain Yellowstone region River Plain between Pocatello, Idaho and Jackson, Wyoming (Fig. (Adams, 1997). The second aspect involves a reinterpretation of 1). Our intent is not to rewrite the excellent geologic field guides large slide blocks found primarily within the Grand-Swan Valley that have already been published (e.g., Love and Reed, 1971; of southeast Idaho. We (Morgan and Lageson) suggest an alter- Love and Love, 1983; Love and Love, 1988; Love, 1989; Smith native hypothesis to the slow creep model of emplacement and Downs, 1989; Smith et al., 1990; Pierce and Good, 1992; (Boyer and Hossack, 1992), namely that some slide blocks may Good and Pierce, 1996), but rather to synthesize regional tec- have been emplaced catastrophically during large magnitude earth- tonic relations and present new information relative to the mag- quakes associated with large-volume silicic eruptions in the Heise matic and structural history of the region. -
Pleistocene Glaciation of the Jackson Hole Area, Wyoming
Pleistocene Glaciation of the Jackson Hole Area, Wyoming Professional Paper 1835 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Pinedale-1 glacial moraine deposited by the Buffalo Fork lobe of the Greater Yellowstone Glacial System that headed 50 kilometers (30 miles) to the northeast in the high Absaroka Range. The flat surface in the middle distance is the Pinedale-1 outwash terrace. On this side of this flat terrace is a deep glacial kettle formed by the melting of a large block of glacial ice buried in this outwash gravel. The distant bench is on the far side of the Snake River (not visible) and is a Pinedale-2 terrace deposited by outwash from the Yellowstone Plateau ice cap. The Teton Range forms the skyline with Grand Teton the highest peak. Although the Teton Range has dramatic glacial features, the greatest effect on the surficial geology of Jackson Hole was that produced by the large glacial lobes that advanced into Jackson Hole along the southern margin of the Greater Yellowstone Glacial System. Pleistocene Glaciation of the Jackson Hole Area, Wyoming By Kenneth L. Pierce, Joseph M. Licciardi, John M. Good, and Cheryl Jaworowski Professional Paper 1835 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey William H. Werkheiser, Deputy Director exercising the authority of the Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2018 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. -
JHWF Wildlife Vehicle Collision Database Summary Report FINAL
Jackson Hole Wildlife Foundation’s Teton County Wildlife-Vehicle Collision Database Summary Report February 2015 Copyright Mark Gocke Prepared by: Paul Hood, Alyson Courtemanch, and Cory Hatch Jackson Hole Wildlife Foundation Nature Mapping Jackson Hole Program P.O. Box 8042, Jackson, Wyoming 83002 Acknowledgements Funding support was provided by the Meg and Bert Raynes Wildlife Fund and Community Foundation of Jackson Hole. The project was administered by the Jackson Hole Wildlife Foundation and the Nature Mapping Scientific Advisory Committee. Morgan Graham of Teton Science Schools Teton Research Institute compiled the data and developed and vetted the database. The Wyoming Department of Transportation, Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Jackson Hole Wildlife Foundation, and Nature Mapping Jackson Hole contributed data. Thank you to the citizen scientists that collected data for Nature Mapping Jackson Hole and the Jackson Hole Wildlife Foundation’s Roadkill Hotline. Megan Smith developed the project concept and completed the original grant proposal. Leigh Work, formerly of the Jackson Hole Wildlife Foundation, administered grants for the project. Funding support provided by: Meg and Bert Raynes Wildlife Fund, Community Foundation of Jackson Hole, and Teton Science Schools Teton Research Institute Recommended Citation Hood, P., Courtemanch, A.B., and M.C. Hatch. 2014. Teton County Wildlife-Vehicle Collision Database Summary Report. Jackson Hole Wildlife Foundation, Jackson, Wyoming, USA. 17 pp. i Table of Contents Abstract 1 Introduction -
Path 22 West Bridge Project
PROJECT MANUAL PATH 22 WEST BRIDGE PROJECT PREPARED FOR: TETON COUNTY, WYOMING PREPARED BY: NELSON ENGINEERING P.O. BOX 1599/430 SOUTH CACHE STREET JACKSON, WY 83001 IN ASSOCIATION WITH: HNTB 715 KIRK DRIVE KANSAS CITY, MO 64105 SINCLAIR BUCKSTAFF, JR., WY PE 6619 PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT NO. 10-124-02 JANUARY 2013 SET NO. SECTION 00010 TETON COUNTY, WYOMING PATH 22 WEST BRIDGE PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS 00100 ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS 00200 INSTRUCTION TO BIDDERS 00210 ADDENDUM 00410 BID FORM 00435 BID BOND 00450 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS 00455 PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS 00510 NOTICE OF AWARD 00520 AGREEMENT 00610 PERFORMANCE BOND 00615 PAYMENT BOND 00650 NOTICE TO PROCEED 00660 CONTRACTOR’S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT 00665 CHANGE ORDER 00675 WORK CHANGE DIRECTIVE 00680 EVIDENCE OF PAYMENT AND WAIVER OF CLAIMS 00690 CERTIFICATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION GENERAL CONDITIONS (EJCDC), 2002 EDITION 00700 GENERAL CONDITIONS SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS 00800 SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS SPECIAL PROVISIONS --------- SPECIAL PROVISIONS (WITH INDEX) 00010-1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS --------- WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION (WYDOT SSRBC), 2003 EDITION (BY REFERENCE) GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT --------- GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT PERMITS --------- PERMITS (WITH INDEX) ROSTER OF DRAWINGS --------- INDEX, CIVIL DRAWINGS --------- INDEX, BRIDGE DRAWINGS 00010-2 SECTION 00100 ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS Notice is hereby given that Teton County, Wyoming is accepting sealed bids for a general contract to consist of construction of the Path 22 West Bridge Project. The project is generally described as the construction of a pathway bridge across the Snake River, installation of conduit for a future gas line to be affixed to the under-decking of the bridge, associated grading, and appurtenances thereto. -
Teton Pass Trail Last Summer
Teton Basin P.O. Box 777 Ranger Driggs, ID 83422 District File Code: 1950/2350 Date: August 5, 2002 Greetings: You received the preliminary Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Teton Pass Trail last summer. The Teton Pass Trail project includes segments on National Forest System lands and lands administered by Teton County, Idaho, the City of Victor, Idaho and Teton County Wyoming. In the enclosed decision document, I am only making a decision regarding the Teton Pass trail segments located on National Forest System land for the Caribou Targhee National Forest and the Bridger-Teton National Forest. Teton County Idaho and the City of Victor will decide which trail alternative to adopt on the non-Forest segment located in Idaho. Teton County Wyoming will decide on which trail alternative to adopt on the non-Forest segment located in Wyoming. However, because federal highway funding is being used for this project, the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) included in this decision considers the entire project including non-Forest trail segments. I have reviewed the public comments you sent regarding the EA and selected Alternative C (Recreation Enhancements) with some elements of Alternative A (High Standard Trail). My decision will not include a continuous trail over Teton Pass but will improve recreational opportunities. My decision includes those elements where improvements would not result in high or uncertain environmental impacts. The decision notice provides a complete description of my decision. It is also my decision to change the access management for the Teton Pass area that is currently under Targhee Revised Forest Plan prescription 2.1.2 Visual Quality Maintenance, to non- motorized during the snow season. -
An Assessment of Wildlife-Transportation Issues in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem FINAL REPORT
An Assessment of Wildlife-Transportation Issues in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem FINAL REPORT by Amanda Hardy Research Ecologist Western Transportation Institute College of Engineering, Montana State University Bozeman, Montana 59717 In collaboration with Steve Willer & Elizabeth Roberts-Williamson Conservation Geographic Information Systems Specialists American Wildlands, Geographic Information Systems Lab 40 East Main Street, Suite 2 Bozeman, Montana 59715 A report prepared for the Greater Yellowstone Coalition 13 S. Willson, Suite 2 P.O. Box 1874 Bozeman, MT 59771 January 8, 2007 An Assessment of Wildlife-Transportation Interactions in the GYE Disclaimer DISCLAIMER The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Greater Yellowstone Coalition, Montana State University, or any of the agencies contacted for information summarized in this report. Alternative accessible formats of this document will be provided upon request. Persons with disabilities who need an alternative accessible format of this information, or who require some other reasonable accommodation to participate, should contact Kate Heidkamp, Communications and Information Systems Manager, Western Transportation Institute, Montana State University- Bozeman, PO Box 173910, Bozeman, MT 59717-3910, telephone number 406-994-7018, e- mail: [email protected]. To use animal-vehicle collision data obtained from the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT), the authors respectfully abide by MDT’s requirement of adherence to confidentiality interests, as follows: “By opening this data [delivered in a sealed envelope] you acknowledge that you understand that this information may be confidential under provisions of 23 U.S.C. 409. You also accept the State’s confidentiality interest. -
Final Environmental Impact Statement
Jackson South Teton County Final Environmental Impact Statement Prepared for: Prepared by: August 2010 Jackson South Final Environmental Impact Statement Information Availability The following individuals may be contacted for further information regarding the proposed project and the Environmental Impact Statement. • Mr. Timothy Stark Wyoming Department of Transportation Environmental Services P.O. Box 1708 Cheyenne, Wyoming 82003-1708 Fax: 307-777-4193 E-mail: [email protected] • Mr. Lee Potter, P.E. Federal Highway Administration 2617 E. Lincoln Way, Suite D Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001-5662 Jackson South Final Environmental Impact Statement Table of Contents Page No. Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................................ES-1 ES1. Introduction................................................................................................................ES-1 ES2. Study Background......................................................................................................ES-1 ES3. Transportation Needs ................................................................................................ES-1 ES4. Alternatives.................................................................................................................ES-3 No-Action Alternative................................................................................................ES-3 Build Alternatives.......................................................................................................ES-4