Koalas and Kangaroos: Managing Australia's Charismatic Icons on The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Koalas and Kangaroos: Managing Australia's Charismatic Icons on The UC Agriculture & Natural Resources Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference Title Koalas and Kangaroos: Managing Australia’s Charismatic Icons on the World’s Stage Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2v98b7s3 Journal Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference, 22(22) ISSN 0507-6773 Author Herbert, Catherine A. Publication Date 2006 DOI 10.5070/V422110234 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Koalas and Kangaroos: Managing Australia’s Charismatic Icons on the World’s Stage CatherineA.Herbert KoalaandKangarooContraceptionProgram,SchoolofBiological,Earth&EnvironmentalSciences,Universityof NewSouthWales,Sydney,Australia ABSTRACT :Themanagementofoverabundantnativemammalsisacontentiousissue.InAustralia,thisisexemplifiedbythe managementof kangaroos andkoalas.Theiconicstatusof these species, nationally and internationally, greatlyinfluences the perception of acceptable wildlife management practices. Lethal control techniques now face widespread opposition. This has resulted in research and development of alternative management strategies, with emphasis on potential fertility control agents. AustralianResearchCouncilFundingin2005supportedtheformationofanewinitiative:TheKoalaandKangarooContraception Program.Overthelast7years,ourresearchgrouphasbeentestingtheeffectsofalong-actingcontraceptiveimplant(Suprelorin ®, Peptech Animal Health), containing the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist deslorelin, on kangaroos and koalas. Withinthelastyear,wehavecommencedlarge-scalefieldtrialsontwospecies:koalasonKangarooIsland,SouthAustralia;and tammarwallabiesontheAbrolhosIslands,WesternAustralia.Thesefieldtrialsaimtoevaluatetheefficacyofusinglong-acting contraception to control marsupial populations and will measure the effects of contraception at the individual, population, and environmentallevel.Thisisparalleledbydevelopmentofaremotedeliverysystemthatwillgreatlyenhancetheefficacyofthis formofpopulationmanagement. KEYWORDS :Australia, contraception,deslorelin,fertilitycontrol,GnRHagonist,greykangaroo,koala, Macropus spp., marsupial, Phascolarctoscinereus ,reproduction,tammarwallaby Proc.22 nd Vertebr.PestConf. (R.M.TimmandJ.M.O’Brien,Eds.) PublishedatUniv.ofCalif.,Davis. 2006. Pp.17-22. INTRODUCTION OVERABUNDANTMARSUPIALPOPULATIONS Since the onset of European settlement in Australia, When discussing overabundant populations, it is marsupial populations have fluctuated greatly. The important to remember that the term “overabundant” combinedimpactsofhabitatclearanceandfragmentation; cannotbeclearlydefinedbybiologicalparameters.Itisa introduction of exotic predators, competitors, and value-ladentermthatmeansdifferentthingstodifferent diseases;alteredfireandlandmanagementregimes;and people.Assuch,thefactorsthatcontributetooverabun- huntinghavegenerallyworkedtocauseareductioninthe dantpopulationsmaybetangible(e.g.,alterationstothe range and status of many indigenous marsupial species environment) or intangible (e.g., people’s perceptions, (Maxwell etal .1996).However,attheotherendofthe which may vary over time). In general, the factors scalearesomemarsupialpopulationsthatareconsidered influencingmarsupialoverabundanceinclude: overabundantatalocalorregionallevel.Insomecases 1. Isolationofpopulationsbyhabitatfragmentation/ thesespeciesareclassedassecurethroughouttheirrange fencing (e.g., the large kangaroo species), while in other cases 2. Successofconservationprograms,e.g.,wallabiesin there are geographic and temporal variations in status WA,koalas (e.g.,koalasandsomesmallwallabyspecies). 3. Removal/controlofpredators Themanagementofoverabundantmarsupialpopula- 4. Supplyofadditionalenvironmentalresources tions in Australia presents wildlife managers with 5. Changingperceptions/attitudes numerous challenges. The prevailing socio-political 6. Conflictwithhumans–marsupialsmayonly climate is such that lethal control techniques are often becomeviewedasoverabundant(i.e.,thereisthe deemed unacceptable for these populations (Adderton impetustoactivelymanagethem)whentheyareat Herbert 2004), particularly in the case of koalas oddswithhumans(e.g.,landusage,damageto (Phascolarctos cinereus ). This has resulted in research crops) and development of alternative ways to control The relative importance of these six factors, as they populationsbyreducingthefertilityofanimalswithinthe pertain to kangaroos, wallabies and koalas, are briefly population(fertilitycontrol). discussedbelow,alongwiththemanagementchallenges Theaimsofthispaperareto1)summarisethefactors foreachofthesetaxa. associated with burgeoning marsupial populations, 2) discuss the challenges of managing overabundant Kangaroos marsupials in Australia, 3) outline the effects of a new European settlement has generally had a negative long-acting contraceptive implant (Suprelorin ®) on impact on the smaller macropodids, with severe range marsupials,and4)introduceanewresearchproject:The constrictionsand/orextinctionofspeciesnotuncommon KoalaandKangarooContraceptionProgram(KKCP). (Maxwell etal .1996).Butthelargerkangaroospecies, 17 includingtheredkangaroo( Macropusrufus )andeastern marsupials that were only recently classified as and western grey kangaroos ( M. giganteus and M. threatened,forexample,tammarwallabies( M.eugenii ), fuliginosus ,respectively),arewidespreadacrossAustralia woylies( Bettongiapenicillataogilbyi ),andblack-flanked andappeartohaveflourished.Thesespeciesarebelieved rock-wallabies ( Petrogale lateralis ) (Orell 2004). to have increased in number and range since European Woylies and tammar wallabies were de-listed from the settlement,asaresultofprotectionfrompredationbythe IUCNthreatcategoriesanddown-gradedtoLowerRisk “dingo fence” and provision of watering points and (nearthreatened)in1996and1998respectively(Mawson improvedpastureassociatedwithagriculture(Popleand 2004). Grigg1999). When large kangaroo populations conflict with agriculturalventuresinruralareas,thestategovernment wildlife management agencies will grant permits that allowforthedestructionofkangaroosunderastrictquota system, based on annual population estimations (Pople Northern and Grigg 1999). Culling of these kangaroos must Territory conform to the Code of Practice for the Humane Queensland DestructionofKangaroos(Anon.1994),whichstatesthat kangaroosmustbeshotto“ensureasuddenandpainless Western deathfortargetanimals”. Australia South Kangarooscanalsoreachhighpopulationdensitiesin Australia 1 naturereservesandurbanareas.Inmanyinstances,these NewSouth 5 populationsaredeliberatelyorinadvertentlyconfined,so 2 Wales thatthegrowingpopulationhasnowheretodisperse(for 3 6 16 4 reviewseeCoulson1998,AddertonHerbert2004).The 7 15 8 Victoria use of culling to control populations in these areas 9 14 13 receivesverylittlepublicsupport.Inaddition,theuseof 11 12 high-velocity projectiles tohumanely kill kangaroos via 10 culling would pose a serious human safety issue near urbanareas.Assuch,therehasbeenincreasinginterestin the use of fertility control to manage urban kangaroo Figure1.Thelocationofsomeoverabundantmarsupial populations(Nave etal .2002 b;Herbert etal .2004,2005, populationsinAustralia:circle,koalapopulations; 2006). A good example of this is the management of square,kangaroopopulations;triangle,wallaby populations.Detailsofthespecificpopulationscanbe kangaroos on a housing development site in Western foundinTable1.Thepopulationspresentedarethose Sydney. Approximately 600 ha of the 1,545-ha site, wherefertilitycontroltechnologymayberelevantto containing2,275-3,200easterngreyand248-448red management. kangaroos, is scheduled for development over the next decade. The kangaroo density needs to be reduced to account for the progressive loss of habitat, particularly Table1.Locationofmarsupialpopulationspresentedin feeding areas, as the development progresses and to Figure1. ensurekangaroosdonotdamageathreatenedecological Wallabies Koalas Kangaroos communityonthesite.Cullingwasinitiallyproposedto A 14.Outer 1.NorthIs. 7.KangarooIs. reduce the population (ERM 2003), but widespread Melbourne public and political opposition has resulted in the B 8.TowerHillWildlife 15.Canberra 2.RottnestIs. development of an adaptive management plan focusing Reserve (ACT) predominantlyontheuseoffertilitycontroltoreducethe 3.GardenIs. A 9.MtEcclesNP 16.StMarys population density. Fertility control will involve both 4.PerupForest A 10.Framlingham ® contraception (Suprelroin implants, discussed in more 5.Mt.CarolineNR C 11.FrenchIs.NP detail below) and surgical sterilization (tubal ligation or 6.TutanningNR A 12.SnakeIs. ovariectomy) of females (Cumberland Ecology 2004). 7.KangarooIs. A 13.RaymondIs. The location of this and other peri-urban sites with Atammarwallaby,Bquokka,Cblack-flankedrockwallaby overabundantkangaroopopulationsisshowninFigure1, withaccompanyinglocationsnotedinTable1. Thedramaticincreaseinpopulationsizeandrangeof various wallaby species has created some issues of Wallabies overabundance at a local scale. For example, tammar Over the last decade, a new marsupial management wallaby populations at Tutanning Nature Reserve and challenge has emerged– the management of macropod Perup Forest (for locations see Figure 1, Table 1) have populations recovering after the reduction of introduced increaseddramatically,causingdamagetocerealcropson predators. Western Australia (W.A.) has made a adjacent land (Mawson 2004). Wide-scale habitat significantinvestmentinfoxcontrolundertakenaspartof fragmentation in these areas means that the increasing
Recommended publications
  • Tammar Wallaby Macropus Eugenii (Desmarest, 1817)
    Tammar Wallaby Macropus eugenii (Desmarest, 1817) Description Dark, grizzled grey-brown above, becoming rufous on the sides of the body and the limbs, especially in males. Pale grey-buff below. Other Common Names Dama Wallaby (South Australia) Distribution The Western Australian subspecies of the Tammar Wallaby was previously distributed throughout most of the south-west of Western Australia from Kalbarri National Park to Cape Arid on the south coast Photo: Babs & Bert Wells/DEC and extending to western parts of the Wheat belt. Size The Tammar Wallaby is currently known to inhabit three islands in the Houtman Abrolhos group (East and West Wallabi Island, and an introduced population on North Island), Garden Island near Perth, Kangaroo Island wallabies Middle and North Twin Peak Islands in the Archipelago of the Head and body length Recherche, and several sites on the mainland - including, Dryandra, Boyagin, Tutanning, Batalling (reintroduced), Perup, private property 590-680 mm in males near Pingelly, Jaloran Road timber reserve near Wagin, Hopetoun, 520-630 mm in females Stirling Range National Park, and Fitzgerald River National Park. The Tammar Wallaby remains relatively abundant at these sites which Tail length are subject to fox control. 380-450 mm in males They have been reintroduced to the Darling scarp near Dwellingup, 330-440 mm in females Julimar Forest near Bindoon, state forest east of Manjimup, Avon Valley National Park, Walyunga National Park, Nambung National Park and to Karakamia and Paruna Sanctuaries. Weight For further information regarding the distribution of this species Western Australian wallabies please refer to www.naturemap.dec.wa.gov.au 2.9-6.1 kg in males Habitat 2.3-4.3 kg in females Dense, low vegetation for daytime shelter and open grassy areas for feeding.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of the Koala, Phascolarctos Cinereus
    I give eonsent to this eopy of ny thesis, r,,rhen d.eposited. in the Universit.y Library, being avail-abl-e 1'or loan and. photocopying. Date . ?! ÛP,"+ .13:r.o.. S igned. CONTENTS SUM MA RY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS lil INTRODUCTION I PA,RT I FIELD STUDIES INTRODUCTION O.l Kongoroo lslqnd B O.2 Floro ond Founo il 0.3 Philpott's Study l3 O.4 Methods t5 0.5 Results 25 I THE DISTRIBUTION AND ABUN DANCE OF KOALAS I. I The Distribution of Koalos 29 | .2 The Abundonce of Koo lqs 34 2 BREEDING, GROWTH AND DEVELOPA,\E¡.¡T 2.1 Breeding 39 2.2 Pouch Young 40 2.3 Growth, Ageing ond LongevitY 49 2.4 Sexucrl Moturity 54 I SUMMARY The distribution of koalas u'ithin Flinders Chase was fou-nd to be made up of areas centred on the occurrences of manna guilr , Euca.ly¡rtus viminalis. Some koalas br:owsed chiefly iri trees of other species but tlrere liÌere ferv animals, if any, that clid not feed on the foliage of E. r'iminalis rnore or less regularly. The composition of populations in sever¿rl sürcly areas changed from üirne to time but over aE long as three successir¡e years of observat:lorr the numhers remained ::emarkably constant. The koalas bred in the surnmer: arrd early auturnn, and a high proporüon of feinales successfully raised a single young to independence each year. Growth of the yourìg was :lapid over the first Lhree yearr!; it slowed. down thereafter and anirnals reached firll size in tlieir fourth and fiffh years.
    [Show full text]
  • New Operational Taxonomic Units of Enterocytozoon in Three Marsupial Species Yan Zhang1, Anson V
    Zhang et al. Parasites & Vectors (2018) 11:371 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2954-x RESEARCH Open Access New operational taxonomic units of Enterocytozoon in three marsupial species Yan Zhang1, Anson V. Koehler1* , Tao Wang1, Shane R. Haydon2 and Robin B. Gasser1* Abstract Background: Enterocytozoon bieneusi is a microsporidian, commonly found in animals, including humans, in various countries. However, there is scant information about this microorganism in Australasia. In the present study, we conducted the first molecular epidemiological investigation of E. bieneusi in three species of marsupials (Macropus giganteus, Vombatus ursinus and Wallabia bicolor) living in the catchment regions which supply the city of Melbourne with drinking water. Methods: Genomic DNAs were extracted from 1365 individual faecal deposits from these marsupials, including common wombat (n = 315), eastern grey kangaroo (n = 647) and swamp wallaby (n = 403) from 11 catchment areas, and then individually tested using a nested PCR-based sequencing approach employing the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and small subunit (SSU) of nuclear ribosomal DNA as genetic markers. Results: Enterocytozoon bieneusi was detected in 19 of the 1365 faecal samples (1.39%) from wombat (n =1), kangaroos (n = 13) and wallabies (n =5).TheanalysisofITS sequence data revealed a known (designated NCF2) and four new (MWC_m1 to MWC_m4) genotypes of E. bieneusi. Phylogenetic analysis of ITS sequence data sets showed that MWC_m1 (from wombat) clustered with NCF2, whereas genotypes MWC_m2 (kangaroo and wallaby), MWC_m3 (wallaby) and MWC_m4 (kangaroo) formed a new, divergent clade. Phylogenetic analysis of SSU sequence data revealed that genotypes MWC_m3 and MWC_m4 formed a clade that was distinct from E.
    [Show full text]
  • Energetics and Biomechanics of Locomotion by Red Kangaroos (Macropus Rufus)
    Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B 120 (1998) 41–49 Review Energetics and biomechanics of locomotion by red kangaroos (Macropus rufus) Rodger Kram a,*, Terence J. Dawson b a Department of Integrati6e Biology, Uni6ersity of California, Berkeley CA 94720-3140, USA b School of Biological Sciences, Uni6ersity of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia Received 15 May 1997; received in revised form 22 September 1997; accepted 7 October 1997 Abstract As red kangaroos hop faster over level ground, their rate of oxygen consumption (indicating metabolic energy consumption) remains nearly the same. This phenomenon has been attributed to exceptional elastic energy storage and recovery via long compliant tendons in the legs. Alternatively, red kangaroos may have exceptionally efficient muscles. To estimate efficiency, we measured the metabolic cost of uphill hopping, where muscle fibers must perform mechanical work against gravity. We found that −1 uphill hopping was much more expensive than level hopping. The maximal rate of oxygen consumption measured (3 ml O2 kg s−1) exceeds all but a few vertebrate species. However, efficiency values were normal, 30%. At faster level hopping speeds the effective mechanical advantage of the extensor muscles of the ankle joint remained the same. Thus, kangaroos generate the same muscular force at all speeds but do so more rapidly at faster hopping speeds. This contradicts a recent hypothesis for what sets the cost of locomotion. The cost of transport (J kg−1 m−1) decreases at faster hopping speeds, yet red kangaroos prefer to use relatively slow speeds that avoid high levels of tendon stress. © 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Platypus Collins, L.R
    AUSTRALIAN MAMMALS BIOLOGY AND CAPTIVE MANAGEMENT Stephen Jackson © CSIRO 2003 All rights reserved. Except under the conditions described in the Australian Copyright Act 1968 and subsequent amendments, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, duplicating or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Contact CSIRO PUBLISHING for all permission requests. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Jackson, Stephen M. Australian mammals: Biology and captive management Bibliography. ISBN 0 643 06635 7. 1. Mammals – Australia. 2. Captive mammals. I. Title. 599.0994 Available from CSIRO PUBLISHING 150 Oxford Street (PO Box 1139) Collingwood VIC 3066 Australia Telephone: +61 3 9662 7666 Local call: 1300 788 000 (Australia only) Fax: +61 3 9662 7555 Email: [email protected] Web site: www.publish.csiro.au Cover photos courtesy Stephen Jackson, Esther Beaton and Nick Alexander Set in Minion and Optima Cover and text design by James Kelly Typeset by Desktop Concepts Pty Ltd Printed in Australia by Ligare REFERENCES reserved. Chapter 1 – Platypus Collins, L.R. (1973) Monotremes and Marsupials: A Reference for Zoological Institutions. Smithsonian Institution Press, rights Austin, M.A. (1997) A Practical Guide to the Successful Washington. All Handrearing of Tasmanian Marsupials. Regal Publications, Collins, G.H., Whittington, R.J. & Canfield, P.J. (1986) Melbourne. Theileria ornithorhynchi Mackerras, 1959 in the platypus, 2003. Beaven, M. (1997) Hand rearing of a juvenile platypus. Ornithorhynchus anatinus (Shaw). Journal of Wildlife Proceedings of the ASZK/ARAZPA Conference. 16–20 March.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Release Monitoring of Western Grey Kangaroos (Macropus Fuliginosus) Relocated from an Urban Development Site
    animals Article Post-Release Monitoring of Western Grey Kangaroos (Macropus fuliginosus) Relocated from an Urban Development Site Mark Cowan 1,* , Mark Blythman 1, John Angus 1 and Lesley Gibson 2 1 Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Wildlife Research Centre, Woodvale, WA 6026, Australia; [email protected] (M.B.); [email protected] (J.A.) 2 Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kensington, WA 6151, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-8-9405-5141 Received: 31 August 2020; Accepted: 5 October 2020; Published: 19 October 2020 Simple Summary: As a result of urban development, 122 western grey kangaroos (Macropus fuliginosus) were relocated from the outskirts of Perth, Western Australia, to a nearby forest. Tracking collars were fitted to 67 of the kangaroos to monitor survival rates and movement patterns over 12 months. Spotlighting and camera traps were used as a secondary monitoring technique particularly for those kangaroos without collars. The survival rate of kangaroos was poor, with an estimated 80% dying within the first month following relocation and only six collared kangaroos surviving for up to 12 months. This result implicates stress associated with the capture, handling, and transport of animals as the likely cause. The unexpected rapid rate of mortality emphasises the importance of minimising stress when undertaking animal relocations. Abstract: The expansion of urban areas and associated clearing of habitat can have severe consequences for native wildlife. One option for managing wildlife in these situations is to relocate them.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogeny and Timescale for Marsupial Evolution Based on Sequences for Five Nuclear Genes
    J Mammal Evol DOI 10.1007/s10914-007-9062-6 ORIGINAL PAPER A Phylogeny and Timescale for Marsupial Evolution Based on Sequences for Five Nuclear Genes Robert W. Meredith & Michael Westerman & Judd A. Case & Mark S. Springer # Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2007 Abstract Even though marsupials are taxonomically less diverse than placentals, they exhibit comparable morphological and ecological diversity. However, much of their fossil record is thought to be missing, particularly for the Australasian groups. The more than 330 living species of marsupials are grouped into three American (Didelphimorphia, Microbiotheria, and Paucituberculata) and four Australasian (Dasyuromorphia, Diprotodontia, Notoryctemorphia, and Peramelemorphia) orders. Interordinal relationships have been investigated using a wide range of methods that have often yielded contradictory results. Much of the controversy has focused on the placement of Dromiciops gliroides (Microbiotheria). Studies either support a sister-taxon relationship to a monophyletic Australasian clade or a nested position within the Australasian radiation. Familial relationships within the Diprotodontia have also proved difficult to resolve. Here, we examine higher-level marsupial relationships using a nuclear multigene molecular data set representing all living orders. Protein-coding portions of ApoB, BRCA1, IRBP, Rag1, and vWF were analyzed using maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian methods. Two different Bayesian relaxed molecular clock methods were employed to construct a timescale for marsupial evolution and estimate the unrepresented basal branch length (UBBL). Maximum likelihood and Bayesian results suggest that the root of the marsupial tree is between Didelphimorphia and all other marsupials. All methods provide strong support for the monophyly of Australidelphia. Within Australidelphia, Dromiciops is the sister-taxon to a monophyletic Australasian clade.
    [Show full text]
  • Biparental Care and Obligate Monogamy in the Rock-Haunting Possum, Petropseudes Dahli, from Tropical Australia
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2000, 59, 1001–1008 doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1392, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Biparental care and obligate monogamy in the rock-haunting possum, Petropseudes dahli, from tropical Australia MYFANWY J. RUNCIE CRC for Sustainable Development of Tropical Savannas, Northern Territory University (Received 10 May 1999; initial acceptance 9 June 1999; final acceptance 30 December 1999; MS. number: 6222R) Monogamy is rare among mammals, including marsupials. I studied the social organization of the little-known rock-haunting possum in Kakadu National Park in Northern Australia. Preliminary field observations revealed that the majority of possums live in cohesive groups consisting of a female–male pair and young, suggesting a monogamous mating system. I used radiotracking to determine home range patterns, and observations to measure the degree of symmetry between the sexes in maintaining the pair bond and initiating changes in group activity. I also measured the extent of maternal and paternal indirect and direct care. Nocturnal observations and radiotelemetric data from 3 years showed that six possum groups maintained nonoverlapping home ranges with long-term consorts and young sharing dens. Males contributed more than females to maintaining the pair bond but they contributed equally to parental care. For the first time, the parental behaviours of bridge formation, embracing, marshalling of young, sentinel behaviour and tail beating are reported in a marsupial. Males participated to a high degree in maintaining relationships with one mate and their offspring. Collectively, these results suggest that the mating system of this wild population of rock-haunting possums is obligate social monogamy.
    [Show full text]
  • Dipodomys Ingens)
    Species Status Assessment Report for the Giant Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys ingens) Photo by Elizabeth Bainbridge Version 1.0 August 2020 Prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service August 2020 GKR SSA Report – August 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service listed the giant kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ingens) as endangered under the Endangered Species Act in 1987 due to the threats of habitat loss and widespread rodenticide use (Service 1987, entire). The giant kangaroo rat is the largest species in the genus that contains all kangaroo rats. The giant kangaroo rat is found only in south-central California, on the western slopes of the San Joaquin Valley, the Carrizo and Elkhorn Plains, and the Cuyama Valley. The preferred habitat of the giant kangaroo rat is native, sloping annual grasslands with sparse vegetation (Grinnell, 1932; Williams, 1980). This report summarizes the results of a species status assessment (SSA) that the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) completed for the giant kangaroo rat. To assess the species’ viability, we used the three conservation biology principles of resiliency, redundancy, and representation (together, the 3Rs). These principles rely on assessing the species at an individual, population, and species level to determine whether the species can persist into the future and avoid extinction by having multiple resilient populations distributed widely across its range. Giant kangaroo rats remain in fragmented habitat patches throughout their historical range. However, some areas where giant kangaroo rats once existed have not had documented occurrences for 30 years or more. The giant kangaroo rat is found in six geographic areas (units), representing the northern, middle, and southern portions of the range.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductionreview
    REPRODUCTIONREVIEW Wombat reproduction (Marsupialia; Vombatidae): an update and future directions for the development of artificial breeding technology Lindsay A Hogan1, Tina Janssen2 and Stephen D Johnston1,2 1Wildlife Biology Unit, Faculty of Science, School of Agricultural and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton 4343, Queensland, Australia and 2Australian Animals Care and Education, Mt Larcom 4695, Queensland, Australia Correspondence should be addressed to L A Hogan; Email: [email protected] Abstract This review provides an update on what is currently known about wombat reproductive biology and reports on attempts made to manipulate and/or enhance wombat reproduction as part of the development of artificial reproductive technology (ART) in this taxon. Over the last decade, the logistical difficulties associated with monitoring a nocturnal and semi-fossorial species have largely been overcome, enabling new features of wombat physiology and behaviour to be elucidated. Despite this progress, captive propagation rates are still poor and there are areas of wombat reproductive biology that still require attention, e.g. further characterisation of the oestrous cycle and oestrus. Numerous advances in the use of ART have also been recently developed in the Vombatidae but despite this research, practical methods of manipulating wombat reproduction for the purposes of obtaining research material or for artificial breeding are not yet available. Improvement of the propagation, genetic diversity and management of wombat populations requires a thorough understanding of Vombatidae reproduction. While semen collection and cryopreservation in wombats is fairly straightforward there is currently an inability to detect, induce or synchronise oestrus/ovulation and this is an impeding progress in the development of artificial insemination in this taxon.
    [Show full text]
  • Exotic to Australia
    Fact sheet Introductory statement Foot and mouth disease (FMD) is a highly contagious viral vesicular disease of cloven hoofed animals. It is a major issue in international trade in livestock and livestock products. Australia is free of the disease and it is vital that it remains so. The 2001 outbreak in the United Kingdom resulted in over 10 million cattle and sheep being slaughtered at a cost of over GBP 8 billion in order to eradicate the disease. This fact sheet summarises what is known about FMD and Australian native wildlife. WHA also manages an fact sheet that briefly summarises information on FMD and feral animals “Foot and Mouth Disease (General Information)”. Aetiology and natural hosts FMD is caused by an aphthovirus belonging to the family Picornaviridae. It is a single stranded non enveloped 25 nm RNA virus. There are seven serotypes: A, O, C, SAT 1, SAT 2, SAT 3, and Asia 1. All cloven hoofed animals are considered susceptible. Cases have also been reported in elephants, hedgehogs and some rodents. World distribution and occurrences in Australia FMD is endemic in Africa, the Middle East, Asia and parts of South America. The disease has almost been eradicated from Europe with the most recent cases occurring in the United Kingdom and Cyprus in 2007. FMD has not occurred in Australia for over 130 years, and then only in livestock. Minor outbreaks occurred in 1801, 1804, 1871 and 1872 (Geering et al 1995). However, a case was reported in an eastern grey kangaroo (Macropus giganteus) held in a zoo in India (Bhattacharya et al 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Eucalypt Plant Monoterpenes on Koala
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Efects of Eucalypt Plant Monoterpenes on Koala (Phascolarctos Cinereus) Cytokine Expression In Vitro Caroline Marschner*, Mark B. Krockenberger & Damien P. Higgins Protective immunity is crucial for survival of any species, though the koala as a specialist feeder adapted to an exclusive diet of eucalypts that contain plant secondary metabolites of varying toxicity and of immunomodulatory property. Being constantly exposed to such dietary chemicals it raises the question of their immune efects in a specialist eucalypt feeder. This study demonstrates that natural levels of circulating eucalypt plant secondary metabolites have dose dependent in vitro efects on cytokine expression of koala peripheral blood mononuclear cells, suggesting a potential trade-of of reduced function in multiple arms of the immune system associated with koala’s use of its specialized dietary niche. Widespread in the Australian landscape, eucalypts comprise an easily accessible food resource for some foli- vores, such as the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus), the ringtail possum (Pseudocheirus peregrinus) and greater glider (Petauroides volans) that are able to exploit this dietary niche. Te koala is able to utilise this resource exclusively for nutrition and shelter1 even though chemical defences render eucalypt leaves unpalatable, of low nutritional value, and even toxic. Tannin and lignin (up to 30% DM) bind valuable leaf proteins2,3 and cell wall carbohy- drates4 in the gastrointestinal tract of herbivores. Most leaf fats are either indigestible waxes2 or toxic terpenoids. Monoterpenes, an abundant group of terpenoids in eucalypts, are of small molecular weight and highly lipo- philic, hence are readily absorbable from the gut wall of eucalypt folivores5, and enter the circulation5–10.
    [Show full text]