DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 218/Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 218/Tuesday, November 12, 2019 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2019 / Notices 61011 (10) calendar days following publication within 30 days of publication of this circumstances review). For any of this notice. These petitions are notice in the Federal Register. All company subject to this review, if received pursuant to section 251 of the submissions must be filed electronically Commerce determined, or continued to Trade Act of 1974, as amended. at http://access.trade.gov in accordance treat, that company as collapsed with Please follow the requirements set with 19 CFR 351.303.1 Such others, Commerce will assume that such forth in EDA’s regulations at 13 CFR submissions are subject to verification companies continue to operate in the 315.9 for procedures to request a public in accordance with section 782(i) of the same manner and will collapse them for hearing. The Catalog of Federal Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). respondent selection purposes. Domestic Assistance official number Further, in accordance with 19 CFR Otherwise, Commerce will not collapse and title for the program under which 351.303(f)(1)(i), a copy must be served companies for purposes of respondent these petitions are submitted is 11.313, on every party on Commerce’s service selection. Parties are requested to (a) Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms. list. identify which companies subject to review previously were collapsed, and Irette Patterson, Respondent Selection (b) provide a citation to the proceeding Program Analyst. In the event Commerce limits the in which they were collapsed. Further, [FR Doc. 2019–24488 Filed 11–8–19; 8:45 am] number of respondents for individual if companies are requested to complete BILLING CODE 3510–WH–P examination for administrative reviews the Quantity and Value (Q&V) initiated pursuant to requests made for Questionnaire for purposes of the orders identified below, Commerce respondent selection, in general, each DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE intends to select respondents based on company must report volume and value U.S. Customs and Border Protection data separately for itself. Parties should International Trade Administration (CBP) data for U.S. imports during the not include data for any other party, Initiation of Antidumping and POR. We intend to place the CBP data even if they believe they should be Countervailing Duty Administrative on the record within five days of treated as a single entity with that other Reviews publication of the initiation notice and party. If a company was collapsed with to make our decision regarding another company or companies in the AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, respondent selection within 30 days of most recently completed segment of this International Trade Administration, publication of the initiation Federal proceeding where Commerce Department of Commerce. Register notice. Comments regarding the considered collapsing that entity, SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce CBP data and respondent selection complete Q&V data for that collapsed (Commerce) has received requests to should be submitted within seven days entity must be submitted. conduct administrative reviews of after the placement of the CBP data on Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for various antidumping (AD) and the record of this review. Parties Administrative Review countervailing duty (CVD) orders and wishing to submit rebuttal comments findings with September anniversary should submit those comments within Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a dates. In accordance with Commerce’s five days after the deadline for the party that has requested a review may regulations, we are initiating those initial comments. withdraw that request within 90 days of administrative reviews. In the event Commerce decides it is the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The DATES: Applicable November 12, 2019. necessary to limit individual regulation provides that Commerce may FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection under extend this time if it is reasonable to do Brenda E. Brown, AD/CVD Operations, so. Determinations by Commerce to Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and section 777A(c)(2) of the Act, the following guidelines regarding extend the 90-day deadline will be Compliance, International Trade made on a case-by-case basis. Administration, U.S. Department of collapsing of companies for purposes of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue respondent selection will apply. In Deadline for Particular Market NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: general, Commerce has found that Situation Allegation determinations concerning whether (202) 482–4735. Section 504 of the Trade Preferences particular companies should be SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Extension Act of 2015 amended the Act ‘‘collapsed’’ (e.g., treated as a single by adding the concept of a particular Background entity for purposes of calculating market situation (PMS) for purposes of antidumping duty rates) require a Commerce has received timely constructed value under section 773(e) substantial amount of detailed requests, in accordance with 19 CFR of the Act.2 information and analysis, which often Section 773(e) of the Act 351.213(b), for administrative reviews of states that ‘‘if a particular market various AD and CVD orders and require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, Commerce will situation exists such that the cost of findings with September anniversary materials and fabrication or other dates. not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent selection phase of this processing of any kind does not All deadlines for the submission of accurately reflect the cost of production various types of information, review and will not collapse companies at the respondent selection phase unless in the ordinary course of trade, the certifications, or comments or actions by administering authority may use Commerce discussed below refer to the there has been a determination to collapse certain companies in a another calculation methodology under number of calendar days from the this subtitle or any other calculation applicable starting time. previous segment of this AD proceeding (e.g., investigation, administrative methodology.’’ When an interested Notice of No Sales review, new shipper review, or changed party submits a PMS allegation pursuant to section 773(e) of the Act, Commerce If a producer or exporter named in 1 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty will respond to such a submission this notice of initiation had no exports, Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; sales, or entries during the period of Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 2 See Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, review (POR), it must notify Commerce 39263 (July 6, 2011). Public Law 114–27, 129 Stat. 362 (2015). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:47 Nov 08, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM 12NON1 61012 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2019 / Notices consistent with 19 CFR 351.301(c)(2)(v). if respondents can demonstrate the proceeding that have subsequently If Commerce finds that a PMS exists absence of both de jure and de facto made changes, including, but not under section 773(e) of the Act, then it government control over export limited to, changes to corporate will modify its dumping calculations activities. structure, acquisitions of new appropriately. All firms listed below that wish to companies or facilities, or changes to Neither section 773(e) of the Act nor qualify for separate rate status in the their official company name,4 should 19 CFR 351.301(c)(2)(v) set a deadline administrative reviews involving NME timely file a Separate Rate Application for the submission of PMS allegations countries must complete, as to demonstrate eligibility for a separate and supporting factual information. appropriate, either a separate rate rate in this proceeding. The Separate However, in order to administer section application or certification, as described Rate Application will be available on 773(e) of the Act, Commerce must below. For these administrative reviews, Commerce’s website at http:// receive PMS allegations and supporting in order to demonstrate separate rate enforcement.trade.gov/nme/nme-sep- factual information with enough time to eligibility, Commerce requires entities rate.html on the date of publication of consider the submission. Thus, should for whom a review was requested, that this Federal Register notice. In an interested party wish to submit a were assigned a separate rate in the responding to the Separate Rate PMS allegation and supporting new most recent segment of this proceeding Application, refer to the instructions factual information pursuant to section in which they participated, to certify contained in the application. Separate 773(e) of the Act, it must do so no later that they continue to meet the criteria Rate Applications are due to Commerce than 20 days after submission of initial for obtaining a separate rate. The no later than 30 calendar days after responses to section D of the Separate Rate Certification form will be publication of this Federal Register questionnaire. available on Commerce’s website at notice. The deadline and requirement Separate Rates http://enforcement.trade.gov/nme/nme- for submitting a Separate Rate Application applies equally to NME- In proceedings involving non-market sep-rate.html on the date of publication owned firms, wholly foreign-owned economy (NME) countries, Commerce of this
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped
    2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Index weight Index weight Index weight Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country (%) (%) (%) Alteogen 0.19 KOREA Hyundai Engineering & Construction 0.35 KOREA NH Investment & Securities 0.14 KOREA AmoreG 0.15 KOREA Hyundai Glovis 0.32 KOREA NHN 0.07 KOREA Amorepacific Corp 0.65 KOREA Hyundai Heavy Industries 0.29 KOREA Nong Shim 0.08 KOREA Amorepacific Pfd. 0.08 KOREA Hyundai Marine & Fire Insurance 0.13 KOREA OCI 0.17 KOREA BGF Retail 0.09 KOREA Hyundai Merchant Marine 1.02 KOREA Orion 0.21 KOREA BNK Financial Group 0.18 KOREA Hyundai Mipo Dockyard 0.15 KOREA Ottogi 0.06 KOREA Celltrion Healthcare 0.68 KOREA Hyundai Mobis 1.53 KOREA Paradise 0.07 KOREA Celltrion Inc 2.29 KOREA Hyundai Motor 2.74 KOREA Posco 1.85 KOREA Celltrion Pharm 0.24 KOREA Hyundai Motor 2nd Pfd. 0.33 KOREA Posco Chemical 0.32 KOREA Cheil Worldwide 0.14 KOREA Hyundai Motor Pfd. 0.21 KOREA Posco International 0.09 KOREA CJ Cheiljedang 0.3 KOREA Hyundai Steel 0.33 KOREA S1 Corporation 0.13 KOREA CJ CheilJedang Pfd. 0.02 KOREA Hyundai Wia 0.13 KOREA Samsung Biologics 0.92 KOREA CJ Corp 0.11 KOREA Industrial Bank of Korea 0.22 KOREA Samsung C&T 0.94 KOREA CJ ENM 0.15 KOREA Kakao 3.65 KOREA Samsung Card 0.08 KOREA CJ Logistics 0.12 KOREA Kangwon Land 0.23 KOREA Samsung Electro-Mechanics 0.81 KOREA Coway 0.36 KOREA KB Financial Group 1.78 KOREA Samsung Electronics 25.36 KOREA Daewoo Engineering & Construction 0.12 KOREA KCC Corp 0.12 KOREA Samsung Electronics Pfd.
    [Show full text]
  • ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Case No. KR-2000221
    (Seoul Office) ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Case No. KR-2000221 Complainants1: Hyundai Motor Company Complainants2: Hyundai Heavy Industries Holdings Co., Ltd. (Authorized Representative for Complainants 1,2 : Patent Attorney Sung-Pil HWANG (E.M. HWANG & PARTNERS)) Respondent: Imad Boukai (Authorized Representative for Respondent : Changhoon Lee (AJU Kim Chang & Lee)) Disputed Domain Name(s): hyundaitechnology.com 1. The Parties and Contested Domain Name The Complainants are Hyundai Motor Company of 12, Heolleung-ro, Seocho-gu, Seoul (Yangjae-dong), Republic of Korea and Hyundai Heavy Industries Holdings Co., Ltd. of 75, Yulgok-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul(Gye-dong), Republic of Korea. The Authorized Representative of Complainants is Sung-Pil Hwang, E.M. HWANG & PARTNERS, Mansung Building, 9-8, Gaepo-ro 31-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul. The Respondent is Imad Boukai, General Procurement, Inc. (“GPI”), 800 East Dyer, Santa Ana, California, US. Page 1 The Authorized Representative of the Respondent is Changhoon Lee, AJU Kim Chang & Lee, 7-14th Floor, Donghee Building, 302 Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul 06253, Republic of Korea. The domain name at issue is ‘hyundaitechnology.com’(the “disputed domain name”), registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC. 2. Procedural History The Complainants was filed with the Seoul Office of the Asian Domain Name Dispute Resolution Center (ADNDRC, the “Center”) on September 14, 2020, seeking for a cancellation of the disputed domain name. On September 25, 2020, the Center sent an email to the Registrar asking for the detailed data of the registrant. On September 26, 2020, GoDaddy.com, LLC transmitted by email to the Center its verification response, advising that the Respondent is listed as the registrant and providing the contact details.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyundai Steel (004020 KS /Buy )
    Hyundai Steel (004020 KS /Buy ) Stake sale likely to lead to lower interest expenses Steel and higher dividend payout Issue Comment Following the merger between Hyundai Glovis and Hyundai Mobis’s spun-off businesses, March 29, 2018 Hyundai Steel is expected to sell its stake in Hyundai Mobis for roughly W1.13tr. Cash proceeds are estimated at W820bn (factoring in capital gains taxes). If the proceeds from the sale are used to repay debt, annual interest expenses would Mirae Asset Daewoo Co., Ltd. decrease and dividend payouts would likely expand. [ Metals & Mining ] Jaekwang Rhee Planning to sell Hyundai Mobis stake following merger +822 -3774 -6022 th [email protected] On March 28 , Hyundai Steel disclosed that it would sell its stake in Hyundai Mobis (012330 KS/Buy/TP: W300,000/CP: W261,000) to Hyundai Motor Group (HMG) chairman Chung Mong-koo and vice chairman Chung Eui-sun, once the merger between Hyundai Glovis (086280 KS/Buy/TP: W210,000/CP: W173,500) and Hyundai Mobis’s spun-off businesses is completed. Meanwhile, the firm will retain its stake in Hyundai Glovis. th Based on the March 28 closing price of Hyundai Mobis, we estimate the value of Hyundai Steel’s stake at W1.13tr, and actual cash proceeds from the sale (factoring in capital gains taxes) at W820bn. The actual sale price will be confirmed within two months of Hyundai Mobis’s listing change (slated for July 30 th ). Stake sale to lead to lower interest expenses and higher dividends Assuming that the spin-off and merger progress smoothly, Hyundai Steel is likely to use the proceeds from the sale of its stake in Hyundai Mobis for debt repayment.
    [Show full text]
  • Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/29/2021 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2021-16172, and onBILLINGgovinfo.gov CODE: 3510-DS-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-881] Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain cold-rolled steel flat products (cold-rolled steel) from the Republic of Korea were not sold in the United States at prices below normal value during the period of review (POR), September 1, 2018, through August 31, 2019. DATES: Applicable [INSERT DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Heaney, George McMahon, or Marc Castillo, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4475, (202) 482-1167, or (202) 482-5019, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On January 25, 2021, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review.1 We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. Between February 24, and March 5, 2021, Commerce received timely filed case briefs and rebuttal briefs from United States Steel Corporation (U.S. Steel), additional domestic parties,2 Hyundai Steel 1 See Certain Cold Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019, 86 FR 6871 (January 25, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
    [Show full text]
  • EMGT 835 Field Project: Global Shipbuilding, Who Will Be the Leader? South Korea Or China?
    EMGT 835 Field Project: Global Shipbuilding, Who will be the leader? South Korea or China? By Yong Jin Dan Master of Science University of Kansas Fall Semester, 2007 An EMGT Field Project report submitted to the Engineering Management Program and the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. Chick Keller, Committee Chair Herb Tuttle, Committee Member Annette Tetmeyer, Committee Member 1 Executive Summary Shipbuilding is an industry that most developing countries strategically choose as a long term development plan. South Korea has also developed the shipbuilding industry as a part of governmental plan. Since 2000, South Korea has kept the leading position in the industry and seems to be dominant until in the middle of the 2010’s. South Korea’s biggest strength is design capability and technological superiority which should enable them to promptly reflect customer needs. In addition, a relatively abundant workforce, openness to innovation, strong R&D investment and the development of the related industries will also play key roles to remaining competitive in the industry. Meanwhile, China has become the second largest shipbuilder in the industry since 2006. A China’s soaring economic growth has been a big push for the shipbuilding and related industries as well. As of January 2007, China has 51% of orders place worldwide, which includes an 81% share of the low end vessel market. China is now threatening not only South Korea but also all shipbuilding countries with its price competitiveness, aggressive capacity expansion and technological cooperation with western countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes and Continued Growth of Foreign Investment
    The Top 20 Korean Multinationals: Changes and Continued Growth of Foreign Investment Seoul and New York, March 5, 2015 Graduate School of International Studies at Seoul National University in Seoul, and the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI), a joint center of the Columbia Law School and the Earth Institute at Columbia University in New York, are releasing the results of their survey of Korean multinationals today. The survey, conducted during 2014, is part of a long-term study of the rapid global expansion of multinational enterprises (MNEs) from emerging markets.1 The research for this report was conducted in 2014 and covers the period from 2011 to 2013.2 Highlights In 2013, the top 20 Korean multinationals, ranked by their foreign assets (See Table 1), jointly held US$68.9 billion assets abroad.3 Most firms were subsidiaries of Korea’s eight leading business groups (or chaebols), including Samsung, POSCO, LG, Hyundai Heavy Industries, Hyundai-Kia Motors, SK, Lotte, and Hyosung Group. Five out of the 20 multinationals were also included in UNCTAD’s “Top 100 non-financial TNCs from developing and transition economies” in 2012.4 The average age of the top 20 firms is about 47 years, which is two times the average age of Korea’s top 1,000 firms (ranked in terms of total assets). There is a high concentration by the top players in the list in terms of foreign assets. Among the top 20 companies, Samsung Electronics, POSCO, and Hyundai Motor Company ranked in the top three in that order. There was a significant difference between first and second place, with the foreign assets of Samsung Electronics more than doubling that of POSCO.
    [Show full text]
  • JKD/JAD April 14, 2020 MEMORANDUM TO
    A-580-867 POR: 08/01/2017-07/31/2018 Public Document E&C/OVI: JKD/JAD April 14, 2020 MEMORANDUM TO: Jeffrey I. Kessler Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance FROM: James Maeder Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations SUBJECT: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea; 2017-2018 I. SUMMARY We have analyzed the case and rebuttal briefs submitted by interested parties. As a result of our analysis, we continue to find that the application of total adverse facts available (AFA) is appropriate for Hyundai Electric & Energy Systems Co., Ltd. (Hyundai), as discussed below. For Hyosung Corporation and Hyosung Heavy Industries Corporation (collectively, Hyosung), we have made changes from the Preliminary Results,1 as discussed below. We recommend that you approve the positions described in the “Discussion of the Issues” section of this Issues and Decision Memorandum. The complete list of the issues in this administrative review for which we received comments from parties is provided below: Hyundai-Specific Issues Comment 1: Application of AFA A) Hyundai’s Completeness Failure at Verification B) Hyundai’s Reporting of Sales Documentation C) Hyundai’s Understatement of its Home Market Gross Unit Prices D) Application of Total AFA Comment 2: Selection of AFA Rate 1 See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017–2018, 84 FR 55559 (October 17, 2019) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM); see also Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Correction to the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017–2018, 84 FR 65350 (November 27, 2019) (Amended Preliminary Results).
    [Show full text]
  • Hyundai Steel (004020 KS ) Share Prices Reflect Worst -Ever Earnings
    Hyundai Steel (004020 KS ) Share prices reflect worst -ever earnings Steel Operating loss to persist through 1H20 due to COVID-19 Company Report For 1Q20, we expect Hyundai Steel to post a smaller operating loss QoQ due to a April 16, 2020 favorable comparison (W50bn in one-off expenses were recorded in 4Q19) and better long steel margins. That said, we forecast 1Q20 earnings to be weaker than originally anticipated, as our forecast at the beginning of the year was based on an expectation of price hikes for non-automotive steel products. Considering lead times, we anticipate the full impact of COVID-19 to be felt from 2Q20, as flat steel prices will likely fall more (Maintain) Buy steeply than raw material prices, crippling margins. Overseas plant shutdowns by Hyundai Motor (HMC; 005380 KS/Buy/TP: W178,000/CP: W100,000) and Kia Motors Target Price (12M, W) ▼ 28,000 (000270 KS/Trading Buy/TP: W53,000/CP: W29,850) should lead to a decline in sales volume and higher fixed costs, further hurting earnings. For long steel, product prices Share Price (04/14/20, W) 19,750 have risen, while raw material prices have fallen. We expect margins to continue to improve in 2Q20, but largely because of production cuts by major domestic Expected Return 42% steelmakers. While mill margins are likely to improve, we believe the impact will be partially offset by an increase in fixed costs resulting from lower production. OP (20F, Wbn) 69 Earnings to pick up gradually from 3Q20; Timing of HMC/Kia ’s production Consensus OP (20F, Wbn) 384 restart will be key We expect earnings to begin to pick up in 3Q20, as lockdowns outside China should EPS Growth (20F, %) - ease.
    [Show full text]
  • April 9, 2015
    April 9, 2015 KOREA Sector News & Analysis Major Indices Close Chg Chg (%) Steel (Overweight) KOSPI 2,058.87 -0.39 -0.02 Hyundai Steel announces merger with Hyundai Hysco KOSPI 200 258.33 -0.18 -0.07 KOSDAQ 676.96 8.93 1.34 Economy & Strategy Update Turnover ('000 shares, Wbn) April MPC Volume Value KOSPI 519,429 5,805 Expectations for a rate cut remain intact KOSPI 200 84,005 3,924 KOSDAQ 579,044 3,700 Market Cap (Wbn) Value KOSPI 1,285,499 KOSDAQ 180,759 KOSPI Turnover (Wbn) Buy Sell Net Foreign 1,421 1,349 72 Institutional 963 1,227 -264 Retail 3,371 3,188 184 KOSDAQ Turnover (Wbn) Buy Sell Net Foreign 235 185 50 Institutional 179 186 -7 Retail 3,275 3,317 -42 Program Buy / Sell (Wbn) Buy Sell Net KOSPI 839 887 -49 KOSDAQ 35 39 -4 Advances & Declines Advances Declines Unchanged KOSPI 455 359 57 KOSDAQ 613 369 58 KOSPI Top 5 Most Active Stocks by Value (Wbn) Price (W) Chg (W) Value Samsung Electronics 1,483,000 4,000 251 Hynix 41,900 -700 234 KODEX LEVERAGE 11,435 -25 155 LG Chem 254,000 12,500 128 NHN 653,000 8,000 115 KOSDAQ Top 5 Most Active Stocks by Value (Wbn) Price (W) Chg (W) Value Daum Communications 110,300 3,200 152 Sansung P&C 91,800 11,900 136 GOLFZON 15,450 2,000 131 Coreana Cosmetics 7,920 380 89 Celltrion 73,500 -1,200 83 Note: As of April 9, 2015 This document is a summary of a report prepared by Daewoo Securities Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Korea Chaebols
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by K-Developedia(KDI School) Repository Emerging Market Spotlight November 2010 The Chaebols in South Korea: Spearheading Economic Growth South Korea has witnessed an incredible transformation in the Fast Facts three decades spanning from the Chaebols are large multinational family-controlled 1960s to 1990s, evolving from an conglomerates in South Korea, which have enjoyed strong impoverished country to a governmental support. developed high-income economy today. Often referred to as the The word Chaebol literally means “business association”. “Miracle of the Han River”, this President Park Chung Hee (1961-1979) widely propagated remarkable turnaround was and publicized the chaebol model of state-corporate achieved through an aggressive, alliance. outward-oriented strategy, focusing on developing large-scale The Chaebols have invested heavily in the export-oriented industrial conglomerates or manufacturing sector. chaebols. Some well-recognized South Korean conglomerates boasting global brand names are Samsung, Hyundai and Today, the chaebols have become LG. multinational powerhouses with a global footprint. And with this, The chaebol model of state-corporate alliance is based on South Korea boasts of an economy the Japanese Zaibatsu system, which encouraged economic that ranks 15th globally in nominal development through large business conglomerates from 1968 until the end of the World War II. terms and 13th in terms of Purchasing Power Parity (PPP). Paradigm shift in the South Korean economy The first half of the 20th century was a tumultuous, war-ravaged period for the country, punctuated by a 35-year Japanese colonization of the country, which ended with Japan’s defeat in World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Sustainable Management and Capital Market: Evidence from Data on Korean Firms
    August 2016;1(1):56-66 http://dx.doi.org/10.20522/APJBR.2016.1.1.56 Corporate Sustainable Management and Capital Market: Evidence from Data on Korean Firms Young Sik Kim School of Management, Kyung Hee University Ki Bum Park* Department of music education, Chuncheon National University of Education Abstract This paper analyzes the impact of CSR on the capital market in Korea. Using listed firm data, we found that the creation of a sustainability report that indirectly measures the level of CSR can bring the stock rate of return difference of the capital markets representative market index. First, when a firm that publishes a sustainability report was compared in terms of its market rate of return, it showed a return increase of about 2%. We found that higher returns were gained through the competitive advantage of related business when the firm was actively involved in social responsibility. Second, subdivided by industry, firms belonging to the capital goods industry were found to reach a rate of return higher than that of industry. These firms were noticeable in that they were mainly industries that caused environmental pollution. Third, in an additional analysis, foreign investors were given the sustainability report of financial businesses, which was interpreted as a result of industrial properties. A sustainability report is a comprehensive report on the economic, environmental, and social activities of a firm. Firms must learn that they can gain trust through publishing trustworthy reports while achieving the lasting power of growth from the stakeholders. Keywords Sustainability report, CSR, Capital market, GRI, Stock return 1) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Hyundai
    History of Hyundai http://santafemods.com/History/History%20of%20Hyundai.htm Abstract Taking pride in your car by driving it and admiring it is one thing, actually knowing its history is quite another. The Hyundai Motor Company is one if not the most dynamic automobile producer in any developing country. This is remarkable considering that the company is closing in on 40 years of existence. To outline its history one must also look into the life and times of its founder Chung Ju-Yung. It cannot be told without the outlining the founders rise from the rice fields of Korea to the circumstances that let him to acquire the knowledge and determination that led to the creation of one of the fastest growing family owned businesses into a global competitor. His creation of numerous companies eventually let to the establishment of the Hyundai Group. The Hyundai Motor Company was one of these. He created it and transformed it from a mere assembler of Ford models to a designer and exporter of its own cars and engines in less than four decades. It has already become a major global player with plants and dealerships that span six continents. The company is one of the largest and most diversified business organizations with 45 affiliated domestic companies and 254 overseas companies in nearly 200 countries. The Hyundai Motor Company is but one which the Group is active in such as shipbuilding, steel, petrochemicals, heavy machinery, aerospace, electronics and financial services. These pages therefore outlines not only the rich and unique History of the Hyundai Motor Company but also the remarkable years beforehand that led to its creation, the eventual breakup of the Group and its continuous development into a top ten global automaker.
    [Show full text]