Download a from Students, Teachers, and Parents
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Long Trails Project USP 549: REGIONAL PLANNING and METROPOLITAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT
The Long Trails Project USP 549: REGIONAL PLANNING and METROPOLITAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT Toulan School of Urban Studies and Planning College of Urban and Public Affairs Portland State University Fall, 2012 Table of Contents I. Introduction and Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................ 2 II. History of Long Trails and Regional Trail Networks ..................................................................................................... 6 III. Long Trails in Northwestern Oregon...............................................................................................................................20 IV. The Demand for Long Trails-based Recreation ...........................................................................................................36 V. Long Trails and Community Economic Development .............................................................................................52 VI. Long Trails Implementation ...............................................................................................................................................76 I. Introduction and Acknowledgements The Oregon Department of Forestry and the Oregon Parks Team 3: The Demand for trails-base recreation; analysis and Department are currently engaged in a joint assessment of a new critique of SCORP and similar surveys; trails in the context of trail extending from Garibaldi, on the Oregon coast, to the crest other recreational opportunities; -
Land Trusts and Water Strategies and Resources for Addressing Water in Western Land Conservation
StrategiesLand and Resources Trusts for Addressing Water and in Western WaterLand Conservation SARAH BATES Contributing Authors Ada Montague • Keif Storrar • Benjamin Sudduth LANDStrategies and Resources TRUS for AddressingTS Water AND in Western WA Land ConservationTER LAND TRUSTS AND WATER Strategies and Resources for Addressing Water in Western Land Conservation Author Sarah Bates Center for Natural Resources and Environmental Policy, University of Montana Contributing Authors Ada Montague Keif Storrar Benjamin Sudduth Land Use Clinic, University of Montana School of Law Reviewers Erin Heskett Leslie Ratley-Beach Land Trust Alliance Executive Editor Sylvia Bates Land Trust Alliance Managing Editor Mary Burke Land Trust Alliance Funding for this book was generously provided by the Walton Family Foundation. LANDStrategies and Resources TRUS for AddressingTS Water AND in Western WA Land ConservationTER Sarah Bates Contributing Authors Ada Montague Keif Storrar Benjamin Sudduth Land Trust Alliance The Land Trust Alliance’s mission is to save the places people love by strength- ening land conservation across America. The Land Trust Alliance represents more than 1,700 land trusts and promotes volun- tary land conservation to benefit communities through clean air and water, fresh local food, natural habitats and places to refresh our minds and bodies. For information: www.landtrustalliance.org. The Center for Natural Resources and Environmental Policy is an applied research and education center based at the University of Montana that informs and invigo- rates public policy through research, education and collaborative problem solving. For information: www.cnrep.org. The Land Use Clinic at the University of Montana School of Law engages third- year law students in projects on behalf of clients that include local governments and nonprofit organizations, providing hands-on experience in the practice of land-use law and policy. -
Community Guide to Hawai'i Land Conservation
Community Guide to Hawaiʻi Land Conservation “He aliʻi ka ʻāina; he kauwā ke kanaka.” “The land is a chief; man is its servant.” Mary Kawena Pukui, ʻŌlelo Noʻeau. According to Hawaiian historian Mary Kawena Pukui, “Land has no need for man, but man needs the land and works it for a livelihood.” Introduction / Preface Community members often ask Hawaiian Islands Land Trust, The Trust for Public Land’s Hawaiʻi Program, and other land trusts how they can work with land trusts to save particular lands of natural and cultural significance. This guide is intended to help those community members, and applies to land that: 1) is privately- owned, 2) has significant natural, cultural, or agricultural resources, and 3) is threatened with uses that would harm the resources, such as subdivision and development. Protecting a threatened special place can seem daunting or even impossible. Knowing who to call, what to research, and how to ask for assistance can be confusing. The Trust for Public Land and Hawaiian Islands Land Trust share this guide to clarify the voluntary land conservation process and empower communities across Hawaiʻi in protecting privately owned and threatened lands with cultural, agricultural, and/or ecolog- ical significance. Voluntary land conservation – buying land for public agencies or community organizations or restricting land uses on private property with the cooperation of the landowner — has resolved heated land disputes and created win-win-win solutions that benefit private landowners, our environment, community, and future gen- erations. Where land use is contentious, the process of collaboratively working toward the land’s protection often begins a healing process that can build community resiliency and connections. -
“The Geography of Land Trusts in the United States”
“THE GEOGRAPHY OF LAND TRUSTS IN THE UNITED STATES” By Rachel Ralls Research Paper Submitted to Dr. Pomeroy Geography-Earth Science Department SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY Shippensburg, Pennsylvania August 1, 2013 Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Land Trusts Defined................................................................................................................................... 3 Land Protection Methods .......................................................................................................................... 6 Funding ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 Staffing ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 Question ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 Data and Methods ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Results and Discussion ............................................................................................................................... -
Change in Ownership for Transfer to a Land Trust
STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION JOHAN KLEHS 450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA First District, Hayward PO BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0082 DEAN ANDAL TELEPHONE (916) 324-2642 Second District, Stockton FAX (916) 323-3387 CLAUDE PARRISH www.boe.ca.gov Third District, Torrance JOHN CHIANG June 26, 2000 Fourth District, Los Angeles KATHLEEN CONNELL State Controller, Sacramento Honorable William G. Copren, Assessor JAMES E. SPEED County of Sierra Executive Director P.O. Box 8 Downieville, CA 95936 RE: Change in Ownership for Transfer to a California Land Trust Dear Mr. Copren: This is in reply to your letter to Senior Tax Counsel Kristine Cazadd dated February 29, 2000 regarding the possible reappraisal of real property transferred to the Land Trust (PRLT) and information regarding a California Land Trust. As discussed further below, it is our opinion that the PRLT is an Illinois land trust and that the transfer of real property to this trust would be excluded from change in ownership. Factual Background As detailed in your letter and the accompanying trust document (1) the sole owner of real property transferred the property into the PRLT, an irrevocable trust, (2) the transferor is the beneficiary of the trust, and (3) legal title to the property in trust is held by a third party as trustee. The provisions of the trust provide, however, that the trustee shall not act unless instructed to do so by the trust beneficiary and that the trustee shall not manage nor operate the trust properties. Law and Analysis—Overview of Business Trusts & California Land Trusts (Illinois Land Trusts) It is quite likely that you will come across trusts other than ordinary, inter vivos revocable trusts. -
The Virginia Land Trust-An Overlooked Title Holding Device for Investment, Business and Estate Planning Purposes, 30 Wash
Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 30 | Issue 1 Article 4 Spring 3-1-1973 The irV ginia Land Trust-An Overlooked Title Holding Device for Investment, Business and Estate Planning Purposes Peter A. Arntson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr Part of the Estates and Trusts Commons, and the Property Law and Real Estate Commons Recommended Citation Peter A. Arntson, The Virginia Land Trust-An Overlooked Title Holding Device for Investment, Business and Estate Planning Purposes, 30 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 73 (1973), https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol30/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington and Lee Law Review at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington and Lee Law Review by an authorized editor of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE VIRGINIA LAND TRUST-AN OVERLOOKED TITLE HOLDING DEVICE FOR INVESTMENT, BUSINESS AND ESTATE PLANNING PURPOSES PETER A. ARNTSON* Ten years ago, the General Assembly by statute validated the Illinois Land Trust in Virginia.' As might be expected following the introduction of any new method of holding title to real estate, it met with mixed reactions. The land trust was welcomed by the banks and trust companies which hoped that it would quickly become accepted as a method of syndication.2 Almost immediately, possible legal problems were raised which naturally hindered its growth; 3 probably as a result of the ques- tions raised, the Virginia land trust has, during the first ten years of its existence, failed to win the acceptance by real estate developers and inves- tors that had been anticipated by its proponents.' With some planning, however, and possibly later through statutory amendment, the problems can be overcome or removed, and the Virginia land trust may serve the purposes for which it was designed. -
Pacific Crest Trail Association Corporate Partnership Opportunities
Pacific Crest Trail Association Corporate Partnership Opportunities The Pacific Crest Trail Association The Pacific Crest Trail Association: New Partnership Opportunities “The Pacific Crest Trail is a lot more than a trail – it’s a journey of a lifetime. The Trail is more than a line on the land, it stands as a vision....” - Secretary of Interior Babbitt The Pacific Crest Trail provides millions with the chance to get lost, healthy, active, spiritual, inspired, and involved. In our modern lives, stuck behind cubicles and computers, these opportunities aren’t just timely – they’re essential. Freedom and opportunity define the Pacific TCrest Trail Association. 2,650 miles from Mexico to Canada. Traversing the most beautiful wilderness in America and the eighth largest economy in the World, the Trail runs the length of California, Oregon and Washington. And it’s within hours of our nation’s biggest, fastest growing and most diverse urban centers. Within driving distance of millions, this unparalleled natural beauty is open to all -- men and women, young and old, people of all races, creeds and levels of ability can experience the Trail. Today, the Pacific Crest Trail Association is proud to announce new opportunities. We’re making a renewed commitment to fully engage our partners in everything the Trail offers.By partnering with us, you’ll help get youth outside and active, protect some of the most beautiful natural areas in America, communicate your commitment to a healthy and sustainable future, and access a potent symbol of the dreams -
Comment from the Pacific Northwest Trail Association to the Environmental Quality Council Thank You for the Opportunity to Addre
Comment from the Pacific Northwest Trail Association to the Environmental Quality Council Thank you for the opportunity to address, for the record, a proposal to relocate the Pacific Northwest National Scenic Trail (“PNNST”). We are respectively the President and Executive Director of the Pacific Northwest Trail Association – originally formed in the 1970s to advocate for the designation of the PNNST. Since the PNNST was designated by Congress in 2009, we have focused on providing educational opportunities for youth and, in connection with the U.S. Forest Service, on working to maintain and improve the PNNST. In addition, we have participated in the Advisory Council empaneled by the Forest Service in 2015, to help in the preparation of a comprehensive management plan for the PNNST. We will likely participate again once the Advisory Council has been re-appointed. There has been some misinformation in the press of late about how the PNNST came to be designated by Congress. There was no ‘secret midnight rider.’ Rather, a bill to designate the PNNST was introduced in the Senate by Senators Cantwell and Murray on April 30, 2008. It was assigned to committee, and the appropriate subcommittee (with included, at the time, Montana’s then-junior senator) held a hearing on June 17, 2008. PNTA’s acting director testified in favor of the bill, and noted for the record letters of support from the then-mayor of Eureka, Montana, and the Tobacco Valley Backcountry Horsemen, among others. The bill was marked up in committee on September 11, 2008, and reported out of committee on September 16, 2008. -
2020 PNTS Case Statement
ABOUT THE PARTNERSHIP FOR THE NATIONAL TRAILS SYSTEM Photo Credit: Pacific Northwest Trail Association WHO WE ARE The Partnership for the National Trails System (PNTS) is a 501(c)(3) that connects 30 member nonprofit trail organizations, nine affiliate members, and Federal land managers to further the protection, completion, and stewardship of the 30 national scenic and historic trails within the National Trails System. 125 young trail professional scholarships since 2009 Represent 55,000 miles $28.7 million in Federal $402 million of congressionally authorized funding matched with over recorded in volunteer trails in all 50 states and labor since 1995 in private Washington, D.C. Represent$39.7 a million powerful 2:1 publicand in-kind private contributions partnership in 2019 Photo Credit: Pacific Northwest Trail Association Recruited more than 20.1 million 125 scholarships awarded 40 volunteer hours recorded to young trail professionals interns to serve our since 1995 since 2009 national trails since 2018 www.pnts.org · 306 E. Wilson St., Suite 2E · Madison, Wisconsin 53703 · 608.249.7870 2020 National Scenic and Historic Trails Map provided by Matt Robinson, National Park Service Photo Credit: (L-R) Jacob Torres, Chelsea Bodamer, Jacob Torres, PNTS ACHIEVEMENTS IN ADVOCACY The PNTS is a leader in national advocacy efforts and is a trusted voice to ensure our national trails are funded and protected. Our successes include: 1 Raising Federal agency trails funding from $2 million to $28 million annually. 2 Actively engaging in reauthorization of the Land and Water Conservation Fund and its permanent funding. 3 Successfully advocating for funding full-time administrators for each of the national scenic and historic trails. -
February 6, 2020 KATHY DECOSTER, ADVOCACY & POLICY DIRECTOR STATEMENT to the U.S
February 6, 2020 KATHY DECOSTER, ADVOCACY & POLICY DIRECTOR STATEMENT TO THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE ON INTERIOR, ENVIRONMENT & RELATED AGENCIES Chair McCollum, Ranking Member Joyce and members of the subcommittee: The Partnership for the National Trails System is grateful for the opportunity to provide testimony today. We urge your continued support in the FY 2021 Interior, Environment and Related Agencies appropriations bill for investments in America’s National Trails System and for attention to specific needs of the 30 national trails administered by the National Park Service, the US Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management. This Subcommittee’s continued support for the various needs of the National Trails System in the FY 2020 bill is most appreciated and builds on efforts over the past 25 years to support trails that make up the system. We also appreciate your continuing efforts to increase appropriations for the Land and Water Conservation Fund as we work towards full funding and thank you for supporting LWCF investments in the trails. The National Trails System is a bold experiment in public/private collaboration for public benefit. While most of the trail making is done by tens of thousands of citizen stewards increased funding is needed to close gaps in these trails. To continue the progress that you have fostered with an increased investment in the National Trails System, the Partnership requests that you provide annual operations funding for each of the 30 national scenic and historic trails for Fiscal Year 2021 through these appropriations: • National Park Service: $17.014 million for administration of 23 trails and for coordination of the long-distance trails program by the Washington office. -
Accreditedlandtrusts.Pdf
Accredited Land Trusts CONGRATULATIONS TO THE FOLLOWING LAND CONSERVATION GROUPS NATIONAL · Sacramento Valley Conservancy · Lyme Land Conservation Trust · Access Fund · San Diego Habitat Conservancy · Naromi Land Trust · Ducks Unlimited and its affiliate, · San Joaquin River Parkway · New Canaan Land Trust Wetlands America Trust and Conservation Trust · Newtown Forest Association · The Conservation Fund and its affiliate, · Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority · Norfolk Land Trust Sustainable Conservation · Save Mount Diablo · Redding Land Trust · The Nature Conservancy · Save the Redwoods League · Roxbury Land Trust · The Trust for Public Land · Sempervirens Fund · Salem Land Trust · The Wilderness Land Trust · Sequoia Riverlands Trust · Salisbury Association · Shasta Land Trust · Sharon Land Trust · Sierra Foothill Conservancy · Steep Rock Association ALABAMA · Solano Land Trust · Warren Land Trust · Freshwater Land Trust · Sonoma Land Trust · Weantinoge Heritage Land Trust · Land Trust of North Alabama · Sutter Buttes Regional Land Trust · Winchester Land Trust · Weeks Bay Foundation · Tejon Ranch Conservancy · Wyndham Land Trust · Transition Habitat Conservancy · Tri-Valley Conservancy ALASKA FLORIDA · Truckee Donner Land Trust · Great Land Trust · Ventura Land Trust · Alachua Conservation Trust · Interior Alaska Land Trust · Wildlife Heritage Foundation · Conservation Florida · Kachemak Heritage Land Trust · Conservation Foundation of the Gulf Coast · Southeast Alaska Land Trust · North Florida Land Trust COLORADO · Tall Timbers -
Litigating the Suit to Set Aside a Fraudulent Transfer
Litigating the Suit to Set 14 Aside a Fraudulent Transfer ANDREW R. SCHWARTZ THOMAS J. KANYOCK Schwartz & Kanyock, LLC Chicago I. Introduction A. [14.1] What Is a “Fraudulent Transfer”? B. [14.2] Parties to the Fraudulent Transfer Action C. The Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act 1. [14.3] Legislative Intent 2. [14.4] Prior Law II. [14.5] Types of Fraudulent Transfers A. [14.6] Fraud in Fact B. [14.7] Fraud in Law C. [14.8] Preferential Fraudulent Transfers to Insiders III. [14.9] Defenses to Fraudulent Transfer Claims A. Intent 1. [14.10] Fraud in Fact 2. [14.11] Fraud in Law B. Solvency 1. [14.12] Fraud in Fact 2. [14.13] Fraud in Law C. [14.14] Bona Fide Purchaser/Good-Faith Transferee 1. [14.15] Fraud in Fact 2. [14.16] Fraud in Law D. [14.17] Transfers for Value 1. [14.18] Fraud in Fact 2. [14.19] Fraud in Law E. [14.20] Statute of Limitations 1. [14.21] Fraud in Fact 2. [14.22] Fraud in Law F. Tenancy by the Entirety 1. [14.23] Statutory Background 2. [14.24] Initial Caselaw 3. [14.25] August 1997 Amendment to 735 ILCS 5/12-112 4. [14.26] Decisions Construing the 1997 Amendment to 735 ILCS 5/12-112 G. Family Expenses 1. [14.27] Spousal Support Obligations 2. [14.28] Family Expense Statute H. [14.29] Wages 1. [14.30] Wages Are Not Exempt in Illinois 2. [14.31] Wage Garnishment Limitations 3. [14.32] Wienco and California-Peterson 4. [14.33] Statutorily Exempt Property Is Never Automatically Exempted I.