DOCSLIB.ORG

David Schmeidler, Professor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
David Schmeidler, Professor David Schmeidler, Professor List of Publications and Discussion Papers: Articles in Journals David Schmeidler, Competitive equilibria in markets with a continuum of traders and incomplete preferences, Econometrica, Vol. 37, 578-86 (1969). David Schmeidler, The nucleolus of a characteristic function game, SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, Vol. 17, 1163-70 (1969). David Schmeidler, Fatou's Lemma in several dimensions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., Vol. 24, 300-6 (1970). David Schmeidler, A condition for the completeness of partial preference relations, Econometrica, Vol. 39, 403-4 (1971). David Schmeidler, Cores of exact games, I, J. Math. Anal. and Appl., Vol. 40, 214- 25 (1972). David Schmeidler, On set correspondences into uniformly convex Banach spaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., Vol. 34, 97-101(1972). David Schmeidler, A remark on the core of an atomless economy, Econometrica, Vol. 40, 579-80 (1972). David Schmeidler and Karl Vind, Fair net trades, Econometrica, Vol. 40, 637-42 (1972). Jaques Dreze, Joan Gabszewicz, David Schmeidler and Karl Vind, Cores and prices in an exchange economy with an atomless sector, Econometrica, Vol. 40, 1091-108 (1972). David Schmeidler, Equilibrium points of non-atomic games, Journal of Statistical Physics, Vol. 7, 295-301 (1973). Werner Hildenbrand, David Schmeidler and Shmuel Zamir, Existence of approximate equilibria and cores, Econometrica, Vol. 41, 1159-66 (1973). Elisha A. Pazner and David Schmeidler, A difficulty in the concept of fairness, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 41, 441-3 (1974). Elisha A. Pazner and David Schmeidler, Competitive analysis under complete ignorance, International Economic Review, Vol. 16, 246-57 (1975). Elisha A. Pazner and David Schmeidler, Social contract theory and ordinal distributive equity, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 5, 261-8 (1976). Ehud Kalai, Elisha A. Pazner and David Schmeidler, Collective choice correspondences as admissible outcomes of social bargaining processes, Econometrica, Vol. 44, 233-40 (1976). Edi Karni and David Schmeidler, Independence of non-feasible alternatives and independence of non-optimal alternatives, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 12, 488- 93 (1976). Ehud Kalai and David Schmeidler, An admissible set occurring in various bargaining situations, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 14, 902-11 (1977). Ehud Kalai and David Schmeidler, Aggregation procedure for cardinal preferences: A formulation and proof of Samuelson's Impossibility Conjecture, Econometrica, Vol. 45, 1431-8 (1977). Andrew Postlewaite and David Schmeidler, Approximate efficiency of non- Walrasian Nash equilibria, Econometrica, Vol. 46, 127-35 (1978). Gerald Jaynes, Masahiro Okuno and David Schmeidler, Efficiency in an atomless economy with Fiat money, International Economic Review, Vol. 19, 149-56 (1978). Leonid Hurwicz and David Schmeidler, Construction of outcome functions guaranteeing existence and Pareto optimality of Nash equilibria, Econometrica, Vol. 46, 1447-74 (1978). Elisha A. Pazner and David Schmeidler, Decentralization and income distribution in socialist economies, Economic Inquiry, Vol. 16, 257-64 (1978). Elisha A. Pazner and David Schmeidler, Egalitarian equivalent allocations: A new concept of economic equity, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 92, 671-87 (1978). David Schmeidler, A bibliographical note on a theorem of Hardy, Littlewood and Polya , Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 20, 125-8 (1979). David Schmeidler, Walrasian analysis via strategic outcome functions , Econometrica, Vol. 48, 1585-93 (1980). Andrew Postlewaite and David Schmeidler, Approximate Walrasian equilibria and nearby economies, International Economic Review, Vol. 22, 105-11 (1981). David Schmeidler, A condition guaranteeing that the Nash allocation is Walrasian , Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 28, 376-8 (1981). Edi Karni, David Schmeidler and Karl Vind, On state dependent preferences and subjective probabilities, Econometrica, Vol. 51, 1021-31 (1983). Edi Karni and David Schmeidler, Self-preservation as a foundation of rational behavior under risk, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 7, 71-81 (1986) David Schmeidler, Integral representation without additivity , Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Vol. 97, 255-61 (1986). Andrew Postlewaite and David Schmeidler, Implementation in differential information economies, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 39, 14-32 (1986). Andrew Postlewaite and David Schmeidler, Strategic behavior and a notion of ex ante efficiency in a voting model, Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 3, 37-49 (1986). Itzhak Gilboa and David Schmeidler, Information dependent games: Can common sense be common knowledge?, Economics Letters, Vol. 27, 215-21 (1988). Sergiu Hart and David Schmeidler, Existence of correlated equilibria, Math. of O.R., Vol. 14, 18-25 (1989). David Schmeidler, Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity , Econometrica, Vol. 57, 571-87 (1989). Itzhak Gilboa and David Schmeidler, Maximin expected utility with a non-unique prior, J. of Math. Economics, Vol. 18, 141-53 (1989). Edi Karni and David Schmeidler, Fixed preferences and changing tastes, American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), Vol. 80, 262-7 (1990). Edi Karni and David Schmeidler, Atemporal dynamic consistency and expected utility theory, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 54, 401-8 (1991). Mark Machina and David Schmeidler, A more robust definition of subjective probability, Econometrica, Vol. 60, 745-80 (1992). Edi Karni and David Schmeidler, On the uniqueness of subjective probability, Economic Theory, Vol.3, 267-77 (1993). Itzhak Gilboa and David Schmeidler, Updating ambiguous beliefs, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 59, 33-49 (1993). Itzhak Gilboa and David Schmeidler, Infinite histories and steady orbits in repeated games, Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 6, 370-99 (1994). Sergiu Hart, Salvatore Modica and David Schmeidler, A Neo2Bayesian foundation of the maxmin value for two-person zero-sum games, International Journal of Game Theory, Vol. 23, 347-58 (1994). Itzhak Gilboa and David Schmeidler, Additive representations of non-additive measures and the Choquet integral, Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 51, 43-65 (1994). David Schmeidler and Yair Tauman, Incentive-compatible cost allocation schemes, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 63,189-207 (1994). Itzhak Gilboa and David Schmeidler, Canonical representations of set- functions, Mathematics of Operations Research, Vol. 20, 197-212 (1995). Itzhak Gilboa and David Schmeidler, Case-based decision theory, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 110, 605-39 (1995). Mark Machina and David Schmeidler, Bayes without Bernoulli: Conditions for probabilistically sophisticated choice, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 67, 106-28 (1995). Itzhak Gilboa and David Schmeidler, Case-based optimization, Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 15, 1-26 (1996). Itzhak Gilboa and David Schmeidler, Act-similarity in case-based decision theory, Economic Theory, Vol. 9, 47-61 (1997). Elchanan Ben-Porath. Itzhak Gilboa and David Schmeidler, Social welfare under uncertainty, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 75, 194-204 (1997). Itzhak Gilboa and David Schmeidler, Cumulative utility consumer theory (previous title: Case-based consumer theory), International Economic Review, Vol. 38, 737-61 (1997). Itzhak Gilboa and David Schmeidler, Case-based knowledge and induction, IEEE SMC Transactions Part A, Vol. 30, 85-95 (2000). Michèle Cohen, Itzhak Gilboa, Jean-Yves Jaffray and David Schmeidler, An experimental study of updating ambiguous beliefs, Risk, Decision and Policy, Vol. 5, 123 – 33, (2000). Also appeared in theProceedings of ISIPTA99. Itzhak Gilboa and David Schmeidler, A cognitive model of individual well- being, Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 18, 269 – 88 (2001). Itzhak Gilboa and David Schmeidler, Reaction to price changes and aspiration level adjustments, Review of Economic Design, Vol. 6, 215 – 23 (2001). Itzhak Gilboa and David Schmeidler, Cognitive foundations of probability, Mathematics of Operations Research, Vol. 27, 68 – 81 (2002). Itzhak Gilboa, David Schmeidler and Peter Wakker, Utility in case-based decision theory, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 105, 483 – 502 (2002). Itzhak Gilboa and David Schmeidler, Inductive inference: An axiomatic approach, Econometrica, Vol. 71, 1-26 (2003). Dov Samet and David Schmeidler, Between liberalism and democracy, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 110, 213 – 33 (2003). Itzhak Gilboa and David Schmeidler, A derivation of expected utility maximization in the context of a game, Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 44, 172 – 82 (2003). Dov Samet, Iddo Samet and David Schmeidler, One observation behind two- envelope puzzles, American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 111, 347 – 51 (2004). Itzhak Gilboa, Dov Samet and David Schmeidler, Utilitarian Aggregation of Beliefs and Tastes, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 112, 932-8 (2004). Itzhak Gilboa and David Schmeidler, Subjective distributions, Theory and Decision , Vol. 56, 345-57 (2004). Antoine Billot, Itzhak Gilboa, Dov Samet and David Schmeidler, Probabilities as Similarity-Weighted Frequencies , Econometrica, Vol. 73, 1125-36 (2005). Enriqueta Aragones, Itzhak Gilboa, Andrew Postlewaite and David Schmeidler, Fact Free Learning , American Economic Review, Vol 95, 1355-68, (2005). Itzhak Gilboa, Offer Lieberman and David Schmeidler, Empirical Similarity , Review of Economics and Statistics,Vol. 88, 433-44 (2006). Antoine Billot, Itzhak Gilboa and David Schmeidler, Axiomatization of an Exponential Similarity Function
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Viable Nash Equilibria: Formation and Defection (Feb 2020)
    VIABLE NASH EQUILIBRIA: FORMATION AND DEFECTION (FEB 2020) EHUD KALAI In memory of John Nash Abstract. To be credible, economic analysis should restrict itself to the use of only those Nash equilibria that are viable. To assess the viability of an equilibrium , I study simple dual indices: a formation index, F (), that speci…es the number of loyalists needed to form ; and a defection index, D(), that speci…es the number of defectors that can sustain. Surprisingly, these simple indices (1) predict the performance of Nash equilibria in social systems and lab experiments, and (2) uncover new prop- erties of Nash equilibria and stability issues that have so far eluded game theory re…nements. JEL Classi…cation Codes: C0, C7, D5, D9. 1. Overview Current economic analysis often relies on the notion of a Nash equilibrium. Yet there are mixed opinions about the viability of this notion. On the one hand, many equilibria, referred to as viable in this paper, play critical roles in functioning social systems and perform well in lab and …eld experiments. Date: March 9, 2018, this version Feb 24, 2020. Key words and phrases. Normal form games, Nash equilibrium, Stability, Fault tolerance, Behavioral Economics. The author thanks the following people for helpful conversations: Nemanja Antic, Sunil Chopra, Vince Crawford, K…r Eliaz, Drew Fudenberg, Ronen Gradwohl, Yingni Guo, Adam Kalai, Fern Kalai, Martin Lariviere, Eric Maskin, Rosemarie Nagel, Andy Postlewaite, Larry Samuelson, David Schmeidler, James Schummer, Eran Shmaya, Joel Sobel, and Peyton Young; and seminar participants at the universities of the Basque Country, Oxford, Tel Aviv, Yale, Stanford, Berkeley, Stony Brook, Bar Ilan, the Technion, and the Hebrew University.
    [Show full text]
  • Updating Beliefs When Evidence Is Open to Interpretation: Implications for Bias and Polarization∗
    Updating Beliefs when Evidence is Open to Interpretation: Implications for Bias and Polarization∗ Roland G. Fryer, Jr., Philipp Harms, and Matthew O. Jacksony This Version: October 2017 Forthcoming in Journal of the European Economic Association Abstract We introduce a model in which agents observe signals about the state of the world, some of which are open to interpretation. Our decision makers first interpret each signal and then form a posterior on the sequence of interpreted signals. This `double updating' leads to confirmation bias and can lead agents who observe the same information to polarize. We explore the model's predictions in an on-line experiment in which individuals interpret research summaries about climate change and the death penalty. Consistent with the model, there is a significant relationship between an individual's prior and their interpretation of the summaries; and - even more striking - over half of the subjects exhibit polarizing behavior. JEL classification numbers: D10, D80, J15, J71, I30 Keywords: beliefs, polarization, learning, updating, Bayesian updating, biases, dis- crimination, decision making ∗We are grateful to Sandro Ambuehl, Ken Arrow, Tanaya Devi, Juan Dubra, Jon Eguia, Ben Golub, Richard Holden, Lawrence Katz, Peter Klibanoff, Scott Kominers, Franziska Michor, Giovanni Parmigiani, Matthew Rabin, Andrei Shleifer, and Joshua Schwartzein for helpful comments and suggestions. Adriano Fernandes provided exceptional research assistance. yFryer is at the Department of Economics, Harvard University, and the NBER, ([email protected]); Jackson is at the Department of Economics, Stanford University, the Santa Fe Institute, and CIFAR (jack- [email protected]); and Harms is at the Department of Mathematical Stochastics, University of Freiburg, ([email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • DP Cover1512 Kalai.Cdr
    Discussion Paper #1512 June 16, 2010 A A Cooperative Value for Bayesian Games Key words: cooperative game theory, non- cooperative game theory, bargaining, min-max value JEL classification: C70, C71, C72, C78 Adam Kalai Microsoft Research Ehud Kalai Northwestern University www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/research/math everone Hall Evanston, IL 60208-2014 US CMS-EMS oad 580 L The Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics & Management Sciences Northwestern University 2001 Sheridan R A COOPERATIVE VALUE FOR BAYESIAN GAMES ADAM TAUMAN KALAI∗ AND EHUD KALAIy;x Abstract. Selfish, strategic players may benefit from cooperation, provided they reach agreement. It is therefore important to construct mechanisms that facilitate such cooperation, especially in the case of asymmetric private information. The two major issues are: (1) singling out a fair and efficient outcome among the many individually rational possibilities in a strategic game, and (2) establishing a play protocol under which strategic players may achieve this outcome. The paper presents a general solution for two-person Bayesian games with monetary payoffs, under a strong revealed-payoff assumption. The proposed solution builds upon earlier concepts in game theory. It coincides with the von Neumann minmax value on the class of zero sum games and with the major solution concepts to the Nash Bargaining Problem. Moreover, the solution is based on a simple decomposition of every game into cooperative and competitive components, which is easy to compute. 1. Introduction Selfish players in strategic games benefit from cooperation, provided they come to mutually beneficial agreements. In the case of asymmetric private information, the benefits may be even greater, but avoiding strategic manipulations is more subtle.
    [Show full text]
  • (Eds.) Foundations in Microeconomic Theory Hugo F
    Matthew O. Jackson • Andrew McLennan (Eds.) Foundations in Microeconomic Theory Hugo F. Sonnenschein Matthew O. Jackson • Andrew McLennan (Eds.) Foundations in Microeconomic Theory A Volume in Honor of Hugo F. Sonnenschein ^ Springer Professor Matthew O. Jackson Professor Andrew McLennan Stanford University School of Economics Department of Economics University of Queensland Stanford, CA 94305-6072 Rm. 520, Colin Clark Building USA The University of Queensland [email protected] NSW 4072 Australia [email protected] ISBN: 978-3-540-74056-8 e-ISBN: 978-3"540-74057-5 Library of Congress Control Number: 2007941253 © 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9,1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Violations are liable to prosecution under the German Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design: WMX Design GmbH, Heidelberg Printed on acid-free paper 987654321 spnnger.com Contents Introduction 1 A Brief Biographical Sketch of Hugo F. Sonnenschein 5 1 Kevin C. Sontheimer on Hugo F.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Market for Non-Prime Mortgage-Based Securities Br
    Made centro de pesquisa em macroeconomia das desigualdades Working Paper 18.01.2021 nº 003 Conventions and the process of market formation: the case of the market for non-prime mortgage-based securities Bruno Höfig Abstract 18.01.2021 nº 003 The article develops the hypothesis that conventions can be key to the development of markets for previously untraded financial assets. It argues that the absence of historical data on the performance of Bruno Höfig Ph.D. in Economics - SOAS, assets may induce agents to form beliefs in ways that University of London preclude the formation of markets for certain financial bhofi[email protected] instruments. Conversely, in the absence of trading, the data on the basis of which agents could revise their The author would like to thank Alfredo Saad-Filho, Pedro beliefs will not be produced, giving rise to a feedback Mendes Loureiro, Camila Alves loop that hinders the process of market-formation. de André, Leonardo Müller, The article contends that one of the ways of Tomás Gotta and Matías Vernengo for comments on overcoming this state is the development of earlier drafts of this article. The conventions about the distribution of future payofs. It usual disclaimers apply. then shows that the emergence of the conventions that credit rating agencies could reliably measure the riskiness of non-prime residential mortgage-securities (RMBSs), and that the FICO score could reliably give a quantitative expression of the creditworthiness of individual borrowers was a crucial enabling condition of the formation of a market for RMBSs in the United States. Keywords: conventional valuation, probability, mortgage-backed securities, credit rating agencies, credit scores.
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew O. Jackson
    Matthew O. Jackson Department of Economics Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6072 (650) 723-3544, fax: 725-5702, [email protected] http://www.stanford.edu/ jacksonm/ ⇠ Personal: Born 1962. Married to Sara Jackson. Daughters: Emilie and Lisa. Education: Ph.D. in Economics from the Graduate School of Business, Stanford Uni- versity, 1988. Bachelor of Arts in Economics, Summa Cum Laude, Phi Beta Kappa, Princeton University, 1984. Full-Time Appointments: 2008-present, William D. Eberle Professor of Economics, Stanford Univer- sity. 2006-2008, Professor of Economics, Stanford University. 2002-2006, Edie and Lew Wasserman Professor of Economics, California Institute of Technology. 1997-2002, Professor of Economics, California Institute of Technology. 1996-1997, IBM Distinguished Professor of Regulatory and Competitive Practices MEDS department (Managerial Economics and Decision Sci- ences), Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern Univer- sity. 1995-1996, Mechthild E. Nemmers Distinguished Professor MEDS, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University. 1993-1994 , Professor (MEDS), Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University. 1991-1993, Associate Professor (MEDS), Kellogg Graduate School of Man- agement, Northwestern University. 1988-1991, Assistant Professor, (MEDS), Kellogg Graduate School of Man- agement, Northwestern University. Honors : Jean-Jacques La↵ont Prize, Toulouse School of Economics 2020. President, Game Theory Society, 2020-2022, Exec VP 2018-2020. Game Theory Society Fellow, elected 2017. John von Neumann Award, Rajk L´aszl´oCollege, 2015. Member of the National Academy of Sciences, elected 2015. Honorary Doctorate (Doctorat Honoris Causa), Aix-Marseille Universit´e, 2013. Dean’s Award for Distinguished Teaching in Humanities and Sciences, Stanford, 2013. Distinguished Teaching Award: Stanford Department of Economics, 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Games: Structural Robustness
    1 Large games: structural robustness Ehud Kalai Northwestern University Forthcoming in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics , 2 nd edition, Palgrave Macmillan ABSTRACT In simultaneous-move Bayesian games with many semi-anonymous players all the equilibria are structurally robust. The equilibria survive under structural alterations of the rules of the game and its information structure, even when the game is embedded in bigger games. Structural robustness implies ex-post Nash condition s and a stronger condition of information proofness. It also implies fast learning, self-purification and strong rational expectations in market games. Structurally robust equilibria may be used to model games with highly unspecified structures, such as games played on the web. 0. Background on large games Earlier literature on large (many players) cooperative games is surveyed in Aumann and Shapley (1974). For large strategic games, see Schmeidler (1973) and the follow-up literature on the purification of Nash equilibria. There is also substantial literature on large games with special structures, for example large auctions as reported in Rustichini, Satterthwaite, and Williams (1994). Unlike the above, this survey concentrates on the structural robustness of (general) Bayesian games with many semi-anonymous players, as developed in Kalai (2004, 2005). (For additional notions of robustness in game theory, see Bergemann and Morris, 2005). 1. Main message and examples In simultaneous-move Bayesian games with many semi-anonymous players, all Nash equilibria are structurally robust. The equilibria survive under structural alterations that 2 relax the simultaneous-play assumptions, and permit information transmission, revisions of choices, communication, commitments, delegation, and more. Large economic and political systems and distributive systems such as the Web are examples of environments that give rise to such games.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae 03/97
    CURRICULUM VITAE April 2006 Ehud Kalai, Ph.D. Home Office 1110 N. Lake Shore Dr., Apt. 23S Department of Managerial Economics and Decision Sciences Chicago, IL 60611 Kellogg School of Management Phone: (847) 571-1097 Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, 60208 Fax: (312) 482-9772 (847) 491-7017; fax (847) 467-3646 e-mail: [email protected] Born, December 7, 1942, Tel Aviv, Israel Education Cornell University, Ithaca, New York: Ph.D. in Mathematics (1972); MS in Statistics (1971). University of California, Berkeley: A.B. in Mathematics (1967). Permanent Academic Positions 09/75-present Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University: Visiting Assistant Professor (9/75-9/76), Associate Professor (9/76-9/78), Professor (9/78-9/82), The Charles E. Morrison Professor of Decision Sciences (9/82-9/2001); The James J. O'Connor Distinguished Professor of Decision and Game Sciences (9/2001 - present). 03/90-present Professor of Mathematics (courtesy), Department of Mathematics, CAS, Northwestern University. 10/72-9/75 Assistant Professor, Department of Statistics, Tel Aviv University. Editorial Positions Editor and founder, Games and Economic Behavior, Academic Press, 1988- . Member of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Game Theory, Physica Verlag, 1984- . Member of the Editorial Board of Mathematical Social Sciences, North-Holland, 1980-1993. Associate Editor, The Journal of Economic Theory, Academic Press, Inc., 1980-1988. Other Positions President of the Game Theory Society, 2003-2006 Co Founder and Executive Vice President of the Game Theory Society, 1998-2003 Director of the Kellogg Center for Strategic Decision-Making, 1995- . Founding organizer of the Nancy L.
    [Show full text]
  • Seminar 2020 Adams Seminar 2020 סמינר אדמס תש״ף
    סמינר תש״ף | Seminar 2020 Adams Seminar 2020 סמינר אדמס תש״ף Guest Lecturer Prof. Daniel A. Chamovitz Professor of Plant Pathology President, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Editor Deborah Greniman Photographers Michal Fattal, Udi Katzman, Sasson Tiram Graphic Design Navi Katzman-Kaduri The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities P.O.Box 4040 Jerusalem 9104001 Tel 972-2-5676207 E-mail [email protected] www.adams.academy.ac.il The Adams Fellowships is a joint program of the late Mr. Marcel Adams of Canada and the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities. Chartered by law in 1961, the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities acts as a national focal point for Israeli scholarship in both the natural sciences and the humanities and social sciences. The Academy consists of approximately 135 of Israel’s most distinguished scientists and scholars, who, with the help of the Academy’s staff and committees, monitor and promote Israeli intellectual excellence, advise the government on scientific planning, fund and publish research of lasting merit, and maintain active contact with the broader international scientific and scholarly community. For more information, please send an e-mail to [email protected] or call 972-2-5676207. Visit our website: adams.academy.ac.il Adams Seminar 2020 | 3 The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities expresses its enduring appreciation for the legacy of Mr. Marcel Adams who passed away shortly after his 100th birthday. His generosity in promoting higher education in Israel lives on. Adams Fellowships Marcel Adams Hebrew-speaking philanthropist Marcel Adams, who escaped from a forced-labor camp in Romania in 1944, fought in Israel’s War of Independence and made his fortune in Montreal, has endowed the Adams Fellowship Program to support Israel’s brightest doctoral students in the natural and exact sciences each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Rational Choice As a Toolbox for the Economist: an Interview with Itzhak Gilboa
    Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, Volume 7, Issue 2, Autumn 2014, pp. 116-141. http://ejpe.org/pdf/7-2-int.pdf Rational choice as a toolbox for the economist: an interview with Itzhak Gilboa CATHERINE HERFELD Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Itzhak Gilboa (Tel Aviv, 1963) is currently professor of economics at the Eitan Berglas School of Economics at Tel-Aviv University and professor of economics and decision sciences at the Hautes Études Commerciales (HEC) in Paris. He earned undergraduate degrees in mathematics and in economics at Tel Aviv University, where he also obtained his MA and PhD in economics under the supervision of David Schmeidler. Before joining Tel Aviv University in 2004 and the HEC in 2008, Gilboa taught at the J. L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University, the University of Pennsylvania, and Boston University. Gilboa’s main area of interest is decision-making under uncertainty, focusing on the definition of probability, notions of rationality, non- Bayesian decision models, and related issues. He has published broadly in areas such as decision and game theory, microeconomics, philosophy, social choice theory, and applied mathematics. He has written over 90 articles in these fields. Gilboa has furthermore written a textbook entitled Rational choice (Gilboa 2010a), in which he lays out what he takes to be the main toolbox for studying and improving human decision-making. Additional books include A theory of case-based decisions (Gilboa and Schmeidler 2001), Theory of decision under uncertainty (Gilboa 2009), Making better decisions (Gilboa 2010b), and Case-based predictions (Gilboa and Schmeidler 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Nancy L. Stokey
    March 2021 NANCY L. STOKEY Office Address Home Address Kenneth C. Griffin Department of Economics 320 W. Oakdale Ave., #1903 University of Chicago Chicago, IL 60657 1126 East 59th Street Chicago, IL 60637 Telephone: 773-702-0915 Telephone: 773-477-9640 Fax: 773-702-8490 E-mail: nstokey[at]uchicago.edu Education Doctor of Philosophy in Economics, Harvard University, 1978. Bachelor of Arts in Economics, University of Pennsylvania, 1972. Professional Experience Distinguished Service Professor, 2004-present, University of Chicago; Frederick Henry Prince Professor of Economics, 1997-2004; Professor of Economics, 1990-1996. Visiting Scholar of the Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Fall 2000, Fall 2001, Fall 2002, Fall 2003, Fall 2009, Fall 2010, Fall 2011, Fall 2013, Fall 2018. Harold L. Stuart Professor of Managerial Economics, 1988-90, Department of Managerial Economics and Decision Sciences, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University; Department Chairman, 1987-89; Professor, 1983-87; Associate Professor, 1982-83; Assistant Professor, 1978-82. Visiting Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, University of Chicago, 1983-84. Visiting Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, University of Minnesota, Spring 1983. Visiting Lecturer on Economics, Department of Economics, Harvard University, Fall 1982. Professional Activities and Awards President, Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), January 1 – December 31, 2021. American Academy of Arts and Sciences Class III, Section 2 (Economics) Membership Panel, 2019-20. American Academy of Arts and Sciences Class III, Section 2 (Economics) Membership Panel, 2018-19. CME Group-MSRI Prize Committee, 2018-19. Plenary Speaker, Society for Economic Dynamics, Mexico City, June, 2018. Plenary Speaker, Tsinghua Workshop in Macroeconomics, Beijing, June, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • A Simple Adaptive Procedure Leading to Correlated Equilibrium1
    Econometrica, Vol. 68, No. 5Ž. September, 2000 , 1127᎐1150 A SIMPLE ADAPTIVE PROCEDURE LEADING TO CORRELATED EQUILIBRIUM1 BY SERGIU HART AND ANDREU MAS-COLELL2 We propose a new and simple adaptive procedure for playing a game: ‘‘regret-match- ing.’’ In this procedure, players may depart from their current play with probabilities that are proportional to measures of regret for not having used other strategies in the past. It is shown that our adaptive procedure guarantees that, with probability one, the empirical distributions of play converge to the set of correlated equilibria of the game. KEYWORDS: Adaptive procedure, correlated equilibrium, no regret, regret-matching, simple strategies. 1. INTRODUCTION THE LEADING NONCOOPERATIVE EQUILIBRIUM NOTIONS for N-person games in strategicŽ. normal form are Nash equilibrium Ž and its refinements . and corre- lated equilibrium. In this paper we focus on the concept of correlated equilib- rium. A correlated equilibriumᎏa notion introduced by AumannŽ. 1974 ᎏcan be described as follows: Assume that, before the game is played, each player receives a private signalŽ. which does not affect the payoffs . The player may then choose his action in the game depending on this signal. A correlated equilibrium of the original game is just a Nash equilibrium of the game with the signals. Considering all possible signal structures generates all correlated equilibria. If the signals areŽ. stochastically independent across the players, it is a Nash equilibriumŽ. in mixed or pure strategies of the original game. But the signals could well be correlated, in which case new equilibria may obtain. Equivalently, a correlated equilibrium is a probability distribution on N-tuples of actions, which can be interpreted as the distribution of play instructions given to the players by some ‘‘device’’ or ‘‘referee.’’ Each player is givenᎏprivatelyᎏ instructions for his own play only; the joint distribution is known to all of them.
    [Show full text]