Risk of Acute Radiation Syndromes Due to Solar Particle Events
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Radiation Challenge Module 2: Radiation Damage in Living Organisms Educator Guide
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Faring The Radiation Challenge An Interdisciplinary Guide on Radiation and Human Space Flight Module 2: Radiation Damage in Living Organisms Educational Product Educators Grades and Students 9 – 12 EP-2007-08-117-MSFC Radiation Educator Guide Module 2: Radiation Damage in Living Organisms Prepared by: Jon Rask, M.S., ARC Education Specialist Wenonah Vercoutere, Ph.D., NASA ARC Subject Matter Expert Al Krause, MSFC Education Specialist BJ Navarro, NASA ARC Project Manager Space Faring: The Radiation Challenge i Table of Contents Module 2: Module 2: Radiation Damage in Living Organisms .............................................................................1 Why is NASA Studying the Biological Effects of Radiation? .........................................................1 How Do Scientists Study Biological Change During Spaceflight? .................................................1 Using Non-Human Organisms to Understand Radiation Damage ................................................2 What are the Risks and Symptoms of Radiation Exposure for Humans? .......................................3 What is DNA? ..............................................................................................................................3 What is the Structure of DNA? .....................................................................................................3 What is DNA’s Role in Protein Production? ..................................................................................4 -
Time, Dose and Fractionation in Radiotherapy
2/25/2013 The introduction of Fractionation 2-13/13 Radiobiology lecture Time, Dose and Fractionation in Radiotherapy The Four Rs of Radiobiology Repair of Sublethal Damage • Cells exposed to sparse radiation experience • Efficacy of fractionation based on the 4 Rs: sublethal injury that can be repaired – Repair of sublethal damage • Cell killing requires a greater total dose when given –Repopulation in several fractions – Reassortment of cells within the cell cycle • Most tissue repair occurs in about 3 hours and up –Reoxygenation to 24 hours post radiation • Allows for repair of injured normal tissue and gives a potential therapeutic advantage over tumor cells Reoxygenation Redistribution • Oxygen stabilizes free radicals • Position in cell cycle at time of radiation • Hypoxic cells require more radiation to kill determines sensitivity •Hypoxic tumors • S phase is radioresistant – Temporary vessel constriction •G2 phase delay results in increased radiation – Outgrowth of blood supply and capillary collapse resistance • Tumor shrinkage reduces hypoxic areas • Fractionated RT redistributes cells • Reinforces fractionated dosing • Rapidly cycling cells like mucosa, skin are more sensitive • Slower cyclers like connective tissue, brain are spared 1 2/25/2013 Repopulation • Increased regeneration of surviving fraction Basics of Fractionation • Rapidly proliferating tumors regenerate faster • Determines the length and timing of therapy course • Dividing a dose into several fractions spares normal tissues • Accelerated Repopulation – Repair -
RADIATION EFFECTS and SOURCES What Is Radiation? What Does Radiation Do to Us? Where Does Radiation Come From?
RADIATION EFFECTS and SOURCES What is radiation? What does radiation do to us? Where does radiation come from? United Nations Environment Programme RADIATION EFFECTS and SOURCES What is radiation? What does radiation do to us? Where does radiation come from? United Nations Environment Programme DISCLAIMER This publication is largely based on the findings of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, a subsidiary body of the United Nations General Assembly and for which the United Nations Environment Pro- gramme provides the secretariat. This publication does not necessarily r epresent the views of the Scientific Committee or of the United Nations Environment Programme. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publica- tion do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. The United Nations Environment Programme would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. The United Nations Environment Programme promotes environmentally sound practices globally and in its own activities. This publication was printed on recycled paper, 100 per cent chlorine free. -
Glossary Derived From: Human Research Program Integrated Research Plan, Revision A, (January 2009)
Glossary derived from: Human Research Program Integrated Research Plan, Revision A, (January 2009). National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas 77058, pages 232-280. Report No. 153: Information Needed to Make Radiation Protection Recommendations for Space Missions Beyond Low-Earth Orbit (2006). National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, pages 309-318. Reprinted with permission of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, http://NCRPonline.org . Managing Space Radiation Risk in the New Era of Space Exploration (2008). Committee on the Evaluation of Radiation Shielding for Space Exploration, National Research Council. National Academies Press, pages 111-118. -A- AAPM: American Association of Physicists in Medicine. absolute risk: Expression of excess risk due to exposure as the arithmetic difference between the risk among those exposed and that obtaining in the absence of exposure. absorbed dose (D): Average amount of energy imparted by ionizing particles to a unit mass of irradiated material in a volume sufficiently small to disregard variations in the radiation field but sufficiently large to average over statistical fluctuations in energy deposition, and where energy imparted is the difference between energy entering the volume and energy leaving the volume. The same dose has different consequences depending on the type of radiation delivered. Unit: gray (Gy), equivalent to 1 J/kg. ACE: Advanced Composition Explorer Mission, launched in 1997 and orbiting the L1 libration point to sample energetic particles arriving from the Sun and interstellar and galactic sources. It also provides continuous coverage of solar wind parameters and solar energetic particle intensities (space weather). When reporting space weather, it can provide an advance warning (about one hour) of geomagnetic storms that can overload power grids, disrupt communications on Earth, and present a hazard to astronauts. -
Extreme Anti-Oxidant Protection Against Ionizing Radiation in Bdelloid Rotifers
Extreme anti-oxidant protection against ionizing radiation in bdelloid rotifers Anita Kriskoa,b, Magali Leroya, Miroslav Radmana,b, and Matthew Meselsonc,1 aInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unit 1001, Faculté de Médecine Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75751 Paris Cedex 15, France; bMediterranean Institute for Life Sciences, 21000 Split, Croatia; and cDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 Contributed by Matthew Meselson, December 6, 2011 (sent for review November 10, 2011) Bdelloid rotifers, a class of freshwater invertebrates, are extraor- in A. vaga as in other eukaryotes, and its genome is not smaller dinarily resistant to ionizing radiation (IR). Their radioresistance is than that of C. elegans (1). Instead, it has been proposed that a not caused by reduced susceptibility to DNA double-strand break- major contributor to bdelloid radiation resistance is an enhanced age for IR makes double-strand breaks (DSBs) in bdelloids with capacity for scavenging reactive molecular species generated by IR essentially the same efficiency as in other species, regardless of and that the proteins and other cellular components thereby radiosensitivity. Instead, we find that the bdelloid Adineta vaga is protected include those essential for the repair of DSBs but not far more resistant to IR-induced protein carbonylation than is the DNA itself (1). In agreement with this explanation, we find that much more radiosensitive nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.In A. vaga is far more resistant than C. elegans to IR-induced protein both species, the dose–response for protein carbonylation parallels carbonylation, a reaction of hydroxyl radicals with accessible side that for fecundity reduction, manifested as embryonic death. -
Exemplifying an Archetypal Thorium-EPS Complexation by Novel Thoriotolerant Providencia Thoriotolerans
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Exemplifying an archetypal thorium‑EPS complexation by novel thoriotolerant Providencia thoriotolerans AM3 Arpit Shukla 1,2, Paritosh Parmar 1, Dweipayan Goswami 1, Baldev Patel1 & Meenu Saraf 1* It is the acquisition of unique traits that adds to the enigma of microbial capabilities to carry out extraordinary processes. One such ecosystem is the soil exposed to radionuclides, in the vicinity of atomic power stations. With the aim to study thorium (Th) tolerance in the indigenous bacteria of such soil, the bacteria were isolated and screened for maximum thorium tolerance. Out of all, only one strain AM3, found to tolerate extraordinary levels of Th (1500 mg L−1), was identifed to be belonging to genus Providencia and showed maximum genetic similarity with the type strain P. vermicola OP1T. This is the frst report suggesting any bacteria to tolerate such high Th and we propose to term such microbes as ‘thoriotolerant’. The medium composition for cultivating AM3 was optimized using response surface methodology (RSM) which also led to an improvement in its Th‑tolerance capabilities by 23%. AM3 was found to be a good producer of EPS and hence one component study was also employed for its optimization. Moreover, the EPS produced by the strain showed interaction with Th, which was deduced by Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Te afermaths of atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (1945), more than 2000 nuclear tests (1945–2017), the Chernobyl nuclear power plant disaster (1986) and more recently, the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster (2011), highlight the release of considerable radioactive waste (radwaste) to the environment use of various radionuclides has led to the creation of considerable radioactive waste (radwaste). -
Reduced Fractionation in Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Curative-Intent Radiotherapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic
This document was published on 2 April 2020. Please check www.rcr.ac.uk/cancer-treatment-documents to ensure you have the latest version. This document is the collaborative work of oncologists and their teams, and is not a formal RCR guideline or consensus statement. Reduced fractionation in lung cancer patients treated with curative-intent radiotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic Corinne Faivre-Finn1,2, John D Fenwick3,4, Kevin N Franks5,6, Stephen Harrow7,8, Matthew QF Hatton9, Crispin Hiley10,11, Jonathan J McAleese12, Fiona McDonald13, Jolyne O’Hare12, Clive Peedell14, Ceri Powell15,16, Tony Pope17, Robert Rulach7,8, Elizabeth Toy18 1The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester 2The University of Manchester 3Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool 4Department of Physics, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool 5Leeds Cancer Centre 6University of Leeds 7Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow 8University of Glasgow 9Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield 10CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London 11Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London 12Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast 13The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London 14James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough 15South West Wales Cancer Centre 16Velindre Cancer Centre 17Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool 18Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust 1 This document was published on 2 April 2020. Please check www.rcr.ac.uk/cancer-treatment-documents to ensure you have the latest version. This document is the collaborative work of oncologists and their teams, and is not a formal RCR guideline or consensus statement. Introduction The World Health Organisation (WHO) declared COVID-19, the disease caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, a pandemic on the 11th of March 2020. -
Cherenkov Radiation
TheThe CherenkovCherenkov effecteffect A charged particle traveling in a dielectric medium with n>1 radiates Cherenkov radiation B Wave front if its velocity is larger than the C phase velocity of light v>c/n or > 1/n (threshold) A β Charged particle The emission is due to an asymmetric polarization of the medium in front and at the rear of the particle, giving rise to a varying electric dipole momentum. dN Some of the particle energy is convertedγ = 491into light. A coherent wave front is dx generated moving at velocity v at an angle Θc If the media is transparent the Cherenkov light can be detected. If the particle is ultra-relativistic β~1 Θc = const and has max value c t AB n 1 cosθc = = = In water Θc = 43˚, in ice 41AC˚ βct βn 37 TheThe CherenkovCherenkov effecteffect The intensity of the Cherenkov radiation (number of photons per unit length of particle path and per unit of wave length) 2 2 2 2 2 Number of photons/L and radiation d N 4π z e 1 2πz 2 = 2 1 − 2 2 = 2 α sin ΘC Wavelength depends on charge dxdλ hcλ n β λ and velocity of particle 2πe2 α = Since the intensity is proportional to hc 1/λ2 short wavelengths dominate dN Using light detectors (photomultipliers)γ = sensitive491 in 400-700 nm for an ideally 100% efficient detector in the visibledx € 2 dNγ λ2 d Nγ 2 2 λ2 dλ 2 2 11 1 22 2 d 2 z sin 2 z sin 490393 zz sinsinΘc photons / cm = ∫ λ = π α ΘC ∫ 2 = π α ΘC 2 −− 2 = α ΘC λ1 λ1 dx dxdλ λ λλ1 λ2 d 2 N d 2 N dλ λ2 d 2 N = = dxdE dxdλ dE 2πhc dxdλ Energy loss is about 104 less hc 2πhc than 2 MeV/cm in water from € -
Hypo-Fractionated FLASH-RT As an Effective Treatment Against Glioblastoma That Reduces Neurocognitive Side Effects in Mice
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on October 15, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0894 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Hypo-fractionated FLASH-RT as an effective treatment against glioblastoma that reduces neurocognitive side effects in mice Pierre Montay-Gruel1*, Munjal M. Acharya2*, Patrik Gonçalves Jorge1, 3, Benoit Petit1, Ioannis G. Petridis1, Philippe Fuchs1, Ron Leavitt1, Kristoffer Petersson1, 3, Maude Gondre1, 3, Jonathan Ollivier1, Raphael Moeckli3, François Bochud3, Claude Bailat3, Jean Bourhis1, Jean-François Germond3°, Charles L. Limoli2° and Marie-Catherine Vozenin1° 1 Department of Radiation Oncology/DO/Radio-Oncology/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland. 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2695, USA. 3 Institute of Radiation Physics/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland. *, ° contributed equally to the work Running title Sparing the cognition, not the tumor with FLASH-RT Key words FLASH radiation therapy, glioblastoma, neurocognition Financial support The study was supported by a Synergia grant from the FNS CRS II5_186369 (M-C.V. and F.B.), a grant from lead agency grant FNS/ANR CR32I3L_156924 (M-C.V. and C.B.), ISREC Foundation thank to Biltema donation (JB and MCV) and by NIH program project grant PO1CA244091 (M-C.V. and C.L.L.), NINDS grant NS089575 (C.L.L.), KL2 award KL2TR001416 (M.M.A.). P.M.-G. was supported by Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan fellowship (MESR), FNS N°31003A_156892 and ISREC Foundation thank to Biltema donation, K.P. by FNS/ANR CR32I3L_156924 and ISREC Foundation thank to Biltema donation; P.J.G. -
Influence of Radiation Damage on Xenon Diffusion in Silicon Carbide
Influence of radiation damage on xenon diffusion in silicon carbide E. Friedland*a, K. Gärtnerb, T.T. Hlatshwayoa, N.G. van der Berga, T.T. Thabethea a Physics Department, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa b Institut für Festkörperphysik, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena, Germany Keywords silicon carbide, diffusion, radiation damage *Corresponding author. E mail: [email protected], Phone: +27-12-4202453, Fax: +27-12-3625288 Diffusion of xenon in poly and single crystalline silicon carbide and the possible influence of radiation damage on it are investigated. For this purpose 360 keV xenon ions were implanted in commercial 6H-SiC and CVD-SiC wafers at room temperature, 350 °C and 600 °C. Width broadening of the implantation pro- files and xenon retention during isochronal and isothermal annealing up to temperatures of 1500 °C was de- termined by RBS-analysis, whilst in the case of 6H-SiC damage profiles were simultaneously obtained by a- particle channelling. No diffusion or xenon loss was detected in the initially amorphized and eventually re- crystallized surface layer of cold implanted 6H-SiC during annealing up to 1200 °C. Above that temperature serious erosion of the implanted surface occurred, which made any analysis impossible. No diffusion or xen- on loss is detected in the hot implanted 6H-SiC samples during annealing up to 1400 °C. Radiation damage dependent grain boundary diffusion is observed at 1300 °C in CVD-SiC. 1 Introduction Modern high-temperature nuclear reactors (HTR’s) commonly use fuel elements containing triple isotropic cladded (TRISO) fuel particles. These are fuel kernels surrounded by four successive lay- ers of low-density pyrolitic carbon, high-density pyrolitic carbon, silicon carbide and high-density pyrolitic carbon, with silicon carbide being the main barrier to prevent the release of fission prod- ucts. -
How Do Radioactive Materials Move Through the Environment to People?
5. How Do Radioactive Materials Move Through the Environment to People? aturally occurring radioactive materials Radionuclides can be removed from the air in Nare present in our environment and in several ways. Particles settle out of the our bodies. We are, therefore, continuously atmosphere if air currents cannot keep them exposed to radiation from radioactive atoms suspended. Rain or snow can also remove (radionuclides). Radionuclides released to them. the environment as a result of human When these particles are removed from the activities add to that exposure. atmosphere, they may land in water, on soil, or Radiation is energy emitted when a on the surfaces of living and non-living things. radionuclide decays. It can affect living tissue The particles may return to the atmosphere by only when the energy is absorbed in that resuspension, which occurs when wind or tissue. Radionuclides can be hazardous to some other natural or human activity living tissue when they are inside an organism generates clouds of dust containing radionu- where radiation released can be immediately clides. absorbed. They may also be hazardous when they are outside of the organism but close ➤ Water enough for some radiation to be absorbed by Radionuclides can come into contact with the tissue. water in several ways. They may be deposited Radionuclides move through the environ- from the air (as described above). They may ment and into the body through many also be released to the water from the ground different pathways. Understanding these through erosion, seepage, or human activities pathways makes it possible to take actions to such as mining or release of radioactive block or avoid exposure to radiation. -
Time, Dose and Fractionation: Accounting for Hypoxia in the Search for Optimal Radiotherapy Treatment Parameters
!"#$ #"%"" &&' ( )(' * % ( + % , , %- .( (, , , % , . . % . %* . , . ( . %- ( . (, , , . . % / , 012( , . % 3 , % / , ( , , ( ( % . % , . ( . % , . + ( . , %%1 % - ( . , . 4 #)-*56 . ( . %1 , . ( + , , . % . , % !"#$ 788 %% 8 9 : 77 7 7 #6);"# <1=>$)>#$$>$";#? <1=>$)>#$$>$";!; ! (#"?># TIME, DOSE AND FRACTIONATION: ACCOUNTING FOR HYPOXIA IN THE SEARCH FOR OPTIMAL RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENT PARAMETERS Emely Kjellsson Lindblom Time, dose and fractionation: accounting for hypoxia in the search for optimal radiotherapy treatment parameters Emely Kjellsson Lindblom ©Emely Kjellsson Lindblom, Stockholm University 2017 ISBN print 978-91-7797-031-6