'Justice in the Premises': Family Violence and the Law in Montreal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

'Justice in the Premises': Family Violence and the Law in Montreal ‘Justice in the Premises’: Family Violence and the Law in Montreal, 1825-1850 Ian C. Pilarczyk McGill University Institute of Comparative Law Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Civil Law © 2003 Ian C. Pilarczyk Abstract The judicial response to family violence in Montreal during the period 1825 to 1850 was marked by paradox and flux. The criminal justice system, driven by private prosecutors, limited the ability of some victims to seek the law’s protection, but it allowed others to exercise considerable discretion and influence over the pursuit of justice. The legal response to the crimes of infanticide, child abuse, domestic violence, and spousal murder was equally contradictory. Infanticide may have been depicted as a horrific crime, but the call for justice was never strong. Western societies became increasingly sensitive to the notion that parents should be held accountable for causing injury to children, but a belief in the sanctity of the family was still paramount. When child abuse cases did come before courts, children were often accorded the same legal remedies by courts as were adult victims. Similarly, while the issue of family violence was not then a widespread societal concern, and while the notion that a wife was subordinate to her husband remained a prominent part of early-Victorian life, hundreds of abused wives prosecuted their husbands for assault. Those cases reflect not only that abused wives were contesting their partner’s use of violence, but also that courts were willing to intervene. Spousal murder cases were further evidence of contradiction: women were subject to heightened legal penalties for killing their partners, but their gender also insulated them from the full severity of the law. In a period before the sweeping public movements that developed in the last several decades of the nineteenth century, courts were forced to grapple with family violence because private prosecutors brought those issues before them. In their willingness to hear cases involving infanticide, child abuse, domestic violence, and spousal murder, courts made public some of Victorian Montreal’s darkest secrets. While the privately- driven system of justice was slowly to erode over the intervening decades, that erosion was to coincide with the rise of public crusades against child-cruelty, domestic violence, and other social issues. The visibility of family violence likely fuelled, and in turn was fuelled by, those social movements. 2 Précis 3 Acknowledgments First and foremost, I am greatly indebted to my thesis supervisor, Blaine Baker. His abiding commitment to scholarship and teaching has been an inspiring example and I am grateful to him for his supervision, mentorship and friendship. Nicholas Kasirer was supportive of this and many other endeavours during my time at the Faculty of Law. They have both had an immense impact on my personal and academic evolution, and for that I offer my heartfelt thanks. I wish to thank Daniel Boyer, Louise Robertson and John Hobbins for their assistance in navigating the Nahum Gelber Law Library’s collections, and for their ongoing interest in my research. I also note with appreciation the support of Deans Stephen Toope and Peter Leuprecht during my doctoral studies, particularly the opportunities to teach they have given me over the past five years. This thesis would not have been possible without the love of family. I am greateful to my parents, who have imparted to me a love of learning as well as an appreciation for the law; and to Andrzej, who has always taken interest and pride in the activities of his little brother. I have never forgotten that the individuals whose stories reside in this work were once living people, struggling to cope with issues that continue to haunt contemporary society. I offer this thesis as a humble tribute to the trials and tribulations they endured. 4 List of Source Abbreviations A.N.Q.M. Archives nationales du Québec à Montréal AP Applications for Pardons CR Coroners’ Inquests JP (township) Returns for Justices of the Peace KB(F) Files of the Court of King’s Bench KB(R) Registers of the Court of King’s Bench MG Records of the Montreal Gaol MG(GC) Gaol Calendars of the Montreal Gaol MP Registers of the Montreal Police Court MP(GR) Records of the Montreal Police, General Register of Prisoners MP(RR)(township) Records of the Montreal Police, Rural Returns N.A.C. National Archives of Canada QS(F) Files of the Court of Quarter Sessions Reid James Reid Papers, Criminal Cases 5 Introduction He did not wear his scarlet coat, For blood and wine are red, And blood and wine were on his hands When they found him with the dead, The poor dead woman whom he loved, And murdered in her bed.1 Oscar Wilde’s 1897 poem, “The Ballad of Reading Gaol,” is a work of poetic paradox that is an apt metaphor for the phenomenon of family violence in nineteenth century Montreal. A poem that depicts the last days of a wife murdered sentenced to death, the account of that “monstrous paricide” nonetheless is a deeply sympathetic account of a man who murdered the woman he loved. Rife with allegory about the dehumanizing effects of incarceration, the hands of inexorable justice appear no less bloody than those of the condemned murderers who were subjected to the law’s ultimate sanction. It is also a deeply unsettling work premised on the notion that “each man kills the thing he loves.” It is strange to think of the person one loves in terms that objectify; it is stranger still to contemplate a love that kills, in whatever manner, the object of its affections. It is perhaps equally strange, but no less accurate, to observe that the family remains one of the most dangerous places in society. One simply cannot study the modern family or its antecedents without also studying domestic violence. This thesis is an attempt to contribute to our awareness of that issue in the nineteenth century 1 Oscar Wilde, The Ballad of Reading Gaol (New York: Brentano’s, 1904). 6 Canadian family, by examining the criminal justice system’s response to family violence in Montreal during the period 1825 to 1850. This work focuses on two family relationships: the parent-child relationship; and the spousal relationship.2 An expansive definition of those relationships has been used, one that takes into account the richness and diversity of personal associations without including those that cannot cogently be included under the rubric of “family.” It does not purport to be an encyclopaedic analysis of the social phenomenon of family violence, nor have I attempted to canvass every conceivable form of legal or quasi-legal response to such conflict. The causes, commonalities, and conclusions of acts of family discord are central of the thesis, but those conclusions were reached through examination of the sources. Essentially, this thesis examines domestic violence as seen through the lens of the law. Nineteenth century domestic violence, in all its forms, has been immortalized in few sources other than judicial archives. As Kathryn Harvey has astutely stated, “[d]omestic violence has evaded the historian partly because it has left few written traces. It has left more marks on the body than the body politic.”3 This thesis seeks to reclaim the legal response to family violence by examining four related areas. Chapter I deals with 2 Only cases in which the marital or family relationship could be substantiated were included. A complicating factor is that married women in Quebec tended to retain their maiden names. Relationships between parties that fit those parameters were included (e.g. people in cognizable parent-guardian relationships, and cohabiting partners). In any event, those types of relationships made up only a minute percentage of the cases examined. 3 Kathryn Harvey, “To love, Honour and Obey’: Wife-Battering in Working-Class Montreal, 1869-1879” (Université de Montréal, Ph.D. Thesis, 1991) 26. 7 violence directed at the youngest of family members, examining the phenomenon of infanticide. Chapter II provides a continuation of that theme, discussing the role of courts in addressing child abuse. Chapter III examines the issue of spousal violence, while Chapter IV considers the most extreme incidents of spousal violence, those culminating in the death of an abused partner.4 To keep the scope of the thesis manageable, it does not address the role of violence in the extended family, nor does it dissect violence directed towards parents by their adult children.5 It should also be emphasized that this is, first and foremost, a study of related forms of social pathology, not a study of nineteenth century relations writ large.6 4 That structure mirrors, in large part, Linda Gordon’s seminal study of nineteenth century family violence in Boston, examining child neglect, child abuse, incest, and wife battering. See generally Linda Gordon, Heroes of Their Own Lives: The Politics and History of Family Violence (New York: Viking Penguin Books, 1988). At a time prior to the formation of “the Cruelty,” the issue of child neglect could not be examined in the same manner. The issue of spousal murder is a logical adjunct to the study of spousal battery, however, and was therefore included in this study. 5 Adult children are only discussed when incidental to cases of spousal violence. 6 As Doggett has noted, such complaints may not have much correlation with marriages in general. See Maeve E. Doggett, Marriage, Wife-Beating and the Law in Victorian England (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1992) 120. See also A. James Hammerton, Cruelty and Companionship, Conflict in Nineteenth-Century Married Life (London & New York: Routledge, 1992) 3: Some will no doubt regard all this an exercise in futility.
Recommended publications
  • Abetment of Suicide Introduction Objectives Of
    [International Journal of Law and Legal Jurisprudence Studies :ISSN:2348-8212:Volume 4 Issue 1] 245 ABETMENT OF SUICIDE Rishabh Shrivastava 1 INTRODUCTION Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code penalizes abetment of suicide. It reads as: “S.306 - Abetment of suicide - If any person commits suicide, whoever abets the commission of such suicide, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term not exceeding ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.” Section 306 prescribes punishment for ‘abetment of suicide’ while section 309 punishes ‘attempt to commit suicide’. Abetment of attempt to commit suicide is outside the purview of section 306 and it is punishable only under section 309 read with section 107, IPC. In certain other jurisdictions, even though attempt to commit suicide is not a penal offence yet the abettor is made punishable. The provision there provides for the punishment of abetment of suicide as well as abetment of attempt to commit suicide. Thus even where the punishment for attempt to commit suicide is not considered desirable, its abetment is made a penal offence. In other words assisted suicide and assisted attempt to commit suicide are made punishable for cogent reasons in the interest of society. Such a provision is considered desirable to also prevent the danger inherent in the absence of such a penal provision. OBJECTIVES OF STUDY The aim of study is to critically analyze the existing laws on abetment of suicide in India and the guidelines issued by Supreme Court of India with respect to different cases. Therefore for going into depth for conducting the research, I decided to carry present research keeping in mind the following objectives: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Not So Firmly Rooted: Exceptions to the Confrontation Clause Stanley A
    NORTH CAROLINA LAW REVIEW Volume 66 | Number 1 Article 7 11-1-1987 Not So Firmly Rooted: Exceptions to the Confrontation Clause Stanley A. Goldman Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Stanley A. Goldman, Not So Firmly Rooted: Exceptions to the Confrontation Clause, 66 N.C. L. Rev. 1 (1987). Available at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol66/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Law Review by an authorized administrator of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOT SO "FIRMLY ROOTED": EXCEPTIONS TO THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE STANLEY A. GOLDMAN t Hearsay statements admitted under a 'firmly rooted" exception may have no inherent guarantees of reliability. Professor Goldman traces the history of the 'firmly rooted" doctrine, discusses its rationale, and reviews its expansion. He analyzes these exceptions under confron- tation clause requirementsand determines they generally lack the requi- site reliability. Professor Goldman concludes the 'firmly rooted" concept is neither useful nor workable, and urges instead that courts adopt a case-by-case examination of hearsay statements' trust- worthiness. I. INTRODUCTION "Flugum done it." Everyone who heard the dying man's last words knew they were spoken "in the hush of [death's] impending presence" and with a settled expectation that death was imminent.' The listeners also knew that Flugum and the deceased had been bitter rivals for years. At the murder trial, Flugum testified in his own defense that at the time of the fatal shooting he had been home asleep.
    [Show full text]
  • La Fleur Du Mal
    Wettbewerb/IFB 2003 LA FLEUR DU MAL LA FLEUR DU MAL THE FLOWER OF EVIL Regie:Claude Chabrol Frankreich 2002 Darsteller Anne Nathalie Baye Länge 104 Min. François Benoît Magimel Format 35 mm, 1:1.66 Tante Line Suzanne Flon Farbe Gérard Bernard Le Coq Michèle Mélanie Doutey Stabliste Matthieu Thomas Chabrol Buch Caroline Eliacheff Fanny Schwiegervater Henri Attal Louise L.Lambrichs Kleiner Junge Kevin Ahyi Claude Chabrol Ehrenamtlicher Helfer Jérôme Bertin Kamera Eduardo Serra Thérèse Françoise Bertin Kameraführung Michel Thiriet Fanny Caroline Baehr Schnitt Monique Fardoulis Brissot Didier Bénureau Ton Pierre Lenoir Yves Pouët Yvon Crenn Thierry Lebon Laborant Jean-Marc Druet Musik Matthieu Chabrol Bürgermeister Michel Herbault Ausstattung Françoise Benoît- Wahlhelfer Edmond Kastelnik Fresco Zweiter Junge Marius de Laage Kostüm Mic Cheminal Reporterin Isabelle Mamère Regieassistenz Cécile Maistre Mélanie Doutey Hélène Juliette Meyniac Produktionsltg. Nathalie Kreuther Jules François Maistre Produzent Marin Karmitz LA FLEUR DU MAL Zweiter Wahlhelfer Jean-Pierre Marin Ausführender Marthe Michèle Dascain Produzent Yvon Crenn Wird Schuld von Generation zu Generation weitervererbt? Welche Folgen Dominique Dominique Pivain Co-Produktion France 3 Cinéma hat ein ungesühntes Verbrechen für den Täter, seine Familie und seine Nachkommen? Am Ende des Zweiten Weltkriegs, als man in Frankreich mit Produktion den Kollaborateuren abrechnet, wird eine Frau von einem Verbrechen frei- MK2 Productions gesprochen, das sie begangen hat. – Chabrols Film beginnt in der Gegen- 55,rue Traversière F-75012 Paris wart,während der heißen Phase einer Kommunalwahl,in deren Verlauf wie- Tel.:1-44 67 30 80 derum ein Verbrechen geschieht. Wer ist schuldig? Derjenige, der die Tat Fax:1-43 41 32 30 begangen hat, oder derjenige, der die Schuld auf sich nimmt? [email protected] Im Mittelpunkt der Handlung stehen die drei noch lebenden Generationen der Familie Charpin-Vasseur, einer Familie aus dem Bürgertum von Borde- Weltvertrieb MK2 aux.
    [Show full text]
  • Dying Declaration of Nicholas Fernandez, Who with Nine Others Were Executed in Front of Cadiz Harbour, Dec, Gg, 18A9
    musBmaMaaaajsiSJ^j* \ A' A A A xt '^ A f ^ /A^AAAAA/ © :0l' « A ^M^f>Mr\> kT*T.TAT^T^T. '^A^. 2p»s« ^AAAAAAAAAA, : LIBRARY OF COMRESS.: UNITED STATES OP AMERICA, {j ^^^M^M\!^'. mf^i 'AAAAA-A, M/^^A, AAMA' .^-.AAAAA^AAnAAAaa^ AAAW/^ „.... ^AAAA^^AAAAoaPO^I^AAA^ jWUJWW '"^-AAA ' :"^^-^-'.^'-^ #*— DYING DSCKARATE OP NICHOLAS FERNANDEZ, Who with Nine others were Executed in front of Cadiz Harbour, December 29, 1829. FOR /^ PIRACY AND MUR CN IHK. HIGH SEAS. Translated from a Spanish copy by FERDINAND BAYER" Annexed is a Solemn Warning to Youth (and other?) to hemie of the baneful habit of INTEMPERANCE. .Price 12 1-2 Cents—1830. Southern District ofNew-TbrA^ s.s. BE IT REMEMBERED, That on the 10th day of May A.D. Eighteen Hundred and Thirty in the 54th year of American Independence of the United States of America, Seorge Lambert, of the said District, hath deposited in this office, the title of a Book.the rjgbtjwhere of he claims as Pro- prietor, in the words following', to wit—" Dying Declaration of Nicholas Fernandez, who with nine others were Executed in front of Cadiz Harbour, Dec, gg, 18a9. for piracy and Murder on the high seas—translated from a Spanish copy by Ferdinand Bayer—annexed is a Solemn Warning to Youth, and others, to beware of the baneful habit of Intemporance-" III conformity to the Act of Congress of the U.States, entitled " an Act for the encouragement of Learning, by securing the copies of Maps, Charts, and Books, k) the authors and proprietors of such copies, during the time therein mentioned." And also to an Act, entitled 'An Act, supplementary to an Act.
    [Show full text]
  • 'I'm Dying to Tell You What Happened': the Admissibility of Testimonial Dying Declarations Post-Crawford
    'I'm Dying to Tell You What Happened': The Admissibility of Testimonial Dying Declarations Post-Crawford by PETER NICOLAS* Introduction Imagine the following scenario: David is shot in the chest by Paula and believes that he is dying. The paramedics arrive, and David says to them, "Before I die... I need to tell you ... that Paula shot me... You... also ... should ...know.., that... Brenda... robbed... First National Bank... last... month." As it turns out, David survives, and Paula and Brenda are indicted, respectively, for attempted murder and bank robbery in separate state court proceedings in Utah. Although David is alive, prosecutors are not able to secure his testimony, either because he refuses to testify or simply cannot be found by prosecutors. Accordingly, they offer the paramedics' testimony about what David said under Utah's hearsay exception for dying declarations, which provides, in relevant part, as follows: The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule if the declarant is unavailable as a witness: (b)(2) Statement under belief of impending death. In a civil or criminal action or proceeding, a statement made by a declarant *Associate Dean and Jeffrey & Susan Brotman Professor of Law, University of Washington School of Law. I wish to thank Melia Cossette, Lori Fossum, Ann Hemmens, Nancy McMurrer, Vickie Northington, Julia Vinson, Jennifer Wertkin, and Mary Whisner of the Gallagher Law Library for their valuable research assistance, as well as Stacy Takekawa of the Dean's Office for her valuable research assistance. I am also indebted to Professors Robert Aronson, Tom Cobb, Thomas Y. Davies, David A.
    [Show full text]
  • Dying Declarations
    ON DYING DECLARATIONS Thomas P. Franczyk Deputy for Legal Education Assigned Counsel Program December 28th, 2020 It has been said that cross examination is “beyond any doubt, the greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth.” (3 Wigmore on Evidence 1367, p.27 [2d Ed 1923], US v Salerno 505 US 317 [1992], Stevens, J., dissenting). This may be so because a skillful cross examiner can expose the flaws in a witness’ perception or memory, reveal his/her biases for or against a party or otherwise challenge his/her credibility by confronting him/her with prior criminal convictions, bad acts or inconsistent statements. The ability to get at the truth of the matter becomes much more difficult, however, when the witness who is the source of damning information (e.g. identifying the defendant as the assailant), cannot testify on account of his/her unavailability due to death. For the past three centuries, English common law and American courts has wrestled with the competing notions of not wanting to let killers go free (after silencing their victims who may have been the only witness to their homicidal conduct), and not convicting innocent people on the last words of a mortally wounded person whose perceptions and motivations can never be explored on the witness stand. An early and oft-cited justification for admitting dying declarations was the idea that the fear of divine retribution would dissuade people from leaving this world for the afterlife with a lie on their lips. Consequently, a dying declaration, while far less preferable to sworn testimony from a live witness, was deemed to have been uttered with the solemnity and seriousness of one who takes the oath.
    [Show full text]
  • Death of Dying Declarations in a Post-Crawford World, The
    Missouri Law Review Volume 71 Issue 2 Spring 2006 Article 1 Spring 2006 Death of Dying Declarations in a Post-Crawford World, The Michael J. Polelle Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael J. Polelle, Death of Dying Declarations in a Post-Crawford World, The, 71 MO. L. REV. (2006) Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol71/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Missouri Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Polelle: Polelle: Death of Dying Declarations MISSOURI LAW REVIEW VOLUME 71 SPRING 2006 NUMBER 2 The Death of Dying Declarations in a Post-Crawford World Michael J. Polelle* "It is revolting to have no better reasonfor a rule of law than that so it was laid down in the time of Henry IV." Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., "The Path of the Law"' "Upon this point a page of history is worth a volume of logic." Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., New York Trust Co. v. Eisner2 I. CRAWFORD V. WASHINGTON As the ambivalence of Justice Holmes reveals, the struggle between logic and historical precedent in the law requires a judicial balance that knows when to yield to the logic of change and when to remain tied to tradi- tion. The landmark case of Crawford v.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Carolina Hearsay Rule and the Uniform Rules of Evidence, 34 N.C
    NORTH CAROLINA LAW REVIEW Volume 34 | Number 3 Article 3 4-1-1956 The orN th Carolina Hearsay Rule and the Uniform Rules of Evidence Leonard S. Powers Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Leonard S. Powers, The North Carolina Hearsay Rule and the Uniform Rules of Evidence, 34 N.C. L. Rev. 294 (1956). Available at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol34/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Law Review by an authorized administrator of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE NORTH CAROLINA HEARSAY RULI, AND THE UNIFORM RULES OF EVIDENCE* LEONARD S. POWERS** Ix HEARSAY OF AN UNAVAILABLE DECLARANT .The hearsay exceptions to be dealt with in this installment are those in which unavailability of the declarant is a requirement. Those covered in the previous installment were those in which unavailability has no bearing. It can be argued that unavailability of the hearsay declarant ought to have nothing to do with the problem of whether hearsay should be admitted in evidence. This argument is that the principal reason for the hearsay rule is the absence of an opportunity for cross-examina- tion, and unavailability of the declarant does not to any extent supplant this test. Unavailability of the hearsay declarant does not contribute to the trustworthiness of his statements uttered out of court. It is true, of course, that his unavailability may supply a compelling motive for admitting the statements, but the original taint coming from lack of cross-examination is not removed nor mitigated by such a considera- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Landmark Judgement of Supreme Court on Dying Declaration
    Landmark Judgement Of Supreme Court On Dying Declaration Mischief-making Daryle sledged, his polymorphs sway intromitted bareknuckle. Is Thornie aired or circumnavigable when demoralised some reel depopulated shudderingly? Sometimes asyntactic Wright bronzes her airwaves hypostatically, but sought Sherwynd rive sparingly or denationalising diabolically. Bhagwan dutt versus state is regarded as dying declaration of supreme court judgement cuts both physical presence of the. The circuit judge properly found the facts and applied the law. The court cannot deny or discard the dying declaration only on the ground of language. The prosecution must lead evidence that the deceased was in fit mental state to make declaration, etc. Manohar Dadarao Landage Vs. That the deceased had clearly stated in the first dying declaration that the second appellant had poured water and extinguished the fire which is a human instinct. RAJA AND OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. Consequently, at least at this early stage of the case. Savita in connection to get into account in the designated court of agreement between minister of what evidentiary value depends upon continued than an appeal on dying declaration of supreme court judgement. The stage is set for a Declaration to be made if Parliament does not take heed! Doctor of the hospital sent information to SHO Police Station Lekhuwali on which investigation started. Disha Ravi was held for sharing a document designed to help ongoing protests against new farming laws. As far as the language of the statement is concerned, dying declarations which are copiously worded or neatly structured excite suspicion for the reason that they bear traces of tutoring.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence--The Opinion Rule As Applicable to Dying Declarations in West Virginia--Another View
    Volume 53 Issue 3 Issues 3 & 4 Article 6 June 1951 Evidence--The Opinion Rule As Applicable to Dying Declarations in West Virginia--Another View J. H. M. Jr. West Virginia University College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr Part of the Evidence Commons Recommended Citation J. H. M. Jr., Evidence--The Opinion Rule As Applicable to Dying Declarations in West Virginia--Another View, 53 W. Va. L. Rev. (1951). Available at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr/vol53/iss3/6 This Student Note is brought to you for free and open access by the WVU College of Law at The Research Repository @ WVU. It has been accepted for inclusion in West Virginia Law Review by an authorized editor of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. M.: Evidence--The Opinion Rule As Applicable to Dying Declarations in West Virginia Law Review Published by the College of Law of West Virginia University. Official publication of The West Virginia Bar Association. STUDENT BOARD OF EDITORS JAMES HENRY MOORE, JR., President William Arthur Beckett William Edward Conklin, Case Editor Thomas Newlon Chambers, Winfred Moten Thompson, Jr. Case Editor Case Editor Marlyn E. Lugar, Faculty Editor in Charge Louise Farrell Conaway, Business Manager STUDENT NOTE EVIDENCE-THE OPINION RULE AS APPLICABLE TO DYING DECLA- RATIONS IN WEST VIRGINIA-ANoTHER VIEw.-The extra-judicial assertions of a deceased person made under the belief of impending death-though hearsay-are admissible in evidence
    [Show full text]
  • ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 159 Motion in Limine
    Pittman v. County of Madison, State of Illinois et al Doc. 162 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS REGINALD PITTMAN, By and through his Guardian and Next Friend, Robin M. Hamilton, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 08-cv-890-SMY-DGW COUNTY OF MADISON, STATE OF ILLINOIS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion in Limine (Doc. 159). The Court heard argument on the Motion on February 4, 2015. For the following reasons, the Court grants in part and denies in part the motion. At the hearing, Plaintiff indicated he had no objection to Motions in Limine Numbers 5 through 15. As such, the Court grants Defendants’ Motions in Limine Numbers 5 – 15. With respect to Motion in Limine Number 5, the Court grants the Motion only with respect to the adequacy of the Madison County Jail’s policies and procedures. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff shall not argue or produce evidence regarding the following subjects: adequacy of Madison County Jail’s policies and procedures (MIL 5); liability of any of the dismissed Defendants (MIL 6); any application for insurance, insurance policy, or statement or testimony concerning whether Defendants may have insurance in connection with Plaintiff’s claim (MIL 7); any indication of the size of the law firm representing Defendants (MIL 8); any reference to settlement negotiations or the lack thereof (MIL 9); the current or former financial status or size of Defendants (MIL 10); any reference to allegations, investigations,
    [Show full text]
  • Dying Declarations Eleanor Dawson University of Kentucky
    Kentucky Law Journal Volume 22 | Issue 2 Article 12 1934 Evidence--Dying Declarations Eleanor Dawson University of Kentucky Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj Part of the Evidence Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Dawson, Eleanor (1934) "Evidence--Dying Declarations," Kentucky Law Journal: Vol. 22 : Iss. 2 , Article 12. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj/vol22/iss2/12 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Law Journal by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT NOTES EViDENcE-DYnTG DEcLARATIoqs.-In a recent Kentucky case, A7- ford v. Commonwealth, 244 Ky. 27, 50 S. W. (2d) 1 (1932), the court held a dying declaration admissable as evidence in a homicide prosecution. The case came before the Court of Appeals for review as to the ad- missibility of certain portions of the declaration. The part relating to the deceased's consciousness of impending death, ". no use to pray, I am too far gone . he shot a deathly shot," was admitted by the court as directly connected with the homicide and relevant to it. The remainder relating to a business difficulty between Alford and the de- ceased some months prior to the shooting was held not to be intimately connected with the shooting and therefore incompetent. Other testi- mony concerning the same subject matter had been admitted without objection, however, and the court ruled that in view of these facts the statement complained of was not sufficiently prejudicial to justify a reversal.
    [Show full text]