DOCSLIB.ORG

Open Letter to the UN Internet Governance Forum (IGF) for Its 3Rd Annual Meeting at Hyderabad, India, from 3Rd to 6Th December, 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Open Letter to the UN Internet Governance Forum (IGF) for Its 3Rd Annual Meeting at Hyderabad, India, from 3Rd to 6Th December, 2008 An Open Letter to the UN Internet Governance Forum (IGF) for its 3rd Annual Meeting at Hyderabad, India, from 3rd to 6th December, 2008 The IGF must ACT NOW against the threat to the public-ness and the egalitarian nature of the Internet Issued on behalf of civil society organisations and individuals list at the end of the open letter The undersigned wish to express their deep concern that the UN Internet Governance Forum (IGF), created by the World Summit on the Information Society in 2005 as an Internet `policy dialogue' forum, is largely failing to address key public interest and policy issues in global Internet governance ± including that of democratic deficit. Who shapes the Internet, as the Internet shapes our new social context? The Internet represents the single most important technical advance of our society in a long time, so much so that it defines a new emerging social paradigm. The basic characteristics of the Internet determine the contours of the emerging social order in many important ways. The Internet was conceived as, and still largely is, an extensive communication system which is democratizing, and has little respect for established social hierarchies. Interactions and associations built over this new `techno-social' system have, therefore, held the promise of a more egalitarian society. The era of innocence of the Internet however appears to be fast approaching its end. Today, the Internet of the future ± the very near future ± is being shaped insidiously by dominant forces to further their interests. (See the fact-sheet on the following page for some illustrations of this.) Unfortunately, global policy forums have largely failed to articulate, much less act on, crucial Internet policy issues, which concern the democratic possibilities for our societies. The IGF needs to act now! As the Internet Governance Forum convenes for its third annual meeting, between 3rd and 6th December, 2008, in Hyderabad, India, it must take immediate steps to anchor and discuss important global public interest and policy issues involved in Internet governance. If it does not act now, it may get seen as a space that only provides an illusion of a public policy dialogue, and, consequently, as being co-opted in furthering the agenda of dominant forces that are shaping the Internet as per their narrow interests. We therefore strongly urge the IGF to directly address the following key global public interest and policy issues: 1. Increasing corporatisation of the Internet 2. Increasing proprietisation of standards and code that go into building the Internet 3. Increasing points of control being embedded into the Internet in the name of security and intellectual property violations 4. Huge democratic deficit in global Internet governance We exhort the IGF to adopt clear directions for engaging with these crucial public policy issues. The IGF should come out with a clear work plan at its forthcoming meeting in Hyderabad to address the four key areas listed above. The global community ± comprising not only people who currently have access to the Internet, but also the un-connected billions who are being impacted by it nevertheless ± will judge the meaningfulness and legitimacy of the IGF in terms of what progress it is able to make on these issues. Alternative Law Forum, Bangalore Centre for Internet and Society, Bangalore Delhi Science Forum, New Delhi Free Software Foundation - India IT for Change, Bangalore Knowledge Commons, New Delhi Information Sheet How the Public-ness and Egalitarian Nature of the Internet is Threatened ± Some Examples Corporatisation of the Internet Largely unsuspected by most of its users, the Internet is rapidly changing from being a vast `public sphere', with a fully public ownership and a non-proprietary nature, to a set of corporatised privately-owned networks. On the one hand, telecom companies are carving out the Internet into privately-owned networks ± controlling the nature of transactions over these networks. They seek to differentially charge content providers, while also building wholly private networks offering exclusive content relay services. Developments like video/TV over Internet Protocol and the provision of controlled and selective Internet services over mobiles are contributing to increasing network-operators' control over the Internet, with a corresponding erosion of its public-ness. On the other hand, the commons of the Internet is also being overwhelmed and squeezed out by a complete domination of a few privately owned mega-applications such as Google, Facebook, Youtube etc. Proprietarisation of standards and code that build the Internet One of the main ways of appropriating the commons of the Internet is through the increasing use of proprietary and closed standards and code in building the Internet system. Such appropriation allows the extortion of illegitimate rent out of the many new forms of commons-based activities that are being made possible through the Internet. Embedding control points in the Internet A growing confluence of corporatist and statist interests has led to the embedding of more and more means of control into the Internet in a manner that greatly compromises citizens' rights and freedoms. Whether it is the pressure on Internet Service Providers to examine Internet traffic for `intellectual property' violations; or imposition of cultural and political controls on the Internet by states within their boundaries; or ITU's work on IP trace-back mechanisms; or the tightening of US control over the global Internet infrastructure in the name of securing the root zone file and the domain name system, these new forms of controlling the Internet are being negotiated among dominant interests away from public scrutiny and wider public interest-based engagements. Democratic deficit in global Internet governance The current global Internet governance regime ± a new-age privatized governance system professing allegiance mostly to a single country, the US ± has proven to be an active instrument of perpetuation of dominant commercial and geo-political interests. Lately, OECD countries have begun some work on developing public policy principles that, due to the inherently global nature of the Internet, can be expected to become globally applicable. It is quite unacceptable that OECD countries shirk from discussing the same public policy issues at global public policy forums like the IGF that they discuss among themselves at OECD meetings. Apparently, developing countries are expected to focus on finding ways to reach connectivity to their people, and not burden themselves with higher-level Internet governance issues! People's and communities' right to self-determination and participation in governance of issues that impact their lives should underpin global Internet governance. Open Letter to IGF Signatories to the letter as of December 02 2008 1. Acorn Active Media Foundaton, USA 2. Agencia Latinoamericana de Información, Ecuador 3. Alternative Law Forum, Bangalore, India 4. Ambedkar Community Computing Center, Bangalore, India 5. Amman Madan, Professor, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India 6. Anand Swaminathan, India 7. Antonio Díaz Andrade, Lecturer, Management and International Business Department, University of Auckland Business School, Auckland, New Zealand 8. Anita Rampal, Professor, Delhi University, Delhi, India 9. Bangladesh NGOs Network for Radio and Communication(BNNRC), Bangladesh 10. BytesforAll India 11. BytesforAll Pakistan 12. CACIM - Indian Institute for Critical Action: Centre in Movement, New Delhi, India 13. Carolina Aguerre, Lecturer & Researcher, Universidad de San Andres, Argentina 14. Cecilia Maria Bacellar Sardenberg, Professor, Diretora do Núcleo de Estudos Interdisciplinares sobre a Mulher, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Brasil 15. Centre African d©Echange Culturel (CAFEC), Democratic Republic of the Congo 16. Centre for Child and the Law, National Law School of India University, Bangalore, India 17. Center for Informal Education and Development Studies (CIEDS), Bangalore, India 18. Centre for Internet and Society, Bangalore, India 19. Chinese Domain Name Users Alliance (CDNUA) 20. Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia (CEMCA), New Delhi, India 21. Comet Media Foundation, India 22. Community Media Trust, India - Chinna Narsamma, Executive Trustee 23. CUWiN Foundation, USA 24. Danny Butt, New Zealand 25. D.Net, Bangladesh 26. Deccan Development Society, India - PV Satheesh, Director 27. Delhi Science Forum, New Delhi, India 28. Environment Support Group, India 29. Foundation for Media Alternatives, Philippines 30. Free Software Foundation, India 31. FreeNetworks.org 32. Fiorello Cortiana, Senator and IGF-Italy, Italy 33. Focus on the Global South, Thailand 34. Frieda Werden, WINGS: Women©s International News Gathering Service, Canada 35. FSUG Bangalore, India 36. Hengasara Hakkina Sangha, Bangalore, India 37. Gora Mohanty, Research Fellow, Sarai, Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, India 38. Graciela Selaime, Red de Información para el Tercer Sector (RITS), Brazil 39. Human Rights Coalition of South Australia, Australia 40. Imaginons un Réseau Internet Solidaire (IRIS), France 41. IP Justice, USA 42. ISIS International ± Manila, Philippines 43. Isis Women©s International Cross Cultural Exchange (Isis-WICCE), Uganda 44. Institute of Social Studies, New Delhi, India 45. Instituto del Tercer Mundo (ITeM), Urugay 46. Institute for Human Development, New Delhi, India 47. IT for Change, Bangalore, India 48. Jaijit Bhattacharya,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Global Information Society Watch 2008
    GLOBAL INFORMATION SOCIETY WATCH 2008 is the second in a series of yearly reports critically covering the state of the information society from 2008 2008 GLOBAL INFORMATION the perspectives of civil society organisations across the world. GLOBAL INFORMATION SOCIETY WATCH or GISWatch has three interrelated SOCIETY WATCH 2008 goals: • Surveying the state of information and communication technology (ICT) Focus on access to infrastructure ETY WATCH policy at the local and global levels ETY WATCH I I • Encouraging critical debate • Strengthening networking and advocacy for a just, inclusive information society. ON SOC ON SOC I I Each year the report focuses on a particular theme. GISWatch 2008 focuses on access to infrastructure and includes several thematic reports dealing with key access issues, an analysis of where global institutions stand on the access debate, a report looking at the state of indicators and access, six regional reports and 38 country reports. GISWatch 2008 is a joint initiative of the Association for Progressive Communications (APC), the Humanist Institute for Cooperation with GLOBAL INFORMAT Developing Countries (Hivos) and the Third World Institute (ITeM). GLOBAL INFORMAT GLOBAL INFORMATION SOCIETY WATCH 2008 Report www.GISWatch.org 9659 04 295 ISBN 92-95049-65-9 789 9 ASSOCI A TION FOR PROGRESSIVE COMMUNIC A TIONS (APC), HIVOS A ND T H E TH IRD WORLD INSTITUTE (ITeM) Global Information Society Watch 2008 Global Information Society Watch 2008 Steering committee Karen Banks (APC) Roberto Bissio (ITeM) Anriette Esterhuysen
    [Show full text]
  • Global Digital Cultures: Perspectives from South Asia
    Revised Pages Global Digital Cultures Revised Pages Revised Pages Global Digital Cultures Perspectives from South Asia ASWIN PUNATHAMBEKAR AND SRIRAM MOHAN, EDITORS UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN PRESS • ANN ARBOR Revised Pages Copyright © 2019 by Aswin Punathambekar and Sriram Mohan All rights reserved This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publisher. Published in the United States of America by the University of Michigan Press Manufactured in the United States of America Printed on acid- free paper First published June 2019 A CIP catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication data has been applied for. ISBN: 978- 0- 472- 13140- 2 (Hardcover : alk paper) ISBN: 978- 0- 472- 12531- 9 (ebook) Revised Pages Acknowledgments The idea for this book emerged from conversations that took place among some of the authors at a conference on “Digital South Asia” at the Univer- sity of Michigan’s Center for South Asian Studies. At the conference, there was a collective recognition of the unfolding impact of digitalization on various aspects of social, cultural, and political life in South Asia. We had a keen sense of how much things had changed in the South Asian mediascape since the introduction of cable and satellite television in the late 1980s and early 1990s. We were also aware of the growing interest in media studies within South Asian studies, and hoped that the conference would resonate with scholars from various disciplines across the humanities and social sci- ences.
    [Show full text]
  • South Asia.Pdf
    GLOBAL INFORMATION SOCIETY WATCH (GISWatch) 2009 is the third in a series of yearly reports critically covering the state of the information society 2009 2009 GLOBAL INFORMATION from the perspectives of civil society organisations across the world. GISWatch has three interrelated goals: SOCIETY WATCH 2009 • Surveying the state of the field of information and communications Y WATCH technology (ICT) policy at the local and global levels Y WATCH Focus on access to online information and knowledge ET ET – advancing human rights and democracy I • Encouraging critical debate I • Strengthening networking and advocacy for a just, inclusive information SOC society. SOC ON ON I I Each year the report focuses on a particular theme. GISWatch 2009 focuses on access to online information and knowledge – advancing human rights and democracy. It includes several thematic reports dealing with key issues in the field, as well as an institutional overview and a reflection on indicators that track access to information and knowledge. There is also an innovative section on visual mapping of global rights and political crises. In addition, 48 country reports analyse the status of access to online information and knowledge in countries as diverse as the Democratic Republic of Congo, GLOBAL INFORMAT Mexico, Switzerland and Kazakhstan, while six regional overviews offer a bird’s GLOBAL INFORMAT eye perspective on regional trends. GISWatch is a joint initiative of the Association for Progressive Communications (APC) and the Humanist Institute for Cooperation with
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Landscape Report Final
    PAKISTAN'S INTERNET LANDSCAPE 2018 A REPORTC BY BYTES FOR ALL, PAKISTAN Author: Jahanzaib Haque ([email protected]) Research Assistant: ShahBano Ali Khan Design: Alyna Butt ([email protected]) C 03 TABLE OF CONTENTS 06 INTERNET ACCESS 15 GOVERNANCE AND CRIME 23 BLASPHEMY 30 CHILD PORNOGRAPHY 36 CYBERCRIME 40 DATA PROTECTION AND PRIVACY 45 CENSORSHIP AND MEDIA 52 GENERAL ELECTIONS 58 FAKE NEWS 66 FIN-TECH AND BRANCHLESS BANKING C 73 E-COMMERCE GG PREFACE 04 PREFACE The fourth edition of “Internet Landscape of Pakistan” is an exhaustive mapping of the digital trends that not only impact citizens’ social, economic and political rights, but also determines how responsive and ecient the government is in addressing peoples’ problems. This report, we hope, would be useful for media professionals, policy makers, civil society, academia, UN special mandate holders and International development partners. The report comes at a time when Pakistan, like many other countries in Asia specifically, is witnessing a tense struggle between a vibrant civil society and an oppressive, coercive and controlling polity. Over the year, since the last edition of this report was published, Pakistan has faced far greater control over free expression, increased censorship, secrecy of public policy decision-making, and violation of fundamental freedoms of citizens. It is noteworthy that since 2013, when the first edition of Internet Landscape of Pakistan came out, the usage of internet by the state and citizenry has increased manifold. Almost all organs of the state are visibly more concerned about what is said on the internet about them and of the services they deliver to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Increasing Poor Communities Access to IT and Telecommunications in India
    DIGITAL PARTNERS INSTITUTE Background Paper to the Consultation with Outcomes and Suggestions Increasing Poor Communities’ Access to IT and Telecommunications in India – How e-ready is India? Consultation New Delhi, November 27-29, 2001 Supported by USAID-India 1 Prepared By Digital Partners http://www.digitalpartners.org/telecom_consultation.html 1 Paper written by: Peter Cowhey, Professor University of California, San Diego, Joyojeet Pal, University of California, Berkeley and Akhtar Badshah, Digital Partners 1 Increasing Poor Communities’ Access to IT and Telecommunications in India – How e-ready is India? Introduction Development experts, non-governmental organizations, foundations and people of all strata are looking at IT as having potential to accelerate development and bring the benefits of the knowledge-based economy to the poor. However, the extent to which we can use Telecommunications and Information Technology to accelerate development and bring direct economic benefit to the people will depend on the policies we promote and the infrastructure we put in place—both at the backbone and hardware level. A consultation to address these issues was conducted with support from USAID-India that brought together experts from the government, business, academia and non-profit organizations to together address the question how communications and information technology policies work together to increase the access to telecommunications and information technology (IT) by peri-urban, rural and other under-served populations? This paper provides the reader background on what some of the current issues dealing with policy are, including universal services, provision/pricing, spectrum allocation/availability of broadband, and interconnection issues and provides the outcome of the consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • “Right to Information: the Road Ahead”
    National Convention on “Right to Information: The Road Ahead” Organised by Media Information and Communication Centre of India (MICCI) and Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (FES), In collaboration with The International Centre, Goa (ICG) SPEAKERS’ PROFILE Anshika Mishra, Senior Correspondent, DNA – Mumbai. Prof. Abdur Rahim is one of the senior-most journalism and mass communication educationists in India. Having retired from India’s prestigious journalism school at Osmania University, Hyderabad after 35 years of service as Chairman and Dean, he is presently serving as Visiting Professor at the Moulana Azad National Urdu University, Hyderabad. He is a Visiting Faculty for many Journalism and Mass Communication Departments all over the country. Widely traveled, he has lectured at the famous Columbia School of Journalism, at Harvard School of Government and Oxford University. He has participated in many international media conferences and addressed Seminars. An author of several books on media, he has contributed hundreds of articles in research journals, newspapers, both in India and abroad, and magazines. His areas of specialization are media theory and research, media ethics, and development communication. He is presently the Vice-President of the Commonwealth Association for Education in Communication and Journalism (CAEJAC) and the Secretary of the South Asian Media Association (SAMA) and Chairman of Bharat Samachar. He is also Chapter Head of MICCI (Andhra Pradesh). Email - [email protected] Dr. I. Arul Aram , PhD, is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Media Sciences, Anna University, Chennai, India. He is formerly a Chief Sub-Editor with The Hindu newspaper. He had also served as the President of the Madras Press Club.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Internet Shutdowns: a Case Study from Pakistan
    International Journal of Communication 12(2018), 3917–3938 1932–8036/20180005 Understanding Internet Shutdowns: A Case Study from Pakistan BEN WAGNER1 Vienna University of Economics and Business, Austria This article provides an overview of Internet shutdowns in Pakistan, which have become an increasingly common phenomenon, with 41 occurring between 2012 and 2017. It argues that to understand how shutdowns became normalized in Pakistan, it is necessary to look at the specific dynamics of how the shutdowns take place. In doing so, the concept of communicative ruptures develops to better understand intentional government shutdowns of communications. The article argues that strategic prevention of mobilization is key for short-term shutdowns, whereas long-term shutdowns can be better explained by looking at disciplinary mechanisms and denying the existence of “others.” The article then discusses Internet shutdowns in the wider context of authoritarian practices before concluding with the urgent need for further research on this topic, both in Pakistan and beyond. Keywords: Internet shutdowns, human rights, telecommunications policy, Internet access, technology regulation, authoritarian politics On August 14, 2014, the “Interior Ministry . ordered mobile phone services to be shut down in several parts of Islamabad for an indefinite period” (Bhatti, 2014, para. 1). For three days, large parts of the Pakistani capital were disconnected from mobile phone voice and data connectivity. Citizens in these areas were not able to use their phones, not able to access mobile Internet (by far the most common form of Internet connectivity in Pakistan), and were not able to call emergency services. Why would a government suppress all digital communications across a whole city for days on end? The five-day telecommunications and Internet services shutdown in Egypt in 2011 cost Egypt’s economy at least US$90 million, excluding secondary costs, as well as its “reputation among technology firms as a stable place for investment” (Howard, Agarwal, & Hussain, 2011b, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Icts in Rural Areas (India) Phase II – Information Village Research Project
    Impact of ICTs in Rural Areas (India) Phase II – Information Village Research Project supported by International Development Research Centre (IDRC), Canada Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), Canada implemented by M S Swaminathan Research Foundation (MSSRF) Terminal Report [2000-2004] Introduction As momentum builds up around the globe for debating and directing the future of ICTs in society, a key concern that cannot be ignored is the fate of the world’s villages, especially in developing countries, where most of the human population lives. What are some notable success stories on this front? What has been their guiding vision and evolving infrastructure? How can these lessons be captured, exchanged and multiplied? This terminal report is an attempt to tell the story of the Rural Knowledge Centres [RKCs], its human face, evolutionary path, future directions, trials and tribulations. It is a work in progress, and will undoubtedly evolve as the story of this bold and inspiring human adventure unfolds. How has ICT-blended development impacted the lives of the rural poor? Can such experiments survive after seed donor funding has dried up? What knowledge assets can be created, exchanged and leveraged by rural communities? Why are such knowledge-intensive experiments so few in number around the world? How can policymakers and local community stakeholders sustain this experiment? This terminal report attempts to address a wide range of these critical issues. Genesis Technological divide has been an important factor in enlarging the rich-poor divide both among and within nations since the onset of the Industrial Revolution in Europe. With explosive progress in many areas of technology, like information, space, bio- and nano-technology, this divide is increasing.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Flood Control in Eastern South Asia
    CHAPTER 17 AN ANALYSIS OF FLOOD CONTROL IN EASTERN SOUTH ASIA AMARTYA KUMAR BHATTACHARYA Chairman and Managing Director, MultiSpectra Consultants, 23, Biplabi Ambika Chakraborty Sarani, Kolkata – 700029, West Bengal, India, E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT This chapter studies the causes and features of floods and measures for the control of floods in eastern India and Bangladesh. Structural as well as non-structural measures are being emphasized for flood management in both India and Bangladesh. It has been proved that non-structural measures have a significant effect on flood damage minimization. 17.1 INTRODUCTION The northeastern region of India comprises seven states, namely Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Manipur, Nagaland, Tripura, and Arunachal Pradesh and the region borders the countries of Bhutan, China, Bangladesh, and Myanmar. The entire region is one of the most hazard-prone regions in the Asian continent, with different areas being prone to multi-hazards like earthquakes, floods, landslides, and cyclonic storms. The rivers Brahma- putra and Barak drain the region. The Brahmaputra river has a catchment area of 5,80,000 km in Tibet, Bhutan, India, and Bangladesh and in terms of discharge is the third largest river in the world, in terms of sediment load it is second after the Hwang-Ho river of China. The river flows for a length of 918 km in India of which 720 km is in through the plains of Assam. In this valley, about 20 major tributaries on its North bank and about 13 on its South Bank join the river Brahmaputra. The precipitation here is mainly due 202 Wastewater Reuse and Watershed Management to the South-West monsoon.
    [Show full text]
  • Suggestions for Internet-Related Human Rights Questions to Be Included in the List of Issues on Pakistan, Human Rights Committee 120Th Session, June-July 2017
    Suggestions for internet-related human rights questions to be included in the list of issues on Pakistan, Human Rights Committee 120th session, June-July 2017 Association for Progressive Communications, Bytes for All Pakistan, and Media Matters for Democracy August 2016 Table of contents 1. Introduction...............................................................................................................3 2. Article 17: Right to privacy.......................................................................................... 3 2.1. Inadequate safeguards to protect the right to privacy of correspondence......................3 2.2. Domestic surveillance............................................................................................ 4 2.3. Foreign surveillance............................................................................................... 5 3. Article 18: Freedom of religion or belief.........................................................................6 3.1. Religious freedoms under attack..............................................................................6 3.2. Freedom of religion desecrated online...................................................................... 7 4. Article 19: Freedom of opinion and expression............................................................... 8 4.1. Disproportionate restrictions to freedom of expression online......................................9 4.2. Attacks on journalists and bloggers: A deadly threat to freedom of expression............10 5. Articles
    [Show full text]
  • The State of the Art of the Digital Divide
    Contact Person: Teresa Peters, Executive Director [email protected] South Africa: P.O. Box 4163, Durbanville 7551 +27 21 970 1304 United States: 2000 P St NW Ste 240, Washington DC +1 202 776 0120 URL: www.bridges.org Table of Contents Table of Contents....................................................................................................................................2 Executive Summary................................................................................................................................3 1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................10 1.1 The fervour about the digital divide ....................................................................................10 1.2 What is the real problem?....................................................................................................10 1.3 Why another report on the digital divide? ...........................................................................11 1.4 Our Suggestions For What Is Needed .................................................................................11 2 International and Domestic Digital Divides.................................................................................13 2.1 What Are We Measuring? ...................................................................................................15 2.2 Disparities in ICT Use Between Countries – the International Divide...............................17 2.3 Disparities
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Information Technology Solutions in Indian Languages: Pros and Cons
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by E-LIS Developing Information Technology Solutions in Indian Languages: Pros and Cons Madhuresh Singhal T S Prasanna Aurigene Discovery Technologies Ltd. Intel Technologies India Ltd. Electronic city, Bangalore- 562158 Bangalore [email protected] [email protected] Sharad Kumar Sonker S Shashinath Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Science National Centre for Science Information IV T Block, Jayanagar, Bangalore IISc, Bangalore - 560012 [email protected] [email protected] Abstract A very large part of the content in our country is in various local languages. Language is a barrier to get the full advantage of this knowledge. In order to remove the language barrier, computer and IT solutions can play a major role. It is needed to create a system of multilingual content knowledge base so that it can serve all-regional community requirements. However this is not an easy task as there are various technological hurdles and lack of commitment. Commercial companies are not interested in developing such solutions, as there is no such big market in doing that. This paper gives an insight about developing the local language solutions and it’s pros and cons. It also discusses about the initiatives taken by the government and its supported organisatons. 1.1 Introduction The Indian Constitution mentions 18 languages as languages of India. Each language has its own literature, comprising great novels, drama and poetry. It is indeed these differences that make India an interesting country. India has over 1683 languages and dialects and an estimated 850 languages in daily use.
    [Show full text]