Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and Investment." Pindyck, Robert S
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Published as: “Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and Investment." Pindyck, Robert S. Journal of Economic Literature Vol. 29, No. 3 (1991): 1110-1148. Copyright & Permissions Copyright © 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 by the American Economic Association. Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of American Economic Association publications for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not distributed for profit or direct commercial advantage and that copies show this notice on the first page or initial screen of a display along with the full citation, including the name of the author. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than AEA must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. The author has the right to republish, post on servers, redistribute to lists and use any component of this work in other works. For others to do so requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Permissions may be requested from the American Economic Association Administrative Office by going to the Contact Us form and choosing "Copyright/ Permissions Request" from the menu. Copyright © 2018 AEA Journal of Economic Literature Vol. XXIX (September 1991), pp. 1110-1148 Irreversibility,Uncertainty, and Investment By ROBERT S. PINDYCK MassachusettsInstitute of Technology My thanks to Prabhat Mehtafor his research assistance, and to Ben Bernanke, Vittorio Corbo, Nalin Kulatilaka,Robert McDonald, Louis Serven, Andreas Solimano, and two anonymous referees for helpful commentsand suggestions. Financial support was provided by MIT's Center for Energy Policy Research, by the World Bank, and by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. SES-8618502. Any errors are mine alone. I. Introduction ment expenditure can profoundly affect the decision to invest. It also undermines DESPITE ITS IMPORTANCE to economic the theoretical foundation of standard growth and market structure, the neoclassical investment models, and in- investment behavior of firms, industries, validates the net present value rule as and countries remains poorly under- it is usually taught to students in business stood. Econometric models have had school: "Invest in a project when the limited success in explaining and predict- present value of its expected cash flows ing changes in investment spending, and is at least as large as its cost." This rule we lack a clear explanation of why some and models based on it-are incorrect countries or industries invest more than when investments are irreversible and others. decisions to invest can be postponed. One problem with existing models is Irreversibility may have important im- that they ignore two important character- plications for our understanding of aggre- istics of most investment expenditures. gate investment behavior. It makes in- First, the expenditures are largely irre- vestment especially sensitive to various versible; that is, they are mostly sunk forms of risk, such as uncertainty over costs that cannot be recovered. Second, the future product prices and operating the investments can be delayed, giving costs that determine cash flows, uncer- the firm an opportunity to wait for new tainty over future interest rates, and un- information to arrive about prices, costs, certainty over the cost and timing of the and other market conditions before it investment itself. Irreversibility may commits resources. therefore have implications for macro- As an emerging literature has shown, economic policy; if a goal is to stimu- the ability to delay an irreversible invest- late investment, stability and credibility 1110 This content downloaded from 18.7.29.240 on Wed, 5 Nov 2014 09:36:58 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Pindyck: Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and Investment 1111 could be much more important than tax tential competitors. (Richard Gilbert incentives or interest rates. 1989 surveys the literature on strategic What makes an investment expendi- aspects of investment.) But in most cases, ture a sunk cost and thus irreversible? delay is at least feasible. There may be Usually it is the fact that the capital is a cost to delay-the risk of entry by other firm or industry specific, that is, it cannot firms, or simply foregone cash flows-but be used productively by a different firm this cost must be weighed against the or in a different industry. For example, benefits of waiting for new information. most investments in marketing and ad- An irreversible investment opportu- vertising are firm specific, and hence are nity is much like a financial call option. clearly sunk costs. A steel plant is indus- A call option gives the holder the right, try specific-it can only be used to pro- for some specified amount of time, to pay duce steel. Although in principle the an exercise price and in return receive plant could be sold to another steel com- an asset (e.g., a share of stock) that has pany, its cost should be viewed as mostly some value. Exercising the option is ir- sunk, particularly if the industry is com- reversible; although the asset can be sold petitive. The reason is that the value of to another investor, one cannot retrieve the plant will be about the same for all the option or the money that was paid firms in the industry, so there is likely to exercise it. A firm with an investment to be little gained from selling it. (If the opportunity likewise has the option to price of steel falls so that a plant turns spend money (the "exercise price") now out, ex post, to have been a "bad"invest- or in the future, in return for an asset ment, it will also be viewed as a bad in- (e.g., a project) of some value. Again, vestment by other steel companies, so the asset can be sold to another firm, that the ability to sell the plant will not but the investment is irreversible. As be worth much.) with the financial call option, this option Even investments that are not firm or to invest is valuable in part because the industry specific are often partly irre- future value of the asset obtained by in- versible because of the "lemons" prob- vesting is uncertain. If the asset rises in lem. For example, office equipment, value, the net payoff from investing rises. cars, trucks, and computers are not in- If it falls in value, the firm need not in- dustry specific, but have resale value well vest, and will only lose what it spent to below their purchase cost, even if new. obtain the investment opportunity. Irreversibility can also arise because of How do firms obtain investment op- government regulations or institutional portunities? Sometimes they result from arrangements. For example, capital con- patents, or ownership of land or natural trols may make it impossible for foreign resources. More generally, they arise (or domestic) investors to sell assets and from a firm's managerial resources, tech- reallocate their funds. And investments nological knowledge, reputation, market in new workers may be partly irreversible position, and possible scale, all of which because of high costs of hiring, train- may have been built up over time, and ing, and firing. which enable the firm to productively un- Firms do not always have an opportu- dertake investments that individuals or nity to delay investments. For example, other firms cannot undertake. Most im- there can be occasions in which strategic portant, these options to invest are valu- considerations make it imperative for a able. Indeed, for most firms, a substantial firm to invest quickly and thereby part of their market value is attributable preempt investment by existing or po- to their options to invest and grow in This content downloaded from 18.7.29.240 on Wed, 5 Nov 2014 09:36:58 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 1112 Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXIX (September 1991) the future, as opposed to the capital they This paper has several objectives. already have in place. (For discussions First, I will review some basic models of growth options as sources of firm of irreversible investment to illustrate value, see Stewart Myers 1977; W. Carl the option-like characteristics of invest- Kester 1984; and my 1988 article.) ment opportunities, and to show how op- When a firm makes an irreversible in- timal investment rules can be obtained vestment expenditure, it exercises, or from methods of option pricing, or alter- "kills," its option to invest. It gives up natively from dynamic programming. Be- the possibility of waiting for new informa- sides demonstrating a methodology that tion to arrive that might affect the desir- can be used to solve a class of investment ability or timing of the expenditure; it problems, this will show how the result- cannot disinvest should market condi- ing investment rules depend on various tions change adversely. This lost option parameters that come from the market value is an opportunity cost that must environment. be included as part of the cost of the A second objective is to survey briefly investment. As a result, the NPV rule some recent applications of this method- "Invest when the value of a unit of capital ology to a variety of investment prob- is at least as large as its purchase and lems, and to the analysis of firm and in- installation cost" must be modified. The dustry behavior. Examples will include value of the unit must exceed the pur- the effects of sunk costs of entry, exit, chase and installation cost, by an amount and temporary shutdowns and restartups equal to the value of keeping the invest- on investment and output decisions, the ment option alive. implications of construction time (and the Recent studies have shown that this option to abandon construction) for the opportunity cost of investing can be value of a project, and the determinants large, and investment rules that ignore of a firm's choice of capacity.