DOCSLIB.ORG

P,C, and T SYMMETRIES Project for Advanced Selected Problems in Physics Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Namık Kemal Pak Student: İ. Ufuk

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
P,C, and T SYMMETRIES Project for Advanced Selected Problems in Physics Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Namık Kemal Pak Student: İ. Ufuk P,C, and T SYMMETRIES Project for Advanced Selected Problems in Physics Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Namık Kemal Pak Student: İ. UfukTaşdan 1 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Classical Treatments of Discrete Symmetries 2.1 Parity 2.2 Charge Conjugation 2.3 Time Reversal 3. Relativistic Treatments of Discrete Symmetries 3.1 Parity 3.2 Charge Conjugation 3.3 Time Reversal 3.4 PCT 4. PaisUhlenbeck Oscillator and PCT 5. Conclusion 2 1. Classical Treatments of Discrete Symmetries It is proven by Noether’s first theorem that every continuous symmetry in nature corresponds to some conservation law[3]. For example, since little push on position vector will not change the motion of physical system, there exist some constant which we call momentum is a constant of motion. However, it is not investigated that what would happen, for example, inversing the position vector, although reversing position does not change motion of physical system. Does it give the new conservation laws, or is it just a generalization of Noether’s first theorem? 2.1 Parity The first discrete symmetry that we will cover is space inversion or parity. The parity operation, as applied to transformation on the coordinate system, changes a right handed(RH) system into a left handed(LH) system. In other words, take the mirror image (and turn by 180 in its axis) of a physical motion, say with recorder. The unbiased viewer(that is new born baby, or a man without common sense, but knowing the laws of nature) of this recorded film will not understand whether it is a mirror image or not. Since we are dealing with quantum mechanics, we work with state kets. How does an eigenket of the position operator transform under parity ? We claim that ⟩ ⟩ 3 Where is a phase factor and is real. Let us take (since it is insensitive in expectation value of any operator), and subsituting this in (2.1) we have ⟩ ⟩ ; thus , that is we come back to same state by appliying parity operator twice, and actually we want this due to our common sense, that is if we turn one rigid object to its backward, it eventually come to same position. We easily see that from (2.1) is not only unitary but also hermitian, Its eigenvalue can be only +1 or -1. Consider a space inverted state, assumed to be obtained by applying a unitary operator known as the parity operator, as follows: ⟩ ⟩ We require the expectation value of x taken with respect to the space inverted state to be opposite in sign. ⟨ | | ⟩ ⟨ ⟩ A very reasonable requirement. This is accomplished if Or 4 Where we have used the fact that is unitary. In other words, x and must anticommute. Therefore, every derivative of position with respect to time, i.e. velocity, acceleration etc., will anticommute with . We should note that, ⟩ ⟩ ⟩ It states that ⟩ is an eigenket of x with eigenvalue –x’, so it must be the same as position eigenket ⟩ up to a phase factor. Let us consider the momentum operator, since it is mdx/dt in classical manner, it is natural to expect to be odd under parity. Let consider momentum operator as the generator of translation. Since translation followed by parity is equivalent to parity followed translation in the opposite direction, then, Where is unitary translation operator and it differ from identity operator with where G is the hermitian generation operator, here we use p as G . Therefore, ( ) From which follows { } 5 Finally we will consider wave functions under parity transformations. Firstly be a wavefunction of a spinless particle whose state is ⟩; ⟨ ⟩ The wave function of space inverted state, represented by the state ket ⟩ is ⟨ ⟩ ⟨ ⟩ To continue let ⟩is an eigenket of parity. Also, since eigenvalue of parity should be therefore, ⟩ ⟩ The corresponding wave function will be, ⟨ ⟩ ⟨ ⟩ ⟨ ⟩ Since parity inverted state will always take the value +1, whereas unperturbed state eigenvalue depend the wavefunction, therefore ⟩ state is even or odd under parity However, not all wavefunctions of physical interest with parity, for example in a plane wave which have momentum operator in it, is not expected to be parity eigenket since momentum operator anticommutes with parity operator. 6 2.2 Charge Conjugation Classical electrodynamics is unvarying under a change in the sign of all electric charges ; the potentials and fields reverse their signs, but there is a compensating charge factor in the Lorentz law, so the forces still come out the same, for instance However the lorentz force, [ ] [ ] [ ] As a conventional example, consider a charge moving uniformly in a magnetic field than, suppose we change sign of every particle’s charge suddenly, will it be go opposite direction? No, since we change the both magnetic field creating particle’s and spectator’s charge there will be no difference in orbit, or deviation. Thus, we call ‘changing the sign of the charge’ as charge conjugation, C, and it converts each particle into its antiparticle: ⟩ ̅⟩ When we state the ‘charge conjugation’ we do not mean to only its electric charge, for C can be applied to a neutral particle, such as the neutron (yielding an antineutron), and it changes the sign of all the ‘internal’ quantum numbers - 7 charge, baryon number, lepton number, strangeness, charm, beauty, truth – while leaving mass, energy, momentum, and spin untouched. As with parity, application of C twice brings us back to the original state: And hence the eigenvalues of C are . If ⟩ is an eigenstate of C, it follows that, ⟩ ⟩ ̅⟩ So ⟩ and ̅⟩ differ at most by a sign, which means that they represent the same physical state. Thus, only those particles that are their own antiparticles can be eigenstate of C. This leaves us the photon, as well as all those mesons that lie at the center of their Eightfold-Way diagrams: and so on. Note that electromagnetic fields are produced by moving charges that change sign under C, also charge conjugation quantum number is multiplicative, a system of n photons has C eigenvalue (-1)n . For instance, the neutral pion undergoes the decay And thus has even C-parity , ⟩ ⟩ It follows that neutral pion cannot decay an odd number of photons. 8 On the other hand, charge conjugation is not a symmetry of the weak interactions: when applied to a neutrino C gives a left handed antineutrino, which does not occur.[5] 9 2.2 Time Reversal What we mean by time reversal is not the objects that come from future, but it is the reversal of motion. In other words, record some physical event and let some unbiased viewer watch this film backward will not understand whether the physical event is foreward or backward. Therefore it should be a symmetry of nature that we should cover. Since we do not reverse its position, x will remain same under time reversal, however its derivatives will not, let be time reversal operator, Therefore, velocity will take minus sign under time reversal, thus, every element that have velocity part is odd under time reversal. For example, let apply this time reversal operation on electromagnetism, the new field will be; This states that Lorentz Force [ ( ) ]is invariant under time reversal, and Maxwell Equations under time reversal would be ; is also invariant under time reversal. Let us more concentrated on time reversal operator , let ⟩ is an eigenket of , than, 10 ⟩ ⟩ Where ⟩ is time reversed state, or to be more clear it is motion reversed state. For instance if ⟩ is a momentum eigenstate we expect ⟩ to be equal to ⟩ to a phase factor. Now, let consider this eigenket ⟩ at t=0 , then a slightly later time , the system would be in, ⟩ ( ) ⟩ Where H is the governing hamiltonian evolving time. Before going too further, let apply time reversal operator first at t=0, and then let system evolve under the influence of the Hamiltonian H. We than have at , ( ) ⟩ Since we expect that the preceding state ket to be same as ⟩ That is first consider a state ket at earlier time t=- , and reverse the other parts of eigenket. Mathematically , ( ) ⟩ ( ) ⟩ If it is true for any ket, than, 11 ⟩ ⟩ We know argue that cannot be unitary unless the motion of time reversal is to make sense. Otherwise, suppose to be unitary, than cancel the i’s in (2.43) so that we have, Consider an energy eigenket ⟩ with energy eigenvalue of En. The corresponding time reversed state would be ⟩ , and we would have, ⟩ ⟩ ⟩ Since it has negative energy value, in other words it states that our free time reversed particle has an energy spectrum of - to 0 which is completely unacceptable. What should we do now? Will we choose to keep going with unphysical relations or improve new mathematical device to get rid of this negative value. For now, let choose latter, because imaginary valued velocities are both unphysical and extraordinary for common sense. Let A be an operator such that, ⟩ ̌⟩ ⟩ ⟩ ̌⟩ ⟩ And if ⟨ ̌| ̌⟩ ⟨ ⟩ 12 There relations hold, A said to be antiunitary, that is being both unitary and complex conjugate operators in it, Where U is a unitary operator and K is the coplex conjugate operator that forms the the complex conjugate of any coefficient that multiplies a ket and stand on the right of K. Also if A satisfies the relation of, ⟩ ⟩ ⟩ ⟩ İs said to be antilinear operator. However let more concentrated on K (since it should solve our negative energy value problem). Suppose we have a ket multiplied with some constant c, ⟩ ⟩ Let move on to physical discussion, we have antiunitary operator of time reversal, that solve negative energy problem so that, Which gives positive energy value. 13 Relativistic Treatments of Discrete Symmetries We have seen the classical treatments of discrete symmetries to understand how to deal with symmetries in the classical quantum mechanics and classical mechanics.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rotation and Spin and Position Operators in Relativistic Gravity and Quantum Electrodynamics
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 4 December 2019 doi:10.20944/preprints201912.0044.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Universe 2020, 6, 24; doi:10.3390/universe6020024 1 Review 2 Rotation and Spin and Position Operators in 3 Relativistic Gravity and Quantum Electrodynamics 4 R.F. O’Connell 5 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University; Baton Rouge, LA 70803-4001, USA 6 Correspondence: [email protected]; 225-578-6848 7 Abstract: First, we examine how spin is treated in special relativity and the necessity of introducing 8 spin supplementary conditions (SSC) and how they are related to the choice of a center-of-mass of a 9 spinning particle. Next, we discuss quantum electrodynamics and the Foldy-Wouthuysen 10 transformation which we note is a position operator identical to the Pryce-Newton-Wigner position 11 operator. The classical version of the operators are shown to be essential for the treatment of 12 classical relativistic particles in general relativity, of special interest being the case of binary 13 systems (black holes/neutron stars) which emit gravitational radiation. 14 Keywords: rotation; spin; position operators 15 16 I.Introduction 17 Rotation effects in relativistic systems involve many new concepts not needed in 18 non-relativistic classical physics. Some of these are quantum mechanical (where the emphasis is on 19 “spin”). Thus, our emphasis will be on quantum electrodynamics (QED) and both special and 20 general relativity. Also, as in [1] , we often use “spin” in the generic sense of meaning “internal” spin 21 in the case of an elementary particle and “rotation” in the case of an elementary particle.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 ANGULAR MOMENTUM and ROTATIONS
    Chapter 5 ANGULAR MOMENTUM AND ROTATIONS In classical mechanics the total angular momentum L~ of an isolated system about any …xed point is conserved. The existence of a conserved vector L~ associated with such a system is itself a consequence of the fact that the associated Hamiltonian (or Lagrangian) is invariant under rotations, i.e., if the coordinates and momenta of the entire system are rotated “rigidly” about some point, the energy of the system is unchanged and, more importantly, is the same function of the dynamical variables as it was before the rotation. Such a circumstance would not apply, e.g., to a system lying in an externally imposed gravitational …eld pointing in some speci…c direction. Thus, the invariance of an isolated system under rotations ultimately arises from the fact that, in the absence of external …elds of this sort, space is isotropic; it behaves the same way in all directions. Not surprisingly, therefore, in quantum mechanics the individual Cartesian com- ponents Li of the total angular momentum operator L~ of an isolated system are also constants of the motion. The di¤erent components of L~ are not, however, compatible quantum observables. Indeed, as we will see the operators representing the components of angular momentum along di¤erent directions do not generally commute with one an- other. Thus, the vector operator L~ is not, strictly speaking, an observable, since it does not have a complete basis of eigenstates (which would have to be simultaneous eigenstates of all of its non-commuting components). This lack of commutivity often seems, at …rst encounter, as somewhat of a nuisance but, in fact, it intimately re‡ects the underlying structure of the three dimensional space in which we are immersed, and has its source in the fact that rotations in three dimensions about di¤erent axes do not commute with one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamilton Equations, Commutator, and Energy Conservation †
    quantum reports Article Hamilton Equations, Commutator, and Energy Conservation † Weng Cho Chew 1,* , Aiyin Y. Liu 2 , Carlos Salazar-Lazaro 3 , Dong-Yeop Na 1 and Wei E. I. Sha 4 1 College of Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; [email protected] 2 College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61820, USA; [email protected] 3 Physics Department, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61820, USA; [email protected] 4 College of Information Science and Electronic Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] † Based on the talk presented at the 40th Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium (PIERS, Toyama, Japan, 1–4 August 2018). Received: 12 September 2019; Accepted: 3 December 2019; Published: 9 December 2019 Abstract: We show that the classical Hamilton equations of motion can be derived from the energy conservation condition. A similar argument is shown to carry to the quantum formulation of Hamiltonian dynamics. Hence, showing a striking similarity between the quantum formulation and the classical formulation. Furthermore, it is shown that the fundamental commutator can be derived from the Heisenberg equations of motion and the quantum Hamilton equations of motion. Also, that the Heisenberg equations of motion can be derived from the Schrödinger equation for the quantum state, which is the fundamental postulate. These results are shown to have important bearing for deriving the quantum Maxwell’s equations. Keywords: quantum mechanics; commutator relations; Heisenberg picture 1. Introduction In quantum theory, a classical observable, which is modeled by a real scalar variable, is replaced by a quantum operator, which is analogous to an infinite-dimensional matrix operator.
    [Show full text]
  • The Position Operator Revisited Annales De L’I
    ANNALES DE L’I. H. P., SECTION A H. BACRY The position operator revisited Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 49, no 2 (1988), p. 245-255 <http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1988__49_2_245_0> © Gauthier-Villars, 1988, tous droits réservés. L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam. org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright. Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques http://www.numdam.org/ .
    [Show full text]
  • 22.51 Course Notes, Chapter 9: Harmonic Oscillator
    9. Harmonic Oscillator 9.1 Harmonic Oscillator 9.1.1 Classical harmonic oscillator and h.o. model 9.1.2 Oscillator Hamiltonian: Position and momentum operators 9.1.3 Position representation 9.1.4 Heisenberg picture 9.1.5 Schr¨odinger picture 9.2 Uncertainty relationships 9.3 Coherent States 9.3.1 Expansion in terms of number states 9.3.2 Non-Orthogonality 9.3.3 Uncertainty relationships 9.3.4 X-representation 9.4 Phonons 9.4.1 Harmonic oscillator model for a crystal 9.4.2 Phonons as normal modes of the lattice vibration 9.4.3 Thermal energy density and Specific Heat 9.1 Harmonic Oscillator We have considered up to this moment only systems with a finite number of energy levels; we are now going to consider a system with an infinite number of energy levels: the quantum harmonic oscillator (h.o.). The quantum h.o. is a model that describes systems with a characteristic energy spectrum, given by a ladder of evenly spaced energy levels. The energy difference between two consecutive levels is ∆E. The number of levels is infinite, but there must exist a minimum energy, since the energy must always be positive. Given this spectrum, we expect the Hamiltonian will have the form 1 n = n + ~ω n , H | i 2 | i where each level in the ladder is identified by a number n. The name of the model is due to the analogy with characteristics of classical h.o., which we will review first. 9.1.1 Classical harmonic oscillator and h.o.
    [Show full text]
  • Assignment 7: Solution
    Quantum Mechanics I / Quantum Theory I. 14 December, 2015 Assignment 7: Solution 1. In class, we derived that the ground state of the harmonic oscillator j0 is given in the position space as 1=4 m! 2 −m!x =2~ 0(x) = xj0 = e : π~ (a) This question deals with finding the state in the momentum basis. Let's start off by finding the position operatorx ^ in the momentum basis. Show that @ pjx^j = i pj : ~@p This is analogous to the expression of the momentum in the position basis, @ xjp^j = −i~ @x xj . You will use [Beck Eq. 10.56] expressing the momentum eigenstate in the position basis as well as the definition of the Fourier transform. @ (b) Sincea ^j0 = 0 and the position operator pjx^ = i~ @p , construct a differential equation to find the wavefunction in momentum space pj0 = f0(p). Solve this equation to find f0(p). Plot f0(p) in the momentum space. (c) Verify that your f0(p) = pj0 derived above is the Fourier transform of xj0 = 0(x). Answer (a) Lets find the position operator in momentum space pjx^j = pjx^1^j Z = dx pjx^jx xj Z = dx pjx x xj * x^jx = xjx : Now the normalized wavefunction of the momentum eigenstate in the position representation is 1 xjp = p eipx=~ Eq 10.56 in Beck 2π~ Z 1 −ipx= ) pjx^j = p dxe ~x xj : (1) 2π~ Due Date: December. 14, 2015, 05:00 pm 1 Quantum Mechanics I / Quantum Theory I. 14 December, 2015 Now @ −ix e−ipx=~ = e−ipx=~ @p ~ @ i e−ipx=~ = xe−ipx=~: ~ @p Inserting into Eq (1): i Z @ pjx^j = p ~ dx e−ipx=~ xj 2π~ @p Z @ 1 −ipx= = i~ p dxe ~ xj @p 2π~ @ = i pj ; ~@p where e(p) is the Fourier transform of (x).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Mathematical Formalism of Quantum Mechanics
    Chapter 3 Mathematical Formalism of Quantum Mechanics 3.1 Hilbert Space To gain a deeper understanding of quantum mechanics, we will need a more solid math- ematical basis for our discussion. This we achieve by studying more thoroughly the structure of the space that underlies our physical objects, which as so often, is a vector space, the Hilbert space . Definition 3.1 A Hilbert space is a finite- or infinite-dimensional, linear vector space with scalar product in C. The Hilbert space provides, so to speak, the playground for our analysis. In analogy to a classical phase space, the elements of the vector space, the vectors, are our possible physical states. But the physical quantities we want to measure, the observables, are now operators acting on the vectors. As mentioned in Definition 3.1, Hilbert spaces can be finite- or infinite-dimensional, as opposed to classical phase spaces (which are always 6n-dimensional, where n is the particle number). We shall therefore investigate those two cases separately. 3.1.1 Finite–Dimensional Hilbert Spaces In finite dimensions the vectors of a Hilbert space, denoted by , and the corresponding scalar products differ from the standard Euklidean case onlyH by the choice of complex quantities C instead of real ones R. It means that for vectors x, y ∈ H x1 y1 . i i x = . , y = . , x , y , C , (3.1) ∈ xn yn 55 56 CHAPTER 3. MATHEMATICAL FORMALISM OF QUANTUM MECHANICS where represents the n-dimensional Hilbert space under consideration, the scalar prod- uct canH be written as 1 y n i .
    [Show full text]
  • An Approach to Quantum Mechanics
    An Approach to Quantum Mechanics Frank Rioux Department of Chemistry St. John=s University | College of St. Benedict The purpose of this tutorial is to introduce the basics of quantum mechanics using Dirac bracket notation while working in one dimension. Dirac notation is a succinct and powerful language for expressing quantum mechanical principles; restricting attention to one-dimensional examples reduces the possibility that mathematical complexity will stand in the way of understanding. A number of texts make extensive use of Dirac notation (1-5). In addition a summary of its main elements is provided at: http://www.users.csbsju.edu/~frioux/dirac/dirac.htm. Wave-particle duality is the essential concept of quantum mechanics. DeBroglie expressed this idea mathematically as λ = h/mv = h/p. On the left is the wave property λ, and on the right the particle property mv, momentum. The most general coordinate space wave function for a free particle with wavelength λ is the complex Euler function shown below. ⎛⎞⎛⎞⎛⎞x xx xiλπ==+exp⎜⎟⎜⎟⎜⎟ 2 cos 2 π i sin 2 π ⎝⎠⎝⎠⎝⎠λ λλ Equation 1 Feynman called this equation “the most remarkable formula in mathematics.” He referred to it as “our jewel.” And indeed it is, because when it is enriched with de Broglie’s relation it serves as the foundation of quantum mechanics. According to de Broglie=s hypothesis, a particle with a well-defined wavelength also has a well-defined momentum. Therefore, we can obtain the momentum wave function (unnormalized) of the particle in coordinate space by substituting the deBroglie relation into equation (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Rotations and Angular Momentum
    rotations.nb:11/3/04::13:48:13 1 RotationsandAngularmomentum Á Intro Thematerialheremaybefoundin SakuraiChap3:1-3,(5-6),7,(9-10) MerzbacherChap11,17. Chapter11ofMerzbacherconcentratesonorbitalangularmomentum.Sakurai,andCh17ofMerzbacherfocuson angularmomentuminrelationtothegroupofrotations.Justaslinearmomentumisrelatedtothetranslationgroup, angularmomentumoperatorsaregeneratorsofrotations.Thegoalistopresentthebasicsin5lecturesfocusingon 1.J asthegeneratorofrotations. 2.RepresentationsofSO 3 3.Additionofangularmomentum+ / 4.OrbitalangularmomentumandYlm ' s 5.Tensoroperators. Á Rotations&SO(3) ü Rotationsofvectors Beginwithadiscussionofrotationsappliedtoa3-dimensionalrealvectorspace.Thevectorsaredescribedbythreereal vx numbers,e.g.v = v .ThetransposeofavectorisvT = v , v , v .Thereisaninnerproductdefinedbetweentwo ML y ]\ x y z M ] M vz ] + / T M T ] vectorsbyu ÿ v =Nv ÿ^u = uv cos f,wherefistheanglebetweenthetwovectors.Underarotationtheinnerproduct betweenanytwovectorsispreserved,i.e.thelengthofanyvectorandtheanglebetweenanytwovectorsdoesn't change.Arotationcanbedescribedbya3ä3realorthogonalmatrixRwhichoperatesonavectorbytheusualrulesof matrixmultiplication v'x vx v' = R v and v' , v' , v' = v , v , v RT ML y ]\ ML y ]\ x y z x y z M ] M ] M v'z ] M vz ] + / + / M ]]] M ]]] N ^ N ^ Topreservetheinnerproduct,itisrequirdthatRT ÿ R = 1 u'ÿ v' = uRT ÿ Rv = u1v = u ÿ v Asanexample,arotationbyfaroundthez-axis(orinthexy-plane)isgivenby rotations.nb:11/3/04::13:48:13 2 cos f -sin f 0 R f = sin f cos f 0 z ML ]\ M ] + / M 0 0 1 ] M ]]] N ^ Thesignconventionsareappropriateforarighthandedcoordinatesystem:putthethumbofrighthandalongz-axis,
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Why Do We Need Position Operator in Quantum Theory?
    A New Look at the Position Operator in Quantum Theory Felix M. Lev Artwork Conversion Software Inc., 1201 Morningside Drive, Manhattan Beach, CA 90266, USA (Email: [email protected]) Abstract: In standard quantum theory the momentum and position operators are on equal footing and wave functions in momentum and coordinate representations are related to each other by the Fourier transform. However, while the momentum operator is unambiguously defined as one of the operators of the symmetry algebra, the position operator has a physical meaning only in semiclassical approximation and should be defined from additional considerations. We show that, as a consequence of the in- consistent definition of standard position operator, an inevitable effect in standard theory is the wave packet spreading (WPS) of the photon coordinate wave function in directions perpendicular to the photon momentum. This leads to the fundamen- tal paradox that we should see not separate stars but only an almost continuous background from all stars. We propose a new consistent definition of the position op- erator. In this approach WPS in directions perpendicular to the particle momentum is absent regardless of whether the particle is nonrelativistic or relativistic. Hence the above paradox is resolved. Moreover, for an ultrarelativistic particle the effect of WPS is absent at all. Different components of the new position operator do not com- mute with each other and, as a consequence, there is no wave function in coordinate representation. PACS: 11.30.Cp, 03.65.-w, 03.63.Sq, 03.65.Ta Keywords: quantum theory, position operator, semiclassical approximation 1 Why do we need position operator in quantum theory? In standard quantum theory the momentum and position operators are on equal foot- ing and wave functions in the momentum and coordinate representations are related to each other by the Fourier transform.
    [Show full text]
  • Observables and Measurements in Quantum Mechanics
    Chapter 13 Observables and Measurements in Quantum Mechanics ill now, almost all attention has been focussed on discussing the state of a quantum system. T As we have seen, this is most succinctly done by treating the package of information that defines a state as if it were a vector in an abstract Hilbert space. Doing so provides the mathemat- ical machinery that is needed to capture the physically observed properties of quantum systems. A method by which the state space of a physical system can be set up was described in Section 8.4.2 wherein an essential step was to associate a set of basis states of the system with the ex- haustive collection of results obtained when measuring some physical property, or observable, of the system. This linking of particular states with particular measured results provides a way that the observable properties of a quantum system can be described in quantum mechanics, that is in terms of Hermitean operators. It is the way in which this is done that is the main subject of this Chapter. 13.1 Measurements in Quantum Mechanics One of the most difficult and controversial problems in quantum mechanics is the so-called measurement Quantum System problem. Opinions on the significance of this prob- S lem vary widely. At one extreme the attitude is that there is in fact no problem at all, while at the other extreme the view is that the measurement problem Measuring is one of the great unsolved puzzles of quantum me- Apparatus chanics. The issue is that quantum mechanics only M ff provides probabilities for the di erent possible out- Surrounding Environment comes in an experiment – it provides no mechanism E by which the actual, finally observed result, comes Figure 13.1: System interacting with about.
    [Show full text]
  • PY 451 Notes — April 12-19, 2018 Mcintyre Chap. 7 Notes — Spectrum of Angular Momentum Professor Kenneth Lane1 A. Preliminar
    PY 451 Notes | April 12-19, 2018 McIntyre Chap. 7 notes | Spectrum of Angular Momentum Professor Kenneth Lane1 A. Preliminaries 1.) In the following I will use J = (Jx;Jy;Jz) = (J1;J2;J3) for a generic angular momentum, L = r × p for the orbital angular momentum of a particle whose position (operator) is r and momentum is p, and S for the spin operator of the particle. (For a massive particle, its spin is defined as its total angular momentum when it is at rest. The spin is therefore an intrinsic fundamental property of the particle, like its mass, electric charge, and other quantities which are not effected by the particle's motion. Defining the spin for a massless particle like the photon is a little tricky, so we won't be concerned with that here.) For a particle in motion, its total angular momentum (operator) is J = L + S. 2.) As for spin, angular momentum is a hermitian operator and its commutation relations with itself are [Jx;Jy] = i~Jz plus cyclic permutations. They are written compactly using the summation convention of summing over repeated indices: 3 X [Ja;Jb] = i~ abcJc ≡ i~ abcJc; (a; b; c = 1; 2; 3): (1) c=1 Here, abc is the completely antisymmetric Levi-Civita tensor introduced in the Chapter 2 notes. 3.) It is convenient to define ladder operators for angular momentum, y J± = Jx ± iJy = J1 ± iJ2 = J∓: (2) These have the commutation relations (from Eq. (1)) [Jz;J±] = ±~J± ; [J+;J−] = 2~Jz : (3) 4.) The square of the angular momentum operator is 2 2 2 2 1 2 J = JaJa ≡ Jx + Jy + Jz = 2 (J+J− + J−J+) + Jz : (4) This is also hermitian and its possible eigenvalues must be non-negative (≥ 0).
    [Show full text]