Cultural History Answer

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cultural History Answer Answers to Cultural History Section ANSWERS TO “DIG THAT PAD”: dated. Animal and plant 4. The pueblo roof that this remains from the fire pit beam was found in was 1. The Rule of Superposition can be radiocarbon dated. probably also built in A.D. applies to these layers. A sample of the fire pit clay 1286. Artifact E is older than arti- can be archaeomagneti- fact A. The bowl was depos- cally dated. Probably more 5. Tree B was cut down in ited first. After many years, than one of these would be A.D. 1300, while tree A was layers of dust and rock cov- done. If the dates gathered cut down in the A.D. 1286. ered it up. After the layers of from all the dating methods 1300 – 1286 = 14. Tree B earth built up, the shell pen- were around the same time, was cut down 14 years later. dant was left on the floor of then archeologists would 6. According to our calendar, the younger room. be very sure when the room the year A.D. 1300 was a was built and lived in. 2. There was another room wet year with abundant under the exposed room, 7. The shell pendant is made rainfall. The wide space because you can see the of seashells. The Gulf of between A.D. 1299 and ends of roof beams sticking California, the California 1300 tells us that there was out of the layer. Pacific coast, and the Gulf much rainfall during that of Mexico are the nearest year. The tree was able to 3. The upper exposed room source for shells. These absorb more water, nutri- was probably a living quar- ancient people traded for ents, and minerals. This ters, because a fire pit was shells from one or more of allowed the tree to build used there for cooking and these distant places or trav- more tissue in its stem, warmth. eled there to collect shells causing the space between the rings to be wider. 4. Archeologists can learn themselves. much from the fire pit by 8. Macaws are found in the 7. No. A.D. 1294 was within examining bone and plant rainforests of Mexico and a severe drought that fragments in the ash., They South America. Like the lasted about 23 years. can determine what kinds shell pendant, the macaw Archeologists are sure of of animals lived in the area, skeleton tells us that these this because of tree ring dat- and which ones people people traded/traveled far to ing. This is the only part of were eating. Burned pieces the south. our calendar that is factual. can be radiocarbon dated, The rest is hypothetical. too. ANSWERS “TREES OF TIME”: 8. A.D. 1274 was probably a 5. The builders of this dwelling 1. Tree A is older. It was cut year with average rainfall. were probably members of down in A.D. 1286, while The early cultures probably an agricultural community, tree B was cut down in the had a sufficient harvest that because usually only farm- A.D. 1300. year. ers would take the time and energy to build a house of 2. Tree B lived longer. It lived 9. The years A.D. 1300 to 1303 stone that they lived in near 38 years before it was cut were very wet years with their fields all the time. down while tree A lived 36 abundant rainfall. Probably, years. major flooding was occur- 6. Many things in the room ring near rivers. Structures can be used to date it. The 3. Tree A was cut down in A.D. that were situated near riv- roof beams can be tree ring 1286. 68 CULTURAL HISTORY CULTURAL HISTORY 69 ers or on the lowlands were but dendrochronology is a 4. Salado is a Spanish word probably flooded out. science that can give them meaning “salty.” The Salado definite and precise num- culture was named after the 10. These were good years bers relating to spans of Salt River in Arizona where for planting crops, but the time between events. these people had lived. houses and the crops prob- ably had to be situated away ANSWERS FOR “WHAT DOES IT 5. Mogollon: Juan Ignacio from water, because there MEAN”: Flores Mogollon is the may have been flooding. name of an early Spanish Crops near the rivers were 1. Anasazi is a Navajo, or governor of New Mexico. probably washed away. Dine’, term translated as His name was given to the “ancient enemy” or “ancient Mogollon Rim, Mogollon 11. Yes. During this time of foreigners.” When arche- Mountains, and ancient abundant rainfall, existing ologists wanted to name Mogollon culture. The marshes were more exten- this culture, they asked the Mogollon lived in the sive and new marshes prob- Navajo people what they mountainous regions ably formed in low areas. called the ancient people between the Mogollon who had lived in the sites Rim and the Mogollon 12. Yes. Large, shallow stand- nearby. The Navajo, viewed Mountains and southeast ing bodies of water produce them as strangers and called into Chichuahua, Mexico. more plants and attract them “Anasazi.” The Hopi, more waterfowl. who consider the Anasazi 6. Casa Grande is a Spanish their ancestors, prefer to word that means “big or 13. Our calendar shows at least call them Hisatsinom, which grand house.” It is the name four years before it ends. means “people of long ago.” given to a Hohokam struc- 14. Tree A germinated about ture near the Gila River by 2. Hohokam is a Pima or A.D. 1250. Spanish explorers. Akimel “‘okham phrase 15. Tree B germinated about meaning “those who 7. Montezuma (Castle and A.D. 1260. have gone” or “all used Well): “Montezuma” actu- up.” Archeologists named ally refers to Moctezuma 16. Tree A germinated about the ancient farmers of II, the last Aztec emperor. A.D. 1250 and died in A.D. the Arizona desert the Settlers from the U.S. gave 1286. 1286 – 1250 = 36. Hohokam after excavating this name to Montezuma Tree A lived 36 years. Snake Town with the help Castle and Montezuma Well of Pima workers. because they believed that 17. Both tree A and tree B were Montezuma and the Aztec burned in the year A.D. 3. Sinagua is a Spanish phrase people had once occupied 1271. meaning “without water.” this area. Spanish explorers noticed 18. This was a very wet year. that the San Francisco Peaks 8. Tuzigoot is an Apache Some of the answers above area did not have water, so phrase, which has been are purely speculative, and they called the mountains, roughly translated as could be wrong. But these sierra sinagua. When arche- “crooked water.” It refers to are the kinds of clues that ologists discovered ancient the oxbow with Pecks Lake, archeologists use to try to sites in the Flagstaff area, which is near the pueblo. piece together the story of they took the Spanish name When archeologists exca- the past. Many times arche- given earlier to the peaks vated Tuzigoot pueblo, they ologists have little to go on, for this culture. were looking for a name for 70 CULTURAL HISTORY CULTURAL HISTORY 71 the site. An Apache worker ANSWERS TO “YOUR VISIT 10. The Sinagua mined salt named Ben Lewis suggested TO THE NATIONAL from large deposits outside “Tuzigoot.” The arche- MONUMENTS”: the present town of Camp ologists liked the name and Verde and traded it through- used it for the pueblo. 1. “Tuzigoot” is an Apache out the valley and to other phrase. It has been trans- regions. 9. Wupatki is a Hopi phrase lated as “crooked water.” It translated as “long house.” refers to Pecks Lake, which 11. The Sinagua generally did Archeologists adopted this is less than a mile north of not usually decorate their Hopi name for the Anasazi/ the monument. pottery. Once in a while Sinagua sites of Wupatki they experimented with National Monument north 2. When settlers first saw simple designs on their red of Flagstaff. Montezuma Castle, they did or brown plainware, such not think the local Apache as the one at Tuzigoot deco- 10. Canyon de Chelley (de had built it. They thought rated with white lines. shay): “Canyon de Chelly” the Aztecs had come north is a mispronunciation of and built the cliff dwell- 12. All but one of the decorated the Navajo word, ‘tsegi,” ing for their emperor types were traded into the which means “rock can- Montezuma. region from other cultures. yon.” Although the Navajo considered this canyon to 3.“Sinagua” is a Spanish term 13. Those fields are modern be the heart of their home- meaning “without water.” copper tailings, the refuse land, it was the location of Dr. Harold Colton, who first left from smelting copper. many Anasazi cliff dwellings studied this culture, named They have nothing to do before the Navajo moved to it after the Spanish name with the ancient Sinagua or the area. for the San Francisco Peaks, Tuzigoot. sierra sinagua. 11. Tonto: “Tonto” is a Spanish 14. The Sinagua cultivated corn/ word that means “fool.” 4. The villages were first con- maize, beans, squash and The Spanish had given the structed approximately in cotton. name “Tonto” to a group of the 12th century. The dates 15. Most archeologists surmise Apache west of the White are based on pottery cross- that it was protection from Mountains. Early settlers dating and tree ring dates. animals, enemies and/or adopted the name, and 5. The Sinagua left the Verde drafts. called the lands where the Valley around A.D.
Recommended publications
  • Arizona TIM PALMER FLICKR
    Arizona TIM PALMER FLICKR Colorado River at Mile 50. Cover: Salt River. Letter from the President ivers are the great treasury of noted scientists and other experts reviewed the survey design, and biological diversity in the western state-specific experts reviewed the results for each state. RUnited States. As evidence mounts The result is a state-by-state list of more than 250 of the West’s that climate is changing even faster than we outstanding streams, some protected, some still vulnerable. The feared, it becomes essential that we create Great Rivers of the West is a new type of inventory to serve the sanctuaries on our best, most natural rivers modern needs of river conservation—a list that Western Rivers that will harbor viable populations of at-risk Conservancy can use to strategically inform its work. species—not only charismatic species like salmon, but a broad range of aquatic and This is one of 11 state chapters in the report. Also available are a terrestrial species. summary of the entire report, as well as the full report text. That is what we do at Western Rivers Conservancy. We buy land With the right tools in hand, Western Rivers Conservancy is to create sanctuaries along the most outstanding rivers in the West seizing once-in-a-lifetime opportunities to acquire and protect – places where fish, wildlife and people can flourish. precious streamside lands on some of America’s finest rivers. With a talented team in place, combining more than 150 years This is a time when investment in conservation can yield huge of land acquisition experience and offices in Oregon, Colorado, dividends for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gila and Little Colorado General Stream Adjudications
    THE GILA AND LITTLE COLORADO GENERAL STREAM ADJUDICATIONS Cynthia M. Chandley 1 ©© 2014 2014 Snell Snell & & Wilmer Wilmer Arizona’s Watersheds 2 © 2014 Snell & Wilmer Scope of Adjudications Gila Adjudication Little Colorado River Adjudication 30,000 5,000 SOCs SOCs Claimants 85,000 14,000 Claimants 3 © 2014 Snell & Wilmer Initiation of Arizona’s Adjudications SRP initiates U.S. Supreme Court Phelps Dodge Verde River Buckeye Irrigation decides jurisdiction in on- initiates Little Adjudication District intervenes going state adjudications. Colorado River Ariz. v. San Carlos Adjudication Apache Tribe (U.S. 1983) 1974 1976 1978 1979 1980 1981 1983 1985 Arizona Supreme SRP initiates Phelps Dodge initiates Court consolidates Salt River Gila River Adjudication Arizona Arizona Supreme Court Gila River cases Adjudication Adjudication statues decides state jurisdiction ASARCO initiates San revised over federal and Indian Pedro River Adjudication water rights. U.S. v. Superior Court (Ariz. 1985) 4 © 2014 Snell & Wilmer Maricopa County Court Proceedings • 1986 – Judge Goodfarb issues Pretrial Order No. 1 • 1990 – Arizona Supreme Court grants interlocutory review of six key issues 5 © 2014 Snell & Wilmer Arizona Supreme Court Rulings • Issue 1: Service of process – Gila I (1992) • Issue 2: Subflow – Gila II (1993) & Gila IV (2000) • Issue 3: Indian reserved water rights – Gila V (2001) • Issues 4 & 5: Federal reserved groundwater rights – Gila III (1999) • Issue 6: To be decided. 6 © 2014 Snell & Wilmer Major Adjudication Issues Subflow Trial No. 1; Adjudication Gila III and San Subflow Order Carlos Apache Court defines ADWR Subflow defines saturated Tribe, et al. v. ADWR Subflow 50%/90-day test Technical Report floodplain Holocene Superior Court Delineation ADWR Revised alluvium and evidentiary Report Subflow Report hearing 1986 1988 1993 1994 1995 1999 2000 2002 2005 2009 2012 2014 2014 2012 20142014 Pretrial Order Gila IV – affirms Gila II: rejects Subflow Subflow trial No.
    [Show full text]
  • GR-03-13 Revised Title 5, Criminal Code
    GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY SACATON, AZ 85147 ORDINANCE GR-03-13 THE GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY COUNCIL HEREBY AMENDS THE 2009 GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY CODE BY RESCINDING TITLE 5, CRIMINAL CODE, AND ENACTING THE REVISED CRIMINAL CODE WHEREAS, the Gila River Indian Community Council (the "Community Council") is the governing body of the Gila River Indian Community (the "Community), a federally recognized and sovereign Indian tribe; and WHEREAS, the Community Council is authorized by Article XV, Section l(a)(9) of the Constitution and Bylaws of the Community (March 17, 1960) (the "Constitution") to promote and protect the health, peace, morals, education, and general welfare of the Community and its members; and WHEREAS, the Community Council is authorized by Article XV, Section 1(a)(17) of the Constitution to provide for the maintenance of law and order and the administration of justice by establishing a Community Court and police force and defining the powers and duties thereof; and WHEREAS, the Community Council is authorized by Article XV, Section 1(a)(19) of the Constitution to pass ordinances necessary or incidental to the exercise of any of their powers authorized by Article XV, Section 1(a) of the Constitution; and WHEREAS, the power to enact laws and ordinances is an inherent function of self-government which the Community has exercised over the years; and WHEREAS, the safety of the Community, the ability to prosecute criminal behavior, and the ability to order longer or enhanced sentences as appropriate to the offense and
    [Show full text]
  • Relation of Sediment Load and Flood-Plain Formation to Climatic Variability, Paria River Drainage Basin, Utah and Arizona
    Relation of sediment load and flood-plain formation to climatic variability, Paria River drainage basin, Utah and Arizona JULIA B. GRAF U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, 375 S. Euclid, Tucson, Arizona 85719 ROBERT H. WEBB U.S. Geological Survey, 1675 W. Anklam Road, Tucson, Arizona 85745 RICHARD HEREFORD U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Division, 2255 North Gemini Drive, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 ABSTRACT sediment load for a given discharge declined fill that rises 1-5 m above the modern channel abruptly in the early 1940s in the Colorado bed. Flood-plain deposits are present in all Suspended-sediment load, flow volume, River at Grand Canyon (Daines, 1949; Howard, major tributaries of the Paria River. The area of and flood characteristics of the Paria River 1960; Thomas and others, 1960; Hereford, flood plains is slightly greater than 20 km2, and were analyzed to determine their relation to 1987a). The decline in suspended-sediment sediment volume is estimated to be about 40 climate and flood-plain alluviation between loads has been attributed to improved land use million m3 (Hereford, 1987c). Typically, flood 1923 and 1986. Flood-plain alluviation began and conservation measures initiated in the 1930s plains are not present in first-order drainage ba- about 1940 at a time of decreasing magnitude (Hadley, 1977). A change in sediment-sampler sins but are present in basins of second and and frequency of floods in winter, summer, type and in methods of analysis have been higher order where the stream channel is uncon- and fall. No floods with stages high enough to discounted as causes for the observed decrease fined and crosses nonresistant bedrock forma- inundate the flood plain have occurred since (Daines, 1949; Thomas and others, 1960).
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Streamflow Variability Within the Upper Gila River Basin
    Characterization of Streamflow Variability Within the Upper Gila River Basin By Jeremiah Morse Patrick Ostrye Surface Water Hydrology Semester Project Introduction As the human population in the American desert southwest continues to grow, its water resources are becoming increasingly taxed. One of the largest suppliers of surface water to this region is the Colorado River. It is managed and operated under many federal laws, compacts, court decisions, decrees, contracts, and regulatory guidelines know as the Colorado River Compact, or “Law of the River”, which was singed into existence in 1922 by Secretary of Commerce, Herbert Hoover (Reclamation, 2007). These documents give a portion of the water in the Colorado River to seven states and on country, Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, California, and Mexico. In 1944 Arizona (the last state to sign the Colorado River Compact) finally signed the Colorado River Compact. By signing, Arizona was allotted 2.8 million-acre feet of water per year from the lower Colorado River Basin (CAP, 2007). In 1946, because of its water deficit from pumping groundwater, Arizona began educating its citizens and lobbying congress about the need for the Central Arizona Project, known as CAP (figure 1). CAP is designed to bring Colorado River water to Maricopa, Pima, and Pinal counties through 336 miles of concrete channels, pipelines, tunnels, dams, pumping plants, and siphons (CAP, 2007). This project would also refill the states depleting aquifers (CAP, 2007). A lengthy legal battle between California and Arizona soon took place. Figure 1 (CAP web site, 2007) 2 California argued that Arizona could not develop the full 2.8 million acre feet from the Colorado River it was allotted and also develop the water from the Gila River, saying that using Gila River water was an additional amount of water because it was a tributary of the Colorado River and, therefore, was accounted for in their 2.8 million acre feet (Reclamation, 2007; CAP, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Sinagua Sites Tour: Montezuma Castle, Montezuma
    Information as of Old Pueblo Archaeology Center Presents: March 4, 2021 99 a.m.-5:30a.m.-5:30 p.m.p.m. SouthernSouthern SinaguaSinagua SitesSites Tour:Tour: MayMay 8,8, 20212021 MontezumaMontezuma Castle,Castle, SaturdaySaturday MontezumaMontezuma Well,Well, andand TuzigootTuzigoot $30 donation ($24 for members of Old Pueblo Archaeology Center or Friends of Pueblo Grande Museum) Donations are due 10 days after reservation request or by 5 p.m. Wednesday May 8, whichever is earlier. SEE NEXT PAGES FOR DETAILS. National Park Service photographs: Upper, Tuzigoot Pueblo near Clarkdale, Arizona Middle and lower, Montezuma Well and Montezuma Castle cliff dwelling, Camp Verde, Arizona 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Saturday May 8: Southern Sinagua Sites Tour – Montezuma Castle, Montezuma Well, and Tuzigoot meets at Montezuma Castle National Monument, 2800 Montezuma Castle Rd., Camp Verde, Arizona What is Sinagua? Named with the Spanish term sin agua (‘without water’), people of the Sinagua culture inhabited Arizona’s Middle Verde Valley and Flagstaff areas from about 6001400 CE Verde Valley cliff houses below the rim of Montezuma Well and grew corn, beans, and squash in scattered lo- cations. Their architecture included masonry-lined pithouses, surface pueblos, and cliff dwellings. Their pottery included some black-on-white ceramic vessels much like those produced elsewhere by the An- cestral Pueblo people but was mostly plain brown, and made using the paddle-and-anvil technique. Was Sinagua a separate culture from the sur- rounding Ancestral Pueblo, Mogollon, Hohokam, and Patayan ones? Was Sinagua a branch of one of those other cultures? Or was it a complex blending or borrowing of attributes from all of the surrounding cultures? Whatever the case might have been, today’s Hopi Indians consider the Sinagua to be ancestral to the Hopi.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleohydrology of the Lower Colorado River Basin and Implications for Water Supply Availability
    Paleohydrology of the Lower Colorado River Basin and Implications for Water Supply Availability Jeffrey J. Lukas Lisa Wade Balaji Rajagopalan October 2012 Completion Report No. 223 Acknowledgements Funding for this project was provided by the Colorado Water Institute, the Colorado River District, the CU-CIRES Western Water Assessment program (itself supported by the NOAA Climate Program Office), and the CU Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (graduate student support for Lisa Wade). Connie Woodhouse and David Meko of the University of Arizona generated several of the tree- ring reconstructions of streamflow described in this report (see Table 1 and related text), and also provided nearly all of the underlying tree-ring data used for this project, having collected them for previous studies. David Kanzer and Eric Kuhn of the Colorado River District provided technical guidance throughout the project, and also provided the basemap for the Colorado River basin shown in Figure 1. Subhrendu Gangopadhyay and Tom Pruitt of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation provided the VIC hydrology model output that was used in comparisons with the naturalized streamflow records. Eric Kuhn of the Colorado River District provided the initial and continuing encouragement for this project. This report was financed in part by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey, through the Colorado Water Institute. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government. Additional copies of this report can be obtained from the Colorado Water Institute, E102 Engineering Building, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1033 970-491-6308 or email: [email protected], or downloaded as a PDF file from http://www.cwi.colostate.edu.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPREME COURT of ARIZONA En Banc ) Arizona Supreme Court ) No
    SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA En Banc ) Arizona Supreme Court ) No. WC-11-0001-IR IN RE GENERAL ADJUDICATION ) OF ALL RIGHTS TO USE WATER IN ) Maricopa County Superior THE GILA RIVER SYSTEM AND SOURCE ) Court Case Nos.: W-1, W-2, ) W-3 and W-4 ) (Consolidated) (Gila) IN RE GENERAL ADJUDICATION ) [Contested Case OF ALL RIGHTS TO USE WATER IN ) No. W1-104] THE LITTLE COLORADO RIVER SYSTEM ) AND SOURCE ) Apache County Superior ) Court Case No. 6417 (LCR) ) [Contested Case ) No. 6417-100] ) ) ) O P I N I O N __________________________________) Review from the Superior Court in Apache County and Maricopa County The Honorable Eddward P. Ballinger, Jr., Judge AFFIRMED ________________________________________________________________ THOMAS C. HORNE, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL Phoenix By Thomas C. Horne, Attorney General Theresa M. Craig, Assistant Attorney General Attorneys for the State of Arizona THE SPARKS LAW FIRM PC Scottsdale By Joe P. Sparks Laurel A. Herrmann Attorneys for the San Carlos Apache Tribe and Tonto Apache Tribe SALMON LEWIS & WELDON PLC Phoenix By M. Byron Lewis John B. Weldon, Jr. Mark A. McGinnis Attorneys for Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District and Salt River Valley Water Users’ Association SALMON LEWIS & WELDON PLC Phoenix By Paul R. Orme Attorney for Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage District and Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage District SNELL & WILMER LLP Phoenix By L. William Staudenmaier, III Andrew M. Jacobs Attorneys for Arizona Public Service Company, Freeport- McMoran Corporation, Roosevelt Water Conservation District POLSINELLI SHUGHART PC Phoenix By Lucas J. Narducci Margaret LaBianca Attorneys for BHP Copper Inc. ENGELMAN BERGER PC Phoenix By William H.
    [Show full text]
  • Free PDF Download
    ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST CONTINUE ON TO THE NEXT PAGE FOR YOUR magazineFREE PDF (formerly the Center for Desert Archaeology) is a private 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization that explores and protects the places of our past across the American Southwest and Mexican Northwest. We have developed an integrated, conservation- based approach known as Preservation Archaeology. Although Preservation Archaeology begins with the active protection of archaeological sites, it doesn’t end there. We utilize holistic, low-impact investigation methods in order to pursue big-picture questions about what life was like long ago. As a part of our mission to help foster advocacy and appreciation for the special places of our past, we share our discoveries with the public. This free back issue of Archaeology Southwest Magazine is one of many ways we connect people with the Southwest’s rich past. Enjoy! Not yet a member? Join today! Membership to Archaeology Southwest includes: » A Subscription to our esteemed, quarterly Archaeology Southwest Magazine » Updates from This Month at Archaeology Southwest, our monthly e-newsletter » 25% off purchases of in-print, in-stock publications through our bookstore » Discounted registration fees for Hands-On Archaeology classes and workshops » Free pdf downloads of Archaeology Southwest Magazine, including our current and most recent issues » Access to our on-site research library » Invitations to our annual members’ meeting, as well as other special events and lectures Join us at archaeologysouthwest.org/how-to-help In the meantime, stay informed at our regularly updated Facebook page! 300 N Ash Alley, Tucson AZ, 85701 • (520) 882-6946 • [email protected] • www.archaeologysouthwest.org ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST SPRING 2014 A QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF ARCHAEOLOGYmagazine SOUTHWEST VOLUME 28 | NUMBER 2 A Good Place to Live for more than 12,000 Years Archaeology in Arizona's Verde Valley 3 A Good Place to Live for More Than 12,000 Years: Archaeology ISSUE EDITOR: in Arizona’s Verde Valley, Todd W.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SMOKING COMPLEX in the PREHISTORIC SOUTHWEST By
    The smoking complex in the prehistoric Southwest Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Simmons, Ellin A. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 30/09/2021 00:29:48 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/552017 THE SMOKING COMPLEX IN THE PREHISTORIC SOUTHWEST by Ellin A* Simmons A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 6 8 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library• Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: /// A- APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: ^ 7 ' T.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Resource Use of the Flagstaff Area Monuments
    TRADITIONAL RESOURCE USE OF THE FLAGSTAFF AREA MONUMENTS FINAL REPORT Prepared by Rebecca S. Toupal Richard W. Stoffle Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 86721 July 19, 2004 TRADITIONAL RESOURCE USE OF THE FLAGSTAFF AREA MONUMENTS FINAL REPORT Prepared by Rebecca S. Toupal Richard W. Stoffle Shawn Kelly Jill Dumbauld with contributions by Nathan O’Meara Kathleen Van Vlack Fletcher Chmara-Huff Christopher Basaldu Prepared for The National Park Service Cooperative Agreement Number 1443CA1250-96-006 R.W. Stoffle and R.S. Toupal, Principal Investigators Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 86721 July 19, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................iv CHAPTER ONE: STUDY OVERVIEW ..................................................................................1 Project History and Purpose...........................................................................................1 Research Tasks...............................................................................................................1 Research Methods..........................................................................................................2 Organization of the Report.............................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Sculpted Sandstone Kayakers Go Overboard on Apache Lake
    After 100 Years, FOSSIL CREEK Will Flow WILD and FREE arizonahighways.com JUNE 2004 rarely seen Beauty Sculpted Sandstone Kayakers Go Overboard on Apache Lake Indian Arts Showplace Heard Museum Marking Its 75th Year A Survival Struggle Flight of the Condors {also inside} JUNE 2004 46 DESTINATION Walnut Canyon The Sinagua Indians had good reason to build their 22 COVER/PORTFOLIO 36 TRAVEL homes along the cliffs of Walnut Canyon. Nature’s Handiwork Chaos in a Tandem Kayak 42 BACK ROAD ADVENTURE in Sandstone Two wigglesome paddlers take a water-camping Drive through the stark beauty of Monument Valley class on Apache Lake and have a boatload of on the Navajo Indian Reservation. The odd shapes of multicolored petrified dunes called trouble getting the hang of capsize recovery. Coyote Buttes grace Arizona’s border with Utah. 48 HIKE OF THE MONTH The route up Strawberry Crater near Flagstaff ENVIRONMENT travels an area once violent Paria Canyon- 6 with volcanic activity. Vermilion Cliffs Fossil Creek Going Wild Again Wilderness By the end of December, this scenic stream in Coyote Monument 2 LETTERS & E-MAIL Buttes Valley central-Arizona will revert to a natural state as two Grand Canyon electric power plants are closed after nearly a 3 TAKING THE National Park OFF-RAMP Strawberry Crater hundred years of operation. Walnut Canyon National Monument 40 HUMOR Fossil MUSEUMS Creek 16 PHOENIX Heard Museum Marks 41 ALONG THE WAY Apache A nostalgic drive across Maricopa Lake Wells 75th Anniversary America is hard to beat— TUCSON Phoenix’s noted institution for Indian arts and culture except by arriving home continues to tie native creativity and traditions to in Arizona.
    [Show full text]