DOCSLIB.ORG

Madera Integrated Regional Water Management Plan 2019 Prop 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Madera Integrated Regional Water Management Plan 2019 Prop 1 MADERA INTEGRATED REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN PROPOSITION 1 UPDATE MAY 2019 MADERA IRWMP PROPOSITION 1 UPDATED MADERA IRWMP PROPOSITION 1 UPDATE Prepared for: Madera Regional Water Management Group. P. O. Box 1061 Coarsegold, CA 93614 Contact Person: Jeannie Habben Consultant: 2816 Park Avenue Merced, CA 95348 Contact: Garth Pecchenino, P.E. Phone: (661) 616-2600(209) 723-2066 May 2019 © Copyright by Quad Knopf, Inc. Unauthorized use prohibited. Project #180028 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 - Strategies .................................................................................................................................................... 1-2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 - Mission Statement .................................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 - Governance ................................................................................................................................................ 2-2 2.3 - Goals ............................................................................................................................................................. 2-2 2.4 - Accomplishments .................................................................................................................................... 2-4 2.5 - IRWMP Updates and Changes ............................................................................................................ 2-5 Region Description .................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 - Foothill/Mountain Region ................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 - Valley Region ............................................................................................................................................ 3-2 3.3 - San Joaquin River Hydrologic Region ............................................................................................. 3-5 3.3.1 - Chowchilla Subbasin ............................................................................................................ 3-5 3.3.2 - Madera Subbasin ................................................................................................................... 3-5 3.3.3 - Delta-Mendota Subbasin .................................................................................................... 3-6 3.4 - Watersheds ................................................................................................................................................ 3-6 3.5 - Land Subsidence ...................................................................................................................................... 3-8 3.5.1 - Cause of Local Land Subsidence ...................................................................................... 3-8 3.5.2 - History of Land Subsidence in Area ............................................................................... 3-8 3.5.3 - Loss of Storage Due to Subsidence ................................................................................. 3-9 3.5.4 - Recent Land Subsidence Impacts .................................................................................... 3-9 3.6 - Water Quality Problem Areas .......................................................................................................... 3-11 3.6.1 - Arsenic and Uranium ........................................................................................................ 3-11 3.6.2 - Salt and Nitrate ................................................................................................................... 3-11 3.6.3 - Central Valley Salt and Nitrate Management Plan ................................................ 3-12 3.7 - Groundwater Levels ............................................................................................................................ 3-13 3.8 - Agricultural Water Demands ........................................................................................................... 3-15 Plan Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 - New Objectives Added for Proposition 1 Update ....................................................................... 4-1 4.2 - Valley Goals ............................................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.3 - Foothill/Mountain Goals ...................................................................................................................... 4-2 4.4 - Additional Goals for Proposition 1 ................................................................................................... 4-2 4.5 - Valley Goals ............................................................................................................................................... 4-4 4.5.1 - Goal No. 1: Achieve groundwater sustainability ....................................................... 4-4 4.5.2 - Goal No. 2: Expand Stakeholder Education ................................................................. 4-7 4.5.3 - Goal No. 3: Assure groundwater quality meets drinking and irrigation water quality standards ................................................................................................................................ 4-8 Madera Regional Water Management Group May 2019 Proposition 1 Update. Page i 4.5.4 - Goal No. 4: Improve Flood Control and Protection .................................................. 4-8 4.5.5 - Goal No. 5: Improve Conservation .................................................................................. 4-9 4.6 - Foothill and Mountain Goals ............................................................................................................ 4-10 4.6.1 - Goal No. 6: Create practical, enforceable policies resulting in sustainable groundwater management .......................................................................................................... 4-10 4.6.2 - Goal No. 7: Improve Water Quality ............................................................................. 4-11 4.6.3 - Goal No. 8: Improve Watershed Management ........................................................ 4-12 4.6.4 - Goal No. 9: Expand Stakeholder Education .............................................................. 4-13 4.6.5 - Goal No. 10: Conservation.............................................................................................. 4-13 Resource Management Strategies ...................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 - New CWP Criteria for Prop 1 Update .............................................................................................. 5-1 5.2 - Update to CWP Criteria ......................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2.1 - Climate Change ....................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2.2 - Reducing Energy Consumption ....................................................................................... 5-1 5.2.3 - Adaptation Strategies .......................................................................................................... 5-2 Project Review Process .......................................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 - Review of New Objectives.................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 - Integration of Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 6-2 Plan Performance and Monitoring ..................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 - General Information ............................................................................................................................... 7-1 7.2 - Monitoring Program Parameters ...................................................................................................... 7-1 7.3 - Project Specific Impacts/Benefit Analysis..................................................................................... 7-1 7.4 - Data Management Procedures ........................................................................................................... 7-2 7.5 - Other Topics .............................................................................................................................................. 7-2 Local Land Use and Water Planning .................................................................................. 8-1 8.1 - Madera Regional Water Management Group ............................................................................... 8-1 8.2 - Local Land Use Planning Documents .............................................................................................. 8-1 8.3 - Local Water Plans ..................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 71, No. 238/Tuesday, December 12, 2006/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 12, 2006 / Notices 74515 service called eSubscription that allows f. Location: On the San Joaquin River, 119,940 acre-feet at an elevation of you to keep track of all formal issuances near North Fork, California. The project about 3,330 feet above mean sea level; and submittals in specific dockets. This affects 2,036 cres of Federal land one power tunnel about 7.5 miles long, can reduce the amount of time you administered by the Sierra National to convey water from Mammoth Pool spend researching proceedings by Forest. Reservoir to Mammoth Pool automatically providing you with g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Powerhouse; two small diversions on notification of these filings, document Act 16 U.S.C. 791(a)–825(r). Rock Creek and Ross Creek; and one 230 summaries and direct links to the h. Applicant Contact: Russ W. kV transmission line about 6.7 miles documents. To register for this service, Krieger, Vice President Power long that connects the Mammoth Pool go to http://www.ferc.gov/ Production, Southern California Edison Powerhouse to the non-project Big esubscribenow.htm. Company, 300 N. Lone Hill Ave., San Creek No. 3 Switchyard. Type of Public meetings or site visits will be Dimas, CA 91773. Phone: 909–394– Application: New—Major Modified posted on the Commission’s calendar 8667. License located at http://www.ferc.gov/ i. FERC Contact: Jim Fargo at (202) m. A copy of the application is EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along 502–6095, or e-mail: available for review at the Commission with other related information.
    [Show full text]
  • Terr–14 Mule Deer
    TERR–14 MULE DEER 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2001 and 2002, the literature review, a camera feasibility study, the Mammoth Pool migration study (observation study, boat survey, and remote camera study), and a hunter access study were completed. A map of known mule deer summer and winter ranges, migration corridors, and holding areas was created based on the literature review. The camera feasibility study was conducted in the fall of 2001 to test the remote camera system for the spring 2002 remote camera study. The cameras were successful at capturing photographs of 82 animals, including photographs of six deer, during this testing period. The Mammoth Pool migration study consisted of an observation study, boat survey, and remote camera study. The study focused on documenting key migration routes across the reservoir and relative use, identifying potential migration barriers, and documenting any deer mortality in the reservoir. The observation study consisted of two observers positioned with binoculars at two observation points on Mammoth Pool at dusk and dawn in order to observe migrating deer. There were no observations of deer using the dam road. Two observations of deer were made out of a total of 51 observation periods. One observation consisted of a single deer that swam from the Windy Point Boat Launch area to the Mammoth Pool Boat Launch area. The other observation was of one group of five adult deer approaching the reservoir near the observation point by the Mammoth Pool Boat Launch, but turning back up the hill. There was no sign of difficulty in the deer swimming or exiting the reservoir and no obvious disturbance to the deer that turned back.
    [Show full text]
  • ZACHARY B. SHARP, Phd Research Engineer, Utah State University 435‐797‐3167 / [email protected]
    ZACHARY B. SHARP, PhD Research Engineer, Utah State University 435‐797‐3167 / [email protected] EDUCATION PhD Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State University, 2016 Major: Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics. Dissertation: Applications of Computational Fluid Dynamics in Flow Metering and Meter Design. MS Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State University, 2009 Major: Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics. Thesis: Energy Losses in Cross Junctions BS Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State University, 2008 Major: Civil and Environmental Engineering. WORK SUMMARY 2009 ‐ Present: Research Engineer, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 2009 ‐ Present: Independent Engineering Consultant 2007 ‐ 2009: Research Assistant/Graduate Student, Utah State University/Utah Water Research Laboratory 2004 - 2007: Engineering Lab technician, Utah State University/Utah Water Research Laboratory 1998 ‐ 2004: Construction Worker, Various companies and responsibilities in residential and commercial construction EXPERIENCE Extensive experience performing hydraulic structure physical model studies on dams and spillways, pumping pits, power plant intakes, erosion control issues, pipelines, channels, spillway basins, gated structures, control structures, outlet and energy dissipation structures, fish screens, bypasses, sewer and storm water systems. A sample list of model studies is shown below. Hydraulic Structures (Partial Listing) 2016, Physical Model Study of the Tekai Dam and Stair Step Spillway for to evaluate gate operation Snowy Mountain Engineering Consultants (SMEC). 2016, Physical Model Study of the Brainerd Dam to evaluate gate operation for Barr Engineering. 2015, Physical Model Study of the 2nd Street Pump Station in Fargo North Dakota conducted for the Cascade Pump company. 2015, Physical Model Study of the John Hart Generating Station intake structure and operating gate conducted for SCN-Lavalin.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation Draft
    Chapter 11 Geology and Soils This chapter describes the affected environment for geology and soils, as well as potential environmental consequences and associated mitigation measures, as they pertain to implementing the alternatives. This chapter presents information on the primary study area (area of project features, the Temperance Flat Reservoir Area, and Millerton Lake below RM 274). It also discusses the extended study area (San Joaquin River from Friant Dam to the Merced River, the San Joaquin River from the Merced River to the Delta, the Delta, and the CVP and SWP water service areas). Affected Environment This section describes the affected environment related to geology, geologic hazards, erosion and sedimentation, geomorphology, mineral resources, soils, and salts. Where appropriate, geology and soils characteristics are described in a regional context, including geologic provinces, physiographic regions, or other large-scale areas, with some area-specific geologic maps and descriptions of specific soil associations. Geology This section describes the geology of the primary and extended study areas. Primary Study Area A description of the surficial geologic units encountered in the primary study area is presented in Table 11-1. Geologic maps of the primary study area and the area of project features are presented in Figure 11-1 and Figure 11-2, respectively. Draft – August 2014 – 11-1 Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation Environmental Impact Statement Table 11-1. Description of Surficial Geologic Units of the Primary Study Area Geologic Map of Millerton Lake Quadrangle, West-Central Sierra Nevada, California1 Formation Surficial Deposits General Features Abbreviation Plutonic rocks characterized by undeformed blocky hornblende prisms as long as 1 cm and by biotite books as Tonalite of Blue Canyon much as 5 mm across.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Topographic Maps of California
    USGS Topographic Maps of California: 7.5' (1:24,000) Planimetric Planimetric Map Name Reference Regular Replace Ref Replace Reg County Orthophotoquad DRG Digital Stock No Paper Overlay Aberdeen 1985, 1994 1985 (3), 1994 (3) Fresno, Inyo 1994 TCA3252 Academy 1947, 1964 (pp), 1964, 1947, 1964 (3) 1964 1964 c.1, 2, 3 Fresno 1964 TCA0002 1978 Ackerson Mountain 1990, 1992 1992 (2) Mariposa, Tuolumne 1992 TCA3473 Acolita 1953, 1992, 1998 1953 (3), 1992 (2) Imperial 1992 TCA0004 Acorn Hollow 1985 Tehama 1985 TCA3327 Acton 1959, 1974 (pp), 1974 1959 (3), 1974 (2), 1994 1974 1994 c.2 Los Angeles 1994 TCA0006 (2), 1994, 1995 (2) Adelaida 1948 (pp), 1948, 1978 1948 (3), 1978 1948, 1978 1948 (pp) c.1 San Luis Obispo 1978 TCA0009 (pp), 1978 Adelanto 1956, 1968 (pp), 1968, 1956 (3), 1968 (3), 1980 1968, 1980 San Bernardino 1993 TCA0010 1980 (pp), 1980 (2), (2) 1993 Adin 1990 Lassen, Modoc 1990 TCA3474 Adin Pass 1990, 1993 1993 (2) Modoc 1993 TCA3475 Adobe Mountain 1955, 1968 (pp), 1968 1955 (3), 1968 (2), 1992 1968 Los Angeles, San 1968 TCA0012 Bernardino Aetna Springs 1958 (pp), 1958, 1981 1958 (3), 1981 (2) 1958, 1981 1981 (pp) c.1 Lake, Napa 1992 TCA0013 (pp), 1981, 1992, 1998 Agua Caliente Springs 1959 (pp), 1959, 1997 1959 (2) 1959 San Diego 1959 TCA0014 Agua Dulce 1960 (pp), 1960, 1974, 1960 (3), 1974 (3), 1994 1960 Los Angeles 1994 TCA0015 1988, 1994, 1995 (3) Aguanga 1954, 1971 (pp), 1971, 1954 (2), 1971 (3), 1982 1971 1954 c.2 Riverside, San Diego 1988 TCA0016 1982, 1988, 1997 (3), 1988 Ah Pah Ridge 1983, 1997 1983 Del Norte, Humboldt 1983
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Service Research Natural Areas
    28. Fern Canyon 28. Fern Canyon (Meier 1979) Location This established RNA is on the San Dimas Experimental Forest, within the Angeles National Forest. It is approximately 6 miles (10 km) N. of the city of Claremont. It occupies portions of seven sects. in T1N, R8W SBBM (34°12'N., 117°43'W.), USGS Mt. Baldy quad (fig. 58). Ecological subsection – San Gabriel Mountains (M261Bd). Target Elements Chamise Chaparral (Adenostoma fasciculatum) and Canyon Live Oak (Quercus chrysolepis) Distinctive Features Well-Monitored Site: The RNA is located within an experimental forest. There is a good record of the impact and extent of fires in the area dating back to 1914 (six major fires have occurred). This record extends to the relative Figure 58—Fern Canyon RNA volume of pre- and post-fire stream flow in the three subdrainages within the RNA. Stream flow has changed appreciably among the three drainages since a major fire in 1938. Low-Elevation Ponderosa Pine: Brown’s Flat, a shallow 80-acre (32-ha) bowl created by an ancient land slump, contains the lowest elevation stand of Pinus ponderosa in S. California (about 3900 ft, 1189 m). This relictual stand of 81 individuals is well-isolated from other ponderosa pine stands in the San Gabriel Mountains and strongly affected by air pollution. There is almost no recent reproduction. Chaparral: This extensive vegetation formation occurs as chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum) and Ceanothus-dominated types. It was extensively burned in 1975 and, thus, is vigorous (fig. 59). Oak Woodlands: The area covered by this vegetation is extensive and varied.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydropower Technical Appendix
    Hydropower Hydropower Technical Appendix UPPER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN STORAGE INVESTIGATION Initial Alternatives Information Report Hydropower Technical Appendix TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................. 1-1 STUDY AREA.........................................................................................................................1-2 SURFACE WATER STORAGE MEASURES CONSIDERED IN THE IAIR ...........................1-3 ORGANIZATION OF THIS TECHNICAL APPENDIX.............................................................1-3 CHAPTER 2. EXISTING AND FUTURE WITHOUT-PROJECT CONDITIONS......... 2-1 HYDROPOWER BACKGROUND ..........................................................................................2-1 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE................................................................................................2-1 EXISTING HYDROPOWER FACILITIES IN THE UPPER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN....2-5 Friant Dam and Millerton Lake ............................................................................................2-9 Friant Power Project............................................................................................................2-9 PG&E Kerckhoff Hydroelectric Project ..............................................................................2-10 Kerckhoff No. 2 Powerhouse .........................................................................................2-10 Kerckhoff Dam and Lake................................................................................................2-11
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Response to FERC's
    KLAMATH RIVER RENEWAL CORPORATION March 22, 2018 DELIVERY VIA ELECTRONIC FILING David E. Capka, P .E. Office of Energy Projects Director, Division of Dam Safety and Inspections (D2SI) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E., Routing Code: PJ-13 Washington, D.C. 20426 RE: FERC No. P-14803, NATDAM-OR00559, CA00323, CA00234, CA00325; Response to October 5, 2017 Directive to Convene an Independent Board of Consultants Dear Director Capka: The Klamath River Renewal Corporation ("KRRC") responds to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's ("Commission") October 5, 2017 directive ("Directive") to convene an Independent Board of Consultants ("BOC") to review and assess aspects of the proposed dam removal process for the Lower Klamath Project (FERC No. P-14803). Resumes for each proposed BOC member are provided as attachments for your review and approval. This response also addresses the March 15, 2018 "Order Amending License and Deferring Consideration of Transfer Application," and specifically, Item no. 4 in the Appendix, "Additional Information Required for License Transfer Application." This response to the Directive is solely and exclusively attributable to KRRC. PacifiCorp will coordinate with KRRC and BOC to allow the BOC's work to be performed and completed consistent with the Directive. Except as may otherwise be expressly provided by PacifiCorp, all responses, statements of fact, views, opinions, interpretations, and other communications as may be provided in response to this Directive are solely and exclusively attributable to the KRRC, are based on facts and information that are known to the KRRC, and are not attributable to PacifiCorp or any other party. The Directive requires that the BOC be fully independent and consist of at least three members with the following experience: • Civil engineering (with specialized experience in dam construction and removal of both concrete and embankment dams) • Civil engineering (with specialized experience in hydrology, hydraulics, and stream diversion) • Geotechnical engineering 423 Washington St.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Big Creek Alp Hydroelectric Projects Settlement Agreement Proposed New License Conditions
    Big Creek ALP Settlement Agreement FERC Project Nos. 2085, 2175, 67 and 120 APPENDIX A BIG CREEK ALP HYDROELECTRIC PROJECTS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PROPOSED NEW LICENSE CONDITIONS Copyright 2007 by Southern California Edison Company February 2007 Big Creek ALP Settlement Agreement FERC Project Nos. 2085, 2175, 67 and 120 Appendix A: BCALP Hydroelectric Projects Settlement Agreement Proposed New License Conditions TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INSTREAM FLOW, TEMPERATURE, FLOW, GEOMORPHOLOGY AND RIPARIAN RESOURCES...........................................................................1 1.1 Instream Flows ................................................................................1 1.1.1 Streamflow Requirements.....................................................1 1.1.1.1 Rock Creek ...........................................................1 1.1.1.2 Ross Creek ...........................................................2 1.1.1.3 San Joaquin River (Dam 6 to Redinger) ...............2 1.1.1.4 San Joaquin River (Mammoth Pool Dam to Dam 6) ..................................................................2 1.1.1.5 Stevenson Creek ..................................................3 1.1.1.6 Balsam Creek (Diversion to Big Creek).................3 1.1.1.7 Balsam Creek (Forebay to Diversion) ...................3 1.1.1.8 Big Creek (Dam 4 to Dam 5).................................3 1.1.1.9 Big Creek (Dam 5 to San Joaquin River) ..............3 1.1.1.10 Big Creek (Huntington Lake to Dam 4) .................4 1.1.1.11 Ely Creek ..............................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Mammoth Pool Reservoir Closure Dean A
    Logo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information United States Forest Sierra National Forest 1600 Tollhouse Road Department of Service Clovis, CA 93611 Agriculture 559-297-0706 TDD: 559-322-0425 FAX: 559-294-4809 File Code: 2670 Date: April 30, 2021 Route To: File Subject: Forest Order No. 05-15-51-21-06 – Mammoth Pool Reservoir Closure From: Dean A Gould, Forest Supervisor This document explains my rationale and the regulatory basis for implementing an Order prohibiting entry into the Mammoth Pool Reservoir within the Sierra National Forest. The purpose of Forest Order No. 05-15-51-21-06 is to protect natural resources by limiting human activity within the Mammoth Pool Reservoir to accommodate the annual deer migration crossing. This Order will be effective from May 1, 2021, through June 15, 2021. In 1960, the Mammoth Pool Dam was completed, forming the Mammoth Pool Reservoir. The Reservoir now exists upon a historical deer migration corridor. California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) records indicate that deer swim across Mammoth Pool Reservoir at several locations during migration. During a recent telemetry study (Kroeker 2018), migration of telemetered deer in this population usually occurred from April 1 through May 31. Weather related factors, however, such as plant phenology and impassable snow, effect the timing of migration in any given year (Bertram 1984), and migrations for individual animals could begin in late March or end in July, depending on such factors. In years past, Mammoth Pool Reservoir access was closed to recreational fishing during the time frame of May 1 through June 15 [Title 14, CCR Section 7.50(b)(109)], supporting annual deer migration across the Reservoir.
    [Show full text]
  • 1969 04 0003.Pdf
    INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SOIL MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING This paper was downloaded from the Online Library of the International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMGE). The library is available here: https://www.issmge.org/publications/online-library This is an open-access database that archives thousands of papers published under the Auspices of the ISSMGE and maintained by the Innovation and Development Committee of ISSMGE. STATE OF-THE-ART REPO RT ETAT ACTUEL DES CO N AISSAN CES EARTH AN D ROCKFILL DAM S BARRAGES EN TERRE ET EN EN ROCHbM EN T by Stanley D. W ilson, Consulting Engineer Seattle, W ashington, U .S.A. and R. Squier Portland, O regon, U .S.A. INTRODUCTION This paper is a report on the state-of-the- A dam, whether it be for power production, art of the design and construction of earth flood control, pumped storage, irrigation, and rockfill dams. As such, it is intended recreation, lowstream augmentation, or multi­ to reflect current design and construction purpose, contains many elementa. This report practise throughout the world, but the is concerned primarily with the embankment writers are well aware that neither they nor itaelf and not with such elementa a8 power- anyone else could possibly accomplish this houaes, apillways, diversion features and solely on the basis of personal experience outlet works except insofar as they interact and knowledge. A detailed review of the with and thereby affect the embankment per­ published literature plus extensive conver­ formance. Abutments and foundation treatment sations and correspondence with colleagues are considered essential elements of the em­ provides tha basis for most of this report, bankment although grouting per ae ia not cov­ but inevitably there are errors of omission, ered in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Wild and Scenic River Evaluation for the Inyo, Sequoia and Sierra National Forests
    Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region December 2015 Draft Wild and Scenic River Evaluation for Public Feedback on Revision of the Inyo, Sequoia and Sierra National Forests Land Management Plans In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]