Cogjm.Rv Flow Ad 07-84.Pdf (184.2Kb)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cogjm.Rv Flow Ad 07-84.Pdf (184.2Kb) River Flow Advisory Bureau of Reclamation Upper Colorado Region Salt Lake City, Utah Vol. 15, No. 5 July 1984 Runoff into the Colorado River Basin has been at a record high for the second year in succession which tr~nslates into full reservoirs and high river flows. -Ee: ,....,,,-.,....0,-,t- ;nfl"\?*ffl.!:>t-.:1"'\T'\ f'\TI ~e2-e-T''1Tf'\ ; .,.... Q_T"\O.,....!lTi-0..n..c -2.!'~ r A 1 t:t. !1 ~0 C ;,..,rn .,....; .,-,o.,....e a toll-free numbers are available. Utah residents may call 1-800-624-1094 and out-of-Utah residents may call 1-800-624-5099. Colorado River at Westwater Canyon The peak flow of 63,000 cfs occurred on May 27. The flow on July 16 was 24,000 cfs and will continue to decrease the rest of the summer. Cataract Canyon Including the Green River The peak flow through Cataract Canyon was 110,000 cfs on May 27. The flow was 35,000 cfs on July 16 and will continue to decrease. Lake Powell Lake Powell reached a high elevation of 3702.46 feet on July 7. The lake's elevation should now begin to go down slowly. The spillways will not be used. April-July inflow forecast to Lake Powell is 15. 2 million acre-feet, or 204 percent of average. Colorado River through Grand Canyon Releases through the Glen Canyon Powerplant and outlet tubes remain at 43,000 cfs. It is expected this release will be decreased to 26, 000 cfs in July as the inflow decreases. There are no daily fluctuations in river flows. Upper Green River - Fontenelle Reservoir Inflow into Fontenelle Reservoir was 3,500 cfs on July 15. The reservoir is at elevation 6 ,482 feet. Since the reservoir will not be allowed to fill much higher, releases will match the inflows. Green River Flows Below Flaming Gorge Dam Forecast inflow to Flaming Gorge Reservoir is 123 percent of average. The reservoir was at elevation 6, 039 feet on July 12. Releases from the dam a r e expected to average nearly 4,000 cfs, then they will gradually decrease t o abou t 3,400 cfs in Augus t. Page 2 Green River at Green River, Utah The Green River flows peaked at 42,000 cfs on May 27. They were 10,000 cfs on July 16 and will continue to decrease the remainder of the summer. San Juan River Basin The forecast of runoff into the San Juan River Basin remains at 117 percent of average. The flow of the San Juan River at Bluff peaked at 9, 600 cfs on May 27 and was 1,400 cfs on July 16. San Juan River - Navajo Reservoir Navajo Resevoir, now at elevation 6,084 feet, has 1. 7 million acre-feetoI storage, or 98 percent of capacity. The runoff above Navajo Reservoir is forecast to be about 117 percent of normal. Releases from Navajo Dam are expected to remain at 800 cfs. Gunnison River - Blue Mesa Reservoir Blue Mesa Reservoir is at elevation 7,518 feet, only 1 foot short of full, but it is not expected to rise any further. The runoff above Blue Mesa is forecast to be about 1.4 million acre-feet, or 206 percent of normal. Dolores River · - McPhee Reservoir McPhee Reservoir has already stored as much water as was planned for this year; therefore, the inflow will be released. The release on July 12, 70 cfs, will continue to decrease as the inflow decreases. Those seeking specific daily flow of the Dolores River or reservoir information on McPhee Reservoir are asked to call the Bureau of Land Management at (303) 247-4082 or the Bureau of Reclamation at (801) 524-5574. For curre.Q!_ini_ormation on ri ve_r flows: ___ _ Call the National Weather Service River Forecast Center, Salt Lake City - Telephune number (801) 524-5130. For further information on reservoirs and releases: Call the Upper Colorado Regional Office of the Bureau o f Reclamation, Salt Lake City - Telephone numbers (801) 524-5573 or 524-5571. .
Recommended publications
  • Colorado River Basin Update
    Colorado River Basin Update Wyoming Water Development Commission and Select Water Committee – Joint Meeting 13 May, 2021 Outline 1. Update on current hydrology 2. Current Topics A. Demand Management ( Wyoming and UCRC efforts) B. Drought Response Operations C. Discussion on Curtailment Procedures i. Discussions with Reclamation on Fontenelle Reservoir D. Discussion on post-2026 river operations E. Lake Powell Pipeline discussions 3. Wrap-Up 4. Q&A Upper Basin Drought Contingency Plan Three Elements A. Augmentation B. Demand Management Storage Agreement C. Drought Response Operations Agreement Demand Management A. Wyoming Discussions (support provided by UW extension) 1. Public meetings held during the fall of 2019 • Heard interest from water users in discussing both demand management and curtailment 2. Worked with key stakeholder group as well as focus groups on specific topics 3. Draft report prepared by UW team; final report out soon • Provides summary of public input and some recommendations on next steps • Will not address ultimate feasibility of Demand Management in Wyoming. More investigation still needed. B. UCRC effort 1. Four UB states & UCRC staff working with team of consultants to determine feasibility (technical, legal, policy and economic issues) 2. To be completed by fall of 2022 Drought Response Operations Navajo Reservoir Flaming Gorge Blue Mesa Reservoir Reservoir Agree on operations to implement under emergency conditions to maintain minimum power pool elevation at Lake Powell. By conserving water (temporarily) in Lake Powell or moving water available from upper CRSP facilities. Lake Powell Drought Response Operations A. Agreement Establishes a process to rely on available water in the CRSPA Initial Units as needed to reduce the risk of Lake Powell dropping below elevation 3,525’.
    [Show full text]
  • January 13, 2021 Executive Director's Report
    EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT TO THE COLORADO RIVER BOARD OF CALIFORNIA January 13, 2021 COLORADO RIVER BASIN WATER SUPPLY CONDITIONS REPORT As of January 4th, the surface water elevation at Lake Powell was 3,581.80 feet with 10.1 million- acre feet (MAF) of storage, or 42% of capacity. The surface water elevation at Lake Mead was 1,083.89 feet with 10.34 MAF of storage, or 40% of capacity. As of January 3rd, the total system storage was 27.50 MAF, or 46% of capacity, which is about 3.8 MAF less than the total system storage at this same time last year. As of January 6th, the Upper Basin reservoirs, excluding Lake Powell, ranged from 53% of capacity at Fontenelle Reservoir in Wyoming; 84% of capacity at Flaming Gorge Reservoir in Wyoming and Utah; 92% of capacity at Morrow Point, and 48% of capacity at Blue Mesa Reservoir in Colorado; and 63% of capacity at Navajo Reservoir in New Mexico. As of December 16, 2020, the forecasted unregulated inflow into Lake Powell for Water Year (WY) 2021 is 6.23 MAF (58% of normal). The forecasted April through July 2021 runoff into Lake Powell for Water Year-2021 is 4.05 MAF (57% of normal). For WY-2021, the November observed Lake Powell inflow was 0.26 MAF (55% of normal), and the December Lake Powell inflow forecast is 0.21 MAF (58% of normal). To date, WY-2021 precipitation is 65% and the current basin snowpack is 75% of normal. Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Webinar On January 8th, the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center (CBRFC) held a webinar to review the Basin’s current water supply conditions and forecasts.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of Operations for Flaming Gorge Dam Water Year 2013
    Annual Report of Operations For Flaming Gorge Dam Water Year 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior January 2015 Bureau of Reclamation Table of Contents Annual Report of Operations for Flaming Gorge Dam ............................................................ 1 Operational Decision Process for Water Year 2013 ................................................................. 2 Step 1: Flow Requests for Research, and Other Federal, State and Stakeholder Input ........ 2 Step 2: Development of Spring Proposal .............................................................................. 4 Step 3: Solicitation of Comments ........................................................................................ 4 Step 4: Final Decision .......................................................................................................... 4 Basin Hydrology and Operations .............................................................................................. 5 Progression of Inflow Forecasts............................................................................................ 5 Summary of Flaming Gorge Operations ............................................................................... 6 Spillway Inspection ............................................................................................................... 8 Flow Objectives Achieved in Water Year 2013 ....................................................................... 8 Spring Flow Objectives......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • September 9, 2020 Executive
    EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT TO THE COLORADO RIVER BOARD OF CALIFORNIA September 9, 2020 ADMINISTRATION Meeting Minutes, August 12, 2020 The draft minutes for the August 12, 2020, meeting of the Colorado River Board of California (CRB) have been prepared and were included in the Board meeting packet of materials and are proposed to be adopted at the September 9th, Board meeting. COLORADO RIVER BASIN WATER SUPPLY CONDITIONS REPORT As of August 31st, the water level at Lake Powell was 3,599.93 feet with 11.74 million- acre feet (MAF) of storage, or 48% of capacity. The water level at Lake Mead was 1,084.02 feet with 10.35 MAF of storage, or 40% of capacity. As of August 30th, the total system storage was 29.72 MAF, or 50% of capacity, which is about 2.57 MAF less than system storage at this same time last year. As of September 1st, the Upper Basin reservoirs, excluding Lake Powell, ranged from 85% of capacity at Fontenelle Reservoir in Wyoming; 86% of capacity at Flaming Gorge Reservoir in Wyoming and Utah; 96% of capacity at Morrow Point, and 59% of capacity at Blue Mesa Reservoir in Colorado; and 71% of capacity at Navajo Reservoir in New Mexico. As of August 17th, the mid-month forecast for the unregulated inflow into Lake Powell for Water Year (WY) 2020 is 6.18 MAF (57% of normal). The preliminary observed April through July 2020 runoff into Lake Powell for Water Year-2020 was 3.76 MAF (52% of normal). For WY- 2020, the July observed Lake Powell inflow was 0.29 MAF (27% of normal), and the August Lake Powell inflow forecast is 0.1 MAF (19% of normal).
    [Show full text]
  • River Flow Advisory
    River Flow Advisory Bureau . of Reclamation Upper Colorado Region Salt Lake City, Utah Vol. 15, No. 1 September 1984 River flows in the Upper Colorado River drainage, still high for this time of year, are not expected to decrease much for several weeks: While the daily update of operations and releases has been discontinued, the toll-free numbers now provide updates on Bureau of Reclamation activities and projects. Utah residents may call 1-800-624-1094 and out-of-Utah residents may call 1-800-624-5099. Colorado River at Westwater Canyon The flow of the Colorado River on September 10 was 7, 000 cfs, and is expected to decrease slightly over the next few weeks. Cataract Canyon Includin2 the Green- River The flow was 11,500 cfs on September 10 and will continue to decrease slightly. Lake Powell Lake Powell's elevation on September 10 was 3,699. Assuming normal inflow for this time of year, the lake should continue to go down slowly to elevation 3,682 by next spring. Colorado River through Grand Canyon . Releases through Glen Canyon Dam remain at 25,000 cfs. These releases are expected to be maintained with no daily fluctuations in river flows. Upper Green River - Fontenelle Reservoir Fontenelle Reservoir is now at elevation 6,482 feet. Releases through the dam will be reduced to about 600 cfs starting on September 17 for about 2 weeks during powerplant maintenance. Green River Flows Below Flaming Gorge Dam On September 10 Flaming Gorge Reservoir was at elevation 6,039.9 feet. Releases from the dam are expected to average 2, 500 cfs in September and October with usual daily fluctuations.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion Paper Is/Has Been Under Review for the Journal Biogeosciences (BG)
    Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Biogeosciences Discuss., 12, 6081–6114, 2015 www.biogeosciences-discuss.net/12/6081/2015/ doi:10.5194/bgd-12-6081-2015 BGD © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. 12, 6081–6114, 2015 This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Biogeosciences (BG). Dam tailwaters Please refer to the corresponding final paper in BG if available. compound the effects of reservoirs Dam tailwaters compound the effects of A. J. Ulseth and reservoirs on the longitudinal transport of R. O. Hall Jr. organic carbon in an arid river Title Page 1,2,* 2 A. J. Ulseth and R. O. Hall Jr. Abstract Introduction 1Program in Ecology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, USA Conclusions References 2Department of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, USA Tables Figures *now at: École Polytechniqe Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland Received: 3 April 2015 – Accepted: 7 April 2015 – Published: 24 April 2015 J I Correspondence to: A. J. Ulseth ([email protected]) J I Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. Back Close Full Screen / Esc Printer-friendly Version Interactive Discussion 6081 Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Abstract BGD Reservoirs on rivers can disrupt organic carbon (OC) transport and transformation, but less is known how downstream river reaches directly below dams contribute to OC pro- 12, 6081–6114, 2015 cessing than reservoirs alone. We compared how reservoirs and their associated tail- 5 waters affected OC quantity and quality by calculating particulate (P) OC and dissolved Dam tailwaters (D) OC fluxes, and measuring composition and bioavailability of DOC.
    [Show full text]
  • Gunnison River
    final environmental statement wild and scenic river study september 1979 GUNNISON RIVER COLORADO SPECIAL NOTE This environmental statement was initiated by the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation (BOR) and the Colorado Department of Natural Resources in January, 1976. On January 30, 1978, a reorganization within the U.S. Department of the Interior resulted in BOR being restructured and renamed the Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service (HCRS). On March 27, 1978, study responsibility was transferred from HCRS to the National Park Service. The draft environmental statement was prepared by HCRS and cleared by the U.S. Department of the Interior prior to March 27, 1978. Final revisions and publication of both the draft environmental statement, as well as this document have been the responstbility of the National Park Service. FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT GUNNISON WILD AND SCENIC RIVER STUDY Prepared by United States Department of the Interior I National Park Service in cooperation with the Colorado Department of Natural Resources represented by the Water Conservation Board staff Director National Par!< Service SUMMARY ( ) Draft (X) Final Environmental Statement Department of the Interior, National Park Service 1. Type of action: ( ) Administrative (X) Legislative 2. Brief description of action: The Gunnison Wild and Scenic River Study recommends inclusion of a 26-mile (41.8-km) segment of the Gunnison River, Colorado, and 12,900 acres (S,200 ha) of adjacent land to be classified as wild in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System under the administration of the National Park Service and the Bureau of Land Management, U.S. D. I. This river segment extends from the upstream boundary of the Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Monument to approximately 1 mile (1.6 km) below the confluence with the Smith Fork.
    [Show full text]
  • Cogjm Usdi New Rel 1969-06-11.Pdf (170.1Kb)
    UNITED STArrES DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR * * * * * * * * * * * * * ********news release BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Region 4, Solt Lake City, Utah Telephone: 524-5403 For release: Wednesday, June 11, 1969 BELOW NORMAL APRIL-JULY COLORADO RIVER RUNOFF OF 7.4 Ml LU ON ACRE-FEET FORECAST Moy hos been the third consecutive month of subnormal precipitation in the Colorado River Basin above Lees Ferry, causing the April-July runoff forecast to foll to 7.4 million acre-feet or 87 percent of normal, the Bureau of Reclamation announced today. An even lower runoff forecast is avoided only by the presence of above normal snow accumulations in the high mountains. Another milestone was reached lost month in the uti lization of water of the Colorado River in the Upper Basin . On Thursday night, Moy 29, 1969, water stored in Lake Powell reached elevation 3570 feet, which is "roted head" for the powerplont located at the toe of Glen Canyon Dom . "Roted head" is the lowest level at which water flowing through the turbines con drive the generators at their nameplate capacity. With normal rai nfall, it is expected that Lake Powell 's water surface should reach on all-time high in July at about elevation 3580 feet with a live storage of about 10,290,000 acre-feet. Planned releases from Lake Powell for water year 1969 ore about 8 . 8 million ocre­ feet. For the next 3 years thereafter annual releases should be near this amount in order to deliver Colorado River Compact requirements to the Lower Basin. The entire release wi 11 be used to generate power for power customers in both the Upper and Lower Bosi ns.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary U.S
    Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan Environmental Impact Statement PUBLIC DRAFT Executive Summary U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, Upper Colorado Region National Park Service, Intermountain Region December 2015 Cover photo credits: Title bar: Grand Canyon National Park Grand Canyon: Grand Canyon National Park Glen Canyon Dam: T.R. Reeve High-flow experimental release: T.R. Reeve Fisherman: T. Gunn Humpback chub: Arizona Game and Fish Department Rafters: Grand Canyon National Park Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan December 2015 Draft Environmental Impact Statement 1 CONTENTS 2 3 4 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................. vii 5 6 ES.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 7 ES.2 Proposed Federal Action ........................................................................................ 2 8 ES.2.1 Purpose of and Need for Action .............................................................. 2 9 ES.2.2 Objectives and Resource Goals of the LTEMP ....................................... 3 10 ES.3 Scope of the DEIS .................................................................................................. 6 11 ES.3.1 Affected Region and Resources .............................................................. 6 12 ES.3.2 Impact Topics Selected for Detailed Analysis ........................................ 6 13 ES.4
    [Show full text]
  • Management of the Colorado River: Water Allocations, Drought, and the Federal Role
    Management of the Colorado River: Water Allocations, Drought, and the Federal Role Updated March 21, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45546 SUMMARY R45546 Management of the Colorado River: Water March 21, 2019 Allocation, Drought, and the Federal Role Charles V. Stern The Colorado River Basin covers more than 246,000 square miles in seven U.S. states Specialist in Natural (Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, and California) and Resources Policy Mexico. Pursuant to federal law, the Bureau of Reclamation (part of the Department of the Interior) manages much of the basin’s water supplies. Colorado River water is used Pervaze A. Sheikh primarily for agricultural irrigation and municipal and industrial (M&I) uses, but it also Specialist in Natural is important for power production, fish and wildlife, and recreational uses. Resources Policy In recent years, consumptive uses of Colorado River water have exceeded natural flows. This causes an imbalance in the basin’s available supplies and competing demands. A drought in the basin dating to 2000 has raised the prospect of water delivery curtailments and decreased hydropower production, among other things. In the future, observers expect that increasing demand for supplies, coupled with the effects of climate change, will further increase the strain on the basin’s limited water supplies. River Management The Law of the River is the commonly used shorthand for the multiple laws, court decisions, and other documents governing Colorado River operations. The foundational document of the Law of the River is the Colorado River Compact of 1922. Pursuant to the compact, the basin states established a framework to apportion the water supplies between the Upper and Lower Basins of the Colorado River, with the dividing line between the two basins at Lee Ferry, AZ (near the Utah border).
    [Show full text]
  • Navajo Reservoir and San Juan River Temperature Study 2006
    NAVAJO RESERVOIR AND SAN JUAN RIVER TEMPERATURE STUDY NAVAJO RESERVOIR BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 125 SOUTH STATE STREET SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84138 Navajo Reservoir and San Juan River Temperature Study Page ii NAVAJO RESERVOIR AND SAN JUAN RIVER TEMPERATURE STUDY PREPARED FOR: SAN JUAN RIVER ENDANGERED FISH RECOVERY PROGRAM BY: Amy Cutler U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Upper Colorado Regional Office FINAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 1, 2006 ii Navajo Reservoir and San Juan River Temperature Study Page iii TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................1 1. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................3 2. OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................5 3. MODELING OVERVIEW .......................................................................................6 4. RESERVOIR TEMPERATURE MODELING ......................................................7 5. RIVER TEMPERATURE MODELING...............................................................14 6. UNSTEADY RIVER TEMPERATURE MODELING........................................18 7. ADDRESSING RESERVOIR SCENARIOS USING CE-QUAL-W2................23 7.1 Base Case Scenario............................................................................................23 7.2 TCD Scenarios...................................................................................................23
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Mead and Lake Powell
    Colorado River Water Supply Report Agenda Number 12. Total System Contents: 27.507 MAF 68% 8/26/13 Reservoir Capacities (MAF) Reservoir Current Change Maximum 76% Lake Mead 12.25 + 0.02 25.90 Lake Powell 10.84 - 0.55 24.30 Flaming Gorge Reservoir 2.84 - 0.05 3.75 Navajo Reservoir 0.86 - 0.05 1.70 Blue Mesa Reservoir 0.37 - 0.03 0.83 Fontenelle Reservoir 0.23 - 0.01 0.34 Morrow Point Reservoir 0.11 0.00 0.12 44% Lake Powell 3,700’ 97% 45%, 10.839 MAF 3,590’ 51% Lake Mead 1,220’ 47%, 12.248 MAF 1,106’ 1,075’ 3,680 1,130 Lake Powell Elevations (2013 August 24-Month Study) Lake Mead Elevations (2013 August 24-Month Study) 3,660 1,120 3,640 1,110 3,620 1,100 3,600 1,090 3,580 1,080 Historical 3,560 1,070 Historical Maximum Probable Forecast Maximum Probable Forecast Most Probable Forecast Most Probable Forecast 3,540 1,060 Minimum Probable Forecast Minimum Probable Forecast Shortage 3,520 1,050 The August 2013 24-Month study projected that with an annual release of 8.23 MAF (as was consistent in water year Based on a 2013), the January 1st elevation of Lake Powell would be potential shortage 3,574 ft, which is less than 3,575 ft and places Lake Powell in 2016, impacts to in the mid-elevation release tier. Since Lake Mead is not CAP projected below 1,025 ft, according to the 2007 Interim Guidelines, demand in 2016 under this operational tier annual releases from Lake would include a 320 Powell to Lake Mead will be reduced to 7.48 MAF (for water KAF reduction to year 2014).
    [Show full text]