DOCSLIB.ORG

European Tobacco Control Report 2007 the European Tobacco Control Report 2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
European Tobacco Control Report 2007 the European Tobacco Control Report 2007 EUR/06/5062780 15 January 2007 E89842 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH The European Tobacco Control Report 2007 Control Tobacco The European The European Tobacco Control Report 2007 World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe Scherfigsvej 8 DK-2100 Copenhagen Denmark Tel: +45 39 17 17 17 Fax: +45 39 17 18 18 Telex: 1200 E-mail: [email protected] Web Site: http://www.euro.who.int THE EUROPEAN TOBACCO CONTROL REPORT 2007 ABSTRACT The European tobacco control report describes the tobacco control situation and the status of tobacco control policies in the WHO European Region as at late 2006; reviews progress following the adoption of the European Strategy for Tobacco Control (ESTC) in 2002; and establishes a baseline for monitoring implementation of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) in the Region. The document presents an overview of the situation regarding tobacco use and related harm in the WHO European Region during the period 2002–2006 and of Member States' policy responses and implementation of national tobacco control measures in line with the recommendations of the ESTC. Reference is also made to the status of policies in countries in the light of the specific requirements of the WHO FCTC. Lessons learned and challenges faced during the policy-making process are illustrated by several short national, regional and subregional case studies attached to the Report. Keywords SMOKING – adverse effects – prevention and control HEALTH POLICY HEALTH PROMOTION TOBACCO – legislation TOBACCO INDUSTRY – legislation INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION INTERSECTORAL COOPERATION TREATIES EUROPE ISBN 978-92-890-2193-7 Address requests about publications of the WHO Regional Office for Europe to: Publications WHO Regional Office for Europe Scherfigsvej 8 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the WHO/Europe web site at http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest. © World Health Organization 2007 All rights reserved. The Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Where the designation “country or area” appears in the headings of tables, it covers countries, territories, cities, or areas. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. The World Health Organization does not warrant that the information contained in this publication is complete and correct and shall not be liable for any damages incurred as a result of its use. The views expressed by authors or editors do not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the World Health Organization. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was prepared by the WHO Regional Office for Europe in collaboration with the network of national counterparts for the European Strategy for Tobacco Control whose contributions of data, comments, suggestions and overall guidance were invaluable. The network of national counterparts/alternates included: Roland Shuperka, Albania; Joan Martinez-Benazet, Andorra; Alexander Bazarchyan, Armenia; Alice Schogger, Cornelia Franta, Austria; Nadir Eyvazov, Azad Gajiev, Azerbaijan; Paul van den Meerssche, Belgium; Aida Ramic-Catak, Zivana Gavric, Bosnia and Herzegovina; Andrei Sekach, Belarus; Masha Gavrailova, Bulgaria; Vlasta Hrabak-Zerjavic, Croatia; Charitini Komodiki, Cyprus; Hana Sovinova, Czech Republic; Ulla Skovgaard Danielsen, Denmark; Gaby Kirschbaum, Germany; Andrus Lipand, Estonia; Olli Simonen, Finland; Pascal Melihan-Cheinin, France; Akaki Gamkrelidze, Levan Baramidze, Georgia; Maroulio Lekka, Greece; Tibor Demjen, Hungary; Solveig Gudmundsdottir, Iceland; Marie Killeen, Ireland; Yair Amikam, Israel; Daniela Galeone, Italy; Aigul Tastanova, Kazakhstan; Chinara Bekbasarova, Kyrgyzstan; Gelena Kriveliene, Lithuania; Simone Steil, Luxembourg; Janis Caunitis, Latvia; Mario Spiteri, Anne Buttigieg, Malta; Denis Ravera, Monaco; Agima Ljaljevic, Montenegro; Pieter de Coninck, Netherlands; Rita Lindbak, Norway; Witold Zatonski, Poland; Emilia Nunes, Portugal; Tudor Vasiliev, Liubova Andreeva, Republic of Moldova; Magdalena Ciobanu, Romania; Galina Sakharova, Russian Federation; Davide Rosa, San Marino; Isabel Saiz, Spain; Natasa Lazarevic-Petrovic, Serbia; Elena Kavcova, Slovakia; Tomaz Caks, Slovenia; Margaretha Haglund, Sweden; Patrick Vuillème, Switzerland; Ziyovuddin Avgonov, Tajikistan; Mome Spasovski, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia; Rejep Geldiev, Turkmenistan; Toker Erguder, Turkey; Alla Grygorenko, Ukraine; Nick Adkin, Andrew Black and Tim Roberts, United Kingdom; Shukrat Khashimov, Uzbekistan. Special thanks go to Claude Vilain for data collection and preparing the first draft and Patsy Harrington for cross-checking the data and technical editing. The contributions of Luk Joossens, Stella Bialous, Kerstin Schotte and Rifat Atun in drafting, respectively, the sections on illicit trade, industry tactics, smoking prevalence and the case studies are much appreciated. Kari Paaso and Shubhada Watson provided valuable support in the technical review and Gail Denner in the publishing process. Haik Nikogosian provided overall coordination, review and guidance in the development of the report. Acknowledgements are extended to the committee of experts (Carolyn Dresler, Anna Gilmore, Luk Joossens, Martina Pötschke-Langer and Tibor Szilagyi) for their valuable comments and suggestions during the drafting process. Kathleen Strong and Regina Guthold in WHO headquarters gave important support in the cross-country analysis of smoking prevalence. Valuable comments, data and suggestions on different aspects of the report were received from the Tobacco Free Initiative in WHO headquarters, various WHO Regional Office programmes, the European Commission, the European Network of Quitlines, the WHO collaborating centre in Heidelberg and other colleagues and institutions to whom we extend our sincere thanks and appreciation. Contributions received from the European Commission, national counterparts, experts and institutions and WHO colleagues for the respective case studies deserve special appreciation. Acknowledgements are also extended to Rosemary Bohr for overall editing and layout and Gill Paludan- Müller for preparing the graphic material. The Regional Office is especially grateful to the governments of France and Ireland for hosting the meetings of national counterparts in the process leading to the preparation of the report. CONTENTS Page Summary ........................................................................................................................ 3 Introduction....................................................................................................................... 6 Background ............................................................................................................... 6 Process and data sources ........................................................................................... 8 PART 1 Tobacco consumption and tobacco-related harm................................................ 11 Summary ...................................................................................................................... 12 Prevalence of tobacco use................................................................................................. 12 Smoking prevalence among adults ............................................................................ 12 Smoking prevalence among young people.................................................................. 18 Socioeconomic differences........................................................................................ 21 Tobacco-related harm....................................................................................................... 22 Summary ................................................................................................................ 22 Burden of disease attributable to tobacco use ............................................................ 23 Tobacco-related mortality ......................................................................................... 24 Tobacco-related costs .............................................................................................. 28 PART 2 Tobacco Control Policies................................................................................... 29 Measures to reduce the demand for tobacco products ......................................................... 30 Price and taxation policies ........................................................................................ 30 Exposure to tobacco smoke (passive smoking, environmental tobacco smoke) ............. 36 Advertising, promotion and sponsorship....................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thesis (Complete)
    E VALUATION Invitation to attend the public defence of my doctoral thesis OF SMOKING Evaluation of smoking CESSATION cessation services in disadvantaged areas of SERVICES the Netherlands IN DISADVANTAGED on Friday, 19 February, 2016, at 12.00 noon in AREAS the Agnietenkapel of the University of Amsterdam. OF THE N ETHERLANDS Agnietenkapel Oudezijds Voorburgwal 229-231 1012 EZ Amsterdam You are warmly invited to the reception which will follow the defence. Fiona Benson [email protected] EVALUATION OF SMOKING CESSATION Paranymphs F. E. Benson E. F. SERVICES IN DISADVANTAGED AREAS OF Jizzo Bosdriesz [email protected] THE NETHERLANDS F. E. Benson Anna Font-Gonzalez [email protected] 400350-L-os-Benson Processed on: 12_22_2015 Fiona E. Benson Evaluation of smoking cessation services in disadvantaged areas of the Netherlands 400350-L-bw-Benson © F.E. Benson, 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this thesis may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the written permission of the author. ISBN: 978-94-6259-847-8 Cover design & layout: Heleen de Vos, Persoonlijkproefschrift.nl Printed by: Ipskamp Printing The studies described in this thesis were funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) under grant agreement number: 200120004. One study, described in chapter 5, received two additional sources of funding, which were from the SOPHIE and URBAN40 projects. The SOPHIE project received funding from European Community’s Seventh Framework Program (FP7) under grant agreement number 278173. The URBAN40 project received funding from ZonMw under the grant agreement numbers 121010009.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Correlates of Cigarette Smoking Among
    BMC Public Health BioMed Central Research article Open Access Social correlates of cigarette smoking among Icelandic adolescents: A population-based cross-sectional study Alfgeir L Kristjansson*1,2, Inga D Sigfusdottir1, John P Allegrante1,3 and Asgeir R Helgason1,2,4 Address: 1Centre for Social Research and Analysis, School of Health and Education, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland, 2Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, 3Department of Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers College, and Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA and 4Centre of Public Health, Stockholm, Sweden Email: Alfgeir L Kristjansson* - [email protected]; Inga D Sigfusdottir - [email protected]; John P Allegrante - [email protected]; Asgeir R Helgason - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 7 March 2008 Received: 1 November 2007 Accepted: 7 March 2008 BMC Public Health 2008, 8:86 doi:10.1186/1471-2458-8-86 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/8/86 © 2008 Kristjansson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: Previous research has shown that between 80 and 90 percent of adult smokers report having started smoking before 18 years of age. Several studies have revealed that multiple social factors influence the likelihood of smoking during adolescence, the period during which the onset of smoking usually occurs. To better understand the social mechanisms that influence adolescent smoking, we analyzed the relationship and relative importance of a broad spectrum of social variables in adolescent smoking in Iceland, a Nordic country with high per-capita income.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Report Will Confirm Tomorrow— Support
    MEETING OF THE PARLIAMENT Thursday 30 June 2005 Session 2 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2005. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Licensing Division, Her Majesty‘s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by Astron. CONTENTS Thursday 30 June 2005 Debates Col. BUSINESS MOTION ........................................................................................................................................ 18571 Motion moved—[George Lyon]—and agreed to. George Lyon (Argyll and Bute) (LD) ........................................................................................................ 18571 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (CROSS-CUTTING EXPENDITURE REVIEW) ............................................................. 18572 Motion moved—[Des McNulty]. Des McNulty (Clydebank and Milngavie) (Lab) ....................................................................................... 18572 Jim Mather (Highlands and Islands) (SNP) ............................................................................................. 18576 Mr Ted Brocklebank (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) ................................................................................ 18578 Mr Andrew Arbuckle (Mid Scotland and Fife) (LD) .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Earmarked Tobacco Taxes Lessons Learnt from Nine Countries Earmarked Tobacco Taxes Lessons Learnt from Nine Countries WHO Library Cataloguing-In-Publication Data
    EARMARKED TOBACCO TAXES lessons learnt from nine countries EARMARKED TOBACCO TAXES lessons learnt from nine countries WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Earmarked tobacco taxes: lessons learnt from nine countries. 1.Taxes. 2.Tobacco Industry. 3.Tobacco - economics. 4.Smoking - prevention and control. 5.Lobbying. 6.Healthcare Financing. 7.Case Reports. I.World Health Organization. ISBN978 92 4 151042 4 (NLM classification: WM 290) © World Health Organization 2016 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization are available on the WHO website (http://www.who.int) or can be purchased from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; email: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications –whether for sale or for non-commercial distribution– should be addressed to WHO Press through the WHO website (http://www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/index.html). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted and dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Tobacco Industry in Transition the Tobacco Industry in Transition
    •i_r, _ : #w .1o nt. Md' rYrM$ ! i 1ip1 ' _f awret ysrswldsw ° . :' ! • '; : a 1 : I The Tobacco Industry in Transition The Tobacco Industry in Transition Policies for the 1980s Edited by William R. Finger North Carolina Center for Public Policy Research, Inc. LexingtonBooks D.C. Heath and Company Lexington, Massachusetts Toronto Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: The Tobacco industry in transition. 1. Tobacco manufacture and trade-Government policy-United States. 2. Tobacco manufacture and trade-United States. I. Finger, William R. II. North Carolina Center for Public Policy Research. HD9136.T6 338.1'7371'0973 81-47064 ISBN 0-669-04552-7 AACR2 Copyright © 1981 by North Carolina Center for Public Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmit- ted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Published simultaneously in Canada Printed in the United States of America International Standard Book Number: 0-669-04552-7 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 81-47064 Contents Acknowledgments ix Introduction William R. Finger Xi Part I The Tobacco Program and the Farmer 1 Chapter 1 Early Efforts to Control the Market-And Why They Failed Anthony J. Badger 3 Chapter 2 The Federal Tobacco Program: How It Works and Alternatives for Change Charles Pugh 13 Chapter 3 Landmarks in the Tobacco Program Charles Pugh 31 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • A Smoking Gun:
    Why are tobacco companies allowed to spend $11/2 billion dollars per year to pro­ mote deadly products-with many of their messages intended for children? How can this situation be tolerated? How did it arise? What can we do about it? Can pro­ tection be achieved in a manner compati­ ble with free enterprise and individual freedom? How should the rights of smokers and nonsmokers be balanced? Must nonsmokers subsidize the cost of treating cigarette-induced disease? How much protection should nonsmokers have from drifting cigarette smoke? How can smokers escape from the grip of nicotine addiction and psychological dependence on smoking? Dr. Elizabeth Whelan addresses these and other important questions as she examines how the tobacco industry de­ veloped and thrived during the 20th century, creating an unprecedented chain of economic and physical dependence. She discusses the early launching of the Dr. Elizabeth M. Whelan is Executive Di­ cigarette, its initial rejection by those ac­ rector of the American Council on Science customed to the more "manly" pipe and and Health. She holds advanced degrees in cigar, and finally, its stellar success, result­ epidemiology and public health education ing in large part from an unparalleled from the Yale School of Medicine and the advertising blitz. Harvard School of Public Health, and has In many ways, the cigarette represents written extensively on a variety of topics just plain bad li.ick. By the time that the relating to the environment and public data on cigarette smoking and disease be­ health. Dr. Whelan resides in New York came conclusive in the 1950s, a substan­ City with her husband and daughter.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix VIII - Table 1: Surveys of Adult Tobacco Use in WHO Member States
    WHO REPORT ON THE GLOBAL ToBACCO EPIDEMIC, 2009 APPENDIX VIII - TABLE 1: SURVEYS OF ADULT TOBACCO USE IN WHO MEMBER STATES Globally Africa The Americas South-East Asia Europe Eastern Mediterranean Western Pacific WHO REPORT ON THE GLOBAL TOBACCO EPIDEMIC, 2009 1 COUNTRY TITLE OF SURVEY YEAR REPRESENTA- DEFINITION NO. 1 DEFINITION NO. 2 Table 8.1.0 TIVENESS Surveys of adult tobacco use in WHO DESCRIPTION AGE PREVALENCE DESCRIPTION AGE PREVALENCE GROUP GROUP Member States, globally (YEARS) MALE (%) FEMALE (%) TOTAL (%) (YEARS) MALE (%) FEMALE (%) TOTAL (%) Afghanistan WHO Assignment Afghanistan 1991 Subnational Current tobacco 18+ 82.0 17.0 . Data not reported/not available. Noncommunicable Diseases CVD use Albania Albania Reproductive Health Survey 2002 2002 National Current cigarette Male: 46.3 3.0 . Preliminary Report smoking 15–49; female: 15–44 Algeria Mesure des facteurs de risque des maladies 2003 Subnational Daily tobacco 25–64 32.3 0.4 12.8 Current tobacco 25–64 38.1 0.5 15.1 non transmissibles (approche STEPWISE) dans smoking smoking deux zones pilotes, Setif et Mostaganem Andorra National Health Survey 2002 National Current tobacco 16+ 42.0 30.0 36.0 . smoking Angola . Antigua and Barbuda . Argentina Encuesta Nacional de Factores de Riesgo 2005 National Daily cigarette 18+ 26.2 18.6 22.2 Current cigarette 18+ 35.1 24.9 29.7 smoking smoking Armenia Health Systems Performance Assessment 2007 National Daily tobacco 20–60 55.0 2.0 23.0 . smoking Australia National Drug Strategy Household Survey 2007 National Daily tobacco 14+ 18.0 15.2 16.6 Occasional 14+ 1.4 1.2 1.3 smoking tobacco smoking Austria Österreichweite Repräsentativerhebung zu 2004 National Daily tobacco 14–99 40.2 35.5 .
    [Show full text]
  • Just What the Doctor Ordered?
    iceland-vogel_Layout 1 11-09-19 9:39 AM Page E1045 CMAJ News A pack a day: Just what the doctor ordered? mokers in Iceland may soon need a doctor’s note to light up. SMember of Parliament and for - mer health minister Siv Fridleifsdottir, backed by the country’s medical asso - ciation, will table a private member’s bill in the fall to make cigarettes a pre - scription-only product. Only pharma - cies would be allowed to dispense tobacco products — at first to anyone over 20 and finally only to people with medical certificates. The pitch is part of an ambitious 10- year plan articulated in the bill to ban smoking in all public places, including sidewalks, parks and cars when driving or with children, in a bid to reduce the k visibility and harmful second-hand c o t s k effects of smoking. Under the legisla - n i h T tion, doctors would be compelled to 1 1 0 2 prescribe cigarettes to smokers unwill - ing or unable to quit using cessation © Iceland may soon confine smoking to people’s residences as part of a 10-year plan that programs. would ban smoking in all public places, including sidewalks, parks and cars when dri - “The idea is not to penalize those ving or with children, in a bid to reduce the visibility and harmful second-hand effects of who already smoke, but prevent others, smoking. particularly young people, from mak - ing uninformed choices to pick up the where. But once the prescription sys - hand smoke is not harmful, arguments habit,” explains Fridleifsdottir.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Crisis and Smoking Behaviour: Prospective Cohort Study in Iceland
    Economic crisis and smoking behaviour: prospective cohort study in Iceland The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation McClure, Christopher Bruce, Unnur A Valdimarsdóttir, Arna Hauksdóttir, and Ichiro Kawachi. 2012. Economic crisis and smoking behaviour: prospective cohort study in Iceland. BMJ Open 2(5): e001386. Published Version doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001386 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10579571 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Open Access Research Economic crisis and smoking behaviour: prospective cohort study in Iceland Christopher Bruce McClure,1,3 Unnur A Valdimarsdóttir,1 Arna Hauksdóttir,1 Ichiro Kawachi2 To cite: McClure CB, ABSTRACT ARTICLE SUMMARY Valdimarsdóttir UA, Objective: To examine the associations between the Hauksdóttir A, et al. 2008 economic collapse in Iceland and smoking Economic crisis and smoking Article focus behaviour at the national and individual levels. behaviour: prospective cohort ▪ An examination on the association between eco- study in Iceland. BMJ Open Design: A population-based, prospective cohort study nomic crises and smoking behaviours, that is, is 2012;2:e001386. based on a mail survey (Health and Wellbeing in change in income (at both the national and indi- doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012- Iceland) assessed in 2007 and 2009. vidual levels) related to a change in smoking 001386 Setting: National mail survey.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pack a Day: Just What the Doctor Ordered?
    Early release, published at www.cmaj.ca on September 6, 2011. Subject to revision. CMAJ News August 30, 2011 A pack a day: just what the doctor ordered? Smokers in Iceland may soon need a doctor’s note to light up. Member of Parliament and former health minister Siv Fridleifsdottir, backed by the country’s medical association, will table a private member’s bill in the fall to make cigarettes a prescription-only product. Only pharmacies would be allowed to dispense tobacco products — at first to anyone over 20 and finally only to people with medical certificates. The pitch is part of an ambitious 10-year plan articulated in the bill to ban smoking in all public places, including sidewalks, parks and cars when driving or with children, in a bid to reduce the visibility and harmful second-hand effects of smoking. Under the legislation, doctors would be compelled to prescribe cigarettes to smokers unwilling or unable to quit using cessation programs. “The idea is not to penalize those who already smoke, but prevent others, particularly young people, from making uninformed choices to pick up the habit,” explains Fridleifsdottir. Iceland has one of the lowest rates of smoking in Europe at about 15%, largely because of other progressive anti-smoking policies adopted in the past, but the rate is higher among young Icelanders at 20%. “Every year 700 young people start smoking in Iceland, and about half will die prematurely from diseases related to that addiction,” Fridleifsdottir says. “With all that we know today about how harmful it is to smoke, it is ethical and right to take radical steps to try and prevent children from starting to smoke.” The proposed legislation would see tobacco and nicotine designated as addictive drugs, while second-hand smoke would be controlled like other carcinogenic substances.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Crisis and Smoking Behaviour: Prospective Cohort Study in Iceland
    Open Access Research BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001386 on 8 October 2012. Downloaded from Economic crisis and smoking behaviour: prospective cohort study in Iceland Christopher Bruce McClure,1,3 Unnur A Valdimarsdóttir,1 Arna Hauksdóttir,1 Ichiro Kawachi2 To cite: McClure CB, ABSTRACT ARTICLE SUMMARY Valdimarsdóttir UA, Objective: To examine the associations between the Hauksdóttir A, et al. 2008 economic collapse in Iceland and smoking Economic crisis and smoking Article focus behaviour at the national and individual levels. behaviour: prospective cohort ▪ An examination on the association between eco- study in Iceland. BMJ Open Design: A population-based, prospective cohort study nomic crises and smoking behaviours, that is, is 2012;2:e001386. based on a mail survey (Health and Wellbeing in change in income (at both the national and indi- doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012- Iceland) assessed in 2007 and 2009. vidual levels) related to a change in smoking 001386 Setting: National mail survey. status? Participants: Representative cohort (n=3755) of Key messages ▸ Prepublication history and Icelandic adults. ▪ National smoking prevalence declined in Iceland additional material for this Main outcome measure: Smoking status. paper are available online. To following the 2008 economic crisis. Results: A significant reduction in the prevalence of ▪ In individual-level analysis, male former smokers view these files please visit smoking was observed from 2007 (pre-economic the journal online whose incomes declined experienced a reduced collapse) to 2009 (postcollapse) in both males (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ risk of smoking relapse. – – bmjopen-2012-001386). (17.4 14.8%; p 0.01) and females (20.0 17.5%; p ▪ Conversely, an increase in income from 2007 to 0.01) in the cohort (n=3755).
    [Show full text]
  • Socioeconomic Inequalities in Smoking in the Netherlands Before and During the Global Financial Crisis: a Repeated Cross- Sectional Study
    Chapter 5 Socioeconomic inequalities in smoking in The Netherlands before and during the Global Financial Crisis: a repeated cross- sectional study. Based on: Benson FE, Kuipers MAG, Nierkens V, Bruggink JW, Stronks K, Kunst AE. Socioeconomic inequalities in smoking in The Netherlands before and during the Global Financial Crisis: a repeated cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:469 doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1782-6. 400350-L-bw-Benson Part 2 ABSTRACT Background. The Global Financial Crisis (GFC) increased levels of financial strain, especially in those of low socioeconomic status (SES). Financial strain can affect smoking behaviour. This study examines socioeconomic inequalities in current smoking and smoking cessation in The Netherlands before and during the Global Financial Crisis. Methods. Participants were 66,960 Dutch adults (≥18 years) who took part in the annual national Health Survey (2004-2011). Period was dichotomised: ‘pre-‘ and ‘during-GFC’. SES measures used were income, education and neighbourhood deprivation. Outcomes were current smoking rates (smokers/total population) and smoking cessation ratios (former smokers/ever smokers). Multilevel logistic regression models controlled for individual characteristics and tested for interaction between period and SES. Results. In both periods, high SES respondents (in all indicators) had lower current smoking levels and higher cessation ratios than those of middle or low SES. Inequalities in current smoking increased significantly in poorly educated adults of 45-64 years of age (Odds Ratio (OR) low educational level compared with high: 2.00[1.79-2.23] compared to pre-GFC 1.67[1.50-1.86], p for interaction=0.02).
    [Show full text]