• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Octdber 1976 DA PAMPHLET 27-50-46 HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, WASHINGTbN, D.C. Field Defense Services The foU0win.g letter is from The Judge Advocate Gemrat. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY are encouraged first to seek solutions to all OFFICE OF matters through the defense organization. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Further amplification of defense counsel rela- WASHINGTON, D.C. 20310 tionships and training may be found in BG 7 September 1976 Coggins' letter of 25 April 1975 to all defense counsel, and my letter-of 25 July 1975 to staff DAJA-ZA judge advocates, both to be reprinted shortly in The AmyLawyer. SUBJECT : Field Defense Services 3. Proper utilization of this organization re- T0:ALLSTAFF JUDGE ADVOCATES quires complete understanding of its structure 1. One of our most important responsibilities and capabilities. The cornerstone of this chain is to insure that each soldier accused of an is the general court-martial jurisdiction senior offense under the Code is provided the best defense counsel. He is the major point of co- possible defense services. The heart of defense ordination between trial defense counsel and services lies in the quality and effectiveness of the staff judge advocate. His major responsi- trial representation. Although we can take bilities ,are : pride in our defense services, there remains a. Receiving and resolving what he deems room for improvement. This is particularly to be valid complaints from subordinate de- true with regard to providing field defense fense counsel or referring those complaints to counsel with assistance and a program of con- appropriate military authority. Resolving any tinued professional development. Accordingly, differences between office defense counsel and the purpose of this letter is to announce the the staff judge advocate either by direct com- creation of the Field Defense Services Office, munication with him or up the defense chain. designed to fulfill this need, and to explain b. Receiving and taking appropriate action how it will function in relationship to our total on complainta from defense related personnel defense system. against defense counsel, e.g., clients, parents, relatives, and civilian attorneys. 2. My chief advisor in matters regarding the defense function is The Assistant Judge Advo- c. Serving as a consultant, on request, to cate General for Civil Law (AJAG/CL). He all subordinate counsel on trial tactics and executes this responsibility through the de- potential problems, and monitoring individual fense organization, which includes the new counsel skill levels to insure that they possess Field Defense Service Office-Defense Appel- that skill requisite for case assignments. late Division (FDS), Major Command (MA- d. Monitoring and resolving deficiencies in COM) senior defense counsel and installation the separatkness and adequacy of subordinate senior defense counsel. For this reason, al- counsel offices, and administrative and logisti- though subordinate counsel are authorized cal support. direct communication with AJAG/CL, they e. Administrative supervision of all instal- DA Pam 27-50-46 I lation defense counsel and their activities, including case assignments ; determination of the availability of individual requested coun- sel; rating subordinate counsel, and the pre- sentation of defense.policy problems. This list is not intended as all inclusive, and I emphasize that effective and imaginative implementation of this role will result in better service to the client and the Corps. I 4. The MACOM senior defense counsel is the point of contact for matters relating primarily to command aspects, such as complaints against SJA’s and the adequacy of support, when such matters cannot be solved locally and must be referred to a higher command level. 6. In order to make the defense chain more responsive to the needs of defense counsel, I have directed the creation of a separate field defense services office, (FDS), within the De- fense Appellate Division, to operate under the auspices of AJAGKL. That ofice will be e- operational on l October 1976 and will provide the following services : a. Ethics guidance and trial tactics advice. It will provide telephonic or written guidance and/or research assistance to specific field in- quiries in time for use at trial. b. Preparation of The Advocate and other periodic communications, to insure distribu- tion of new defense developments. c. In coordination with TJAGSA, present instruction on defense matters at the basic course and at a new semiannual continuing legal education course for defense counsel. Additionally, they will coordinate periodic re- gional defense counsel seminars, which will The Army Lawyer is published monthly by the Judge stress the practical application of changes in Advocate General’s School. By-lined articles represent HQDA policy, military and other criminal the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily re- judicial developments, the solutions to recur- flect the views of The Judge Advocate General or the ring field problems, trial tactics, and the de- Department of the Army. Manuscript on topics of in- fense role in pre-trial and post-trial levels. terest b military lawyers are invited to: Editor, The Army Lawyer, The Judge Advocate General’s School, d. Periodic visits with field defense counsel Charlottasville, Virginia 22901. Manuscripts will be to insure two-way communication and per- returned only upon specific request. No compensation sonal professional contact within the defense can be paid to authors for articles published. Funds for printing this publication were approved by Head- organization, and to evaluate our system of quarters, Department of the Army, 26 May 1971. defense services. DA Pam 2760-46 3 6. I stress that this new cffice is to aid the personal contact. Each major command over- field and to react to problems as they arise. seas should task ita senior defense counsel to It will not unilaterally initiate contact with assume these functions in coordination with the field to create appellate issues, nor other- FDS. wise involve itself in your jurisdictions. An 8. We have outstanding defense services to- Army Lawyer article will present the defense day. I am confident that with your support and structure in more detail in the near future. enthusiastic implementation of the complete I commend it to your reading and study. The defense organization, our service will be sig- two Defense Advocacy Courses are sched- first nificantly better in the future. As always, your uled for 26-29 October 1976 and 18-21 April comments and suggestions are welcome. 1977. You should insure that your defense counsel and prospective defense counsel take advantage of these courses. WILTON B. PERSONS, JR. 7. In overseas commands, it would be difficult Major General, USA for FDS to perform those functions requiring The Judge Advocate General The materiala mentioned in The Judge Advocate General‘s letter are printed below. FIELD DEFENSE SERVICES OFFICE The Judge Advocate General has always (FDS) is to provide a source of defense emphasized the importance of improving the oriented assistance beyond that inherent in representation of accused before courta-mar- the roles of the installation senior defense tial. With this in mind, BG Coggins in his counsel and the MACOM senior defense coun- letter to “all defense counsel”, dated 26 April sel, as those roles are currently defined. Pursu- 1975, “highlighted” the structure and the role ant to TJAG’s direction the five major compo- of the informal defense counsel chain existing nents of the FDS mission are : within the Corps (Reprinted Appendix A). (1) to monitor and train defense counsel; Later, to stress another area for improvement (2) to monitor defense representation for in- in the provision of defense services, MG Per- adequate or improper practice; (3)’ to insure sons in his letter of 23 July 1976 delineated timely distribution of information and pro- the necessary training and evaluation respon- mote the interchange of ideas between defense sibilities of staff judge advocates toward their counsel: (4) to. respond to inquiries, com- trial defense counsel (Reprinted Appendix B). plaints, and requests for assistance from the Further study revealed that the informal de- field with emphasis on ethics and trial tactics ; fense organization as previously existing was and (6) to plan future improvements in de- not entirely responsive to the needs of defense fense services. The FDS will not become in- counsel. As a result, The Judge Advocate Gen- volved in trials or otherwise try to develop eral directed that a separate field defense appellate issues. Further, FDS will not inter- services office be established within the De- fere with the staff judge advocates in the fense Appellate Division (DAD). This new operation of their jurisdictions. The FDS goal organization will be operational by 1 October will be to improve the quality of defense 1976. In order to insure maximum utilization services. of this vital new link in the defense chain, it The mission will be accomplished by field is essential that the Corps be fully aware of visits, instructional training, written guid- the services this office provides, how it is ance, and direct consultation with defense organized to provide them, and what quality counsel in the field. of response can be expected. Periodic visits will be made to field defense The mission of Field Defense Services Office offices to evaluate defense services and to DA Pam 27-50-46 4 insure proper utilization of the defense orga- ented continuing legal education for field nization. These visits will also insure personal counsel. They also will help alleviate the im- professional contact between FDS and field pact of the shortage of experienced defense defense counsel. This communication should attorneys. All jurisdictions will share the help identify, avoid, or resolve potential prob- benefit of experienced counsel. lem areas. The FDS will produce and distribute de- The FDS will monitor training of defense fense oriented publications, including The counsel.

Load more

  36

Copy Link