Transmission Electron Microscopy a Textbook for Materials Science Transmission Electron Microscopy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Transmission Electron Microscopy a Textbook for Materials Science Transmission Electron Microscopy Transmission Electron Microscopy A Textbook for Materials Science Transmission Electron Microscopy A Textbook for Materials Science David B. Williams Lehigh University Bethlehem, Pennsylvania and C. Barry Carter University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota Springer Science+Business Media, LLC Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Williams, David B. (David Bemard), 1949- 1i'ansmission electron microscopy: a textbook for materials science I David B. WIiliams and C. Barry Carter. p. cm. Includes bibliographica1 references and index. ISBN 978-0-306-45324-3 ISBN 978-1-4757-2519-3 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-2519-3 1. Materials-Microscopy. 2. 1i'ansmission electron microscopy. 1. Carter, C. Barry. II. Ti­ tie. TA417.23.W56 1996 96-28435 502'.8'25~c20 CIP ISBN 978-0-306-45324-3 © 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York Originally published by Plenum Press, New York in 1996 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1996 109876543 AII rights reserved No part 01 this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any lorm or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microlilming, recording, or otherwise, without written permission Irom the Publisher To our parents, Walter Dennis and Mary Isabel Carter, and Joseph and Catherine Williams, who made everything possible Foreword Electron microscopy has revolutionized our understanding the extraordinary intellectual demands required of the mi­ of materials by completing the processing-structure-prop­ croscopist in order to do the job properly: crystallography, erties links down to atomistic levels. It now is even possible diffraction, image contrast, inelastic scattering events, and to tailor the microstructure (and meso structure ) of materials spectroscopy. Remember, these used to be fields in them­ to achieve specific sets of properties; the extraordinary abili­ selves. Today, one has to understand the fundamentals ties of modem transmission electron microscopy-TEM­ of all of these areas before one can hope to tackle signifi­ instruments to provide almost all of the structural, phase, cant problems in materials science. TEM is a technique of and crystallographic data allow us to accomplish this feat. characterizing materials down to the atomic limits. It must Therefore, it is obvious that any curriculum in modem mate­ be used with care and attention, in many cases involving rials education must include suitable courses in electron mi­ teams of experts from different venues. The fundamentals croscopy. It is also essential that suitable texts be available are, of course, based in physics, so aspiring materials sci­ for the preparation of the students and researchers who must entists would be well advised to have prior exposure to, for carry out electron microscopy properly and quantitatively. example, solid-state physics, crystallography, and crystal The 40 chapters of this new text by Barry Carter defects, as well as a basic understanding of materials sci­ and David Williams (like many of us, well schooled in mi­ ence, for without the latter how can a person see where croscopy at Cambridge and Oxford) do just that. If you TEM can (or may) be put to best use? want to learn about electron microscopy from specimen So much for the philosophy. This fine new book preparation (the ultimate limitation); or via the instrument; definitely fills a gap. It provides a sound basis for research or how to use TEM correctly to perform imaging, diffrac­ workers and graduate students interested in exploring tion, and spectroscopy-it's all there! This is, to my those aspects of structure, especially defects, that control knowledge, the only complete text now available that in­ properties. Even undergraduates are now expected (and cludes all the remarkable advances made in the field of rightly) to know the basis for electron microscopy, and this TEM in the past 30 to 40 years. The timing for this book is book, or appropriate parts of it, can also be utilized for un­ just right and, personally, it is exciting to have been part of dergraduate curricula in science and engineering. the developments it covers-developments that have im­ The authors can be proud of an enormous task, very pacted so heavily on materials science. well done. In case there are people out there who still think TEM is just taking pretty pictures to fill up one's bibliogra­ G. Thomas phy, please stop, pause, take a look at this book, and digest Berkeley; California vii Preface How is this book any different from the many other books than annular dark-field imaging-or even secondary-elec­ that deal with TEM? It has several unique features, but the tron or STEM Z-contrast modes. Similarly, convergent­ most distinguishing one, we believe, is that it can really be beam and scanning-beam diffraction are integral parts of described as a "textbook"-that is, one designed to be used electron diffraction, and are complementary to selected­ primarily in the classroom rather than in the research labo­ area diffraction. Inelastic electron scattering is the source ratory. We have constructed the book as a series of rela­ of both Kikuchi lines and characteristic X-rays. So we tively small chapters (with a few notable exceptions!). The don't deliberately split off "conventional" microscopy contents of many chapters can be covered in a typical lec­ from "analytical" microscopy. ture of 50 to 75 minutes. The style is informal for easier Our approach is to thread two fundamental ques­ reading; it resembles an oral lecture rather than the formal tions throughout the text. writing you would encounter when reading research papers. Why should we use a particular technique? In our experience, the TEM books currently avail­ How do we put the idea into practice? able fall into three major categories. They may be too theo­ We attempt to establish a sound theoretical basis where retical for many materials science students; they attempt to necessary, although not always giving all the details. We cover all kinds of electron microscopy in one volume, then use this knowledge to build a solid understanding of which makes it difficult to include sufficient theory on any how we use the instrument. The text is illustrated with ex­ one technique; or they are limited in the TEM topics they amples from across the fields of materials science and en­ cover. The rapid development of the TEM field has meant gineering and, where possible, a sense of the history of the that many of the earlier books must automatically be placed technique is introduced. We keep references to a minimum in the third category. Although these books are often invalu­ and generally accepted concepts are not specifically cred­ able in teaching, we have not found them generally suitable ited, although numerous classical general references are as the course textbook in a senior-year undergraduate or included. first-year graduate course introducing TEM, so we have en­ We both have extensive teaching and research back­ deavored to fill this perceived gap. grounds in all aspects of TEM comprising diffraction, Since this text is an introduction to the whole sub­ imaging, and microanalysis. Our research in TEM of mate­ ject of TEM, we incorporate all aspects of a modem TEM rials spans metals, ceramics, composites, and semiconduc­ into an integrated whole. So, rather than separating out the tors. We each bring more than 25 years of TEM experience broad-beam and convergent-beam aspects of the subject to the book, and have contributed to the training of a gener­ (the traditional structural analysis or imaging versus the ation of (we hope) skilled electron microscopists. We found "chemical" analysis or "new" techniques), we treat these that writing the book broadened our own knowledge con­ two aspects as different sides of the same coin. Thus scan­ siderably and was actually fun on some occasions. We hope ning-beam (STEM) imaging is just another way to form an you experience the same reactions after reading it. image in a TEM. There is no reason to regard "conven­ Lastly, we encourage you to send us any comments tional" bright-field and "conventional" dark-field imaging (positive or negative). We can both be reached by email: as any more fundamental ways of imaging the specimen dbwl @lehigh.edu and [email protected] ix Acknowledgments We have spent the best part of a decade in the conception this support none of the research that underpins the con­ and gestation of this text and such an endeavor can't be ac­ tents of this book would have been accomplished. In par­ complished in isolation. Our first acknowledgments must ticular, DBW wishes to acknowledge the National Science be to our wives, Margie and Bryony, and our families, who Foundation (Division of Materials Research) for almost have borne the brunt of our absences from home (and occa­ 20 years of continuous funding, the National Aeronautics sionally the brunt of our presence, also!). and Space Administration, the Department of Energy (Ba­ We have both been fortunate to work with other mi­ sic Energy Sciences), Sandia National Laboratories, and croscopists, post-doctoral associates, and graduate students the Materials Research Center at Lehigh, which supports who have taught us much and contributed significantly to the microscopy laboratory. Portions of the text were writ­ the examples in the text. We would like to thank a few of ten while DBW was on sabbatical or during extended visits these colleagues directly: Dave Ackland, Ian Anderson, to Chalmers University, Goteborg, with Gordon Dunlop Charlie Betz, John Bruley, Dov Cohen, Ray Coles, Vinayak and Hans Norden; the Max Planck Institut fUr Metall­ Dravid, Joe Goldstein, Brian Hebert, Jason Heffelfinger, forschung, Stuttgart, with Manfred Ruhle; and Los Alamos John Hunt, Matt Johnson, Vicki Keast, Ron Liu, Charlie National Laboratory, with Terry Mitchell.
Recommended publications
  • Automated Crystal Orientation Mapping by Precession Electron
    Microscopy and Microanalysis (2021), 27, 1102–1112 doi:10.1017/S1431927621012538 Original Article Automated Crystal Orientation Mapping by Precession Electron Diffraction-Assisted Four-Dimensional Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy Using a Scintillator-Based CMOS Detector Jiwon Jeong* , Niels Cautaerts, Gerhard Dehm and Christian H. Liebscher Max-Planck Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH, Düsseldorf 40237, Germany Abstract The recent development of electron-sensitive and pixelated detectors has attracted the use of four-dimensional scanning transmission elec- tron microscopy (4D-STEM). Here, we present a precession electron diffraction-assisted 4D-STEM technique for automated orientation mapping using diffraction spot patterns directly captured by an in-column scintillator-based complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) detector. We compare the results to a conventional approach, which utilizes a fluorescent screen filmed by an external charge charge-coupled device camera. The high-dynamic range and signal-to-noise characteristics of the detector greatly improve the image quality of the diffraction patterns, especially the visibility of diffraction spots at high scattering angles. In the orientation maps reconstructed via the template matching process, the CMOS data yield a significant reduction of false indexing and higher reliability compared to the conven- tional approach. The angular resolution of misorientation measurement could also be improved by masking reflections close to the direct beam. This is because the orientation sensitive, weak, and small diffraction spots at high scattering angles are more significant. The results show that fine details, such as nanograins, nanotwins, and sub-grain boundaries, can be resolved with a sub-degree angular resolution which is comparable to orientation mapping using Kikuchi diffraction patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Nanocrystal Orientation and Phase Mapping in the Transmission Electron Microscope on the Basis of Precession Electron Diffraction
    Portland State University PDXScholar Physics Faculty Publications and Presentations Physics 3-2010 Automated Nanocrystal Orientation and Phase Mapping in the Transmission Electron Microscope on the Basis of Precession Electron Diffraction Edgar F. Rauch SIMAP/GPM2 Laboratory Joaquin Portillo NanoMEGAS SPRL Stavros Nicolopoulos NanoMEGAS SPRL Daniel Bultreys NanoMEGAS SPRL Sergei Rouvimov SERVEIS Cientificotecnics Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/phy_fac See P nextart of page the forNanoscience additional andauthors Nanotechnology Commons, and the Physics Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Rauch, Edgar F., et al. "Automated nanocrystal orientation and phase mapping in the transmission electron microscope on the basis of precession electron diffraction." Zeitschrift für Kristallographie International journal for structural, physical, and chemical aspects of crystalline materials 225.2-3 (2010): 103-109. This Article is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Physics Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Authors Edgar F. Rauch, Joaquin Portillo, Stavros Nicolopoulos, Daniel Bultreys, Sergei Rouvimov, and Peter Moeck This article is available at PDXScholar: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/phy_fac/225 Z. Kristallogr. 225 (2010) 103–109 / DOI 10.1524/zkri.2010.1205 103 # by Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag,
    [Show full text]
  • Present State of Electron Backscatter Diffraction and Prospective Developments
    Chapter 1 Present State of Electron Backscatter Diffraction and Prospective Developments Robert A. Schwarzer, David P. Field, Brent L. Adams, Mukul Kumar, and Adam J. Schwartz 1.1 Introduction terns were discussed (Nishikawa and Kikuchi 1928). The researchers placed a recording film to capture the pattern in transmission, and then placed a film in Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), when front of the specimen so as to obtain an image from employed as an additional characterization technique backscattered electrons. This technique was discussed to a scanning electron microscope (SEM), enables in detail by Alam, Blackman, and Pashley in 1954 individual grain orientations, local texture, point-to- (Alam et al. 1954) and later investigated by Venables point orientation correlations, and phase identification and co-workers (Venables and Harland 1973; Venables and distributions to be determined routinely on and Bin-Jaya 1977). The early literature dubbed the the surfaces of bulk polycrystals. The application technique high-angle Kikuchi diffraction and it has has experienced rapid acceptance in metallurgical, been referred to by several additional acronyms in the materials, and geophysical laboratories within the past two decades. Those that are most notable, other past decade (Schwartz et al. 2000) due to the wide than EBSD, include the more accurate nomenclature of availability of SEMs, the ease of sample preparation backscatter Kikuchi diffraction (BKD) or backscatter from the bulk, the high speed of data acquisition, and electron Kikuchi
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Automated Reconstruction of Spherical Kikuchi Maps Chaoyi
    Automated Reconstruction of Spherical Kikuchi Maps Chaoyi Zhu1, Kevin Kaufmann2, Kenneth Vecchio1,2,* 1Materials Science and Engineering Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA 2Department of NanoEngineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA Abstract An automated approach to reconstruct spherical Kikuchi maps from experimentally collected electron backscatter diffraction patterns and overlay each pattern onto its corresponding position on a simulated Kikuchi sphere is presented in this study. This work demonstrates the feasibility of warping any Kikuchi pattern onto its corresponding location of a simulated Kikuchi sphere and reconstructing a spherical Kikuchi map of a known phase based on any set of experimental patterns. This method consists of the following steps after pattern collection: 1) pattern selection based on multiple threshold values; 2) extraction of multiple scan parameters and phase information; 3) generation of a kinematically simulated Kikuchi sphere as the ‘skeleton’ of the spherical Kikuchi map; and 4) overlaying the inverse gnomonic projection of multiple selected patterns after appropriate pattern center calibration and refinement. In the case study of pure aluminum, up to 90% of the Kikuchi sphere could be reconstructed with just seven experimentally collected patterns. The proposed method is the first automated approach to reconstructing spherical Kikuchi maps from experimental Kikuchi patterns. It potentially enables 1 more accurate orientation calculation, new pattern center refinement methods, improved dictionary-based pattern matching, and phase identification in the future. Keywords: electron diffraction, SEM, EBSD, Kikuchi band, spherical Kikuchi map, automated reconstruction, kinematic Kikuchi sphere simulation, inverse gnomonic projection 1. Introduction Diffraction-based characterization techniques have been widely adopted to probe many aspects of structure and properties of materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Crystal Orientation Mapping by Precession Electron Diffraction Assisted Four-Dimensional Scanning Transmission Electron
    Automated crystal orientation mapping by precession electron diffraction assisted four-dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy (4D-STEM) using a scintillator based CMOS detector Jiwon Jeong*, Niels Cautaerts, Gerhard Dehm and Christian H. Liebscher Department of Structure and Nano-/Micromechanics of Materials, Max-Planck Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH, Düsseldorf, 40237, Germany * Corresponding Author: [email protected] Abstract The recent development of electron sensitive and pixelated detectors has attracted the use of four-dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy (4D-STEM). Here, we present a precession electron diffraction assisted 4D-STEM technique for automated orientation mapping using diffraction spot patterns directly captured by an in-column scintillator based complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) detector. We compare the results to a conventional approach, which utilizes a fluorescent screen filmed by an external CCD camera. The high dynamic range and signal-to-noise characteristics of the detector largely improve the image quality of the diffraction patterns, especially the visibility of diffraction spots at high scattering angles. In the orientation maps reconstructed via the template matching process, the CMOS data yields a significant reduction of false indexing and higher reliability compared to the conventional approach. The angular resolution of misorientation measurement could also be improved by masking reflections close to the direct beam. This is because the orientation sensitive, weak and small diffraction spots at high scattering angle are more significant. The results show that fine details such as nanograins, nanotwins and sub-grain boundaries can be 1 resolved with a sub-degree angular resolution which is comparable to orientation mapping using Kikuchi diffraction patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Depth-Resolved Kikuchi Pattern Simulation for Electron Backscatter Diffraction
    Journal of Microscopy, Vol. 239, Pt 1 2010, pp. 32–45 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03353.x Received 1 April 2009; accepted 29 October 2009 Principles of depth-resolved Kikuchi pattern simulation for electron backscatter diffraction A. WINKELMANN Max-Planck-Institut fur¨ Mikrostrukturphysik, Halle (Saale), Germany Key words. Electron backscatter diffraction, Kikuchi pattern, convergent beam electron diffraction, dynamical electron diffraction Summary created by independent sources emitting divergent electron waves from within the crystal (Cowley, 1995). Kikuchi This paper presents a tutorial discussion of the principles patterns also appear in the scanning electron microscope underlying the depth-dependent Kikuchi pattern formation of when the angular distribution of backscattered electrons backscattered electrons in the scanning electron microscope. is imaged. Around this principle, the method of electron To illustrate the connections between various electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) has been developed (Schwarzer, diffractionmethods,theformationofKikuchibandsinelectron 1997; Wilkinson & Hirsch, 1997; Schwartz et al., 2000; backscatter diffraction in the scanning electron microscope Dingley, 2004; Randle, 2008). Because the Kikuchi patterns and in transmission electron microscopy are compared are tied to the local crystallographic structure in the probe with the help of simulations employing the dynamical area of the electron beam, EBSD can provide important theory of electron diffraction. The close relationship between crystallographicandphaseinformationdowntothenanoscale backscattered electron diffraction and convergent beam in materials science (Small & Michael, 2001; Small et al., electron diffraction is illuminated by showing how both effects 2002). The success of EBSD stems from the fact that the can be calculated within the same theoretical framework. method is conceptually simple: in principle only a phosphor The influence of the depth-dependence of diffuse electron screen imaged by a sensitive CCD camera is needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Nanocrystal Orientation and Phase Mapping in the Transmission Electron Microscope on the Basis of Precession Electron Diffraction
    Z. Kristallogr. 225 (2010) 103–109 / DOI 10.1524/zkri.2010.1205 103 # by Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, Mu¨nchen Automated nanocrystal orientation and phase mapping in the transmission electron microscope on the basis of precession electron diffraction Edgar F. Rauch*,I, Joaquin PortilloII, III, Stavros NicolopoulosII, Daniel BultreysII, Sergei RouvimovIII and Peter MoeckIV I SIMAP/GPM2 laboratory, CNRS-Grenoble INP, BP 46 101 rue de la Physique, 38402 Saint Martin d’He`res, France II NanoMEGAS SPRL, Boulevard Edmond Machterns No 79, Saint Jean Molenbeek, Brussels, 1080, Belgium III SERVEIS Cientificotecnics, University of Barcelona, Spain IV Nano-Crystallography Group, Department of Physics, Portland State University, and Oregon Nanoscience and Microtechnologies Institute Portland, OR 97207-0751, USA Received July 4, 2009; accepted November 13, 2009 Nanocrystals / Orientation mapping / Structural mapping / On the other hand, there is a growing need to charac- Structural fingerprinting / Structural databases / terize, map and fingerprint nanocrystalline materials at Precession electron diffraction / higher resolutions as obtainable in a transmission electron Transmission electron microscopy microscope (TEM). Consequently, the extension of orien- tation mapping facilities to transmission electron micro- Abstract. An automated technique for the mapping of na- scopes (TEM) was attempted several times. Both Kikuchi nocrystal phases and orientations in a transmission electron lines [1–3] and Bragg diffraction (spot) patterns [2, 4] microscope is described. It is primarily based on the pro- were used to extract the orientation and phase information jected reciprocal lattice geometry that is extracted from elec- from the patterns. Such techniques have become more fea- tron diffraction spot patterns. Precession electron diffraction sible due to the availability of focused ion beam (FIB) patterns are especially useful for this purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • The Application of Electron Backscatter Diffraction and Orientation Contrast Imaging in the SEM to Textural Problems in Rocks
    American Mineralogist, Volume 84, pages 1741–1759, 1999 The application of electron backscatter diffraction and orientation contrast imaging in the SEM to textural problems in rocks DAVID J. PRIOR,1,* ALAN P. BOYLE,1 FRANK BRENKER,2 MICHAEL C. CHEADLE,1 AUSTIN DAY,3 GLORIA LOPEZ,4 LUCA PERUZZO,6 GRAHAM J. POTTS,1 STEVE REDDY,5 RICHARD SPIESS,6 NICK E. TIMMS,7 PAT TRIMBY,8 JOHN WHEELER,1 AND LENA ZETTERSTRÖM9 1Department of Earth Sciences, Liverpool University, L69 3BX, U.K. 2Institut für Mineralogie und Geochemie, Universität zu Köln, Zülpicher Strasse 49b, 50674 Köln, Germany 3HKL technology, Blåkildevej 17k, 9500 Hobro, Denmark 4Departamento de Geología, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile 5Tectonics Special Research Centre, School of Applied Geology, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, WA 6102, Australia 6Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, University of Padua, Italy 7Department of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia 8Department of Geology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands 9Laboratory for Isotope Geology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden ABSTRACT In a scanning electron microscope (SEM) an electron beam sets up an omni-directional source of scattered electrons within a specimen. Diffraction of these electrons will occur simultaneously on all lattice planes in the sample and the backscattered electrons (BSE), which escape from the specimen, will form a diffraction pattern that can be imaged on a phosphor screen. This is the basis of electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). Similar diffraction effects cause individual grains of different orien- tations to give different total BSE. SEM images that exploit this effect will show orientation contrast (OC). EBSD and OC imaging are SEM-based crystallographic tools.
    [Show full text]
  • Paradigm Shift in Electron-Based Crystallography Via Machine Learning
    Paradigm shift in electron-based crystallography via machine learning Kevin Kaufmann1, Chaoyi Zhu2*, Alexander S. Rosengarten1*, Daniel Maryanovsky3, Tyler J. Harrington2, Eduardo Marin1, and Kenneth S. Vecchio1,2 1Department of NanoEngineering, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA 2Materials Science and Engineering Program, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA 3Department of Cognitive Science, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA *These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract Accurately determining the crystallographic structure of a material, organic or inorganic, is a critical primary step in material development and analysis. The most common practices involve analysis of diffraction patterns produced in laboratory X-ray diffractometers, transmission electron microscopes, and synchrotron X-ray sources. However, these techniques are slow, require careful sample preparation, can be difficult to access, and are prone to human error during analysis. This paper presents a newly developed methodology that represents a paradigm change in electron diffraction-based structure analysis techniques, with the potential to revolutionize multiple crystallography-related fields. A machine learning-based approach for rapid and autonomous identification of the crystal structure of metals and alloys, ceramics, and geological specimens, without any prior knowledge of the sample, is presented and demonstrated utilizing the electron backscatter diffraction technique. Electron backscatter diffraction patterns are collected from materials with well-known crystal structures, then a deep neural network model is constructed for classification to a specific Bravais lattice or point group. The applicability of this approach is evaluated on diffraction patterns from samples unknown to the computer without any human input or data filtering. This is in comparison to traditional Hough transform electron backscatter diffraction, which requires that you have already determined the phases present in your sample.
    [Show full text]