DOCSLIB.ORG

Hispeedmix.Pdf (Final Report)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hispeedmix.Pdf (Final Report) 'HOLYHUDEOH³'´ )LQDO5HSRUW IRU3XEOLFDWLRQ 6WDWXV5 +,63(('0,;352-(&7 ´+LJK6SHHG)UHLJKW RQWKH(XURSHDQ+LJK6SHHG5DLOZD\1HWZRUNµ contract n. RA-97-AM-1127 R97 SIN 000762-B6716101 3URMHFW&RRUGLQDWRU)HUURYLHGHOOR6WDWRVSD ,7 3DUWQHUV )HUURYLHGHOOR6WDWR6RFLHWjGL6HUYL]LH7UDVSRUWRSHU$]LRQL³)66S$´ $($7HFKQRORJ\UDLOIRUPHUO\³%55´ 'HXWVFKH%DKQ$*³'%$*´ 5HG1DFLRQDOGHORV)HUURFDUULOHV(VSDQROHV³5(1)(´ 6RFLHWH1DWLRQDOGHV&KHPLQVGH)HU)UDQoDLV(3,&³61&)´ )RXQGDWLRQ(XURSHDQ5DLO5HVHDUFK,QVWLWXWH³(55,´ 6FLUR(OHFWUD6UO³6&,52´ 'DWH5RPH6HSWHPEHU 3URMHFWFRIXQGHGE\WKH(XURSHDQ&RPPLVVLRQ XQGHUWKH7UDQVSRUW57'3URJUDPPHRIWKH ,9)UDPHZRUN3URJUDPPH +,63(('0,;3URMHFW R97 SIN 000762-B6716101 Project co-funded by the European Commission contract n. RA-97-AM-1127 Transport RTD Programme - IV Framework Programme '(/,9(5$%/(³'´ PROJECT BATCH DOCUMENT CODIFICATION REV PAGE )LQDO5HSRUWIRU3XEOLFDWLRQ E377 00 0 DI TC SV 40 06 00 020 B 2 of 931 Deliverable D10 F I N A L R E P O R T FOR PUBLICATION +LJK6SHHG)UHLJKWRQWKH(XURSHDQ+LJK6SHHG 5DLOZD\1HWZRUN B 05.09.2001 2nd definitive issue REV. DATE DESCRIPTION A 17.10.2000 1st definitive issue All the Work Package Leaders Project Manager Steering Committee REV. DATE DESCRIPTION ISSUED VERIFIED APPROVED T:\j\jensemo\Hispeedmix FinalRfP.docD:\temp\IECache\OLK8\FinalRfP.docC:\TEMP\FinalRfP_rev2.doc +,63(('0,;3URMHFW R97 SIN 000762-B6716101 Project co-funded by the European Commission contract n. RA-97-AM-1127 Transport RTD Programme - IV Framework Programme '(/,9(5$%/(³'´ PROJECT BATCH DOCUMENT CODIFICATION REV PAGE )LQDO5HSRUWIRU3XEOLFDWLRQ E377 00 0 DI TC SV 40 06 00 020 B 3 of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a) Train Control System – Current situation 3234 b) Co-operation with the current systems 3336 c) Conclusion 3437 % %86,1(66$1'6(59,&(&21&(37 0DUNHW6HJPHQWV +,63(('0,;3URMHFW R97 SIN 000762-B6716101 Project co-funded by the European Commission contract n. RA-97-AM-1127 Transport RTD Programme - IV Framework Programme '(/,9(5$%/(³'´ PROJECT BATCH DOCUMENT CODIFICATION REV PAGE )LQDO5HSRUWIRU3XEOLFDWLRQ E377 00 0 DI TC SV 40 06 00 020 B 4 of 931 a) Air Freight 3538 b) Integrator Traffic 3639 c) Mail 3841 d) Express Road Freight 4043 3RWHQWLDO7UDIILF 3HUIRUPDQFHFULWHULD a) Time requirements 4447 b) Price requirements and added values 4447 & 7(&+12/2*<$1',1)5$6758&785( 'HPDQGVRQUROOLQJVWRFN a) Loading Capacity 4447 b) Loading Units and Loading Technique 4548 c) Vehicle Gauges 4851 'HPDQGVRQLQIUDVWUXFWXUH a) Track 4851 b) Power supply 4952 c) Gradients 5053 d) Interconnection of main line and branch lines 5053 e) Demands on loading terminals 5154 5$06 a) Reference Conditions 5154 b) RAM 5255 c) Consignment Reliability 5356 d) Safety Requirements for Dangerous Goods 5558 76,FULWHULDV 'HPDQGVRQLQWHUQDWLRQDOUHJXODWLRQV 8,& ' 23(5$7,21$/,668(6 &DSDFLW\ 7LPHWDEOLQJ ( &$6(678'< 'HVFULSWLRQ a) Why Paris - Brussels - Cologne? 6265 b) Location of the terminals on Paris-Brussels-Cologne line 6265 c) Demand and number of trains 6265 7HFKQLFDOLVVXHV a) The railway network 6467 b) Signalling system 6669 c) The Case study trainsets 6669 +,63(('0,;3URMHFW R97 SIN 000762-B6716101 Project co-funded by the European Commission contract n. RA-97-AM-1127 Transport RTD Programme - IV Framework Programme '(/,9(5$%/(³'´ PROJECT BATCH DOCUMENT CODIFICATION REV PAGE )LQDO5HSRUWIRU3XEOLFDWLRQ E377 00 0 DI TC SV 40 06 00 020 B 5 of 931 d) The case study power supply system 6972 e) Electrical substation and autotransformer data 6972 f) Feeding system line section 7073 g) Electrical feeding system scheme 7174 /LPLWVDQGSRWHQWLDOV &RVWV SRLQWRIYLHZRIDQRSHUDWRU 5HVXOWV 9,,, &21&/86,216$1')8785(:25. ,; /,672)38%/,&$7,216&21)(5(1&(6$1'35(6(17$7,216 ; $&521<06 ;, 5()(5(1&(6 +,63(('0,;3URMHFW R97 SIN 000762-B6716101 Project co-funded by the European Commission contract n. RA-97-AM-1127 Transport RTD Programme - IV Framework Programme '(/,9(5$%/(³'´ PROJECT BATCH DOCUMENT CODIFICATION REV PAGE )LQDO5HSRUWIRU3XEOLFDWLRQ E377 00 0 DI TC SV 40 06 00 020 B 6 of 931 ,, 3DUWQHUVKLS 7he partners in the HISPEEDMIX project have been chosen in such a way to avoid overlaps and obtain synergy. The partnership structure has been set up focusing on two groups of complementary members. Two Research and Development organisations specialised in the transport area which are involved at European and National level with projects linked to Hispeedmix: 1) the Research Institute of the English Railways AEA Technology Rail and 2) the Italian Consultant Company of the transport sector SCIRO. Four of the most important rail freight operators and infrastructure managers in Europe: DB-Germany, FS-Italy, RENFE-Spain and SNCF-France. In addition ERRI, the European Rail Research Institute, added its own expertise and established close links with all member railways, not directly participating in the project. Four European Universities: Leeds (GB), Catalonia (ES), Madrid (ES) and Genoa (I), with the Centre for Transport Research, worked for the project development as well, as sub-contractors. 7he future-orientated research and development work of the Deutsche Bahn AG is also integrated with the experimental activities in the Research and Technology Centre (RTC). The RTC has emerged from the unification and concentration of sections of the former central offices and testing facilities of the German Federal Railways and the German State Railways. With the creation of the research and technology sections at the DB AG 5 years ago, a process of change in the interplay between the railway and industry began simultaneously. Against the backdrop of the second stage of the railway reform, which gave rise of five large group subsidiaries in the form of limited companies under a management holding company at the beginning of 1999, the RTC took over the role of an innovative connecting link between the DB AG group as a mobility service provider and transportation company and between industry as a manufacturer. In doing so, the extensive wealth of knowledge has become increasingly directed at the core tasks of the RTC: • System development of the railways with regard to the interplay between the technical subsystems and the individual group subsidiaries. • Definition of the interaction of the sub-systems in their contact areas or interfaces. +,63(('0,;3URMHFW R97 SIN 000762-B6716101 Project co-funded by the European Commission contract n. RA-97-AM-1127 Transport RTD Programme - IV Framework Programme '(/,9(5$%/(³'´ PROJECT BATCH DOCUMENT CODIFICATION REV PAGE )LQDO5HSRUWIRU3XEOLFDWLRQ E377 00 0 DI TC SV 40 06 00 020 B 7 of 931 • Services in the form of: tests technological advice experts opinions project management. This includes extensive market monitoring, i.e. for both the railway customers and the RTC customers, of technological matters and of competitors. The RTC customers are essentially the group subsidiaries DB Reise & Touristik, DB Regio, DB Cargo, DB Netz and DB Station & Service. The manufacturers of railway technology and other construction companies also use the RTC facilities for testing and experimental purposes. The DB AG through the RTC was responsible for the Hispeedmix project operational aspects. 7he European Rail Research Institute (ERRI) is a foundation under Dutch law within the International Union of Railways (UIC) responsible for carrying out research, studies and tests to advance knowledge of railway technology in fields of common interest. ERRI currently boasts 32 European Participants and 10 Affiliates from a total of 28 countries, including worldwide research organisations in the USA (AAR), Japan (RTRI), South Africa (Spoornet) and India (RDSO). This affiliation is in line with ERRI's objectives to stimulate international interchange of information and technology. The Headquarters are based in Utrecht, the Netherlands. ERRI carries out a policy of co-operating with various partners (users, railway operators and industry, technical research centres, universities, etc.) knowing that pooling resources will boost the effectiveness of projects and allow more flexibility and responsiveness to research requirements at a European level. Its role includes co-ordinating long-term research programmes and ERRI is particularly active in: • Management and execution of studies, research and tests • Drafting of research and development programmes • Development and testing of railway equipment • Monitoring of emerging technologies and their application to the railways ERRI operates with professional in-house technical and management specialists and with contracted specialised resources allocated to each project. ERRI can call on over 500 railway specialists, from a wide range of disciplines. The laboratories and testing facilities of the European railways are available to us for model/full-scale tests and demonstrations. The various resources needed to +,63(('0,;3URMHFW R97 SIN 000762-B6716101 Project co-funded by the European Commission contract n. RA-97-AM-1127 Transport RTD Programme -
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Replacing Amtrak: Privatization, Regionalization, and Liquidation
    P o l i c y S t u d y N o . 2 3 5 , O c t o b e r 1 9 9 7 RReeppllaacciinngg AAmmttrraakk:: A Blueprint for Sustainable Passenger Rail Service by Joseph Vranich EXECUTIVE SUMMARY mtrak is a failed national experiment. By its own admission, Amtrak is headed for bankruptcy unless Washington provides another multi-billion-dollar bail-out. Another federal rescue is A unjustified considering that federal and state subsidies to Amtrak since its inception in 1971 are nearing $22.5 billion, an amount out of proportion to Amtrak’s usefulness in most of the nation. The federal government does not run a national airline. It doesn’t operate a national bus company. There’s no justification for a national railroad passenger operation. America needs passenger trains in selected areas, but doesn’t need Amtrak’s antiquated route system, poor service, unreasonable operating deficits, and capital investment program with low rates of return. Amtrak’s failures result in part because it is a public monopoly—the very type of organization least able to innovate. This study reveals an Amtrak credibility crisis in the way it reports ridership figures, glosses over dwindling market share, understates subsidies, issues misleading cost-recovery claims, offers doubtful promises regarding high-speed rail, lacks proper authority for the freight business it recently launched, and misrepresents privatization as its applies to Amtrak. It’s time to liquidate Amtrak, privatize and regionalize parts of it, permit alternative operators to transform some long-distance trains into land-cruise trains, and stop service on hopeless routes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2-Stroke Diesels on Britain's Rail Network
    2-Stroke Diesels on Britain’s Rail Network Rodger Bradley Back in the 1950s, when British Railways was beginning work on the “Modernisation & Re-Equipment Programme” – effectively the changeover from steam to diesel and electric traction – the focus in the diesel world was mainly between high and medium speed engines. On top of which, there was a practical argument to support hydraulic versus electric transmission technology – for main line use, mechanical transmission was never a serious contender. The first main line diesels had appeared in the very last days before nationalisation, and the choice of prime mover was shaped to a great extent by the experience of private industry, and English Electric in particular. The railway workshops had little or no experience in The prototype main-line 2-stroke powered loco for the field, and the better known steam locomotive express passenger service on BR was never repeated. builders had had some less than successful attempts to Photo: Thomas's Pics CC BY 2.0, offer examples of the new diesel locomotives. That https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=50662416 said, some of the smaller companies, who had worked with the railways pre-WW2 to supply small shunting Pilot Scheme & Modernisation In the first flush of enthusiasm for the new technology, British Railways announced three types of diesel locomotive to be trialled for main line use; diesel shunters had already been in use for a number of years. The shunting types were a mix of electric and mechanical transmission, paired with 4-stroke diesel engines, and not surprisingly the first main line designs included electric transmission and 4-stroke, medium speed engines.
    [Show full text]
  • British Rail Maintenance Limited: Sale of Maintenance Depots
    NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE REPORT BY THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL British Rail Maintenance Limited: Sale of Maintenance Depots ORDERED BY THE HOUSE OF COMMONS TO BE PRINTED 15 JULY 1996 LONDON:HMSO HC583 Session1995-96 Published19 July1996 29.70 BRITISHML WNTENWCE UMITED: S~E OF WNTEN~CE DEPOTS This report has been prepared under Section 6 of the National Audit Act, 1983 for presentation to the House of Commons in accordance with Section 9 of the Act. John Bourn National Audit Office Comptroller and Auditor General 8 Jtiy 1996 The Comptroller and Auditor General is the head of the National Audit Office employing some 750 staff. He, and the NAO,are totaUy independent of Government. He certifies the accounts of au Government departments and a wide range of other puhhc sector bodies; and he has statutory authori@ to report to Parliament on the economy, efficiency and effectiveness with which departments and other bodies have used their resources. BRITISH ML WINTENANCE LIMITED: SALE OF WNTENANCE DEPOTS Contents Page Introduction, summary and principal conclusions 1 Part 1: Privatisation as soou as possible h a competitive process 8 Timetable 8 Sales process 10 - Generating interest 10 - Maintaining price tension 10 - Information available to bidders 15 Part 2: Mtitatimg safety, reducing costs and improving efficiency 17 tithin a competitive entionment Safety 18 Restructuring 18 Intellectual property 19 WorMoad contracts 21 Bidding framework 21 Part 3: Obtaining the best possfile market price, taking account of 23 sale costs, habfities, staff iuterests Best possible market price 23 - Sale structure 23 - Valuation 32 - Property clawback 33 Selection of adtisers and costs 34 Indemnities and warranties 35 Staff interests 36 - Assistance to management buy-out teams 36 - Employees’ terms and conditions 36 Part 4 The classification of docmnents as “Not for NAO eyes” 38 Glossary 42 Appendices 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Delay Attribution Board Members and Representation
    OFFICIAL Delay Attribution Board Members and Representation Franchised Passenger Class Band 1 DAB Representative Abellio ScotRail Veronica Bolton Avanti West Coast Trains Govia Thameslink Railway Franchised Passenger Class Band 2 Abellio East Anglia London & South Eastern Railway Phil Starling Arriva Rail North London North Eastern Railway First Great Western Ltd West Midlands Trains First MTR South Western Railway Franchised Passenger Class Band 3 Arriva Rail London Merseyrail Electrics Steve Longmore Chiltern Railway Company MTR Crossrail Cross Country Trains Serco Caledonian Sleepers East Midlands Trains Trenitalia C2C First TransPennine Express Keolis Amey Wales Non-Franchised Passenger Class Chinnor and Princes Risborough Nexus Tyne and Wear Jonathan Seagar East Coast Trains North Yorkshire Moors Railway Eurostar International Peak Rail Ffestiniog Railway Rail Express Systems Grand Central Railway Company Vintage Trains Heathrow Express West Coast Railway Company Hull Trains Company Yorkshire Supertram Locomotive Services Limited Non-Passenger Class companies - Band 1 DB Cargo Nigel Oatway Freightliner Non-Passenger Class companies - Band 2 Amey Rail Ltd GB Railfreight Mike Byrne Babcock Rail Harsco Rail Balfour Beatty Plant Rail Express Systems COLAS Rail Ltd Rail Operations Group Devon and Cornwall Railways Victa Railfreight Direct Rail Services VolkerRail Freightliner Heavy Haul Network Rail Alex Kenney Andrew Rowe Georgina Collinge Scott Provan Paul Harris Anna Langford Non-Voting Members Chairman: Richard Morris Secretary: Richard Ashley April 2021 .
    [Show full text]
  • RAILWAY REFORM 2027En.Fm Page 1 Wednesday, June 21, 2000 10:30 AM
    rail gb ok prepa 26/12/00 17:34 Page 1 RAILWAY REFORM EUROPEAN CONFERENCE OF MINISTERS TRANSPORT 2027en.fm Page 1 Wednesday, June 21, 2000 10:30 AM © OECD, 2001. © Software: 1987-1996, Acrobat is a trademark of ADOBE. All rights reserved. OECD grants you the right to use one copy of this Program for your personal use only. Unauthorised reproduction, lending, hiring, transmission or distribution of any data or software is prohibited. You must treat the Program and associated materials and any elements thereof like any other copyrighted material. All requests should be made to: Head of Publications Division Public Affairs and Communication Directorate 2, rue André-Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France. RAILWAY REFORM Regulation of Freight Transport Markets EUROPEAN CONFERENCE OF MINISTERS OF TRANSPORT EUROPEAN CONFERENCE OF MINISTERS OF TRANSPORT (ECMT) The European Conference of Ministers of Transport (ECMT) is an inter-governmental organisation established by a Protocol signed in Brussels on 17 October 1953. It is a forum in which Ministers responsible for transport, and more specifically the inland transport sector, can co-operate on policy. Within this forum, Ministers can openly discuss current problems and agree upon joint approaches aimed at improving the utilisation and at ensuring the rational development of European transport systems of international importance. At present, the ECMT’s role primarily consists of: – helping to create an integrated transport system throughout the enlarged Europe that is economically and technically efficient, meets the highest possible safety and environmental standards and takes full account of the social dimension; – helping also to build a bridge between the European Union and the rest of the continent at a political level.
    [Show full text]
  • Privatised Railway
    The Privatised Railway Research Paper 97/71 30 May 1997 This Research Paper summarises the present structure of the rail industry introduced in April 1994 following the passing of the Railways Act 1993. More detail of the legal framework is given in earlier Library papers (Rail Privatisation: a Progress Report (Research Paper 95/96), The Privatisation of Railtrack (Research Paper 96/54) and Rail Passenger Franchises (Research Paper 96/85)). For convenience the names and addresses of all the main organisations are included and the addresses and telephone numbers of the train operating companies and of the companies who now run them are listed in the accompanying Research Paper 97/72 The Railway Passenger Companies. Fiona Poole Business & Transport Section House of Commons Library Library Research Papers are compiled for the benefit of Members of Parliament and their personal staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of these papers with Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. Summary The Railways Act 1993 provided the legal framework for the privatisation of British Rail and the introduction of a new structure for the rail industry. The Act received Royal Assent in November 1993 and many of the principal changes were brought into effect on 1 April 1994. Two new statutory officers, the Rail Regulator and the Franchising Director, were established to oversee the industry. Railtrack became a separate Government owned company and was sold to the private sector in May 1996. British Rail was split into about 100 companies, almost all of which have been sold to the private sector or closed down.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to Charter Train Operators Holding
    Les Waters Senior Manager, Licensing Email: [email protected] 25 June 2020 To charter train operators holding European passenger licences and SNRPs: Direct Rail Services Ltd GB Railfreight Ltd Locomotive Services (TOC) Ltd Rail Express Systems Ltd Rail Operations UK Ltd Vintage Trains Ltd West Coast Railway Company Ltd Cc: Department for Transport, Transport Scotland, Transport for Wales, Transport Focus, London TravelWatch, Rail Delivery Group, Transport for London, Rail North, CAHA Registrar, Eurostar Licence Modifications: Rail Passengers’ Rights and Obligations Regulation We wrote to you and other stakeholders 22 October 20191 about the drafting of amendments of certain conditions in each passenger statement of national regulatory provisions (“SNRP”) issued under the Railway (Licensing of Railway Undertakings) Regulations 2005 and station licences (issued under the Railways Act 1993 (“the Act”). Such changes are required by law following the expiry of the domestic exemption on 3 December 2019, from certain obligations in the Rail Passengers’ Rights and Obligations Regulations 20102 (the “RPRO 2010”). Notwithstanding that implementation is mandatory, we asked for comments on the drafting of the proposed SNRP and station licence amendments. Rail Express Systems Limited (“RES”) raised a point relating to its provision of services which we wanted to consider further. RES was concerned as to the effect the RPRO 2010 modification would have in the situation where a passenger SNRP holder provides ‘traction-only’ services for a client. We therefore held off modifying any charter operator SNRPs while we considered this point. An example of ‘traction-only’ operation would be where a charter train operator is hauling trains under its passenger SNRP on behalf of a third party tour operator.
    [Show full text]
  • English Welsh & Scottish Railway
    Durham E-Theses Railway and grade: the historical construction of contemporary Strangleman, Tim How to cite: Strangleman, Tim (1998) Railway and grade: the historical construction of contemporary, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4870/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk Tim Strangleman Railway and Grade: The Historical Construction of Contemporary Identities The copyright of this thesis rests with tlie author. No quotation from it should be published PhD. Thesis without the written consent of tlie autlior and information derived from it should be acknowledged. University of Durham o 1998 Thesis Abstract This thesis attempts to understand the role and meaning of occupational identity in the contemporary British railway industry. It examines the way in which culture change initiatives and prograrrmies have explicitly targeted an older 'railroad culture'.
    [Show full text]
  • PR18 Glossary Overview
    PR18 glossary Overview This document provides definitions and/or explanations for terms used in our PR18 final determination documentation. Annex 1 sets out the names of train operators referred to in our documents. Term Definition ABP Activity based planning Achievability Red/amber/green ratings used on Network Rail’s scorecards to RAG ratings reflect its views on the achievability of targets AIP Asset improvement plan AIS Asset Information Services ALARP As low as reasonably practicable AMEM Asset management excellence model ATP Automatic train protection system Building blocks A term used to describe, in general terms, the approach used by approach economic regulators to determine revenue requirements for regulated network businesses Capex Capital expenditure A Network Rail business unit other than the routes and the System Central function Operator A measure which is to be consistently defined and calculated across Consistent route each route to enable route comparison. A list of these, with measure (CRM) definitions, is provided at the end of this glossary Constant prices Financial values all expressed in the price base of a specified year, even if those values are attributable to a range of years 1 Term Definition COO Chief operating officer CP4 Control period 4 (1 April 2009 – 31 March 2014) CP5 Control period 5 (1 April 2014 – 31 March 2019) CP6 Control period 6 (which will run from 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2024) These are trajectories for consistent route measures required by ORR in the PR18 final determination, reflecting our expectations regarding Network Rail’s performance in these areas in CP6 in the CP6 baseline context of the funding available.
    [Show full text]
  • Railways Act 1993
    REVIEW INITIATION NOTICE NOTICE OF PROPOSAL TO UNDERTAKE AN ACCESS CHARGES REVIEW UNDER PARAGRAPH 1C OF SCHEDULE 4A TO THE RAILWAYS ACT 1993 TO: Each of the persons listed in the annex to this notice. 1. This notice is given by the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) under paragraph 1C. 2. The period to which ORR expects this access charges review (PR08) to relate is 1 April 2009 to 31 March 2014. 3. The date by which each of the Secretary of State and Scottish Ministers need to provide the information that has to be provided under paragraph 1D is 31 July 2007. 4. There are no conditions which ORR requires to be satisfied if ORR is to proceed with PR08. 5. In this notice, unless the context otherwise requires: (a) words and phrases defined in the Railways Act 1993 have the same meanings in this notice; (b) the singular includes the plural and vice versa; and (c) references are to the provisions of Schedule 4A to the Railways Act 1993. For and on the behalf of Office of Rail Regulation 28 February 2007 Doc # 262776.04 ANNEX PERSONS NOTIFIED UNDER PARAGRAPH 1C This Annex sets out the persons upon whom this notice is being served in accordance with paragraph 1C: (a) the Secretary of State pursuant to paragraph 1C(1)(a). (b) the Scottish Ministers pursuant to paragraph 1C(1)(b). (c) the Treasury pursuant to paragraph 1C(1)(c). (d) the following persons as parties to one or more access agreements in respect of track and/or stations pursuant to paragraph 1C(1)(d): Advenza Freight Ltd Amec Spie Rail (UK) Ltd Arriva Trains Wales/Trenau Arriva Cymru
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Rail Freight in Europe: What Regulation Can and Cannot Do
    Development of rail freight in Europe: What regulation can and cannot do United Kingdom Case Study Professor Allan Woodburn (University of Westminster) Brussels, 11 December 2014 141211_CERRE_RailFreight_UK_Case_Study_Final 1/43 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3 2. The demand side.................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Key bulk freight markets ................................................................................................ 3 2.2 Other freight markets .................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 5 3. The supply side ...................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Trends in rail freight activity .......................................................................................... 8 3.2 Structure of the rail freight market .............................................................................. 14 3.3 Key characteristics of the rail freight operators .......................................................... 18 4. Rail freight regulation .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • British Rail's Last Diesel the Brush Class 60
    British Rail’s Last Diesel The Brush Class 60 Rodger Bradley British Rail’s Last Diesel – The Brush Class 60_Final Layout.docx It may be a controversial observation, but the Brush designed Class 60 heavy freight locomotive was the last genuinely British built diesel-electric type. The locomotive was considered initially as a replacement for English Electric’s ageing Class 37 design – but with British Rail sectorisation, and the changed Railfreight priorities, a different approach was needed. In the late 1980s, a private company, contracted to haul mineral trains ordered and brought to the UK, the 2-stroke General Motors Class 59 – it was of course Foster Yeoman. The design and operation of this locomotive was a success, but it was for a niche market, although it brought some innovative ideas in its use of technology. Before their arrival, BR had produced its main line locomotive renewal programme, within which it was stated that 750 new freight diesels would be needed of between 750 and 2,500hp, with delivery from 1990 onwards. BR also stated it would not place orders of less than 100 locos at a time, to ensure continuity of production, and rolling replacement of older designs. Of course, by the late 1980s, both the Class 56 and 58 freight types – built in Doncaster and Romania – had been in service for a few years, with the rail industry still suffering from under investment across the board. On the horizon too was the prospect of privatisation, which had already had an impact on the railway workshops, individually, and as BR Engineering Ltd.
    [Show full text]