DOCSLIB.ORG

Kovblyuk M.M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kovblyuk M.M Arthropoda Selecta 19(3): 207213 © ARTHROPODA SELECTA, 2010 Êðèòèêà è áèáëèîãðàôèÿ. Book Review Joerg Wunderlich. 2008. Fossil and extant spiders (Araneae). Phylogeny, diversifications, extinctions, biogeography, ecology and ethology; with descriptions of new fossil and extant taxa // Beiträge zur Araneologie. Vol. 5. 870 pp, ca 400 coloured photos and 1000 drawings. Éîðã Âóíäåðëèõ. 2008. Èñêîïàåìûå è ðåöåíòíûå ïàóêè (Araneae). Ôèëîãåíèÿ, ôîðìîîáðàçîâàíèå, âûìèðàíèå, áèîãåîãðàôèÿ, ýêîëîãèÿ è ýòîëîãèÿ; ñ îïèñàíèÿìè íîâûõ èñêîïàåìûõ è ðåöåíòíûõ òàêñîíîâ // Beiträge zur Araneologie. Òîì 5. 870 ñòð., 400 öâåòíûõ ôîòî è 1000 ðèñóíêîâ. Âûøåë â ñâåò î÷åðåäíîé (5-é), òðàäèöèîííî öåíòíûõ ïàóêîâ. Òåì íå ìåíåå, ïîñëåäíèé òîì ìî- î÷åíü îáú¸ìèñòûé (870 ñòðàíèö!), òîì «Beiträge zur æåò áûòü ïîëåçåí íå òîëüêî ïàëåîíòîëîãàì. Ïîýòî- Araneologie (= Âêëàä â àðàíåîëîãèþ)» Éîðãà Âóí- ìó îñíîâíàÿ öåëü ìîåé ðåöåíçèè ïðîèíôîðìèðî- äåðëèõà. Êàê è âñå ïðåäûäóùèå òîìà «Âêëàäîâ...», âàòü øèðîêèé êðóã ðóññêî-ÿçû÷íûõ àðàõíîëîãîâ î îí íàïå÷àòàí â ñîáñòâåííîì èçäàòåëüñòâå àâòîðà âàæíûõ ðåçóëüòàòàõ, îáíàðîäîâàííûõ â ýòîé íîâîé (Publishing House Joerg Wunderlich). Èçäàíèÿ «Âêëà- è âàæíîé êíèãå. äîâ ...» ìàëî äîñòóïíû øèðîêîìó êðóãó ïîñò-ñîâåò- ñêèõ àðàõíîëîãîâ, îòñóòñòâóþò â áèáëèîòåêàõ, íå- Ñîäåðæàíèå êíèãè ìàëî ñòîÿò è, ê òîìó æå, â ïîñëåäíèå ãîäû àäðåñî- Áðîñàåòñÿ â ãëàçà ïðåêðàñíàÿ ïîëèãðàôèÿ íîâîé âàíû ïðåèìóùåñòâåííî ïàëåîíòîëîãàì, ïîýòîìó êíèãè êàê, âïðî÷åì, è ïðåäûäóùèõ òîìîâ (Vol. 3A ìàëî èçâåñòíû ñðåäè àðàõíîëîãîâ, èçó÷àþùèõ ðå- & 3B çà 2004 ã.). Òîì â òâ¸ðäîé îáëîæêå íàïå÷àòàí 208 Book Review íà ìåëîâàííîé áóìàãå è ñîäåðæèò öâåòíûå ôîòî- ìåíòû ïîâåäåíèÿ è ýêîëîãèè, êîòîðûå èçó÷åíû àâ- ãðàôèè èñêîïàåìûõ «ÿíòàðíûõ» ïàóêîâ. Öâåòíûå òîðîì ïî ÿíòàðíûì èíêëþçàì (îáúåêòû ïèòàíèÿ, ôîòî âûíåñåíû â îòäåëüíûé ðàçäåë êíèãè (ñòð. 791 ýêòîïàðàçèòû, êàííèáàëèçì, àóòîòîìèÿ íîã, ïàóòè- 868).  Ïðèëîæåíèå (Appendix) âûíåñåí ïðåäìåò- íà). Òàêèå àñïåêòû èçó÷åíèÿ ÿíòàðíûõ èíêëþçîâ íûé óêàçàòåëü îïèñàííûõ â êíèãå íàäðîäîâûõ òàê- îáðàçíî íàçâàíû «çàìîðîæåííûì/çàñòûâøèì ïîâå- ñîíîâ (ñòð. 869). äåíèåì» (frozen behaviour). Äàëåå 2 ñòðàíèöû ïî- Êîðîòêîå ââåäåíèå (3 ñòðàíèöû) ïîñâÿùåíî ñâÿùåíû ñëó÷àÿì ïîääåëîê ÿíòàðíûõ èíêëþçîâ ñ îáúÿñíåíèþ òîãî, ÷òî èçó÷åíèå èñêîïàåìûõ ïàóêîâ ïàóêàìè. ïîçâîëÿåò ïðîëèòü ñâåò íà ïóòè ýâîëþöèè ïàóêîâ, Íà ñëåäóþùèõ 11 ñòðàíèöàõ (2940) ïðèâîäèò- âûÿñíèòü ãåîëîãè÷åñêèé âîçðàñò è ìåñòî âîçíèêíî- ñÿ îáîáùåíèå ïîëó÷åííûõ àâòîðîì ðåçóëüòàòîâ, âåíèÿ ñîâðåìåííûõ òàêñîíîâ, îïðåäåëèòü ïîëÿð- êàñàþùèõñÿ ôèëîãåíèè è áèîãåîãðàôèè èñêîïàå- íîñòü ïðèçíàêîâ (ïëåçèîìîðôèÿ èëè àïîìîðôèÿ), ìûõ ïàóêîâ. Îòìå÷åíû òàêèå ýâîëþöèîííûõ òåí- âûÿñíèòü îñîáåííîñòè ïèòàíèÿ, ðàñïðîñòðàíåíèÿ è äåíöèè: óâåëè÷åíèå ðàçìåðîâ òåëà ó Salticidae, ðàçíîîáðàçèÿ ïàóêîâ â ïðîøëîì, óçíàòü ïðî îñî- Segestriidae, Theridiidae è Zygiellidae; ðåäóêöèÿ êî- áåííîñòè êëèìàòà â ìèíóâøèå ãåîëîãè÷åñêèå ýïî- ëþëóñà è âîîðóæåíèÿ íîã ó Theridiidae; ðåäóêöèÿ õè. Çà ââåäåíèåì ñëåäóþò 14 ñàìîñòîÿòåëüíûõ ðà- ïåðåäíèõ ìåäèàëüíûõ ãëàç ó ìåëêèõ ïàóêîâ (íå ïå- áîò, î÷åíü íåðàâíîöåííûõ êàê ïî îáú¸ìó, òàê è ïî ùåðíûõ!). Ïåðåäíèå ìåäèàëüíûå ãëàçà ó ïàóêîâ íå çíà÷èìîñòè. Êàê è äðóãèå êíèãè É. Âóíäåðëèõà, ðå- èíâåðòèðîâàííûå, à âñå îñòàëüíûå èíâåðòèðîâàí- öåíçèðóåìûé òîì ïðåäñòàâëÿåò ñîáîé íå öåëüíóþ íûå (ïîäðîáíåå ìîæíî ïðî÷èòàòü, íàïðèìåð, â ìî- ðàáîòó, à, ïî ñóòè äåëà, êàëåéäîñêîï çàìåòîê ïî íîãðàôèÿõ À.Â. Èâàíîâà [1965] èëè R.F. Foelix ðàçíûì âîïðîñàì àðàõíîëîãèè è ïî ðàçíûì ãðóï- [1996]). Ïðåäïîëàãàåòñÿ, ÷òî ðåäóêöèÿ èìåííî ïå- ïàì ïàóêîâ. Ðàññìîòðèì êàæäóþ èç ýòèõ ðàáîò ïî ðåäíèõ ìåäèàëüíûõ ãëàç ìîæåò áûòü ñâÿçàíà ñ ïðî- îòäåëüíîñòè. ãðåññèâíîé ýâîëþöèåé äðóãîãî òèïà ãëàç èíâåð- òèðîâàííûõ.  íà÷àëå ÷åòâåðòè÷íîãî ïåðèîäà ïî- 1. Contribution on fossil and extant spiders. ëîâîé äèìîðôèçì ó ìíîãèõ ãðóïï ïàóêîâ åù¸ íå Ê èçó÷åíèþ èñêîïàåìûõ è ñîâðåìåííûõ ïàóêîâ. áûë âûðàæåí ñòîëü ñèëüíî, êàê ñåé÷àñ. Íàïðèìåð, Îòêðûâàåò êíèãó ãëàâà, ïîñâÿù¸ííàÿ îáùèì âîï- ó ñàìöîâ Theridiidae è Tetragnathidae íå áûëî òàêèõ ðîñàì ìåòîäèêàì è îáíàðóæåííûì çàêîíîìåðíî- èñêëþ÷èòåëüíî äëèííûõ è ìîùíûõ õåëèöåð, êàê ó ñòÿì. Íà ýòó ÷àñòü ïðèõîäèòñÿ 30 ñòðàíèö òåêñòà. íåêîòîðûõ ñîâðåìåííûõ ïðåäñòàâèòåëåé ýòèõ ãðóïï Ïåðâûå 3 ñòðàíèöû ñîäåðæàò ïåðå÷åíü îïå÷àòîê, (Enoplognatha è Tetragnatha, ñîîòâåòñòâåííî). Ãè- äîïóùåííûõ â ïðåäûäóùèõ òîìàõ èçäàíèÿ (Vol. ãàíòèçì ñàìîê è êàðëèêîâîñòü ñàìöîâ (ó ìíîãèõ 3A & 3B çà 2004 ã.). Çàòåì íà äâóõ ñòðàíèöàõ ñëåäó- Araneidae, Latrodectus â Theridiidae) ðàçâèëèñü íå þò êîììåíòàðèè/îòâåòû àâòîðà ïî ïîâîäó êðèòè- ðàíåå îëèãîöåíà (â ýîöåíå ðàçìåðíûé ïîëîâîé äè- ÷åñêîé ðåöåíçèè J. Dunlop íà òå æå ïðåäûäóùèå ìîðôèçì â ýòèõ ãðóïïàõ íå âûðàæåí). Íå èñêëþ÷å- äâà òîìà. íî, ÷òî ýòîò âûâîä íå êîððåêòåí, òàê êàê èñêîïàå- Äàëåå óêàçàíû èñòî÷íèêè è ìåñòà õðàíåíèÿ ìà- ìîå ðàçíîîáðàçèå îòðàæàåò òîëüêî ìèçåðíûé ïðî- òåðèàëà (ÿíòàðÿ ñ èíêëþçàìè), îñîáåííîñòè õðàíå- öåíò îò ðåàëüíî ñóùåñòâîâàâøåãî, î ÷åì ïèøåò è íèÿ èíêëþçîâ (ïðîáëåìà â òîì, ÷òî îíè áûñòðî ñàì É. Âóíäåðëèõ. òåìíåþò), êðèòåðèè âûáîðà ãîëîòèïà è ïàðàòèïîâ, Êîëè÷åñòâî èçâåñòíûõ ñåé÷àñ ðåöåíòíûõ âèäîâ ìåòîäû ïîäãîòîâêè ïðåïàðàòîâ, èõ èçó÷åíèÿ è ôî- ïàóêîâ É. Âóíäåðëèõ îöåíèâàåò êàê ìåíåå 50% îò òîãðàôèðîâàíèÿ. Îáú¸ì ìàòåðèàëà, ïîñëóæèâøåãî ðåàëüíî ñóùåñòâóþùåãî êîëè÷åñòâà âèäîâ (êîòî- îñíîâîé äëÿ êíèãè, ñîñòàâëÿåò áîëåå 100 000 ýê- ðîå îí îöåíèâàåò ïðèìåðíî â 100 000 âèäîâ), à çåìïëÿðîâ ïàóêîâ â ÿíòàðå (ñòð. 22)! Îòìå÷àåòñÿ, êîëè÷åñòâî èçâåñòíûõ èñêîïàåìûõ âèäîâ ïðè- ÷òî àâòîð ñòàðàëñÿ îïèñûâàòü âèäû ïî ñàìöàì è ìåðíî â 0,1% (íåìíîãèì áîëåå 1000 âèäîâ) èç ìèë- èçáåãàë äåëàòü îïèñàíèÿ ïî ñàìêàì è þâåíèëüíûì ëèîíîâ âèäîâ ïàóêîâ, ðåàëüíî ñóùåñòâîâàâøèõ â îñîáÿì. Ó ñàìöîâ ïàëüïû ëó÷øå âèäíû è áîëåå ïðîøëîì. ïðèãîäíû äëÿ ïðîâåäåíèÿ äèôôåðåíöèàëüíîãî äè- Àâòîð ïûòàåòñÿ îöåíèòü âðåìÿ æèçíè ðîäà ó àãíîçà, íåæåëè ýïèãèíû ñàìîê, êîòîðûå ê òîìó æå ïàóêîâ. Îí îòìå÷àåò, ÷òî 100% ðîäîâ èç ìåëîâûõ ÷àñòî çàêðûòû áåëîé ýìóëüñèåé (ó þâåíèëîâ êîïó- ÿíòàðåé âûìåðëè, èç áîëåå ìîëîäûõ ýîöåíîâûõ ëÿòèâíûõ àïïàðàòîâ âîîáùå íåò, ÷òî íå ïîçâîëÿåò ÿíòàðåé (Áàëòèéñêèõ) âûìåðëî îêîëî 90% ðîäîâ, èñïîëüçîâàòü èõ äëÿ îïèñàíèÿ âèäîâ). Óêàçàíî, ÷òî èç åù¸ áîëåå ìîëîäûõ ìèîöåíîâûõ ÿíòàðåé (Äîìè- èñïîëüçîâàíû ëèøü «òðàäèöèîííûå» ìåòîäû ñèñ- íèêàíñêèõ) âûìåðëè îêîëî 33% ðîäîâ.  îòäåëü- òåìàòèêè è íå ïðèìåíÿþòñÿ ìåòîäû «êîìïüþòåð- íûõ ñëó÷àÿõ àâòîðó óäàëîñü ïðèìåðíî äàòèðîâàòü íîé êëàäèñòèêè», ÷òî ñâÿçàíî ñ îáèëèåì êîíâåð- âðåìÿ ôîðìèðîâàíèÿ ñîâðåìåííûõ ðîäîâ. Ê íà÷àëó ãåíöèé è ðåâåðñèé âàæíûõ òàêñîíîìè÷åñêèõ ïðè- òðåòè÷íîãî ïåðèîäà (îêîëî 50 ìëí. ë.í.) àâòîð îò- çíàêîâ ó ïàóêîâ. Ýòè ÿâëåíèÿ, êàê ïðàâèëî, íå ó÷è- íîñèò ôîðìèðîâàíèå «äðåâíèõ» ðîäîâ Episinus è òûâàþòñÿ «êîìïüþòåðíûìè êëàäèñòàìè» ïðè ïîñò- Laseola (Theridiidae), Orchestina (Oonopidae), Sege- ðîåíèè êëàññèôèêàöèè. stria (Segestriidae). Áîëüøèíñòâî ñîâðåìåííûõ âè- Çàòåì ñëåäóåò ïåðå÷èñëåíèå ïðèçíàêîâ, êîòî- äîâ èç ýòèõ ðîäîâ ðàñïðîñòðàíåíû â òðîïèêàõ. Ïîç- ðûå ñîõðàíÿþòñÿ â ÿíòàðå. Êðàòêî ðàññìîòðåíû ýëå- æå, íå ðàíåå ÷åì 35 ìëí. ëåò íàçàä, ñôîðìèðîâà- Book Review 209 ëèñü ñîâðåìåííûå ðîäà Araneus sensu lato (Ara- ìåøêó (èëè â ïîðÿäêå, ïîíÿòíîì ëèøü àâòîðó), ïî- neidae), Agyneta sensu lato, Erigone, Lepthyphantes ýòîìó íåëåãêî óÿñíèòü îáùóþ êàðòèíó (ñõåìó) ïðåä- sensu lato è Linyphia (Linyphiidae), Oecobius (Oeco- ïðèíÿòûõ íîìåíêëàòóðíûõ èçìåíåíèé, îñîáåííî biidae), Tetragnatha (Tetragnathidae), Achaearanea åñëè ó÷åñòü îáú¸ì ýòîé ÷àñòè êíèãè (ïî÷òè 100 sensu lato è Theridion sensu lato (Theridiidae). Áîëü- ñòðàíèö). øèíñòâî ñîâðåìåííûõ âèäîâ ýòèõ ðîäîâ ðàñïðîñò- ðàíåíû â Ñåâåðíîì Ïîëóøàðèè. 3. On extant and fossil (Eocene) European comb- Äðåâíèõ ñåìåéñòâ â ñîâðåìåííîé ôàóíå ñîõðà- footed spiders (Araneae: Theridiidae), with notes íèëîñü î÷åíü ìàëî. Ïîäñåìåéñòâî Orchestininae ñå- on their subfamilies, and with descriptions of new ìåéñòâà Oonopidae èçâåñòíî ïî ðàííèì íàõîäêàì taxa. Î ðåöåíòíûõ è èñêîïàåìûõ (ýîöåíîâûõ) ìåëîâîãî âîçðàñòà. Íåêîòîðûå î÷åíü äðåâíèå èñêî- åâðîïåéñêèõ òåðèäèèäàõ, ñ çàìå÷àíèÿìè î ïîä- ïàåìûå ñåìåéñòâà ñîõðàíèëèñü äî íàøåãî âðåìå- ñåìåéñòâàõ, è ñ îïèñàíèÿìè íîâûõ òàêñîíîâ. Ýòî íè, îäíàêî ïðîèçîøëî èçìåíåíèå (ñîêðàùåíèå) èõ ñàìàÿ îáøèðíàÿ (330 ñòð.) è, íà ìîé âçãëÿä, ñàìàÿ àðåàëîâ. Ê ïðèìåðó, ñåìåéñòâà Cyatholipidae è âàæíàÿ ÷àñòü êíèãè. Îíà íàñòîëüêî îáú¸ìíàÿ, ÷òî Synotaxidae (îáà èç íàäñåì. Araneoidea) èçâåñò- äàæå ñíàáæåíà ñâîèì îòäåëüíûì ïðåäìåòíûì óêà- íû èç ÿíòàðåé ýîöåíòîâîãî âîçðàñòà èç Åâðîïû è, çàòåëåì. Âðÿä ëè ýòî îïòèìàëüíîå ðåøåíèå óäîá- âîçìîæíî, áûëè ðàñïðîñòðàíåíû ïîâñåìåñòíî, îä- íåå áûëî áû ïîëüçîâàòüñÿ ïðåäìåòíûì óêàçàòåëåì, íàêî ñåé÷àñ ðàñïðîñòðàíåíèå Cyatholipidae îãðàíè- îáùèì äëÿ âñåé êíèãè. ÷åíî Þæíîé Àôðèêîé, Ìàäàãàñêàðîì è Íîâîé Çå- Ñåìåéñòâî Theridiidae íàèáîëåå ðàçíîîáðàçíî ëàíäèåé, à Synotaxidae Þæíîé è Öåíòðàëüíîé èç âñåõ ñåìåéñòâ ïàóêîâ Áàëòèéñêîãî ÿíòàðÿ, à â Àìåðèêîé è Àâñòðàëèåé. É. Âóíäåðëèõ ïðåäïîëà- ñîâðåìåííîé ôàóíå îíî çàíèìàåò òðåòüå ìåñòî ïî ãàåò, ÷òî â Åâðîïå ïðåäñòàâèòåëè ýòèõ ñåìåéñòâ âèäîâîìó ðàçíîîáðàçèþ ïîñëå Salticidae è Liny- âûìåðëè â ðåçóëüòàòå ïîõîëîäàíèÿ, âåðîÿòíî, íà phiidae. Îáèëèå èñêîïàåìîãî ìàòåðèàëà äàëî âîç- ãðàíèöå ýîöåíà è îëèãîöåíà, ïðèìåðíî 40 ìëí. ëåò ìîæíîñòü É. Âóíäåðëèõó ðåâàëèäèçèðîâàòü ìíîãèå íàçàä. Êîëîíèçèðîâàòü Ñåâåðíîå Ïîëóøàðèå ïî- ðîäà, ñâåä¸ííûå â ñèíîíèìû â èçâåñòíîé ðåâèçèè âòîðíî ýòè ïàóêè íå ñìîãëè èç-çà êîíêóðåíöèè ñî ÷åòû Ãåðáåðòà è Ëîðíû Ëåâè [Levi & Levi, 1962], è ñòîðîíû íà÷àâøèõ ïðîöâåòàòü Linyphiidae è The- îïèñàòü íîâûå ðîäà.  ýòîé ÷àñòè êíèãè îïèñàíû ridiidae. Ôîðìèðîâàíèå (îáðàçîâàíèå, ñòàíîâëåíèå) îäíî íîâîå ïîäñåìåéñòâî, 5 íîâûõ òðèá (â àáñòðàê- ñåìåéñòâ Linyphiidae è Theridiidae, êàê è Salticidae, òå îòìå÷åíî
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Protocol for Online Documentation of Spider Biodiversity Inventories Applied to a Mexican Tropical Wet Forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae)
    Zootaxa 4722 (3): 241–269 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4722.3.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6AC6E70B-6E6A-4D46-9C8A-2260B929E471 A protocol for online documentation of spider biodiversity inventories applied to a Mexican tropical wet forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae) FERNANDO ÁLVAREZ-PADILLA1, 2, M. ANTONIO GALÁN-SÁNCHEZ1 & F. JAVIER SALGUEIRO- SEPÚLVEDA1 1Laboratorio de Aracnología, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Biología Comparada, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n, Colonia Copilco el Bajo. C. P. 04510. Del. Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México. E-mail: [email protected] 2Corresponding author Abstract Spider community inventories have relatively well-established standardized collecting protocols. Such protocols set rules for the orderly acquisition of samples to estimate community parameters and to establish comparisons between areas. These methods have been tested worldwide, providing useful data for inventory planning and optimal sampling allocation efforts. The taxonomic counterpart of biodiversity inventories has received considerably less attention. Species lists and their relative abundances are the only link between the community parameters resulting from a biotic inventory and the biology of the species that live there. However, this connection is lost or speculative at best for species only partially identified (e. g., to genus but not to species). This link is particularly important for diverse tropical regions were many taxa are undescribed or little known such as spiders. One approach to this problem has been the development of biodiversity inventory websites that document the morphology of the species with digital images organized as standard views.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Material
    10.1071/ZO20023_AC ©CSIRO 2019 Australian Journal of Zoology 2019, 67(3), 162-172 Supplementary Material Evolutionary biogeography of Australian jumping spider genera (Araneae: Salticidae) Barry J. Richardson Australian National Insect Collection, National Research Collections Australia, CSIRO, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia. Email: [email protected] Table S1 Integrated data set derived from Bodner and Maddison,(2012), Zhang and Maddison (2015), Richardson, Whyte & Zabka (2019). Age Australian Maximum Total Mesic Sclerophyllous Monsoonal Genus Origin (mya) species Macrohabitat Microhabitat length RLU RLU RLU RLU Abracadabrella Zabka, 1991 Endemic 3 d&g&w&o&c f&t 7 20 9 9 2 Adoxotoma Simon, 1909 Endemic 9 d&o&c t&r 6 8 8 Afraflacilla Berland & Millot, Partial 6 d&g&w f&t&l 8 18 5 10 3 1941 Ananeon Richardson, 2013 Endemic 1 o&c l 5 1 1 Apricia Richardson, 2016 Endemic 8.3 3 d&g&w&o&c f&t 10 17 13 4 Arasia Simon, 1901 Endemic 19.5 2 o&c t&l 9 13 13 Astia L. Koch, 1879 Endemic 1 w&o&c t&l 9 13 13 Astilodes Zabka, 2009 Endemic 1 c f 7 4 4 Barraina Richardson, 2013 Endemic 1 w&o&c l 3 8 8 Bavia Simon, 1877 Partial 18 4 w&o&c f 13 11 11 Abbreviations: Macrohabitat; d desert, g grassland, w woodland etc, o open forest, c closed forest Microhabitat; f foliage, t trunk (bark), l litter (ground), g grass Biomes: RLU Regional Landscape Units Table S1 (continued) Age Australian Maximum Total Mesic Sclerophyllous Monsoonal Genus Origin (mya) species Macrohabitat Microhabitat length RLU RLU RLU RLU Bianor Peckham & Shared 2 d&g&w f&t 3 20 11 9 Peckham, 1886 Canama Simon, 1903 Partial 21.5 1 w 8 3 3 Chalcolecta Simon, 1884 Shared 1 d&g&w&o&c 8 1 1 Clynotis Simon, 1901 Endemic 1 d&g&w&o&c f&t&g 9 24 14 6 4 Cocalus C.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts
    August 20th-25th, 2017 University of Nottingham – UK with thanks to: Organising Committee Sara Goodacre, University of Nottingham, UK Dmitri Logunov, Manchester Museum, UK Geoff Oxford, University of York, UK Tony Russell-Smith, British Arachnological Society, UK Yuri Marusik, Russian Academy of Science, Russia Helpers Leah Ashley, Tom Coekin, Ella Deutsch, Rowan Earlam, Alastair Gibbons, David Harvey, Antje Hundertmark, LiaQue Latif, Michelle Strickland, Emma Vincent, Sarah Goertz. Congress logo designed by Michelle Strickland. We thank all sponsors and collaborators for their support British Arachnological Society, European Society of Arachnology, Fisher Scientific, The Genetics Society, Macmillan Publishing, PeerJ, Visit Nottinghamshire Events Team Content General Information 1 Programme Schedule 4 Poster Presentations 13 Abstracts 17 List of Participants 140 Notes 154 Foreword We are delighted to welcome you to the University of Nottingham for the 30th European Congress of Arachnology. We hope that whilst you are here, you will enjoy exploring some of the parks and gardens in the University’s landscaped settings, which feature long-established woodland as well as contemporary areas such as the ‘Millennium Garden’. There will be a guided tour in the evening of Tuesday 22nd August to show you different parts of the campus that you might enjoy exploring during the time that you are here. Registration Registration will be from 8.15am in room A13 in the Pope Building (see map below). We will have information here about the congress itself as well as the city of Nottingham in general. Someone should be at this registration point throughout the week to answer your Questions. Please do come and find us if you have any Queries.
    [Show full text]
  • Athamas Whitmeei from the Western Pacific 1
    Peckhamia 165.1 Athamas whitmeei from the Western Pacific 1 PECKHAMIA 165.1, 24 April 2018, 1―5 ISSN 2161―8526 (print) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1726EF3C-7E10-4E92-A408-A7174AEA887B (registered 22 APR 2018) ISSN 1944―8120 (online) Athamas whitmeei (Araneae: Salticidae: Euophryini) from islands of the tropical Western Pacific Region David E. Hill 1 and Felix Fleck 2 1 213 Wild Horse Creek Drive, Simpsonville, South Carolina, 29680 USA, email [email protected] 2 www.felixfleckonline.com The salticid genus Athamas O. Pickard-Cambridge 1877 presently includes seven named species (WSC 2018; see also Appendix 1 for a detailed list), widely distributed in the Western Pacific from the Caroline Islands in the west to the Pitcairn Islands in the east. The type species for this genus, A. whitmeei O. Pickard-Cambridge 1877, has been reported throughout the entire range of distribution for the genus (Figure 1). In their review of Athamas, Berry et al. (1996) noted that most of the other species placed in Athamas were known only from isolated specimens, and that A. whitmeei populations exhibited a range of character expression that might include variants used to define other species in the genus. Benton & Lehtinen (1995) suggested that there was only one species in the genus, but two additional species have since been described. 1 A. debakkeri 2 A. guineensis Guam 8 3 A. kochi Eniwetok 8 4 A. nitidus Yap 8 Ulithi 8 Kwajalein 8 5 A. proszynskii Koror Is. 5 8 Truk 6 A. tahitensis Palau 8 8 Ponape 8 Majuro 8 Kosrae 7 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article
    Ecologica Montenegrina 18: 26-74 (2018) This journal is available online at: www.biotaxa.org/em https://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AF50CFA8-DF48-455F-A2E6-DE36742E8CC1 Taxonomic survey of the genera Euophrys, Pseudeuophrys and Talavera, with description of Euochin gen. n. (Araneae: Salticidae) and with proposals of a new research protocol*1 JERZY PRÓSZYŃSKI1, JØRGEN LISSNER2 & MICHAEL SCHÄFER3 1Professor Emeritus, Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences ul. Wilcza 63, 00-679 Warsaw, Poland. E-mail: [email protected] 2Natural History Museum Aarhus Wilhelm Meyers Allé 10 Universitetsparken, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] 3Hochlandstr. 64, 12589 Berlin Deutschland. E-mail: [email protected] Received 14 May 2018 │ Accepted by V. Pešić: 23 June 2018 │ Published online 4 July 2018. Abstract The paper presents comparison of main diagnostic characters of all recognizable species of genera Euophrys C.L. Koch, 1834, Pseudeuophrys Dahl, 1912 and Talavera Peckham & Peckham, 1909, also delimiting new genus Euochin from China. All that purports to illustrate the current state of classification suggests progress and improvements. Discussed postulates include adding color macrophotograps of live specimens to the routine tools of research, and routine use of precisely documented palps and internal structures of epigyne. Implementation of the above will require change of research protocol of all Salticidae, the conclusions drawn are applicable to studies of other families of spiders. New taxa described. Gen. Euochin gen. n. Subgroup of genera EUOPHRYEAE new. Nomenclatorical corrections documented Euophrys monadnock: Edwards, 1980: 12 (S, in part). = Euophrys nearctica Kaston, 1938c (removal from synonymy, documented - Figs 12B-C with E, as well as relevant facsimiles Figs 32-33).
    [Show full text]
  • Araneae: Salticidae) from Altai, South Siberia, Russia
    © Entomologica Fennica. 19 March 2018 A new species of Chalcoscirtus (Araneae: Salticidae) from Altai, South Siberia, Russia Yuri M. Marusik, Alexander A. Fomichev & Varpu Vahtera Marusik, Y. M., Fomichev, A. A. & Vahtera, V. 2018: A new species of Chalco- scirtus (Araneae: Salticidae) from Altai, South Siberia, Russia. — Entomol. Fen- nica 29: 39–48. A new species, Chalcoscirtus sinevi sp. n., from the Altai Mountains (South Si- beria) is described on the basis of both sexes. The new species is closely related to C. grishkanae Marusik, 1988 from North-Eastern Siberia and Transbaikalia, which is also illustrated. Molecular evidences supporting a separate species sta- tus of the new species are provided. Y. M. Marusik, Institute for Biological Problems of the North RAS, Portovaya Str. 18, Magadan 685000, Russia; Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa; E-mail: [email protected] A. A. Fomichev, Altai State University, Lenina Pr., 61, Barnaul, RF-656049, Rus- sia; E-mail: [email protected] V. Vahtera, Biodiversity Unit, Zoological Museum, University of Turku, FI- 20014 Turku, Finland; E-mail: [email protected] Received 23 January 2017, accepted 24 May 2017 1. Introduction While studying newly collected material from Altai we found specimens of Chalcoscirtus that Chalcoscirtus Bertkau, 1880 is a Holarctic Salti- belong to an undescribed species very similar to cinae genus, which currently includes 45 species C. grishkanae Marusik, 1988, which is known (World Spider Catalog 2017). The majority of the from upper reaches of the Kolyma River, envi- species occur in high mountains of Europe, Cen- rons of Magadan in Northeastern Siberia and tral Asia and Northeastern Siberia and most of from Transbaikalia (Logunov & Marusik 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Araneae, Salticidae), Using Anchored Hybrid Enrichment
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 695: 89–101 (2017) Genome-wide phylogeny of Salticidae 89 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.695.13852 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A genome-wide phylogeny of jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae), using anchored hybrid enrichment Wayne P. Maddison1,2, Samuel C. Evans1, Chris A. Hamilton3,4,5, Jason E. Bond3,4, Alan R. Lemmon6, Emily Moriarty Lemmon7 1 Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada 2 Department of Botany and Beaty Biodiversity Museum, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada 3 Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA 4 Auburn University Museum of Natural History, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA 5 Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 3215 Hull Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32611 6 Department of Scientific Computing, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA 7 Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA Corresponding author: Wayne Maddison ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Miller | Received 31 May 2017 | Accepted 16 August 2017 | Published 4 September 2017 http://zoobank.org/0C9E5956-2CDB-4BC5-9DCA-AFDC7538A692 Citation: Maddison WP, Evans SC, Hamilton CA, Bond JE, Lemmon AR, Lemmon EM (2017) A genome-wide phylogeny of jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae), using anchored hybrid enrichment. ZooKeys 695: 89–101. https:// doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.695.13852 Abstract We present the first genome-wide molecular phylogeny of jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae), inferred from Anchored Hybrid Enrichment (AHE) sequence data. From 12 outgroups plus 34 salticid taxa rep- resenting all but one subfamily and most major groups recognized in previous work, we obtained 447 loci totalling 96,946 aligned nucleotide sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Salticidae: Maratus), with Implications for the Evolution of Male Courtship Displays
    applyparastyle “fig//caption/p[1]” parastyle “FigCapt” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, XX, 1–24. With 6 figures. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/advance-article/doi/10.1093/biolinnean/blaa165/6126965 by University of California, Berkeley user on 05 February 2021 Phylogenomics of peacock spiders and their kin (Salticidae: Maratus), with implications for the evolution of male courtship displays MADELINE B. GIRARD1, DAMIAN O. ELIAS1,*, , GUILHERME AZEVEDO2, KE BI3, MICHAEL M. KASUMOVIC4, , JULIANNE M. WALDOCK5, ERICA BREE ROSENBLUM1 and MARSHAL HEDIN2 1Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-3114, USA 2Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182-4614, USA 3Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-3160, USA 4Ecology & Evolution Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences, UNSW, Sydney, 2052, NSW, Australia 5Collections and Research, Western Australian Museum, 49 Kew Street, Welshpool, 6106, Western Australia, Australia Received 7 July 2020; revised 16 September 2020; accepted for publication 22 September 2020 Understanding diversity has been a pursuit in evolutionary biology since its inception. A challenge arises when sexual selection has played a role in diversification. Questions of what constitutes a ‘species’, homoplasy vs. synapomorphy, and whether sexually selected traits show phylogenetic signal have hampered work on many systems. Peacock spiders are famous for sexually selected male courtship dances and peacock-like abdominal ornamentation. This lineage of jumping spiders currently includes over 90 species classified into two genera, Maratus and Saratus. Most Maratus species have been placed into groups based on secondary sexual characters, but evolutionary relationships remain unresolved.
    [Show full text]
  • Mello-Leitão, 1945) (Araneae: Salticidae: Thiodinini
    Peckhamia 238.1 synonym of Titanattus parvus 1 PECKHAMIA 238.1, 4 June 2021, 1―4 ISSN 2161―8526 (print) LSID urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D3CD7F12-20E1-470B-AE01-AC14AB1FCA54 (registered 02 JUN 2021) ISSN 1944―8120 (online) A new synonym of Titanattus parvus (Mello-Leitão, 1945) (Araneae: Salticidae: Thiodinini) Gonzalo D. Rubio1 1National Research Council of Argentina (CONICET), Experimental Station of Agriculture (EEA-INTA), R 14, Km 836, Cerro Azul, Misiones, Argentina, email [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4223-2980 Abstract. Most thiodinines are rare in collections, and this can lead to fragmented knowledge and some mistakes. In this brief contribution Titanattus acanjuba Bustamante & Ruiz is newly synonymized with T. parvus (Mello-Leita@o) and is illustrated by new photographs and drawings. Diagnostic characters for its recognition are provided. Keywords. jumping spider, thiodinines, Titanattus acanjuba Introduction Bustamante and Ruiz (2017) took a first big step towards understanding the diversity of the tribe Thiodinini Simon, 1901. Spiders of this tribe seem to have a widespread distribution in the Americas, from southern United States to southern Chile (Bustamante & Ruiz, 2017). Nevertheless, thiodinines are rare in collections, and this can lead to fragmented knowledge and some mistakes. In 1945 Mello-Leita@o described the thiodinine species Nebridia parva Mello-Leita@o, 1945 based on only one female from southern Misiones, Argentina. For a long time (70 years) this species was under the genus Nebridia Simon, 1902 until a molecular analysis resulted in synonymy with the euophryine Amphidraus Simon, 1900 (Zhang & Maddison, 2015). This was rejected by ProFszynF ski (2017) for the lack of support by diagnostic drawings of respective type species.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Biogeography of Australian Jumping Spider Genera (Araneae : Salticidae)
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Australian Journal of Zoology, 2019, 67, 162–172 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO20023 Evolutionary biogeography of Australian jumping spider genera (Araneae : Salticidae) Barry J. Richardson Australian National Insect Collection, National Research Collections Australia, CSIRO, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Phylogenetic relationships and estimated dates of origin, plus distributional, ecological and morphological data for salticid genera were used to examine a series of hypotheses related to the evolution of the Australian salticid fauna. Though independent, the time patterns of evolution of genera in Australia and South America were similar, while that for Northern Hemisphere taxa differed. In each case the production of new genera occurred during the warmer parts of the mid Tertiary but not during cooler and drier times. Asian elements entered Australia as early as 31 million years ago, long before the collision of the Australasian and Asian continental plates. Endemic and derivatives of Asian genera were similarly distributed across Australian biomes. However, arriving taxa were more successful when conditions matched their mesic origins (tropical), but less so when different (temperate). While endemic genera often extended their ranges into drier environments by increasing the number of species, recent arrivals did so by extending the range of individual species. Maximum Parsimony analyses of a range of presumed adaptive, morphological and ecological characters showed these did not reflect genus-level processes; however, the analysis did show all endemic genera had mesic origins. Additional keywords: Gondwana, macroevolution, Miocene fauna, Oligocene fauna, South America, spiders. Received 29 April 2020, accepted 13 July 2020, published online 28 July 2020 Introduction following way (Byrne et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Saratus Otto & Hill 2017
    Saratus Otto & Hill 2017 Taxonomy Saratus has one Australian species, Saratus hesperus. It is part of a distinct group of Australian genera related to the Old World genus Saitis (Zhang and Maddison 2015) including Barraina, Hypoblemum, Jotus, Maratus and Prostheclina (Otto and Hill, 2012, Zhang and Maddison, 2015) (Maddison et al 2008). Further information on the genus and described species can be found in Otto and Hill (2017) and depicted on p. 271 of Whyte and Anderson (2017) as ‘White-dot’ ACT. Description Examples of live Saratus hesperus Saratus is a small-sized spider, body length 3 to 4 mm. Males have a brightly-coloured ovate Illustrator (and ©) M. Duncan abdomen. Females have drably-coloured ovate abdomens. The head, viewed from above, is rectangular with rounded sides or slightly pear-shaped with the widest point behind the posterior lateral eyes. The carapace is high, the highest point at the posterior lateral eyes. Chelicerae have a single (unident) sharp retromarginal tooth and two promarginal teeth. The first legs are similar in shape to the other legs. The third and fourth legs are of a similar size in the male and there is no fringing along the third leg. The fourth leg is longest in the females. The male’s palpal tibia has a single, pointed, medium-sized retro-lateral tibial apophysis. The tegulum is long with a proximal lobe. The short embolus is distal to the tegulum. It has an anticlockwise twist and winds around a separate sclerite. Aspects of the general morphology of Females have two small, epigynal atria without sclerotised guides.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of the Australian Peacock Spiders (Araneae: Salticidae: Euophryini: Maratus, Saratus), Version 2
    Peckhamia 148.2 Catalogue of peacock spiders 1 PECKHAMIA 148.2, 15 September 2017, 1―24 ISSN 2161―8526 (print) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:57925A87-9063-425E-AB9A-1DEC3696AA38 (registered 7 SEP 2017) ISSN 1944―8120 (online) Catalogue of the Australian peacock spiders (Araneae: Salticidae: Euophryini: Maratus, Saratus), version 2 Jürgen C. Otto 1 and David E. Hill 2 119 Grevillea Avenue, St. Ives, New South Wales 2075, Australia, email [email protected] 2213 Wild Horse Creek Drive, Simpsonville, SC 29680-6513, USA, email [email protected] Presently the Australian peacock spiders are assigned to two genera, Maratus Karsch 1878 and Saratus Otto & Hill 2017 (see Otto & Hill 2017a). Whereas only a single species of Saratus has been described, the genus Maratus includes a diverse variety of at least 65 described species endemic to Australia. After we synonymized the genus Lycidas Karsch 1878 with Maratus (Otto & Hill 2012c) a number of species previously associated with Lycidas by Żabka (1987) have been carried under Maratus with an unresolved status. Some are insufficiently known to determine the genus to which they should be assigned, others lack the characters that we associate with peacock spiders but have not yet been assigned to another genus. Only described species and none of the unresolved species are listed here. Thus this catalogue should be viewed as a work in progress. Only adult males are shown in photographs below. Each range map shows areas that have been identified in prior publications (white circles), or by unpublished observations and posted photographs that we consider reliable (yellow circles).
    [Show full text]