DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2101.05282V3 [Astro-Ph.SR] 2 Feb 2021 at Angular Separations Greater Than About One Arcsecond, Wide Et Al

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2101.05282V3 [Astro-Ph.SR] 2 Feb 2021 at Angular Separations Greater Than About One Arcsecond, Wide Et Al MNRAS 000,1–26 (2021) Preprint 3 February 2021 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 A million binaries from Gaia eDR3: sample selection and validation of Gaia parallax uncertainties Kareem El-Badry,1,2¢ Hans-Walter Rix,2 and Tyler M. Heintz3 1Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Astrophysics Center, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 2Max-Planck Institute for Astronomy, Königstuhl 17, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany 3Department of Astronomy, Boston University, 725 Commonwealth Ave., Boston, MA 02215, US Accepted to MNRAS ABSTRACT We construct from Gaia eDR3 an extensive catalog of spatially resolved binary stars within ≈ 1 kpc of the Sun, with projected separations ranging from a few au to 1 pc. We estimate the probability that each pair is a chance alignment empirically, using the Gaia catalog itself to calculate the rate of chance alignments as a function of observables. The catalog contains 1.3 (1.1) million binaries with >90% (>99%) probability of being bound, including 16,000 white dwarf – main sequence (WD+MS) binaries and 1,400 WD+WD binaries. We make the full catalog publicly available, as well as the queries and code to produce it. We then use this sample to calibrate the published Gaia DR3 parallax uncertainties, making use of the binary components’ near-identical parallaxes. We show that these uncertainties are generally reliable for faint stars (퐺 & 18), but are underestimated significantly for brighter stars. The underestimates are generally ≤ 30% for isolated sources with well-behaved astrometry, but are larger (up to ∼80%) for apparently well-behaved sources with a companion within . 4 arcsec, and much larger for sources with poor astrometric fits. We provide an empirical fitting function to inflate published fs values for isolated sources. The public catalog offers wide ranging follow-up opportunities: from calibrating spectroscopic surveys, to precisely constraining ages of field stars, to the masses and the initial-final mass relation of white dwarfs, to dynamically probing the Galactic tidal field. Key words: binaries: visual – stars: evolution – methods: statistical – catalogues – parallaxes 1 INTRODUCTION genuine binaries, in which the two stars have nearly identical proper motions (e.g. Luyten 1971, 1979; Salim & Gould 2003; Chanamé & About half of all solar-type stars are members of binary systems, and Gould 2004; Dhital et al. 2010). Many wide binary searches have a majority of these are so widely separated that the two components specifically targeted high-proper motion stars, which have fewer never interact (e.g. Moe & Di Stefano 2017). With orbital periods phase-space neighbors that can be mistaken for binary companions. ranging from ∼10 to ∼ 108 years, most of these binaries can in If available, parallaxes and radial velocities are also useful for dis- some sense be viewed as clusters of two: the components formed tinguishing binaries from chance alignments (e.g. Close et al. 1990; from the same gas cloud and have orbited one another ever since. Andrews et al. 2017). They thus have essentially the same age, initial composition, and distance, but generally different masses and occasionally different Prior to the Gaia mission (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2016), useful evolutionary phases. This makes wide binaries useful for calibrating parallaxes for this purpose were only available for (relatively) small stellar models as well as spectroscopic and astrometric surveys. samples of nearby and bright stars. Gaia DR2 (Gaia Collaboration arXiv:2101.05282v3 [astro-ph.SR] 2 Feb 2021 At angular separations greater than about one arcsecond, wide et al. 2018) dramatically expanded the sample of stars with well- binaries are easily resolvable as two point sources. Distinguishing measured parallaxes and proper motions, enabling the construction of physically bound binary stars from chance alignments (“optical dou- unprecedentedly pure and extensive wide binary samples. El-Badry bles”) has been a long-standing challenge for binary star astronomy. & Rix(2018, hereafter ER18) searched Gaia DR2 for pairs of stars Indeed, the first systematic binary star catalog was constructed under within 200 pc of the Sun with parallaxes and proper motions consis- the assumption that all close pairs were chance alignments (Her- tent with being gravitationally bound, and projected separations of schel 1782), an assumption that was only shown to be incorrect two up to 50,000 AU (0.24 pc). Their catalog prioritized purity over com- decades later (Herschel 1803). pleteness, and thus imposed relatively strict cuts on astrometric and For bright binaries at close angular separations, chance alignments photometric quality and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). This resulted in can be excluded probabilistically. However, the contamination rate a catalog of ∼ 55, 000 binaries with an estimated contamination rate from chance alignments increases at wider separations and fainter of ∼ 0.1%. magnitudes. Inclusion of proper motion data can aid the selection of Using the same basic strategy but less stringent cuts on astrometric SNR, Tian et al.(2020) extended the ER18 binary search to larger distances (3 < 4 kpc) and wider separations (B < 1 pc). This pro- ¢ E-mail: [email protected] duced a substantially larger sample of ∼ 800, 000 binary candidates, © 2021 The Authors 2 El-Badry et al. but with a higher contamination rate: chance-alignments dominate and parallax_over_error > 5 their catalog at B & 20, 000 au, though higher-purity subsamples can and parallax_error < 2 be selected by imposing stricter cuts on astrometric SNR. Their cat- and phot_g_mean_mag is not null alog contained 325,000 binaries with B < 20, 000 au; it is expected to be reasonably pure in this separation regime. The query returns a total of # = 64, 407, 853 sources, corresponding Another binary catalog was produced by Hartman & Lépine to # ¹# ¸ 1º/2 ≈ 2 × 1015 possible pairs. Of these, we consider as (2020), who combined Gaia DR2 astrometry with a catalog of high- initial binary candidates all pairs that satisfy the following: proper motion stars not contained in Gaia DR2. In order to reduce • Projected separation less than 1 parsec: the angular separation contamination from chance alignments, they limited their search to between the two stars, \, must satisfy binaries with proper motions larger than 40 mas yr−1; this translates \ s to a distance limit of order 200 pc for typical stars in the Galactic ≤ 206.265 × 1 , (1) disk, but to a larger search volume for stars on halo-like orbits with arcsec mas large tangential velocities. Their primary binary catalog contains where s1 is the parallax of the star with the brighter 퐺 magnitude. ∼ 100, 000 binary candidates, with projected separations as large as The maximum search radius of 1 pc (corresponding to an orbital 10 pc. period of ∼ 108 years) is chosen because a vanishingly small number In this paper, we use Gaia eDR3 data (Gaia Collaboration et al. of bound binaries are expected to exist at separations wider than this, 2020a) to further expand the sample of known wide binaries. Com- where the Galactic tidal field becomes comparable to the gravita- pared to DR2, eDR3 astrometry is based on a ∼1.5 × longer time tional attraction of the two stars (e.g. Binney & Tremaine 2008). The baseline. This yields significant improvements in parallax and espe- separation beyond which the Galactic tidal field dominates a binary’s cially proper motion uncertainties. For example, the median uncer- internal acceleration is called the Jacobi radius. In the Solar neigh- parallax pmra tainties in and (one-dimenstional proper motion) at borhood, it is given by A퐽 ≈ 1.35 pc × ¹"tot/" º, where "tot is 퐺 = 18 have respectively improved from 0.165 mas to 0.120 mas, the total mass of the binary (Jiang & Tremaine 2010). At separations −1 −1 and from 0.280 mas yr to 0.123 mas yr (Lindegren et al. 2018, slightly below A퐽 , binaries are efficiently disrupted by gravitational 2020b). Improvements at the bright end are more significant, due to perturbations from objects such as other stars and molecular clouds better handling of systematics; i.e., at 퐺 = 13, the median parallax (e.g. Weinberg et al. 1987). uncertainty decreased from 0.029 mas to 0.015 mas. This improved • Parallaxes consistent within 3 (or 6) sigma: the parallaxes of astrometric precision allows us to distinguish bound binaries from the two components, s1 and s2, must satisfy chance alignments to larger distances and wider separations than q was possible with DR2. Our approach is a compromise between the j − j 2 ¸ 2 s1 s2 < 1 fs,1 fs,2, (2) strategies adopted by Tian et al.(2020) and ER18. Like Tian et al. (2020), we search out to wide separations and relatively low astro- where fs,8 is the parallax uncertainty of the 8-th component, and metric SNR, so that at wide separations and faint magnitudes, the 1 = 3 for pairs with \¡ 4 arcsec, or 1 = 6 for pairs with \ < 4 full catalog is dominated by chance alignments. However, we also arcsec. The less stringent cut at \ < 4 arcsec is adopted because empirically estimate and assign each binary a probability that it is a the chance alignment rate there is low and parallax uncertainties are chance alignment, making it straightforward to select pure subsets of significantly underestimated at close angular separations (Section5). the catalog. • Proper motions consistent with a Keplerian orbit: The two stars The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. In Section2, we in a wide binary will have proper motions that are similar, but, due describe how our binary candidate sample is selected and cleaned. to orbital motion, not identical. We require Section3 describes how we quantify the contamination rate from Δ` ≤ Δ` ¸ 2f , (3) chance alignments and estimate the probability that each binary can- orbit Δ` didate is bound. Section4 details basic properties of the catalog and where Δ` is the observed scalar proper motion difference, fΔ` its a cross-match with the LAMOST survey.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Dunhuang Chinese Sky: a Comprehensive Study of the Oldest Known Star Atlas
    25/02/09JAHH/v4 1 THE DUNHUANG CHINESE SKY: A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF THE OLDEST KNOWN STAR ATLAS JEAN-MARC BONNET-BIDAUD Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique ,Centre de Saclay, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France E-mail: [email protected] FRANÇOISE PRADERIE Observatoire de Paris, 61 Avenue de l’Observatoire, F- 75014 Paris, France E-mail: [email protected] and SUSAN WHITFIELD The British Library, 96 Euston Road, London NW1 2DB, UK E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: This paper presents an analysis of the star atlas included in the medieval Chinese manuscript (Or.8210/S.3326), discovered in 1907 by the archaeologist Aurel Stein at the Silk Road town of Dunhuang and now held in the British Library. Although partially studied by a few Chinese scholars, it has never been fully displayed and discussed in the Western world. This set of sky maps (12 hour angle maps in quasi-cylindrical projection and a circumpolar map in azimuthal projection), displaying the full sky visible from the Northern hemisphere, is up to now the oldest complete preserved star atlas from any civilisation. It is also the first known pictorial representation of the quasi-totality of the Chinese constellations. This paper describes the history of the physical object – a roll of thin paper drawn with ink. We analyse the stellar content of each map (1339 stars, 257 asterisms) and the texts associated with the maps. We establish the precision with which the maps are drawn (1.5 to 4° for the brightest stars) and examine the type of projections used.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraining the Masses of Microlensing Black Holes and the Mass Gap with Gaia DR2 Łukasz Wyrzykowski1 and Ilya Mandel2,3,4
    A&A 636, A20 (2020) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935842 & c ESO 2020 Astrophysics Constraining the masses of microlensing black holes and the mass gap with Gaia DR2 Łukasz Wyrzykowski1 and Ilya Mandel2,3,4 1 Warsaw University Astronomical Observatory, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warszawa, Poland e-mail: [email protected] 2 Monash Centre for Astrophysics, School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia 3 OzGrav: The ARC Center of Excellence for Gravitational Wave Discovery, Australia 4 Institute of Gravitational Wave Astronomy and School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK Received 6 May 2019 / Accepted 27 January 2020 ABSTRACT Context. Gravitational microlensing is sensitive to compact-object lenses in the Milky Way, including white dwarfs, neutron stars, or black holes, and could potentially probe a wide range of stellar-remnant masses. However, the mass of the lens can be determined only in very limited cases, due to missing information on both source and lens distances and their proper motions. Aims. Our aim is to improve the mass estimates in the annual parallax microlensing events found in the eight years of OGLE-III observations towards the Galactic Bulge with the use of Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2). Methods. We use Gaia DR2 data on distances and proper motions of non-blended sources and recompute the masses of lenses in parallax events. We also identify new events in that sample which are likely to have dark lenses; the total number of such events is now 18. Results.
    [Show full text]
  • New Wide Common Proper Motion Binaries
    Vol. 6 No. 1 January 1, 2010 Journal of Double Star Observations Page 30 New Wide Common Proper Motion Binaries Rafael Benavides1,2, Francisco Rica2,3, Esteban Reina4, Julio Castellanos5, Ramón Naves6, Luis Lahuerta7, Salvador Lahuerta7 1. Astronomical Society of Córdoba, Observatory of Posadas, MPC-IAU Code J53, C/.Gaitán nº 20, 1º, 14730 Posadas (Spain) 2. Double Star Section of Liga Iberoamericana de Astronomía (LIADA), Avda. Almirante Guillermo Brown No. 4998, 3000 Santa Fe (Argentina) 3. Astronomical Society of Mérida, C/José Ruíz Azorín, 14, 4º D, 06800 Mérida (Spain) 4. Plza. Mare de Dèu de Montserrat, 1 Etlo 2ªB, 08901 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat (Spain) 5. 0bservatory with MPC-IAU Code 939, Av. Primado Reig 183, 46020 Valencia (Spain) 6. Observatory of Montcabrer, MPC-IAU Code 213, C/Jaume Balmes, 24, 08348 Cabrils (Spain) 7. G.E.O.D.A., Observatorio Manises, MPC-IAU Code J98, C/ Mayor, 111-4, 46940 Manises (Spain) Abstract: In this work we report the discovery of 150 new double stars of which 142 are wide common proper motion stellar systems. In addition to this, we report the study of 23 recently catalogued wide common proper motion binaries discovered by other observers. Spectral types, photometric distances, kinematics and ages were determined from data ob- tained consulting the literature. Several criteria were used to determine the nature of each double star. Orbital periods and the semimajor axes were calculated. they are good sensors to detect unknown mass concen- 1. Introduction trations that they may encounter along their galactic For several years double-star amateurs have con- trajectories.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 8: Stellar Motions Reading: Box 19-1
    Lecture 8: Stellar Motions Reading: Box 19-1 Key Ideas The stars are in constant motion. Observed Motions Proper motions (motion against the background, measured in angular motion/time) Radial velocities (motion towards or away, measured from the Doppler shift) True Space Motion Combination of radial velocity, proper motion, and distance (important for proper motion!) The “Fixed” Stars Although the stars are moving, their motions across the sky are so small that to the naked eye, the stars appear “fixed” to the sky. Great distances make the amount of motion small on human lifetimes. (Of course, stars moving directly away or towards us will not to appear to move across the sky) Proper Motions Apparent angular motion across the sky of nearby stars with respect to distant objects. (Distant stars are used because we assume that even though they are moving through space they are so far away that from our perspective they are fixed). It is the projection of the star’s true motion through space relative to the Sun. Typical proper motion for stars in the solar neighborhood is about 0.1 arcsec/year Largest proper motion measured is 10.25 arcsec/year Barnard’s Star) Proper motions are cumulative. Effects build up over time. The longer you wait, the greater apparent angular motion is. Measuring proper motions: Compare photos of the sky taken 20 to 50 years apart Measure how much stars have moved compared to more distant background objects (galaxies, quasars). Example: if a star has a proper motion of 0.1 arcsec/year: In one year, it moves 0.1 arcsec In 10 years, it moves 10x0.1= 1 arcsec In 100 years, it moves 100x0.1 =10 arcsec It can take a long time for the constellations to noticeably change shape.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1703.10167V1
    Draft version April 9, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 08/22/09 ON THE ORIGIN OF SUB-SUBGIANT STARS. I. DEMOGRAPHICS Aaron M. Geller1,2,†,∗, Emily M. Leiner3, Andrea Bellini4, Robert Gleisinger5,6, Daryl Haggard5, Sebastian Kamann7, Nathan W. C. Leigh8, Robert D. Mathieu3, Alison Sills9, Laura L. Watkins4, David Zurek8,10 1Center for Interdisciplinary Exploration and Research in Astrophysics (CIERA) and Department of Physics & Astronomy, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Rd., Evanston, IL 60201, USA; 2Adler Planetarium, Dept. of Astronomy, 1300 S. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605, USA; 3Department of Astronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI 53706, USA; 4Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; 5Department of Physics, McGill University, McGill Space Institute, 3550 University Street, Montreal, QC H3A 2A7, Canada; 6Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada; 7Institut f¨ur Astrophysik, Universit¨at G¨ottingen, Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1, 37077 G¨ottingen, Germany; 8Department of Astrophysics, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West and 79th Street, New York, NY 10024; 9Department of Physics and Astronomy, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4M1, Canada; 10Visiting Researcher, NRC – Herzberg Astronomy and Astrophysics, National Research Council of Canada, 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, British Columbia V9E 2E7, Canada Draft version April 9, 2018 ABSTRACT Sub-subgiants are stars observed to be redder than normal main-sequence stars and fainter than normal subgiant (and giant) stars in an optical color-magnitude diagram. The red straggler stars, which lie redward of the red giant branch, may be related and are often grouped together with the sub-subgiants in the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Near IR Astrometry of Magnetars Shriharsh P
    Neutron Stars and Pulsars: Challenges and Opportunities after 80 years Proceedings IAU Symposium No. 291, 2012 c International Astronomical Union 2013 J. van Leeuwen, ed. doi:10.1017/S1743921312024702 Near IR Astrometry of Magnetars Shriharsh P. Tendulkar Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology email: [email protected] Abstract. We report on the progress of our five-year program for astrometric monitoring of mag- netars using high-resolution NIR observations using the laser guide star adaptive optics (LGS- AO) supported NIRC2 camera on the 10-meter Keck telescope. We have measured the proper motion of two of the youngest magnetars, SGR 1806−20 and SGR 1900+14, which have coun- terparts with K ∼21 mag, and have placed a preliminary upper limit on the motion of the young AXP 1E 1841−045. The precision of the proper motion measurement is at the milliarcsecond per year level. Our proper motion measurements now provide evidence to link SGR 1806−20 and SGR 1900+14 with neighboring young star clusters. At the distances of these magnetars, their proper motion corresponds to transverse space velocities of 350±100 km s−1 and 130±30 km s−1 respectively. The upper limit on the proper motion of AXP 1E 1841−045 is 160 km s−1 .With the sample of proper motions available, we conclude that the kinematics of the magnetar family are not distinct from that of pulsars. Keywords. infrared:stars,stars:neutron,techniques: high angular resolution, astrometry, instrumentation: adaptive optics 1. Introduction Magnetars or highly magnetized neutron stars were proposed by Thompson & Duncan (1996) as a unified model to explain the phenomena of soft gamma repeaters (SGRs) and anomalous X-ray pulsars (AXPs).
    [Show full text]
  • The Proper Motion of M31 Roeland Van Der Marel (Stsci)
    The Proper Motion of M31 Roeland van der Marel (STScI) (ApJ, July 2012) I: HST measurement (Sohn, Anderson & vdMarel) II: Implied velocity + LG mass (vdMarel et al.) III: MW-M31-M33 future (vdMarel, Besla, et al.) [Other collaborators: Fardal, Beaton, Guhathakurta, Brown, Cox] History • 1912: Slipher measures VLOS ; implies approach towards Milky Way at ~110 km/s Galactocentric • 1918: Barnard finds no dectable proper motion (PM) from observations started in 1898 • No successful subsequent proper motion measurements 2 • The MW and M31 protogalaxies started expanding radially outwards after the Big Bang • Subsequently started falling back Theory together due to their mutual gravity (timing argument) • Angular momentum induced by [Peebles et al. 2001] tidal torques from surrounding model Local Universe: Vtan < 200 km/s solutions • Millennium simulation MW-M31- like pairs (Li & White 2008) – median Vtan ~ 87 km/s • Action modeling shows many v possible solutions trans supergalactic coordinates wide range of possible orbits 3 Proper Motion Challenge • Relevant proper motions are small – 200 km/s at M31 = 55 μas/year – 40 km/s at M31 = 11 μas/year • Maser VLBI – 2014? – First discovered in M31 by Sjouwerman et al. (2010) and Darling (2011) – Some years of follow-up required • GAIA – 2018? – MW-optimized, but can measure bright uncrowded M31 stars • HST – now! – 200 km/s at M31 = 0.007 ACS/WFC pixels over 7 years 4 M31 HST Proper Motion Measurement • Three fields observed to great depth (>200 orbits)with ACS 2002-2004 to study MSTO (Brown et al.) – Spheroid – Outer Disk – Tidal Stream • Reobserved in 2010 for 9 orbits to determine proper motions.
    [Show full text]
  • On Gp Kuiper's Work on the Stars of Large Proper Motion
    ON G.P. KUIPER'S WORK ON THE STARS OF LARGE PROPER MOTION William P. Bidelman Warner and Swasey Observatory, Case Western Reserve University ABSTRACT The writer is preparing for publication a complete listing of the late G.P. Kuiperfs spectral classifications of stars of large proper motion north of δ=-50 . This work, resulting from his observations made at the Yerkes and McDonald Observatories some 35 years ago, has been only partially published; it is esti- mated that useful unpublished classifications exist for the order of 1000 stars. This paper discusses the background of his program and the procedures to be followed in making these data generally available. Kuiper's spectral classification program on the stars of large proper motion, which eventually comprised some 3500 objects observed during 1938-1944 at Yerkes and McDonald, represented a natural outgrowth of his earlier determination with the Lick Cross ley reflector of the colors of all known stars of large par- allax north of 6=-20° for which no spectral class nor color index was known. On reporting its completion, Kuiper (1935) states: "Next in importance to the stars of (known) large parallax, in a statistical study of the near-by stars, are the stars with large proper motions (but without known parallax). Annual proper motions of 0750 and larger invariably indicate interesting stars; they are either in the immediate neighborhood of the Sun, or pos- sess very high space velocities. The lower limit 0750 has been adopted in the present color program, but in future work the limit may well be taken as low as 074 or 073.
    [Show full text]
  • Proper Motion of a Star
    Page 1 of 7 Group Members: __________________ __________________ __________________ Proper Motion of a Star In this exercise you will measure the proper motion of Barnard’s Star and use it, with a given parallax and radial velocity, to determine the space motion of the star. Background information In 1718 Edmund Halley had noted that some stars were not fixed, but appeared to move in the sky relative to other stars. Arctures in Boötes and Sirius in Canis Major were the first stars detected by Halley to have proper motion. Proper motion is the angular change in position of a star across our line of sight, measured in arc seconds per year, and symbolized with the Greek letter “mu” μ. Proper motion is generally measured by taking photographs several years apart and measuring the movement of the image of a star with respect to more distant background stars over that time period. Usually decades must elapse between successive photographs before a reliable measurement can be made. The star with the largest proper motion was discovered by E. E. Barnard in 1916 at Yerkes Observatory. This star, now called Barnard’s Star, is a 9.5 magnitude star located in the constellation Ophiuchus. Its proper motion is so much larger than that of any other star that it is considered to be virtually a “runaway” star. Even so, the angular velocity is small enough that measurements must be made from photographs taken many years apart. The negatives of Barnard’s Star provided in this lab were taken in 1924 and 1951 respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0902.1781V2 [Astro-Ph.GA] 30 Mar 2009 Martinez-Delgado .Munn A
    SEGUE: A Spectroscopic Survey of 240,000 stars with g =14–20 Brian Yanny1, Constance Rockosi2, Heidi Jo Newberg3, Gillian R. Knapp4, Jennifer K. Adelman-McCarthy1, Bonnie Alcorn1, Sahar Allam1, Carlos Allende Prieto5,6, Deokkeun An7, Kurt S. J. Anderson8,9, Scott Anderson10, Coryn A.L. Bailer-Jones11, Steve Bastian1, Timothy C. Beers12, Eric Bell11, Vasily Belokurov13, Dmitry Bizyaev8, Norm Blythe8, John J. Bochanski10, William N. Boroski1, Jarle Brinchmann14, J. Brinkmann8, Howard Brewington8, Larry Carey10, Kyle M. Cudworth15, Michael Evans10, N. W. Evans13, Evalyn Gates15, B. T. G¨ansicke16, Bruce Gillespie8, Gerald Gilmore13, Ada Nebot Gomez-Moran17, Eva K. Grebel18, Jim Greenwell10, James E. Gunn4, Cathy Jordan8, Wendell Jordan8, Paul Harding19, Hugh Harris20, John S. Hendry1, Diana Holder8, Inese I. Ivans4, Zeljko Ivezi´c10, Sebastian Jester11, Jennifer A. Johnson7, Stephen M. Kent1, Scot Kleinman8, Alexei Kniazev11, Jurek Krzesinski8, Richard Kron15, Nikolay Kuropatkin1, Svetlana Lebedeva1, Young Sun Lee12, R. French Leger1, S´ebastien L´epine21, Steve Levine20, Huan Lin1, Daniel C. Long8, Craig Loomis4, Robert Lupton4, Olena Malanushenko8, Viktor Malanushenko8, Bruce Margon22, David Martinez-Delgado11, Peregrine McGehee23, Dave Monet20, Heather L. Morrison19, Jeffrey A. Munn20, Eric H. Neilsen, Jr.1, Atsuko Nitta8, John E. Norris24, Dan Oravetz8, Russell Owen10, Nikhil Padmanabhan25, Kaike Pan8, R. S. Peterson1, Jeffrey R. Pier20, Jared Platson1, Paola Re Fiorentin26,11, Gordon T. Richards27, Hans-Walter Rix11, David J. Schlegel25, Donald P. Schneider28, Matthias R. Schreiber29, Axel Schwope17, Valena Sibley1, Audrey Simmons8, Stephanie A. Snedden8, J. Allyn Smith30, Larry Stark10, Fritz Stauffer8, M. Steinmetz17, C. Stoughton1, Mark SubbaRao15,31, Alex Szalay32, Paula Szkody10, Aniruddha R. Thakar32, Sivarani Thirupathi12, Douglas Tucker1, Alan Uomoto33, Dan Vanden Berk28, Simon Vidrih18, Yogesh Wadadekar4,34, Shannon Watters8, Ron Wilhelm35, Rosemary F.
    [Show full text]
  • New Determinations of the Proper Motions of 44 Pulsars PA
    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 261,113-124 (1993) .113H New determinations of the proper motions of 44 pulsars 93MNRAS.261. 19 P. A. Harrison, A. G. Lyne and B. Anderson University of Manchester, Nuffield Radio Astronomy Laboratories, Jodrell Bank, Macclesfield, Cheshire SKI 1 9DL Accepted 1992 August 28. Received 1992 August 28; in original form 1992 May 22 ABSTRACT A programme of observations to measure the proper motions of 44 pulsars has been carried out at Jodrell Bank over a four-year period, yielding 31 determinations of proper motion and 13 upper limits. Observations were carried out with two interfero- meters of the MERLIN radio synthesis instrument at 408 MHz. By wide-field phase referencing to multiple sources within the primary beam of the instrument, accurate positions of each pulsar relative to its reference sources have been determined for a number of epochs. The change in the measured position with epoch results in the determination of the proper motion of the pulsar, using a method similar to that of Lyne, Anderson & Salter. The new measurements double the number of interfero- metrically measured proper motions and reinforce the general picture which emerged from that study, i.e. pulsars form a population of high-velocity objects (with rms speed - 300 km s~1 ) which seem to be migrating from the galactic plane. The new kinetic age determinations also support the conclusion that the magnetic fields of pulsars decay on time-scales of a few million years. The observation of a small number of pulsars moving towards the galactic plane, however, implies that there is a small population of pulsars born far from the plane, requiring some modification of the traditionally held views about pulsar birthplaces.
    [Show full text]
  • The Acceleration of the Solar System Barycenter Determined By
    M. H. Xu et al.: The Acceleration of the Solar System Barycenter Determined by Very Long Baseline Interferometry, IVS 2012 General Meeting Proceedings, p.352{356 http://ivscc.gsfc.nasa.gov/publications/gm2012/xu.pdf The Acceleration of the Solar System Barycenter Determined by Very Long Baseline Interferometry M. H. Xu, G. L. Wang, M. Zhao Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences Contact author: M. H. Xu, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract The secular aberration drift observed as the apparent proper motion of extragalactic radio sources is caused by the acceleration of the coordinate origin, the solar system barycenter. Therefore, the three-dimensional vector of the acceleration of the solar system barycenter was estimated as a global parameter by using the 30 years of global geodetic and astrometric VLBI data. This estimation is inde- pendent of any kinematic or dynamic model of the Milky Way or statistics hypothesis. The estimated acceleration in the direction of the Galactic center is 7.47 ± 0.46 mm·s−1·yr−1, while the estimation of the other two components are 0.17 ± 0.57 and 3.95 ± 0.47 mm·s−1·yr−1 in the direction along the Solar motion in the Galactic plane and in the direction normal to the Galactic plane, respectively. The estimate of the acceleration independently provides another kinematics parameter without referring to any objects within the Galaxy. 1. Introduction The definition, realization, and maintenance of a celestial reference system is one of the oldest and most fundamental tasks in astronomy. The previous celestial reference frame was constituted in the optical regime by the Fifth Fundamental Catalogue FK5 [1], which was a practical realization by mean positions and proper motions of a group of fundamental stars.
    [Show full text]