Reading Matthew 13 As a Prophetic Discourse: the Four Parables Presented in Private
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Page 1 of 7 Original Research Reading Matthew 13 as a prophetic discourse: The four parables presented in private Author: The task of Jesus’ disciples might be to juxtapose ‘new and old’ unconditional prophecies of the 1 Jacob J. Scholtz kingdom of heaven. After describing its setting, the four parables in Matthew 13, presented in Affiliation: private, are considered from a pre-millennial perspective. The parable of the hidden treasure 1Department of Old and New may indicate how Jesus Christ first authenticates and then hides his authority and power to Testament, Stellenbosch rule as King in terms of the Davidic Covenant over the literal Davidic kingdom – before he University, South Africa then goes to the cross. Having been to the cross, the parable of the pearl merchant may show Correspondence to: how the first, spiritual phase of the kingdom commences when Christ Jesus starts his pearl Jacob Scholtz ministry as High Priest in terms of the New Covenant. The parable of the dragnet has in view the transition from the spiritual phase of the kingdom into its future phase. An overview of Email: the four privately given parables of Matthew 13 is then provided. After this a summary of the [email protected] new and old prophecies contained in the eight parables of Matthew 13 is presented, followed Postal address: by the conclusion. 14 Botrivier Street, Protea Valley, Bellville 7530, South Africa ’n Ondersoek na Matteus 13 as ’n profetiese diskoers: Die vier gelykenisse wat privaat Dates: aangebied is. Die taak van Jesus se dissipels sou kon wees om ‘nuwe en ou’ onvoorwaardelike Received: 30 Sept. 2014 profesieë van die koninkryk van die hemele met mekaar te vergelyk. Nadat die konteks Accepted: 13 Feb. 2015 Published: 20 Apr. 2015 beskryf is, word die vier gelykenisse in Matteus 13 wat privaat aangebied is vanuit ’n pre- millenniale perspektief oorweeg. Die gelykenis van die verborge skat sou kon aantoon hoe How to cite this article: Jesus Christus sy gesag en mag om as Koning in terme van die Dawidiese Verbond oor die Scholtz, J.J., 2015, ‘Reading letterlike Dawidiese koninkryk te regeer, eers bevestig en dan verberg – waarna Hy kruis Matthew 13 as a prophetic discourse: The four parables toe gaan. Nadat Hy gekruisig is, sou die gelykenis van die pêrelkoper kon aantoon hoe die presented in private’, In die eerste, geestelike fase van die koninkryk ’n aanvang neem as Christus Jesus sy pêrelbediening Skriflig 49(1), Art. #1887, as Hoëpriester in terme van die Nuwe Verbond begin. Die gelykenis van die net toon die 7 pages. http://dx.doi. oorgang van die geestelike fase van die koninkryk van die hemele na die toekomstige letterlike org/10.4102/ids.v49i1.1887 fase. ’n Oorsig oor die vier gelykenisse van Matteus 13 wat privaat aangebied is, word dan Note: verskaf. Daarna word ’n opsomming van die nuwe en ou profesieë wat die agt gelykenisse This article is based on a van Matteus 13 bevat gegee, gevolg deur die slot. study at the Stellenbosch University (Discipline Group Old and New Testament, Faculty of Theology). Introduction 1 Copyright: With ‘this generation’s’ lack of response to Christ evident even in cities (Mt 11:20−24), the Lord © 2015. The Authors. of heaven and earth hides (ἔκρυψας) ‘these things’ − the mighty works of Christ − from the wise Licensee: AOSIS and learned, but reveals them to little children (11:25; cf. 11:2-6). Shortly thereafter, in Matthew’s OpenJournals. This work is presentation, this theme of concealing and revealing is continued when Jesus discloses − licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution indirectly through parables − things kept secret (κεκρυμμένα) since the foundation of the world License. (13:35; cf. 13:1−53a). As this parabolic discourse in Matthew is concluded, Jesus requires his disciples to understand ‘all these things’ about the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven and to bring forth what is ‘new and old’ (13:11, 51−52). As proposed in the first article about the parables of Matthew 13 (Scholtz 2015), this discourse can be read as a collective presentation (‘all these things’) of unconditional ‘new’ prophecies of the first, spiritual phase of the kingdom juxtaposed with unconditional ‘old’ prophecies regarding the establishment of the future, literal phase of the Davidic kingdom.2 After focusing on the contextual setting, a pre-millennial reading of the four privately given parables of Matthew 13 is presented. Then an overview of the four privately presented parables of Matthew 13 is provided. After this a summary of the new and old prophecies contained in the eight parables of Matthew 13 is given, followed by a conclusion.3 Read online: 1.Further references to the Gospel of Matthew will be indicated only by chapters and verses. Scan this QR code with your 2.This second article of a three-part series about Matthew 13 follows the same theological presuppositions and research focus as smart phone or detailed in the first article (Scholtz 2015). Familiarity with the first article is assumed in the presentation of this second article. mobile device 3.Understanding the prophecies contained in these parables may require the identification of specific, prophetic referents for the to read online. parables of Matthew 13. A person, process or event can be considered a specific, prophetic referent if it significantis to God’s kingdom and redemption purposes. http://www.indieskriflig.org.za doi:10.4102/ids.v49i1.1887 Page 2 of 7 Original Research The setting of Constable (2014:206; cf. Stallard 2000:3−7), this literary structure of Matthew 13 may be proposed: After the four parables spoken in public, the setting changes geographically as Jesus leaves the boat, sends the multitude A. Introduction (13:1-3a) away and goes into the house (13:1−33, 36). The audience B. First parable to all: The parable of the sower (13:3b-9) now comprises only those who have already left all to follow C. Q&A: Purpose (reveal & conceal) & explanation him. The temporal setting, however, remains the same, as (13:10-23) 4 four more parables are given on the same day (13:1, 36, 53a). D. Three parables to all: tares, mustard & leaven Regarding the narrative setting, the ‘story of Jesus is one of (13:24-33) conflict, so that its plot turns on conflict’ (Kingsbury 1992:347). E. Purpose (fulfilment) and Q&A: explanation Moreover, this key motif in Matthew is a conflict over (13:34-43) authority (Turner 2008:44). Whereas Matthew 11 sketches the D.’ Three parables to disciples: treasure, merchant national rejection of Jesus implicitly (cf. 11:20−24), Matthew & dragnet (13:44-48) 12 pictures an explicit rejection and consequent plot to destroy C.’ Explanation and Q&A: Purpose (understanding all) Jesus (12:14). For the first time in Matthew’s story, the conflict (13:49-51) between Jesus and the religious authorities has intensified B.’ Last parable to the disciples: The parable of the to the point where it has become ‘mortal’, a ‘struggle to the householder (13:52) death’ and ‘beyond reconciliation’ (Kingsbury 1992:351−352). A.’ Conclusion (13:53). After the Sabbath controversies, followed by a miracle (12:1- 23), the religious leaders of ‘this generation’ in Israel reject What is so important about Matthew 13:34−43? Firstly, God’s authority when they attribute ‘what is in fact the work the parable of the tares of the field may teach that the first, of God’s Spirit (v. 28) to his ultimate enemy, Satan’ (France spiritual or new phase of the kingdom of heaven can exist in 2007:482). According to Fruchtenbaum (1989:617), this terms of the New Covenant without the literal, future phase unpardonable sin is the ‘national rejection of the Messiahship of the kingdom of heaven having been established in terms of Jesus by Israel whilst he was physically present on the basis of the Davidic Covenant (Scholtz 2015). Thus, the kingdom that he was demon possessed. This sin is unpardonable, and of heaven exists-but-is-not-yet-established. Until the judgment was set.’ The narrative setting of Jesus’ parabolic Messianic kingdom is established, judgement of unbelieving teaching, therefore, comes at a point of crisis: ‘The kingdom ‘tares’ has been postponed and good and evil will co-exist parables, then, were not intended to define the kingdom in until Jesus’ Second Advent. This observation is consistent its offer but to explain the effects of its rejection’ (Beacham with Toussaint’s (1980) understanding of the purpose 1996:232). Luz (2001) argues for the following interpretation of Matthew’s Gospel, namely to explain God’s kingdom of the interruption of the narrative by the parable discourse: programme as it relates to Jesus, to Israel and to the Church: Our thesis is: It condenses and anticipates the story of the entire Gospel Matthew then presents the kingdom program in three aspects. of Matthew in a concentrated form. What will happen in the story First, the earthly literal kingdom was offered to Israel in the of Jesus as a whole is anticipated here and taught to disciples. In person of Jesus, the Messiah, at His first coming. Second, the this sense − and not for formal reasons − the parables discourse kingdom was postponed because Israel rejected its Messiah. is the center of the entire gospel. (p. 295) This postponed kingdom will be established at Christ’s second coming. Third, Christ Jesus is now engaged in building His Regarding the literary structure of Matthew 13, some church, composed of those who in this age are the heirs of the commentators (Nolland 2005:522) propose a triadic structure kingdom. (p. 20) of Matthew 13, but Hagner (2000:364) convincingly argues that no structural analysis can ignore the break at verse 36, A second reason why Matthew 13:34−43 may be exegetically despite the fact that ‘such a division separates the parable of significant is because of the ‘larger development in Matthew’s the weeds from its interpretation.