(Liliaceae) In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Liliaceae) In Acta Bot. Neerl. November 467-480. 32(5/6), 1983,p. Hybridization between Scilla non- scripta and S. hispanica (Liliaceae) in The Netherlands J.H. Ietswaart S.J.M. de Smet and J.P.M. Lubbers Vakgroep Biosystematiek, Biologisch Laboratorium,Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1087,1081 HV Amsterdam SUMMARY Six Scilla non-scripta/S. hispanica populationsin The Netherlands have been investigated with re- gard to their morphology, reproduction,chromosomes and ecology. All six belong tothe larger Dutch populations and are situated in the western part of The Nether- lands, in man-made woods (Alno-Padion vegetations) on former beach planes or beach walls. One population consists of S. non-scripta, another mainly of S. hispanica specimens. The other four are morphologically intermediate between the two taxa and hybrid swarms. Characters ofthe hy- brids range from S. hispanica to S. non-scripta, but in general habit they are often more like the latter taxon. Reproductionin the populationsis mainly by means of seeds. The chromosome number 16 found in all populations is 2n = (x =8), while only some minor differences in shape and size of the chromosomes have been noted between S. non-scripta and S. hispanica. Finally it will be concluded that the two taxa are conspecific, and they will be given a new status. Basionym, type and synonyms ofthe two taxa will be given. 1. INTRODUCTION Scilla non-scripta (Linnaeus) Hoffmannsegg et Link and S. hispanica Miller form, together with S. italica Linnaeus, a somewhat distinct group within the genus Scilla Linnaeus, characterized by coalescent bulbscales (as against free), and less coherent two (as against none or one) bract(s) more or (as against free) perianth segments. On this basis the Flora Europaea (Tutin et al. 1980) places these species in the genus Hyacinthoides Medikus. This is not followed by us because the differences regarding the morphological variation within Scilla as awhole are relatively unimportant (see also Heukels & Van der Meijden 1983). In addition to the taxa mentioned S. vincentina Hoffmannsegg et Link and S. reverchoniiDegen et Hervier also belong to the group, and they are both related be varieties of S. italica to or may even (Heywood 1980). reverchonii found in southern of the S. vincentina and S. are locally the part Iberian peninsula, while S. italica grows on both sides of the Franco-Italian border (Heywood 1980). S. hispanica as well as S. non-scripta are atlantic ele- ments in the European flora. The native distribution of S. hispanica is confined to the Iberianpeninsula and the opposing part ofNorth-Africa, whilst it is natur- alized in and France, England, Ireland, Italy Yugoslavia. S. non-scripta occurs 468 J. H. lETSWAART, S. J. M. DE SMET AND J. P, M. LUBBERS Table 1. Characters ofS. hispanica and,S. non-scripta from the literature. S. hispanica S. non-scripta Bulbs 2-4(-7) cm in diameter,purple-blue l-3(-5) cm in diameter, greyish out- outside (sometimes greenish) side (sometimes greenish) Leaves 4-8 20-50 20-50 per bulb, cm long, 3-6(-9) per bulb, cm long, 10-35(-40) mm wide 6-15(-25) mm wide Erect somewhat 50 Curved towards the 50 Scapes or curved, up to apex, up to cm long cm long Flowers 4- all around with per scape, arranged 4-16(-20) per scape, unilateral, the shape or slightly unilateral, with 3-10 mm long pedicels (in fruiting 5- 30 mm long pedicels (in fruiting stage up to mm); cylindrical-cam- to stage up 40 mm); campanulate, panulate,violet-blue (pink orwhite), blue (pinkor white), not scented scented Perianth segments Apex more or less bent outwards, c. Apex recurved. 2-4 mm wide, 15-20 12mm long mm long Stamens All equal, inserted at the middle of Unequal, the outer 3 inserted at the the perianth segments; anthers blue middle ofthe perianth segments, the inner 3 in the lower quarter; anthers cream-coloured Chromosome number 2n = 16 (24) 2n= 16(24) as native in the north-westernpart of the Iberian peninsula, where it is sympatric with S. hispanica. and it is further found in France, England, Ireland, Belgium and locally in The Netherlands and West-Germany. Moreoverit is naturalized in Italy and Romania (Dupont 1962; Heywood 1980; Meusel 1965; Roisin 1969; Schumacher-Waldbrol 1939). In table 1 the characters of S. and S. hispanica non-scripta are given as they are found in various publications, referring to natural populations as well as cultivated specimens (Blackman & Rutter 1954; Bonnier & Douin 1929; Boom & Ruys 1950; Claphamet al. 1962; Coutinho 1939; Fiori 1923; Garcke et al. 1972; Hegi 1939; heukels &Van der Meijden 1983; Heywood 1980; Van Ooststroom & Reichgelt 1964; Willkomm& Lange 1870). The aim of the present study is to investigate the morphology, chromosome number and shape, and the reproduction of S. hispanica and S. non-scripta in The Netherlands. The general taxonomic position of S. non-scripta and S. hispanica willbe also considered. 2. METHODS IN GENERAL These investigations were carried out in 1981. From twenty five Scilla popula- tions visited, six have been chosen for comprehensive study (approximate numbers of specimens are given between brackets): Sorghvliet, Den Haag 5 6 5 6 3 (10 -10 ); Zuidwijk, Wassenaar (10 -10 ); Duivenvoorde, Voorschoten(c. 10 ); 3 3 4 Vogelenzangse Bos, Vogelenzang (c. 10 ); Duinvliet, Overveen (10 -10 ); and 5 6 Wildrijk, Sint Maartenszee(10 -10 ). Within The Netherlands context all these six populations can be classified as large. The populations are all situated in SCILLA NON-SCRIPTA AND S. HISPANICA 469 and 0 fruits + 0 7) 3) 9) 6) 4) 4) + of 9-15) 3- 9-17) 1- (1-2) 3- 5-18) 8-14) 2- (2-3) 3- 3- 0 + Vogelenzang ( ( 1/2(3/10-6/10) 1/5(1/10-3/10) 13(11-17) I 17(10-24) 16(11-18) 20(13-26) 20(13-29) 1.5 2.5 3( 5( 2( 5( 4( 4( 12( 10( 0 100 characters 11 11 ± 0 For + 7) 5) 5) 5) 5) 5) 20 + 3- 9-17) (1-3) 8-27) 4-21) 6-13) given. 2- 4- 3- (1.5-4) 2- 3- 0 ( + 18(15-24) ( 16(11-21) 1/2(2/10-6/10) ( 1/4(1/10-3/10) ( 21(16-25) 5( 37(27^18) 40(28-59) 1.5 4( Wildrijk I 7 9( 4( 3 13( 10( 2 4 0 is 16 80 + value 0 + 6) 1) 6) 2 + 3-10) 7-23) 2- (1-3) 3-18) 5-42) 7-15) 2- (2^1.5) (3-6) (3-5) 0- maximum (29-58) 8 1(1-3) + ( ( 1/2)3/10-6/10) 1/4(2/10-4/10) Sorghvliet 25(13-31) 24(13-31) 31(19-42) 1.5 2.5 3.5 4,5 6( 19(10-37) 18(14-23) 4( 9( 4( 0( 15 45 16 11( 90 + and 2 5) + 8) 5) 6) 4) 6) minimum 0 5-3. + 3- 7-20) 2- (1-3) 3-14) 6-20) 6-14) 9-21) 3- 2- 4- (20-44) 0 ( 1/2(2/10-6/10) 1/4(1/10-4/10) ( + 22(16-26) 19(15-27) 37(25-50) 1.5 16(11-22) 2(1. Duinvliet 3( 3( 5( 1 6( 4( 13( 11( 10( 5 0 mean, 39 16 98 + a 0 + 9) 8) 5) character 7 + 3- 7-20) 2-12) 2-23) 4-32) 8-18) 3- (2-4) (2-5) 3- 0 21(12-33) 1(1-3) ( 1/2(3/10-6/10) 1/5(2/10-3/10) + 19(14-26) 18(10-25) 1 18(15-23) 2.5 3.5 27(13-38) 1 38(20-54) Zuidwijk 6( 4( 9( 4( 4( 13( 12( 0 + every 1 93 nearly 9) 7) 7) 4) 6) For 7-16) 8-30) 6-14) 80+10+0 (18-25). 3- 3- 4- 2- (3-5.5) 3- 1(1-2) ( 1(1-2) 1(0-1) + + _ Duivenvoorde 24(20-26) 28(20-39) 17(11-24) 40(26-51) ( 25(13-37) 18(15-21) 1/2(3/10-6/10) 1/6(2/10-3/10) ( 5( 5( 3( 5 10( 4 5 populations. 23 16 20( 10 + 45° blue) is flowers is 2 mm blue. Scilla mm part base) base) 1 also in mm in mm (outer six vertical, in cream, in mm (from (from equal) the flower tubiform perianth mm mm mm is is means flower in at at respectively of of m m (0 of . in (1 stem segments inner plant perianth .. plant lowest of white) per lowest segment inserted inserted mm cm inclined length of length length length length colour 4. mm cm mm mm of and (% per per unilateral) . position of in in in in in in pink, Characters table perianth etc.; less number length of colour scent of 2. see length width number length number length width apex length width or , blue, Measure recurving segments Filament Filament. Table seeds Bulb Bulb Leaf Leaf Leaf Stem Stem Stem Stem inclined more Flower Bract Pedicel perianth Width f stamina f stamina Anther Flower lightFlower 470 J. H. lETSWAART, S. J. M. DE SMET AND J. P. M. LUBBERS the coastal area of Zuid- and Noord-Holland, in parks and on estates on former beach beach walls All in humous planes or (Doing 1962/63). populations grow sand, five in woods and the population at Duivenvoorde in a grass vegetation surrounded by woods. The lattershould be considered to belong to the Arrhen- atherion elatioris and the other vegetations all to the Alno-Padion (according to Westhoff& Den Held 1975).
Recommended publications
  • Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE
    Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE LILIACEAE de Jussieu 1789 (Lily Family) (also see AGAVACEAE, ALLIACEAE, ALSTROEMERIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE, ASPARAGACEAE, COLCHICACEAE, HEMEROCALLIDACEAE, HOSTACEAE, HYACINTHACEAE, HYPOXIDACEAE, MELANTHIACEAE, NARTHECIACEAE, RUSCACEAE, SMILACACEAE, THEMIDACEAE, TOFIELDIACEAE) As here interpreted narrowly, the Liliaceae constitutes about 11 genera and 550 species, of the Northern Hemisphere. There has been much recent investigation and re-interpretation of evidence regarding the upper-level taxonomy of the Liliales, with strong suggestions that the broad Liliaceae recognized by Cronquist (1981) is artificial and polyphyletic. Cronquist (1993) himself concurs, at least to a degree: "we still await a comprehensive reorganization of the lilies into several families more comparable to other recognized families of angiosperms." Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) and Dahlgren, Clifford, & Yeo (1985) synthesized an early phase in the modern revolution of monocot taxonomy. Since then, additional research, especially molecular (Duvall et al. 1993, Chase et al. 1993, Bogler & Simpson 1995, and many others), has strongly validated the general lines (and many details) of Dahlgren's arrangement. The most recent synthesis (Kubitzki 1998a) is followed as the basis for familial and generic taxonomy of the lilies and their relatives (see summary below). References: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998, 2003); Tamura in Kubitzki (1998a). Our “liliaceous” genera (members of orders placed in the Lilianae) are therefore divided as shown below, largely following Kubitzki (1998a) and some more recent molecular analyses. ALISMATALES TOFIELDIACEAE: Pleea, Tofieldia. LILIALES ALSTROEMERIACEAE: Alstroemeria COLCHICACEAE: Colchicum, Uvularia. LILIACEAE: Clintonia, Erythronium, Lilium, Medeola, Prosartes, Streptopus, Tricyrtis, Tulipa. MELANTHIACEAE: Amianthium, Anticlea, Chamaelirium, Helonias, Melanthium, Schoenocaulon, Stenanthium, Veratrum, Toxicoscordion, Trillium, Xerophyllum, Zigadenus.
    [Show full text]
  • COST EFFECTIVE PRODUCTION of SPECIALTY CUT FLOWERS By
    COST EFFECTIVE PRODUCTION OF SPECIALTY CUT FLOWERS By TODD JASON CAVINS Bachelor of Science Southwestern Oklahoma State University Weatherford, Oklahoma 1997 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December, 1999 COST EFFECTIVE PRODUCTION OF SPECIALTY CUT FLOWERS Thesis Approved: ' 1 Thesis Advisor .. ;.; ,, ( Dean of the Graduate College 11 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The purpose of this study was to improve production methods of various specialty cut flower species. Improving production methods allows growers to reduce cost, improve plant quality and earn higher profits. This study involved three research areas of specialty cut flowers. Partial funding was provided by a S.A.R.E. grant and Bear Creek Farm, Stillwater, OK. I would like to thank my principle advisor Dr. John Dole for his encouragement, support, honesty and perseverance. I would like to thank Dr. Janet Cole and Dr. Jim Ownby for serving on my thesis committee. Dr. Cole offered valuable insight and direction towards the research. Dr. Ownby contributed with his wealth of knowledge in plant physiology. A special thanks goes to Vicki Stamback and the gang at Bear Creek Farm. Vicki's experience as a specialty cut flower grower allowed me to gain personal knowledge of the cut flower industry that would not have taken place without her. Vicki's efforts and cooperation greatly improved this study. I want to thank Randall Smith and Leah Aufill for their assistance and plant care. Tim Hooper also contributed by offering his experiences from the floriculture industry and providing stress relieving lunch breaks.
    [Show full text]
  • Ekonomik Önemi.Pdf
    INTRODUCTION OF ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT BULBOUS PLANTS COLLECTED FROM WILD FLORA IN SEMI ARID CLIMATIC CONDITIONS OF SOUTHEASTERN ANATOLIAN REGION OF TURKEY Süleyman KIZIL1, Khalid Mahmood KHAWAR2 and Neşet ARSLAN2 1 Department of Field Crops, Agriculture Faculty, Dicle University, 21280 Diyarbakir, Turkey 2 Department of Field Crops, Agriculture Faculty, Ankara University, 06100 Ankara, Turkey Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Turkey has rich biodiversity due to its topography comprising of plains, plateaus and mountainous regions that have contributed to enrichment of its flora including bulbous plants. Many among these have potential for use in pharmaceutical and ornamental plant industries. However, owing to lack of proper research many among these plants are yet to be evaluated for commercial propagation. Leaves, bulbs and flowers among many plant parts are being evaluated locally as salads, vegetables, products of pharmaceutical importance and flowers for use in cut flower and ornamental plant industries. The study aimed to find economically important plant geophytes that grow in the wild of the South Eastern Anatolian climatic zones. To meet the objective, a field survey of bulbous geophytes of South Eastern and Eastern Anatolia was carried out during April-July periods of 2011 and 2012 years. The survey results indicated distribution of bulb geophytes at altitudes of 640 to 2651m. The geophytes belonging to the genus Allium, Biarum, Bellevalia, Crocus, Eranthis, Fritillaria, Gladiolus, Hyacinthus, Iris, Ixillirion, Muscari, Narcissus, Ornithogalum, Sternbergia, Scilla, Tulipa, Ophyrs and Orchis were collected. After initial screening, it was decided to culture 40 species; the bulbs of these species were planted in the collection gardens of the Department of Field Crops, Dicle University, Diyarbakir for determination of several parameters including, flowering date, duration of flowering time and other agronomical characteristics important for bulbous species.
    [Show full text]
  • Jānis Rukšāns Late Summer/Autumn 2001 Bulb Nursery ROZULA, Cēsu Raj
    1 Jānis Rukšāns Late summer/autumn 2001 Bulb Nursery ROZULA, Cēsu raj. LV-4150 LATVIA /fax + 371 - 41-32260 + 371 - 9-418-440 All prices in US dollars for single bulb Dear friends! Again, we are coming to you with a new catalogue and again we are including many new varieties in it, probably not so many as we would like, but our stocks do not increase as fast as the demand for our bulbs. We hope for many more novelties in the next catalogue. Last season we had one more successful expedition – we found and collected 3 juno irises never before cultivated (we hope that they will be a good addition to our Iris collection) and many other nice plants, too. In garden we experienced a very difficult season. The spring came very early – in the first decade of April the temperature unexpectedly rose up to +270 C, everything came up, flowered and finished flowering in few days and then during one day the temperature fell as low as –80 C. A lot of foliage was killed by a returned frost. As a result the crop of bulbs was very poor. The weather till the end of June was very dry – no rain at all, only hot days followed by cold nights. But then it started to rain. There were days with the relative air humidity up to 98%. The drying of harvested bulbs was very difficult. I was forced to clean one of my living rooms in my house, to heat it and to place there the boxes with Allium and Tulipa bulbs to save them from Penicillium.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Quality Assessment Report
    FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN INDIANA: THE CONCEPT, USE, AND DEVELOPMENT OF COEFFICIENTS OF CONSERVATISM Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) the State tree of Indiana June 2004 Final Report for ARN A305-4-53 EPA Wetland Program Development Grant CD975586-01 Prepared by: Paul E. Rothrock, Ph.D. Taylor University Upland, IN 46989-1001 Introduction Since the early nineteenth century the Indiana landscape has undergone a massive transformation (Jackson 1997). In the pre-settlement period, Indiana was an almost unbroken blanket of forests, prairies, and wetlands. Much of the land was cleared, plowed, or drained for lumber, the raising of crops, and a range of urban and industrial activities. Indiana’s native biota is now restricted to relatively small and often isolated tracts across the State. This fragmentation and reduction of the State’s biological diversity has challenged Hoosiers to look carefully at how to monitor further changes within our remnant natural communities and how to effectively conserve and even restore many of these valuable places within our State. To meet this monitoring, conservation, and restoration challenge, one needs to develop a variety of appropriate analytical tools. Ideally these techniques should be simple to learn and apply, give consistent results between different observers, and be repeatable. Floristic Assessment, which includes metrics such as the Floristic Quality Index (FQI) and Mean C values, has gained wide acceptance among environmental scientists and decision-makers, land stewards, and restoration ecologists in Indiana’s neighboring states and regions: Illinois (Taft et al. 1997), Michigan (Herman et al. 1996), Missouri (Ladd 1996), and Wisconsin (Bernthal 2003) as well as northern Ohio (Andreas 1993) and southern Ontario (Oldham et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Scilla Hakkariensis, Sp. Nov. (Asparagaceae: Scilloideae): a New Species of Scilla L
    adansonia 2020 ● 42 ● 2 DIRECTEUR DE LA PUBLICATION : Bruno David Président du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle RÉDACTEUR EN CHEF / EDITOR-IN-CHIEF : Thierry Deroin RÉDACTEURS / EDITORS : Porter P. Lowry II ; Zachary S. Rogers ASSISTANTS DE RÉDACTION / ASSISTANT EDITORS : Emmanuel Côtez ([email protected]) MISE EN PAGE / PAGE LAYOUT : Emmanuel Côtez COMITÉ SCIENTIFIQUE / SCIENTIFIC BOARD : P. Baas (Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, Wageningen) F. Blasco (CNRS, Toulouse) M. W. Callmander (Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève) J. A. Doyle (University of California, Davis) P. K. Endress (Institute of Systematic Botany, Zürich) P. Feldmann (Cirad, Montpellier) L. Gautier (Conservatoire et Jardins botaniques de la Ville de Genève) F. Ghahremaninejad (Kharazmi University, Téhéran) K. Iwatsuki (Museum of Nature and Human Activities, Hyogo) K. Kubitzki (Institut für Allgemeine Botanik, Hamburg) J.-Y. Lesouef (Conservatoire botanique de Brest) P. Morat (Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris) J. Munzinger (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier) S. E. Rakotoarisoa (Millenium Seed Bank, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Madagascar Conservation Centre, Antananarivo) É. A. Rakotobe (Centre d’Applications des Recherches pharmaceutiques, Antananarivo) P. H. Raven (Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis) G. Tohmé (Conseil national de la Recherche scientifique Liban, Beyrouth) J. G. West (Australian National Herbarium, Canberra) J. R. Wood (Oxford) COUVERTURE / COVER : Made from the figures of the article. Adansonia est
    [Show full text]
  • Networks in a Large-Scale Phylogenetic Analysis: Reconstructing Evolutionary History of Asparagales (Lilianae) Based on Four Plastid Genes
    Networks in a Large-Scale Phylogenetic Analysis: Reconstructing Evolutionary History of Asparagales (Lilianae) Based on Four Plastid Genes Shichao Chen1., Dong-Kap Kim2., Mark W. Chase3, Joo-Hwan Kim4* 1 College of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China, 2 Division of Forest Resource Conservation, Korea National Arboretum, Pocheon, Gyeonggi- do, Korea, 3 Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom, 4 Department of Life Science, Gachon University, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea Abstract Phylogenetic analysis aims to produce a bifurcating tree, which disregards conflicting signals and displays only those that are present in a large proportion of the data. However, any character (or tree) conflict in a dataset allows the exploration of support for various evolutionary hypotheses. Although data-display network approaches exist, biologists cannot easily and routinely use them to compute rooted phylogenetic networks on real datasets containing hundreds of taxa. Here, we constructed an original neighbour-net for a large dataset of Asparagales to highlight the aspects of the resulting network that will be important for interpreting phylogeny. The analyses were largely conducted with new data collected for the same loci as in previous studies, but from different species accessions and greater sampling in many cases than in published analyses. The network tree summarised the majority data pattern in the characters of plastid sequences before tree building, which largely confirmed the currently recognised phylogenetic relationships. Most conflicting signals are at the base of each group along the Asparagales backbone, which helps us to establish the expectancy and advance our understanding of some difficult taxa relationships and their phylogeny.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2019 ---International Rock Gardener--- August 2019
    International Rock Gardener ISSN 2053-7557 Number 116 The Scottish Rock Garden Club August 2019 ---International Rock Gardener--- August 2019 Latvian bulb maven Jānis Rukšāns begins our offering this month with a description of a new species of Puschkinia from Turkey. Fritz Kummert from Austria clarifies the naming of a plant which has long been mis-identified and Iep and Gerrit Eijkelenboom from the Netherlands give us some inspiration for a trip to the Gargano peninsula in Italy in April where they found many orchids and other flowers in bloom. Cover photo: Viola heterophylla subsp. graeca – photo Gerrit Eijkelenboom. ---Some August flowers from around the world – photos from SRGC forum members--- Pomaderris obcordata ‘Mallee Princess’ - Australia - Fermi de Sousa. Sempervivum marmoreum subsp. erythraeum - Canada - CohanFulford. Frost on Eranthis hyemalis leaves - New Zealand - Lesley Cox. Gentiana asclepidea - Scotland - Roma Fiddes. www.srgc.net Charity registered in Scotland SC000942 ISSN 2053-7557 ---International Rock Gardener--- ---Plant Description--- Puschkinia kurdistanica (Asparagaceae) – a new species from the shores of Lake Van in Turkey Janis Rukšāns, Dr. biol. h.c. email: [email protected] Published in International Rock Gardener (IRG) 116, August 2019 , pages 3 – 18. Summary – Species of the genus Puschkinia discussed; a new species P. kurdistanica from near Lake Van, Kurdistan described and its differences from P. peshmenii characterized. New data given about the variability and the distribution area of P. peshmenii. Key words – New taxa, genus Puschkinia, Puschkinia bilgineri, Puschkinia kurdistanica, Puschkinia peshmenii, Puschkinia scilloides, Turkey, Iran. The genus Puschkinia was described in 1805 from the Caucasus Mountains. Earlier included within the Liliaceae family, this genus is now placed in the Asparagaceae, subfamily Scilloideae1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ornithogalum
    NATURALLY SPECIAL Naturalising flower bulbs and specialities for public green spaces! CONTENT Naturally Special! Naturalising bulbs is a specialism within the huge range of spring- flowering bulbs. Naturalising means that a flower bulb can not only sustain itself in the right place, but it can also propagate. There are increasingly more of these bulbs. From our own tests and from countless conversations with people in towns, parks and botanical gardens, we have at last drawn up a list of ‘naturalisers’. In combination with plenty of information about the best location, you can create sustainable planting with this selection. With the dramatic decline in the number of insects due to declining biodiversity, attention is fortunately being paid again to plants as providers of nectar and pollen. Our selection of naturalising bulbs can make a good contribution to this issue in early spring. I have a great passion for new ranges from our fellow breeders, and I had to include some of their lovely specialties in this catalogue. Special but readily available for our large customer base! Enjoy this catalogue full of naturalising bulbs & specialties for public green areas! Tijmen Verver 02 Content 02 The Naturals Eranthis 52 Autumn blooms Erythronium 54 Special Collection 04 Colchicum 26 Fritillaria 56 Allium 05 Crocus 28 Galanthus 58 Galanthus 08 Cyclamen 30 Hyacinthoides 60 Sternbergia 32 Ipheion 62 Inspiration 10 Leucojum 64 The Naturals Lilium 70 The Naturals Spring blooms Muscari 72 Technical Info 12 Allium 34 Narcissus 74 Climate Zones 18 Anemone 36 Nectaroscordum 78 Plant Methods 66 Arum 38 Ornithogalum 80 Bellevalia 40 Puschkinia 82 Mixtures 20 Chionodoxa 42 Scilla 84 Convallaria 44 Tulipa 86 Reportage Corydalis 46 Zantedeschia 90 Bee Wise 24 Crocus 48 Hein Meeuwissen 89 Cyclamen 50 Index 92 Pictographs 95 03 COLLECTION SPECIAL SPECIAL COLLECTION Special Collection New! Tijmen Ververver has selected several special ornamental onions and snowdrops for the real enthusiasts.
    [Show full text]
  • Flowering Bulbs for Tennessee Gardens
    Agricultural Extension Service The University of Tennessee PB 1610 Flowering Bulbs for Tennessee Gardens 1 Contents Bulbs ........................................3 Corms .......................................3 Tubers .......................................3 Rhizomes .....................................4 Culture ......................................4 Introduction ................................4 Site Selection ................................5 Site Preparation ..............................5 Selecting Plant Material ........................5 Planting Spring-Flowering Geophytes ................6 Iris .......................................6 Planting Summer-Flowering Geophytes ..............7 Caladium ..................................7 Canna .....................................8 Dahlia .....................................8 Gladiolus ..................................9 Maintenance of Geophytes ....................... 10 Forcing Spring-Flowering Geophytes in the Home ... 11 Forcing Tender Geophytes in the Home ........... 12 Amaryllis ................................. 12 Dictionary of Bulbous Plants ...................... 13 The Bulb Selector .............................. 21 Mail Order Sources ............................ 22 U.S.D.A. Hardiness Zone Map .................... 23 2 Flowering Bulbs for Tennessee Gardens Mary Lewnes Albrecht, Professor and Head Ornamental Horticulture and Landscape Design wealth of spring-, are thick, fleshy, modified corm does not summer- and fall- leaves, the scales. The scales persist from A flowering
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Invaders of Mid-Atlantic Natural Areas Revised & Updated – with More Species and Expanded Control Guidance
    Plant Invaders of Mid-Atlantic Natural Areas Revised & Updated – with More Species and Expanded Control Guidance National Park Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1 I N C H E S 2 Plant Invaders of Mid-Atlantic Natural Areas, 4th ed. Authors Jil Swearingen National Park Service National Capital Region Center for Urban Ecology 4598 MacArthur Blvd., N.W. Washington, DC 20007 Britt Slattery, Kathryn Reshetiloff and Susan Zwicker U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Chesapeake Bay Field Office 177 Admiral Cochrane Dr. Annapolis, MD 21401 Citation Swearingen, J., B. Slattery, K. Reshetiloff, and S. Zwicker. 2010. Plant Invaders of Mid-Atlantic Natural Areas, 4th ed. National Park Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, DC. 168pp. 1st edition, 2002 2nd edition, 2004 3rd edition, 2006 4th edition, 2010 1 Acknowledgements Graphic Design and Layout Olivia Kwong, Plant Conservation Alliance & Center for Plant Conservation, Washington, DC Laurie Hewitt, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office, Annapolis, MD Acknowledgements Funding provided by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation with matching contributions by: Chesapeake Bay Foundation Chesapeake Bay Trust City of Bowie, Maryland Maryland Department of Natural Resources Mid-Atlantic Invasive Plant Council National Capital Area Garden Clubs Plant Conservation Alliance The Nature Conservancy, Maryland–DC Chapter Worcester County, Maryland, Department of Comprehensive Planning Additional Fact Sheet Contributors Laurie Anne Albrecht (jetbead) Peter Bergstrom (European
    [Show full text]
  • Hyacinthaceae
    RHSRHS PlantPlant TrialsTrials andand AwardsAwards Hyacinthaceae – little blue bulbs Melanie Dashwood Botanical Recorder, RHS Garden Wisley Brian Mathew Bulb specialist formerly botanist at Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew Bulletin Number 11 September 2005 www.rhs.org.uk RHS Trial of Hyacinthaceae – little blue bulbs Compared to the more ‘traditional’ spring- flowering bulbs, such as daffodils, crocuses The following is a guide to the most commonly cultivated genera of smaller, and snowdrops, the smaller, frost-hardy, hardy Hyacinthaceae: blue-flowered members of the Hyacinthaceae family are perhaps much 1 2 3 less familiar as garden plants. With the exception of a few of the grape hyacinths (Muscari) and squills (Scilla) most of the species in this group are uncommon in gardens, and yet when grown under the right conditions some can be of considerable garden value and interest. Amongst the many specialists on the WW WW WW Rock Garden Plant Trials Sub-committee, 4 5 6 the RHS is fortunate to have the bulb experts Brian Mathew and Chris Brickell, who enthusiastically supported the idea to conduct a trial of the smaller, hardy Hyacinthaceae. In addition to the desire to raise the profile of this interesting group of ‘little blue bulbs’, they considered that a comparative trial might shed light on some of the problems associated with the BM BM identification and naming of certain 7 8 9 species and forms of hardy Hyacinthaceae. The family Hyacinthaceae In the 1980s a botanical review of the large family Liliaceae resulted in the proposal that it should be split up into many smaller families, one of which was BM WW MS Hyacinthaceae.
    [Show full text]