Energy Infrastructure Primer: a Guide for Both New and Experienced Investors

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Energy Infrastructure Primer: a Guide for Both New and Experienced Investors Energy Infrastructure Primer: A guide for both new and experienced investors Version 1.1 April 2020 Alerian 3625 N. Hall St., Suite 1200 Dallas, TX 75219 alerian.com Table of Contents Introduction 3 Energy Infrastructure 101 4 Energy Infrastructure 201 9 Energy Infrastructure Investing 15 Classification Standard 21 Glossary 23 Disclaimers 27 2 // Introduction An investment in energy infrastructure is an investment in EI 101 is designed for those who are starting from the North America’s continued production and consumption of beginning or those who would like a refresher on the transportable energy over the next several decades. Energy basics of energy infrastructure. We’ve also detailed energy infrastructure companies own the pipelines, storage infrastructure business models, as well as the fundamental tanks, and processing facilities that bring energy from the backdrop supporting opportunities in this space. wellhead to America’s doorstep and increasingly to coasts for exports. In the energy industry, these activities describe EI 201 goes into further detail on energy infrastructure “midstream”, which is the bridge between production business models and gets to the importance of shale (upstream) and consumption (downstream). While still in growing US energy production. This section is for related to the energy industry, most energy infrastructure those investors wanting to have a firm grasp on energy business lines do not have direct exposure to commodity infrastructure economics before investing. We explain price fluctuations. Their businesses function primarily on the nuances of various midstream business models, a set fee per volume or fee for service basis. In short, the the regulations around pipelines and pipeline tariffs, business model is driven by volumes. and the valuation metrics typically used for the energy infrastructure space. The prices (or tariffs) that energy infrastructure companies can charge are determined either by negotiated contracts Energy Infrastructure Investing is designed for those who or are federally regulated. Typically, tariffs increase have decided to invest. This section walks through each each year by a measure linked to inflation. In terms of energy infrastructure access product, explaining the pros volumes, the significant growth in North American oil and cons as well as exploring which goals might be met and gas production has increased the need for energy by each. This section includes considerations for selecting infrastructure assets. While energy demand in North individual securities and investing in products, whether America remains fairly steady, global demand growth active or passive. continues, particularly for emerging markets, creating opportunities for energy infrastructure companies. Increasingly, these companies are processing, transporting, and storing hydrocarbons that will ultimately be sent to locations worldwide. 3 Energy Infrastructure 101 4 // Energy Infrastructure 101 The Very Basics volume side, growing production of North American oil and natural gas has necessitated more energy infrastructure Energy infrastructure companies are involved in the such as pipelines, storage tanks, and processing plants. transportation, processing, and storage of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids (NGLs). Historically, a majority of How Investors Make Money with Energy the midstream space has been structured as master limited Infrastructure partnerships, or MLPs (we won’t cover MLPs extensively in Energy Infrastructure 101, but those looking for more If you own a stock, there are two ways to make money. The information can find it in our MLP Primer). However, price of the stock increases and you can sell it for more than C-Corporations have become more prominent in midstream you bought it. Formally, this is known as price appreciation. in recent years. The stock also likely pays you dividends. The amount of dividends relative to the share price is known as yield. The Basic EI Business Models1 The historical average yield of energy infrastructure 1. Transportation over the past 5 years has been nearly 6.0%, which means Just like it sounds, transportation involves moving energy that if you invested $100, on average, you would be paid commodities like oil and natural gas from one place to another. $6.00 each year. The chart below shows yields for energy In North America, most energy travels through a pipeline, but infrastructure, represented by the Alerian Midstream it can also move via truck, railcar, or ship. Pipelines are the Energy Index (AMNA), compared to other asset classes. cornerstone of the energy infrastructure space. Energy infrastructure boasts a higher yield than utilities and real estate investment trusts (REITs), which are asset 2. Processing classes known for their income potential. Processing encompasses any business that transforms a raw commodity into a usable form. It involves removing MLP Historical Average Yield (5 Years) impurities like water and dirt from wellhead natural gas . and separating the natural gas stream into pipeline-quality natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGLs), which are used as heating fuels and petrochemical feedstocks. 3. Storage Storage includes tanks, wells, and other facilities both above and below ground. These assets provide flexibility to the energy economy, so there is propane available for winter heating, gasoline for summer driving, and jet fuel for the holidays. How Energy Infrastructure Companies Make . Money Energy infrastructure companies typically operate fee- based business models. EI companies earn a set fee for each barrel of oil or million British Thermal Unit (MMBtu) of . natural gas transported, stored, or processed (in the case of natural gas) regardless of the price of the hydrocarbon. This is because these companies typically do not own the oil or gas. EI companies generally sign long-term contracts (5 to 20 years in length) with their customers, which makes for stable cash flows. Accordingly, the revenue equation for most business activities is fairly simple: price multiplied AMNA REITs Utilities Bonds S&P by volume. As such, more volumes means more cash flows. Source: Alerian, Bloomberg as of December 31, 2019 On the price side, a federal agency sets the fee charged by interstate liquids pipelines, and the fee increases with inflation. Pipeline fees can also be negotiated with a customer based on the cost of operating the pipeline and market rates for liquids or natural gas pipelines. On the 1 Please see EI 201 for an in-depth look at all energy infrastructure business functions. 5 // Energy Infrastructure 101 The Pipeline Business, Explained applying these technologies, oil producers began implementing the same drilling technology, seeing strong production growth The modern pipeline network2 in the United States has from oil wells. its roots in the outbreak of World War II. Before the war, the East Coast was the largest consumer of energy in In 2009, the US became the world’s largest producer of natural the country. Refined products (such as gasoline, diesel, gas. By 2012, the US had an abundance of natural gas, leading and jet fuel) were delivered from Gulf Coast refineries to lower prices, but gas production continued to grow. In 2014, via tankers. Tankers also carried raw crude oil from the rapid growth in US oil production had led to a global crude Middle East. However, once the US became involved in oversupply and weakness in oil prices. A multi-decade ban on the war, German submarines began sinking these tankers. US crude exports was lifted by Congress in December 2015. Oil Together, the government and the petroleum industry built prices gradually recovered from their relative bottoming in pipelines that could cover long distances and transport February 2016, and US oil production continued to increase. large amounts of oil. This network subsequently fueled the In 2018, the US became the world’s largest oil producer and is economic boom that followed the war., and many of those now exporting millions of barrels of crude each day. Global oil original pipelines are still in service today. prices fell significantly in early 2020 due in part to the demand impacts stemming from the coronavirus. Price weakness may There are both large diameter trunklines that function lead to a temporary reduction in US oil production, though the like interstates (instead of being four lanes wide, they are long-term view for production growth remains intact. often 42” in diameter, or large enough for a child to stand inside), as well as smaller delivery lines which connect the The term “energy renaissance” refers to the overwhelming large pipelines to each town. Product traveling through growth in US energy production that has occurred over trunklines is fungible—the customer will receive product the last decade, culminating in projections that the US will on the other end that is the same quality as that which become a net energy exporter by 2020. was sent, but they won’t be the exact same molecules. It is as if someone sent $100 to a college student through a Long-Term Growth Expected for US Energy Production bank. That student will not get the exact same $100 bill as his or her benefactor sent, but the student doesn’t care because $100 is $100. Money is fungible. However, smaller delivery lines operate on a batch system, where the exact same molecules are delivered as were shipped. In this case, our lucky college student gets a couple dozen cookies, and the ones delivered are the exact same cookies his or her parents baked, not cookies that some other people made. Energy Renaissance Prior to the 2000s, much of the energy industry was focused on peak oil and the ways companies and our society would have to shift in response. While producers knew that oil reserves existed, accessing the oil in a cost-effective way was still difficult. Experts forecasted that expensive and complex recovery methods would be needed to continue to produce even a modest number of barrels. In the early 2000s, the natural gas industry in the US began widespread application of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing.
Recommended publications
  • Woodford Shale Enclosed Min-Basin Fill on the Hunton Paleo Shelf
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE WOODFORD SHALE ENCLOSED MINI-BASIN FILL ON THE HUNTON PALEO SHELF. A DEPOSITIONAL MODEL FOR UNCONVENTIONAL RESOURCE SHALES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By EMILIO J. TORRES-PARADA Norman, Oklahoma 2020 WOODFORD SHALE ENCLOSED MINI-BASIN FILL ON THE HUNTON PALEO SHELF. A DEPOSITIONAL MODEL FOR UNCONVENTIONAL RESOURCE SHALES A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA SCHOOL OF GEOSCIENCES BY THE COMMITTEE CONSISTING OF Dr. Kurt J. Marfurt, Chair Dr. Roger M. Slatt, Co-chair Dr. Deepak Devegowda Dr. Michael Engel Dr. R. Paul Philp © Copyright by EMILIO TORRES-PARADA 2020. All Rights Reserved. To Heydi, Simón, Antonia, Lorenzo and all my family With them on my side, everything is possible! In memoriam of Jose M. Torres-Mantilla (1954-2012), my beloved Dad In memoriam of Dr. Roger Slatt. It’s been an awesome ride! “at any rate!...” “Con Dios todo y sin el nada” iv Acknowledgments I want to express my highest gratitude to many different people who supported and encouraged me to pursue my goals and dreams. I have really enjoyed my years as a sooner. I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Dr. Roger M. Slatt, who very generously accepted to be my advisor. I am very grateful for his guidance, mentoring, friendship and support throughout many years. He has always believed in me and been a constant support to all my research projects. He has kindly advised and helped my family and myself for coming to OU during the past ten years and also nicely accepted to be leading my faculty committee and supported “Emilio’s ideas.” He is more than a friend and mentor.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY of the ROANOKE and STEWARTSVILLE QUADRANGLES, VIRGINIA by Mervin J
    VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES PUBLICATION 34 GEOLOGY OF THE ROANOKE AND STEWARTSVI LLE OUADRANG LES, VI RG I N IA Mervin J. Bartholomew COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Robert C. Milici, Commissioner of Mineral Resources and State Geologist CHARLOTTESVI LLE, VIRGI NIA 1 981 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES PUBLICATION 34 GEOLOGY OF THE ROANOKE AND STEWARTSVI LLE OUADRANG LES, VI RG I N IA Mervin J. Bartholomew COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Robert C. Milici, Commissioner of Mineral Resources and State Geologist CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 1 981 FRONT COVER: Fold showing slightly fanned, axial plane, slaty cleav- age in a loose block of Liberty Hall mudstone at Reference Locality 20, Deer Creek, Roanoke quadrangle. REFERENCE: Portions of this publication may be quoted if credit is given to the Virginia Division of Mineral Resources. It is recommended that referenee to this report be made in the following form: Bartholomew, M. J., 1981, Geology of the Roanoke and Stewaitsville quadrangles, Vir- ginia, Vlrginia Division of Mineral Resources Publicatio4 34,23 p. VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES PUBLICATION 34 GEOLOGY OF THE ROANOKE AND STEWARTSVI LLE OUADRANG LES, VIRG I N IA Mervin J. Bartholomew COM MONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Robert C. Milici, Commissioner of Mineral Resources and State Geologist CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRG INIA 1 981 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Richmond, Virginia FRED W. WALKER, Director JERALD F. MOORE, Deputy Director BOARD ARTHUR P. FLIPPO, Doswell, Chairman HENRY T.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy, Structure, and Tectonics: an East-To-West Transect of the Blue Ridge and Valley and Ridge Provinces of Northern Virginia and West Virginia
    FLD016-05 2nd pgs page 103 The Geological Society of America Field Guide 16 2010 Stratigraphy, structure, and tectonics: An east-to-west transect of the Blue Ridge and Valley and Ridge provinces of northern Virginia and West Virginia Lynn S. Fichter Steven J. Whitmeyer Department of Geology and Environmental Science, James Madison University, 800 S. Main Street, Harrisonburg, Virginia 22807, USA Christopher M. Bailey Department of Geology, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA William Burton U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 22092, USA ABSTRACT This fi eld guide covers a two-day east-to-west transect of the Blue Ridge and Valley and Ridge provinces of northwestern Virginia and eastern West Virginia, in the context of an integrated approach to teaching stratigraphy, structural analysis, and regional tectonics. Holistic, systems-based approaches to these topics incorpo- rate both deductive (stratigraphic, structural, and tectonic theoretical models) and inductive (fi eld observations and data collection) perspectives. Discussions of these pedagogic approaches are integral to this fi eld trip. Day 1 of the fi eld trip focuses on Mesoproterozoic granitoid basement (associated with the Grenville orogeny) and overlying Neoproterozoic to Early Cambrian cover rocks (Iapetan rifting) of the greater Blue Ridge province. These units collectively form a basement-cored anticlinorium that was thrust over Paleozoic strata of the Val- ley and Ridge province during Alleghanian contractional tectonics. Day 2 traverses a foreland thrust belt that consists of Cambrian to Ordovician carbonates (Iapetan divergent continental margin), Middle to Upper Ordovician immature clastics (asso- ciated with the Taconic orogeny), Silurian to Lower Devonian quartz arenites and car- bonates (inter-orogenic tectonic calm), and Upper Devonian to Lower Mississippian clastic rocks (associated with the Acadian orogeny).
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Martinsburg Ordovician Stratigraphy of Virginia and West Virginia
    VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES PUBLICATION 57 POST-MARTINSBURG ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY OF VIRGINIA AND WEST VIRGINIA Richard J. Diecchio COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINERALS AND ENERGY DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES R<>bert C. Milici, Commissioner of Mineral Resources and State Geologist CHARLOTTESVI LLE, VIRG IN IA 1 985 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES PUBLICATION 57 POST-MARTINSBURG ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY OF VIRGINIA AND WEST VIRGINIA Richard J. Diecchio COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINERALS AND ENERGY DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Robert C. Milici, Commissioner of Mineral Resources and State Geologist CHARLOTTESVI LLE, VI RGI N IA 1 985 FRONT COVER: Two cycles within the Juniata Formation, Cumberland, Maryland. Jacob's staff is 5 feet long, graduated in feet. Bottom of staff marks base of lowermost sandstone bed (base of cycle). Basal sandstone is here channeled into the underlying mudstone. Top of Jacob's staff marks the middle Sholithos- bearing portion of cycle. Mudstone overlies the Skoli,thos facies and continues up to base of overlying sandstone bed, marking the base of the next cycle. VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES PUBLICATION 57 POST-MARTINSBURG ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY OF VIRGINIA AND WEST VIRGINIA Richard J. Diecchio COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINERALS AND ENERGY DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Robert C. Milici, Commissioner of Mineral Resources and State Geologist CHARLOTTESVI LLE, VI RGI N IA 1985 DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINERALS AND ENERGY Richmond, Virginia O. GENE DISHNER, Director COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF PURCHASE AND SUPPLY RICHMOND 1985 Publication available from Virginia Division of Mineral Resources, Box 366?, Charlottesville, VA 22g0g.
    [Show full text]
  • Petroscout | PLS
    November 2, 2016 PETRO SCOUT www.plsx.com E&P Serving the US upstream industry with information, analysis & prospects for sale Volume 27, No. 16 Oasis raises EURs for Wild Basin Bakken/Three Forks RSP drills best Wolfcamp A, Oasis Petroleum raised its EURs for both the Bakken and Three Forks at its expands into Delaware Wild Basin operating area in McKenzie County, North Dakota. A new, higher- RSP Permian completed its best intensity completion design has driven up well performance in the company’s Wolfcamp A well to date during Q3. The highest-performing area. Bakken wells now have a type curve of Kemmer 4217 WA is also the company’s 1.55 MMboe, up from 1.2 MMboe, and Three Forks wells are now westernmost Wolfcamp A expected to recover 1.2 MMboe each, up producer, indicating a potential from 1.0 MMboe. Bakken EUR raised to 1.55 MMboe, Three Forks to 1.2 MMboe. increase to RSP’s inventory The upward revisions are based on in that interval on the outskirts of its a slickwater completion design using 4 million lb of sand. Data that led to the type acreage. The well delivered a 30-day curve changes at Wild Basin included 30-day IPs of 1,912 boe/d for the Bakken and IP of 254 boe/d per 1,000 ft of lateral 1,490 boe/d for the Three Forks. Comparatively, the company’s IP-30s for its core area, which extends beyond Wild Basin, were 1,305 boe/d for the Bakken and 1,085 Kemmer well yields 254 boe/d per 1,000 ft with ~5,000-ft lateral.
    [Show full text]
  • PROOF Nelson GB DRAFT 10-13-11 NOON
    NYSGA 2011 Trip A-1 NYSGA 2011 Trip A-1 Trip A-1 Trip A-1 EFFECTS OF ADIRONDACK BASEMENT UPLIFT ON JOINTS AND FAULT DEVELOPMENT IN EFFECTS OF ADIRONDACK BASEMENT UPLIFT ON JOINTS AND FAULT DEVELOPMENT IN THE APPALACHIAN BASIN MARGIN, NEW YORK THE APPALACHIAN BASIN MARGIN, NEW YORK 1JOSHUA D. VALENTINO, 2DAVID W. VALENTINO, 2ALEX P. O’HARA, 2HANNAH VALENTINO 1JOSHUA D. VALENTINO, 2DAVID W. VALENTINO, 2ALEX P. O’HARA, 2HANNAH VALENTINO 1Department of Geosciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1Department of Geosciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061 Blacksburg, VA 24061 2Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, State University of New York at Oswego, 2Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, State University of New York at Oswego, Oswego, NY 13126 Oswego, NY 13126 Introduction Introduction Recent development of unconventional shale gas plays in the Appalachian Basin has drawn considerable Recent development of unconventional shale gas plays in the Appalachian Basin has drawn considerable attention to basement structures, and joints and fracture zones in the Paleozoic cover rocks (Figure 1), and attention to basement structures, and joints and fracture zones in the Paleozoic cover rocks (Figure 1), and nowhere is this more apparent than in the region of central Pennsylvania through western and central New nowhere is this more apparent than in the region of central Pennsylvania through western and central New York State (Engelder and Lash, 2009; Engelder, 2008; Jacobi, 2002; Jacobi and Fountain, 1996). Two York State (Engelder and Lash, 2009; Engelder, 2008; Jacobi, 2002; Jacobi and Fountain, 1996). Two ubiquitous joint sets occur throughout this region (J1 and J2 of Engelder), in addition to significant ubiquitous joint sets occur throughout this region (J1 and J2 of Engelder), in addition to significant domains of fracture intensification related to faults (Jacobi, 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Early Silurian Terrestrial Biotas of Virginia, Ohio, and Pennsylvania: an Investigation Into the Early Colonization of Land (284 Pp.)
    LATE ORDOVICIAN – EARLY SILURIAN TERRESTRIAL BIOTAS OF VIRGINIA, OHIO, AND PENNSYLVANIA: AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE EARLY COLONIZATION OF LAND A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Alexandru Mihail Florian Tomescu November 2004 © 2004 Alexandru Mihail Florian Tomescu All Rights Reserved This dissertation entitled LATE ORDOVICIAN – EARLY SILURIAN TERRESTRIAL BIOTAS OF VIRGINIA, OHIO, AND PENNSYLVANIA: AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE EARLY COLONIZATION OF LAND BY ALEXANDRU MIHAIL FLORIAN TOMESCU has been approved for the Department of Biological Sciences and the College of Arts and Sciences by Gar W. Rothwell Distinguished Professor of Environmental and Plant Biology Leslie A. Flemming Dean, College of Arts and Sciences TOMESCU, ALEXANDRU MIHAIL FLORIAN. Ph.D. November 2004. Biological Sciences Late Ordovician – Early Silurian terrestrial biotas of Virginia, Ohio, and Pennsylvania: an investigation into the early colonization of land (284 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Gar W. Rothwell An early phase in the colonization of land is documented by investigation of three fossil compression biotas from Passage Creek (Silurian, Llandoverian, Virginia), Kiser Lake (Silurian, Llandoverian, Ohio), and Conococheague Mountain (Ordovician, Ashgillian, Pennsylvania). A framework for investigation of the colonization of land is constructed by (1) a review of hypotheses on the origin of land plants; (2) a summary of the fossil record of terrestrial biotas; (3) an assessment of the potential of different continental depositional environments to preserve plant remains; (4) a reevaluation of Ordovician-Silurian fluvial styles based on published data; and (5) a review of pertinent data on biological soil crusts, which are considered the closest modern analogues of early terrestrial communities.
    [Show full text]
  • NYSGA-1978-A6-Paleoenvironments-Of-The-Potsdam-Sandstone-And-Theresa-Formation-Of
    Paleoenvironments of the Potsdam Sandstone and Theresa Formation of the Southwestern St. Lawrence Lowlands Bruce W. Selleck Colgate University, Hamilton, New York INTRODUCTION In northwestern New York State the Upper Cambrian-Lower Ordovician Potsdam Sandstone and Theresa Formation exhibit a variety of primary struc­ tures and compositional and textural variations indicative _o f deposition in nearshore, usuall y tide-dominated, settings. The purpose of thi s paper is to provide a descriptive overview of these units~ plus an interpretation of the depos itional environments of the various lithofacies. In the study area (Fig. 1) the Potsdam and Theresa are best exposed in the Frontenac Axis region . In this area the Paleozoi c rocks 1 ie in pro­ found unconformity upon a paleoerosional surface underlain by metamorphic rocks of Protoerozoic age. .,, I I , " I .., "I Figure 1. General ized geologic map of study area. 173 PREVIOUS STUDIES Since the Potsdam Sandstone was first described by Emmons (IB3B), the environment of its deposition has been a topic of discussion. Debate has arisen. no doubt, because the Potsdam, as pointed out by Fisher (1968), is a unit highly variable in both thickness and lithology throughout the area of its exposure . At the type section of the Potsdam, near Hannawa Falls, New York, Chadwick (1920) was convinced that the unit was depOSited in an aeolian setting on the basis of the magnitude of crossbeds, the high varia­ bility of crossbed-dip directions and the absence of fossils. Lewis (1970) argued for a marine origin for much of the Potsdam, based on the presence of marine fossils and dolomite in the upper portions of the formation and the lack of crossbed-dip an9les exceeding 30°.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Mineral Resources of Frederick County
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF FREDERICK COUNTY Charles Butts and Raymond S. Edmundson BULLETIN 80 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES James L. Calver Commissioner ol Mineral Resources and State Geologisl CHARLOTTESVI LLE, VI RGINIA | 966 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF FREDERICK COUNTY Charles Butts and "'"Raymond S. Edmundson BULLETIN 80 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES James L. Calver Commissioner of Mineral Resources and State Geologist CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA I 966 Couuorwnlr-trr or VnctNrl Dnp,llruBxt oF PuRctrAsEs eto Suppr-v Rrcrrruorqo 1966 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Richmond, Virginia MenvrN M. Surrronr,ltNo, Director A. S. Recrrat, J*., Executiue Assistant BOARD Canr,rsr,e H. HunrBr,srNe, Williamsburg, Chairman ANonnw A. Fenr,ov, Danville, Vice-Chairman Joe P. Gn Ls, Roanoke Ar,r,eN M. HBvwenp, Newport News Cr,euor A. Ju,ssue, Jn., Charlottesville Genraxo E. Moss, Chase City Ennu,sr L. Surrrr, Grundy JorrN S. TrronxroN, Culpeper Ancrrrr L. WENnrcH, Hopewell CONTENTS Pecr Abstract 1 qrannage . 5 5 6 9 .'..'....',....'..',.',......''..'.'..'...'.'..'....,....-'.....'..'.......'.....'.'.....'..'.''..'.-.'.',.. l ? 12 o1 2r 24 26 28 Lincolnshire formation ,o r{unourgEdinburg rormatlonformation --. ... ... ....... ......... ......... .. .................. 30 Oranda formation ................
    [Show full text]
  • Nine Mile Point Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2, Revision 22 to Updated
    NMP Unit 2 USAR 2.5 GEOLOGY, SEISMOLOGY, AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING This section provides information regarding the seismic and geologic characteristics of the site and region surrounding the site. Extensive geologic and related explorations were conducted at Unit 2, and can be categorized as: 1) general exploration; 2) bedrock investigation and mapping; 3) supplementary geologic exploration; and 4) rock mechanics investigation. Extensive geophysical surveys were performed, including seismic refraction profiling and downhole logging. The principal consultant for performing these studies was Dames & Moore, as identified in Section 1.4.5. Unit 2 is located on the southeast shore of Lake Ontario near Scriba, within a portion of the Central Lowlands Physiographic Province and the northern part of the Appalachian Basin Geologic Province. Unit 2 is situated within the Eastern Stable Platform Tectonic Province. The results of the investigations indicate that the site is relatively tectonically stable and is free of major active tectonic structures. There are no known capable faults within 8 km of the site, and there is no potential for surface faulting within the site area. The subsurface materials at the Unit 2 site are not adversely affected by collapse, subsidence, or uplift. The ground motion level for the SSE was calculated using conservative correlations sufficiently representative of seismic wave transmission characteristics of the site. 2.5.1 Basic Geologic and Seismic Information Section 2.5.1 provides the basic geologic and seismic information required for evaluation of the content in other sections of Section 2.5. Section 2.5.1 is subdivided on the basis of information pertaining to the region (Section 2.5.1.1) and information pertaining specifically to the site (Section 2.5.1.2).
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy, Structure, and Tectonics: an East-To-West Transect of the Blue Ridge and Valley and Ridge Provinces of Northern Virginia and West Virginia
    FLD016-05 1st pgs page 1 The Geological Society of America Field Guide 16 2010 Stratigraphy, structure, and tectonics: An east-to-west transect of the Blue Ridge and Valley and Ridge provinces of northern Virginia and West Virginia Lynn S. Fichter Steven J. Whitmeyer Department of Geology and Environmental Science, James Madison University, 800 S. Main Street, Harrisonburg, Virginia 22807, USA Christopher M. Bailey Geology Department, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA William Burton U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 22092, USA ABSTRACT This fi eld guide covers a two-day east-to-west transect of the Blue Ridge and Valley and Ridge provinces of northwestern Virginia and eastern West Virginia, in the context of an integrated approach to teaching stratigraphy, structural analysis, and regional tectonics. Holistic, systems-based approaches to these topics incorpo- rate both deductive (stratigraphic, structural, and tectonic theoretical models) and inductive (fi eld observations and data collection) perspectives. Discussions of these pedagogic approaches are integral to this fi eld trip. Day 1 of the fi eld trip focuses on Mesoproterozoic granitoid basement (associated with the Grenville orogeny) and overlying Neoproterozoic to Early Cambrian cover rocks (Iapetan rifting) of the greater Blue Ridge province. These units collectively form a basement-cored anticlinorium that was thrust over Paleozoic strata of the Val- ley and Ridge province during Alleghanian contractional tectonics. Day 2 traverses a foreland thrust belt that consists of Cambrian to Ordovician carbonates (Iapetan divergent continental margin), Middle to Upper Ordovician immature clastics (asso- ciated with the Taconic orogeny), Silurian to Lower Devonian quartz arenites and car- bonates (inter-orogenic tectonic calm), and Upper Devonian to Lower Mississippian clastic rocks (associated with the Acadian orogeny).
    [Show full text]
  • Current Geologic Issues in New York State: from Carbon Dioxide Storage to Landsliding
    CURRENT GEOLOGIC ISSUES IN NEW YORK STATE: FROM CARBON DIOXIDE STORAGE TO LANDSLIDING A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Kathryn Lydia Tamulonis May 2010 © 2010 Kathryn Lydia Tamulonis CURRENT GEOLOGIC ISSUES IN NEW YORK STATE: FROM CARBON DIOXIDE STORAGE TO LANDSLIDING Kathryn Lydia Tamulonis, Ph.D. Cornell University, 2010 The work in this dissertation explores two topics: 1) the local and regional geologic carbon dioxide storage potential in the Upper Ordovician Queenston Formation, and 2) the causes of current displacement at two active landslides, as well as assess past landslide activity. The study site for both projects is central New York State. A site-specific CO2 storage assessment of the Queenston Formation is performed for a particular coal-fired power plant in central New York, and this formation is also regionally evaluated for CO2 storage potential in central New York. Well log, core, seismic, and outcrop data comprise the Queenston Formation data set. In Tompkins and Cayuga Counties, the Queenston Formation was deposited in a distributary fluvial system with mobile channels and no stable, long-lived flood plains. 2 A static CO2 storage calculation reveals that a 25 mile area of the formation underlying a particular coal-fired power-plant in northern Tompkins County could store on average 18 years of CO2 emissions from that particular plant. Several regional interpretations of the Queenston Formation depositional system are constructed, but regardless of the depositional model, the Queenston Formation does not have porosity necessary for CO2 storage in western New York.
    [Show full text]